Geometrical description of

photons, electrons and

composite particles.
Dimensional analysis of
electrical charge.
Quantum gravity,
gravitational frequency
spectrum, mass oscillator
synchronization, spectral
energy density modulation
and phase conjugation.
Origin of charge, fine
structure constant and
inertia. Prospects for
wave-based EM
propulsion.

Quantum Wave Mechanics

by Larry Reed

Order the complete book from the publisher Booklocker.com

https://www.booklocker.com/p/books/10176.html?s=pdf
or from your favorite neighborhood
or online bookstore.
 To my parents who never knew the result of their great experiment

Copyright © 2019, 2020, 2022 by Larry J. Reed

All rights reserved.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the author.

Printed on acid-free paper.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018901065

ISBN: 978-1-63492-964-6 paperback

To order additional copies of this book, contact:

www.booklocker.com
 CONTENTS

Preface ........................................................................................................................... ix

SECTION 1 – LIGHT

1. Photon model ................................................................................................................. 1

2. Quantum vacuum......................................................................................................... 13
3. Electromagnetic 4-Potential ........................................................................................ 25
4. Soliton confinement..................................................................................................... 35
5. Electromagnetic field dimensions ............................................................................... 37
6. Electromagnetic spectrum ........................................................................................... 45
7. Curvature and torsion .................................................................................................. 50
8. Polarization effects in a dielectric medium ................................................................. 53
9. Reflectors and dielectric lenses ................................................................................... 60
10. Deflection of light........................................................................................................ 76
11. Origin of inertia ........................................................................................................... 83
11.1 Trapped waves in a standing wave resonator ................................................ 83
11.2 Confined light ................................................................................................ 83
11.3 Contracted standing waves in motion ............................................................ 93
12. Electromagnetic wave propagation ............................................................................. 95
13. Standing wave transformations ................................................................................ 101
14. Phase-locked resonators with phase conjugate wave reflectors .............................. 111
15. Phase conjugate resonator experimental potential ................................................... 116
16. Planck aether............................................................................................................. 132

SECTION 2 – ELECTRICITY

17. Electron model .......................................................................................................... 148

18. Pair production and annihilation ............................................................................. 208
19. Coulomb’s law ......................................................................................................... 225
19.1 Electrostatics .............................................................................................. 225
19.2 Generalization of Coulomb’s law ............................................................. 226
20. Origin of the Electron fine structure constant α ...................................................... 228
20.1 Background ................................................................................................. 228
20.2 Electron charge-to-mass ratio ..................................................................... 230
20.3 Thomas precession ...................................................................................... 231
20.4 Electron stability ......................................................................................... 235
21. Electric charge .......................................................................................................... 239
21.1 Dimensions of electric charge .................................................................... 239
21.2 Electrical charge characteristics of elementary particles ........................... 247
21.3 Relation of electric charge to topological charge ....................................... 249
22. Complex numbers ..................................................................................................... 258
23. Phasors ..................................................................................................................... 263
24. Quaternions ............................................................................................................... 265

v
 Contents

25. Spinors ...............................................................................................................................267

26. Topological charge .............................................................................................................269
27. Bound particle states .........................................................................................................278
27.1 Multiple electron and positron states ....................................................................278
27.2. Gluon fields...........................................................................................................288
27.3 Neutrinos ...............................................................................................................299
28. Lagrangian ..........................................................................................................................305
29. Hamiltonian ........................................................................................................................307
30. Laplacian ............................................................................................................................309
30.1 Wave function curvature.......................................................................................309
30.2 Laplace equilibrium surfaces ................................................................................310
30.3 Laplace transforms................................................................................................311
31. Tensors ...............................................................................................................................315
32. Nonuniform force fields .....................................................................................................318
32.1 Dielectrophoretic force .........................................................................................318
32.2 Van der Waals forces ............................................................................................321
32.3 Magnetophoretic force ..........................................................................................322
32.4 Electromagnetic Magnus effect ............................................................................323
32.5 Ponderomotive (radiation pressure) force ............................................................323
32.6 Traveling wave electromagnetic fields .................................................................323

SECTION 3 – GRAVITY

33. Gravitation ..........................................................................................................................328

33.1 Gravity of the matter .............................................................................................328
33.2 Newton’s law of gravitation .................................................................................330
33.3 Gravitational flux intensity ...................................................................................332
33.4 Comparison of gravity and electricity ..................................................................333
33.5 Kepler’s laws ........................................................................................................345
33.6 N-body gravitation ................................................................................................348
34. Gravitation as a harmonic phenomena ...............................................................................349
35. Gravitational frequency domain .........................................................................................357
36. Mass scaling .......................................................................................................................359
37. Generalized Newtonian gravitational law ..........................................................................361
38. Gravitational potential ........................................................................................................363
39. Gravitational gamma ..........................................................................................................372
40. Newton’s second law..........................................................................................................374
41. Gravitational constant.........................................................................................................378
41.1 Newtonian gravitation constant G ........................................................................378
41.2 Gravitational G as a function of gamma...............................................................381
41.3 Gravitational G as a function of permittivity .......................................................383
42. Newtonian gravitational force equation .............................................................................388
42.1 Gravitational force between electrons ..................................................................388
42.2 Relation between electrostatic force and gravitational force ...............................394
42.3 Gravitational force as a function of capacitance ..................................................395
42.4 Force of gravity as a residual Coulomb force ......................................................396
42.5 Imbalance force between dipoles .........................................................................397
42.6 Gravitational vector potential ...............................................................................399

vi
 Contents

43. Einstein field equation ........................................................................................................401

44. Quantum gravity .................................................................................................................407
44.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................407
44.2 Quantum diagrams ................................................................................................408
45. Graviton model ...................................................................................................................413
46. Nonlinear gravitational field ..............................................................................................419
47. Gravitational field of mass in motion .................................................................................424
47.1 Mass current ..........................................................................................................424
48. Wavefront (Moiré) interference patterns ...........................................................................426
48.1 General ..................................................................................................................426
48.2 Fresnel zones .........................................................................................................426
49. Gravitational frequency redshift.........................................................................................445
49.1 Photon frequency ..................................................................................................445
49.2 Gravitational time dilation ....................................................................................447
49.3 Frequency shift differential...................................................................................447
49.4 Phase shift differential ..........................................................................................448
50. Gravitational frequency spectrum ......................................................................................450
50.1 Gravitational frequency range ..............................................................................450
50.2 Fourier spectral analysis of Earth’s gravitational spectrum .................................451
51. Coupled oscillators .............................................................................................................457
51.1 Oscillator synchronization ....................................................................................457
51.2 Frequency arrhythmia ...........................................................................................463
51.3 Constant velocity (inertial frame)…………………………………………… ....463
51.4 Constant acceleration (Rindler frame)………………………………… .............470
51.5 Oscillator arrays…………………………………………………………… .......482
51.6 Standing wave levitation and propulsion…………………………………….. ...483
52. Antigravity……………………………………………………… .....................................502
52.1 Alteration of gravitational potential.................................... ................................502
52.2 Spectral energy density modulation .....................................................................511
52.3 Speculative design exercise ..................................................................................532
52.4 Engineering the vacuum .......................................................................................592
53. Gravitation tonality .............................................................................................................601
54. Visualization of dimensional relationships ........................................................................623
54.1 Ontological structure.............................................................................................623
54.2 Dimensional conversions ......................................................................................624
54.3 Graphical representations .....................................................................................663
54.4 Creation of the universe ........................................................................................673

References....................................................................................................................................678

Index ............................................................................................................................................685

vii
Preface
This book attempts an explanation and geometrical description of a quantum field theory
of light, electric charge, and gravity. Understanding the fundamental nature and interactions
of such quantum fields is facilitated with knowledge of wave phenomena and physical
properties of the vacuum that enable wave propagation. All light and matter is composed of
quanta that share a fundamental characteristic in that they are composed of quanta that spin
and with spin angular momentum of only certain discrete multiples of Planck’s quantum
constant h (integer spin bosons and half-interger spin fermions). Why does this manifest,
highly localized, quantized spin wave effect occur and how does it result in concentrated
energy in the form of matter? The estimated quantum mechanical energy content of the
vacuum (10113 J/m3) is vastly larger by ~122 orders of magnitude than the energy contained
in the observable universe (10-9 J/m3) composed of fermions and bosons. What accounts for
this incredible mismatch in the minute fraction of energy in that we can directly perceive
and experience (i.e., quanta with spin) and vacuum energy (fluctuations without spin) that
which is inaccessible to observation? Just what are photons, electrons, and gravitons? How
are they created from the seeming void of the vacuum, and how do they interact? Why is
the speed limit of the universe set at a certain finite velocity of light? What exactly is
electric charge? What is mass? How does mass interaction result in gravitational attraction?
We seek an explanation for such phenomena, not just an ad hoc label description without
visualization. Several interrelated themes are developed in terms of wave phenomena,
energy density gradients, spin waves, and quantum effects in a physical vacuum. The
subject matter and concepts discussed are necessarily speculative but are founded on known
wave-mechanics principles. Major themes addressed include the following:

Light. A freely propagating photon wavetrain or light quanta in empty space is described
as a helical traveling electromagnetic wave of quantized spin angular momentum moving at
the velocity of light semper et ubique. Photons are classified as integer spin bosons. The
physical vacuum as a polarizable medium enables wave propagation and appears ultimately
to be quantized at the Planck scale. In the Winterberg Planck aether hypothesis, the vacuum
is a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) superfluid composed of positive and negative Planck
mass dipoles. Fundamental particles such as the photon and the electron are viewed as
polarized quasi-particle wave excitations of much smaller Planck particles. Electromagnetic
waves are conjectured to consist of spin density waves of Planck dipoles enabling
formation of kink or antikink solitons. Similar to the exotic properties of supercooled 3He
BEC liquid helium superfluid, spin waves are not tolerated by the vacuum but quickly
become localized and isolated quantized vortices. A BEC condenstate represents a fifth
state of matter in which particles collectively act in coherent waves oscillating in phase at
the same frequency. The formation of electric charge q, magnetic vector potential A,
electric field intensity E, and magnetic field intensity H in a vacuum devoid of matter may
be understood in terms of the spatial and temporal density fluctuations and motion of
Planck dipoles. The speed of light is a function of the Planck energy density of a
polarizable vacuum characterized by the variable index of refraction KPV.
Photons and electrons/positrons may be directly interconverted in high-energy processes
of pair production and annihilation. Any viable model of the photon or electron must
account for this interconvertability. Oscillation of electrons generates electromagnetic
waves. Electrons can resonantly couple with electromagnetic waves. Photons and electrons
can interact, for example, as plasmonic waves of free electrons in a metal surface, in
secondary emission of electrons due to the photoelectric effect as in a photomultiplier, in an

ix
Preface
ionized plasma as plasmons (quanta of electron waves), in a vacuum as in free-electron
lasers, magnetrons, photomultipliers, etc., in photonic-excited condensed matter excitons,
and in absorption of photons in photo-sensitive semiconductor P-N diodes or photon
emission in laser diodes. Absorption of energy of a photon in a semiconductor can be
transferred to an electron as potential energy. Photon emission occurs when the electron
loses potential energy when electron-hole pairs recombine. P-N-P junctions of quantum
dimensions can provide a storage medium for electrons as quantum mechanical standing
wave traps. Photonic devices enable conversion of photons into an electron current and vice
versa to generate an electrical signal or photo signal. Photon interaction with electrons can
result in motion of matter as, for example, in particles suspended in an EM tractor beam by
photophoretic forces in an optical trap.
In addition to frequency and spin, a photon traveling wave disturbance may be described
in terms of curvature and torsion. The straight line motion of a photon in a gravity-free,
zero-curvature vacuum reflects a balance in electric and magnetic energy. A change in
torsion of a photon in an optically dense medium is associated with effective mass. The
processes of electron/positron pair production and annihilation are described in terms of the
geometry of a photon helicoid. During electron/positron pair creation, the increased
curvature k and decreased torsion t of a helical wave train due to Faraday rotation and
Levi-Civita effects results in formation of two counter-rotating loops of opposite
topological charge. Each loop contains two spinors corresponding to poloidal and toroidal
rotation of a toroidal electron and positron spin wave. Electric charge is related to
topological charge associated with precessional rotation and is quantized as a result of
quantization of spin angular momentum described by Planck’s constant ħ (= 2ph).

Mass. Mass is a fundamental, intrinsic property of matter attributed to the interaction of

electromagnetic quantum fields, i.e., a wave interference effect. In the Einstein relation,
mass m = E/c2 where E is energy and c = the celerity of light. Energy is a measure of
wavefront curvature. Mass is associated with retardation of energy flow and resultant time
dilation. Wave energy packets are separated by nodes which obstruct energy flow
restricting propagation. Mass corresponds to wave periodicity and is a measure of EM
wave volumetric nodal density. Rest mass is observed only in fundamental particles with
electric charge and is a ratio of charge to Compton angular frequency. Fundamental
particles are viewed as standing wave resonant structures and not point-like objects.
Travelling waves such as light and neutrinos acquire effective mass during propagation in
regions of higher EM density. Standing waves acquire mass and inertia as a result of
confinement of travelling waves as demonstrated in work by Jennison and Drinkwater. The
self-referral dynamics of radiation trapped in a phase-locked cavity accounts for Newton’s
First Law of Motion, i.e., every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in
motion unless an external force is applied to it. Hence, there is no need to attribute inertia
to instantaneous interaction with the rest of the matter in the universe according to the
Mach hypothesis. Mass and inertia are local phenomena. Mass may be understood as an
interaction of electromagnetic fields resulting in accelerative wavefront curvature without
recourse to the hypothetical, vaguely described Higgs field with unexplained mechanism
for imparting mass to massless particles. The confinement of light, consisting of massless
photons, in a fixed reference frame of a cavity resonator results in the creation of mass and
inertia. At a sufficiently high energy level corresponding to the rest mass of the electron,
the imbalance of electrostatic and magnetostatic fields results in topological confinement of
a photon within a fixed volume of Compton radius RC. Hence, fermions may be interpreted
as spinning, phase-locked, topologically confined, standing wave resonant structures with
electrons and positrons as the fundamental building blocks of matter.

x
 Preface
In general, the motion of a push-pull phase-locked cavity resonator consists of an
oscillatory sequenced series of accelerative jumps interspersed with coasting periods of
constant velocity. In this respect, a cavity resonator is somewhat analogous to an inflated
bouncing rubber ball alternately compressing and decompressing without internal
dissipative losses. The rhythmic pulsation of a phase-locked resonator in motion generates
longitudinal and transverse EM waves with frequency which varies with the cavity velocity.
For matter (composed of resonant EM standing waves) in motion, the Lorentz contraction is
interpreted as a physical wavelength compression due to variation in EM field energy
density as measured by vacuum refractive index KPV. A phase-locked resonator in motion
exhibits an oscillatory, pulsing compression and expansion emitting dipole radiation
transverse to the direction of motion. Interaction of these radiated waves with nearby
electrons via the electromagnetic vector potential Am results in coupling of N number of
electrons increasing their effective collective inertia as N2.
The Lorentz transformations of motion in terms of velocity ratios compared with Ivanov-
LaFreniere standing wave transformations in terms of standing wave ratios are shown to be
equivalent. Ivanov and LaFreniere have shown that standing waves undergo wavelength
(nodal) contraction in the direction of motion. An object in motion relative to a fixed
observer undergoes a Lorentz contraction (wavelength compression) in the direction of
motion and a Lorentz Doppler shift in frequency (reduction). The wavelength compression
is a physical result of an increase in the vacuum energy density. Moving clocks which are
made of standing matter waves undergo time dilation as a result. This is in keeping with de
Broglie and Schrödinger’s view that matter waves are real physical waves and not merely
particle location probability amplitudes described in the Born interpretation. The EM
wavelength contraction and frequency shift in a polarizable vacuum accounts for mass in
motion and gravitational effects, including the energy change, deflection of light,
gravitational frequency shift, and clock slowing. The speed of light c appears invariant in
all inertial frames due to Lorentz contraction of the measurement apparatus and a
concomitant Lorentz Doppler frequency shift. Spacetime remains Euclidean over scales
comparable to wavelength. The apparent Lorentz space contraction and time dilation are the
result of contraction of the nodal distance of the standing wave(s) which constitute the
length of measurement. Time dilation is equivalent to a change in the size of the units of
measurement which are undetectable to an observer as both the object and the comoving
measurement apparatus undergo Lorentz transformation.
Fundamental particles of matter exhibit properties of standing EM waves trapped in a
phase-locked resonator including Doppler frequency shifts in motion, inertia (resistance to
motion) and de Broglie waves. Matter in motion relative to an observer exhibits de Broglie
‘matter’ waves as a modulated moving standing wave. The inverse effect of self-induced
motion of matter may potentially be realized utilizing synthesized red- and blue-shifted
Lorentz Doppler waves parametrically amplified in a phase conjugate phase-locked
resonator. Energy of motion results from conversion of energy of the pump waves to the
contracted moving standing wave formed from the signal wave and its counterpropagating
phase conjugate wave within the resonator. Velocity of the resonator wave system is
proportional to the wave phase difference while acceleration is proportional to the
frequency difference. Synthesized matter waves would provide means for inertia
modification and control as well as self-induced motion of matter. Such technology would
enable EM wave-based propulsion without wheels, friction, reaction or expulsion mass.
Inverse effects are not without precedent as, for example, inverse Doppler effect, inverse
Sagnac effect, inverse Faraday effect, inverse Compton effect, inverse spin Hall effect,
inverse Cherenkov effect, inverse Raman effect, inverse Cotton-Mouton effect, inverse
Barnett effect (Einstein de Haas effect) and inverse piezoelectric effect, etc.

xi
Preface
Electric charge. Traditionally, electric charge has been opaquely described as a separate
dimension without geometrical description or explanation of its origin. In this book, a
description of electric charge is detailed relating it to dimensions of mass, rotation rate and
time which is interpreted as a rate of precession of closed loop standing waves and
described by the fine structure constant. Spin momenta is associated with loop closure
failure defects or dislocations in spacetime and resultant torsion stresses. The electron is
described as a helical toroid standing wave formed from an energetic photon travelling
wave with a full twist looped into a circle of a radius equal to the Compton wavelength. The
photon helicoid may be envisioned as a twisted ribbon spinning around its longitudinal axis.
The electron toroid geometry may be described in a twisted ribbon analogy as a spinning
closed-loop Hopf strip – the simplest form of topological knot. The torus geometry is
formed by a rotating charge path in the shape of a Hopf link with toroidal and poloidal
components. The ½-spin characteristic of the electron arises as a result of a toroidal spin
component of Compton frequency wC and a poloidal spin component of Zitterbewegung
frequency equal to 2wC. The imbalance of the electrostatic and magnetostatic energy gives
rise to the fine structure constant a. The charge-to-mass e/m ratio corresponds to a
precession frequency equal to we/m. The whirl number is found equal to the inverse fine
structure constant a-1. Electric charge has mechanical dimensions of MLT-1 and represents
an angular precession of ~1/137 (≃ 0.007) radians/sec. Spin angular precession creates
wave function interference obstructing energy flow resulting in electron mass. Charge
represents an angular torsion deficit angle and is correlated with a mass deficit angle.

Gravity. All matter is composed of quantum oscillators emitting electromagnetic waves

over the entire EM frequency spectrum. Gravity is viewed as a standing wave interaction
between coupled oscillators interacting via EM traveling waves (e.g., bosons). Inertia and
mass are the result of standing electromagnetic waves generated by an isolated oscillator
within a phase-locked resonator (e.g., fermions). Electromagnetic resonant wave
interactions in a polarizable vacuum (PV) model in Euclidean space exhibit geometrical
spacetime curvature consonant with Einstein SR/GR. Acceleration of gravity is the result
of a spectral energy density gradient and corresponds to the rate of change of rapidity.
Inertial mass of matter in motion and gravitational mass of matter in a gravitational field are
equivalent as both arise from acceleration into regions of increased EM flux energy density
and nonlinear frequency dependent alterations in vacuum dielectric constant.
Gravitation in the Einstein General Theory of Relativity (GR) is ascribed to a curvature
of space and time in an abstract mathematical representation. However, the GR theory
metaphysical description of gravitation does not describe the physical mechanism for how
matter induces curvature or how spacetime curvature influences motion of matter. It is
argued that space and time are not physical objects but are merely the mathematical
ordering of location of points in space and events in time. Time represents the flow of
energy. In an optical theory of gravity, the deflection of light in a gravitational field is the
result of variation in the vacuum refractive index KPV which is a measure of the
electromagnetic field energy density. Gravitation is equivalent to a dielectric gradient force
in a polarizable vacuum as a result of local Fresnel zone variation in electromagnetic (EM)
flux density and vacuum refractive index KPV. The gravitational force Fg is proportional to
the gradient of KPV2 (Fg ∝ m“KPV2). Interference of electromagnetic waves from coupled
oscillators produce Moiré patterns and Fresnel zones. EM wave front interference creates
a Fresnel zone effect between coupled mass source oscillators concentrating the local flux
density and increasing the electric permittivity gradient. Gravitons are illustrated as wave
interference of counterpropagating phase conjugate photons reflected from Fresnel zone
boundaries. Wavefront curvature provides an accelerative force indistinguishable from

xii
 Preface
gravity. The observed contraction of wavelength nodal distances is responsible for the
perceived Lorentz spatial contraction and time dilation effects. The metric of curved
spacetime corresponds to the wave front interference node metric. Hence, the gravitational
field becomes quantized and spacetime remains Euclidean. The quantized gravitation field
may be understood as purely an electromagnetic phenomena. As such, gravitational fields
may be subject to modification by alteration of the local electromagnetic field density to
check the propensity to fall or neutralize weight. Ability to effect at will modification of
the gravitational spectral energy density gradient and concomitant neutralization of the
local gravitational frequency shift differential will mark a significant technological
achievement and prove a benchmark of human intellect.
A conundrum of modern physics is the apparent incompatibility between quantum
mechanics and general relativity, each of which have had considerable success in
describing aspects of the physical universe. It is asserted that the mathematical construct of
spacetime curvature as represented in Einstein’s GR applies not to spacetime itself but
rather to wavefront curvature and nodal contraction of electromagnetic waves in spacetime.
Based on investigations by Michael Faraday, the existence of electromagnetic waves
theorized by James Clerk Maxwell was experimentally demonstrated by Heinrich Hertz,
Nikola Tesla and others. The exact nature of just what is doing the ‘waving’ in
electromagnetic waves has remained a mystery. What constitutes Faraday’s invisible
electric and magnetic field lines of force? What Planck scale vacuum elements are in
contact to enable transmission of force? What accounts for the apparent tension and
pressure? The vacuum is calculated to have enormous energy density and is characterized
by quantum oscillators with zero point energy. What is the nature of such oscillators that
support propagation of electromagnetic and gravitational wave disturbances? In this book,
Quantum Wave Mechanics, electromagnetic fields and waves are conjectured to be
disturbances in the physical vacuum composed of rotating quantized Planck dipoles
consisting of coupled positive and negative Planck mass with net zero mass and angular
momenta. Electric and magnetic field lines are manifestations of temporal and spatial spin
alignments of groupings of adjacent Planck dipoles. The Planck vacuum is represented as
an exceedingly dense energetic medium composed of Planck mass dipoles with
characteristic Planck impedance and under symmetry breaking, easily induced to spin.
Bosonic and fermionic fields correspond to resonant spin wave interactions between such
dipoles. Bosons represent traveling waves while fermions represent standing wave
structures both of which are electromagnetic. The spacetime metric is a mathematical
overlay description of electromagnetic interactions characterizing the relative positioning of
objects in space and ordering of events in time. The quantum vacuum may be understood
as a foam of postive and negative curvature and mass. Planck masses are the underlying
quintessence or “stuff” of the vacuum and are thought to arise spontaneously as a result of
vacuum instability from a state of nothingness. Dark energy represents quantum wave
function dissonance driving universe expansion.
Concept and inspiration is the aegis of design and invention. Knowledge and
understanding of quantum wave mechanics effects in the physical vacuum is a conditio sine
qua non for future theoretical development of funamental physics and may lead to new
technological developments such as wave-based propulsion, enhanced energy conversion,
vacuum engineering, programmable quantum dot nanostructures or artificial atoms and
force field effects. The relation and interconversion of fundamental and derived dimensions
of physical quantities and geometrical interpretations illustrated herein are intended to
relate previous discoveries and provide new sources of insight and ideas as to the nature of
physical reality and the universe in which we live.

