SM Sep2023
SM Sep2023
ND SATCOM
Stand 1.C48
www.ndsatcom.com
Publishing Operations & Contributors Features
Silvano Payne The Forrester Report #1: SES—Much more cash to come from C-band..........................................................4
Publisher + Executive Author Author: Chris Forrester, Senior Contributor
The Forrester Report #2: Ariane 5 ends… but where is Ariane 6?.....................................................................8
Simon Payne Author: Chris Forrester, Senior Contributor
Chief Technical Officer LEO Satellites Orbit Estimations Using Precise Point Positioning...................................................................14
Author: James Bartle, Fugro SpaceStar
Bridging The Gap: Overcoming interoperability challenges.............................................................................18
Hartley G. Lesser Author: Alastair MacLeod, Ground Control
Editorial Director + Executive Author
Digital Twins In Action: How government can take flight in the virtual world................................................22
Author: Greg Porter, Sev1Tech
Pattie Lesser The Key To Delivering Change In Maritime Decarbonization Is… Collaboration...........................................26
Executive Editor + Executive Author Author: Inmarsat Maritime
Dynamic Predictive Routing For LEO SATCOM Networks................................................................................28
Donald McGee Author: Rob Hunter, CGI UK
Production Manager Enhancing Satellite Data With SDRs In Ground Stations.................................................................................32
Author: Brandon Malatest, Per Vices
An Alternative Software Development Approach For Evolving........................................................................34
Teresa Sanderson And Complex Space Systems
Operations Director
Author: Dr. Peter Mendham, Bright Ascension
Satellite-Based Earth Observation System Analysis And Trends....................................................................38
Sean Payne Authors: Allied Market Research Analysts
Business Development Manager 5G New Radio NTN: Why it will take the SATCOM market by storm...............................................................42
Author: Thorleif Astrup Holland, Gatehouse Satcom
Advertisers
Chris Forrester 2023 Milsat Symposium..........................................................................................................................................25
Senior Columnist
2023 Satellite Innovation........................................................................................................................................24
ACORDE Technologies, S.A...................................................................................................................................23
Karl Fuchs Advantech Wireless Technologies, Inc.................................................................................................................13
Senior Columnist
APSCC Asia-Pacific Satellite Communications Council.....................................................................................45
C-COM........................................................................................................................................................................7
Authors
Calian, Advanced Technologies.............................................................................................................................19
Allied Market Research Analysts Comtech.....................................................................................................................................................................1
James Bartle CPI Antenna Technologies.....................................................................................................................................29
Chris Forrester CPI SATCOM Products...........................................................................................................................................48
Es’hailSat.................................................................................................................................................................11
Thorleif Astrup Holland
Euroconsult: World Satellite Business Week........................................................................................................37
Rob Hunter
Hughes Network Systems........................................................................................................................................5
Lalit Katare
INTEGRASYS.............................................................................................................................................................9
Inmarsat Maritime Mission Microwave Technologies, LLC.................................................................................................................35
Alastair MacLeod ND SATCOM..............................................................................................................................................................2
Brandon Malatest Omnetics Connector Corporation.........................................................................................................................21
Resolve Optics.........................................................................................................................................................39
Dr. Peter Mendham
RF-DESIGN..............................................................................................................................................................17
Greg Porter
SatService GmbH....................................................................................................................................................31
Kirstie Williams
Space & Satellite Professionals International (SSPI)...........................................................................................43
STN STORITVE d.o.o...............................................................................................................................................47
Terrasat Communications Inc................................................................................................................................27
Tesat-Spacecom GmbH & Co. CG.........................................................................................................................41
W.B. Walton Enterprises.........................................................................................................................................33
Wavestream.............................................................................................................................................................15
SatMagazine is published 11 times per year by SatNews Publishers, 800 Siesta Way, Sonoma, California - 94576 - USA — Phone: (707) 939-9306 / Fax: (707) 939-9235 © 2023 SatNews Publishers
We reserve the right to edit all submitted materials to meet publication content guidelines, as well as for grammar and spelling errors, or to move articles to an alternative issue to accommodate publication space requirements, or remove
content due to space restrictions or unacceptable content. Submission of articles does not constitute acceptance of said material by SatNews Publishers. Edited materials may, or may not, be returned to authors and/or companies for
review, prior to publication. The views expressed in SatNews Publishers’ various publications do not necessarily reflect the views opinions of SatNews Publishers. All rights reserved. All included imagery is courtesy of, and copyright to,
the respective companies and/or named individuals. SatNews reserves the right to alter publication dates and print issue designations, based on industry event date changes and circumstances that are beyond the control of SatNews
Publishers or the company’s staff.
Acting CEO Ruy Pinto and Jalan were briefing analysts after the
company’s results announcement which reported a near 10 percent rise in
overall revenues for the half-year. SES reported a very healthy rise of 9.8%
in overall revenues at 987 million feuros or the 6 months to June 30.
• Video division: 486 million euros, a fall of 5.2%, y-o-y. “Management suggested they are able to quickly recover function and
• Networks division 501 million euros, growth of 3.1% suggested it was not worried on any short or long term impact. On mPOWER 5
• (Mobility up 13.8%) and 6 craft management suggested the satellites were undergoing further tests
in Boeing’s facility and would be launched in Q3 for a late 2023 entry into service
Contract backlog for SES as of June 30, 2023, was 4.7 billion euros (5.7 billion date for mPower,” said equity analyst Sami Kassab from investment bank
euros gross backlog, including backlog with contractual break clauses). Exane/BNPP.
