Diagnosis and Management of Root Resorption in Traumatized Teeth
Diagnosis and Management of Root Resorption in Traumatized Teeth
Diagnosis and Management of Root Resorption in Traumatized Teeth
Case Report
Abstract
Internal resorption (IR) is a progressive process initiated within the pulp space with the loss of dentin. Although trauma and pulp
inflammation/infection are the major contributory factors in the initiation of IR, all the etiologic factors and the pathogenesis have not yet
been completely elucidated. Cervical external resorption is defined as a localized resorptive process that commences on the surface of the root
below the epithelial attachment and the coronal aspect of the supporting alveolar process, namely, the zone of the connective tissue attachment.
This report is presented two cases of root resorption (external cervical resorption and inflammatory IR) in traumatized teeth where cone beam
computed tomography has been used as an important diagnostic tool. Treatment of external cervical resorption involved endodontics and
periodontics. In case with inflammatory IR, only endodontic treatment was necessary. The postoperative course was uneventful and a stable
clinical outcome was obtained.
DOI: How to cite this article: Lima TF, Neto JV, de Jesus Soares A. Diagnosis
10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_138_16 and management of root resorption in traumatized teeth: Report of two
cases. Eur J Gen Dent 2017;6:127-30.
© 2017 European Journal of General Dentistry | Published by Wolters Kluwer ‑ Medknow 127
Lima, et al.: Management of root resorption in traumatized teeth
the evaluation of tooth 21. During the anamnesis, the patient the canal with paper points, the root canal was filled with
reported a bicycle accident at 8 years of age old that caused an gutta‑percha plasticized cones and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply
enamel and dentin fracture in teeth 11, 12, and 21. Clinically, Maillefer, Petrópolis, Brazil). The tooth was then sealed
tooth 21 did not respond to pulp sensitivity testing (Endo–Frost, with coltosol (Coltene Whaledent, NJ, USA) and composite
Roeko, Langenau, Germany), and the patient reported no resin (Filtek; 3M Espe, Sumaré, Brazil) [Figure 1c].
pain on percussion and palpation. Radiographic examination
After 3 days, the patient reported no symptoms when she
showed a radiolucent area in the cervical region of tooth 21,
returned for surgical repair of cervical external resorption.
thereby suggesting external cervical resorption. No periapical
The patient was anesthetized, and an intrasulcular incision
lesion was observed [Figure 1a].
was made with a detachment of the mucoperiosteal flap. The
CBCT was performed (Galileos; Sirona Dental, Bensheim, resorption area was exposed, and curettage of the granulation
Hessen, Germany) to determine the extent and depth of the tissue was maintained. Subsequently, the area was irrigated
lesion in the three spatial levels. Based on the CBCT images copiously with saline solution, the bleeding was controlled,
and three‑dimensional (3D) reconstructions [Figure 1b], a and the cavity was restored with resin‑modified glass ionomer
diagnosis of cervical external resorption of Heithersay’s[9] cement (Vitremer; 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). The area
class II was determined. The treatment plan included was then closed with sutures, which were removed 7 days
endodontic treatment and surgical intervention for removal of later [Figure 2]. After a follow‑up of 18 months, the patient
the inflamed granulation tissue that occupied the lesion cavity reported no symptoms and examination revealed a lack of
and repair of the resorption defect with resin‑modified glass periapical changes [Figure 1d].
ionomer cement.
Case 2
After the patient was anesthetized, the crown was accessed A 25‑year‑old male was referred to the Dental Trauma Service
followed by absolute isolation. Root canal was cleaned and at the Piracicaba Dental School (University of Campinas) for
shaped up to the size of the R40 (40.06) instrument of the the evaluation of tooth 21. During the anamnesis, the patient
RECIPROC system (VDW, Munich, Germany). Odontometry reported experiencing dental trauma at 7‑year‑old, but he did
was performed using an electronic apex locator (Novapex; not remember the details of the accident. Clinically, the dental
Forum Technologies, Richion, Le‑Zion, Israel). Root canal crown was not darkened, and all anterior teeth responded to the
was irrigated with 2.5% NOCl. All procedures were performed sensitivity test (Endo‑Frost). The patient reported no pain upon
under the magnification of a surgical microscope. Before root percussion or palpation. Radiographic examination revealed
canal filling, An Irrisonic E1 (20/.01) tip (Helse Industria e that the absence of periapical lesions, but inflammatory IR
Comercio, Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Brazil) fitted to an ENAC in tooth 21 [Figure 3a]. Given these clinical observations,
ultrasonic handpiece (Osada Electric Co., Aichi, Japan) set to endodontic treatment was indicated.
power 3 was placed 1 mm short of the working length (WL)
After the patient underwent anesthetic procedures, cavity
and first activated with 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl followed by
access, absolute isolation, and initial instrumentation of
5 mL 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and
the root canal were performed using nickel‑titanium hand
finally with 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl solution. All solutions were
files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The root
renewed and activated by three cycles of 20 s. After drying
canal was irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl during mechanical
preparation. During this stage, there was profuse bleeding
within the canal. The canal was irrigated with saline solution,
and an intracanal medication, which was a combination of 2%
chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide, was manipulated
and inserted using lentulo spirals. The tooth was sealed
coronally with coltosol (Coltene Whaledent) and composite
a b
a b c
c d
Figure 1: External cervical resorption of maxillary left central incisor. d e f
(a) Preoperative periapical radiography. (b) Cone beam computed Figure 2: Surgical access of external cervical resorption: (a) Clinical
tomography. (c) Endodontic treatment. (d) 18 months follow‑up: aspects. (b) Incision. (c) Surgical exposure of resorption. (d) Restoration
Radiographic aspects with glass ionomer. (e and f) Clinical aspects after suture