Review of Underground Mining M
Review of Underground Mining M
Review of Underground Mining M
Review
Review of Underground Mining Methods in World-Class Base Metal
Deposits: Experiences from Poland and Chile
Krzysztof Skrzypkowski 1,* , René Gómez 2,3 , Krzysztof Zagórski 4 , Anna Zagórska 5 and Roberto Gómez-Espina 2
1 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Science and Technology,
Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland
2 Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4030000, Chile
3 Advanced Mining Technology Center, Santiago 4070371, Chile
4 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av.,
30-059 Kraków, Poland
5 Research Centre in Kraków, Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Science, Senacka 1,
31-002 Kraków, Poland
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Abstract: There are several massive deposits around the world with different geological characteris-
tics. Thus, different mining methods and strategies are applied based on the particularity of each
method and mine experience. Particularly, in this work, we review and summarize the underground
exploitation of some world-class base metal deposits based on Poland and Chilean experiences. Here,
the main geological and mining parameters of Poland and Chilean mines applied in massive deposits
are reported and analyzed. In Poland, mainly room and pillar methods (and variants) have been
applied in massive deposits. Here, back-filling is required to maintain the mine’s stability due to the
large deposit size and open areas. In Chile, the block caving method is commonly used in massive
underground deposits where less development is required. Here, the cave is naturally filled with
broken material and a large subsidence zone is generated. In this review, it has been observed that
different underground methods and strategies can be effectively used in massive deposits. Some
parameters that influenced the method selection are mainly related to rock mechanics, ore recovery
and dilution, subsidence zone, extraction rate, and mining experience. Here, key mining variables
Citation: Skrzypkowski, K.; Gómez, and parameters such as productivity, support, and equipment, as well as various issues related to the
R.; Zagórski, K.; Zagórska, A.;
world-class deposit are studied. Additionally, a comparison between both experiences is presented,
Gómez-Espina, R. Review of
highlighting the main geological and mining parameters. This study can be used as a reference to
Underground Mining Methods in
evaluate the different option of underground mining methods to be applied in future massive mine
World-Class Base Metal Deposits:
projects with similar geological characteristics.
Experiences from Poland and Chile.
Energies 2023, 16, 148. https://
doi.org/10.3390/en16010148
Keywords: block caving; massive deposit; mine design; room and pillar; underground mining;
world-class deposit
Academic Editor: Sergey Zhironkin
mining is defined as that with production greater than 10 kt/day or 3 Mt/year [1]. Mass-
mining methods are commonly applied to low-grade, high-tonnage deposits, so the size
and shape of the deposit are relevant characteristics in determining the suitability of a
mass-mining deposit [2].
The characteristics of the rock mass are of vital importance to determine the most
suitable mining method based on the stress deformations that occur according to the chosen
method [3]. In addition, it is necessary to select the extractive method considering the
operational costs [4]. To face these challenges, a methodology is proposed based on an
algorithm to choose the optimal method for the development of deposits, considering the
geological, technical, and operational factors of the deposit [5].
Ladinig et al. [2] mainly identify two typologies of deposits favorable for these ex-
ploitation techniques: narrow tabular deposits of large area extent, as might be the case
with some coal deposits and thick tabular deposits and massive deposits, characterized
by a large extension in all three spatial directions. In general, this last category adjusts
quite well to the so-called world-class deposits. Although the typologies and formation
processes of the deposit that this term encompasses are varied, these are characterized by
being large-tonnage and volumetrically extensive deposits. These characteristics are more
remarkable in the deposits of base metals compared to those of precious metals, presenting,
in addition to higher tonnages, higher grades.
Singer [6] defined world-class mineral deposits as the upper 10% of all deposits in
terms of the content of a given metal. The term world-class deposit is an informal term
applied to ore deposits with an exceptionally large tonnage of economically recoverable
ore [7]. This author points out that world-class deposits can be divided into giant and
supergiant, with an ore metal content in a deposit/metal greater than 1 × 1011 t and 1012 t
of average crust material, respectively. For example, in the case of gold, the resource in a
giant deposit is equal to or greater than 100 t Au, and supergiants are deposits that contain
equal to or greater than 1200 t [8]. For copper, supergiant deposits are defined as those with
more than 24 Mt Cu, and giants as having more than 2 Mt Cu; 2400 t of silver, 1.7 Mt of
zinc, or 1 Mt of lead are required to be considered a world-class deposit [6]. Although this
definition and the limits it uses are relatively old, taking into account the advancement
of exploration techniques and the continuous discovery of new large, mineralized ore
bodies, these ranges are still used today to categorize deposits as world-class, for example
in the works of [9–12], among others. Among the world-class deposits of base metals, there
are different typologies according to their genesis, ores, lithologies, etc. Porphyry copper
deposits stand out for their tonnage, these being the world’s principal source of Cu and
Mo [13]. Another important type of deposit that occasionally gives rise to world-class
mineralization is a sediment-hosted stratiform copper deposit. There is a low number
of known stratiform copper deposits, but with very attractive Cu and Ag grades and
tonnages [14]. Other types of deposits such as the manto type, Sedimentary Exhalative
deposits (SEDEX), Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS), iron oxide copper gold (IOCG),
and Mississippi Valley Type (MVT) are also main sources of base metals that occasionally
generate massive ore classifiable as world-class [15].
Different criteria can be used to define a world-class deposit. However, in this work,
we focus on the underground mine activities applied in large deposits using Poland and
Chilean large deposits as the example. A review of current underground mines within
massive deposits is a useful tool to identify the main methodologies used nowadays
that have shown good results and to identify the lessons learned in these environments.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze different underground mines in Poland
and Chile focusing on key parameters such as productivity, support, and equipment, as
well as main issues.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 3 of 24
along preferred stratigraphic units, and their copper grades frequently surpass those of
porphyry copper ores. In addition, they may contain significant amounts of other highly
desirable metals such as silver and cobalt.
The Upper Silesian ore district in south-central Poland is an important producer of zinc,
lead, and silver [28]. Five clusters of orebodies have been discovered: the eastern Olkusz
area (Pomorzany and Olkusz), the southern Chrzanów area (Trzebionka mine), the western
Bytom area, and two northern clusters in the Zawiercie and Klucze area [29]. These deposits
have been classified as Mississippi Valley Type [22,29,30]. The ore forms replacements,
cavity fillings, linings, veins, and mineralized breccias [31]. The lower and upper units
of the sequence enclosing the ores are marly or argillaceous sediments. The main ore
minerals include sphalerite, galena, pyrite, and marcasite, accompanied by the gangue
minerals dolomite, calcite, barite, chalcedony, and quartz. According to Sass-Gustkiewicz
and Kwiecinska [29], the host rock of the sulfide ores is a coarse-crystalline, ore-bearing
dolomite that tends to occur in the form of extensive, roughly tabular bodies in Triassic
sequences or bodies of various shapes in Devonian carbonates. The orebodies in Triassic
rocks occupy various positions within the ore-bearing dolomite and are tabular, lenticular,
or nestlike, except for a single, large, chimney-like body hosted in Roethian carbonates.
The Devonian orebodies occur as vertical, sub-vertical, and/or horizontal forms. The
vertical bodies contain abundant mineralized breccias, and higher in the sequence, grade
into horizontally disposed ores in both the Paleozoic and Triassic rocks [32]. The total
extractable metal content of the district is estimated at 30 Mt [28].
reaching 600 m. In addition to the most common stratiform geometry, these deposits can
Energies 2023, 16, 148 present lenses, breccia pipes, veins, or irregular shapes, sometimes all together in the5same
of 24
deposit [22].
Figure1.1.Example
Figure Example
of of inclined
inclined caving
caving design,
design, isometric
isometric view.
view.
Inthis
In thismine,
mine,there
there
is is
nono undercut
undercut level.
level. Then,
Then, drawbells
drawbells are drilled
are drilled and blasted
and blasted to
to start
start
the the caving.
caving. A small
A small hydraulic
hydraulic radiusradius
of 9 mofis9estimated
m is estimated tothe
to start start the caving
caving process.
process. This
This parameter
parameter was estimated
was estimated using anusing
MRMRan MRMR ofthis
of 20. In 20. In this method,
method, the drawthestrategy
draw strategy
is key tois
key to ensuring
ensuring interaction
interaction betweenbetween
drawpoints,drawpoints, increase
increase ore ore recovery,
recovery, and delayand delayHere,
dilution. dilu-
tion. Here, the drawpoint spacing is a critical parameter to ensure drawpoint
the drawpoint spacing is a critical parameter to ensure drawpoint interaction (flow zones) interaction
(flow
and zones) and
production production
pillar stability.pillar stability.
3.1.2.