xiii
Section 1 - Light

1. Photon Model

There is no greater mystery to me than that of light travelling through darkness. – Alexander
Volkov

I happen to have discovered a direct relation between magnetism and light, also electricity and
light, and the field it opens is so large and I think rich. – Michael Faraday

We can scarcely avoid the inference that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same
medium which is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena. – James Clerk Maxwell

For the rest of my life, I will reflect on what light is. – Albert Einstein

Light consists of photons, the quanta of electromagnetic fields. A freely-propagating

photon in empty space (gravity-free, zero curvature vacuum) is represented as a helical,
self-sustaining, traveling electromagnetic wavepacket of quantized spin angular momentum
moving at the velocity of light. An electromagnetic (EM) wavefront consists of a multitude
of in-phase photon torsional wave trains each of an ordered sequence of photon wave
packets. The photon is categorized as a stable, massless boson having no electrical charge
with spin angular momentum s = ±ħ. The photon is right-circularly polarized if sz = ħ and
left-circularly polarized if sz = -ħ. In the ansatz model described, the photon is posited to
consist of a spin density wave disturbance in a quantum vacuum composed of positive and
negative Planck mass dipoles. The spin field forms a kink or antikink soliton defined in
terms of the spin direction. Like a soliton, a photon may be regarded as a local confinement
of the energy of a wave field with particle-like behavior and may propagate without
dissipation or change of form. The spin axis s is aligned with the direction of propagation
vector k in either the forward or the backward direction depending on helicity. An
individual photon may be either right or left circularly polarized represented as polar
opposites on a Poincaré sphere. Linear polarization requires a superposition of an even
number of photons of opposite spin. In a coherent wave, wave packets overlap and are in
the same direction, in-phase and of the same frequency.
A conceptual helicoid model of the photon as a quantized wave packet of a single
wavelength is illustrated in Fig. 1-1. A helicoid describes a minimal surface generated by a
space curve which simultaneously rotates about an axis and translates parallel to that axis
such that the ratio of the rotational velocity to the translational velocity is constant. A
minimal surface has positive curvature in one principal direction and negative curvature in
the orthogonal direction with zero mean curvature. See Fig. 1-2. Photon models consisting
of transverse EM plane wavefronts composed of rotating orthogonal EHV dreibein (triad)
have been proposed by Hunter et al [1] and Funaro[2, 3, 4] and expressed in tetrad formalism
a
by Evans[5, 6]. The EM potential is defined by the dreibein Am where superscript a = 1, 2, 3
represents the tangent space and subscript m the base manifold. The internal index e in O(3)
electromagnetics, represents an orthonormal tangential space defined by unit vectors e1, e2,
e3 (complex circle basis) to the base manifold. The rotating EHV dreibein describes a
helical geodesic propagation path (circular helix, constant curvature, constant torsion)
which may be represented as a space curve in terms of the Frenet-Serret equations. A unit
speed curve corresponds to arc length s. Curvature (departure from linearity) corresponds
to the change in direction of the tangent vector t per unit arc length while the torsion
(departure from planarity) corresponds to the change in direction of the binormal vector b
(= t x n) which is orthonormal to the osculating plane defined by the curvature (radial)
vector n and tangential vector t. The charge path trajectory describes a geodesic on a
cylinder. Zero axial velocity (zero torsion) corresponds to a circle. Infinite velocity (infinite

1
1. Photon Model

torsion) corresponds to a line. In geometric terms, motion of an inextensible curve of

constant torsion (= 1/r) and constant curvature k = wu associated with the sine-Gordon
equation (wuv = 1/r2sinw) traces out a single-soliton Bianchi surface as it moves where at
each instant will be an asymptotic line on the surface. The sine-Gordon equation in this
representation includes one spatial and one temporal independent variable. The spatial
motion of curves of constant torsion and curvature such as the Sine-Gordon curve are
geometrically linked with soliton theory of nondispersive, solitary waves such as described
by the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) nonlinear wave equation.

Freely Propagating Far-Field Photon

Fig. 1-1. Illustration of a monochromatic single-wave length photon represented as a

torsional wave and a EM wavefront composed of photon wavetrains remote from source
quantum harmonic oscillator. Photons are elementary excitations of the normal modes of
the electromagnetic field with quantized energy ħwl and represent quantization of
Maxwell’s equations. Energy flow is in the direction of the Poynting vector S (= E x H).

2
 1. Photon Model

Fig. 1-2. Photon model detail illustrating electric and magnetic field component
relationship to helical curvature and torsion. The motion of the Frenet frame along the unit
speed curve is described by the Frenet-Serret formulas. The contravariant vector T is
tangent to the parametized curve. Right-hand (RH) circular polarization is shown.

Ordinary photons do have spin, they have a notion of helicity so they spin around their direction of
motion. – Roger Penrose

Electrons behave in exactly the same way as photons; they are both screwy. – Richard Feynman

3
1. Photon Model

A wave group consists of consecutive energy packets separated by nodes. Energy

trapped between consecutive nodes cannot escape, hence, wave energy travels at the group
velocity vg (= dx/dt = dw/dk) in the direction of propagation denoted by the wave vector k.
In a vacuum, the wave vector is given by k = w/c. In a material medium, the wave vector k
= wn/c = k0/◊(1 – b2) where n is the refractive index. An increase in the refractive index
lowers the phase velocity. The refractive index of a zero curvature vacuum equals one. For
a metamaterial with refractive index equal zero, the phase velocity and wavelength become
infinite. An increase in the energy density of the medium acts to slow the group velocity
compressing the wavetrain resulting in frequency up chirp. Conversely, a decrease in
energy density of the medium results in frequency down chirp. This effect is illustrated in
Fig. 1-3.

Wavetrain Compression

Fig. 1-3. Wave pulse compression results in high frequency chirp. Increase in frequency is
produced as a result of increase in refractive index n (= c0/c = c/vp) of the propagation
medium which is a measure of EM energy density. Up chirp corresponds to an increase in
frequency and torsion while down chirp corresponds to decrease in frequency and torsion.
A complex-valued EM wavefunction y (= E + iB) |→ eiqy can be represented as a complex-
valued wavelet time-frequency transform. Wavelet compression (i.e., change in scale factor
a) corresponds to a chirplet transform commonly used in signal processing.

I therefore take the liberty of proposing…the name photon. – Gilbert N. Lewis

4
 1. Photon Model

Near an oscillating dipole source in the near field evanescent region of the radiation
pattern, the electric E and magnetic H fields are out-of-phase and the Poynting vector S (=
E x H) has transverse components. This can result in unusual effects exploited in plasmonic
devices, metamaterial magnetic mirrors and the like. The field intensities in the near field
fall more steeply as 1/r3 than 1/r2 as in the far field region. Electromagnetic field
propagation from an oscillating dipole antenna illustrating amplitude and phase change in
electric E-field and magnetic H-field with distance from source generator is illustrated in
Fig. 1-4. Wave impedance is reactive close to the antenna with transverse and longitudinal
E-field components in the near-field. In the far-field, the transverse E-field and H-field are
perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation in phase quadrature with the wavefront
approximating a plane wave. The transition to a radiative field is marked by detachment of
flux lines from the antenna and self-closure.
Emission of energy from a harmonic oscillator occurs during the first quarter period of
oscillation and temporarily stored in the reactive field. Energy is radiated or reabsorbed by
the dipole antenna during the next quarter period. The magnetic field appears initially to
propagate at infinite velocity before slowing down to the speed of light within about a
quarter wavelength. The electromagnetic field energy E = ½[E2 – c2B2]. In the near field, a
dipole antenna field energy is primarily electric while a loop antenna field energy is largely
magnetic. The average energy velocity of propagation equals the speed of light. The free-
space impedance Z0 (radiation resistance) of the vacuum to EM wave propagation is
illustrated in Fig. 1-5 and depicts the mode transition from near- to far-field. Far-field
impedance Z0 = 120p W ≃ 376.7 W. The Planck impedance ZP is shown for comparison. In
circa 350 BC, Aristotle declared the famous dictum horror vacui (Nature abhors a vacuum)
based on the deduction that in a complete vacuum infinite speed would be possible because
motion would encounter no resistance. Hence, if infinite speed was impossible, so to is a
complete vacuum. The finite velocity of light in vacuo is a measure of impedance of wave
energy flow (c = 1/ZP4pe0). A complete vacuum devoid of a Planckian substructure as
hypothesized would not support propagation of a photonic spin wave disturbance.

Light itself is a revelation. – James Turrell

If I pursue a beam of light with velocity c, I should observe such a beam of light as an
electromagnetic field at rest though spatially oscillating. – Albert Einstein

Nothing is more practical than a good theory. – Ludwig Boltzmann

The ether undulates athwart the path of the wave’s advance. – Robert Gascoyne-Cecil

But without a medium how can the propagation of light be explained? – Albert Michelson

The vacuum was characterized by Dirac as a state with an infinite number of zero energy and zero
momentum quanta. Photon emission was considered as a transition from this vacuum state to a
state of a single photon with finite momentum and energy; photon absorption consisted of the
reversed transition. Schrödinger, on the other hand, in his formulation of quantum mechanics,
conceived the idea of a “wave function” y as representing some kind of wave, and he interpreted
the squared modulus |y|2 as the density of electronic matter. For him, following de Broglie, waves
were the fundamental entities. – Silvan S. Schweber

The same entity, light, was at once a wave and a particle. How could one possibly imagine its
proper size and shape? To produce interference it must be spread out, but to bounce off electrons
it must be minutely localized. This was a fundamental dilemma, and the stalemate in the wave-
photon battle meant that it must remain an enigma to trouble the soul of every true physicist. It was
intolerable that light should be two such contradictory things… – Banesh Hoffman

5
6
1. Photon Model

Fig. 1-4. Oscillating dipole electromagnetic wave propagation (½ wave dipole antenna at rest relative to an observer).
 1. Photon Model

Fig. 1-5. E and H field phase lag is illustrated as a function of distance from the emitter. The
phase difference falls to zero in the far field closed-loop region.

As shown in Fig. 1-6, the wave impedance (Z0 = |E|/|H|) of electric and magnetic fields
in the near field vary with frequency. The velocity of propagation becomes independent of
frequency for a wave frequency much greater than the cutoff frequency (n >> nc). In the
transverse electromagnetic mode (TEM), the free wavelength is much greater than the
cutoff wavelength (l >> lc) and, in a dispersionless medium, the phase velocity equals the
group velocity (vp = vg) for plane waves. In a waveguide at the cutoff frequency, the phase
velocity is infinite and the group velocity is zero. The cutoff wavelength of the vacuum is
taken as the Planck wavelength (lP = ◊c5/ħG/c3 = 1.616 x 10-35 m). For comparison, the
impedance of an orbital electron in the 1st orbital of a hydrogen atom is given as Z0/a =
51,649 W where a = the electron fine structure constant (a = Z0/Ze = ve/c) which reflects the
ratio of the tangential speed of the electron velocity to the velocity of light. The Planck
impedance is given by ZP = VP/IP = ħ/qP2 = 1/4pe0c and is a quantized expression of the
opposition to a change in flow of Planck charge qP (= e/◊a). The Z0/ZP ratio (= 4p) implies
a corresponding ratio of Planck mass tangential velocity to the velocity of light.

The speed of light is a constant of measure and not a constant of nature. – Konstantin Meyl

7
1. Photon Model

Wave Impedance vs. Wavelength

Fig. 1-6. Wave impedance (Z0) of electric and magnetic fields in near and far fields in
free-space. Wave propagation in waveguides is described by the Transverse Electric (TE),
Transverse Magnetic (TM) or Transverse Electromagnetic (TEM) modes as determined by
the longitudinal component. Antenna impedance at resonance equals radiation resistance.

Illustration of variation in wave vector (k) direction in relation to energy flow direction
represented by the Poynting vector (S) in different types of media is shown in Fig. 1-7. In
an ordinary wave, vectors k and S are aligned whereas in an extraordinary ray, the k and S
vectors are not aligned. The group velocity vg (the velocity of the wave group modulation
envelope) is in the direction of propagation. The phase velocity vp (the velocity of a point
on the smaller constituent waves, e.g., zero-crossing or wave crest) is in the direction of
momentum transfer. A travelling wave has a standing wave ratio SWR = 1 (no reflection)
while a standing wave has an SWR > 1. In a material medium, the phase velocity vp (=
1/◊e0m0) is a function of permittivity and permeability. Man-made metamaterials, such as
split-ring resonators (SSRs), complimentary split-ring resonators (SCRRs), exhibit
simultaneous negative permeability e and permeability m. Left-hand materials (LHMs) or
negative index materials (NIMs) exhibit negative index of refraction resulting in opposed
phase and group velocities. For LHMs, EM waves propagate towards the source, opposite
to the direction of energy flow. A similar reverse effect occurs as well for Cherenkov
radiation such as emitted when an electron passes through a dielectric medium of periodic
structure comparable to the wavelength at a speed in excess of the phase velocity of light.
Optical tractor beams make use of such effects to produce a negative radiation pressure
pulling an illuminated object towards the source. With a zero-index material (ZRM), the
phase velocity vp = ∞ and the group velocity vg = 0, such that no light propagates. A ZRM
may be constructed, for example, by stacked layers of metamaterial with alternating
positive and negative permittivity with effective zero permittivity resulting in phase
velocity and wavelengths approaching infinity.

8
 1. Photon Model

In a nondispersive medium, such as a vacuum below the Planck cutoff frequency wP, the
group velocity equals the phase velocity (vg = vp). Non-dispersive waves (e.g., light, sound,
shallow water tension waves, solitons) retain their envelope shape while their energy,
momentum, and phase speed remains constant (w = ck). In a dispersive medium, waves of
different wavelength travel with different speeds resulting in chromatic dispersion effects
such as prismatic rainbows. In a bulk medium, chromatic dispersion results from a
variation in refractive index with frequency. The phase velocity in a dispersive medium
varies with frequency. For a normal dispersive medium, higher frequency components
travel slower than low frequency components resulting in up-chirp. For a dispersive
medium, such as water, the group velocity is greater than the phase velocity (vg > vp).
Dispersive waves (e.g., deep water gravity waves, capillary waves) broaden as they
propagate. The group velocity of the wave is usually the observed velocity and is the
velocity at which energy is transmitted. Zero dispersion can occur when the material and
waveguide dispersion cancel, an effect significant in fiber optics. Pulse broadening may
also occur as a result of modal dispersion in waveguides.
For a light pulse propagating in an anomalous dispersive medium (ADM), higher
frequency wave components travel faster than slower components producing down-chirp.
The velocity of light is not necessarily semper et ubique a fixed upper limit. In a medium
with anomalous dispersion, under some circumstances, the group velocity of a narrow-band
pulse may exceed the velocity of light (vg > c). This apparent contradiction with relativity
theory is explained as causality is preserved as it is the signal front velocity vf that is limited
to the speed of light c and it is the signal wave front that conveys information, not
necessarily the wave peak. Anomalous dispersion occurs when the frequency of incident
light is approximately equal to the absorption resonance frequency of the medium. In a
non-linear optical medium, an AC Kerr effect can give rise a self-induced phase modulation
and frequency shift produced by change in the refractive medium by the electric field of the
light wave. For a narrow-band pulse in a anomalous dispersive medium, the pulse peak
becomes shifted towards the signal front as the pulse propagates. As a result, the peak of
the pulse envelope described by the group velocity becomes larger than front velocity (vg >
vf) which propagates at c. Under resonance conditions, the group velocity vg may be
positive or negative, subluminal or superluminal. Pulse propagation in non-dispersive,
dispersive and anomalous dispersive medium are compared in Fig. 1-8.
Polarization of light, by convention, refers to the direction of the transverse vibration
plane of the electric field. For unpolarized light, there is no preferred transverse direction.
Polarized light may be linear, elliptical or circularly polarized depending on the rotation and
amplitude of the electric field vector. A superposition of left- and right- hand circularly
polarized photons can give rise to a light wave with linear polarization such that there is no
net angular rotation. A circularly polarized beam exhibits a constant angular rotation as
viewed along the axis of propagation with constant amplitude. A circularized polarized
beam may be realized by out-of-phase superposition of two circularly polarized waves. If
the amplitude varies with rotation, the beam is elliptically polarized. Polarization states of
an electromagnetic wave may be described by a two-dimension complex (Jones) vector or
represented on a Poincaré sphere such as shown in Fig. 1-9. For fully polarized light, the
polarization state point lies on the surface; partially polarized states lie within the sphere.

All the fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no closer to the question, “What are
light quanta?” Of course today every rascal thinks he knows the answer, but he is deluding
himself. – Albert Einstein

9
1. Photon Model

Wave propagation

Fig. 1-7. Wave vector k defining the direction of planes of constant phase is, in general,
not in the same direction as the energy flow vector S direction and depends on the type of
media. Plane waves in isotropic media which are in-phase have wavefronts perpendicular
to the direction of propagation. In anisotropic media, plane waves which are phase shifted
have wavefronts that are inclined to the direction of propagation. Unlike right-hand
metamaterials, left-hand metamaterials exhibit wave vectors opposite to the direction of
energy flow. Chiral metamaterials allow for torsional deformation. A plane wave of definite
wave vector k and polarization s has no localization in space or time and, hence, may be
regarded as a one-photon state distributed over spacetime. A photon may be approximately
localized in the form of a wave packet centered at a given location at a given time. A
quantum mechanical n-photon Fock state |n corresponds to a discrete number of field
excitations |k1s1, k2s2…knsn where ki is the wave vector and si the polarization for a given
mode generated by repeated action of creation operators â↑ on the ground state |y0.

I insist upon the view that ‘all is waves’ – Erwin Schrödinger

The Schrödinger equation came as a great relief, now we no longer had to learn the strange
mathematics of matrices. – George Uhlenbeck

If I were there I would, as in the case of the Zeeman effect, plead for a formal dualistic theory;
everything must be describable both in terms of the wave theory and in terms of light quanta. –
Werner Heisenberg

There are only three basic actions needed to produce all of the phenomena associated with light
and electricity. – R. P. Feynmann

10
Section 2 - Electricity

17. Electron Model

The electron can no longer be conceived as a single, small granule of electricity; it must be
associated with a wave, and this wave is no myth; its wavelength can be measured and its
interferences predicted. – Louis de Broglie

There was a time when we wanted to be told what an electron is. The question was never
answered. No familiar conceptions can be woven around the electron; it belongs to the waiting
list. – Arthur Eddington
We can therefore say that we have now reached a theoretical understanding of the existence of
the electron, but in no way that of its constitution. – Pascual Jordan

The magnetic cleavage of the spectral lines is dependent on the size of the charge of the electron,
or, more accurately, on the ratio between the mass and charge of the electron. – Pieter Zeeman

The bridge between the electron and other elementary particles is provided by the fine structure
constant, a ~1/137, as manifested in the factor-of-137 spacings between the classical electron
radius, electron Compton radius, and the Bohr radius… – Malcolm H. MacGregor

A number of torus ring electron models have been previously proposed including those
by Compton[44], Allen[45], Thomas[46], Jennison[47], Bergman/Wesley[48,49], Hestenes[50],
Williamson / van der Mark[51], Kanarev[52,53], Winterberg[7], Ginzburg[54], Carroll[55],
Heaston[56], Lucas[57], Rivas[58], Gauthier[59], Klyushin[60] and others in addition to a variety
of disc and spherical wave models by Crane, Macken, Wolf, Haselhurst, Tomes, Cabala,
LaFreniere, MacGregor, Tewari, Ghosh, etc. In superstring theory, the electron is
represented as a closed loop with size on the order of the Planck scale with no explanation
of electric charge. What discriminators may be applied to determine which of the proposed
models best represents the observed reality? The ability to account for pair production and
annihilation presents a critical test. It is experimentally observed that energetic photon(s)
and electrons/positrons may be interconverted in pair production/annihilation processes.
The geometrical transformation of an energetic photon into an electron/positron pair must
be mathematically demonstrable. Likewise, the emission of a pair of photons with opposite
momenta resulting from the annihilation of an electron and positron must be shown to be
geometrically possible for a plausible model. The creation of electric charge and rest mass
during electron/positron formation must be explained and calculable. The observed physical
properties of the photon, electron and positron must be accounted for and quantified.
A photon wave-train is described as a helicoid in a twisted ribbon travelling wave
geometrical model. A closed-loop double loop Hopf strip may be formed from a ribbon
with a full twist. An eccentric hula-hoop motion of a Hopf strip generates a swept volume
toroidal envelope corresponding to a closed-loop sanding wave. See Fig. 17-1. An
example of a torus ring model is depicted in Fig. 17-2 illustrating an electron consisting of
two orthogonal spinors generated by a rotating Hopf link corresponding to a poloidal and
toroidal current loop. The charge trajectory is described by a precessing Hopf link, the
simplest form of knot, embedded in a torus manifold created by eccentric motion.

