Thermoelectric Performance of A Single-Layer Graphene Sheet For Energy Harvesting
Thermoelectric Performance of A Single-Layer Graphene Sheet For Energy Harvesting
Thermoelectric Performance of A Single-Layer Graphene Sheet For Energy Harvesting
6, JUNE 2013
Abstract— We investigate the thermoelectric (TE) figure-of- figure-of-merit ZT, which is defined as [3]
merit of a single-layer graphene (SLG) sheet by a physics-
based analytical technique. We first develop analytical models σ S 2B T
ZT = (1)
of electrical and thermal resistances and the Seebeck coefficient κe + κph
of SLG by considering electron interactions with the in-plane
and flexural phonons. Using those models, we show that both where the transport coefficients σ , S B , κe , and κph are the
the figure-of-merit and the TE efficiency can be substantially electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and electron- and
increased with the addition of isotope doping as it significantly phonon-dominated thermal conductivities, respectively. Exten-
reduces the phonon-dominated thermal conductivity. In addition, sive experimental studies [3]–[12] report an improvement of
we report that the TE open circuit output voltage and output ZT by varying the chemical composition and structural con-
power depends weakly on the SLG sheet dimensions and sheet
concentration in the strongly diffusive regime. Proposed models finements of the constituent compounds. Recently TE studies
agree well with the available experimental data and demonstrate on Si nanowires bundles demonstrated a large Voc and power
the immense potential of graphene for waste-heat recovery under a temperature difference of 70 K [12]. This is achieved,
application. however, at the cost of large integration of bundles [11], where
Index Terms— Energy harvesting, graphene, phonons, seebeck the open-circuit voltage (Voc ), ZT, and efficiency (η) “per
coefficient, thermal conductivity, thermoelectric figure of merit. wire” could be very low.
Single-layer graphene (SLG) sheet has demonstrated excel-
lent electrical and thermal conductivities [13], [14]. However,
I. I NTRODUCTION
its potentiality as a TE material by analyzing the ZT and Voc
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
VERMA et al.: THERMOELECTRIC PERFORMANCE OF A SINGLE-LAYER GRAPHENE SHEET 2065
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2066 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 60, NO. 6, JUNE 2013
with the back gate biasing where the gate voltage changes
the Fermi level position. At this point, it should be noted
that the electrical conductivity σ = (L/RW ) is generally
treated by considering a perfect 2-D layer with zero thickness.
It should be carefully noted that SLG is a 2-D material with
respect to electronic transport. The layer has a wall thickness
δ (= 0.34 nm). With respect to electronic transport, (8) is
2-D in nature. However, considering a finite wall-thickness,
the electrical conductivity of graphene is σ = (L/RW δ).
This is also true for realizing the SLG layer thermal resis-
tance, which is given as (L/κph W δ). Additionally, we would
like to state that the authors [28] have recently proposed a
theoretical model for the determination of R by considering
the electron and in-plane and electron and flexural phonons
scatterings. The formulation by the authors in [28] is carried
out under the presence of a longitudinal electric current from Fig. 3. Magnitude of Seebeck coefficient as a function of temperature for
varying n-type 2-D carrier concentration. The symbols are the experimental
the right to left contact [see Fig. 1(a)], which resulted in self- data from [26] with hole concentration of 2 and 2.8 × 1016 m−2 and at 4
heating. However, the analysis as done in this paper reflects and 6 μm widths, respectively. However, because of symmetric band structure
the dependency of R on n 2D via the Landauer transmission about the Dirac point, S B takes the same value for the corresponding electron
concentration. Solid lines: our analytical model.
approach when there is zero applied electrical current. From
Fig. 2, it appears that at low temperature, R follows a linear
relation with T because of the large interaction with the in- T and can span a value from 25 to 110 μV K−1 between an
plane phonons. This behavior is, however, dominated by a n 2D sweep of 0.1–1 × 1017 m−2 at room temperature.