3.1.2.Mining
MiningSupport
Support
The
The supportrequirements
support requirementsused usedininthis
thisproject
projectincluded
includedthe
thefollowing:
following:helical
helicalbolts
bolts
(2.6 m length; 22 mm diameter), self-drilling bolts, electro-welded mesh
(2.6 m length; 22 mm diameter), self-drilling bolts, electro-welded mesh (C-196) (C-196) and brained
and
steel mesh,
brained internal
steel mesh,anchoring with grouting,
internal anchoring resin and resin
with grouting, expansion pin, shotcrete
and expansion pin, with and
shotcrete
without
with and fiber (150 mm),
without fiber and
(150 reticulated frames. Theframes.
mm), and reticulated support design
The varies
support depending
design varies on
de-
the rock mass quality of each sector. Figure 2 shows an example of the support
pending on the rock mass quality of each sector. Figure 2 shows an example of the support design
applied in a drift.
design applied in a drift.
3.1.3. Equipment
In the current construction phase, there has been different mining equipment such as
one dumper, two arm jumbos, one arm jumbo, one Simba, four mixer trucks, two LHD of
6 yd3 , two robotshots (equipment used for shotcrete projection), and one backhoe with a
hammer for scaling. The extraction equipment requirement is currently under study. These
probably will include one or two LHD due to the low production rate and the trucking
system to move the ore out of the mine.
geological feature is the west fault observed in Figure 3. This fault separates the waste on
the western side from the ore body.
3.1.3. Equipment
In the current construction phase, there has been different mining equipment such as
one dumper, two arm jumbos, one arm jumbo, one Simba, four mixer trucks, two LHD of
6 yd3, two robotshots (equipment used for shotcrete projection), and one backhoe with a
hammer for scaling. The extraction equipment requirement is currently under study.
These probably will include one or two LHD due to the low production rate and the truck-
ing system to move the ore out of the mine.
.
Figure 3.
Figure Chuquicamata transition
3. Chuquicamata transition project
project and
and west
west fault
fault [44],
[44], isometric
isometric view.
view.
3.2.1. Underground Mining Method
3.2.1. Underground Mining Method
This project is a transition from an open pit project that was transitioned to an under-
This project is a transition from an open pit project that was transitioned to an under-
ground mine due to the open pit depth (1.1 km). The underground method selection was
ground mine due to the open pit depth (1.1 km). The underground method selection was
block caving with macroblocks applying the El Teniente extraction level layout [44,45]. The
block caving with macroblocks applying the El Teniente extraction level layout [44,45].
ore column heights are 216 m for level 1, 432 m for level 2, and 216 m for level 3 [44]. The
The ore column
ore extraction heights
already are 216
started m for
at the level
first 1, 432 m for
macroblocks (inlevel 2, andof216
the center m for
level level level
1) while 3 [44].1
The ore extraction already started at the first macroblocks
continues to be under development, at the time of this writing. (in the center of level 1) while
level 1 continues to be under development, at the time of this writing.
In this project, preconditioning through hydraulic fractures and confined blasting is
applied in the rock mass over the production level to improve the caving process. The
holes were drilled from some drawbells, the undercut level, and a hydro-fracturing level.
The undercutting level is west–east oriented, with galleries of 4.2 m x 4.4 m. This size is
defined by the driller equipment and ventilation ducts.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 7 of 24
Figure 5. Productionand
and extractiondrift
drift supportconstructions
constructions [47].
Figure5.5. Production
Figure Production andextraction
extraction driftsupport
support constructions[47].
[47].
3.2.3.
3.2.3. Equipment
Equipment
3.2.3. Equipment
Construction
Construction equipment
equipment usedused includes
includesJumbo
JumboandandSimba
Simbadrillers,
drillers,backhoes,
backhoes, exca-
excava-
vators,Construction
blindhole, equipment
hole,raise
raise used
borer,loaders, includes
loaders, Jumbo
scoops (LHD),and Simba drillers,
dumpers, mixer backhoes, excava-
tors, blind borer, scoops (LHD), dumpers, mixer trucks,
trucks, robotshot,
robotshot,
tors, blind
trucks hole, raise borer, loaders,production,
scoops (LHD), dumpers, 3 mixer trucks, arobotshot,
trucks of
ofexplosives,
explosives, and
and forklifts.
forklifts. In
In production, LHD
LHD ofof 77 yd
yd33 that
that dump
dump inin a primary
primary
trucks
crusher of explosives,
connected to and
an oreforklifts.
pass are In production,
currently LHD
being of
used. 7 yd that dump in a primary
crusher connected to an ore pass are currently being used.
crusher connected to an ore pass are currently being used.
3.3. Copper and Molybdenum Exploitation in the O’Higgins Region
3.3. Copper and Molybdenum Exploitation in the O’Higgins Region
The El Teniente mine is one of the largest underground copper mines in the world
The El Teniente mine is one of the largest underground copper mines in the world
with more than 3000 km of drifts. It is in the Andes range (Farellones formation) in the
with more than 3000 km of drifts. It is in the Andes range (Farellones formation) in the
central zone of Chile, about 70 km from Santiago, Chile. El Teniente is a porphyry Cu–Mo
central zone of Chile, about 70 km from Santiago, Chile. El Teniente is a porphyry Cu–Mo
deposit, anomalous in size, with over 94 million tonnes (Mt) of contained fine copper,
deposit, anomalous in size, with over 94 million tonnes (Mt) of contained fine copper,
where the principal host rocks are andesites [48]. The primary copper ore is very compe-
where the principal host rocks are andesites [48]. The primary copper ore is very compe-
tent and massive, with almost no open discontinuities [49]. The mine is subdivided into
tent and massive, with almost no open discontinuities [49]. The mine is subdivided into
Energies 2023, 16, 148 8 of 24
walls in production level pillars. Additionally, the use of mechanized and tele-commanded
equipment increased during development. These measures increased the safety during
development but also the cycle time.
Figure 8 shows an example of the support used during the new mine level construction.
Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 26
The bolt layout is shown in blue, while the cable bolt layout is shown in pink. Bolts and
cable bolt adhered to rock mass with concrete and additives. Two shotcrete layers are
applied by dividing by two meshes. The bolts are pressed between both shotcrete layers.
Figure 8. 8.
Figure Example of of
Example support used
support in in
used high seismic
high risk
seismic [52].
risk [52].
3.3.3. Equipment
Diverse mining equipment is used in this mine during construction and ore extrac-
tion. At the production level, LHD of 7 yd3 (~9.7 tonnes) CAT R1600H are commonly used,
with a productivity of around of 3000 tpd. In addition, other LHD models are used such
as the Sandvik lh410 and lh517 models, and the Caterpillar R1600H model. The haulage
level (Teniente 7) is an intermediate haulage level where underground trucks are used.
These trucks have commonly 40 t or 80 t of capacity (Volvo and Supra 012H model, re-
Energies 2023, 16, 148 10 of 24
3.3.3. Equipment
Diverse mining equipment is used in this mine during construction and ore extraction.
At the production level, LHD of 7 yd3 (~9.7 tonnes) CAT R1600H are commonly used, with
a productivity of around of 3000 tpd. In addition, other LHD models are used such as the
Sandvik lh410 and lh517 models, and the Caterpillar R1600H model. The haulage level
(Teniente 7) is an intermediate haulage level where underground trucks are used. These
trucks have commonly 40 t or 80 t of capacity (Volvo and Supra 012H model, respectively).
Then, the ore is transported by ore pass to the railway located in El Teniente 8 level. In the
new levels, conveyor belt will also be used in the new haulage level.
Figure9.9.The
Figure Theway
wayof oftransporting
transporting the
the excavated
excavated material
material from
from the
the exploitation
exploitation field
field to
to the
the surface:
surface:
EF1—exploitationfield
EF1—exploitation fieldno
no1;
1;EF2—exploitation
EF2—exploitationfield
fieldno
no 2;
2; 1—haulage
1—haulage room;
room; 2—transportation
2—transportation drift;
drift;
3—discharge (chute) small shaft; 4—field rock drift; 5—main rock drift; 6—dump’s
3—discharge (chute) small shaft; 4—field rock drift; 5—main rock drift; 6—dump’s room; 7—storage room; 7—
storage reservoir; 8—measure reservoir; 9—skip hoist; A—passable dump; B—inclined
reservoir; 8—measure reservoir; 9—skip hoist; A—passable dump; B—inclined plane; C—steel plane; C—
steel membered
membered conveyor;
conveyor; D—jaw D—jaw crusher;
crusher; E—beltE—belt conveyors.
conveyors.
Figure 10.
Figure Scheme of
10. Scheme of preparation
preparation of
of aa thick
thick orebody
orebody for
for exploitation.
exploitation.