It has to do with electrons. You know, the little things that whirl in space.
Never heard of them. – Dr. Stanton (Riders to the Stars)

You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron. – Albert Einstein

148
 17. Electron Model

Electron-positron pair production requires electric fields greater than the Schwinger field
critical value Ecr = m2c3/eħ @ 1.3 x 1018 V/m sufficient to provide the required rest mass
energy. Pair production occurs by decay of a sufficiently energetic photon near an atomic
nucleus g → e- + e+ or through photon-photon interaction via Breit-Wheeler decay gg →
e+e- such as a probe photon propagating through a polarized short-pulsed electromagnetic
field. Photons (gamma rays) may be generated in a reverse annihilation process by
collision of an electron and positron e+e- → gg. An inelastic collision of a photon with a
free electron results in Compton scattering with a result momentum transfer altering the
photon wavelength. Acceleration or deceleration of an electron results in photon emission
such as EM radio wave emission at low energy or Bremsstrahlung emission, synchrotron
radiation, or Cherenkov radiation at high energy with photon energy proportional to
frequency.
The classical electron radius re also known as the Thompson scattering length is derived
by assuming the electron is a sphere with uniform charge density and equating the potential
energy of charged sphere Ep = c2/pc0r2 with the electron’s rest mass energy E = m0c2 and
solving for radius r. The resultant value of this estimate is 2.8179 x 10-15m. For
comparison, the calculated Compton wavelength lC of 2.4263 x 10-12m as determined from
scattering experiments yields a reduced Compton radius RC (= lC/2p) of 3.8616 x 10-13m.
Remarkably, an electron, a spin ½ħ fermion with quantized electric charge (e-) and
positive rest mass (me = 0.511 MeV/c2), may be created from an energetic photon, a spin ±1
ħ boson with no electric charge or rest mass. A toroid configuration of the electron has long
been posited to account for the observed physical properties such as quantized electric
charge, magnetic moment, g-factor, spin angular momentum, etc. The electron’s
wavefunction y may be represented as consisting of two spinor components one with right-
hand and one with left-hand helicity. An example of a model electron formed from a single
wavelength helical photon topologically confined into a torus configuration is shown in
Figs. 17-3 through 17-9. In this model, the helical path of a photon is in the form of Hopf
link which under rotation traces out a trajectory path of toroidal geometry. The electron has
a magnetic dipole moment ms as a result of its intrinsic spin angular momentum S (= ħ[½(½
+ 1)]½). In the ansatz model considered here, the electron has both a toroidal spin and
poloidal spin component. If there were no spin-spin interaction of the toroidal spin angular
momenta So and the poloidal spin angular momentum Sr, the orientation of one vector
would be independent of the other.
The electron in the toroid model illustrated has both toroidal rotation and poloidal
rotation such that the EHV triplet charge path develops two internal rotations for each
toroidal rotation. The toroidal radius corresponds to the reduced Compton radius (RC =
lC/2p). The tangential velocity of rotation vt equals the velocity of light c (vt = RCwC). Due
to the increased magnetic field, the orbital charge velocity internally varies from
superluminal at the orbital periphery to sublight velocity at the spin center. The ½ħ spin
characteristic of the electron arises from the ratio of the Compton and Zitterbewegung
rotational frequencies (wC /wzbw = ½) resulting in the observed net spin in a reference frame
at rest with the observer.

The fundamental fact of electron theory, the existence of discrete electrical particles, thus
manifests itself as a characteristic quantum phenomena, namely as equivalent to the fact matter
waves only appear in discrete quantized states. – Pasqual Jordan

Nobody has ever seen an electron. Nor a thought. – Robert A. Heinlein

Zitterbewegung: what happens when you take too much coffee. – Prof. Rabindra Mohapatra

149
17. Electron Model

Transformation of a travelling wave (helicoid) into a

closed-loop standing wave (toroid)

Fig. 17-1. Illustration of a rotating closed-loop Hopf link formed from a twisted ribbon
(helicoid) embedded in a torus of revolution. Such a geometry exhibits a ½ spin
characteristic, i.e., a 720o rotation is required to return to the starting position. Similarly, a
spin 1 photon (a travelling wave of helical geometry) may be transformed into a spin ½
electron (a closed-loop standing wave of toroidal geometry). Electric charge (spin
precession) corresponds to a torsion field dislocation defect (loop closure failure).

The only thing you can say about the reality of the electron is to cite its mathematical properties.
– Martin Gardner

As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are
certain they do not refer to reality. – Albert Einstein

150
 17. Electron Model

Toroidal electron model

Parameter Symbol Relation Value Units

Electric charge e = F/E = Fk/Ek = ħk/A = 1.60217E-19 Coul
= E/V = p/k·A = ◊(aqP2)
= m(wC + wp) ≃ mwC 7.019E-10 kg·rad/s
Mass me 2
= E/c = ħ/c·RC = |V·q|/c 2
9.10938E-31 kg
= ħk/v = e/(wC+wp) ≃ e/wC
Compton wavelength lC = h/mc = h/p 2.4263E-12 m
2
Compton frequency fC = mc /h = c/lC = wC /2p 1.2355E20 Hz
Compton radius: RC = lC/2p = aa0 = ◊(E/mw2) 3.8616E-13 m
Compton angular wC = c/RC = mc /ħ ≃ e/m
2 7.7634E20 rad/s
frequency
Zitterbewegung wzbw = 2wC 1.5527E21 rad/s
angular frequency
Precession frequency wp = we/m = q/m = awC 1.7588E11 rad/s
Spin angular s = ½ħ = iw = ½meR w C
2
5.2725E-5 J·s
momentum
Bohr magneton m = eħ/2m 9.274E-24 J/T
B
2
Rest Energy E = ħc/RC = m0c = mf 8.187E-14 J

Fig. 17-2. Toroidal electron is formed by a topologically confined photon inside the
Compton radius as a result of imbalance of electrostatic and magnetostatic energy. The
charge path represents a spin wave phase alignment of entrained Planck dipoles, the rotation
of which generates a toroidal form. The propagation of the rotating spin wave describes a
current loop of radius equal to one half the Compton radius.

151
17. Electron Model

Electron model cross-section

Parameter Symbol Relation Value Units

Charge radius Re = ◊(2lC/4p) = Rzbw/sing 2.7305E-13 m

Classical electron R0 = (1/4pe0) e2/mec2 2.8179E-15 m

radius = ke(e2/mec2)
Compton radius RC = lC/2p = aa0 = h/2pmc 3.8616E-13 m
2
EM radius Rem = ħ/mc = Rm 1.2880E-21 m

Helix radius Rphoton = Rhelix = lC/2p 3.8616E-13 m

= ◊(E/me·w2)
Mass radius (max) Rm = ħc/E = ħ/mc 3.8613E-13 m
Poloidal radius Rp = Rm/2 1.9308E-13 m
Spindle (inversion) Rs = RC – Rm = aRm 2.6983E-17 m
radius
Toroidal radius Rt = RC(1 + a/2p) 3.8616E-13 m
Zitterbewegung Rzbw = Rm = lC/4p = ħ/2mc 1.9308E-13 m
radius = c/2wC = Resing

Fig. 17-3. Characteristic dimensions of electron torus model. The toroidal circumference
corresponds to the Compton wavelength lC of the confined photon. The electron Compton
radius is RC = lC/2p = (lC/a-1)/q137. Electron charge (a torsion defect due to loop closure
failure) is a result of a slight spin precession with whirl no. = a-1 where a = fine structure
constant. Electron mass results from wave function interference due to spin precession.

152
 17. Electron Model

Electron ring configuration

Fig. 17-4. Electron depicted as precessing epitrochoid charge path composed of two
orthogonal spinors describing a rotating Hopf link with toroidal and poloidal current loop
components of 2:1 rotary octave. Rotation of the charge path generates the torus geometry.
The spin ratio of the Compton angular frequency wC and the Zitterbewegung angular
frequency wzbw (= 2wC) corresponds to observed spin of ½. Precession induces an internal
magnetic field that is stronger by a factor of a-1 than the spin induced magnetic field
external to the Compton radius aligned along the spin direction.

How electrons are made has not yet been determined. – Oliver Heaviside

To the electron…May it never be of any use to anybody. – J. J. Thomson (Cavendish Lab toast)

I now believe in the idea of the self-rotating electron. – Wolfgang Pauli

How can one look happy when he is contemplating the anomalous Zeeman effect? – Wolfgang
Pauli

153
17. Electron Model

Electron spin precession

Fig. 17-5. In the electron model illustrated, electron spin precession we/m is due primarily to
imbalance of electrostatic and magnetostatic energy resulting in an eccentric whirl orbit of
the charge path about the spin axis. The precession follows a zoom-orbit whirl with a
periapsis advance q137 that is a function of the fine structure constant a and the Compton
radius RC. Synchronization occurs every a-1 revolutions. The Thomas precession frequency
wT is approximately equal in magnitude to Compton angular frequency wC. Electron rest
mass m0 equals E/c2 (= |V·q|/c2 ≃ ħ/a0ca = e/wC). Electric charge q = ħk/A = C·V = p/k·A
where k = wave no., A = vector potential, C = capacitance, V = voltage, p = momentum.

In quantum theory, mass corresponds to the periodicity of waves. – Arthur Eddington

The rigid electron is no working hypothesis, but a working hindrance. – Hermann Minkowski

154
 17. Electron Model

Electron toroidal electric field

Fig. 17-6. Electrostatic E-field of the electron shown time-averaged over one rotation
period. For a positron, the electric flux lines y are directed radially inward. At distances
greater than the Compton radius RC, the electric flux distribution is spherically symmetric
equivalent to a point charge for an electron in an inertial reference frame. The instantaneous
electric field E vector is represented as a Hopf strip embedded in a torus. The toroidal
surface is generated by rotation of the Hopf link formed of poloidal and toroidal currents.
For a physical vacuum composed of Planck dipoles, the electric flux lines of the E-field
represent momentary synchronous alignment of positive MP+ and negative MP- Planck
masses.

Charge is certainly a well-characterized attribute, but the question: “What is charge?” is

presently unanswerable. – Riccardo C. Storti

A full theory of the dynamics of the electron depends upon assumptions concerning its structure,
an unsolved problem. – William Berkson

I believe that the development of the theory along the correct lines will then lead to a numerical
value of the fine-structure constant a = e2/ħc = 1/137, and to an explanation of the fact that
arbitrarily high masses do not appear concentrated in a given region of space region in nature. –
Wolfgang Pauli

155
17. Electron Model

Electron as a rotating spin wave

Fig. 17-7. The electron continuously generates a dipolar spin wave at the Compton
frequency fC (= mc2/h = 1.236E20 Hz). The electron acts as a spinning dipole antenna with
virtual radiation emission of a pair of entangled wavefronts along the spin axis. Viewed
along the spin axis, the dipole waves describe an Archimedean spiral. Virtual photons are
continuously emitted and absorbed and, like unobservable Cheshire cats, appear to wink in
and out of existence – but have a measurable zero point energy effect en masse.

156
 17. Electron Model

Electric field of an oscillating electron

Fig. 17-8. Oscillation of the electron at frequencies less than the Compton frequency fC in
response to an external electromagnetic field results in generation of observed EM waves in
synchronicity with the imposed frequency. In a) is depicted vertical sinusoidal oscillation.
Horizontal acceleration over an interval Dt is illustrated In b) showing a propagating
spherical disturbance with farfield flux pointing in the direction of the retarded initial
starting position. Entangled states represent different points on the same wavefront and,
hence, share properties of energy, momentum and polarization. Measurements of particle
states are thus correlated as they are sampling the same wavefront. Hence, no superluminal
influence or “spooky action at a distance” is involved in perceived entanglement. An
‘observer’ is simply an interacting object being acted upon – No consciousness is required.

All matter is simply undulations in the fabric of space. – William Clifford

All forces are consequences of geometry. – Timothy Ferris

157
17. Electron Model

Electron toroidal magnetic field

Fig. 17-9. Magnetostatic B-field of the electron is shown time-averaged over one rotation
period. The external magnetic field flux configuration is toroidal while the internal
magnetic field is poloidal. Magnetic flux is concentrated in a pinch zone in the central
region creating a concentration of potential magnetic energy density. The magnetic flux
lines represent filaments of vortical rotation of Planck dipoles of the physical vacuum. The
external magnetic field corresponds to the interference pattern of the current loop magnetic
flux. Spin precession results in wave field interference and generation of mass.

The electron, in a sense, may be considered as a form of a primitive electrical machine

consisting of an electric circuit linked with a magnetic circuit similar to a transformer or
electric motor. See Fig. 17-10. The electromotive force (e.m.f.) in an electric circuit equals
current x resistance. The magnetomotive force (m.m.f.) in a magnetic circuit equals flux x
reluctance which is proportional to the product of current and number of turns or ampere-
turns. Electrical power produced in the electric current loop is the product of electromotive
force (E = e.m.f.) and current (I). In an electron, the estimated electrical power (P = V·I) is
≅ 5.1096 x105 watts. As shown by Macken[20], the circulating electrical power (Pc = EiwC =
wC2·ħ) in an electron is ≅ 6.355 x 107 watts. Maximum current induced by the magnetic
flux for a given e.m.f. occurs when electric circuit resistance (R) and magnetic circuit
reluctance (R) are both minimized. Maximum magnetic flux (fB) is realized for a given
current (I) with minimal reluctance. The electric current I (= dQ/dt) or equivalently, the
magnetic vector potential A, represents mass motion of Planck dipoles in a spin density
wave. Electric charge e [Q] is dimensional equivalent to mass•radians/unit time [MFT-1].

158
 17. Electron Model

Hopf link

Fig. 17-10. An electron represented schematically as a primitive electrical machine

linking a super-conducting electric circuit with a magnetic circuit resembles a
transformer. Two interconnected loops (fiber bundles) form a Hopf link. The magnetic
flux density B (= -∇fB = ∇·A), the gradient of the magnetic scalar potential fB (= LI =
∫Vdt = ∮A·dl), represents vortical motion of spin chains of Planck dipoles with dimension
of inverse radians [F-1]. Broken magnetic flux lines reconnect to form closed loops.

A single electron represents a vast store of internal energy with a rest energy of 0.511
MeV/c2, an electric current of 19.7 Amperes and an electric power estimated at 5.109E05
Watts. The electron shrinks in size with increasing kinetic energy and, thus, appears as a
point object when probed at high energy. The change in poloidal diameter is a measure of
the individual temperature of an electron[61]. With spin-oriented electrons trapped in
metamaterial quantum wells, might it be possible to synthesize an electron-like artificial
spin wave with an excess of magnetostatic energy over electrostatic energy that precesses to
generate electric charge? For example, if a surfeit of electrons is confined in a superlattice
of oriented, layered graphene sheets and subjected to rotation, an expanding and contracting
Moiré pattern results changing the energy density in a periodic fashion. The diffraction
patterns form an adjustable fractal antenna allowing coupling to external photonic fields.
Connected to an external resonant LC circuit, the electron oscillations may be converted to
EM waves or conversely, as in a dielectric, electrons may be excited in resonance with
incident EM waves. To reproduce Maxwell’s results of electrical disturbances in dielectrics
producing transverse waves, Helmholtz deduced that the vacuum must be polarizable
electrically and magnetically. If there were any resistance to vacuum polarization,
longitudinal waves would result in addition to transverse waves. In a material dielectric,
the movement of electrons result in self-induction interaction and magnetic interference
thus decreasing the local velocity of light and increasing the index of refraction.

159
17. Electron Model

The size and energy content of the electron varies with motion as a function of the
Lorentz factor g. As illustrated in Fig. 17-11, the electron represented as a standing wave
resonator undergoes a Lorentz contraction in the direction of motion. An electron shrinks in
size as energy of motion increases as a function of the Lorentz factor g (= 1/◊(1 - (v/c)2)).
The electric permittivity e (= e0/◊g00) and magnetic permeability m (= m0/◊g00) vary with
the GR metric coefficient g00. In a gravitational field, an equivalent relation holds as the
gravitational gamma G = dt/dt = 1/◊(1 – (2GM/c2R)) = 1/◊g00 = 1/◊(1 - (ve/c)2) where t
= coordinate time (stationary metric), t = proper time, R = radial distance and ve is the
escape velocity of the central mass M. The EM energy density in a polarizable vacuum
may be represented by a scalar vacuum index of refraction index KPV (= G2 = 1/g00).
The mechanism for storage of energy and re-radiation by an electron under acceleration
is elucidated in a theory of forces developed by Bergman[48]. To briefly summarize, the
electric field amplitude during acceleration undergoes relativistic contraction and the
electron decreases in size (radius R = R0/g) as energy acquired increases (E = gE0).
Magnetic induction (E = -f/dt) stores energy in the surrounding electromagnetic radiation
field. See Fig. 17-12. The radiation field corresponds to the induced EM field asymmetry
under acceleration. A measure of the local field distortion is represented by the non-
orthogonality of the E and H vectors. The magnetic energy Em, electrostatic energy Es,
inductance L and magnetic flux fm increase by the Lorentz g factor. The increase in
magnetic energy density is equivalent to an increase in magnetostatic pressure acting to
reduce the size of the electron. The change in electron radius, mass, flux, inductance,
capacitance and energy as a function of velocity ratio b and Lorentz factor g is shown in
Figs. 17-13 through 17-18. The Schwinger correction[61] for spinning mass is given by ms =
m(1 - a/2p) in which the electromagnetic mass Dm = m·a/2p where a is the fine structure
constant. In the toroid electron model illustrated, the additional mass due to the magnetic
field (Dm = mea/2p) results in a reduced Compton radius (RC’ = aRC = aħ/mc). The
magnetostatic energy Em0 is reduced Em0’ = Emo(1 - a/2p) while the electrostatic energy is
increased Es0’ = Es0(1 + a/2p). Langragian energy L = Es0(1 + a/2p) - Em0(1 - a/2p).
The combined matter wave of a coupled pair of electrons (superconducting Cooper pairs)
corresponds to a partially overlapping superposition of wave functions with length and peak
amplitude greater that that of a single electron in isolation. This effect enables tunneling of
pairs of electrons through an insulating barrier of a few nanometers thick between two
superconducting wires that would otherwise impede current flow of single electrons. This
effect is utilized in a Josephson junction superconducting tunneling current switch. On-off
current flow is electromagnetically controlled via an external magnetic field in an adjacent
control wire enabling very fast switching speeds of up to ~10 terahz (THZ).

De Broglie’s ideas were for a free electron by itself, and Schrödinger extended them to apply to
an electron moving in an electromagnetic field. – P.A.M. Dirac

Einstein suggested that mass might be an interrelation between electromagnetic and gravitational
fields. – A.R. Weyl

No, It’s quite impossible for the electron to have spin. – Hendrik Lorentz

I would rather know what an electron is. – Albert Einstein

Light travels with the velocity of light. That’s a nice sentence. – Prof. Rabindra Mohapatra

Time reversal goes with inversion of energy and mass. Consequently, there are two kinds of
antimatter of opposite mass. – Jean-Pierre Petit

160
Section 3 - Gravity

33. Gravitation
Sir Isaac Newton when asked how he discovered the law of gravity is said to have replied ”By
thinking about it all the time.” – Isaac Newton

I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous
structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory
included, [and of] the rest of modern physics. – Albert Einstein

If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; there is where they should be.
Now build your foundations under them. – Henry D. Thoreau

33.1 Gravity of the matter

Gravitation in a quantum gravity theory is a result of resonant electromagnetic (EM)

wave interactions in a polarizable vacuum (PV) with a variable refractive index. Unlike the
geometric spacetime curvature assumed in the Einstein Theory of General Relativity (GR),
gravitation in the Puthoff et al PV model[29,30] is described instead by variation in EM wave
energy and density due to local variation in the vacuum refractive index KPV. The PV
theory was proposed by H. Wilson[27] in 1921 and later developed by R.H. Dicke[28] in 1957,
Puthoff[30] and Krogh[32]. The refractive index n is a ratio of the phase velocity v in a
medium to velocity of light c in a gravity-free, zero curvature vacuum (n = c/v). Variable
vacuum electric permittivity and magnetic permeability results in a variation in the speed of
light providing an explanation of bending of light and gravitational attraction in terms of
local scalar e and m fields. Einstein, in 1911, initially proposed a gravitation theory with a
variable speed of light as a function of potential, but later in 1916, settled for a purely
mathematical GR metric description[35] in which particles move along geodesics without a
defined causal physical mechanism for means by which mass-energy curves spacetime.
This metaphysical theory, further refined in 1918, uses a metric tensor field to describe both
spacetime geometry and gravitation without a physical explanation. In lieu of an
unexplained mechanism for assumed “bending” of spacetime (e.g., alteration in space
(contraction) and time (dilation) in accelerated inertial frames), the Lorentz contraction in
the Ivanov-LaFreniere wave model[36,37,38] refers instead to a physical EM wavelength
contraction (compression of the nodal distance) and frequency reduction of a standing
matter waves in motion. 4D spacetime remains invariant. A variation in the vacuum
dielectric constant KPV provides the mechanism for alteration in wavelength which occurs
in quantized multiples of wavelength. The EM wavelength contraction and frequency shift
in a polarizable vacuum accounts for mass in motion and gravitational effects including the
energy change, deflection of light, gravitational frequency shift and clock slowing.
The gravitational attraction between masses modeled as EM oscillators, as shown by
Ivanov, is the result of an arrhythmia (frequency pulling effect) due to a difference in
frequencies. Mass represents a resistance to frequency change. An energy flow occurs
from the oscillator with higher frequency to the lower frequency oscillator as a clock
synchronization effect between coupled oscillators. The energy flow between masses is
transmitted via electromagnetic waves in a standing wave interaction (mode-locking)
between coupled oscillators. The acceleration of gravity is developed within each mass in
response to the frequency differential to reduce the overall energy level. The energy flow is
modulated by a Fresnel zone effect increasing the local EM flux density between coupled
masses. The increased EM flux density (D, B) increases the local KPV (r,w,M) dielectric
constant and gradient with a resultant increase in an associated gradient force of attraction

328
 33. Gravitation

(Fg ∝∇KPV2) proportional to the gradient of KPV2 and, hence, is always attractive. The
family of ellipsoidal Fresnel zones encapsulate the coupled masses forming in effect a
graded dielectric lens with the center of masses at the ellipse focii. Photons emitted from
each oscillator mass are reflected at the Fresnel zones boundaries towards the opposite foci.
The augmented gradient produces a force of attraction substantially greater than the
radiation pressure imbalance from a long range Casimir force. The variation in EM flux
energy density produces a nonlinear variation in e0 and m0 of the interacting mass altering
the local speed of light. The alteration of e0 and m0 results in local variation of the EM
energy density as measured by the vacuum refractive index KPV and provides a mechanism
for EM wave contraction effects.
A comparison of physical constants and units of measure in a spacetime GR model in
terms of the gravitational G with physical parameters as a function of the vacuum dielectric
constant KPV may be shown illustrating an exact one-for-one correspondence as does the
g factor in SR. The equivalence between gravitational mass and inertial mass has a
common origin – acceleration into a region of increased EM energy density i.e., increased
dielectric constant KPV.
According to the Ivanov ‘Rhythmodynamics’ model of gravitation[37,38], matter consists
of packages of standing waves of collectively synchronized elements linked by wave fields
– in effect, an assembly of standing wave resonators formed of fermions. An
electron/positron as a fermion constitutes an elementary standing wave resonator. In the
presence of a gravitational field, the mass oscillators undergo a phase shift. Displacement
of potential holes (standing wave minima) is triggered by a phase shift. Wave system
velocity vg is proportional to phase difference (vg = Df·c/p = b·c). Accumulation of phase
displacement between moving elements makes the system self-accelerate. Gravitational
acceleration g is proportional to the net frequency difference (= 2c·Dn·ru) which is a
function of the gradient in EM energy density (= ∇n) and, hence, may be subject to control
as discussed in subsequent sections.
The fall of an object under a gravitational field involves a conversion of potential energy
into kinetic energy according to conservation of energy. The kinetic energy resides with
the falling object. Where is the potential energy stored? In the physical aether model, the
potential energy represents kinetic energy of Planck scale dipoles composed of positive and
negative Planck masses which make up the vacuum and matter fields. Jefimenko[16] notes
that the process by which this interchange takes place may be explained as a consequence
of influx of gravitational-cogravitational field energy via a gravitational Poynting vector.
The self-induced gravito-magnetic field Bg of a falling object induces a circumferential
field surrounding the object due to a mass current similar to a magnetic field B induced by
an electrical current. The net gravitational acceleration acting on a falling object is the sum
of the Earth’s external field g, the gravitational self-generated gravitational field gc and the
self-induced motional gravito-magnetic field Bg. The gravito-magnetic Poynting field Sg (=
Eg x Hg) is radially inward directed whereas the gravito-magnetic field Bg is a circular field
oriented perpendicular to the direction of motion in alignment with g and directed
according to the left-hand rule relative to the mass current direction.

