On Writing Up Paper in Reputable Journals - UNAIR Menulis Tayang
On Writing Up Paper in Reputable Journals - UNAIR Menulis Tayang
On Writing Up Paper in Reputable Journals - UNAIR Menulis Tayang
• General Conditions
• Editorial Suggestions
Why Write and Publish Research
Papers?
• Ideally – to share research findings and discoveries with the hope of improving
healthcare.
• Practically –
- to get funding
- to get promoted
- to get a job
- to keep your job!
- to be graduated!
Why Write and Publish Research
Papers?
ع َملُهُ ِإ اَّل ِم إن َ ط َع َ َان ا إنق
ُ س ِ ات إ
َ اْل إن َ ِإ َذا َم
اريَ ٍة َو ِع ْل ٍم يُ ْنتَفَ ُع ِب ِه َ ث َ ََلث َ ٍة ِم إن
ِ ص َدقَ ٍة َج
ُعو لَه َ َو َولَ ٍد
ُ صا ِلحٍ يَ إد
“Jika seseorang meninggal dunia, maka terputuslah
amalannya kecuali tiga perkara (yaitu): sedekah jariyah,
ilmu yang dimanfaatkan, atau do’a anak yang sholeh”
(HR. Muslim no. 1631)
Programmatic
Career
Badri Munir Sukoco
Publication Process
Competitive Dynamics Research Program
Executing through Time Management
Letting the Process Drive you Through
Integrating Research with Teaching
Developing A Research-Centered Balanced
Academic Career
Baseline
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
#521-
Ranking #824 #820 #701-750 #751-800 #651-700
530
Sumber : factfile 2021
Data Cut Off :
CITATION PER PUBLICATION 2015-2019 2015-2019
(Articles and Reviews)
1 University of Indonesia 196 224 436 729 756 118 848 905 932 705 271 12 3673 1,49
2 Gadjah Mada University 75 130 192 302 315 95 481 966 639 491 188 28 2793 2,52
3 Institut Pertanian Bogor 75 108 117 123 143 50 710 813 826 300 130 10 2789 4,53
4 Bandung Institute of Technology 85 180 197 290 307 67 574 835 500 275 146 21 2351 2,09
5 Universitas Diponegoro 32 72 428 173 277 107 159 288 588 295 181 63 1574 1,45
6 Brawijaya University 58 71 112 268 375 83 176 515 330 378 135 12 1546 1,60
7 Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember 21 42 110 105 159 25 247 150 478 152 120 14 1161 2,51
8 Padjadjaran University 53 110 110 145 413 61 168 280 191 174 290 0 1103 1,24
9 Universitas Sebelas Maret 49 78 121 156 245 71 140 168 313 199 134 17 971 1,35
10 Universitas Airlangga 12 27 66 82 405 159 30 132 140 144 220 3 669 0,89
Poorly prepared
The article not ready, only a draft
The article is too parochial (will not appeal to a wider, international audience)
Poor English (if English is not your first language, seek help)
Technically poor
Too short or too long (check the article length specified in author guidelines)
Article is submitted to the wrong journal (material not of relevance to readership)
Nothing new is stated or found
Under-theorized Under-contextualized
Not properly a journal article (e.g. better suited to another form of publication)
Abstract - Why Does It Matter?
Abstracts have always served the function of "selling" your work.
On-line search databases typically contain only abstracts; thus, a complete but
concise description of your work could entice potential readers into obtaining a
copy of the full paper.
It could increase the chance of people taking the time to obtain and read your
complete paper.
Abstract - Components (Koopman, 1997)
1. Motivation
2. Problem statement,
3. Approach,
4. Results,
5. Conclusions
Introduction
Articles are like dates: first impressions matter.
The introduction determines whether or not readers will continue reading.
It provides the interpretive frame that shapes how reviewers read a
manuscript during the review process.
If reviewers are intrigued by the research question, appreciate its importance,
and understand how the study advances understanding of the topic, they’ll
look for reasons to recommend revision.
If reviewers are not excited, they’ll find more reasons to reject.
Effective Introduction
1. Who cares? What is the topic or research question, and why is it interesting
and important in theory and practice?
2. What do we know, what don’t we know, and so what? What key theoretical
perspectives and empirical findings have already informed the topic or
question? What major, unaddressed puzzle, controversy, or paradox does this
study address, and why does it need to be addressed?
3. What will we learn? How does your study fundamentally change, challenge,
or advance scholars’ understanding?
Shooting Reputable Journals –
Dynamic Capabilities
• Reconfiguring