In the
In the mining
mining field,
field, rooms
rooms with
with aa width
width ofof 10
10 m
m to
to 16
16 m
m and
and aa length
length ofof up
up to
to 70
70 m
m
were
were designed,
designed, asaswell
wellas
asinter-room
inter-roompillars
pillarswith
witha awidth
widthofof
3m3mtoto
4 m. InIn
4 m. thethe
deposit upup
deposit to
10 m thick, the deposit with the contour of the designed room was selected by dividing it
to 10 m thick, the deposit with the contour of the designed room was selected by dividing
into two layers. First, the 3 m thick roofing layer was exploited, and then the bottom layer
it into two layers. First, the 3 m thick roofing layer was exploited, and then the bottom
was as well. The preparation of the rooms for exploitation consisted of the construction
layer was as well. The preparation of the rooms for exploitation consisted of the
of a transportation roadway on the bottom of the deposit, located under the exploration
roadway, over-room roadways located in the axes of the designed rooms under the roof of
the deposit, and chute and breakthrough small shafts connecting the transporting roadway
with the over-room roadway (Figure 11).
In the first stage of exploitation, the over-room roadway was widened to the width
of the designed room. The deposit in the first layer was made with short blast holes. The
output was placed in the chute and breakthrough small shaft. The roof of the workings
was secured along the entire length with the rock bolt support with expansion heads or
with an application of resin cartridges. The length of the bolt support was at least 1.6 m.
The distance between the bolts did not exceed 1.2 m. The mining of the second layer began
with widening the small shaft chute to the width of the future room. The widening was
performed with short blast holes, leaving a 3 m wide retaining barrier pillar from the side
of the transporting roadway. Then the bottom layer was selected with the use of long blast
holes drilled from the top layer. During the exploitation of the bottom layer, 4 m wide and
4 m deep cut-rooms were made in the sidewall of the room from the side of the orebody.
The distance between the cut-rooms was 8 m. The cut-rooms were crossed by the designed
inter-room pillar, reducing operational losses. Finally, there were unselected rectangular
pillars with dimensions of 4 × 8 m between the rooms.
construction of a transportation roadway on the bottom of the deposit, located under the
exploration roadway, over-room roadways located in the axes of the designed rooms
Energies 2023, 16, 148 under the roof of the deposit, and chute and breakthrough small shafts connecting 12 the
of 24
transporting roadway with the over-room roadway (Figure 11).
Figure 11. Room and pillar mining method in an orebody with a thickness of up to 10 m.
Figure 11. Room and pillar mining method in an orebody with a thickness of up to 10 m.
Exploitation works were carried out simultaneously in several rooms, usually in three
rooms:In thethefirst
firststage of exploitation,
room—excavating thethe over-room
roof layer; theroadway was widened to the
second room—selecting the bottom
width
of
layer and cut-rooms in the pillar; the third room—building backfilling wooden dams inThe
the designed room. The deposit in the first layer was made with short blast holes. the
output
cut-rooms wasinplaced in the
the pillar. Thechute
rooms and breakthrough
were shaped intosmall shaft. The
a trapezoid as a roof
resultofofthetheworkings
deviation
was secured
of the sidewalls alongtowards
the entire thelength
orebody with at the rock bolt
an angle support
of about 5◦ .with
Theexpansion
deposit was heads
minedor
with an application of resin cartridges. The length of the
with the use of explosives such as dynamite, ammonite, and saletrol. The haulage of thebolt support was at least 1.6 m.
The distancematerial
excavated betweenwas thecarried
bolts did not
out exceed
with the 1.2
usem. of The
loadingmining andofhauling
the second layer
trucks. began
Wooden
with widening the small shaft chute to the width of the
dams and backfilling cloth were used to enclose the room. The room was supplemented future room. The widening was in
performed
two stages.with In theshort blast
first holes,
stage, theleaving
room was a3m wide retaining
extended to half its barrier
height.pillar from the side
Complementing
of the
the transporting
filling to the roof roadway.
took place Then the bottom
while filling thelayernextwas selected
room. In thewith
orethe use of up
deposits long toblast
15 m
holes
thick,drilled
layers fromup tothe 6 mtop layer.
thick were During
separatedthe exploitation
in the room,ofwhich the bottom layer, from
were mined 4 m wide and
the room
4tomthe
deep cut-rooms
bottom of thewereroommade (in thein case
the sidewall
of stableofrooms)
the room or infromthe the side offrom
direction the orebody.
the floor
The distance
to the roof (in between
the case theofcut-rooms
less stablewas 8 m.In
roofs). The thecut-rooms were crossed
case of mining layers in bythethe top-down
designed
inter-room
direction, the pillar, reducing
filling of the operational
rooms took losses.
place afterFinally, there the
selecting were unselected
orebody in the rectangular
room [53].
In the with
pillars case dimensions
of the reverse of order
4×8m ofbetween
selectingthe therooms.
layers, after mining the layer, backfilling
was Exploitation
performed, and worksthe next
werehigher
carriedlayer
out was selected along
simultaneously in the backfilling.
several rooms, The usuallyscheme in
of mining
three rooms: a deposit
the firstinroom—excavating
a 15 m high roomthe using
roofthree layers
layer; in the top-down
the second room—selectingdirection theis
shown layer
bottom in Figure and12. cut-rooms in the pillar; the third room—building backfilling wooden
dams in the cut-rooms in the pillar. The rooms were shaped into a trapezoid as a result of
4.2.deviation
the Zinc and Lead of the Exploitation
sidewalls in the Olkusz
towards the Region
orebody at an angle of about 5°. The deposit
Room and
was mined withpillarthe usemining methods with
of explosives suchthe as bottom
dynamite, discharge
ammonite, of theandoutput was used
saletrol. The
in the Olkusz
haulage of the region
excavated in the 1970s to
material wasextract
carrieda thick deposit
out with the ofusezinc and leadand
of loading ores with a
hauling
thickness
trucks. Woodenof 9 mdams to 15and m [54]. The exploitation
backfilling cloth werewas usedconducted
to enclose in thetwo
room.stages. In thewas
The room first
stage, rooms with a width of 10 m to 12 m were selected in
supplemented in two stages. In the first stage, the room was extended to half its height.the mining field and continuous
pillars 7 m wide were
Complementing left between
the filling the rooms
to the roof (Figure
took place 13). In
while the second
filling the next stage, the In
room. inter-room
the ore
deposits up to 15 m thick, layers up to 6 m thick were separated in the room, whichmining
pillars in the mining field were mined. It was assumed that after the simultaneous were
of the pillars
mined from the in the
room selection field, the
to the bottom ofexcavated
the room material
(in the case would be ejected
of stable rooms) to the rooms
or in the
and the roof rocks would fall. The material thrown into the
direction from the floor to the roof (in the case of less stable roofs). In the case of mining rooms was to be recovered
through
layers in discharge
the top-down openings madethe
direction, under theof
filling rooms. The elementary
the rooms took placefield afterwas contoured
selecting the
with exploration roadways in a 100 × 100 m grid, which was divided into two fields, and
the rooms were perpendicular to the longer edge of the field. Preparatory works in the field
were performed on two or three levels: under the orebody, under the roof of the orebody
and above the orebody. Above the roof of the orebody (about 5 m), over-pillar roadways
were made along the axis of the designed pillars. They were intended for drilling blast
Energies 2023, 16, 148 13 of 24
Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 26
holes in the pillars and mining the pillars between the rooms. This concept was quickly
orebody
abandoned in and
the room [53].roadways
the pillar In the case
wereofreplaced
the reverse
withorder
pillarof selectingmade
roadways the layers, after
at the same
mining
level as the
the layer, backfilling
haulage roadways. was performed,
Under and
the roof of the next higher
orebody, layer wasroadways
over-room selected along
were
driven,
the located in
backfilling. Thethescheme
axis of of
themining
designed rooms or
a deposit in the
a 15corner
m high of room
the room.
usingThese
threeroadways
layers in
were connected
the top-down by a system
direction of preparatory
is shown workings with a ventilation level.
in Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Figure Room and
12. Room and pillar
pillar mining
mining method
method in
in an
an orebody
orebody with
with aa thickness
thickness of
of more
more than
than 10
10 m.
m.
compensation space in the case of the material blasted from the first advance (the distance
between the fans of the holes, was 2.5 m). The diameter of the blast hole in the fan was
70 mm, and the length of the holes was from 6 m to 15 m. The total length of the holes in
the fan was from 96 m to 115 m.
For the blasting, saletrol was used and injected into the holes using pneumatic injectors.
The maximum mass of the explosive in the fan was 350 kg. One or two fans were blasted
simultaneously. The output rolled down to the discharged chutes, which undercut the
bottom of the room. The first stage was related to the mining of the orebody in the rooms.
After mining the orebody in the selection field, the mining of the inter-room pillars was
started, which was the second stage. For this purpose, one row of long blast holes was
drilled from the over-pillar roadways and all the pillars were mined at the same time. After
blasting, only part of the excavated material was thrown toward the rooms. Most of the
output remained between the rooms and it could not be recovered through the discharge
openings made for the rooms.