The introduction of the “cosmological member” into the equations of gravity, though possible
from the point of view of relativity, is to be rejected from the point of view of logical economy. –
Albert Einstein

The key difference between GR and EGM is that EGM explicitly describes why spacetime
physically becomes refractive in the presence of matter; GR does not. – Ricardo C. Storti

329
33. Gravitation

33.2 Newton’s law of gravitation

Halley and Wren, in 1684, speculated that the force of gravity must be inversely related
to separation distance based on a study of planetary orbits as had Hooke, Bullialdus and
Newton previously. At Halley’s urging, Isaac Newton published the Philosophiæ Naturalis
Principia Mathematica in 1687 which included a derivation of force of attraction in
accordance with Galileo’s and Kepler’s laws of motion that diminished with the square of
distance. The Newtonian gravitational coupling force of attraction between two idealized
point masses in scalar notation is given by

Fg = GmM/r2 = mm/r2 (33-1)

where:
Fg Force of gravity
Value: Varies Units: N Dimensions: MLT-2
[= kg(m/sec2)]
G Universal gravitation constant (= G0/G3 = c2Runiv/Muniv = 1/4peg = c3/Zs)
Value: 6.67384 x 10-11 Units: N·m2/kg2 Dimensions: L3/MT-2
(measured) [= m3/kg·sec2]
m Orbital (passive) mass
Value: Varies Units: kg Dimensions: M
M Central (active) mass
Value: Varies Units: kg Dimensions: M
m Standard gravitational parameter = GM = f·r
Value: Varies Units: m3s-2 Dimensions: M3T-2
r Radius vector r(t) = instantaneous distance between mass centers
Value: Varies Units: m Dimensions: L

In vector notation, the above may be written as Fg = -(GmM/r2)ru where ru is the unit
vector. The Gravitational constant G in terms of Planck units becomes GP = 2pG = c3tP/mP
= c3/Zs = lP3/mPtP2 = 4.2005E-10 m3/s2·kg where Zs = spacetime impedance (= mP/tP = c3/G),
tP = Planck time, mP = Planck mass, lP = Planck length and c = velocity of light = lP/tP.

The variation of force with the inverse square of distance in Newton’s law of gravitation
is illustrated in Fig. 33-1 for a pair of spherical masses. Newton’s law of gravitation is
independent of time and describes instantaneous action at a distance without description of
causal mechanism. Newton observes in a letter to Bentley “Tis inconceivable that inanimate
brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate
upon & affect other matter without mutual contact….That gravity should be innate &
{essential} to matter so that one body may act on another at a distance through a vacuum
without the mediation of anything else by & through which their action or force {may} be
conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has
in philosophical matters any competent faculty can ever fall into it.” In an essay included
in the second edition to the Principia (1713), Newton famously remarks “Hypotheses non
fingo”. In modern translation, “I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these
properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not feign hypotheses”.

Nature uses as little as possible of anything. – Johannes Kepler

330
 33. Gravitation

The gravitational force F1 experienced by mass m1 equals the gravitational force F2

experienced by mass m2

F1 = |F2| = G(m1 x m2)/r2 (33-2)

The gravitational charge of active mass M acting on a passive mass m generates an

acceleration g = GM/r2. The force exerted on another mass m is equal to mass x
acceleration

F = mg = (m) x GM/r2 = GMm/r2 (33-3)

The gravitational parameter GM expresses the relationship of gravitational potential f(r)

and mass radius R: f = - GM/R and the acceleration due to gravity: g = GM/R2. The
mass of a central body M and the period P of an orbiting mass m with velocity V in a
circular orbit are related by the gravitational parameter: GM = 3pV/P2. In terms of escape
velocity Ve, GM = Ve2R/2. The GM parameter is also directly related to the Schwarzschild
radius rS of an event horizon: GM = c2rS/2.

Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation

Fig. 33-1. The Newtonian gravitational force equation describes a static field configuration
with instantaneous, inverse square, action-at-a-distance gravitational force between a pair
of spherical mass objects represented as idealized points. The gravitational force is always
attractive and varies as 1/r2. Velocity dependent effects are not included, hence, Newton’s
equation is not relativistic.

It is better to be approximately correct rather than very precisely wrong. – Ricardo C. Storti

331
33. Gravitation

33.3 Gravitational flux intensity

In the non-relativistic Newtonian theory of gravity, the magnitude of force depends only
on the separation distance, and not on the velocity or acceleration of the masses – gravity is
assumed to act instantaneously. The theory describes action at a distance without
explanation for the means of force transmission or causal mechanism. The given
expression for gravitational force is described in terms of the coordinates of an
unaccelerated inertial frame of reference. The inverse square law relation is scale invariant
and independent of time with an implicit assumption of absolute space and time with
instantaneous velocity of propagation. Gravitational waves are inconsistent with the
concept of instantaneous action. As such, the Newtonian relation represents a static, non-
relativistic approximation. Newton’s law of universal gravitation is not in accordance with
Einstein’s principle of covariance postulate in Special Relativity (SR) for a time dependent,
causal relationship independent of reference coordinate system (Lorentz frame). The
inverse square relation is illustrated in Fig. 33-2.
The gravitational flux intensity variation for a pair of point masses in the non-relativistic
Newtonian theory of gravity is illustrated in Fig. 33-3. As shown, the radial flux overlap
results in a dipolar Moiré fringe pattern of constructive and destructive interference.

Flux about a point mass

Fig. 33-2. Gravitational flux intensity from a point mass varies as 1/r2 in 3D space.

I had not thought of this regular decrease in gravity, namely that it is as the inverse square of the
distance; this is a new and highly remarkable property of gravity. – Christiaan Huygens

332
 33. Gravitation

Flux about coupled point masses

Fig. 33-3. Gravitational flux of two interacting masses produces Moiré pattern of
constructive and destructive interference of narrowband polarized (PV) spectrum
surrounding each mass or equivalently as broadband Electro-Gravi-Magnetic (EGM) paired
conjugate wavefunctions (gravitons) with momentary overlap and zero group velocity.

33.4 Comparison of gravity and electricity

The force of gravity between static masses given by Newton’s law is similar to
Coulomb’s law for the electrostatic force between static electric charges both varying as
1/r2. Based on this similarity, Maxwell speculated if gravitational attraction like
electrostatic attraction was ‘not also traceable to the action of the surrounding medium’ A
comparison of fundamental equations for each in terms of scalar potentials is summarized
in Table 33-1. In a sufficiently small localized region where the field gradient is low (i.e.,
linear), the field is approximately uniform. The force of gravity is attractive only wheras
electric force is attractive or repulsive. The force of gravity is weaker than electrostatic
force by a factor of ~1042 (Felec/Fgrav = q2/Ge0m2 = 4.17 x 1042) as gravity is an acceleration
field while an electrical field is a mass velocity dependent force field. The Newtonian
Gravitational constant G is assumed always positive. Gravitational fields change velocity
of EM waves while electromagnetic fields change EM direction. Based on Riemannian
geometry of curved manifolds, Clifford suggested that the force of gravity like
electromagnetic forces was the result of variation in curvature of higher-dimensional
spaces. Static potentials resemble dimples; waves resemble ripples; and particles resemble
knots. Analogous to electrostatic attraction, masses attract other masses via the
“gravitoelectric” field – a scalar potential effect. Similarly, moving masses attract each
other via the “gravitomagnetic” field – a vector potential effect. The Lense-Thirring effect
represents an example of gravitational drag anaologous to the electrokinetic effect.

333
33. Gravitation

The analogy between gravitation and electromagnetism has been developed extensively in a
gravitoelectro-magnetic description of Newton’s law with a gravitomagnetic field due to a
mass current. Theories advanced include gravitoelectromagnetism (GEM), Lorentz-
invariant theory of gravitation (LITG) and covariant theory of gravity (CTG). Similar to
Weber’s modification of Coulomb’s law, Holtzmüller (1870) and Tisserand (1872)
modified Newton’s law to include a force term as a function of relative velocity of the
attracting masses. Gerber (1898) proposed that the gravitational potential velocity of
transmission varies with relative velocity. Heaviside (1893) and Poincaré (1905) proposed
gravitation has two components, a gravitational field g proportional to the vector distance
between masses and a gravimagnetic or cogravitational field k which is a function of the
relative velocities. Jefimenko (1991) proposed a generalized Newton’s theory of
gravitation to include time-dependent interactions which satisfy the conservation of
momentum, principle of causality and principle of relativity. Weber’s electrodynamic force
between moving charges with time retardation yields wave equations for electric scalar and
magnetic vector potentials. Assis (1992) proposed a non-relativistic derivation of
gravitation from generalized Weber electrodynamics force between neutral dipoles
including terms of fourth and higher orders of ṙ12/c in which electrostatics is a zeroth-order
effect, magnetism and Faraday’s induction as a second-order effect, gravitation as a fourth-
order effect and inertia and perhelion precession as a sixth-order electromagnetic effect.
Analogous parameters in Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations in a vacuum and
gravitational equations are summarized in Table 33-2. The dimensionless electron fine
structure constant a (= e2/ħc ≅ 0.007297) has an analogous gravitational fine structure
constant aG (= GH2/ħc = (tPwC)2 ≅1.7518E-45) where H = mass of a nucleon, tP = Planck
time, wC = Compton angular frequency of the electron. Expressed in so-called ‘natural’
units (4pG = c = ħ = e0 = 1), the ratio a/aG (= (e/me)2 º 10-39) is a measure of the relative
strength of the electrostatic and gravitational forces between electrons.
The gravitomagnetic field Hg of mass currents is the mechanism held responsible for
frame-dragging or Lense-Thirring effect. These interactions are second order in v/c and
very weak as a result. Generation and spin alignment of plasma jets along the spin axis of
quasars and black hole nuclei is attributed to the gravitomagnetic field. Interaction with
the gravitomagnetic field results in accretion disc precession and jet alignment (Bardeen-
Petterson effect). The immense gravitomagnetic rotational energy of supermassive black
holes and conversion to relativistic plasma jets is known as the Blandford-Znajek
mechanism.

Half of science is putting forth the right questions. – Francis Bacon

Faraday’s idea was that it might be possible to convert electricity into gravity, or vice versa. The
grounds for his expectation were two theories he held, the unity of force and the conservation of
force. – William Berkson

In 1914, a Finnish physicist named Gunnar Nordstrom found that all you had to do to unify
gravity with electromagnetism was to increase the dimension of space by one. – Lee Smolin

It is known from oberved phenomena and established physics…that gravity, electromagnetism

and spacetime are interelated phenomena. These ideas have led to questioning if gravitational or
inertial forces can be created or modified using electromagnetism. – Marc Millis

Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp it - in a decade, a
century, or millenium - we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise. – J. A.
Wheeler

334
 Table 33-1. Comparison of gravity and electricity under static conditions*

Parameter Gravitation Units Electrostatics Units

charge m = mass = F/a = E/fg kg q = charge = F/E = E/fE Coulombs

= ħk/v = E/c2 = |V·q|/c2 = ħk/A = E/V = mc2/V
= m0/G = (fE·q)/c2 = m((wC + we/m)

3 -2
flux L = 4pGM ms fE = q/e0 volt·meter

-2 2 2
divergence of gradient ∇2f = - 4pGrm Poisson eqn sec ∇2f = -rmq/e0 Poisson eqn kg·C /sec
∇·g = - 4pGrm ∇·E = - rq/e0

-11 2 2 9 2 2
coupling constant G = ¼peg = 6.67262 x 10 N·m /kg kC = ¼pe0 = 8.987551 x 10 N·m /C
(Newton’s gravitational (Coulomb’s constant)
constant)

Uniform field

2
Field strength g = const. = -Df/Dx m/sec E = const. = -DV/Dx volts/m
= -∇f = -∇fg = -∇V = -∇fE
(acceleration of gravity, (electric field strength,
gravitational field strength) voltage gradient)
2 2
Force F = W = mg = -m∇fg = dL/dx kg·m/sec F = q+E = qV/r = -q∇fE kg(m/sec )
(Gravity force) =dP/dt =N (Coulomb force) =N

335
cont
33. Gravitation
44. Quantum Gravity
General Theory of Relativity is as yet incomplete insofar as it has been able to apply the general
principles of relativity satisfactorily only to gravitational fields. – A. Einstein

The quest for a quantum gravity is one of the greatest unsolved problems in all of science –
Michio Kaku

Space is imagined as a lattice made of nodes connected by edges… A physicist working without a
lattice is something like a trapeze artist working without a net. – Lee Smolin

44.1 Introduction

Quantum gravity theory purports to reconcile quantum theory describing elementary

particles and atoms with Einstein’s general theory of relativity describing events in curved
spacetime under the influence of gravity. Gravitation in an optical gravity theory is a result
of resonant electromagnetic (EM) wave interactions in a polarizable vacuum (PV) with a
variable refractive index. Gravitation is described by variation in EM wave energy and
density due to local variation in the vacuum refractive index KPV(r,w,M). Variation of the
vacuum refractive index and corresponding variation in the speed of light and provides a
mechanism for EM wave contraction effects. The electromagnetic field and photon/electron
interactions in quantum electrodynamics theory (QED) are quantized and has provided a
template for subsequent quantum field theories.
Two currently popular theoretical approaches to quantizing gravity are String/M-theory
and Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). In M-Theory, there are 10-dimensional strings in a
membrane in an 11-dimensional supergravity hyperspace. A complex 6-dimensional
Calibi-Yau manifold compactifies 6 of the 10 dimensions to a 4-D spacetime. 4D
spacetime is regarded as a ‘D-Brane’ hypersurface in a 11-dimensional superspace.
Particles represent vibrations of 1 dimensional Planck scale string objects in the Calibi-Yau
manifold including the graviton. Quantum gravity is described in terms of dynamic
intersecting, linking or knotting of loops. Particles of spin 1 and 2, i.e., the photon and
graviton, are massless and correspond to zero frequencies of the string. Higher frequencies
correspond to particles with mass in multiples of the Planck mass (mPlanck = 1019 GeV).
Electric charge is associated with open strings. Quarks are connected by open strings.
String loops in 4-D may include twists or rotations in the extra six internal dimensions or
degrees of freedom. In analogy with guitar strings, mass m may be associated with string
tension T (= mÿ4L2f2) although what the source of the tension in string theory is undefined.
The amplitude envelopes of closed strings form loops moving through spacetime.
Vibrations of the closed loops allow different energy levels corresponding to different
particles including boson/fermion supersymmetric partners. Despite intensive search,
supersymmetric particles have not been observed. String theory proponents argue string
theory is the only known way that includes gravity with other forces described by quantum
theory. A graviton in string theory is described by a quadrapole excitation of a closed loop
string. String theory comes in many different versions with various assumptions. What is
the composition of a string or how formed is undefined. With an odd number of spatial
dimensions and one temporal dimension, spacetime must be an even number. However,
chirality arises only with an odd number of spatial dimensions, which appears to preclude a
11-D supergravity manifold. String theory, like brane theory, appears as a fanciful,
metaphysical abstraction with little substance, an idea full of holes – a doily for the mind.

407
44. Quantum Gravity

Gravitons in quantum field theory (QFT) are usually regarded as massless, spin-2 bosons
propagating as perturbative quantum fluctuations (excitations) superimposed on a flat,
Minkowski spacetime metric

gmn = hmn + hmn (44-1)

where gmn is the resultant field metric, hmn is the background metric and hmn is the graviton
field which is a measure of deviation from the flat Minkowski metric. However, there is no
explanation for causal mechanism for variation in background metric such as gravity
waves, how the graviton field is generated or how exactly does gravitational attraction
occur via graviton exchange. In loop quantum gravity (LQG), space-time is quantized as a
network in which quantum numbers are assigned to nodes and linkages. GR is expressed in
terms of Ashtekar variables in which quantum areas are quantized.
In LQG, unlike M-Theory, higher dimensions are not required. Holonomy of curved
space is described in terms of rotational transformations around a loop. LQG does not
describe objects within spacetime unlike string theory and appears incompatible with
requirements of SR absent the effects of gravity and the principal of general covariance.
LQG as presently formulated does not include the graviton of QFT nor does it describe
other forces. QFT was formulated for flat spacetime and does not incorporate curved
spacetime of GR. Spin networks represent quantum states of the geometry of space. The
edges of spin networks correspond to discrete units of area while network nodes correspond
to quantized volumes in Planck units. The spin networks are relational objects said to
generate space. The geometry of spin networks may be adjusted to match a given metric.
A spin network represents causal linkages, however, the causal mechanism of gravity is
unclear as is just what is it that is spinning or the cause of spin.
Similar to the GR mathematical theory, both approaches attempt to quantize space and
time, ascribing physical properties to geometry rather than objects in spacetime. Neither of
these approaches address the fundamental nature of the physical vacuum. There is neither
explanation of the origin of electric charge, mass or spin nor are specific geometric models
proposed with characteristics matching particle observables. The mathematics of the
theories is complex and few verifiable predictions are advanced. Laboratory experimental
verification of string theory or loop quantum gravity appears at best remote if at all even
possible.

44.2 Quantum diagrams

A Feynman tree level vertex diagram representing the scattering of a pair of photons via
graviton resonance interaction (g + g* → gg* → g* + g ) is shown in Fig. 44-1. Graviton
gg* corresponds to the propagator. The 4-momentum conservation is maintained across
each vertex and for the sum of inputs and outputs overall:

pg - pg* = - pg*+ pg (44-2)

The momentum for s-, t-, and u-channel scattering is described by Mandelstam variables s,
t, and u.
2 2
s = (p1 + p2) = (p3 + p4) (44-3)
2 2
t = (p1 - p3) = (p2 - p4) (44-4)
2
u = (p1 – p4)2 = (p2 – p3) (44-5)
2 2 2 2
s + t + u = m1 + m2 + m3 + m4 (44-6)

408
 44. Quantum Gravity

The virtual graviton corresponding to the internal propagator is not directly observable.
There are two different physical interpretations in the Veneziano’s dual resonance model
with equivalent results. In t-channel scattering, the graviton is an unstable resonance
whereas in s-channel scattering, the graviton is viewed as an intermediate exchange
particle. Energy and momentum are transferred to each photon. The massless graviton
exists as a momentary resonance of phase conjugate photonic fields. The propagator is
represented as the product of the amplitudes. The spin-2 field results in wavefront
curvature and net acceleration transverse to the wavefront (spontaneous symmetry
breaking) with eikonal scattering of interacting photons away from the interaction region
center of rotation.

Graviton interactions

Fig. 44-1. Quantum vertex diagram illustrations of a massless spin-2 graviton gg* formed
by interference of a pair of phase conjugate counter-propagating photons g and g*.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking from a false vacuum state results in resultant photon
scattering.

What do you think about this? (Was meinen sie dazu)? – Wolfgang Pauli

Quantum Field Theory… is a beautiful but not very robust child. – Stephen Weinberg

409
44. Quantum Gravity

Gravitons are represented in string theory as the first excited mode of a Planck scale one
dimensional closed loop. In loop quantum gravity, spacetime is quantized in terms of spin
networks embedded in a topological curved manifold. The spin network is formed from
spinors with connecting lines representing allowable angular momentum (nħ/2). The spin
network describes spin angular momentum exchange between particles independent of a
specific coordinate system. The combination of loop variables in Planck units allows
embedding in a curved manifold such as described by GR with QM quantization. Loop
quantum gravity is nonperturbative and background independent. Supergravity attempts to
relate interacting fields of bosons and fermions via supersymmetry. Representations of
various quantum gravity approaches are illustrated in Fig. 44-2. The Barbero-Immirzi
parameter g0 = ln(2)/◊3p has been interpreted in loop quantum gravity as a normalized
Newton’s gravitational constant G although a geometrical derivation has not yet been
achieved.

Quantum gravity models

Fig. 44-2. Quantum diagram representations of symplectic structure spin loop networks. A
curvilinear finite-element mesh model of a spin network with second-order triangular or
tetrahedral elements requires six degrees of freedom (DOF) for each node with three DOF
to describe translation along the x, y, and z axes and three DOF to describe rotation about
the axes. A quantum scale representation corresponds to a reductionist viewpoint whereas
thermodynamics and general relativity corresponds to a description of emergent phenomena
as gravity becomes much weaker at length scales >> Planck scale (lP = tPc = ◊ħG/c3).

410
 44. Quantum Gravity

The origin of mass in quantum field theory is represented as symmetry breaking from a
symmetrical unstable vacuum state to an asymmetrical lower energy state. Various
representations involving transitions from unstable symmetrical potential energy states into
lower energy stable unsymmetrical states are illustrated in Fig. 44-3.

Quantum Field Symmetry Breaking

Fig. 44-3. Spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking from an unstable false vacuum state to a
lower energy state. Eg., Origin of Planck mass ±mP: S0 = {0} → S1 = {-mP < 0 < +mP}.

A soliton-soliton interaction in a spin network is illustrated in Fig. 44-4 representing a

particle interaction. A plot of the harmonic mean of two independent variables produces a
similar plot. Wave coupling occurs if the counter-propagating waves are close in frequency
with the interaction zone corresponding to the coherence range. The line of impact
corresponds to a decaying eigensolution (stable manifold) whereas the line of suppression
corresponds to an increasing eigensolution (unstable manifold). A typical trajectory
approaches the line of suppression as t → -∞ and approaches the line of impact as t → ∞.
A similar effect occurs in coupling of electromagnetic waves with polaritons exhibiting the
quantum phenomenon of level repulsion obeying a non-crossing rule. In a system of two
coupled oscillators of different natural frequencies, as the coupling strength increases the
lower frequency decreases while the higher frequency increases – an apparent frequency
repulsion effect.