Pinto said, “The strong start to the year continued into Q2 resulting in a solid “Given the recurring postponement of mPOWER satellite launches and in the
H1 financial performance and confirmation of the 2023 financial outlook. context of today’s disclosure of sporadic electronic malfunction, it is hard not
Networks is growing on the back of strong performance in Mobility and robust see a causality link between these tech issues and the delayed entry into service
outturns in Government and Fixed Data. In Video, we have signed additional of the constellation,” added Kassab.
important renewals which underpin the long-term cash fundamentals and value
of our direct-to-home neighborhoods. With O3b mPOWER expected to be mPOWER is the new fleet for SES’s O3b segment, and by any measure there
in commercial service by the end of this year, customers will benefit from an has been slippage on the launch – and thus revenue-generating – satellites.
expanded set of capabilities for flexible, guaranteed, and high-performance However, on the more positive upside SES management argued that despite
connectivity to meet requirements in competitive, high growth segments,” increased competition from Elon Musk’s Starlink in Mobility, its maritime
revenues grew 30 percent and continued to perform well.
The prospects of more revenue, over and about the $3 billion, plus around $500
million in cost reimbursements from the refitting of filters and new reception Kassab’s comments on the overall position at SES stated: “SES H1 results
equipment for its North American clients and their head-ends, the prospects of were strong and marked by a return to positive group organic growth in Q223.
another slice of the C-band cake helped drive SES’ share price up more than It confirmed its FY guidance and while the C-band money is not yet in the bank,
15 percent on August 3 to around €6.68 and a welcome improvement on its management announced a surprise share buyback programme (of €150m) and
lacklustre performance recently. clearly suggested that more cash returns was on the agenda. Today’s share
price spike is deserved but as long as mPower is not proving a commercial
However, there was also bad news in the form of a sporadic malfunction of a success, shares are likely to remain volatile. We reaffirm our Outperform rating.”
fraction of the electronic components on board orbiting mPOWER satellites.
Q4 revenues stood at 286 million euros, down 2.3% like-for-like. Revenues of Eutelsat expects to receive $382m in compensation from the FCC under its
the five Operating Verticals stood at 283 million euros, down 4.1% y-o-y and up C-band agreement. Payment is expected in September and will be subject to a
4.7% q-o-q on a like-for-like basis. Eutelsat’s all-important contracted backlog 30% tax payment.
also fell back. The backlog stood at 3.4 billion euros as of June 30, 2023, versus
4.0 billion a year earlier.
www.c-comsat.com
The Forrester Report
#2
Ariane 5 ends...
but where is Ariane 6?
Author: Chris Forrester, Senior Columnist
July 4th was a good day for Arianespace’s hugely successful Ariane 5 rocket March 2014, Ariane 6 was projected to be launched in July of 2020. That date
which flawlessly launched a pair of satellites, those being a French military slipped, and slipped... and slipped again. As this column is being written, the
spacecraft and a communications technology testbed for Germany. new Ariane 6 vehicle is not expected to make the inaugural launch until 2024,
years later than originally planned.
The Ariane 5 carried the Heinrich-Hertz
test craft and France’s Syracuse 4B Arianespace and the European Space Agency
satellites into a geostationary transfer and that organization’s various production
orbit (GEO) from the French Guiana Space partners wanted Ariane 6 to be dramatically less
Center in Kourou on the northeastern coast expensive to fly than Ariane 5. Ariane 5 typically
of South America. charged up to 150 million euros, depending on
the task required. The design brief for Ariane 6
The success was a justifiable moment of talked about achieving about 70 million euros
praise for Ariane 5’s longevity — its first per flight, about half of the Ariane 5 price.
flight took place back in 1996 — and,
despite a few initial hiccups, the various The fee was not an accident, but represented
versions of Ariane 5 have completed 116 a direct element of competition to Elon Musk’s
launches. However, inevitably, there was SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets.
also sadness, given that the July 4 launch
was the last for the Ariane 5 rocket. However, Arianespace had a few back-up
rockets in reserve. First, there was the long-
By now, there should have been an Ariane running relationship with Russia’s Soyuz rocket
6 launch vehicle ready to take over the family... however, the Ukraine invasion by
European, heavy-launch demands for Photo of the Heinrich-Hertz 4B An Ariane 5 lauch vehicle Russia ruined that scheme.
capacity — but it is late... very late. As of satellite, courtesy of OHB. liftoff. Photo is courtesy of
Arianespace.
Interference Interference
Geolocation Mitigation & Removal
REQUEST YOUR
REQUEST YOUR DEMO
DEMO
INTEGRASYS BOOTH
INTEGRASYS BOOTH
The Task Force has not offered any information as to a likely launch date for
the test flights. One contractor involved in the project (OHB) has publicly said
that the Ariane 6 debut launch would not happen until the early part of 2024.
Airborne hours.
Connectivity
Ka and Ku band KRFU solutions.