In addition, the planned caving of the roof rocks did not take place. Maintaining
such a large underground void was dangerous. The aforementioned technological defects,
compared to the planned design assumptions, showed that the operating losses in this
method were very high—up to 40% and due to the second stage of operation, the system
was uneconomical. In the following fields, various attempts were made to improve the
technology in the second stage of operation. In some fields, all the pillars were abandoned
and only every second pillar in the field was mined. The attempts at improvement did
Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEWnot bring the expected economic effects, which prompted the discontinuation16ofofthis 26
exploitation mining method.
Later, successful attempts were made with the help of a sublevel caving method. This
method was used in the Olkusz region in Poland to extract zinc and lead ore deposits, the
roof of which was disturbed by the earlier exploitation of the higher layers, and to extract
roof of which was disturbed by the earlier exploitation of the higher layers, and to extract
the remains of the ore [55]. The sublevel caving method could also be used in a deposit
the remains of the ore [55]. The sublevel caving method could also be used in a deposit
that had not been affected by previous mining operations when the roof rocks showed a
that had not been affected by previous mining operations when the roof rocks showed a
high tendency to collapse. The method could not be used in the case of watered layers in
high tendency to collapse. The method could not be used in the case of watered layers in
the overburden or the upper layers. In the case of a thick orebody, 7 m thick layers were
the overburden or the upper layers. In the case of a thick orebody, 7 m thick layers were
separated in horizontal planes, and 8 m wide blocks in vertical planes (Figure 14).
separated in horizontal planes, and 8 m wide blocks in vertical planes (Figure 14).
Figure14.
Figure Sublevelcaving
14.Sublevel cavingused
usedin
inthe
theOlkusz–Pomorzany
Olkusz–Pomorzanymine
minein
inPoland.
Poland.
The layers
The layers were
were mined
mined with
with blocks/stopes
blocks/stopesexploited
exploitedfromfromtoptopto tobottom.
bottom.In Inthe
theaxis
axis
of each block, mining drifts with dimensions of 3 × 3 m were driven
of each block, mining drifts with dimensions of 3 × 3 m were driven on the floor of the on the floor of the
layer, and they were protected using rock bolt support. In the lower layers,
layer, and they were protected using rock bolt support. In the lower layers, the blocks the blocks were
moved
were by half
moved theirtheir
by half length between
length betweenthe the
axesaxes
of the drifts,
of the which
drifts, which ensured
ensuredthethe
recovery
recoveryof
the ore left in the leftovers between the mining drifts in the upper layer. The
of the ore left in the leftovers between the mining drifts in the upper layer. The length of length of the
exploitation
the blocks
exploitation diddid
blocks notnot
exceed 100100
exceed m. m.
The blast holes were drilled from
The blast holes were drilled from the the exploitation
exploitation drift
drift in
in aa fan
fan arrangement.
arrangement. The The
diameter of the holes ranged from 50 mm to 70 mm, and the distance
diameter of the holes ranged from 50 mm to 70 mm, and the distance between the fans between the fans
rangedfrom
ranged from 11 mmtoto1.8
1.8m.
m.About
About1212blast
blastholes
holeswere
weredrilled
drilledininone
onefan.
fan.The
Theore
orewas
wasblasted
blasted
with saletrol, which was loaded into the holes using a pneumatic injector. The blasted
with saletrol, which was loaded into the holes using a pneumatic injector. The blasted
material rolled down to the roadways and was loaded and set aside with self-propelled
material rolled down to the roadways and was loaded and set aside with self-propelled
machines—loaders. The main advantages of the method were the ability to safely select the
machines—loaders. The main advantages of the method were the ability to safely select
the deposit under the roof of rocks damaged by previous mining; the possibility of
recovering the ore left in the collapsed space of the upper layers; the ability to safely
extract the ore left in the inter-room pillars. The disadvantages of the method were the
dilution of the ore with rocks permeating from the caving space; enormous devastation of
Energies 2023, 16, 148 15 of 24
deposit under the roof of rocks damaged by previous mining; the possibility of recovering
the ore left in the collapsed space of the upper layers; the ability to safely extract the ore
left in the inter-room pillars. The disadvantages of the method were the dilution of the
ore with rocks permeating from the caving space; enormous devastation of the surface, as
the exploitation was carried out at shallow depths, about 60 m below the ground surface.
The above-mentioned disadvantages resulted in abandoning the exploitation of zinc and
lead ore deposits using the sublevel caving method. From 1990 to 2020, thick deposits
were mined from the bottom up, with horizontal layers 5–6 m high. In the first layer, a
room and pillar method was always used, while the subsequent layers were exploited
with a strip method with the liquidation of post-mining space with the use of hydraulic
backfilling [56,57].
Figure 15. Room and pillar mining method using two-layer orebody exploitation.
First, the roof layer with a thickness of about 4.5 m was selected [59]. It included
dolomites, shales, and sandstones. In this layer, 28 × 10.5 m pillars were separated by room
workings. The longer side of the pillar was parallel to the goal line. The rooms were about
7 m wide at the roof, and their sidewalls were inclined towards the whole body at an angle
of about 10°. There were three rows of pillars ahead of time. Preparation for the
Energies 2023, 16, 148 16 of 24
First, the roof layer with a thickness of about 4.5 m was selected [59]. It included
dolomites, shales, and sandstones. In this layer, 28 × 10.5 m pillars were separated by room
workings. The longer side of the pillar was parallel to the goal line. The rooms were about
7 m wide at the roof, and their sidewalls were inclined towards the whole body at an angle
of about 10◦ . There were three rows of pillars ahead of time. Preparation for the exploitation
of the bottom layer consisted of making inclined drifts from the top layer, giving them a
slope that enabled the movement of mobile machines (from 5◦ to 8◦ ). Flooring down the
inclined drifts was performed continuously, as the work front progresses. The selection of
the orebody in both layers took place simultaneously with the maintenance of appropriate
advance. In the top layer, the last row of pillars was selected and the maximum width of
the exposed roof was 17.5 m.
The selection of pillars proceeded on both sides from the inclined drifts toward the
center of the field. The mining of the bottom layer followed the selected pillars. A distance
of 12 m to 36 m was maintained between the face in both layers due to the blasting works
and the movement of machines. The lower layer was cut with long blast holes drilled from
the upper layer. After mining both layers, a room about 15 m high, 17.5 m wide at the roof,
and 150 m to 200 m long was created. The drilling of blast holes and loading and hauling of
the excavated material were performed with typical self-propelled machines. Full column
resin bolt support (2.6 m) was used, installed in a 1 × 1 m net bolting. In the upper layer,
Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW
the workings had a trapezoidal shape, while the inclined drifts and room workings 18 oval
of 26
shape. The rooms in the upper layer were ventilated until they were connected using
duct ventilation. In the perpendicular rooms of the upper layer, backfilling wooden dams
were built at
movement ofthe
theedge of the
mining room. In
machines, the inclined
wooden dams drifts for the
were built onmovement of the
the sand, after mining
the room
machines, wooden dams were built on the sand, after the room was
was backfilled up to the floor of the upper layer (Figure 16). When designing backfilled uptheto
the floor of the upper layer (Figure 16). When designing the excavation at
excavation at a distance of 15 m from the stream of air flow generated by the main fan, a distance
of
they15are
m ventilated
from the stream of air Excavations
by diffusion. flow generated by15
above themmain fan, theywith
are ventilated are separate
ventilated by
fans.
diffusion. Excavations above 15 m are ventilated with separate fans. The amount
The amount of fresh air introduced must ensure the appropriate composition, such as of fresh
air introduced
O2—min. 19%;must ensure the
CO2—max. appropriate
1.0% composition,
(10000 ppm); CO—max. such as O2 —min.
0.0026% 19%; CO
(26 ppm); 2 —max.
H2S—max.
1.0% (10,000 ppm); CO—max. 0.0026% (26 ppm); H2 S—max. 0.0007% (7 ppm); SO2 —max.
0.0007% (7 ppm); SO2—max. 0.000075% (0.75 ppm); NO2—max. 0.00026% (2.6 ppm).
0.000075% (0.75 ppm); NO2 —max. 0.00026% (2.6 ppm).
Mining
Mining ofof copper
copperoreoredeposits
depositsininthethe
area of LGOM
area of LGOM is carried out in
is carried outconditions of high
in conditions of
seismic activity of the rock mass. Therefore, in the blasting metric, apart
high seismic activity of the rock mass. Therefore, in the blasting metric, apart from from breakage,
mining,
breakage,and contouring
mining, holes, destress
and contouring holes, relief
destressholes areholes
relief oftenare
made,
oftenthe length
made, the of which
length of
are usually twice as long as the mining holes (Figure 17). Moreover, the
which are usually twice as long as the mining holes (Figure 17). Moreover, the diameterdiameter of the
destress blastingblasting
of the destress holes isholes
almost is twice
almostas twice
large. as
Forlarge.
example, for 30 holes,
For example, for the explosive
30 holes, the
load is 84 kg, and with destress holes with a diameter of 0.089 m, the maximum
explosive load is 84 kg, and with destress holes with a diameter of 0.089 m, the maximum explosive
load is 116load
explosive kg. is 116 kg.