Even the most sensible arguments for the existence of quantum gravity lack the gravitas of
experimental facts. – Natalie Wolchova

411
44. Quantum Gravity

Soliton-soliton interaction/particle collision

Fig. 44-4. Illustration of soliton-soliton interaction with time reversal invariance. The
saddle point represents the linear combination of a 3-edge vertex pair in a spin network.
Varying energy states such as e- - e- repulsion or bond angle obey a non-crossing rule.
Converging states do not cross if of the same symmetry. Avoided crossings such as
adiabatic transitions represent level repulsion as a consequence of nonpenetrability of
differing energy levels. Wavefront tangent vectors correspond to different symmetry states.
If counter-propagating waves are close in frequency, the waves couple to generate a single
frequency in the phase-locked region. Mandelstam variables relating energy and
momentum for elastic scattering of identical particles in s-, t-, and u-channels: s = (p1 +
p2)2, t = (p1 - p3)2, u = (p1 - p4)2. The particle trajectories resemble shear flow stream
functions contours in three dimensional fluid flow such as generated by two co-rotating
rollers. For n = 2, an example saddle function is f(x,y) = x2 – y2 which exhibits one saddle
point. v = (df/dy, -df/dx). The particle trajectories correspond to asymptotic lines of a
hyperbola in a stereographic projection on a Riemann sphere onto a tangent plane.

Primary causes are unknown to us; but are subject to simple and constant laws, which may be
discovered by observation, the study of them being the object of natural philosophy. – Joseph
Fourier

We’re unaware of the causes of most of the events we witness. – Ron Reed

Poincaré observed this phenomenon mathematically among colliding particles, which impart
some of resonances to each other leading to a degree of synchronized resonance. – R. Marion
and J. Bacon

412
45. Graviton Model

And so you will excuse me, Monsieur [Le Sage], if I still feel a very great repugnance for your
ultramundane corpuscles; and I would rather admit my ignorance of the cause of gravity than to
have recourse to hypotheses so strange. – Leonard Euler

They never called Einstein crazy. Well, they would have if he carried on like this. – Dr. Noah
(Casino Royale)

The hypothetical graviton is described as a spin 2 boson posited as the carrier of the
gravitational force. Photons are spin 1 bosons that are the carrier of the electromagnetic
force. While photons are readily detectable, the elusive gravitons have not been detected in
particle physics experiments and have remained mysterious. However, in terms of the
geometrical model of the photon previously defined, the geometry, mechanism for creation,
and inability for detection of the graviton may be understood. In the model described here,
the graviton gg* is averred to be a resonance interaction of a photon g and its phase
conjugate g*. The phase conjugate photon g* is generated upon reflection from an EM
wave interference pattern with nodal spacing comparable to the incident photon g. A
gravitating mass consists of a collection of EM oscillators (e.g., electrons, atoms,
molecules, etc) with a frequency range over the entire EM spectrum up to the Planck
frequency. The incident photon has phase and group velocities parallel and in the direction
of propagation. As previously described, a phase conjugate wave has phase and group
velocities anti-parallel with the phase velocity opposite to the direction of propagation. The
phase conjugate is not an anti-particle as the spins are in the same direction. As a result,
upon reflection, the phase conjugate photon spin adds to that of the incident photon (1s + 1s
= 2s). The phase conjugate photon has an identical frequency and wavelength of the
incident photon. The graviton wave train length at any given instant is the momentary
length of the overlap region. The graviton resonance interaction is not directly observable,
however, the gravitational effects may be observable. The effect of the resonance
interaction is to locally increase the energy density of the Planck vacuum increasing the
refractive index KPV and gravitational gamma G.
Graviton formation from a counter-propagating photon and phase-conjugate photons is
illustrated in Fig. 45-1 in terms of Whittaker[120,121] scalar potentials. The wave equation
describes the evolution of the wave function with time. In addition, the wave function also
describes the evolution of the complex conjugate wave function in time. The complex
conjugate wave is a time-reversed replica of the wave equivalent to wave propagating
backward in time. Unlike the Wheeler – Feynman absorber theory of radiation proposed in
1945, there no advanced wave propagating backward in time to interact with the retarded
wave propagating forward in time.
Schematic diagrams of resonance interaction of a pair of phase-conjugate photons is
shown in Figs. 45-2 and 45-3 illustrating graviton formation. As shown, a phase-conjugate
pair of counter-propagating spin 1 photons (RH helix, LH helix) interfere to give rise to a
spin 2 graviton (helicoid). The graviton has two helicity states with a spin projection on the
propagation direction equal to ≤2, hence, the gravitational field has two degrees of
freedom. Unlike electromagnetic charge, vortices of opposite spin repel resulting in
deflection of the photon wave vectors. Fields carried by exchange particles with odd
integer spins with aligned spin vectors are repulsive whereas those with opposed spins are
attractive. Even spins lead to attractive forces proportional energy content and varies as 1/r2.
For a spin-2 graviton, the polarization rotational phase change corresponds to e2iq and e-2iq.

413
45. Graviton Model

In the graviton model illustrated, the linear momentum is zero. Hence, a freely-
propagating graviton as such is not predicted to exist. In addition, the theoretic Ivanenko
process (2g → e- + e+) in which two gravitons collide head-on to create matter, an electron
and positron, does not occur as the relative velocity is zero. The effect of gravity is not due
to the momentum exchange of gravitons in billiard ball fashion, but rather is a harmonic
resonance phenomena of quantum oscillators mediated by photons. The photon and
graviton flux alters the local vacuum energy density of aggregated concentrations of matter.
As in quantum field theory, the massless spin-2 graviton model illustrated has just two
helicity states. In string theory, bosons, including gravitons, form closed loops. Similar to
string theory, the periphery of the graviton represented here forms a closed loop. As the
graviton (hmn) carries energy, it contributes to the gravitational field energy density and the
energy-momentum tensor. A gravity wave as a function of time may be represented as hmn
= Amnsin(t – c/c). Gravitational waves gmn(x) as a coherent states of many gravitons may be
considered as excitation of the background metric where the metric is not the Minkowski
spacetime hab, but the electromagnetic field interference pattern metric hmn: gmn(x) = hmn +
x
hmn. The gravitational wave amplitude is the sum of two polarizations: gmn = h+emn+ + hxemn
where “ + ” and “x” denote polarization directions.

Counter-propagating traveling harmonic waves f(x,t) @ fixed instant t

Fig. 45-1. Illustration of resonance interaction of counter-propagating phase-conjugate

photons represented as counter-propagating scalar potential waves. Continuous mono-
chromatic waves are spatially and temporally coherent with infinite coherence length lc =
l2/2Dl as the waves remain in phase for an infinite distance. Pulsed wave coherence
duration is equal to the wave train duration. Linear momentum p (= ħk) cancels to zero.

It is by logic we prove, but it is by intuition we discover. To know how to criticize is good, to

know how to create is better. – Henry Poincaré

We all try. You succeed. – Humpfrey Bogart (Casablanca)

There are very few things which we know, which are not capable of being reduced to a
Mathematical Reasoning; and when they cannot it’s a sign our knowledge of them is very small
or confus’d. – Kurt Gödel

Gravitons are the avatars of general covariance. – Frank Wilczek

414
 45. Graviton Model

A graviton corresponds to transient standing wave produced as incident and phase

conjugate reflected travelling photon waves cross during an overlap period upon reflection.
The bi-directional traveling harmonic wave pattern is similar to the diatonic interference
pattern energy flow model in music theory correlated to the exchange and energy flow in a
standing wave for example, such as represented as y = sin(2x) and y = -sin(2x). Harmonic
interference theory suggests geometric patterns of a graviton field arise as a result of
interference of reflected harmonic waves with resonance and amplification at harmonic
frequency multiples.
The propagation velocity and frequency of photon wave quanta are dependent on the
gravitation potential which is influenced by the action of graviton flux. Gravitons are
associated with gravitational waves generated from mass oscillations such as binary stars,
exploding or collapsing stars, etc. Gravity is far weaker than other forces; coupling of
gravitational waves/gravitons to matter fields is weak. Macken has shown for a pair of
electrons in terms of Planck units, the electromagnetic force Fe/p = (wc)2/N2 while the
gravitational force Fg/P = (wC)4/N2. where wc is the Compton frequency and N is a
dimensionless ratio of separation distance r divided by the Compton length RC. That Fg/P =
Fe/P2 is a consequence that EM forces are proportional to e2 mediated by exchange of a pair
of virtual photons (wc1wc2) whereas gravitational forces are proportional to m2 mediated by
exchange of a pair of virtual photons and a pair of phase conjugate photons (wc1wc2)2.

Spin 2 Graviton gg*

Fig. 45-2. Diagram of graviton formation from coupling of a pair of counter-propagating

phase-conjugate photons. The phase conjugate photon g* is a time-reversed replica of the
incident photon g. The graviton has spirality with spin projection s on the propagation
direction k equal to ±2. Spin angular momentum is additive (s = 2ħ). Helicity H cancels..

The energy of gravitons is proportional to frequency (E = 2hn). Emitted gravitational

waves are of low energy and notoriously difficult to detect. Similar to Delbrück scattering
of photons by photons, gravitons should likewise undergo scattering interactions. The
strength of graviton scattering interactions vary with frequency, the probability of
interactions described by the vertex in terms of the fine structure constant. The higher the
frequency of gravitons, the greater the strength of interaction.

415
45. Graviton Model

Frolov[118] has proposed a gravitation concept as a paired process of radiation and

gravitation. In terms of duality of action: Radiation is emission of photons from a mass
object; gravitation is the absorption of photons by a mass object. Material mass, in other
words, represents the absorption and transformation of electromagnetic waves. Radiation
emission is associated with a contraction of mass and absorption with an increase in mass.
The instability of the interaction of phase-conjugate photons arises as the result of the
phase-conjugate wave has negative action (A = -h) producing a negative energy state (E =
-hn) in which the group velocity is opposite to the spin vector. This false vacuum
instability (E = hn - hn = 0) results in spontaneous symmetry breaking as represented by the
Higgs potential and resultant photon scattering. Storti and Diemer[33] maintain that dark
energy is in the form of conjugate photons (i.e., gravitons) which would account for the
observational difficulty for direct detection. Conjugate photons are a feature of the Electro-
Gravi-Magnetic (EGM) quantized theory of gravity.
A vector diagram of graviton formation from phase conjugate beams is depicted in Fig.
45-3. The graviton arises from a photon gauge field and its phase conjugate emergent from
an interference network lattice containing quantum spins. The graviton has only two
polarizations: parallel or anti-parallel to the wave vector k. The rotational phase change
varies as e2iq and e-2iq. A spin 1 photon g and its counter-propagating phase conjugate g*
are both described as a helix. The spin 2 graviton gg* conforms to a helicoid geometry.
Each represent minimal ruled surfaces. The curvature and torsion characteristics of each
are illustrated in Fig. 45-4. Coupling of counter-propagating photon (right hand helicity)
and phase-conjugate photon (left hand helicity) results in creation of false vacuum
instability and photon scattering. Gravitation phenomena appears associated with photon
wave-function pairing in a phase conjugate mixing interaction in which energy density is
momentarily reduced to a false vacuum state as a result of vector addition of conjugate
phase amplitudes. The massless spin 2 graviton gg* has just two helicity states. Spins are
additive as chirality equals helicity resulting in a spin (torsion) field with no net
longitudinal momentum transfer ( S  = 0). Hence, gravitons have negligible interaction
cross-section with matter.

Some years ago, Pauli and Fierz considered the question, what relativistic wave equations would
be appropriate for particles of zero rest mass and spin two. Now in a relativistic theory for spin S,
2(2S + 1) components are needed, so a second-rank tensor is required… Since the only available
direction is the direction of motion, it follows that the spin angular momentum must be oriented in
the direction of motion. Since the gravitational forces have infinite range, it follows that the rest
mass of the graviton must be zero. – Joseph Weber

Provando e riprovando. (trying and trying again) – Academia del Cimento motto

Everthing flows and nothing persists, or nothing endures. – Heraclitis

In Terra inest virtus, quae Lunam dei. (There is a force in the earth which causes the moon to
move) – Johannes Kepler

Real gravitons make up what classical physicists would call gravitational waves, which are very
weak – and so difficult to detect that they have not yet been observed. – Stephen Hawking

The new mathematics, which is responsible for the merger of these two theories [Riemann
geometry of Einstein’s theory and Lie Groups coming from quantum theory] is topology, and it is
responsible for accomplishing the seemingly impossible task of abolishing the infinities of a
quantum theory of gravity. – Michio Kaku

Terrans are known for their stupidity. – Philip K. Dick

416
 Fig. 45-3. Graviton formation by phase conjugate coupling of counter-propagating photons. Spins are additive (s = 1 + 1 = 2).
45. Graviton Model

417
418
45. Graviton Model

Fig. 45-4. Graviton gg* and photon g curvature k and torsion t characteristics represented as a helicoid and helix, respectively.
46. Nonlinear Gravitational Field

Mass is associated with energy (i.e., wave function curvature) according to the Einstein
mass-energy relation (E = mc2) including gravitational energy. Consequently, both mass
and gravitational energy are sources of gravitation. For mass concentrated at a point, the
associated gravitational field has negative energy (-mc2) equal to the positive mass-energy
of matter (+mc2). Rest mass produces a distortion field by transformation of energy.
Condensation of matter produces an equal and opposite reaction: extraction of mass-energy
from the vacuum: positive mass material and negative mass vacuum. Negative mass
vacuum states may be described by contraction of dimensional spacetime coordinates. See
Fig. 46-1. According to GR, gravitational energy becomes more negative as the mass
density of an object increases as the volume contracts under the action of gravity. In the PV
model, spacetime 4D mathematical construct remains Euclidean and the apparent
contraction represents instead the contraction of electromagnetic wavelengths.

Fig. 46-1. EM wavelength increase corresponds to apparent time dilation and EM

frequency increase corresponds with apparent space contraction of GR theory which posits
curvature of spacetime. Change in wavelength Dl varies with change in light velocity c (=
Dc/Dn). The orthogonal harmonic grid lattice of standing waves illustrated represents a
metric connecting nodal points of EM waves. For a curved metric, the line element ds2 =
m n
gmndx dx . Gravitational redshift frequency n∞ = nem◊(1 – 2GM/c2r) where n∞ = frequency
measured by a distant observer and nem = source emission frequency. Doppler frequency
shift (decoherence) is given by n0 = nem(1 – v/c) = nem(1 – gh/c2) = nem(1 - 2Dnh/c) where n0
= measured velocity by an observer moving with relative velocity v, g = acceleration of
gravity and h = height (vertical distance between source emitter and observer).

Winterberg[7] observes that negative gravitational field energy density implies negative
mass which is one of the principal assumptions of the Planck aether hypothesis in which the
physical vacuum is composed of an equal number of positive and negative Planck mass
particles. See Fig. 46-2. The negative energy density of a gravitational field and positive
energy density of mass may be understood as polarization effects of Planck dipoles in a

419
 Index

Index gyromagnetic ratio 205-7, 240, 657

magnetic moment 205, 207, 240
antenna 5, 6, 71, 88, 91, 95-9, 116, 122,
A
156, 159, 235-6, 357, 426, 430, 493-5,
acceleration 509, 511- 2, 514, 518, 550, 552-3,
centrifugal 289, 369, 425, 632 555, 594, 598 ,677
centripetal 227 anti-gravity 71, 379, 502, 507, 526, 573
of geodesics 80, 434-5 Archimedean spiral 152, 235-9, 380
of gravity xi, 82, 328, 335, 365, 367, arrhythmia 328, 448, 463, 471
369, 372-6, 381, 419-20, 424, 434, Ashworth, D. G. 231
436, 445-6, 448, 451-3, 456, 462, Assis, A. 227, 334
470-1, 486, 502, 507, 511, 515-6,
522, 525-7, 541, 544, 572, 574,
B
579, 594, 598-9, 617, 636 Babinet 236, 556
action 166, 239, 243, 305-8, 330-2, 378, ball lightning 529, 552, 554
405, 416, 429, 432, 450, 477, 515, barium titanate 60, 321, 490
633 Barnett effect xi, 15, 207, 487, 572
active mass 93-4, 363, 369, 371, 462, Barrow, J. 361, 363
504, 509, 515, 532-3, 572 baryons 275, 288, 290
Adler equation 457 basis vector 1, 52, 315, 523, 624, 667
aether ix, 13-4, 25, 34, 132, 138, 141, beat frequency 86, 120, 369, 474, 478-9,
546, 551, 554-5, 602
240, 319, 329, 419-20, 519
beat frequency oscillator (BFO) 478
affine Beltrami flow 23, 156
connection 18, 50, 52, 79 Bergman, D. 148, 160-3, 230
isometries 40 binary sequence 609
manifold 18 binding energy 34, 84, 141, 284, 375,
parameter 435 502, 552
plane 677 Birkeland current 23
space 624 Bjerknes effect 349-50, 352
torsion 52 blackbody radiation 45, 432-3, 451, 543,
transformations 50 549-50, 552, 568
Aharonov-Bohm effect 25, 126, 269 black hole 18-9, 21, 71, 79, 80-1, 133,
234, 334, 357, 359, 372-3, 379, 403,
Airy
594, 677
diffraction 288, 291-2 Bloch sphere 95, 100, 598, 624
disc 65, 288-9 blueshift xi, 83-4, 107-9, 116-7, 124, 128,
Akimov, A. 357, 450 130, 166, 212, 485-6, 489, 511, 529,
Allen, H. S. 148 556-7, 561
amplituhedron 440 Bohr
angular momentum ix, x, 1, 15-8, 29, 34, magneton 151, 205-7, 301
radius 39, 164, 170, 228, 279
37, 39, 42, 47, 51, 132, 149, 151, 166,
Boltzman 552\
205-7, 220, 228, 239, 243, 246-7, 250, Boscovitch, R. 349
255-7, 267, 278, 284, 360, 378, 380, Bose-Einstein
410, 495, 507, 558, 583, 593, 623, condensate (BEC) ix, 13-4, 17, 34, 47,
629, 657, 663 133, 147, 247, 317, 353
anholonomy 249-50, 252-3 statistics 246-7
annihilation, electron/positron ix, x, 22, boson ix, xiii, 1, 13-4, 34, 40, 87, 149,
207, 210, 246-7, 273-4, 277, 288,
124, 148-9, 208-11, 220, 222-3, 270,
304, 405, 407-8, 413-4
289, 300 Boutorin, G. 357, 450
anomalous Bragg
dispersion 9, 11,84, 108, 122, 302, angle 514
357, 451 diffraction 68-9, 111-2, 440-3

685
 Index
Bragg (cont) cogravitation, (See also gravito-
interference 60, 432, 490 electromagnetism)
law 68 field 329, 334, 338, 340, 368, 424,
mirror 83-4 572, 578, 581-2, 585-6, 605, 631
reflection 69 vector potential 340, 367
reflector 60, 111, 432, 496 color charge 247-8, 256-7, 275-6, 288-9,
resonator 588, 590-1 295, 298
Bravais lattice 69, 70, 440, 668 commutator 250, 252
Breit-Wheeler complex
decay 149 conjugate 124, 260, 312, 413, 497
pair production 209 index of refraction 57-8, 509
bremsstrahlung 149, 299, 483 numbers 20, 111, 141, 258-64
Brillouin 111, 113, 429-30, 667 phasor 19-20, 88, 90, 111, 114, 124-6,
Bronstein-Penrose hypercube 623, 671-2 129, 210-11, 217, 263-4, 497, 503
Brown, Thomas Townsend 318 Compton, A.H. 148
frequency xii, 45, 49, 98, 110, 151,
C 153-7, 166, 210, 218, 230-1, 235-6,
238, 240, 334, 357, 388-9, 432, 451,
Cahill, K. 379 601, 603
Calder & Lahov 361 wavelength xii, 14, 39, 83-4, 98, 102,
Cantor set 664 110, 149, 151-2, 156, 212, 215, 217-
Carroll, R. 148 8, 220, 236, 238, 287, 478
Casimir effect 13, 40, 329, 426, 432, 588 radius x, 15, 19, 149, 151-2, 154-5,
Catt, I. 25 160, 228, 231-2, 235-8, 278, 288,
Cavendish 378 292, 360, 388-9, 391, 393-4
Cherenkov radiation xi, 8, 149, 299, 487 scattering 149, 209
charge, conservation
definition and units of 239, 639 baryon no. 295
color 247-8, 256-7, 275-6, 288-9, 295, charge 208, 263
298 energy 17, 20, 50, 226, 253, 329, 435,
electric ix-xii, 1, 15, 16, 32, 34, 37-9, 589
41, 92, 151-3, 159, 166, 225, 230, momentum 17-8, 38, 50, 334, 408,
239, 239, 240, 242, 246, 249, 269, 483, 589
271-3, 335 consonance 426, 602, 604, 606, 610, 615,
fractional 270-4, 290 617
gravitational 331, 337 contracted moving standing wave xi, 86,
hypercharge 276-7, 290, 298 88, 90, 98, 102, 104, 118-9, 128, 130,
isotopic 276-7 166, 210, 212-3, 215-7, 465, 485-9,
path trajectory 1, 148, 151, 153-4, 490, 493-4, 498-9, 500, 528, 530, 555,
205 557, 560, 614
Planck 7, 21, 57, 202, 384, 389, 391, contragravity 493
394 Cooper pairs 160, 246, 318
radius 152, 205, 239, 279-83 covariance 26, 40, 52, 93-4, 225, 315-6,
screening 13, 289, 294 334, 368, 408
topological x, 16-7, 32, 37, 39, 41, 52, Coulomb
220, 240, 249, 258, 269-72, 289, constant 44, 225, 228, 231, 245, 335,
626, 666 341, 624, 639, 671-2
vortex 16, 34, 246 dimensional conversion 37-8, 41, 162,
chiral 10, 15, 65, 117, 152-3, 227, 239, 240, 242, 335, 624, 639
247, 271, 302, 304, 408, 412, 416, force 38, 76, 225-7, 236-8, 288-9,
526, 597 290, 294, 333, 335, 441, 643
chromatic equally-tempered scale 601-6, gauge 27
613, 615-6 Coulomb’s law, 225, 383
Clausius-Mossotti factor 319-20 generalized 226
Clausius Vivial theorem 231 Cornu spiral 135, 675
clock xi, 78, 88, 101, 108, 122, 328, 349, Cosmological constant 14, 132, 135, 316,
391, 445, 447, 457 361, 368, 402

