How To Cross Examination

How to Conduct Cross Examination Effectively
November 18, 2019November 27, 2019 Aamer Shahzad Abbasi Blawgs, Commentary3
comments
How to Conduct Cross Examination Effectively
Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “Nothing great was ever achieved without
enthusiasm.” Similarly, when working on a legal case, a wise strategy must be
prepared before entering the courtroom. As far as testing the knowledge and
credibility of a witness during trial is concerned, different techniques and
tactics can be utilized. Cross-examination is a method to not only ask questions
and get the truth out of a witness, it can also control anything adverse that the
witness might say during questioning. Cross-examination is a form of art which can
be learned through training, practice and experience.
Obtaining information prior to cross-examination requires a lot of effort from the

lawyers. Lawyers may even get the opportunity to approach witnesses informally so
they can understand their mind and nature during an interview, which can be helpful
in discrediting their testimony later. In some cases, during cross-examination,
lawyers are unable to extract the answers they require. This can often be the
result of insufficient knowledge or preparation, causing the case to be decided in
favour of the opposing party. The desired results cannot be achieved until the
evidence presented by a witness is challenged and proved to be flawed.
Lawyers can prepare well for cross-examination and use impeachment as a tool to
assess the strength, weakness and worthiness of the evidence presented by a witness
as well as the credibility of the witness before the court, for instance if a
witness statement is inconsistent, if the witness is a convict, if the memory of
the witness is unreliable, or other objections raised against the testimony of the
witness.
If we review the history of cross-examination, we find that it is an old method.

The very first reference to such a technique can be found in the Bible,
specifically in the book of Daniel, Chapter 13 which mentions Susanna and the
elders in her tribe who tried to put her to death but were interrupted by young
Daniel who raised his voice to demand justice against the real accused.
All laws related to evidence in all courts of Pakistan have been addressed under
the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 which altered the Evidence Act 1872. Chapter 10 of
the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 deals with cross-examination of a witness and
describes the whole procedure.
Moreover, many comprehensive law journals, research papers and articles on cross-
examination have been written by authors and columnists, which can help lawyers and
cross-examiners in understanding the method of cross-examination from different
perspectives:
According to a publication titled Cross-Examination for Prosecutors released by the

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, a branch of the US Department of
Transportation, cross-examination is an effective method to impeach and test the
credibility of the evidence provided by a witness.
Maryland Bar Journal (2015) also discusses altered evidence or testimony given by a
witness which can discredit any previous statements.
William Rakes and James O’Keefe (2017) have also written about methods to impeach
witnesses.
James W. McElhaney (1992) describes the process of asking questions during cross,
shares views on how to lead the questioning and suggests why short and simple
questions should be asked throughout the process.
John Zavitsanos in his insightful and widely read research paper on cross-
examination has written about witness credibility and how to deconstruct it.
Similarly, Maureen A. Howard in a newspaper article Lair! Lair! Impeaching the
Witness on Cross-Examination writes about a lawyer’s right to impeach witnesses
during cross-examination.
A research paper by the Canadian Bar Association, Impeachment Done Right (2011),
describes the methods to expose an omission within the evidence put forward by a
witness.
Ervin A. Gonzalez’s article, To Prepare and Conduct Effective Cross-Examination of
an Adverse Witness, published by the American Bar Association in 2000 is very
helpful in providing information on how to conduct effective cross-examination
during trial.
Strategic Cross-Examination (1987) by Stuart B. Walzer discusses strategic steps
that can be taken to conduct cross-examination.
Cross-Examination of Witnesses by Leon Jaworski is also a very helpful piece for
law practitioners to educate themselves regarding the methods of cross-examining
witness testimonies.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of CourtingTheLaw.com or any other organization with which he
might be associated.

How To Cross Examination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Cross Examination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Cross Examination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How to Conduct Cross Examination Effectively

Obtaining information prior to cross-examination requires a lot of effort from the

If we review the history of cross-examination, we find that it is an old method.

According to a publication titled Cross-Examination for Prosecutors released by the

You might also like