The backfilling water was discharged to the field sedimentation reservoirs through
pipe channels (worn pipes with a diameter of 500 mm) laid in the backfilling at the level
of the bottom of the upper layer and through perforated tubing and wrapped with a
backfilling cloth laid on the bottom of the lower layer. Pipe channels were arranged in each
upper layer room and the end layer rooms of the bottom layer. The backfilling pipeline was
installed in the rooms of the upper layer. After backfilling the post-exploitation area, the
sand was removed from the inclined drifts (picked up with loading trucks) and the cycle
Figure 16. Backfilling in the inclined drift.
Mining of copper ore deposits in the area of LGOM is carried out in conditions of
Energies 2023, 16, 148 high seismic activity of the rock mass. Therefore, in the blasting metric, apart17from of 24
breakage, mining, and contouring holes, destress relief holes are often made, the length of
which are usually twice as long as the mining holes (Figure 17). Moreover, the diameter
of
wasthe destress
repeated in blasting
the field. holes is almost
Exploitation wastwice as large.
performed For example,
simultaneously in for 30 holes,
at least the
two fields
explosive load is 84 kg, and with destress holes with a diameter of 0.089 m, the maximum
of exploitation. The times of selection, liquidation, and preparatory works in both fields
explosive loadinissuch
were selected 116 kg.
a way as to ensure the continuity of the mining process.
Figure 17.
Figure Arrangement of
17. Arrangement of blasting
blasting holes
holes in
in the
the ore
ore forehead.
forehead.
The backfilling
The backfilling that is used
water was in mining excavations
discharged to the fieldis sedimentation
either dry or hydraulic. Inthrough
reservoirs the case
of dry backfilling, the rock material comes from preparatory and mining excavations
pipe channels (worn pipes with a diameter of 500 mm) laid in the backfilling at the level and
is delivered to the space selected by mine loaders. The hydraulic backfilling,
of the bottom of the upper layer and through perforated tubing and wrapped with a on the other
hand, is transported using pipelines with a diameter of 0.150 m and 0.185 m. Backfilling
backfilling cloth laid on the bottom of the lower layer. Pipe channels were arranged in
material may be non-combustible and non-toxic solids. Filling material can also be used:
each upper layer room and the end layer rooms of the bottom layer. The backfilling
sand; gravel; waste: slags; gang; industrial waste. It is worth noting that the maximum
pipeline was installed in the rooms of the upper layer. After backfilling the post-
dimension of grains should not be greater than 0.06 m; the content of particles of size less
exploitation area, the sand was removed from the inclined drifts (picked up with loading
than 0.1 mm are at most 20%; and the compressibility at pressure 15 MPa is at most 15%.
trucks) and the cycle was repeated in the field. Exploitation was performed
Water flowing into mine workings is discharged to the surface through drainage
simultaneously in at least two fields of exploitation. The times of selection, liquidation,
devices and special workings included in the mine drainage. In the vast majority of cases,
and preparatory works in both fields were selected in such a way as to ensure the
water runoff occurs automatically, by gravity, through transport headings in the direction
continuity of the mining process.
from the mining fields to the main mine drainage system. Due to the drainage of water,
it is advisable to drive a drift and roadways with an inclination of up to 3‰ towards the
shafts, and in the case of more polluted water up to 5‰. The whole of the main drainage
workings (Figure 18) consists of water reservoirs at the pump chamber; drifts and inclined
drifts supplying water to reservoirs; pump chambers; suction wells and water channels—
connecting water reservoirs with water wells; an access roadway connecting the pump
chamber with the bottom shaft; a pipe channel connecting the pump chamber with the
shaft and used to accommodate water pipelines and to ventilate the chamber.
Water reservoirs are mining excavations in the vicinity of the pump chamber of the
main drainage, designed to collect underground water from the natural inflow and from the
hydraulic backfilling. In Poland, the capacity of active water reservoirs should be sufficient for
at least a 12-h supply of water from natural inflow and backfilling to the excavations, where
main drainage systems are capable of discharging the highest daily water inflow in less than
20 h. The pump chamber is a mining excavation with built-in pump units for pumping water
directly to the surface or to a higher level of the mine. The chamber is located parallel to water
reservoirs and most often between water reservoirs. The size of the pump chamber depends
primarily on the number of installed pump units. In Poland, pump chambers of the main
drainage at levels with water inflow over 1 m3 /min are equipped with at least three pumps.
If the pump chamber is equipped with pump units, the number of pumps in these units shall
be at least: five pumps with two pumps working in a group; seven pumps with three pumps
working in a group. The following numbers of pumps should be in full operational readiness
at all times in the pump chamber of the main drainage: two pumps, in chambers equipped
with three pumps; two sets of pumps, in chambers equipped with sets of pumps. The devices,
together with the main drainage systems, should enable the discharge of the highest daily
water supply in no more than 20 h.
shafts, and in the case of more polluted water up to 5‰. The whole of the main drainage
workings (Figure 18) consists of water reservoirs at the pump chamber; drifts and inclined
drifts supplying water to reservoirs; pump chambers; suction wells and water channels—
connecting water reservoirs with water wells; an access roadway connecting the pump
Energies 2023, 16, 148 chamber with the bottom shaft; a pipe channel connecting the pump chamber with 18 the
of 24
shaft and used to accommodate water pipelines and to ventilate the chamber.
sets of pumps, in chambers equipped with sets of pumps. The devices, together with the
main drainage systems, should enable the discharge of the highest daily water supply in
no more than 20 h.
FigureDuring
18. Mainthe 1990s,
drainage due to1—bottom
workings: the increasing seismic
shaft; 2—pump risk and
chamber; rockchannel;
3—pipe bursts,4—pump
attempts were
Figure 18. Main drainage workings: 1—bottom shaft; 2—pump chamber; 3—pipe channel; 4—
made well;
suction to select
5—water a thick deposit
channels; 6—waterwith the use of pillars operating in the post-destruction
reservoirs.
pump suction well; 5—water channels; 6—water reservoirs.
phase, located perpendicular to the operational front line. The positive results of industria
During the 1990s, due to the increasing seismic risk and rock bursts, attempts were
research confirmedarethe
Water reservoirs legitimacy
mining of the
excavations introduced
in the vicinity ofgeometric
the pump chamberchangesofand the made i
made to select a thick deposit with the use of pillars operating in the post-destruction
possible
main to develop
drainage, designed a one-stage
to collect method with the from
liquidation of the space selected
from with a
phase, located perpendicular to theunderground
operational front waterline. Thethe natural
positive inflow
results ofand
industrial
the hydraulic
hydraulic backfilling.
filling (the In
properPoland,namethe capacity
of the of active
mining water
system
research confirmed the legitimacy of the introduced geometric changes and made it possible reservoirs
“Rudna should
7”) [60].beWith this
sufficient
method,
to for
developore at least a 12-h
depositsmethod
a one-stage supply
with awith of water
thickness from natural
of up toof18the
the liquidation inflow
mspace
and an and backfilling
inclination
selected to the
angle of up to 8°
with a hydraulic
excavations,
can be(the
filling where
mined.
proper Themain
nameroofdrainage
of conditionssystems
the mining are capable
should
system allow of
“Rudna thedischarging
7”) use thethe
[60].ofWith highest
rock
this bolt daily
method, support.
ore It is
water inflow
recommended
deposits in less than 20 h.
that thisofmethod
with a thickness The pump
up to 18be m usedchamber
and an when is a mining
rocks angle
inclination excavation
with ofincreased ◦
up to 8 can with built-in
strength parameters
be mined.
pump
The units for pumping water directly to of
thethe
surface or tosupport.
a higherItlevel of the mine. The
androofhigh conditions
rock burst should allow
tendency the
areusepresent rock bolt
in the exploitation isgate.
recommended thatphase o
In the first
chamber
this methodis located
be usedparallel
when to water
rocks reservoirs
with increased and most often between water reservoirs.
excavation works in the mining field, a 6 m strength
to 7 m wideparameters
room is andcuthigh
intorock
theburst
upper layer
The
tendency are present in the exploitation gate. In the first phase of excavation worksunits.
size of the pump chamber depends primarily on the number of installed pump in the
up to
Inmining
Poland,5 m high,
pump separating technological pillars with dimensions of 7–9 ×1 m3/minm (Figure
16–38
field, a 6 chambers
m to 7 m wide of theroom
mainisdrainage at levels
cut into the upperwith water
layer, up to inflow over separating
5 m high,
19).equipped with at least three pumps. If the pump chamber is equipped with pump
are
technological pillars with dimensions of 7–9 × 16–38 m (Figure 19).
units, the number of pumps in these units shall be at least: five pumps with two pumps
working in a group; seven pumps with three pumps working in a group. The following
numbers of pumps should be in full operational readiness at all times in the pump
chamber of the main drainage: two pumps, in chambers equipped with three pumps; two
Figure19.