686
 Index
coupled oscillators xii, 128, 328, 349-50, phase velocity 141, 366
375, 411, 457-62, 465, 471, 479, 502, wavelength 84, 87, 102, 110, 141, 212,
532, 608, 611 216-8, 366, 514, 544, 548, 569
covariant theory of gravity (CTG) 334 deceleration 84, 124, 140, 149, 162, 484,
cubic roots 270, 276 498, 526-7, 603
current deflection of light xi, xii, 76-9, 80-1, 101,
electric x, 15, 21, 25, 27-8, 38, 87, 328, 441, 532, 593
92, 96, 98, 126, 148, 151-3, 155, Delbrück effect 13, 415
158-60, 205, 225, 230, 263, 441, Depp, J. 76
625, 643 Desiato, T. 369
mass 14-5, 32, 37, 92, 135, 270, 278, de Sitter,
303, 334, 337, 346, 424, 437, 529, anti de Sitter 250
531, 570-4, 579, 589, 638 cosmology 379
curvature precession 231
extrinsic 146, 309, 440, 687 space 250
Gaussian 52, 309, 418, 434-5, 440, Devil’s pitchfork rotation 675
621, 627 Devil’s staircase 457
geodesic 15, 17, 50, 435 Dicke, R. 76, 328, 441
intrinsic 50, 146, 250, 309, 418, 627 dielectric constant xii, 15, 53, 56-7, 59, 76,
mean 1, 309, 617 78, 94, 101, 321, 328-9, 371, 426,
principal 309 431-2, 556
radius of 51, 146, 595, 627 dielectrophoresis 318-9, 483
Ricci 276, 316-7, 401, 406, 434-6, 440 dielectrophoretic force 318-22
Riemann 276, 316, 402-3, 405-6, 434- Diemer, G. 369, 416, 429, 452
5 differential forms
scalar 1, 3, 4, 43, 82, 146, 220, 244, 0-forms 52
401, 406, 434, 627 1-forms 52
spiral 236 2-forms 52
wavefront xi, xiv, xv, 17, 18, 60, 76, 3-forms 52
79-82, 308, 409, 432, 592 diffraction 65, 68-72, 11-2, 160, 269, 288,
wavefunction 15, 19, 164, 243, 308, 291-2, 440-3, 551
369 diffractive lens 288, 426
Weyl 276, 316, 434-6, 440 dimensions,
cycloid 231 conversion of 37, 41-4, 242-5, 624-62,
cyclotron 664
frequency 195 dipole,
radius 169 antenna 5, 6, 91, 95-7, 156, 236, 487,
511-6
D gravitational 142-3, 588-9, 590, 594,
596-8
Darboux frame 50 moment 144, 206, 290, 299, 318-23,
dark energy (quintessence) xiii, 14, 19, 586,588, 590, 640, 637
21, 23, 132, 141, 317, 361-2, 380, oscillator 1, 95, 478-9, 482-3
399-400, 416, 441, 496, 592, 675 Planck ix, xiii, 1, 13-21, 23, 29, 31-7,
dark matter 14, 21, 34, 300, 346-8, 362, 132-3, 144, 151, 155, 159, 276,
400, 597 289, 294, 303, 421, 597
Davies, P.A. 231 rotating 132-7, 145, 151, 155, 158,
Davies-Unruh effect 13, 121, 472 295, 388, 592
Daywitt, W.C. 15, 379, 402 vortices 13, 132-7, 158, 235, 300, 405,
de Broglie 592
contracted 212, 216 waves 141, 156, 159, 166, 246, 362
frequency 87, 110-1, 366, 534, 544, 567 Dirac, P.A.M.,
matter wave xi, 84, 129, 166, 210, 218, constant 30, 35, 37, 95, 137, 201, 276,
306, 353, 365, 529 353, 371
radius 169 large number hypothesis 378
synthesized 113, 124, 126, 129-30, neutrino 299
141, 486-7, 588 sea 13-4, 379

687
 Index
spinors 135, 267 electric dipole moments (EDM) 53, 144,
statistics 247 289-90, 299, 318, 320-1, 640
dissonance 350, 360, 426, 527, 602, 604, electric field intensity ix, 14, 17, 26, 29,
606, 610-1, 615 35, 38, 51, 53, 56, 76, 79, 95, 144,
Doppler 320, 441, 507, 511, 554 ,642
effect 93, 104 electric flux lines 99, 100, 144, 155, 240,
frequency shift xi, 101-2, 104, 110, 343, 641-2
116, 375, 449, 471, 474, 555 electric permittivity xii, 33, 56, 59, 76, 78,
inverse effect xi, 116-7, 122, 128 92, 117, 160, 225, 240, 305, 328, 343,
simulated/synthesized 113, 118-21, 382-4, 396, 398, 441, 503, 505, 507,
128, 130, 479, 485-93, 530, 555, 581, 597, 651
560-1, 591 electrodynamic force
wavelength 102, 108-9, 118, 215-16 Ampere 226
dreibein (triad) 1, 98, 405 Assis 227
Drinkwater, A. x, 83, 375 Grassman 226
Dröscher, W. and Häuser, L. 400 Klyuschin 226-7
du Châtelet, E. 17 Lucas 227
Dwyer, J. 348 Neuman 226
dyad 19, 20-3, 134, 146, 315, 613, 675 Weber 226, 334
Dyatlov, V. 15 Whittaker 226
electro-gravi-magnetic (EGM) 452, 594,
E 672
electromagnetic spectrum 45-9, 121, 357,
Eaton lens 70, 74 451
Einstein, A., electromagnetic vector potential xi, xiii,
Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) ix, 14-7, 25-8, 32, 34, 37-8, 43, 78-9, 82-
13-4, 34, 47, 133, 147, 317, 353 3, 95, 98, 124, 126, 159, 162, 239-40,
Bose-Einstein statistics 246-7 244, 259, 260, 266, 305, 334, 340,
constant 203, 234, 380, 401-2, 406 353, 365-6, 405, 431, 507, 574, 584,
cosmological constant 14, 132, 135, 614, 655
316, 361, 368, 402 electromagnetic energy density 223, 304,
Einstein-de Haas effect xi, 15 319, 431, 502, 504, 509, 511-2, 515,
energy-mass relationship 17, 39, 79, 526, 551, 553, 561, 574, 617, 630
83, 110, 133, 234, 306, 353, 374, electromotive force (EMF) 13, 17, 158-9,
379, 419, 511, 594 226, 228, 259, 288, 298-9, 333, 346,
equivalence principle 365, 374, 570 394, 413, 415, 641
field equation 316, 361, 380, 401-2, electrostatic field energy 230, 645
404 electron,
general relativity (GR) xiii, xiv, 9, 76, capacitance 27, 160, 162, 165, 230,
78, 166, 316, 328, 361, 372, 378, 639
401, 441, 445, 588, 614, 624, 671-2 characteristics 148, 151-3, 168-204
gravitational lens 71, 75-6, 79 charge ix, x, 1, 15, 16, 32, 34, 37-9,
prinicple of covariance 40, 315, 332, 41, 92, 151-3, 159, 166, 225, 230,
368, 408 239, 239, 240, 242, 246, 249, 269,
special relativity (SR) 94, 98, 260, 332, 271-3, 335, 507, 552, 571, 624,
372, 614, 624, 672 639, 670
stress-energy tensor 93, 98, 260, 332, charge-to-mass ratio xii, 166, 206, 230,
372, 614, 624, 672 239, 240, 644
electric charge, ix, x, xii, 1, 15-7, 32, Compton frequency xii, 45, 49, 98,
25-7, 34, 37-9, 41, 53, 56, 81, 92, 110, 151, 156-7, 166, 168, 210,
95, 98, 135, 137, 148-55, 159, 218, 231, 235-7, 392, 415, 432,
162, 166, 225, 230, 239, 239, 240, 451, 601, 603
242, 246, 249, 258, 269-74, 278, Compton radius x, 15, 19, 149, 151-2,
295, 305, 337,393, 404, 624, 639 154-5, 160, 228, 231-2,
dimensions and units of 239, 639 235-8, 278, 288, 292, 360, 388-9,
elementary particles 170, 248, 279, 391, 393-4
283, 295-7, 301, 669 electrostatic field energy 230, 645

688
 Index
electron (cont) de Broglie 84, 87, 102, 110, 141,
energy storage 135, 162, 312 212, 216, 218, 366, 514, 544, 548,
g-factor 149, 205-6, 230 567
gyromagnetic factor 205-6 electromagnetic field tensors 404
gyromagnetic ratio 206-7, 657 electron impedance 228
inductance 27, 87, 92, 160, 162, 165, electron-positron pair production ix, 13,
230, 374, 664, 653, 666, 670 50, 148-9, 208-11, 218, 220-1, 223
magnetostatic field energy x, xii, 43, electron-positron annihilation ix, 22,
154, 159, 160, 163, 167, 230-1, 124, 148-9, 208-11, 220, 222-3, 270,
244, 261, 391, 396, 483, 593-4, 289, 300
624, 649 electron volts (eV) 16, 45, 83, 149, 159,
magnetic moment 15, 149, 205-7, 223- 165-6, 208, 220, 279, 280-3, 296, 299,
4, 240, 278, 280, 284, 300, 303, 300-4, 552
322, 571, 646 elementary particles 248
mass ix-xi, 13-6, 21, 34, 38, 41, 82-4, energy
87, 89, 92-3, 98, 116, 140, 142-3, dark xiii, 14, 19, 21, 23, 132, 141, 143,
151, 154, 223, 235, 238, 242, 247, 317, 361-2, 379-80, 400, 416, 441,
253, 273, 279, 374, 393, 624, 671 496, 502, 592, 597, 675
mass deficit 141, 234-5 electrostatic 43, 98, 159, 160, 167,
orbital magnetic moment 206, 646 230-1, 239
point charge (source) 38, 95, 155, 367, kinetic 17, 25, 37, 79, 83, 91, 94, 117,
385 129, 132, 159, 162, 164, 166, 210,
potential well 168 219, 231, 234, 253, 289-90, 296,
precession x-xiii, 16, 32, 34, 38-9, 41, 300, 305, 307, 329, 364, 482, 496,
135, 137, 144,150-1, 153-4, 158, 502, 507, 509, 561-2, 572, 574,
168, 205, 207, 223, 227, 229-32, 576, 601, 605
234, 239-40, 245-7, 252-5, 272, magnetostatic x, xii, 43, 154, 159,
289-90, 299, 391, 393, 593, 624, 160, 163, 167, 230-1, 244, 261,
663, 669, 671-2 391, 396, 483, 593-4, 624, 649
radius potential x, 17-8, 26, 39, 79, 84, 90-1,
classical 149, 152, 164, 169, 189, 129, 142, 149, 210, 226, 231, 260,
208, 228 289-90, 307-8, 318-9, 329, 346,
charge 152, 188, 205, 239 353, 364, 375, 470, 472, 479, 482,
Compton x, 15, 39, 149, 151-2, 154- 502, 509, 573, 594, 596, 605, 614,
5, 160, 164, 169, 228, 232, 237-8, Planck ix, 18, 29, 79, 132-3, 136, 202,
360 299, 389, 594
cyclotron 169 vs. momentum 89
de Broglie 169 entangled pair 21, 95, 100, 156, 429
electromagnetic 188-9, 228 entropy 18-21, 29, 44, 134, 245, 592, 625,
mass 152, 188, 205, 232, 359 629, 676, 629
poloidal 152, 188 epicycloid (nephroid) 271
spindle 152 epitrochoid (limacon) 153, 205
toroidal 149, 152, 220 equivalence of gravitational and inertial
Zitterbewegung 151-2, 164, 198, mass 143, 365, 374, 570
231 etalon 65, 116
ring 189 Euler’s
Schwarzschild 193 angles 265
sphere 149, 189 characteristic 52, 663
spin magnetic moment 149, 205-7, 223, identity 203, 663
278, 636 number 52, 663
spin density wave 159, 166, 246 spiral 2
wavelength Evans, M.W.
Compton xii, 14, 39, 83-4, 98, 102, Evans-Cartan field equation 401, 406
110, 149, 151-2, 156, 212, 215, gravity and electromagnetism 26, 333,
217-8, 220, 236, 238, 287, 478 335-344, 368, 404, 406
tetrad 1-3, 26, 402, 406

689
 Index

F 5, 432, 438, 447-8, 470, 484, 502-

3, 507, 511
Fabry-Pérot interferometer 65-6 inertial 82, 84, 142, 167, 374, 380, 572-
false vacuum 16, 136, 317, 409, 416 3
Fano lift 323, 325, 537, 541, 543, 556
planes 667-8 Lorentz 27, 82, 121, 207, 224, 323,
Faraday. D. 341, 346
field lines 17, 37, 144 magnetic 341
induction 25, 334 magnetophoretic 322
inverse effect xi maximum repulsion 228, 278, 391
law 342 magnetomotive (M.M.F) 158-9, 649
rotation effect x, 220, 22, 224, 488, non-uniform 318
556, 588 Planck 298, 379, 391, 394, 402
Fermi-Pasta-Ulam 35 ponderomotive 87-8, 119, 124, 323,
Feynman, R. 229 551, 489, 529, 551, 561
Feynman diagrams 208, 408 pressure 167, 352, 537, 556
Fibonacci radiation 87-8, 119, 124, 323, 541
damping ratios 48, 426, 607-10, 618 strong nuclear 275, 288-90, 298-9, 406
Fibonacci (cont) tension 167
harmonic intervals 602, 604, 607-8, tidal 276, 380, 403, 435-7
615 tension 167
sequence 604, 606, 609, 612, 615 Van der Waals 321, 378
Fierz, M. and Pauli, W. 404 Weber electrodynamic 226-7, 334
fine structure constant xii, 7, 15, 18, 154, four-wave mixing (FWM) 55, 111-3, 117-
205-6, 228-31, 236, 246-7, 334, 380, 8, 128, 440, 485-6, 489, 498, 551, 561
394, 416, 671-2 degenerate (DFWM) 113
inverse xii, 154, 166, 228, 232, 240, nondegenerate (NDFWM) 113, 128, 485,
247 561
force flat spacetime 33, 52, 77, 93, 162, 166,
acceleration xii, 15, 79, 83-4, 374, 482, 250, 372, 404, 408, 442
496, 594, 632 Euclidean xi, xii, 76, 78, 101, 250,
buoyant 436 276, 307, 315, 371, 382, 402, 406,
Casmir 13, 40, 329, 426, 432, 578 417, 419, 595
centifugal 137, 255, 425, 632 Fleming left-hand rule 325, 574
cogravitation 341, 424, 437 Fleming, I. 229
compressive 167 flux
Coriolis 575 cogravitational 340
Coulomb 76, 225-7, 238, 240, 288-9, crawler 508
441 electromagnetic radiation xii, 5, 17,
dielectrophoretic 27, 318-21 76, 88, 95, 97-9, 100, 144-5, 155,
dynamic gravitation 341 157-8, 161
electrokinetic 25-6, 82, 98, 124, 437 electric 99, 100, 144, 155, 240, 343,
electromagnetic 121, 228, 288, 298, 507-8, 641
298-9, 333, 346, 394 energy 14, 122, 329, 402, 426, 516,
electromagnetic Magnus 323 561, 630, 633
electromotive (E.M.F.) 17, 158-9, 259 gravitational 101, 332-3, 339, 343,
electrophoretic 298 368, 424, 432-3, 524
electrostatic 225, 236, 333, 335-6, 383- luminous 659-61
4, 394 magnetic 16-7, 51, 76, 79, 92, 158,
electroweak 247, 298-9, 406 160, 220, 224, 240, 322-4, 339-40,
gravikinetic drag 438 441, 488, 511, 592, 670
gravitomagnetic 341, 424, 437 mass 16, 332-4, 424
gravity ix, x, xii, 15, 38, 76, 78-9, 80, neutrino 299, 300
82, 94, 98, 133, 141-2, 261, 298-9, radiant 659
319, 330-6, 341, 346, 349, 351, spectral 659-60
361, 363-4, 372, 374, 378-9, 383, tube 288
385, 388-91, 394-8, 413, 415, 424- Frenet-Serret 1, 3, 50-3

690
 Index
Fresnel Gauthier, R 148
coefficient 117 geodesic
zones 70, 72, 76, 95, 97, 288, 292, relative acceleration 15, 17, 80, 434-5
329, 426-7, 429-33, 436-9, 440, geodetic (de Sitter) precession 231
442-4, 620 Gerber, P. 334
frequency Ghosh, S. et al 148
arrhythmia 328, 448, 463, 471 Ginzburg, V. 148
Betatron 195 glissando 489-90, 507, 602, 607
chirp 4, 9, 122, 357, 515, 622 gluons 288, 292-4
comb 498-9, 504, 509, 526-7, 551, 593, gradient refractive index (GRIN) lens 70-
598 1, 73-4, 426, 619
Compton xii, 45, 49, 98, 110, 151, gravitation tonality 591
153-7, 166, 210, 218, 230-1, 235-6, gravitational constant 18, 21, 34, 38, 43,
238, 240, 334, 357, 388-9, 432, 47, 82, 133, 225, 244, 316, 333, 335,
451, 601, 603 341, 359-60, 363-4, 369, 371, 378-86,
cut-off 47, 49, 91, 135, 219, 300, 378, 399, 401, 450, 522, 588, 636, 663
450, 452, 455, 474, 515, 535-6 gravitational redshift 371-2, 380-2, 445-6,
de Broglie 86-7, 90, 110-1, 161, 212, 470
366, 514, 529, 548, 586, 588 gravitational energy 300, 343, 368, 400,
definition and units of 4, 33, 45-7, 244, 403, 419-20, 452, 498, 504, 572, 596,
603, 635 675
difference 102-4, 108-9, 112-3, 115, gravitational field ix, xi-xii, 16, 34, 71,
329, 349, 369, 375-7, 447, 462-3, 76, 79-82, 160, 166, 261, 303-4, 329,
470-2, 487, 489, 498, 504,511, 514, 333-4, 338, 342, 361, 364-5, 367-8,
526-7, 561, 570 372, 374-8, 389-90, 401, 404, 413-4,
dilation x-xii, 14, 76, 78, 83, 93-4, 101, 419-24, 432-3, 437-8, 445, 471, 601,
108, 232, 328, 371-2, 419, 447, 537 605, 621
EM spectrum 45-6, 49, 123, 357-8, energy density 343, 502, 504-5, 507,
450, 503-4, 515-6, 532, 593 516, 522, 524-5, 555, 637
gravitation 357-8, 503, 532, 601 mass density 82, 337, 365, 368, 420,
Larmor precession 195 422-3, 436, 522, 534, 638
Planck 13, 45-7, 57, 133, 147, 235-6, nonlinear 419-23
357, 413, 601, 603 gravitational flux 101, 332-3, 339, 343,
resonant 35, 57-8, 92, 120, 462, 489, 368, 424, 432-3, 524
504, 511, 611 gravitational force ix, xiii, 15, 38, 76, 78-
Zitterbewegung 149, 151, 166, 205, 9, 80, 82, 94, 98, 133, 141-2, 261,
207, 210, 218, 220, 267 298-9, 319, 330-6, 341, 346, 349, 351,
Frolov, A. 416 361, 363-4, 372, 374, 378-9, 383, 385,
Fulling-Davies, Unruh effect 13, 121, 472 388-91, 94-8, 413, 415, 424-5, 432,
Funaro, D. 1 438, 447-8, 470, 484, 496, 498, 502,
585
G gravitational frequency
differential xiii, 369, 375-7, 419, 433,
g-factor 149, 205-6, 230 447, 452-3, 505, 514, 527-8, 561
Gabor Fourier spectral analysis 450-456
lens 70 redshift 380, 445-6
zone plate 473 spectrum 357-8, 450-6, 504, 602
Gaussian gravitational gamma 16, 33, 82, 160, 372-
beam 65, 67, 256 3, 381-2, 389, 413, 432, 446, 450,
curvature 52, 309, 418, 434-5, 440, 537, 574, 637
621, 627 gravitational lens 71, 75-6, 79
envelope 607 gravitational magnitude 372-3, 381-2,
filter 310 388-9, 445
Gauss’s law 342, 670 gravitational mass xii, 79, 132, 142-3,
Gauss’s law of gravity 368 253, 319, 329, 357, 363, 374, 378,
gauge symmetry 27, 250, 259, 298, 411, 434, 443, 453, 594
624

691
 Index
gravitational mass density 365, 368, 420- H
2, 638
gravitational parameter 330-1, 385 Haisch, B, Rueda, A., Puthoff, H. 124
gravitation permeability 359, 380, 385, Hall resistane 200, 246
401-2, 406 Hamiltonian 90, 133, 305-8, 630
gravitational potential 76-7, 80, 261, 305, Hamiltonian circuit 671
309, 331, 336, 353, 363-7, 369-72, Hamming code 671
375, 377, 401, 420, 434, 446-7, 450, Hasse diagram 671
470, 478, 496, 498-502, 504-6, 523-4, Heaston, R. 148
573, 617, 636 Heaviside, O.
normalized 364-5 EM field equations 15, 266
gravitational Poynting vector 526, 544, gravitation 334, 367
579 Hegel dialectic 135
gravitational time dilation xi, 14, 76, 78, Heim, B.
371-2, 419, 447, 537 electric charge 400
gravitational vector potential 367, 424, electron mass 400
507,574, 578, 582, 584, 591, 614, gravitational constant 399
631, 635 density action tensor 405
gravitational waves 332, 357-8, 414-5, Heisenberg, W.
509, 592 fine structure constant 229
gravitoelectromagnetism (GEM) 329, 334, uncertainty principle 250, 307
338, 340, 368, 424, 572-3, 581-2 (See helicity 1, 96, 149, 152, 247, 259, 263,
also cogravitation) 269, 273-4, 299-300, 302, 413-4
gravity Helmholtz, H.
and electromagnetism 26, 333, 335- resonator 91
344, 368, 404, 406 vacuum 160
cogravitation 233, 329, 334, 338, 340, vortex rings 299, 302
368, 424, 572-3, 581-2 Hestenes, D. 148, 193, 198, 232
force xii, 15, 38, 76, 78-9, 80, 82, 94, Hicks, W.M. 350
98, 133, 141-2, 261, 298-9, 319, Higgs, P.
330-6, 341, 346, 349, 351, 361, field x, 88
363-4, 372, 374, 378-9, 383, 385, mechanism 276
388-91, 394-8, 413, 415, 424-5, potential 416
432, 438, 447-8, 470, 484, 496, holonomy 252, 408
498, 585, 594 Holtzmüller, G. 334
frequency spectrum 357-8, 603 Hooke, R. 330, 349
frequency differential 329, 349, 369, Hopf link ix, xii, 50, 52, 148-50, 153,
375-7, 447, 462-3, 470-2, 487, 489, 155, 159, 223
498, 504, 514, 526-7 Hubble
Gauss’s law 342, 368, 660 constant 18, 300, 379-80
Newton’s law 330, 361, 378, 388 redshift 227, 397
optical theory of xii, 71, 497 Hughes, W. 396
variation with time 378-80 Humpty Dumpty 126
gravitons ix, xii, 76, 203, 357, 399, 406, Hunter , G. 1
408, 410, 413-8, 429-30, 432, 442, Hunter, J. 379
502, 553 Huygens-Fresnel diffraction 68
gravitomagnetic (See also cogravitation) Huygens
160, 233, 237-9, 329, 334, 338, 340, clock synchronization 457
368, 424, 571-3, 581-2 wavelets 235
Green, G. 374 hypercharge 276-7, 290, 298
group velocity 2, 4, 7-9, 11, 33, 35, 57, hypocycloid 271-3
65, 84, 87, 95, 109, 117, 119-20, 341,
416, 467, 487, 491, 556-7, 588, 597 I
gyromagnetic factor 205-6
gyromagnetic spin ratio 206-7, 230, 657 imaginary number 2, 19, 258, 260, 663,
gyroscope inertial mass, 253 668

