Raven Biology of Plants 8th Edition Evert Test Bank
Raven Biology of Plants 8th Edition Evert Test Bank
Raven Biology of Plants 8th Edition Evert Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/download/raven-biology-of-plants-8th-edition-evert-test-bank/
a. Protein
b. Cellulose
c. Starch
d. Triglyceride
e. Water
a. proteins.
b. carbohydrates.
c. lipids.
d. nucleic acids.
e. water molecules.
a. Fructose; lactose
b. Maltose; ribose
c. Cellulose; sucrose
d. Sucrose; glucose
e. Maltose; lactose
a. Cellulose
b. Fructose
c. Ribose
d. Glucose
e. Sucrose
a. sucrose; glucose
b. glucose; sucrose
c. starch; sucrose
d. maltose; lactose
e. fructose; maltose
a. starch.
b. fructan.
c. cellulose.
d. glycogen.
e. sucrose.
a. cellulose
b. sucrose
c. DNA
d. phospholipid
e. starch
a. amylose
b. amylopectin
c. chitin
d. cellulose
e. glycogen
11. Carbohydrates; pp. 21-22; moderate; ans: b
The matrix of the plant cell wall contains:
a. pectins
b. starches
c. chitins
d. lipids
e. hemicelluloses
a. hemicelluloses
b. pectins
c. lipids
d. chitins
e. starches
a. cellulose.
b. chitin.
c. starch.
d. protein.
e. phospholipid.
a. microfibrils
b. enzymes
c. storage polysaccharides
d. chitin
e. fats
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
BOTANICAL CORRESPONDENCE, NOTES
AND NEWS FOR AMATEURS, I.
Conducted by W. A. Kellerman.
II. Group.
III. Group.
IV. Group.
W. A. Kellerman.
A critical inspection of the nomenclature used for the first Fascicle of the Ohio
Fungi might seem to warrant the conclusion that the judgment of more recent
workers is sometimes ignored and that a too conservative course has been adopted.
But it should be remembered that the main purpose is to furnish Ohio material
accompanied by names (occasionally synonyms) that were undoubtedly applied to
the species represented. I have preferred to use for the Rust on Sunflower, Puccinia
helianthi, rather than P. tanaceti—recent work on other species suggesting that
with this also when fully studied, a physiological distinction may supplement the
too insignificant morphological difference. Again, I have used Aecidium album,
which Clinton applied to the first stage of the Uredine found on Vicia, not ignorant
of the fact that Dietel gives this as a stage of Uromyces albus—but should not this
first be substantiated by cultures? It is to be added that through inadvertency
Peck’s later name (Aecidium porosum) was used, hence here follows a corrected
label with both Clinton’s and Peck’s descriptions:
2. Aecidium album Clinton.
Aecidium porosum Peck.
On Vicia americana Muhl.
Lakeside, Ottawa Co., O. May 17, 1901.
Coll. W. A. Kellerman.
“Aecidium album Clinton, spots none; peridia scattered, short, white, the margin
subentire; spots subglobose, white, about .0008 inches in diameter.” Report on the
State Museum, State of New York, 26:78. 1873.
“Aecidium porosum, Pk. Spots none; cups crowded, deep-seated, broad, wide-
mouthed, occupying the whole lower surface of the leaf to which they give a porous
appearance; spores orange-colored, subangular, .0008–.001 inch in length.”
Botanical Gazette, 3:34. April, 1878.
NOTES OF TRAVEL IN PORTO RICO.
Robert F. Griggs.
Max Morse.
On May 25, 1901, Prof. Hine, while collecting in the hills at Sugar
Grove, Fairfield County, O., found a salamander under a piece of
pine log on the slope of a hill, about a hundred yards from water. It
was, for the time, put in a jar along with several individuals of
Desmognathus fusca Raf., which were taken in, or within a few feet
of the rivulets which flow down the valley. Aside from this specimen
taken on the hillside, all the specimens were found not farther than a
half dozen feet from the water. When the collections were examined
in the laboratory it was found that the single specimen just
mentioned differed in many respects from the others. This led to
investigation and it was found that it corresponded closely with the
description of D. ochrophæa Cope. Thus, the posterior portion of the
mandible was edentulous; no tubercle in canthus ocelli; belly paler
than in any of D. fusca taken; length nearly three-fourths of an inch
shorter than the others; a light bar from eye to corner of mouth;
tongue free behind; parasphenoid teeth separated behind. The
specimen was kindly examined by Dr. J. Lindahl, of the Cincinnati
Society of Nat. Hist., who is acquainted with the form. He agreed that
it corresponded with the description of Cope. Whether the characters
as given above are sufficient to place the specimen under ochrophæa
is a matter hard to decide. Cope gives the range of ochrophæa as “in
the Alleghenies and their outlying spurs.” Dr. Lindahl has a specimen
from Logansport, Ind., taken November 10, 1900.
FISHES TAKEN NEAR SALEM, OHIO.
E. B. Williamson.
John H. Schaffner.
1. A. J. Pieters. “The Plants of Western Lake Erie, with Observations on their
Distribution.” Bull. U. S. Fish Commission, 1901, pp. 57–79. Pls. 11–20.
COLLECTING TABANIDÆ.
James S. Hine.
James S. Hine.
Prof. W. A. Kellerman,
Department of Botany, Ohio State University,
Columbus, Ohio.
NEW EDITION
WEBSTER’S
INTERNATIONAL
DICTIONARY
New Plates Throughout.
SYSTEMATIC COLLECTION OF
Physical Geology
and Physiography
WRITE FOR CIRCULARS.
Wards’ Natural Science Establishment,
ROCHESTER, N. Y.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.