LT 2023 Oct-Nov p1 Ms
LT 2023 Oct-Nov p1 Ms
LT 2023 Oct-Nov p1 Ms
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Working
Where a final answer is underlined in the mark scheme, full marks are awarded for a correct answer,
regardless of whether there is any supporting working, unless an exception is noted in the mark
scheme.
For partial credit, the evidence needed to award the mark will usually be shown on its own line in the
mark scheme, or else will be defined in italic text.
For explanations and verbal justifications, apply the principle of ‘words to that effect’.
No response
If there is any attempt at a solution award 0 marks not NR. “-” or “?” constitute no attempt at a
solution.
Abbreviations
Annotations
Where the answer is underlined in the mark scheme, and a candidate’s correct final answer is both
clear and clearly identified (encircled, underlined etc.), it is not necessary to annotate that item; nor is
it necessary to annotate when there is No Response.
Where there is a response that scores 0, either SEEN should be used, or some other annotation(s) to
indicate why no marks can be awarded (Caret, TE, NGE, Cross).
Partial credit should be indicated with a 1 (or, occasionally, a 2) at the point at which that mark has
been earned.
Correct item
Incorrect item
Benefit of doubt
Transcription error
Special case
1(a)(i) 62 1
1(a)(iii) Eagle 1
2 55 2
3 The difference between her winning total (116) and her total number of 2
correct answers (72) is 44 [1]
The only combination that works is 16 2 + 12
History: 3 points; Geography: 2 points
4(b) The journey home will cost $0.80 + 14 $0.70 [1] = $10.60 2
The journey to the party will still be cheaper on the bus, costing $3.50
$14.10
SC: 1 mark for answer 275 from 5 rows increasing by 11 each time
OR
Algebraic:
S = standard price N = non-standard price
300(0.7S) +900S + 200N = 1400S [1]
N = 1.45S
45%
6 The first cycle makes a profit of $15 and the second cycles makes a profit of 2
$13 [1]
Each subsequent cycle makes $2 less in profit, so the process is no longer
profitable after 8 cycles
OR
7(a)(ii) No 2
Eve must score at least 2 more points/37 points [1]
Fay can score at most 36 [1]
7(c) Joy scored 5 points each time OR Ian scored 10, 8, 6, 3, 2 and 1 [1] 2
Only 4 points was not scored by either of them, which is fifth position
8 ar&7249Q6 [1] 3
The second version (is shorter so) is missing a character so otherwise must
be correct [1]
The first version has a Y instead of 9, so & must be correct [1]
OR
ar&7249Q6 [1]
The second version doesn’t have a symbol, (so that must be its error and)
so the & in the first version must be correct [1]
So the Y in the first version must be its error, and should be a 9 [1]
10(a) 1 mark for finding the time for both of the distances at one of the speeds 3
OR for finding the time for one of the distances at all of the speeds
The 3 km route is run at 7.5 km/h and the 3.6 km route is run at 9 km/h [1]
10(b) Reduced speed by a third: 3 km/h, 4 km/h, 5 km/h and 6 km/h [1] 2
OR
OR
11(c)(ii) $278 1
12 If Ian only had the money for participation and Barbara walked 10 km then Ian 4
would raise $56 and Barbara $315, so Barbara would have raised $259 more
[1]
For each extra kilometre that they both walked the difference would reduce by
$15 [1]
To reduce the difference by $240 would require 16 km extra to be walked [1]
Total raised is $56 + $315 + 16 × ($41 + $26) =
$1443
Algebraic:
If Ian walks d km:
19 + 56 + 41d = 55 + 26(d + 10) [2]
1 mark for either side correct
d = 16 [1]
Ian raises $712 and Barbara raises $731, so total is $1443