Line-Fit certified by Boeing, Airbus and
other major aircraft manufacturers.
We’re ready to support your in-flight
connectivity solution.
www.wavestream.com
Onboard
Architecture
For the demonstration, the
architecture onboard the satellite
saw the SpaceStar® software
integrated onto a software defined
radio (SDR) and flown as a payload.
The expectation is that future
architecture options will also see
SpaceStar® integrated directly at
the GNSS receiver level. In both
cases, the hardware is integrated
with the Fugro L-band tracking
and demodulator software for the
acquisition and decoding of the
correction signal and the Fugro
SpaceStar® position engine.
RF remote sensing
Techniques, such as such as synthetic aperture
radar (SAR), radio-occultation, reflectometry,
and RF-geolocation, can all require precise, orbit
determination that necessitates the use of ground-
based post processing which has an inherent level
of built-in latency. For some end users, this is not
of concern; however, there may be other users who
are concerned predominantly with rapidly changing
events, where latency is undesirable and directly
diminishes the value of the information. Additionally,
some applications also use formation flying
techniques that can also benefit from precise real-time
positioning of each of the satellites.
Thruster calibration
Thruster calibration and precise orbital maneuvers
have the potential to be more efficiently enabled.
Direct measurements of delta-v can be observed
in real-time to levels of accuracy of less than five
millimeters per second. This, potentially, enables
better on-orbit characterization of on-board thrusters
and that could lead to more efficient fuel usage and,
potentially, longer mission life.
The Internet of Things (IoT) has already enabled What’s more, interoperability makes it easier to add new systems and devices
unprecedented levels of connectivity, data collection, Alastair MacLeod to existing infrastructure, making it more scalable and adaptable to changing
and analysis across industry, and the renewables energy needs. This is especially important in the renewables industry, where
sector is no exception. IoT devices can be used to monitor the performance of new sources of energy are constantly being developed and added to existing
renewable energy assets such as turbines and generators, using real-time data energy systems — secure, stable connectivity with the grid is essential.
to improve efficiency and reduce downtime.
One of the most significant challenges to achieving interoperability is
However, these devices rely on interoperability to function effectively. IoT communication and integration issues between different hardware and
devices must be able to communicate with each other and other systems, software systems. renewable energy systems are often composed of different
such as cloud-based platforms and data integration tools, to deliver increased components and technologies that may not be compatible with each other. For
efficiency, cost reduction and improved sustainability. example, solar panels from one manufacturer may not be able to communicate
effectively with inverters from another manufacturer. This can result in
Why does interpretability matter? In the renewables sector, interoperability is inefficiencies, data silos and increased costs.
essential for ensuring that all hardware and software systems can communicate
with each other, regardless of the manufacturer or technology used. As Interoperability can increase the vulnerability of renewable energy systems
renewable energy assets are often located in remote locations, where terrestrial to cyber attacks. When different systems and devices are connected and
coverage is intermittent or unavailable, it can be difficult to maintain connectivity exchanging data, it can create new attack vectors that may not have been
and monitor performance. considered in the design of the original system.
calian.com/advanced-technologies
In addition, currently there is no universally accepted standard for renewable
energy systems, which can make it difficult for different systems to
communicate and exchange data effectively. This can lead to inefficiencies,
reduced data quality, and increased costs.
What’s more, often renewable energy assets such as wind turbines or solar
farms, are located in remote areas. These areas may experience intermittent or
even complete lack of traditional terrestrial coverage, which can make it difficult
to establish reliable connection for data exchange and remote monitoring.
The can be little doubt regarding the importance of resilient and ubiquitous
connectivity. At present, a mere 15% of the Earth’s surface is supported
by conventional terrestrial communications infrastructure, some of which is
complex, vulnerable and expensive to maintain. Satellites, in contrast, can
provide global coverage and are comparatively resilient — unaffected by, for
instance, natural disasters. APIs (Application Programming Interface) provide a standardized way for
different systems to communicate and exchange data, while data integration
In our own blog “The role of 5G and Satellite technology in Industry 4.0,” we tools enable companies to consolidate and manage data from multiple sources.
discussed the three key areas where satellite can complement 5G and terrestrial By leveraging these tools, companies can improve data quality, reduce data
networks, augmenting network reach to include rural, remote areas, embedding silos, and streamline communication between different systems. Simply, APIs
redundancy and, of course, additional backhaul capability. and data integration tools are powerful tools for achieving interoperability.
As assets such as reservoirs and wind turbines are in remote, rugged Moreover, cloud-based solutions can play a critical role in enabling remote
environments often it’s not financially viable to build or maintain the infrastructure connectivity for renewable energy systems. By storing data in the cloud,
required to support these assets via terrestrial or fiber connectivity. In fact, companies can access data from anywhere with an internet connection, enabling
a recent survey by Inmarsat found that 91% of business leaders felt satellite remote monitoring and management of renewable energy systems. Cloud-based
connectivity was key to improving the effectiveness of IoT solutions. solutions also provide a scalable and cost-effective way to store and manage
data, enabling companies to optimise energy resources more effectively.
