This document summarizes the key learnings from weeks 1-5 of a reflective journal for a management course. In week 1, the student learned about management concepts, functions, strategies and developing an action plan for a community services organization. Week 2 covered non-profit governance and their role in addressing social challenges. Week 3 distinguished between leadership and management. Week 4 discussed motivational theories and their importance for engaging employees. Finally, week 5 explored decision making processes and factors that influence decision quality such as alignment with goals and consideration of alternatives.
This document summarizes the key learnings from weeks 1-5 of a reflective journal for a management course. In week 1, the student learned about management concepts, functions, strategies and developing an action plan for a community services organization. Week 2 covered non-profit governance and their role in addressing social challenges. Week 3 distinguished between leadership and management. Week 4 discussed motivational theories and their importance for engaging employees. Finally, week 5 explored decision making processes and factors that influence decision quality such as alignment with goals and consideration of alternatives.
This document summarizes the key learnings from weeks 1-5 of a reflective journal for a management course. In week 1, the student learned about management concepts, functions, strategies and developing an action plan for a community services organization. Week 2 covered non-profit governance and their role in addressing social challenges. Week 3 distinguished between leadership and management. Week 4 discussed motivational theories and their importance for engaging employees. Finally, week 5 explored decision making processes and factors that influence decision quality such as alignment with goals and consideration of alternatives.
This document summarizes the key learnings from weeks 1-5 of a reflective journal for a management course. In week 1, the student learned about management concepts, functions, strategies and developing an action plan for a community services organization. Week 2 covered non-profit governance and their role in addressing social challenges. Week 3 distinguished between leadership and management. Week 4 discussed motivational theories and their importance for engaging employees. Finally, week 5 explored decision making processes and factors that influence decision quality such as alignment with goals and consideration of alternatives.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Assessment 3: Reflective Journal for 10 Weeks
Week 1: Foundations of management practice
In this week, we were introduced to management concepts, functions and strategies in the community services sector. Throughout this week, my involvement in the business concepts, applications, and strategies of the community ministry has been enlightening (Robbins, et.al., 2015). I delved into the complex web of organizational structures, leadership styles, and key roles that drive these projects forward. Understanding the nuances of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling gave me a comprehensive overview of how efficiencies can boost community-based businesses. Furthermore, the requirement of an action plan developed for this sector has highlighted the importance of aligning objectives with community needs. Armed with this knowledge, we are well equipped to navigate the dynamic environment of community service management and support impactful contributions. Moreover, during this week I learned about major themes and theories of management that are important in managing an organization. This week’s course provides a foundational understanding of important management topics and principles needed for effective organizational management (Robbins, et.al., 2015). Examining concepts such as classical, behavioral, and contemporary approaches, we captured different perspectives on effective leadership, decision- making, and team dynamics. This insight is essential to organize coherent and efficient operations within an organization, thereby becoming a platform for informed and strategic management practices. Week 2: Governance This week I learned about not-for-profit organisations and their role in community. I gained valuable insight into non-profit organizations and the important role they play in the community. Motivated by mission rather than profit, these organizations play a vital role in solving social challenges and fostering positive change (Hudson, 2009). Non-profits stimulate social improvement by channeling resources and efforts into local needs, such as education, health care, and social services I come to point out their delicate balance between factors of sustainability and serving the greater good through effective fundraising, volunteer engagement and strategic partnerships to leverage their impact and drive sustainable growth come into the lives of people in need. Furthermore, I learned more about the management in non-profit organization. This week’s class work/activities deepened my understanding of management in nonprofit organizations, and revealed differentiated principles of mission and leadership. The dynamics of these organizations include better allocation of limited resources, engaging interested volunteers, and creating collaboration to achieve social goals in communities (Hudson, 2009). Balanced economic policies and livelihoods tracking impact emphasizes the importance of good governance, transparent communication and effective fundraising in these organizations. I learned that successful non-profit organization’s management relies on skills to navigate the challenges of stakeholder program development and community engagement, empowering these organizations to deliver change meaningful, sustainable results in the communities they serve. Week 3: Leadership During this week, I learned about leadership and how it is different from management. Over the course of this week, I have explored the distinction between leadership and management, unraveling their nuanced roles within organizations. While management primarily involves the coordination of tasks, resources, and processes to achieve established goals, leadership is more concerned with inspiring and guiding individuals towards a shared vision (Robbins et al., 2015). Leadership transcends formal authority, encompassing qualities like vision, innovation, and the ability to motivate and empower teams. Management, on the other hand, centers around planning, organizing, and overseeing day-to-day operations. Understanding this difference has highlighted the importance of cultivating both skill sets to foster a harmonious and effective organizational environment that balances execution and inspiration. In addition, I learned that leadership plays a multifaceted role in organizational success. It serves as a guiding light that clarifies the mission, direction and objectives of the organization and fosters a shared understanding and shared purpose among members. By motivating individuals, leadership fuels intrinsic enthusiasm and commitment, fostering an environment where individuals willingly invest their efforts. Leaders also act as scouts, actively seeking novel opportunities for growth, innovation, and expansion (Robbins et al., 2015). This visionary approach provides organizations with a dynamic edge in an ever-evolving landscape. Furthermore, leadership imparts a sense of purpose, anchoring individuals to a higher cause and rallying them around a common mission. Ultimately, leadership's ability to focus people on tasks aligns efforts cohesively, propelling the organization toward its objectives with clarity and purpose. Week 4: Motivational theories In this week I learned more about motivational theories and their role in an organization. Throughout this week, my exploration of motivational theories has shed light on their profound significance within organizations. These theories delve into the complex realm of human psychology, offering insights into what drives individuals to engage actively and passionately in their work. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, for instance, underscores how employees' needs progress from basic survival to self-actualization, highlighting the importance of addressing these layers to foster motivation (Robbins et al., 2015). Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory delves into the dual nature of factors that influence motivation, differentiating between hygiene factors that prevent dissatisfaction and motivational factors that enhance engagement. Equity Theory underscores the importance of perceived fairness in distributing rewards and recognition. By grasping these theories, I have recognized that motivation is not a one-size-fits-all approach; it is a nuanced interplay of various factors, including individual needs, perceptions of fairness, and the fulfillment derived from the work itself. Effectively leveraging these theories can empower organizations to cultivate a motivated workforce, leading to enhanced job satisfaction, productivity and overall success. Week 5: Decision Making This week offered more details about decision making process and quality of a decision. I gained a broader understanding of the decision-making process, which is the cornerstone of effective productivity. I have found that decisions tend to follow a structured process: the problem or opportunity is identified, relevant information is gathered, options are developed and evaluated, choices are made, the decision is implemented, and finally results are evaluated. The importance of rational decision-making, where choices are made systematically based on thorough analysis of available information and options, has been emphasized but I also found that real-world information often makes sense limited, where time, information and perspective can constrain decisions. The importance of heuristics and intuition has been emphasized, despite the potential risks of bias. Exploring the intricacies of decision quality has been enlightening. I have learned that the quality of a decision is determined by its alignment with organizational goals, the accuracy of information used, the consideration of alternatives, and the potential risks and benefits. The concept of decision quality is closely tied to outcomes; as effective decisions lead to desired results. However, I've come to realize that quality isn't solely determined by hindsight; even well-informed decisions can yield unfavorable outcomes due to unforeseen circumstances. Moreover, understanding the difference between effectiveness (achieving intended results) and efficiency (minimizing resources used) has unveiled the multidimensionality of decision quality. This week's insights have underscored the need for a balanced approach that accounts for both rational analysis and adaptive thinking in striving for decisions that align with organizational objectives and enhance overall performance.