692
 Index
impact inertial mass xii, 16, 38, 83, 87, 98, 121,
cross-section 300 124, 126, 132, 141-3, 232, 253, 329,
line 411-2 374, 378, 511, 557, 572, 579, 594,
parameter 75, 80 634, 644
impedance interference
acoustic cavity oscillator 92 grating 113, 487, 489, 492, 551
black hole 667 harmonic 352, 415
complex 135, 139, 263, 312 oscillator 350, 353, 440, 443, 464-5,
antenna 97, 236 473-7
cyclotron 199 Fresnel zone xiv, 70, 288, 292, 329,
dimensions 652 426-7, 429-33, 440, 442-4, 620
electromagnetic cavity oscillator 92 interference nodes xii, 60, 69, 76, 288,
electromagnetic oscillator 92 432-3, 440-1, 443, 471, 478, 601,
electron 7, 220, 228, 236 608, 621
filter 311 nodal lines 465, 477
mechanical 92 standing wave 350-1, 428, 463
mismatch 210, 351, 354, 677 wave/beam 353, 430, 440-1, 443, 490
Planck 8, 33, 667 wave patterns xii, 65, 68, 70, 98, 111-
radiation 5, 13, 236 3, 120, 158, 288-9, 293-4, 332,
ratio 7-8, 44, 245, 263, 677 413-4, 426-7, 432, 440, 443, 463,
Smith chart 24, 135, 139-40 473, 474-9, 485, 621
spacetime 235, 330, 378 wave phase 350, 355-6, 556, 594
triangle 140 zone 65, 289
vacuum (free space) 5, 33, 82, 96, inverse Barnett effect 486
220, 228, 241, 378, 400, 594, 597, inverse beta decay 296
637, 653 inverse Cherenkov effect 486
wave 5, 7-8, 652 inverse Doppler effect xi, 116-7, 122,
wave guide 8 128, 529, 577
index of refraction ix, 8, 14, 29, 33, 35, inverse Faraday effect 486
51, 57-60, 71, 75-6, 82, 84, 87, 117, inverse fine structure constant xii, 154,
133, 159-161, 372, 446, 507, 532, 574 166, 228, 232, 240, 247
complex 57-8, 509 inverse Kepler-Boukamp 146, 595-6, 617
graded 71, 117, 619 inverse Sagnac effect xi, 120, 486, 574,
negative 9, 71, 84, 116-7, 267, 507, 588
509, 533, 566, 597 inverse square law 332, 349, 353, 396-7
vacuum ix, 14, 29, 33, 35, 51, 58, 71, inversion 54, 134, 152, 493, 525-6, 532,
75-6, 82, 133, 160, 372, 446, 591 593, 606, 665, 670, 677
inductance 27, 87, 91-2, 140, 159, 160, isospin 277
162, 165, 230, 374, 644, 653, 666, isotopic charge 277
670 Ivanov, Y.
inerter 507-8 standing wave transformations xi, 98,
inertia x-xii, 14, 16, 38, 79, 82-4, 87-8, 101, 104-110
98, 116-7, 121-2, 124, 126, 140-1, gravitation 80, 328-9, 375, 447, 463,
142-3, 167, 232, 253, 329, 334, 374- 470-2
5, 378, 380, 435, 492, 507-8, 511, Ivanenko process 414
526-8, 530-1, 556-7, 570-3, 575, 579,
586, 594, 597, 602, 614, 634, 644 J
gyroscopic 253
origin of 83 Jefimenko, O.
melodic 592 co-gravitation 329, 338-340, 367
moment 37, 571, 589, 629 electrokinetic field 25
permeability 343 gravitational model 34, 329, 334, 338-
inertial damper 121, 507-8 344, 367-8, 374, 404, 420, 422-3
inertial reference frame 39, 40, 78, 93, induced electrokinetic force 25
98, 101, 103, 120-1, 162, 231-2, 234, retarded potentials 98, 363
328, 332, 372, 463, 477, 614, 663 Jennison, R.C. x, 83-4, 116, 148, 231, 375
Jones vector 10

693
 Index

K Levi-Civita,
connection 52, 276
Kaluza-Klein 16, 166, 239, 250, 404-5, effect x, 220, 222, 224
624, 671 levitation 319, 322, 324-7, 383-5, 483-5,
Kanarev, Ph. M. 148 493, 500, 526, 532, 551, 553, 555,
Kerr effect 9, 35, 55, 111, 113, 142, 551 557-8, 570-1, 576
Kepler-Bouwkamp constant 146, 617 Lie group 40, 260, 267, 271, 298, 613
Kepler’s laws of motion 38, 330, 345-8, Liénard-Wiechart potential functions 95
374 light,
Kepler’s triangle 609 confinement 1, 35-6, 58, 83, 620
kinetic energy 17, 25, 37, 79, 83, 90, 91, curvature x, 1-4, 43, 50-2, 76, 79, 80,
94, 117, 129, 132, 159, 162, 164, 166, 82
210, 219, 231, 234, 253, 289-90, 296, deflection of xi-xii, 76-9, 80-1, 101,
300, 305-8, 329, 362, 364, 482, 496, 328, 441, 532, 592-3
502, 507, 509, 555, 561, 572, 574, diffraction 65-70, 72, 111-2, 160, 291,
576, 580, 601, 605, 614, 666 440-3
kink soliton 1, 14, 29, 31, 269 reflection 35, 60-5, 68-70, 72, 83-4,
Klyuschin, J. 190, 226-7 112-2, 413, 415, 432, 442-4, 512,
Korteweg-de Vries equation 2, 35 514, 551, 620
Kristoffen, B. 366 speed of ix-xi, 1-2, 5, 9, 11, 13, 19, 29,
Krizek, M. and Somer, L. 379 33, 35, 47, 76, 78-9, 93, 95-6, 101-
Krogh, K. 76, 79, 328, 364-6, 368, 446-7 2, 105, 108-9, 128, 215, 218-9,
Kuramoto model 457, 459 224, 226, 228, 237, 239, 289, 316,
328-9, 369, 371-2, 378-9, 391, 407,
L 422, 432, 441, 445-7, 463, 511,
515, 573, 577, 588, 593, 672
Lagrange (libration) points 348, 425, 498- torsion 1-4, 15, 17, 34, 38, 43, 50-1,
9 223, 226, 244, 404, 406, 416-8, 627
Lagrangian 83, 90, 129, 143, 305-6, 343, wave 1-16, 29, 45-9, 54, 57, 60-75,
361, 377-8, 528-9, 631, 676 250, 362
LaFreniere, G. Lissajous 126, 129, 263, 449, 467, 473-4
gluon fields 288 loop quantum gravity (LQG) 255, 267,
neutron model 290 310, 407-8, 410
standing wave transformation xi, 101- longitudinal mass 98
2, 104-110 longitudinal wave xii, 5-7, 160, 276, 353,
wave model 78, 83, 93, 101, 104, 328 555
Lahav, O. and Calder, L. 361 Lorentz, H.A. 98, 396
Lamb shift 13 Lorentz boost 127, 308
Lambdoma matrix 610 Lorentz contraction xi- xii, 17, 78, 83, 87-
Larmor precession 207, 231, 233 8, 90, 93, 101-3, 105, 108, 160-1,
Landé g-factor 206 210-1, 215, 217, 239, 278, 328, 349,
Laplace, P. 372, 424, 432, 437-8, 449, 479, 481,
equation 261, 309, 368 577, 598, 600, 614
force law 361 Lorentz Doppler shift xi, 83, 88, 93, 101,
gravitional potential 361, 363, 365 372 104, 108-10, 119, 128, 166, 215-7,
operator 310, 368 349, 449, 488, 529-32, 545-7, 551,
transforms 311-4 555-6, 561, 577, 590, 591
equilibrium surfaces 310-1 Lorentz factor 87, 93, 102-3, 105-6, 108,
Laplacian 128, 160, 163-4, 166, 211, 215, 230,
operator 219, 258-60, 353, 365, 368-9, 232, 278, 372, 385, 468-9, 483
428 Lorentz force 82, 121, 207, 224, 323, 341,
wavefront curvature 309 346, 656
Leahy, A.H. 350 Lorentz frame 121, 162, 332, 435
Leibnitz, G. 17, 134 Lorentz group 250, 267
leptons 239, 247-9, 258, 277, 288 Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformations xi, 39-
Lense-Thirring precession 233, 334, 572 40, 93-4, 98, 102, 104-10, 141, 225,
Leuchs, G. 15 239, 260, 305, 614

694
 Index
Lorentz invariance 13, 121, 315, 334, mass
515, 573 active 93-4, 369, 371, 462, 498, 504,
Lorentz-invariant theory of gravity (LITG) 509, 515, 532-3, 572
334 complex 139, 141
Lorentz tensor 26, 401 deficit angle 131, 164, 235
Lorenz gauge 27, 260 energy 34, 93, 126, 133, 143, 149, 165-
Lucas, C. 148, 227, 361, 397-8 6, 219, 234, 279-84, 301, 303-4,
Lunar Laser Ranging tests 379 353, 378, 391, 452, 472,507
Luneberg lens 70, 73, 426 gravitational xiii, 79, 132, 142-3, 253,
319, 329, 357, 363, 374, 378, 434,
M 443, 453, 594
inertial xii, 16, 38, 83, 87, 98, 121,
MacGregor, M. 148, 201, 283 124, 126, 132, 141-3, 232, 253,
Macken, J. 34, 83-4, 148, 158, 169, 183-4, 329, 374, 378, 511, 557, 572, 579,
187, 195, 236, 372, 381-2, 388-9, 391, 594, 634, 644
394, 402, 415 passive 369, 462, 498, 504, 509, 515-
magnetic charge 158, 646 16, 532, 572
magnetic field strength (intensity) 2-3, 6- positive 15, 23-4, 29, 34, 132, 140,
8, 10, 38, 82, 145, 322, 338-9, 507, 142, 146, 419, 507, 574, 588-90,
585, 648 596-8, 617, 622, 675
magnetic flux lines 16-7, 51, 76, 79, 92, reactive 94
158, 160, 220, 224, 240, 322-4, 339- negative ix, 14-5, 19-20, 24, 29, 34,
40, 441, 488, 511, 549, 585, 588, 592, 128, 132-3, 135-6, 143-4, 146,
648-9 419, 421, 507, 526, 532, 571, 574-
magnetic flux density 3, 6, 17, 51, 76, 92, 6, 588-90, 594, 596, 597-8
220, 224, 322-3, 339, 441, 488, 511, scaling 359
549, 585, 588, 649 master oscillator 349, 457, 462
magnetic flux quantum (fluxoid) 16, 191 matter wave xi, 70-1, 78, 84, 88, 93, 101,
magnetic moment 15, 145, 149, 151-3, 109, 113, 116, 120-1, 124, 128-9, 130,
159, 205-7, 223-4, 240, 278, 280, 284, 141, 160, 166, 210,
300, 303, 322, 571, 646 305-6, 328, 349, 457, 479, 484, 529-
magnetic permeability 8, 28, 31, 33-4, 59, 30, 555, 557, 561, 588
76, 78, 92, 117, 160, 240, 319, 322, Maxwell, J.C.
328, 343, 441, 507, 529, 581, 650 displacement current 25, 27
magnetomotive force (MMF) 158-9, 649 equations 15, 20, 25, 33, 76, 226, 260,
magnetophoresis 319, 322 266, 404-5, 511, 623-4
magnetostatic field xi, 158, 167, 261, 352, gravitation 333, 348
396, 483, 594 Mead, C. A. 38, 83, 126
magnetostatic field energy x, xii, 43, 154, Merkaba 668
159, 160, 163, 167, 230-1, 244, 261, Meissner effect 264, 322, 484
391, 396, 483, 594, 649 metamaterial 4, 5, 8, 11, 73, 84, 111, 116-
magnetostatic pressure 160, 167, 650 7, 123, 128, 131, 159, 267, 478, 529,
manifold 531, 555, 588, 591-4, 597-8
affine 18 Metatron cube 667-8
base 1, 80, 250, 402, 405-6, 663, 665, metric
667, 671 coefficients 315, 381
Calibi-Yau 407 EM wave interference 18, 414, 419,
catastrophe 675 427, 592
differentiable 52 Minkowski 250, 315, 402, 408
Riemann 254, 276, 316, 333, 435 Riemann 276, 405-6, 434
spacetime 16, 19, 50, 77, 93, 250, 254, spacetime xii, 160, 276, 401-4, 406,
401, 429, 592 447
supergravity 408 tensor 79, 315-6, 328, 364, 372, 399,
tangent space 1, 76-7, 250, 369, 371, 401-5, 408, 419, 427, 434
406, 663, 665 Meyl, K. 299-300
torus 148, 223 Michaud, A. 173
Martins, A. and Pinheiro, M. 98 Midy, P. 380

695
 Index
Mikheyev-Smironov-Wolfenstein (MSW) muon (mu-meson) 49, 278, 282-3, 285,
effect 300 288
Minkowski spacetime 40, 76, 93, 121, muonium 283
127, 250, 310, 315, 371, 402, 408,
414, 472, 601 N
Möbius 141, 677
mode Nambu, Y. 202
cut-off 452, 455, 535-6, 542 N-body gravitation 347-8
density 121, 592, 597 n-gon 229, 271, 387, 596, 598, 605, 621
electromagnetic 7, 24, 35, 60, 91-2, 453 negative curvature xv, 1, 19-20, 52, 146-
even-odd 452-3, 462, 503, 511 7, 353, 420, 434, 598, 621, 666
locking 328, 391, 457, 462, 555-6, 574 negative frequency 48, 482, 497-8, 502-9
whispering gallery 507-8, 529, 531, negative energy 13, 16, 20-1,34, 48, 111,
551-2, 574, 588, 598, 619-20 122, 132, 146, 242, 260, 267, 353,
modulation 379, 416, 419-20, 496, 502, 506-8,
amplitude (AM) 111, 115, 497-8, 504, 526, 532, 592-3, 595, 597-8, 617, 621
519, 600 negative index metamaterial (NIM) 123,
anharmonic 462 128, 131, 526, 529, 532, 574, 577,
carrier 115 622
cross 525 negative mass ix, 14-5, 19-20, 24, 29, 34,
envelope 8, 115, 118, 119, 508 128, 132-3, 135-6, 143-4, 146, 353,
frequency (FM) 115, 462, 497, 504, 362, 419, 421, 507, 526, 532, 571,
511, 515, 522, 555, 557 574-7, 588-9, 590, 594, 596-8
harmonic 518 nephroid (epicycloid) 271
phase (PM) 9, 55, 115, 122, 487, 497- neutrino
8, 504, 551 absorption 296-7
pitch 602, 607, 615 anti 296, 299-300
polarization 599 electron 296-7, 299-301, 303
refractive index 113 flux 299-300
quadrature (QAM) 497-8 muon 299-301, 303
spectral energy density xiii, 511 properties of 301, 303
standing wave 84, 87, 111, 113, 118, spin flip 304
119, 486, 490, 555-6 tau 299, 301, 303
Möller scattering 209 neutron 22, 290, 243, 295, 296-7, 380, 676
Moiré Newton’s laws
interference fringe pattern 70, 332, gravitation 142, 227, 330-4, 361
427-8 first law x, 110, 162
wavefront 426-8 second law 83, 110, 124, 142, 374
momentum third law 38, 110, 253
angular ix, x, 1, 15-8, 29, 34, 37, 39, Noether, E. 39, 666
42, 47, 50, 132, 149, 151, 166, 205- Nyambuya, G. 368
7, 220, 228, 239, 243, 246-7, 250,
255-7, 267, 284, 360, 378, 380, O
410, 489, 507, 558, 583, 593, 623,
629, 663 octonions 266, 665, 668, 672, 697
Oldershaw, R. 34, 360
canonical 26, 240, 656
Ortho-positronium 279
energy-momentum 8, 29, 221, 316,
oscillator,
401-2, 414, 507
acoustic 91-2
flux 317, 402
arrays 482
linear 17, 28, 39, 132, 142, 223, 253,
cavity 84, 91-2, 487-92, 501
255, 299, 300, 302, 353, 414, 507-
compromise frequency 460-2, 470
8, 548, 593, 629
coupling 360, 457-9, 460, 463, 471,
monad 19, 20, 22, 146, 610
498, 605
monadnock 546
electromagnetic 91-2, 487-92, 501
Mössbauer effect 446, 463, 470-1
electromagnetic cavity 91-2
Mossotti, O. 319-20, 396

696
 Index
oscillator (cont) 343, 382-4, 396, 398, 441, 505, 507,
interference xii, 350-1, 352-3, 355-6, 581, 597, 651
409, 413-5, 426-8, 442, 462-7, 473- Petit, J.P. 143, 380
9 phase
mass 124, 141, 329, 415, 442, 444, accumulation 329, 391
450-1, 459, 461-3, 470, 496, 605 alignment 17, 19, 29, 133, 144, 151,
master 349, 457, 462 246, 385, 391, 465
mechanical 92 angle 88, 90-7, 114, 125, 129, 210,
phase difference 128, 329, 350, 457, 251, 263, 626
460-1, 465, 467-9, 473, 487, 489 coherence 458, 605
phase-lock 84, 470, 459 conjugation 111-3, 117, 124-5, 417
slave 349, 457, 462, 489-90 conjugate mirror (PCM) 60-1, 64-5,
synchronization 457-60, 462, 474, 522 67, 86, 111, 116, 118-120
conjugate phased array 122, 485-93,
P 501, 532, 555, 558, 561, 591, 594
conjugate phasor 114, 124-5, 263-4
Pachner move 440 conjugate wave (PCW) 111, 113
pair production and annihilation ix- x, displacement 84, 87, 323, 375, 448,
148, 208, 220 463, 473
pair production, E & H relationship 7, 97-7
cross-section 208 geometric 18, 249-252
wave phasor diagram 210-1 interference 350, 352, 355-6
parametric amplifier 113, 121, 126, 128, lag 7, 96-7, 321, 448, 487
486, 488-90, 532, 551, 561 lock 22, 118, 166, 246, 289, 555, 561,
parametric pumping 113, 117, 122, 555, 570, 605
561 locking boundary 232
Para-positronium 279 modulation (PM) 35, 115
partial standing waves 88, 210, 214, 352, phase-locked resonator 83-88, 93, 98,
354, 486-7, 557 111, 116, 118-120, 122, 126-7,
particle types 248 131, 375, 570
Pascal’s triangle 599 quadrature 5, 22, 84, 91, 97, 289, 293,
passive mass 369, 462, 498, 504, 509, 467
515-6, 532, 572 rotation 114, 125, 259, 289, 414, 416,
Pauli, W. 426
exclusion principle 247 shift 117, 126, 128-9, 329, 365, 427,
fine structure 229 448-9, 463, 465-9, 555, 587, 593-4,
graviton 404 675
spin matrices 267 space 307-8, 624, 676
Penrose, R synchronization 351, 448, 458-9
Bronstein-Penrose cube 623, 672 velocity 2, 4, 7-10, 33, 35, 57, 65, 78,
fine structure constant 229 82-4, 87, 95, 103, 108, 117, 141,
twistor theory 261 328, 413, 487
period phasors 19-20, 88, 90, 111, 114, 124-6,
coasting x 129, 210-1, 217, 263-4, 496
fundamental 454 Phi ratios 48, 228-9, 360, 607, 610, 618,
orbital 278, 331, 345, 347, 374, 611 663
pulsation 104, 349, 352, 447, 517, 519, photon ix, x, xii, 1-3, 12-14, 16, 18, 29,
619 32, 35, 37-8, 50-1, 58, 60, 76, 78-9,
rotation 155, 158 83-4, 87-8, 98, 111, 148-52, 166, 208,
storage 5, 162 210-11, 220-1, 222-224, 237, 263,
dimension 635 299, 304, 323, 357, 400, 407, 409,
permeability, magnetic 8, 28, 31, 33-4, 413-18, 429-30, 432, 442, 445-7, 470,
59, 76, 78, 92, 117, 160, 240, 319, 502, 515, 525, 561, 589, 591, 599,
322, 328, 343, 441, 505, 507, 581, 600
597, 650 physical (quantum) vacuum ix-xiv, 1, 5, 7,
permittivity, electric xii, 33, 56, 59, 76, 9, 13-16, 18-35, 37, 45-7,49, 51, 56-8,
78, 92, 117, 160, 225, 240, 305, 328, 71, 76, 78-83, 94, 96-7, 101, 111, 121,

697
 Index
physical quantum vacuum (cont) poloidal spin x, 240, 299
132-36, 141, 146-7, 155, 158, 160, Poincaré,
166, 168, 210, 224, 235, 237, 241, disc 621
276, 289, 299, 317, 319, 323, 328-9, gravitation 334, 348
353, 357-65, 369, 371-4, 378-9, 381- group 40, 298
5, 389, 391-3, 396, 398, 402, 404-09, sphere 1, 9, 12, 250, 252
411, 413, 416, 419-23, 429-32, 435-7, transformations 39
441-2, 446, 452-3, 462, 502, 509, 571, positronium 279, 288
592-9, 600, 603, 637, 653, 673,675-7 positrons ix-x, 19, 21, 148, 211, 221-22,
pilot wave 94, 217 247, 249, 278, 288-9, 290, 295-6,
pion (pi meson) 278, 280-1, 284, 286, 298-9, 357
290, 300 potential energy x, 17-8, 26, 39, 79, 84,
Planck 90-1, 129, 142, 149, 210, 226,
aether ix, 13-4, 25, 34, 132, 138, 141, 231, 260, 289-90, 307, 308, 318-9
319, 329, 419-20 329, 346, 364, 375, 470, 472, 479,
constant, 2, 16-8, 37, 39, 42, 44, 47, 482, 496, 502, 509, 533, 573-4, 576,
79-80, 83, 87, 110, 141, 151, 162, 580, 605, 614, 645, 649
201, 208, 215, 228, 244-5, 247, Pound, Rebka, Snider experiment 446,
260, 307, 380, 388, 400, 416, 450, 470-1
623, 663, 672 power
reduced constant 2, 18, 21, 37, 42, 47, apparent (real) 654
201, 228, 239, 243, 388, 400 average 515, 518
charge 30, 137, 170, 202, 245, 605 blackbody 552
dipole(s) ix, 1, 14, 16-9, 21, 23, 29, 32, circulating 158, 184, 236
34-7, 39, 57, 121, 132-3, 135, 137, definition and units of, 110, 158, 519,
141, 144-7, 151, 155, 158-9, 166, 633
202, 235, 246, 276, 289, 294, 299- electrical 158-9
304, 362, 385, 391, 419-21, frequencies 57
507,571, 592-4, 597-8, 600, 676 law 347
energy ix, 18, 29, 42, 79, 132-3, 147, luminous 661
299, 353, 380, 594 peak 517
force 13, 42, 147, 201, 298, 379, 391, Planck 202
402 radiant 659
frequency 13, 45-7, 49, 57, 133, 147, radiated 236, 518, 547,552, 554, 587,
201, 235-6, 357, 413, 432, 601, 603 659
impedance 8, 33, 44, 147, 677 reactive (true) 654
length 3, 13-4, 30, 34, 132-3, 146-7, spectrum 518-9
201, 235, 300, 380, 389, 391, 507, loss 59
593, 598, 617 series 20, 312, 320, 378, 663
mass xiii, 7, 13-21, 29, 30-2, 35, 37, spectral 660
47, 98, 132-3, 135-8, 144, 146-7, Poynting vector 5, 8, 14, 29, 65, 79, 82,
155, 235, 303, 317, 353, 362, 379, 94, 96-7, 117, 145, 329, 344, 426,
385, 407, 419, 424, 450-1, 571, 428, 432, 456, 487, 496, 502, 505,
592-4,597, 617, 677 509, 524, 551, 575-6, 579, 605, 631,
time 22, 41, 132, 147, 334, 379-80, 656
389 precession
plane waves 1, 5, 7, 35, 71, 293, 473, 594 charge-to-mass xii, 207
polarizability 13, 54, 56, 76, 318, 321, de Sitter (geodetic) 231, 195
441 electric charge 16, 34, 41, 150, 152-4,
polarization, 158, 168, 207, 223 230, 234, 238-9,
nonlinear 320, 389, 440, 462, 485, 246-7, 272,289, 290, 393,405, 593,
509, 593, 597 624, 669, 671-2
polaritons 117, 141, 207, 411, 588 electron spin 16, 32, 141, 150, 152-4,
polarons 276 158, 168, 193, 207, 223, 230, 238-
poloidal (anapole) magnetic field 158, 9, 246-7, 272, 283, 289-90, 393,
205, 240 405, 593, 624, 669, 671-2
poloidal radius 152, 188