Perhaps, unsurprisingly then, satellite has become an increasingly popular
solution for assets outside traditional terrestrial coverage to ensure reliable, Managing growth and the related costs can be extremely challenging. In Europe
blanket network coverage. in 2022, solar and wind power generated 22% of all electricity, according to
European Electricity Review 2023, outstripping fossil fuel (20%) for the first
Important considerations for satellite integration include regulatory (spectrum time. However, according to Wood Mackenzie Power, $8.5 billion was being
allocation and licensing, for example), while others are capital, not least of spent on unplanned repairs and corrections caused by component failures in
which is the cost of deploying satellite-enabled devices. In short, hardware wind operations.
compatibility and power management are important considerations for anyone
looking to introduce satellite IoT modules into their network. Though the substantial growth in renewables demonstrates a clear appetite for
the global commitment to hit eco targets, this must be balanced with managing
Satellite IoT (satIoT) modules typically use different communication protocols economic investment. Given that many of these costs can be mitigated with
and hardware interfaces than traditional IoT devices.Therefore, ensuring reliable monitoring and control, preventative maintenance, especially for devices
the selected modules are compatible with existing hardware and software in hard-to-reach areas; it’s no great surprise that satIoT is becoming increasingly
infrastructures are extremely important. Selecting modules that support the popular within the renewables sector.
communication protocols and physical interfaces required by your network is a
key to success. Ultimately, the renewables industry has had to cope with managing remote and
harsh environments for many years and has done so adeptly, evolving with the
In addition, satIoT modules may require different power management strategies, technology to support remote management. There will always be challenges
due to their reliance on satellite connectivity and potentially, long battery life of course, but with satellite, issues associated with operation visibility and
requirements. Modules that are designed to operate efficiently in low-power control could be a thing of the past. With the availability of reliable connectivity
environments and able to implement power management strategies that minimize anywhere on the planet, renewables operators have the chance to turn what
power consumption and maximize battery life are also crucial selections. was once a major challenge into a cost saving and efficiency bearing advantage.
Connectors from Omnetics have been deployed on space missions ranging from Low Earth orbits to
deep space exploration. Designers can make the most of their PCB space with Omnetics’ extremely
small, rugged, and lightweight connectors and cable assemblies.
Even though we don’t think of the federal government as a manufacturer, The GAO notes that the term digital twins was actually coined by NASA
agencies from the Department of Defense (DoD) to DOE and beyond, build, engineers in the 1960s — they applied the concept by building physical and
deploy and manage some of the most expensive and complex vehicles, computational models of the Apollo 13 mission vehicles on the ground that were
machinery and equipment on the planet. adapted to match the vehicles’ changing conditions in space.
Because of this, digital twins presents an opportunity to streamline government It has taken more than 50 years to arrive at our current iteration of the term
operations and maintenance, making them more effective and efficient, as well as also digital twin, but similar to some of the most foundational technologies since the
enhancing and emboldening everything from national security to lifesaving discoveries. dawn of computing, the concept was born out of federal innovation.
Defining The Digital Twin + The Role In Government Digital Twins In Action
Taking a step back, to understand the meaning and components of this NASA is still engaging with digital twins, but in a much more complex way than
technology is quite instructive. Simply put, a digital twin is a computer- the agency did around Apollo 13. The space agency’s Michoud Assembly
generated, virtual representation of a physical object, process, or environment Facility in New Orleans manufactures and assembles critical hardware
that mirrors its real world counterpart as a way to predict future behavior. components for exploration vehicles under development.
Using technology such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), The engineers building and maintaining the processes for these mission-
a digital twin replicates everything about the physical asset, including all of its essential parts will use digital twins as a virtual walk through the facility. This
functionality and behavior, using smart sensors that collect real time data. These means employees will be able to work at the facility without physically being on
virtual representations can use that incoming information along with simulation site, while still being fed real time information.
and modeling technology to game out real world, operating scenarios.
Some of the goals with the digital twin work for NASA are to improve the
Integrating any flow of changing information that changes in the physical efficiency and quality of maintaining the facility and managing the needs of the
twin will automatically update the digital twin. Because of that process, NASA program. This should ultimately lead to decreased downtimes, improved
organizations can interact with the model to monitor changes and predict communication and decreased costs. To that end, the agency is equipping the
future events. Michoud-specific digital twin with some futuristic capabilities, including:
Like most emerging technologies, the evolution of digital twins has been • Interactive holographic models and AI generated asset placements
innovated and iterated in the private sector. However, the federal government based on historical movements of the assets.
isn’t lagging far behind.
• Simulating complex crane lifts or asset moves across the factory.
SILICON WEEK
SPACE VALLEY SPACE WEEK: PART I
SATELLITE
INNOVATION
THE MEETING PLACE FOR SATELLITE INDUSTRY LEADERS
Featured Speakers
Marc Bell
Steve Jurvetson Jessica Rosenworcel Ken Peterman Executive Chairman and
Co Founder Chairwoman Chairman & CEO
Co-Founder
Future Ventures FCC Commission Comtech Terran Orbital
SATINNOVATION.COM
OCTOBER 17 - 18, 2023
SILICON VALLEY
SILICON WEEK
SPACE VALLEY SPACE WEEK: PART II
2023 MILSAT
SYMPOSIUM
NEXT-GENERATION SPACE DEFENSE
Featured Speakers
Lt. Gen. Michael Guetlein Dr. Derek M. Tournear Dr. Claire Leon Brig. Gen. Steven Butow
Commander, Space Director Director, Space Systems Integration
Space Portfolio Director
Systems Command Space Development Office, Space Systems Command
Defense Innovation
U.S. Space Force Agency (SDA) U.S. Space Force Unit - DIU
As the second of two panel discussions at Inmarsat’s Shaping Connected Lynn Loo opened proceedings by explaining that GCMD, as a “neutral
Future Seminar during this year’s Singapore Maritime Week, Sustainability: convenor,” can add value in particularly complex pilots and trials by “bringing
Delivering Change explored how the maritime industry could enable high- people across the sector together to collaborate.”
value connected solutions to address its environmental challenges.
