Case Studies-Lean Management
Case Studies-Lean Management
Case Studies-Lean Management
Many organizations have found that implementing lean concepts and tools results
in improvements in environmental performance, even when lean activities were not
initiated for environmental reasons.
Since environmental savings are often not part of the "business case" for lean
improvement activities, however, organizations implementing lean do not
necessarily quantify the environmental performance gains associated with their
lean initiatives.
General Motors Corporation (GM) has one of the most wide-spread lean
manufacturing initiatives in place in the U.S. GM grew interested in lean
manufacturing in the early 1980s, as it examined elements of the Toyota Production
System that had been adopted by several Japanese auto manufacturers.
In 1994, GM and Toyota formed a joint venture called the New United Motor
Manufacturing Inc. (NUMMI) to pioneer implementation of lean methods at an
automotive manufacturing plant in the U.S. Compared to a conventional GM plant,
NUMMI was able to cut assembly hours per car from 31 to 19 and assembly defects
per 100 cars from 135 to 45. By the early 1990s, the success of NUMMI, among other
factors, made it increasingly clear that lean manufacturing offers potent
productivity, product quality, and profitability advantages over traditional mass
production, batch-and-queue systems. By 1997, the "big three" U.S. auto
manufacturers indicated that they intend to implement their own lean systems
across all of their manufacturing operations.
Saturn has also implemented electronic kanban with some suppliers, enabling the
suppliers to deliver components "just-in-time" for assembly. For example, seating
systems are delivered to the shop floor in the order in which they will be installed.
Saturn also found that improved "first-time" quality and operational improvements
linked to lean production systems reduced paint solvent usage by 270 tons between
1995 and 1996.
flaws that need to be covered." This led the team to a simpler, less wasteful solution
– improve the quality of the die, and mold the part using resin of the desired color.
After some research, and capital investment of $400,000, the supplier incorporated
an injection molding process for the shrouds into the assembly line, eliminating the
need for the time consuming painting step. This project saved the supplier
approximately $700,000 per year, while shortening lead times and improving on-
time delivery to GM.
This lean project produced environmental benefits, although they were not needed
to make the business case for pursuing the project. Elimination of the painting
process step
• eliminated 7 tons per year of VOC emissions from the painting process step,
• all hazardous wastes associated with the painting process step (including
clean-up rags, overspray sludge, off-spec and expired paints), and
• environmental impacts associated with transporting the shrouds to the
painting vendor and back.
Case2: 3M
In 2005, 3M established a new set of corporate environmental goals from 2005 through 2010
(ET’10), as follows1.
Lean Six Sigma is anticipated to play a major role in 3M’s efforts to achieve the ET’10
goals. Lean Six Sigma has become a powerful engine supporting expanded pollution
prevention activity and effectiveness at 3M. Given Lean Six Sigma’s focus on involving
different voices through the use of cross-functional teams, personnel with environmental
expertise are often involved in Lean Six Sigma project teams. “Voice of Customer” interviews
and survey results also reflect increasing interest in environmental performance results. As the
pace of Lean Six Sigma activities increase at 3M, much of the waste and variation targeted for
elimination in Lean Six Sigma projects will bring environmental improvements on their
coattails. Lean Six Sigma control plans and post-project audits will help to ensure that these
achievements endure.
focused on corporate EHS projects and coaching (for approximately 100 team members). All
EHS team members are required to become Lean Six Sigma green belts and to lead at least one
Six Sigma project. EHS team members receive two weeks of Lean Six Sigma green belt
training, and coaching is provided by black belts. EHS Lean Six Sigma projects have focused
on topics ranging from compliance or due diligence activities to data collection and
management to communications.
While some of the Lean Six Sigma projects launched by 3M’s EH&SO organization have a
positive return on investment using conventional cost reduction-value creation measures, many
projects are justified by driving 3M toward sustainable practices and enhancing 3M’s
reputation.
In addition to the Lean Six Sigma projects launched by the EH&SO organization, multiple Lean
Six Sigma projects are undertaken by EHS personnel at 3M’s numerous manufacturing and
research and development (R&D) facilities worldwide.
All goals are indexed to net sales, except for the goal about the number of 3P
1
projects. 3M had a TRI release reduction goal under ET’05 program. Since most of
3M’s TRI releases are volatile air emissions, these releases are addressed by 3M’s
volatile air emissions reduction goal under the ET’10 program.
Useful Resources
Productivity Press Development Team. Kaizen for the Shopfloor (Portland, Oregon:
Productivity Press, 2002).
Soltero, Conrad and Gregory Waldrip. "Using Kaizen to Reduce Waste and Prevent
Pollution." Environmental Quality Management (Spring 2002), 23-37.
Productivity Development Team. Just-in-Time for Operators (Portland, Oregon:
Productivity Press, 1998).
Productivity Press Development Team. Kanban for the Shopfloor (Portland, Oregon:
Productivity Press, 2002).