parabolic behavior at higher T due to the emission of infrared To estimate the dimensionless ZT, one should also need
phonons. Following the Mott-Jones relation [29], the Seebeck the temperature-dependent thermal conductivities. It is now
coefficient under high carrier concentration can be written as well known that the thermal conductivity of SLG is entirely
due to the phonons [13]. The contribution from the electrons
π 2 k 2B T 1 ∂G are being poor, which can be evaluated from Landauer for-
SB = (10)
3e G ∂E E=E F malism as κe = (16/27h 2 )(λ2D (E F )/L)(E 3F /v F T ) for an
average energy of (2/3)E F and gives a value of about κe =
in which G = (1/R) is the electrical conductance. Substituting 0.12 W m−1 K−1 at 300 K for n 2D = 1017 m−2 , L = 5 μm
the value of R, S B can be written as and W = 4 μm. Thus it becomes straightforward to derive
π 2 k 2B T (E F ) M (E F ) the phonon contribution to the thermal conductivity, which
SB = + (11) lies in the range of 600–7000 W m−1 K−1 with a phonon
3e (E F ) M (E F )
mean free path of about 775 nm (for 2000 W m−1 K−1 ) at
where the primes denotes the differentiation with respect to room temperature [30]–[32]. Recently, Verma et al. [33] have
energy, ( (E F )/ (E F )) = (2λ2D (E F )/πv F )[(D/E 2F )−C], shown an analytical model of thermal conductivity of SLG
and (M (E F )/M (E F )) = (1/E F ) in which the coeffi- sheet, which is based on the quadratic dispersion relation of the
cients C and D can be evaluated from (5) and (6) as flexural phonon wave vector. The authors used an anharmonic
(1/τ (E F )) = C E F + (D/E F ). Thus, it seems that in the second-order three-phonon Umklapp, the edge roughness, and
strong diffusive regime, S B becomes independent of the sheet isotopic scatterings to demonstrate the variation of the thermal
dimension. However, in the near ballistic regime, (E) = conductivity with temperature. It should be noted that the
(λ2D (E)/(λ2D (E) + L)) and under such conditions, S B starts isotopic scatterings in the present case mainly arise because
depending on the sheet length. Fig. 3 exhibits the varia- of the addition of C13 isotopes on C12 , which makes the
tion of the magnitude of S B with respect to T at different sheet impure. Using these rates, it is exhibited by the authors
sheet concentration. The sheet dimensions were chosen to be that κph follows a T 1.5 and T −2 law at lower and higher
5 × 4 μm2 to compare with the experimental data from temperatures in the absence of C13 isotopes, respectively.
[26]. These data has been taken at 300 K under the hole In their presence, however, the κph sharply deviates from the
concentration of 2 and 2.8 × 1016 m−2 and at 4 and 6 μm T −2 law at higher T . In these analyses, we incorporate this
widths, respectively. Although the data seems to be different analytical model of κph which can be written as [33]
for different widths, Grosse et al. [26] agreed that for wider −1 −1 −1
κph = κph + κph (12)
devices, S B stands independent of W . It is evident that the low high
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
VERMA et al.: THERMOELECTRIC PERFORMANCE OF A SINGLE-LAYER GRAPHENE SHEET 2067
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2068 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 60, NO. 6, JUNE 2013
that higher the ZT, higher the η. It appears from Fig. 7 that at a
sheet concentration of 1016 m−2 , the efficiency reaches around Figs. 9 and 10. The rate of variation of power with TH is sim-
3.2% when the other SLG end is at 500 K. These ZT and η ilar to that of Fig. 8 with larger power output for larger widths
values can be compared with the MD and NEGF solutions and smaller lengths in the diffusive regime. We see that almost
for nanoribbons of graphene [15]–[18], which is considered 0.7 μW output power can be achieved from 1×5 μm2 at 100 K
without incorporating these necessary electron and phonon temperature difference. As seen from Fig. 10, however, there is
scatterings. The short-circuit current Isc as function of TH no significant variation of the power over carrier concentration
and sheet concentration is shown in Fig. 8. It should be noted at higher lengths. The variation trend is certainly not similar
that the main assumption we considered in this analysis is the to what is observed for other materials where the power factor
negligible resistance because of the two contacts at the ends. σ S 2B exhibits a maxima. This is a clear advantage of using SLG
However, this can be achieved experimentally through careful sheet over the TE conventional nanomaterials. At this point,
selection of contact materials. It can be seen that with the it is worth mentioning that the ballistic values of R, S B , and
increase in the length, Isc decreases. This is due to the increase κph are (h/2e2 M(E F )), (π 2 k 2B T /3eE F ), and (4π 2 k 2B T /3h)
in the SLG resistance with length. The open circuit voltage in respectively, which gives ZT = (M(E F )/18)(k B T /E F )2 and
this case remains almost dimensional independent as shown in |Voc | = (π 2 k 2B /6eE F )(TH2 − TL2 ). it should be noted that
Fig. 6. We see that with the increase in the width, Isc increases obtaining a ZT of the order of 1 or even greater for T = 450 K
up to a value near 200 μA for a temperature difference of is an extremely challenging task [3], [4]. In this case, however,
100 K even at an extreme concentration of 1017 m−2 . One can SLG exhibits a dramatically superior ZT, Voc , and η values
also notice that Isc also exhibits an increased variation with even in the presence of electron and in-plane and ZA phonon
n 2D . The power delivered for similar condition is shown in scatterings because of the very high σ , S B , and a controllable
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
VERMA et al.: THERMOELECTRIC PERFORMANCE OF A SINGLE-LAYER GRAPHENE SHEET 2069
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2070 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 60, NO. 6, JUNE 2013
[25] K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, J. Hone, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Rekha Verma (S’12) is currently pursuing the Ph.D.