As an example, she pointed to GCMD’s
carbon capture pilot, which, unlike most
comparable trials, covers the initial capture
of carbon dioxide as well as its offloading
and recycling. Various stakeholders are
involved in the project — including LR as
the appointed classification society — and
this level of collaboration, Loo explained,
will be vital to creating “end-to-end
solutions” for maritime decarbonization.
Reiterating the importance of collaboration,
BHP’s Sarah Greenough said, “Industry
forums and consortiums provide the
opportunity to bring together a cross
section of the industry —– vessel owners,
fuel providers, class and charterers — and
that’s how we will achieve rapid change.
It is equally important that we rethink our
relationships in the ecosystem so that
competitors become partners in developing
green corridors and aggregating demand to
Moderated by Chakib Abi-Saab, Chief Technology and Innovation Officer at influence the industry at a much faster rate.”
Lloyd’s Register (LR), the discussion drew on the insight of panellists Elisa
Woodward, Chief Operations Officer, Vallianz Holdings; Lynn Loo, Chief Expanding on Greenough’s point, Elisa Woodward of Vallianz described
Executive Officer, Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD); “non-equity partnerships” as a vital element in realising environmental
and Sarah Greenough, Head of Maritime Sustainability and Supply Chain ambitions. “To achieve your decarbonisation goals, you need to look across
Excellence, BHP. the ecosystem to find the right partners – because there’s no way you can do it
by yourself. Commercially, it’s just too difficult. Collaboration is key to making
things happen.”
“What we found is that the pain points for the frontrunners differ from those of
the conservatives,” she explained. “The frontrunners worry about technological
uncertainty and commercial viability, but the conservatives haven’t even
established a decarbonisation strategy or division, meaning education and
contextualisation are crucial for this group.”
The size and complexity of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) SATCOM constellations The vision at the heart of all mega-constellation systems is a Very Wide Area
introduces substantial new challenges for network traffic engineering. As Network (VWAN) with low latency that can outcompete land-based fiber systems.
the number of companies offering low latency SATCOM connectivity via
LEO increases in number, the cost and performance will be key to achieving One area where mega-constellation systems shine in comparison to
market share. Earth-based competition is delivering lower latency and higher throughput
communications over long distances with fewer gateways. Optimizing the
Delivering the best service to customers in this increasingly competitive network routing to reduce the number of gateways used substantially drives
marketplace is driving operators to consider new technologies to scale-up down the total cost of system ownership.
capacity while ensuring service performance and controlling expenditure
Managing a LEO SATCOM network is challenging because of the continually Delivering an efficient service over long distances requires a routing concept
changing network geometry that is unlike anything found closer to the ground. that manages multi-orbit meshed networks with no prior knowledge of the
traffic profile. Using traditional Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing to, for
Historically, LEO networks have reduced management complexity by reducing example, send a message from London to New York always privileges the same
network flexibility and over-allocating capacity. Finding a way to make the connection path crossing the Atlantic, thereby creating congestion bottlenecks
complexity manageable, while fully exploiting the network capabilities, allows and neglecting other potentially available links.
operators to simultaneously increase capacity and performance.
The dynamic nature of these links is also quite challenging for traditional
To address this challenge, CGI has collaborated with TESAT-Spacecom, a routing algorithms to manage. Heuristics such as the Dijkstra or Bellman-Ford
renowned leader in telecommunication payloads and laser communications, algorithms only work with a network as it is now; if conditions change due
and has developed the Dynamic Predictive Routing (DPR) network traffic to delay or fault, then the entire routing table must be recalculated and the
engineering solution. forwarding elements updated, adding overhead and delay which accumulate in
a negative feedback cycle.
Built for the next-generations of mega-constellations, DPR demonstrates
communications performance improvements by using a new type of Many operators choose to solve this problem by modifying their chosen routing
networking solution which is proven on space-qualified hardware operating heuristic to accommodate these factors; mostly, this involves simply increasing
under realistic network conditions. the amount of raw compute used, either in terms of the number of factors being
considered or the frequency at which updated routing tables are generated.
DPR blends CGI’s comprehensive expertise in Artificial Intelligence
(AI) and leverages CGI’s Machine Learning (ML) accelerator platform Neither of these approaches is a cost-effective solution to the problem.
AccelerateAI360, and a 50 year history of delivering complex and Sustaining ever greater constellation numbers only increases the compute
successful projects and solutions within the European and North American demands and cost, so this is certainly not an effective way to compete in the
Aerospace markets. long term in what are increasingly established and highly efficient markets.