698
 Index
precession (cont) flavor 273, 295
fine structure constant xii, 154, 204, mass 272-3, 277, 290, 295
207, 246-7, 393 spin 277, 289, 293-4
gravitomagnetic 195, 231 quaternions 265-7, 671
gyromagnetic spin 154, 179, 207, 247 quintessence xv, 34, 361, 399-400
gyroscopic 253, 255
Lamor 195, 207, 231 R
Lense-Thirring 233, 334, 561
orbital 133, 140-1, 164, 168, 193, 242, radiation
252, 324 blackbody 45, 432-3, 451, 542
perihelion advance 227, 334 Cherenkov 8, 149, 299
quadrapole 310 dipole ix, 88, 91, 95-7, 99-100
retrograde 391, 231-2, 391 force 86-7, 98, 119, 389, 489-90, 526,
spin 239-40, 246-7, 289, 299, 302-3 529, 551, 553, 561
Thomas-Wigner 154, 194, 207, 231-2, impedance 13
252 pressure 8, 82-4, 110, 116, 119-120,
proper acceleration 127, 472 124, 126, 323, 329, 375, 436, 483,
proper frequency 111, 614 487, 541, 550-51, 645-6
proper length 107, 109, 234, 371-3, 381, resistance 5, 97, 239, 512, 677
445-6, 614,625 synchrotron 149
proper Lorentz transformations 40 zero-point 121, 123
proper mass 16, 381, 614, 625 Raman scattering 111, 443-4
proper time 16, 18, 93, 107, 109, 127, rapidity xii, 93, 127-8
160, 166, 371-3, 381, 391, 445-7, 614, Rayleigh criterion 291
625 Rayleigh-Wood zone plate 70
proton 288, 290, 292, 295-7, 299, 384 redshift
pump beams 69, 112-3, 116, 124, 126, cosmological (stellar) 361, 382
128, 486-7, 490, 530, 551, 556, 561, Doppler 108-9, 215-6, 489
597 gravitational 371-2, 380-2, 445-6, 470
pump wave x, 113, 117-21, 130 redshift
push-pull cavity xi, 85, 89, 119, 124, 501 Hubble 227
Puthoff, H. 76, 78, 121, 133, 224, 328, Tift 397
378, 441 reflection coefficient 126, 352
Pythagoras theorem 591, 599 refractive index ix, x, xii, 4, 9, 16-7, 35,
Pythagorean harmonic intervals 134, 349, 54, 56, 65, 67-8, 70-1, 73-4, 76, 78-9,
426, 601, 607-11, 613-4 82, 94, 113, 117, 131, 133, 20, 224,
256, 328-9, 357, 359, 369, 372-3, 382,
Q 407, 413, 420-1, 426, 430-3, 441, 451,
456, 497, 503, 509, 590, 592, 599,
quantum chromodynamics theory (QCD) 619, 622, 637
275, 288, 295 resonance 9, 16, 35, 57, 59, 65, 117, 122,
quantum electrodynamics (QED) 166, 160, 166, 218, 228, 235, 237, 288,
208-9, 260, 407, 624, 672 300, 321, 347, 379, 389, 391, 393,
diagrams 209 408-9, 413-5, 426, 482, 551-2, 555,
quantum gravity 255, 267, 310, 407-12, 559, 561,601-2, 604, 607-8, 611, 620
427-28, 430-1, 433, 440, 623-4, 672 resonator x-xii, 8, 16, 35, 65, 71, 83-4,
quantum field ix-x, 15, 76, 400, 407-8, 87-9, 91-2, 95, 98, 103, 110-1, 113,
411, 414, 623-4, 672 116-22, 124, 126-8, 131-2, 141, 147,
quark 166, 210, 213, 329, 352, 465-7, 479,
anti- 18, 270-1, 275, 288, 295, 298, 481, 484-6, 495, 497-8, 501, 504,
669 507-8, 512, 514, 527-9, 529-31, 551,
charge 239, 247, 256-7, 270-2, 274, 555, 559-61, 570, 588, 590, 593, 596,
277, 289-90, 295-7, 407, 669 598, 620
color 256-7, 275, 277, 288-9, 295, 298 rest mass x, 16, 21, 29, 40, 78-9, 83-9,
confinement 288 116,140-1, 148-9, 154, 166, 220,223, 234,
decay 273 240, 248, 254, 296, 364, 366, 375, 379,
generation 272-4 381,393, 400, 419, 450, 487, 511,557, 614

699
 Index
rest mass energy 126, 149, 166, 219, 234, Soret zone plate 70, 72
391, 450, 507 spacetime
ribbon, twist xii, 32, 148, 150, 256-7, 275, impedance 235, 330, 378
289 interval 16, 39-40, 83, 116, 124, 167,
Ricci curvature 276, 316-7, 401, 406, 251, 316, 403, 441, 448
434-6, 440 metric xii, 18, 51-2, 79, 161, 251, 255,
Riemann curvature 276, 316, 402-3, 406, 277, 308, 316-7, 329, 365, 373,
434-5 381-2, 290, 400, 402-7, 409, 415,
Riemann manifold (metric) 254, 276, 316, 420, 422, 428, 435-6, 448, 505,
400, 435, 440 592, 601, 607
relativity stiffness 378
discrete (DSR) 251 Spears, M. 38, 375, 384-6
general (GR) xii-xiii, 9, 76, 78, 166, special relativity (SR) 94, 98, 260, 332,
316, 328, 361, 372, 378, 401, 441, 372, 614, 624, 672
445, 588, 623-1, 671-2 spectral energy density xii, xiii, 24, 48,
special (SR) 93, 98, 162, 166, 260, 121, 488, 496, 523, 525-8, 532, 536,
332, 372, 614, 624, 671-2 594, 598-9, 659
Rindler frame acceleration 93, 121, 470 speed of light ix-xi, 1-11, 14-6, 19, 29, 33-
Rivas, M. 148 35, 38, 47, 51, 76, 78-9, 82, 93, 95-6,
rotating reference frame 38, 233-4, 437 101, 128, 133, 146, 149, 160, 212,
Roxburgh, I. 379 215, 218-9, 224, 226, 228, 239, 289,
299, 302, 316, 328-9, 364, 369, 371-2,
S 375, 378-9, 388, 391, 394, 398, 401,
407, 422, 432, 441, 445-8, 462-3, 467,
Saari, D. 348 470, 511, 522, 524, 529, 573, 588,
saccade 544 592-3, 597, 663, 672
Sagnac effect, 120 spherical rotations 251
inverse xi, 120, 486, 574, 588 spin
Sakharov 133, 378 of bosons 1, 2, 4, 149, 210, 277, 413
Sanchez-Soto, L. 15 connections 590
scalar dimensions of 1, 18, 31, 37, 39, 47,
curvature 82, 317-8, 402, 407, 435 388, 629
potential field 14-6, 18, 25-8, 43, 76, glass 15
78-9, 82, 95, 98, 126, 245, 267, 306, Hall resistance 200, 246
310, 320, 334-5, 337, 341, 354, 364-9, of electron 149, 151-6, 168, 171-2, 277
405-6, 414, 421, 432-3, 512, 574-6, of graviton 277, 404, 408, 413, 415-8
578, 580-1, 590, 614, 617, 636 of leptons 277
Scharnhorst effect 13 of neutrinos 277, 299, 301-4
Schrödinger wave equation 37, 353 of photon 1-4, 223, 277
Schwarzschild radius 18, 80-2, 133, 146, of quarks 256, 274-5, 277
148, 193, 235, 332, 360, 381, 454, poloidal xii, xii, 149, 151-3, 155, 240
677 networks 15, 122, 255-6, 261, 408,
Schwinger 410-12, 598-9, 600
critical field intensity 150, 223, 324 toplogical 15, 52
correction 161, 231 toroidal x, 149-159, 168, 171-3, 205,
Shepard tones 511, 526-7, 603, 607 240, 299, 389
Shilling, O. 186, 189 precession xi-xii, 16, 34, 154, 205,
Shipov, G. 254 207, 227, 230-32, 235, 239-40,
Shulgin, V. 320 246-7, 253, 255, 334, 347, 361,
sine-Gordon 2 391, 400, 405, 437, 572, 593, 596,
skyrmions 271, 583 605, 624, 663, 669, 671-2
slave oscillator 349, 457, 462, 489-90 spin angular momentum ix-x, 1, 5-6, 18,
Smith chart 135, 139-41, 677 29, 34, 37, 39, 42, 47, 51, 132, 149,
soliton(s) ix, 1-2, 9, 13-5, 29, 31-2, 35-6, 151, 166, 205-7, 220, 228, 239, 243,
58, 84, 98, 257, 270, 290, 412-3, 486- 246-7, 250, 255-6, 267, 284, 360, 378,
7, 592-3 410, 507, 558, 593 619, 629
Sommerfeld 229

700
 Index
spin wave ix, xiii, 2, 19, 21, 23, 31, 35-6, chiral 10, 15, 117, 227, 247, 271, 302,
147, 151, 156, 159, 238, 246-7, 317, 304, 412, 526, 597
362, 389, 391, 431, 575-8, 588, 592 conformal scale 360
spinors x, 13, 84, 135, 148, 153, 267-8, dual 573-5, 666
410 gauge 27, 250, 259, 624
spira mirabilis field 2, 19, 21, 23, 31, 35-6, global 624
147, 151, 156, 159, 238, 246-7, 317, groups 250, 260, 263, 295, 298, 380,
362, 389, 391, 432, 495, 507-8, 575, 666-7, 676
588, 621 inversion 54
standing wave local 258, 263
boundary effects 351-2 non-Abelian 250
moving contracted xi, 86, 90, 93-4, parity (P) 290
102, 111, 118-9, 128, 130, 166, space-time 39-40
210, 212-3, 466, 485, 487-93, 557, transformations 39, 210, 247, 258-9,
570, 614 268, 463, 624, 666
interactions x-xii, 83, 90, 306 synthesized Lorentz-Doppler 485-6, 488-
interference 98, 288, 350-1, 428, 463 9, 491-4, 496-9, 530, 555, 560-1, 591
levitation 483-5 synthesized matter wave xi, 113, 116,
mode-locking 328 120-1, 124-5, 484, 492-3, 498, 530,
partial 88, 210, 214, 352, 354, 547 561
ratio (SWR) 102, 105, 117, 315, 352
resonator 16, 65, 83-4, 86, 88, 90, 103, T
110, 118-20, 17-8, 131, 141, 147,
166, 210, 213, 479 Taylor series expansion 53, 111
system acceleration 86, 470, 475-6 tangent space (manifold) 1, 50, 52, 76-7,
transformations xiii, 90, 101-2, 104, 250-2, 369, 371, 382, 406, 430-3,
108-10 505-6, 510, 624, 663, 665
Sternglass, E. 18-9, 22, 278, 284-7, 290, tangent vector 1, 17, 50, 52, 250, 316,
299, 359, 380 412, 435
stiffness 34, 122, 126, 146 tauon (t-meson) 49, 278, 287-8
Storti, R. 76, 300, 369, 416, 429, 441, tensors
451-6, 462, 515, 524, 594 contravariant 26, 315-6
strain amplitude (resonance ratio) 218, covariant 26, 52, 315, 523, 573
234-5, 347, 389, 391 curvature 52, 80, 276, 316, 402-3, 434-
strain xiii, 56, 126, 234, 239, 261, 315-6, 5
389, 391, 426, 484, 492, 498, 526-7, Kronecker 312, 315
530, 557, 593 metric 79, 276, 315-6, 328, 364, 399,
stress xii, 17, 29, 126, 239, 261, 315-7, 401, 427, 447
401-4, 406, 422, 429, 435, 472, 484, Ricci 276, 316-7, 401, 406, 434-6, 440
492, 498, 507, 527, 530, 557, 633 Riemann 80, 276, 316, 401-3, 405-6,
string theory 148, 166, 250, 407-8, 410, 434-5
414, 624 Weyl 276, 316, 434-6, 440
strong force 275, 288, 290, 298-9, 406 Tesla, N. 134, 239, 349, 649
supersymmetry, tesseract graph 667, 671
theory 210 tetrachord base 457, 609
transformations 210 tetrad 1-3, 146, 368, 401-2, 406
surreal 258, 675 Tewari, P. 14, 148
susceptibility 35, 53-5, 111, 322, 485, 651 Thomas, L.H. 231
symmetry Thomas-Wigner precession 154, 194,
Abelian 250 207, 232-3, 252
action-reaction 142, 477 Thomson, J.J. 234
breaking xiv, 20,35, 122, 132, 142, Thomson, W. (Lord Kelvin) 349
162, 239, 259, 264, 298, 409, 411, Tipler, F. 365
416, 465, 477, 624, 675 Tisserand, F. 334
charge (C) 249, 290, 668, 670 topological charge x, xii, 16-7, 32, 37,
charge parity (CP) 290, 299 39, 41, 52, 220, 239-40, 242, 246,

701
 Index
topological charge (cont) index of refraction x, xi, 4, 14, 16-7,
249, 256, 258, 269-72, 274, 276, 289, 29, 33, 35, 51, 57-8, 71, 75-6, 78-9,
626, 666 81-2, 94, 132, 160, 220, 224, 328-
toroidal spin x, 149-156, 158, 168, 171-2, 9, 359, 369, 372-3, 381, 407, 413,
205, 240, 299, 389 420-1, 426, 429, 431-3, 441,444,
torsion x, 1-4, 13, 15, 17, 24, 29, 34, 38, 446, 451, 456, 503, 509, 590, 592,
43, 50-1, 52, 220, 223, 226, 239, 244, 599, 637
250, 273, 276, 339, 342, 391, 401, vector potential ix, xi, xiii, 4, 14-7, 25-6,
404-6, 416-8, 482, 507-8, 574-5, 578, 27-8, 32, 34-5, 37-8, 43, 58, 71, 76-9,
580, 588, 593, 597, 617, 627, 666 81-3, 94-5, 98, 124, 126, 159, 162,
torus 239, 240, 244, 259-60, 266, 305, 329,
curvature 52 333-4, 340, 353, 365-9, 372-3, 381,
Euler characteristic 52, 199 391, 405, 407, 424, 431-3, 456, 503,
horn 50, 52, 150 507, 509, 526, 574, 578, 582, 584,
manifold 148 590-2, 599, 614, 631, 655, 670
of revolution xi, 50, 150-3, 155, 223 velocity
ring 148, 150, 299 escape 160, 166, 331, 371-2, 507, 513,
spindle 52, 150, 189 533
tonnetz 606, 613 group 2, 4, 7-9, 11, 33, 35, 37, 57, 65,
winding trajectory 611 82, 84, 87, 95, 103, 105, 108-9,
tractor/repulsor beam 8, 486-7, 489-90, 329, 341, 416, 448, 466-7, 483,
493-4, 558 487, 491, 556, 577, 588, 597
transverse electric (TE) 8, 60, 91, 652 phase 2, 4, 7-9, 11, 33, 35, 57, 78, 82-
transverse electromagnetic (TEM) 7-8, 4, 87, 95-6, 103, 105, 108-9, 117,
60, 91 141, 328, 413, 449, 466-7, 470,
transverse magnetic (TM) 8, 60, 91, 300, 484-7, 489-93, 511, 577, 594, 597
652 ratio xi, 44, 82, 87, 102,108,
transverse waves 103, 160, 226, 555 119,128,160,163-5, 215, 245, 449,
Trautman, A. 368 468-9, 563
Tuisku, P. 18 staircase 85, 127
Tusci couple 171 verdet constant 224, 578, 580, 588
twist ribbon 32, 150, 256-7, 289 verdrehung 564
vortex 14, 16-7, 132, 135-6, 138, 145,
U 221, 246, 256, 270, 299, 300, 302-4,
379, 507, 590-1, 593
units and definitions of, 33-4, 37-8, 41- vorticity 132, 246, 583, 588, 591, 635
44, 169, 215-6, 239-245, 625-662
unit circle 19-20, 114-5, 125, 259, 264, W
269-71
unit speed curve 1, 3 W boson 248, 296-7
unit sphere 20, 140 wave
Unruh temperature 121-3, 472 contracted moving standing xi, 86, 88,
Urban, M. 16 90, 98, 102, 104, 118-9, 128, 130,
166, 210, 212-3, 215-7, 465, 485-6,
V 489-91, 494, 496, 498-9, 500, 528,
530, 555, 557, 560, 614
vacuum envelope 8-9, 35, 38, 86, 105, 119,
energy xi, xiii, 14, 34, 101, 133, 316, 210, 213, 352, 407, 607
319, 362, 379, 389, 402, 414, 588, equation 2, 20, 89, 161, 260, 309-10,
592, 597 334, 344, 353, 365, 368, 413-4
impedance 13, 33, 44, 82, 96-7, 135, group velocity 2, 4,7-9, 11, 33, 35, 37,
220, 228, 241, 245, 594, 597, 653, 57, 65, 82, 84, 87, 95, 103, 105,
677 108-9, 329, 341, 416, 448, 466-7,
nonlinear polarization 320, 329, 389, 483, 487, 556, 588, 597
392-3, 419, 421, 423, 462, 509, interference x, xii, 60, 68, 70, 76, 111,
593, 597 238, 289, 293-4, 350-1, 353, 355-6,

702
 Index
wave interference (cont) Weber, W. 226, 396
413, 427-8, 430, 432, 440-1, 443, constant 29, 226
463-4, 470-1, 473, 477, 479, 621 force 226, 334
longitudinal xi, 5-7, 160, 276, 353, inertial mass 16, 634
487, 555 Weber’s law 226-7
matter xi, 70, 78, 84, 88, 93, 101, units 340, 648
109, 113, 116, 120-1, 124, 128-9, weight 29, 349, 369, 374, 436, 551
141, 160, 166, 210, 305-6, 328, Wesley, J. 148
349, 457, 479, 498, 529, 530-1, Weyl,
555, 557, 561, 588 curvature tensor 276, 316, 434, 435-6,
node displacement 84, 465 440
number 1-6, 10, 39, 31-2, 33, 37, 39, gauge transformation 259
47, 61-64, 67-70, 81-2, 86-7, 96, tidal deformation 435, 436-7
98, 218-9, 378, 635 Wick rotation 250, 254, 260
packet 1-2, 38, 93, 588, 598 Williamson, J. and van der Mark, M. 148
phase velocity 2, 4, 7-9, 11, 33, 35, 57, Wilson, H. 76, 328, 441
78, 82-4, 87, 95-6, 103, 105, 108-9, Winterberg, F. ix, 14, 16, 25, 34, 132,
117, 141, 413, 449, 466-7, 470, 135, 138, 148, 299, 353, 379, 419-20
484, 486-7, 489-90, 511, 594, 597 whirl number xii, 154, 166, 205, 240
phase difference xi, 7, 27, 84, 128, 250, Whittaker, E. T.,
252, 256, 289, 300, 329, 350, 427, force between moving charges 226-7
457, 460-1, 465-9, 473, 485, 487, scalar potential 413
489, 498, 561 scalar wave 429
phasor 19-20, 88, 90, 111, 114, 124-6, winding number 16, 220, 270, 289, 295,
129, 210-1, 217, 263-4, 496, 624 611, 613, 626
standing x-xiii, 16, 21, 23, 83, 88, 90,
217, 498-9, 500, 514, 527-8, 530, X
551-2, 554, 555-7,560-1,570, 573,
575, 587, 593, 601, 607-9, 614-5, X-ray 45-6, 68, 111, 357, 443, 451, 551-2
635
transverse xi, 1, 5, 7-10, 60, 88, 91, 95- Y
8, 102-3, 108-9, 160, 226, 276,
555, 652 Yank 629
travelling x, xii, 1-4, 18-9, 21, 83, 88-
90, 124, 126, 140-1, 150, 210, 223, Z
237, 323, 325-7, 351, 362, 433,
467, 479, 482-8, 529, 557, 574, Z boson 248
598, 608 Zeeman interactions 224
vector 1-6, 10, 31-3, 37, 39, 47, 61-64, Zel’dovich, Y. 323, 361
67-70, 81-2, 86-7, 96, 98, 162, 218- zero curvature vacuum 1, 4, 16, 19, 51,
9, 378, 415, 426, 493, 558, 598, 78-9, 83, 133, 141, 210, 328, 381-2,
617, 635 404, 420, 435, 446, 499
wavefront x, xii-xiii, 1-2, 5, 17-8, 60-4, zero-point
68, 73, 76, 78-82, 84, 91, 95, 100, energy 13, 20, 29, 34, 121, 132, 378,
102-3, 111, 122, 156-7, 238, 269, 289, 516
323, 409, 412, 426-7, 429-30, 432, field (ZPF) 13, 121, 133, 319
441, 488, 507, 592, 597 fluctuation 166, 429, 516
wave function 15, 17, 25, 29, 89, 126, radiation spectrum 121, 123, 452
133, 160, 164, 260, 267, 270, 276, Zitterbewegung
307, 309, 344, 413, 462-3, 554, 612 frequency 149, 151, 166, 205, 210,
wavelength 218, 220
Compton xii, 14, 39, 83-4, 98, 110, motion 207, 267, 378
149, 151-2, 156, 169, 212, 215, radius 151-3, 198, 231
218, 220, 223-4, 236, 238, 288, 478 Zollner, J. 396
de Broglie 84, 87, 102,110, 141, 212, zoom-orbit whirl 39, 154, 166
216-8, 487, 514, 544, 548, 569 zone plate 70, 72, 288, 473
Doppler 102, 108-9, 118, 215-16, 564 Zou Yan 134

703
 Geometrical description of
photons, electrons and
composite particles.
Dimensional analysis of
electrical charge.
Quantum gravity,
gravitational frequency
spectrum, mass oscillator
synchronization, spectral
energy density modulation
and phase conjugation.
Origin of charge, fine
structure constant and
inertia. Prospects for
wave-based EM
propulsion.

Quantum Wave Mechanics

by Larry Reed

Order the complete book from the publisher Booklocker.com

https://www.booklocker.com/p/books/10176.html?s=pdf
or from your favorite neighborhood
or online bookstore.