Figure 19.AAtwo-layer
two-layer room
room andand pillar
pillar mining
mining method
method with awith a hydraulic
hydraulic backfillbackfill in of
in the case thethe
case of the
exploitationgate
exploitation gate conditions
conditions made
made of rocks
of rocks strongly
strongly proneprone
to rockto rock bursts.
bursts.
There
Therearearenono
less than
less twotwo
than rows of technological
rows pillarspillars
of technological in the front.
in theThe width
front. Theofwidth
the of the
rooms in the upper layer may be increased to 10 m as a result of induced seismicity
rooms in the upper layer may be increased to 10 m as a result of induced seismicity and and
falling rocks from the sidewalls. Before mining the bottom layer, a pillar adjacent to the
falling rocks from the sidewalls. Before mining the bottom layer, a pillar adjacent to the
backfill is partially mined, leaving residual pillars with a roof area ranging from 16 m2 to
backfill
25 is partially
m2 . Under mined,
favorable roof leaving residual
conditions, pillars with
it is permissible a roofthe
to select area ranging
pillar from 16 m2 to
completely,
25 m2. Under favorable roof conditions, it is permissible to select the pillar completely
without leaving any residual pillars. To the bottom of the layer in an elementary field with
one room and one technological pillar, there are inclined drifts with an inclination from
5° to 8° that allow the movement of mobile machines. The inclined drifts are used in
Energies 2023, 16, 148 19 of 24
without leaving any residual pillars. To the bottom of the layer in an elementary field
with one room and one technological pillar, there are inclined drifts with an inclination
from 5◦ to 8◦ that allow the movement of mobile machines. The inclined drifts are used
in successive elementary fields, but this requires constant flooring as the front of works
progresses. Then the bottom layer in the field is mined. The orebody is processed with
explosives. Blasting holes in the lower layer are drilled from the floor of the lower layer
(horizontal holes) or the floor of the upper layer (vertical holes).
The roofs of the excavations and the sidewalls are secured using rock bolt support.
After the bottom layer is mined in the elementary field, the filling dams are built in the
room leading to the field and the inclined drift (after partial backfilling), and the post-
exploitation space is filled with hydraulic backfill. The backfill water is discharged through
pipe collectors or workings fenced off in the filling to field settlers. The mining of the
deposit in the next field may take place after the entire scope of liquidation works in
the previous field has been completed. All these works are performed with the use of
self-propelled machines: blast holes are drilled with self-propelled drill trucks; loading
explosives such as saletrol or emulsion is carried out with blasting vehicles, while the
loading of the cartridge materials is carried out manually; the output is loaded and set
aside from the fronts with the use of loading and hauling trucks or cooperating with box
haulage vehicles; the filling material brought in during the selection works is loaded and
put away into the post-exploitation voids using loading and hauling trucks; mechanical
and resin rock bolts with a length of 1.6 m to 2.6 m are made with the use of self-propelled
machines; ripping off the roof and sidewalls is performed mechanically with the use of
trucks equipped with cutters.
5. Discussion
Mining in massive deposits has various challenges, mainly related to great depth,
hard rock, in-rush related to water, and mine stability. Additionally, the mine development
in these environments requires the planning and optimization of several activities to
improve the construction times, mining times, and support requirements. This work has
summarized different underground mining methods applied to massive deposits located
in Chile and Poland.
Underground mining of ore deposits in Chile and Poland is diversified due to the
geological conditions and the exploitation methods used. For the ore deposits located in the
Legnica–Głogów Copper district in Poland, copper and silver are mined together, as well as
zinc and lead (Chrzanow and Olkuski regions). A comparison of the basic geological and
mining parameters is presented in Table 1. Currently, the only exploitation of ore deposits
in Poland is carried out in the Legnica–Głogów Copper district. Mining of Cu–Ag ores in
this region in 2021 amounted to 30 million tonnes of ore with a content of 1.48% Cu and
50.73 g/t Ag, containing 0.443 million tonnes of metallic copper and 1.522 million tonnes
of silver. Exploitation of zinc and lead ore deposits in the Chrzanów region (Trzebionka
mine) and in the Olkusz region (Olkusz–Pomorzany mine) was completed in 2009 and 2020,
respectively. The annual output of zinc and lead ores in 2009 amounted to 2.349 million
tonnes, including 0.089 million tonnes of zinc and 0.034 million tonnes of lead. In 2020, it
was 1.435 million tonnes, including 0.043 million tonnes of zinc and 0.018 million tonnes of
lead. The content of zinc and lead in the ore was 2.6% and 1.3%, respectively.
On the other hand, the deposit in Chine are in different stages. The deposit located
in the Coquimbo region, is under development, and is being designed to mine 2000 tpd
of copper ore with a content of 1.22% Cu containing 2680 million tonnes of cooper. The
deposit located in the Antofagasta region is an open pit to underground transition project
(Table 1). Mining of Cu–Mo ores in this region has 1700 million tonnes of ore with a content
of 0.7% Cu and 450 ppm Mo. The deposit located in the O’Higgins region is a large block
caving project (Table 1) with more than 4500 km of drifts mined from 1905 to date. Mining
of Cu–Mo ores in this region has 2020 million tonnes of ore with a content of 0.86% Cu,
containing several underground exploitation areas including an open pit.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 20 of 24
According to reference [2], mass mining exploitation methods must consider the
mechanical behavior of the rocks and the depth of the deposits. Caving is more difficult to
initiate in competent rock masses and cave progression is typically slower. Furthermore,
the rock mechanics aspects in deep cave mines are more relevant due to the increasing
primary stress magnitudes. There is no common characteristic regarding the quality of
the rock in world-class deposits since their typology and genesis are varied and, therefore,
the host rocks and their characteristics are also varied. Particularly, the porphyry deposits
present their ore generally associated with granodiorites and andesites, on which different
types of alteration due to hydrothermal fluids are superimposed. This alteration implies
the presence of abundant clays, which decrease the resistance of the rock. The depth
at which the ore appears depends largely on the degree of erosion suffered by the rock
mass, although the location of the magmas that give rise to the hydrothermal fluids is
around 2–3 km and even more superficial. In any case, given the large dimensions of the
mineralized bodies, it is common for at least part of them to be found at a considerable
depth for their exploitation.
The mine development in these environments required the planning and optimization
of several activities to improve the construction times and support requirements. This
work summarized some of the activities for different mine deposits and underground
mine methods and designs. In particular, the caving method required minor development
compared with the deposit volume to be mined. However, the caving process implies high
induced stress that must be included in stability. Additionally, the crater of subsidence
generated in the surface due to caving involves an extensive zone. In Chile, a few studies
have evaluated the impact of refilling this zone [61], but to date they have not been
applied. Some of the current tendencies in the Block Caving method are focused on
decreasing the development required and proposed improvement in mine design [62–64].
For example, the last caving projects used wide space extraction level layouts as in the
Chuquicamata underground mine [44] and the Diamante sector of the El Teniente mine [65].
Additionally, in Cadia East in Australia, the undercut level has been omitted, so the caving
was started directly from the extraction level [62]. On the other hand, the Polish mines
described in massive deposits here use more selective underground methods. In these
methods, the development and mining activities are commonly carried out at the same time
(as well as caving propagation and undercutting). The mine planning then involved several
challenges. Additionally, a back-filling process must be used to control the mine stability in
thick deposits with these selective methods due to the large open areas.
For the underground copper ore mines in Poland in the area of LGOM in the coming
years, three fundamental issues will arise with which the mining staff will have to look for
and improve solutions. The first refers to the climatic hazard associated with the primary
temperature of the rock mass. The primary temperature of the rock mass at the level of the
mining excavations (Zechstein bottom level) ranges from 34 ◦ C to 47 ◦ C, with an average
of 39 ◦ C. On the other hand, the geothermal gradient ranges from 2.5 ◦ C to 3 ◦ C for every
100 m. Considering the greater depth of exploitation, the primary temperature of the
rocks will increase, which will make it necessary to ensure the appropriate temperature
for the mining crew by cooling the air temperature. The second issue is closely related
to the decreasing thickness of the selected deposit. For thin deposits below 2 m, mines
currently use split mining methods, trying to minimize dilution and operational losses.
Further reduction of the exploitation gate will be related to the introduction of low-profile
machines while maintaining the current level of extraction. The third issue relates to the
risk of rock bursts. The occurring tremors have a value of 109 J. Therefore, mines are
constantly improving the methods of rock bolt support, capable of absorbing as much
dynamic load energy as possible. In addition, in order to minimize the risk of the crew
staying in hazardous zones, methods for the remote control of mining operations are being
developed, including blasting and bolt hole drilling, as well as loading and haulage of ore
output. Further research works will be closely related to innovative mining technologies
for the increasing level of exploitation.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 21 of 24
Table 1. Comparison of mining and geological parameters for underground mining of selected ore
deposits (copper and silver, zinc and lead) in Chile and Poland.