Delivering service operations using the trained model is low compute and
it remains stable for as long as the network is in a stable configuration. By
including realistic faults in the model training, CGI can also accommodate fault
scenarios without the need for retraining.
www.cgi.com/uk
→ easy re-configuration
→ vendor independent
The new sat-nms Monitoring & Control System is part of SES mPOWER
Satellite communication (SATCOM) is evolving at a rapid pace, with Moreover, SDRs facilitate the implementation of advanced signal processing
increasing demands for higher bandwidth and the need to accommodate a techniques to enhance high bandwidth and high channel count reception.
higher channel count impacting available SATCOM services. Techniques such as adaptive filtering, channel equalization, and error correction
can be implemented in software, allowing for efficient and real-time processing
Traditional hardware-based receivers often struggle to keep up with these of multiple signals.
requirements due to their limitations in scalability and flexibility. However,
Software-Defined Radios (SDRs) offer a game-changing solution by These techniques help mitigate the effects of fading, interference, and noise,
providing capabilities for high bandwidth and high channel count reception in resulting in improved reception quality and higher data throughput. SDR-
ground stations. There are many benefits that SDRs bring to operators in terms based ground stations can adaptively adjust their processing parameters
of high bandwidth and high channel count reception and this is revolutionizing based on the received signal characteristics, ensuring reliable reception even
satellite data reception. in challenging environments.
One of the primary advantages of SDRs is their ability to support high bandwidth Another key advantage of SDRs is their scalability. As SATCOM systems continue
reception. As the demand for faster data transfer rates continues to grow, traditional to evolve and new satellites are launched, the demands for higher bandwidth
hardware-based receivers face challenges in meeting these requirements. and increased channel count will only intensify. SDRs offer a scalable solution
that can easily accommodate future requirements through software upgrades
SDRs, on the other hand, can leverage their software-based processing and reconfigurations. This scalability eliminates the need for frequent hardware
capabilities to efficiently handle higher bandwidths. By employing parallel replacements, reducing costs and downtime for ground station operators.
processing techniques and optimized algorithms, SDR-based ground stations
can receive and process large amounts of data in real-time, enabling the Additionally, SDRs enable ground stations to stay up-to-date with the latest
reception of high-resolution satellite imagery, video streams and other data- satellite technologies and frequency allocations, ensuring compatibility with new
intensive applications with ease. satellite systems without requiring significant infrastructure changes.
Furthermore, SDRs excel in supporting a high channel count, allowing ground In terms of high bandwidth reception, SDRs leverage their wideband capabilities
stations to receive signals from multiple satellites simultaneously. Traditional to receive and process a broad range of frequencies simultaneously. They
hardware-based receivers often require separate hardware components for each can cover multiple frequency bands, such as L-, S-, C-, and Ku-band, without
channel, resulting in increased complexity and cost. the need for separate hardware for each band. This flexibility enables ground
stations to receive signals from different satellites operating on various
SDRs, with their inherent flexibility, can handle multiple channels through software frequency bands, expanding their access to satellite data sources.
configurations, eliminating the need for dedicated hardware for each channel.
This feature reduces costs as well as simplifies ground station operations, thereby When it comes to high channel count reception, SDRs offer the advantage of parallel
enabling the reception of data from diverse satellite constellations or multiple processing and multi-channel capabilities. Ground stations equipped with SDRs can
satellites that are operating on varying frequency bands. receive and process multiple channels simultaneously, allowing for the reception of
signals from multiple satellites or different transponders within the same satellite. This
The flexibility of SDRs also enable ground stations to adapt to different capability is particularly beneficial for applications such as Earth Observation (EO),
modulation schemes and frequency bands, further enhancing their high channel where data from multiple satellites or sensors need to be collected and processed
count capabilities. simultaneously for comprehensive analysis and monitoring.
Satellites employ various modulation schemes, such as QPSK, 8PSK, or QAM, Additionally, SDRs can employ advanced beamforming techniques to enhance
depending on the data rate and bandwidth requirements. Traditional hardware- reception performance in high channel count scenarios. By dynamically
based receivers often specialize in specific modulation schemes, making it adjusting the reception beam direction and focusing on the desired signals,
challenging to receive signals from satellites using different schemes. SDRs, SDR-based ground stations can improve the signal-to-noise ratio and minimize
with their software-defined nature, can dynamically switch between modulation interference from adjacent channels. This beamforming capability allows for
schemes and adapt to the specific requirements of each satellite, ensuring more robust and reliable reception of signals, especially in environments with
optimal reception performance across a wide range of satellites. high signal density or complex interference patterns.
www.pervices.com
An Alternative Software
Development Approach For
Evolving + Complex
Space Systems
Author: Dr. Peter Mendham, Chief Executive Officer, Bright Ascension
The Software Challenge
An increasing number of small satellite missions make use of multiple
spacecraft, usually through constellations with scheduled replenishment.