“Temperature-dependent transport in suspended graphene,” Phys. Rev. degree in electrothermal transport in 1-D and 2-D
Lett., vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 096802-1–096802-4, 2008. layered materials for applications in interconnects
[26] K. L. Grosse, M.-H. Bae, F. Lian, E. Pop, and W. P. King, “Nanoscale and thermoelectric devices at the Department of
Joule heating, Peltier cooling and current crowding at graphene-metal Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of
contacts,” Nature Nanotechnol., vol. 6, pp. 287–290, Apr. 2011. Science, Bangalore, India.
[27] C. Jeong, R. Kim, M. Luisier, S. Datta, and M. Lundstrom, “On Lan-
dauer versus Boltzmann and full band versus effective mass evaluation
of thermoelectric transport coefficients,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 107, no. 2,
pp. 023707-1–023707-7, 2010.
[28] R. Verma, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Mahapatra, “Physics-based solution
for electrical resistance of graphene under self-heating effect,” IEEE
Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 502–505, Jan. 2013.
[29] N. F. Mott and H. Jones, The Theory of the Properties of Metals and
Sitangshu Bhattacharya (M’13) received the M.Sc.
Alloys. London, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1936.
degree from the University of Calcutta, Kolkata,
[30] D. L. Nika, E. P. Pokatilov, and A. A. Balandin, “Theoretical description India, in 2003, and the Ph.D. degree from Jadavpur
of thermal transport in graphene: The issues of phonon cut-off frequen- University, Jadavpur, India, in 2009.
cies and polarization branches,” Phys. Status Sol. B, vol. 248, no. 11, He is currently a DST Inspire Faculty Member and
pp. 2609–2614, 2011. Assistant Professor at Shiv Nadar University, Dadri,
[31] D. L. Nika and A. A. Balandin, “Two-dimensional phonon trans- India.
port in graphene,” J. Phys., Condens. Matter, vol. 24, no. 23,
pp. 233203-1–233203-18, 2012.
[32] D. L. Nika, S. Ghosh, E. P. Pokatilov, and A. A. Balandin, “Lattice ther-
mal conductivity of graphene flakes: Comparison with bulk graphite,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 94, no. 20, pp. 203103-1–203103-3, 2009.
[33] R. Verma, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Mahapatra, “A physics-based flex-
ural phonon dependent thermal conductivity model for single layer
graphene,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 01509-1–01509-6, Santanu Mahapatra (M’08–SM’10) received the
2013. Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the
[34] S. Chen, Q. Wu, C. Mishra, J. Kang, H. Zhang, K. Cho, W. Cai, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lau-
A. A. Balandin, and R. S. Ruoff, “Thermal conductivity of isotopically sanne, Switzerland, in 2005.
modified graphene,” Nature Mater., vol. 11, pp. 203–207, Jan. 2012. He is currently an Associate Professor with the
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
[35] J. Xue, J. S. Yamagishi, D. Bulmash, P. Jacquod, A. Deshpande,
K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. J. Herrero, and B. J. LeRoy, “Scan-
ning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy of ultra-flat graphene
on hexagonal boron nitride,” Nature Mater., vol. 10, pp. 282–285,
Feb. 2011.
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on September 21,2023 at 10:40:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.