Chile Poland
Parameter Unit Copper + Molybdenum Copper + Molybdenum
Copper + Silver Zinc + Lead
(Chuquicamata) (El Teniente)
Depth of 100–650
(m) ~1150 800–1300 80–120
exploitation (current level 1)
Annual production (mln tonnes) 50.4 (in regimen) 48.6 30 1.435
(%); 0.77 (copper); 1.28–2.3 (copper); 2.6 (zinc);
Metal content 0.86 (copper)
(g/Mg for silver) 450 (ppm Mo) 54.5–62.5 (silver) 1.3 (lead)
Thin up to 2 m;
~1200 (porphyry
Deposit thickness (m) 250 medium form 2 to 7 m; up to 30 m
diameter in surface)
Thick more than 7 m
The deposit
The form of the Massive with belongs to the type
Massive Lenses and nests
deposit mineralized veins. of stratoid deposits
(pseudo-seam)
Deposit inclination (◦ ) - - about 8 about 5
Decline and
Access Tunnels Tunnels Vertical shafts
vertical shafts
The shape of
Rectangular with a
preparatory and Horseshoe Horseshoe Trapezoidal
flat or oval roof
mining excavations
Rock burst; water;
rock and gas
Rock burst; Rck burst; outburst; roof falls;
Natural hazards Water
collapses; spalling collapses; mudrushes climatic (primary
temperature of rock
mass)
Block caving
Mining methods Block/panel caving Room and Pillar Room and Pillar
(Macroblocks)
Bending of roor
Liquidation of layers with further Hydraulic
Subsidence Subsidence
post-mining space caving; hydraulic backfilling
and dry backfilling
Cartridge (manually loaded); emulsion
Type of explosives ANFO and Emulsion ANFO and emulsion
materials (mechanically loaded)
Shotcrete, cement grout Mechanical and
Shotcrete, cement grout Resin (full column)
Support type rock bolt support (helical resin (full column)
rock bolt support, mesh rock bolt support.
and split set), mesh rock bolt support.
Cable up to 8 m;
Shotcrete over mesh, wooden cribs; arch Wooden cribs; arch
Shotcrete with syntetic
shotcrete with fibet, yieldig support; yieldig support;
Additional support fiber, concrete walls,
concrete walls, cable steel and wooden wooden props;
cable bolts, steel frames
bolts, steel frames props; geosynthetic steel grids
and steel grids
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, K.S. and R.G.; methodology, R.G., K.Z. and A.Z.; formal
analysis, K.S., R.G. and K.Z.; investigation, K.Z., A.Z. and R.G.-E.; resources, K.S.; writing—original
draft preparation, R.G., K.Z. and R.G.-E.; writing—review and editing, K.S. and A.Z.; visualization,
R.G., K.Z. and A.Z.; supervision, K.S.; project administration, K.S. and R.G.; funding acquisition, K.S.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was partially funded by CONICYT/PIA Project AFB220002 and AGH
University of Science and Technology in Poland, scientific subsidy under number: 16.16.100.215.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 22 of 24
References
1. Nordlund, E. Preface of Mass Min 2008 Proceedings. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå,
Sweden, 9–11 June 2008.
2. Ladinig, T.; Wimmer, M.; Wagner, H. Raise Caving: A Novel Mining Method for (Deep) Mass Mining. In Proceedings of the Fifth
International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 30 August–1 September 2022; pp. 651–666.
3. Rybak, J.M.; Kongar-Syuryun, C.; Tyulyaeva, Y.; Khayrutdinov, A.M.; Akinshin, I. Geomechanical substantiation of parameters of
technology for mining salt deposits with a backfill. Min. Sci. 2021, 28, 19–32. [CrossRef]
4. Khayrutdinov, A.M.; Kongar-Syuryun, C.B.; Kowalik, T.; Tyulyaeva, Y.S. Stress-strain behavior control in rock mass using
different-strength backfill. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020, 10, 42–55. [CrossRef]
5. Kongar-Syuryun, C.; Ubysz, A.; Faradzhov, V. Models and algorithms of choice of development technology of deposits when
selecting the composition of the backfilling mixture. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 684, 012008. [CrossRef]
6. Singer, D.A. World class base and precious metal deposits; a quantitative analysis. Econ. Geol. 1995, 90, 88–104. [CrossRef]
7. Laznicka, P. Quantitative relationships among giant deposits of metals. Econ. Geol. 1999, 94, 455–473. [CrossRef]
8. Robert, F.; Poulsen, K.H. World-class Archean hydrothermal gold deposits: A Canadian perspective. Geol. Soc. Aust. Abstr. 1996,
41, 368.
9. Yang, Z.M.; Cooke, D.R. Porphyry copper deposits in China. In Mineral Deposits of China, Society of Economic Geologists; Zhaoshan,
C., Richards, G., Eds.; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2019; pp. 133–187. Available online: https://eprints.
utas.edu.au/32587/ (accessed on 18 December 2022).
10. Redwood, S.D. The mineral deposits of Panama: Arc metallogenesis on the trailing edge of the Caribbean large igneous province.
Boletin de la Soc. Geol. Mex. 2020, 72, A130220. [CrossRef]
11. Tabelin, C.B.; Park, I.; Phengsaart, T.; Jeon, S.; Villacorte-Tabelin, M.; Alonzo, D.; Yoo, K.; Ito, M.; Hiroyoshi, N. Copper and
critical metals production from porphyry ores and E-wastes: A review of resource availability, processing/recycling challenges,
socio-environmental aspects, and sustainability issues. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 170, 105610. [CrossRef]
12. Hao, H.; Park, J.-W.; Campbell, I.H. Role of magma differentiation depth in controlling the Au grade of giant porphyry deposits.
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2022, 593, 117640. [CrossRef]
13. Chiaradia, M.; Caricchi, L. Supergiant porphyry copper deposits are failed large eruptions. Commun. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 117864.
[CrossRef]
14. Brown, A.C. World-class sediment-hosted stratiform copper deposits: Characteristics, genetic concepts and metallotects. Aust. J.
Earth Sci. 1997, 44, 317–328. [CrossRef]
15. Sillitoe, R.H. Copper provinces. Soc. Econ. Geol. 2012, 16, 1–18.
16. Cooke, D.R.; Hollings, P.; Walshe, J.L. Giant porphyry deposits: Characteristics, distribution, and tectonic controls. Econ. Geol.
2005, 100, 801–818. [CrossRef]
17. del Real, I.; Thompson, J.; Simon, A.C.; Reich, M. Geochemical and Isotopic Signature of Pyrite as a Proxy for Fluid Source and
Evolution in the Candelaria-Punta del Cobre Iron Oxide Copper-Gold District, Chile. Econ. Geol. 2020, 115, 1493–1518. [CrossRef]
18. Zamora, A. Geología Proyecto Las Luces; Internal report; Compañía Minera Las Cenizas: Cabildo, Chile, 2011.
19. Cabral, A.R.; Beaudoin, G. Volcanic red-bed copper mineralisation related to submarine basalt alteration, Mont Alexandre,
Quebec Appalachians, Canada. Miner. Depos. 2007, 42, 901–912. [CrossRef]
20. López, J. M Geología y Microtermometría del Yacimiento Estratoligado Don Gabriel. Comuna de Salamanca, Región de Coquimbo,
Chile. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile, 2010.
21. Maksaev, V. Chilean Strata-Bound Cu-(Ag) Deposits: An Overview. In Hydrothermal Iron Oxide Copper-Gold and Related Deposits: A
Global Perspective; Porter, T.M., Ed.; Publishers Group Canada: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2002; pp. 185–205.
22. MTV. Minera Tres Valles Copper Project, Salamanca, Coquimbo, Chile; NI43–101 Technical Report; Minera Tres Valles Sprott Resource
Holdings Inc.: Coquimbo, Chile, 2018.
23. Boric, R.; Holmgren, C.; Wilson, N.S.F. The Geology of the El Soldado Manto type Cu (Ag) Deposit, Central Chile. In Hydrothermal
Iron Oxide Copper-Gold and Related Deposits: A global Perspective; Porter, T.M., Ed.; Publishers Group Canada: Vancouver, BC,
Canada, 2002; pp. 163–184.
24. Movahednia, M.; Maghfouri, S.; Fazli, N.; Rastad, E.; Ghaderi, M.; González, F.J. Metallogeny of Manto-type Cu-(Ag) mineraliza-
tion in Iran: Relationship with Neo-Tethyan evolution and implications for future exploration. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 149, 105064.