Each new addition to the system often involves the development of new The responsibility of connecting such a mixed system together is on the
mission capabilities or satellite platforms, making this process progressively software side. Even so, the current market does not offer an efficient end-to-end
more challenging to efficiently maintain and support these applications. technology for a growing satellite system. Numerous standalone products and
patchy solutions tend to be disjointed, fragmented and poorly integrated. This
Only a few years ago, space companies tended to be vertically integrated and results in significant costs, risks, delays to market and service delivery.
develop their technology in-house. However, as the New Space market has
matured, we have seen a significant surge in industry vendors and suppliers As an example, consider a typical mission where onboard software is developed
who specialize in specific parts of satellite manufacturing, launch and operations at roughly the same time as the rest of the spacecraft is getting built – e.g.,
and offer innovative engineering to the market. payload development, hardware specification and configuration. Sooner or later,
system requirements inevitably start to change and evolve
Cutting-edge and highly specialized technology, often at lower cost, was a
godsend for satellite owners and developers, but it also meant that many of This has a knock-on effect on the software infrastructure, including both the
them ended up managing numerous spacecraft with different capabilities, flight and the ground sides: onboard software, payload software, operations
different hardware systems or even from different manufacturers.Although software, or service delivery software, which may be developed by different
this may be a lucrative tactic from the cost point of view, the complexity of teams or even different vendors.
managing and operating such a constellation is a significant challenge.
50/80/100 W X-Band
The more complex the space system becomes as it scales up, the more
challenging it is to efficiently manage this constant process of change. Any
modification needs to be accounted for — not only during the development
stage, but also throughout the life on-orbit — as new satellites, capabilities,
and hardware are added to the fully functioning constellation.
An Alternative Approach
The Technical Solution You also discover brand new cutting-edge hardware technology that you
would like to try — even if that means a completely new OBS on your
The new product suite is based on Bright Ascension’s innovative and flight- spacecraft. Finally, you find out that some of the hardware you previously used
proven GenerationOne technology that is both modular and model-based. is discontinued and must be replaced. Typically, in order to implement these
Combined, these two elements create a powerful foundation for re-shaping the changes for your next mission you would need to start software development
traditional software development approach. from scratch and ensure it integrates into your fully functioning and operating
space system, which is a mammoth task in itself.
“Modular” aspect means that all products in the suite are based on reusable
components, designed to create limitless combinations of software units, like Bright Ascension’s new product suite will significantly simplify these processes.
constructing with building blocks. These components can be library-based, The modular structure of the software means that components written for one
available with the product, and cover any standard functionality. Or they can be spacecraft can be easily reused on another and combined in new ways to
completely bespoke, created for unique mission-specific capabilities. Combining achieve new functionality, so you do not have to start from the ground up and
components like building blocks means that any software package can be waste invaluable time, effort, and cost.
developed much quicker, with greater reliability and at a lower cost.
Once ready, the new software package needs to be integrated into your space
But it’s the “model-based” aspect of GenerationOne that really makes the new system. Being model-based, the constellation will automatically “see” the new
product suite stand out. The software generates a machine-readable overview additions and reflect them across the entire ground-space system with almost
of the system which automatically captures any change and shares it across the zero configuration on your part.
entire software infrastructure. For example, if there is any change on the flight
side – e.g., a software update or new hardware or even a new spacecraft – the Bright Ascension has completed the hard work for you. Their end-to-end
operations software can automatically “see” the new elements without the need product suite helps you get it right from the very beginning and create a
for manual configuration. software infrastructure that is easy to manage, scalable, future-proof and
designed to grow with your space system without unexpected surprises and
Real Mission Application unmitigated risks.
Let’s say you manage and develop a small constellation to provide The Next Steps
communication services or Earth Observation (EO) data to customers on the
Bright Ascension’s end-to-end software suite will contain 9 highly-integrated
products and will cover the entire end-to-end value chain – from developing,
testing, flying, and operating a spacecraft to managing system performance and
delivering space-based data to end users.
The early release of the first product in the suite is expected in October 2023
and Bright Ascension plans to release more information and reveal product
names, functionality and first screenshots at the Smallsat Conference in Logan,
Utah, in August.
brightascension.com
Dr. Peter
The Bright Ascension’s Team Mendham
Technology
Consulting
Market
Intelligence
Executive
Events and
Training
Get your
projects
off the
ground
euroconsult-ec.com
Author: Lalit Katare, Market Research Consultant, Allied Market Research
Satellite-Based Earth
Observation System
Analysis and Trends
Satellite-based Earth Observation (EO) is carried out with the aid of satellites The information collected through remote sensing is used for several
orbiting around the Earth to view, observe, identify environmental change, applications such as weather and terrain mapping, reconnaissance and
and formulate maps. This process uses remote sensing techniques to collect intelligence missions, agricultural monitoring and management, and synthetic
information on chemical, physical, and biological aspects of the Earth. aperture radar imagery. In addition, collected information is used by the defense
sector for border monitoring, disaster management as well as other, crucial
military missions.
High Performance
Space Ready Lenses
• Radiation resistant
• Athermalized
• Vacuum compatible
• Approved materials
WIDE OCT PORTFOLIO PARTS AGENCY PASSIVE PRODUCTS ACTIVE PRODUCTS DATALINK PRODUCTS
HIGH VOLUME PRODUCTION ROBOTIC MANUFACTURING INTEGRATION FACILITIES TESTING FACILITIES PCB PRODUCTION
Much has been said and written about 5G New Radio (5G NR). However, the
A New Level Of Interoperability
information is often delivered in contradictory terms as numerous trade media and
industry analysts offer their differing opinions on this subject. This tends to muddy By unifying 5G standardization of non-terrestrial and terrestrial technology,
the waters and makes it far harder to understand what 5G NR actually is, how it the barrier between different satellite systems will be eliminated, allowing end
works, what advantages the technology brings to the table, and — perhaps most users to roam freely between the terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks of
importantly — how 5G NR will affect mobile communication in the future. various operators.