[CrossRef]
25. Cox, D.P.; Lindsey, D.A.; Singer, D.A.; Moring, B.C.; Diggles, M.F. Sediment-Hosted Copper Deposits of the World: Deposit
Models and Database. Sci. Chang. World 2003. Available online: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-107/ (accessed on
18 December 2022).
26. Hitzman, M.; Kirkham, R.; Broughton, D.; Thorson, J.; Selley, D. The Sediment-Hosted Stratiform Copper Ore System. Econ. Geol.
2005, 609–642. [CrossRef]
27. Oszczepalski, S.; Speczik, S.; Zieliński, K.; Chmielewski, A. The Kupferschiefer Deposits and Prospects in SW Poland: Past,
Present and Future. Minerals 2019, 9, 592. [CrossRef]
28. De Vos, W.; Batista, M.J.; Demetriades, A.; Duris, M.; Lexa, J.; Lis, J.; Marsina, K.; O’Connor, P.J. Metallogenic mineral provinces
and world class ore deposits in Europe. Geochem. Atlas Eur. 2005, 1, 43–49.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 23 of 24
29. Sass-Gustkiewicz, M.; Kwiecinska, B. Organic matter in the Upper Silesian (mississippi valley-type) deposits, Poland. Econ. Geol.
1999, 94, 981–992. [CrossRef]
30. Paradis, S.; Hannigan, P.; Dewing, K. Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Deposits. In Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis
of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods; Goodfellow, W.D., Ed.;
Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposit Division: St. John’s, NL, USA, 2007; pp. 185–203.
31. Szuwarzyński, M. Ore bodies in the Silesian-Cracow Zn-Pb ore district, Poland. Pol. Geol. Inst. Spec. Pap. 1996, 154, 9–24.
32. Kurek, S. Problems of modelling of Zn-Pb ores of the Mississippi Valley-type in the sediments of the Younger Paleozoic. Geol. Q.
1993, 37, 147–156.
33. Gómez, R.; Labbé, E. Una opción para el paso a la minería subterránea masiva: La actual metodología aplicada en Chile del
“block caving”. Bol. Inst. Geol. 2019, 130, 181–198. [CrossRef]
34. Araneda, O. Codelco: Present, Future and Excellence in Projects. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference &
Exhibition on Mass Mining 2020, Virtual, 9–11 December 2020; pp. 1–9.
35. Arancibia, E.; Flores, G. Design for Underground Mining at Chuquicamata Orebody, Scoping Engineering Stage. In Proceedings
of the International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining 2004, Santiago, Chile, 22–25 August 2004; pp. 603–608.
36. Villa, D.; Baraqui, J.; Maass, S. Papomono Mine Modelled as an Inclined Cave. In Proceedings of the Eighth International
Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining 2020, Virtual, 9–11 December 2020; pp. 182–194.
37. Laubscher, D.H. Cave mining-the state of the art. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 1994, 94, 279–293.
38. Edwin, E.T.; Brown, T. Block Caving Geomechanics, 2nd ed.; Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre: Indooroopilly, QL,
Australia, 2007.
39. Flores, G. Future Challenges and Why Cave Mining Must Change. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Block
and Sublevel Caving, Santiago, Chile, 5–6 June 2014; pp. 23–52.
40. Fairhurst, C. Some challenges of deep mining. Engineering 2017, 3, 527–537. [CrossRef]
41. Tshisens, J.N.; Moss, A.; Sullivan, M.; Yuniar, A.; Casten, T.; Zimmer, C. Organising for the Successful Management of Complex
Underground Caving Mines. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Adelaide, SA,
Australia, 30 August–1 September 2022; pp. 81–94.
42. Sillitoe, R. Epochs of intrusion-related copper mineralization in the Andes. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 1988, 1, 89–108. [CrossRef]
43. Barra, F.; Alcota, H.; Rivera, S.; Valencia, V.; Munizaga, F.; Maksaev, V. Timing and formation of porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization
in the Chuquicamata district, northern Chile: New constraints from the Toki cluster. Miner. Deposita 2013, 48, 629–651. [CrossRef]
44. Flores, G.; Catalan, A. A transition from a large open pit into a novel “macroblock variant” block caving geometry at Chuquicamata
mine, Codelco Chile. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2018, 11, 549–561. [CrossRef]
45. Arancibia, E.; Carrasco, F.; Fuentes, G.; Guarda, J. Design of Extraction Layout for the Chuquicamata Underground Mine Project.
In Proceedings of the International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining 2008, Luleå Sweden, 9–11 June 2008; pp. 3–14.
46. Mühlenbrock, K.; Silva, D.; Navarrete, R.; Mardonez, L. Construction of the First Macro Block at the Chuquicamata Underground
Project. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, the Eighth International Conference
& Exhibition on Mass Mining 2020, Virtual, 9–11 December 2020; pp. 127–139.
47. Mülhembrock, K. Preparación Minera GRMD. Concepción 2022, 47.
48. Cannell, J.; Cooke, D.R.; Walshe, J.L.; Stein, H. Geology, Mineralization, Alteration, and Structural Evolution of the El Teniente
Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit. Econ. Geol. 2005, 100, 979–1003. [CrossRef]
49. Brzovic, A.; Villaescusa, E. Rock mass characterization and assessment of block-forming geological discontinuities during caving
of primary copper ore at the El Teniente mine, Chile. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2007, 44, 565–583. [CrossRef]
50. Castro, R.; Garces, D.; Brzovic, A.; Armijo, F. Quantifying Wet Muck Entry Risk for Long-term Planning in Block Caving. Rock
Mech. Rock Eng. 2018, 51, 2965–2978. [CrossRef]
51. Pozo, R.; Díaz, G.; Medina, O. Centro Integrado de Construcción en Obras de Minería Subterránea, Proyecto Nuevo Nivel
Mina El Teniente. In Proceedings of the UMining 2016, 1er Congreso Internacional en Minería Subterránea, Santiago, Chile,
19–21 October 2016; pp. 299–312.
52. Ritter, C. Effect of Constructability in Underground Mining under High Stress Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de
Concepción, Concepción, Chile, 2018. (In Spanish).
53. Kurek, T. Perspectives of Development of Zn-Pb ore Exploitation in the Safety Pillars of ‘Trzebionka’ Mine’; AGH: Kraków, Poland, 1987.
(In Polish)
54. Piechota, S. Basic principles of the exploitation of thick ore deposits. Ores Non Ferr. Met. 1973, 18, 172–177. (In Polish)
55. Roszkowski, J.; Piechota, S. About some problems of the exploitation of zinc-lead ore deposits. Ores Non Ferr. Met. 1979, 24, 472–478.
56. Skrzypkowski, K. Decreasing Mining Losses for the Room and Pillar Method by Replacing the Inter-Room Pillars by the
Construction of Wooden Cribs Filled with Waste Rocks. Energies 2020, 13, 3564. [CrossRef]
57. Skrzypkowski, K. Comparative Analysis of the Mining Cribs Models Filled with Gangue. Energies 2020, 13, 5290. [CrossRef]
58. Piechota, S. Development of copper ore mining methods in LGOM region. Bull. Polish Geol. Inst. 2007, 423, 23–43. (In Polish)
59. Piechota, S.; Stopyra, M.; Poborska-Młynarska, K. Systemy Podziemnej Eksploatacji Złóż W˛egla Kamiennego, Rud i Soli; AGH: Kraków,
Poland, 2009. (In Polish)
60. Burta, J. Eksploatacja Złoża Rud Miedzi w Warunkach Zagrożenia T˛
apaniami i Zawałami; KGHM Cuprum sp. z o.o. Centrum Badawczo—
Rozwojowe: Wrocław, Poland, 2010.
Energies 2023, 16, 148 24 of 24
61. Armijo, F.; Irribarra, S.; Castro, R. Experimental Study of Fines Migration for Caving Mines. In Proceedings of the 3rd International
Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Santiago, Chile, 5–6 June 2014; pp. 356–362.
62. Paredes, P.; Popa, I.; Kline, P.; Sykes, M. Undercutless caving at Newcrest: Towards the Next Generation of Cave Mining. In
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining 2020, Virtual, 9–11 December 2020; pp. 166–181.
63. Le-Feaux, R.; Castro, R.; Cortez, D.; Gómez, R.; Silva, D. A hybrid extraction level layout design for block caving. Min. Technol.
2021, 131, 51–65. [CrossRef]
64. Paredes, P. Evaluation of the Effect of Wider-Spaced Layouts in Recovery for High Column Block Caves. In Proceedings of the Caving
2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 30 August–1 September 2022; pp. 393–416.
65. Cornejo, J.; Meléndez, M.; Lasagna, G.; Bustamante, D.; Castro, R.; Arancibia, L.; Gúzman, D. Design at Drawpoint Spacing at
Diamante Project—El Teniente Mine. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining 2020,
Virtual, 9–11 December 2020; pp. 761–772.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction
prohibited without permission.