Easier Said Than Done There are still technical challenges to overcome before seamless, non-terrestrial and
terrestrial network experiences can be achieved, but with the development of 3GPP
5G NR-compliant solutions, huge steps will be taken in the correct direction.
What may be simple to achieve in a terrestrial network can be extremely
complicated in a non-terrestrial network. For instance, how do you provide gatehousesatcom.com
direct-to-smartphone connectivity from a satellite constellation? This is a real
challenge due to factors such as access to spectrum, link budgets, high doppler
shifts, increase in latency due to interference from terrain, weather, and a range
of other factors known to disrupt wireless networks.
The efforts are worth the investment, as the value proposition of a 3GPP
standardized, 5G network is crystal clear: non-terrestrial networks can Thorleif Astrup Hallund has more than 25 years of experience
significantly strengthen the 5G experience, where terrestrial networks cannot — with product and business management in telecommunication
particularly regarding mobility and mission-critical communications. By doing companies and tech startups. Currently, he holds the position
so, non-terrestrial networks represent a golden opportunity to extend 5G service of Senior Business Development Director at Gatehouse
coverage of enormously large areas where traditional terrestrial networks have Satcom, spearheading business development with a particular
limited reach or cannot operate feasibly. focus on 5G products for non-terrestrial networks. Gatehouse
Satcom is a full member of 3GPP and actively contributing to
In addition, much of the new connectivity has been made possible by the launch
of new, Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. While LEO constellations are widely
regarded as the solution to shipping’s bandwidth concerns, further research is
needed to determine LEO network cyber-security strength as well as levels of
service and the back-up options available when data is fully consumed.
Against this background, shipowners require software tools that are not
only optimized for use at sea, but tools that provide protection of the data
and endpoints to ensure vessels are fully protected — without impacting on
business communications.
#APSCC2023
Phishing penetration test Half correctly identified the message as a phishing attempt
measures crew vigilance and ignored it, but half supplied the information asked for.
Of the latter group, in no case was the message escalated
to management for advice on how to proceed.
GTMaritime offers a penetration testing service free of
charge which allows customers to evaluate the ability of The 50-50 split certainly raised pulses at company
their personnel to identify phishing attacks headquarters, as the spoof email was written in poor
English and emanated from a mysteriously unnamed port
Hackers are constantly trying to come up with new ruses authority — both common traits that should ring alarm
to outwit software-based protections. For this reason, crew bells. To determine if the same result would be found if
cannot afford to become complacent in the belief that, with more detailed information was requested, a second test
a technological safety net in place, everything reaching was employed.
their inbox is trustworthy and can be taken at face value.
This time the message that supposedly came from a port
On the contrary, they must remain vigilant: the few malicious authority had a personalised subject line that mentioned
messages that do arrive will more likely resemble an the target vessel’s name and IMO number. There is
authentic request or employ advanced social-engineering mounting evidence of cyber criminals including references
techniques, which make them harder to recognize. to familiar people or organisations, adding a veneer of
authenticity that encourages the targeted recipient to lower
Quality ship operators understand this and take a holistic their guard. The rogue message then asked for a host of
approach to cyber defence. To supplement the work done sensitive particulars and security details, which if passed on
by technological tools such as GTMailPlus by GTMaritime, to pirates could jeopardise the safety of vessel and crew.
they routinely remind staff to stay alert and offer training on
what to look out for. The response showed a marked improvement over the first
test. Eight recipients immediately detected something was
However, it can be difficult to gauge exactly how well amiss and ignored the request. Encouragingly, three were
these measures are working or to identify areas that would suspicious enough to seek guidance from head office.
benefit from improvement. In the same way that cyber Although head office personnel were kept in the dark about
criminals are constantly refining their techniques, ship the test, they reacted correctly, advising vessels not to
operators too must continually adapt. send any data and also alerted the IT department.
GTMaritime includes a free phishing penetration test as Even so, five vessels still obligingly followed the
part of their service to customers. These realistic but instructions in the message without properly considering
ultimately harmless simulated attacks offer an effective way either the safety or commercial ramifications of sensitive
of gathering quantitative evidence on the alertness of the information falling into the wrong hands.
frontline staff most exposed to hoax emails.
Path to enhanced education and procedures
By revealing weaknesses in training provision, the free
service allows customers to pinpoint where educational Following the penetration tests GTMaritime supplied the
resources can be enhanced or redirected, knowledge gaps vessel operator with educational materials for both staff
plugged and awareness raised. and IT personnel. The operator took an enlightened view to
the results, seeing them as an opportunity to learn rather
Test results revealed weaknesses than apportion blame. It later shared the full findings in
a company-wide security bulletin in the hope that using
GTMaritime recently completed a two-round penetration real data rather than hypothetical scenarios to present the
test for an established shipping company. For the initial dangers would drive home the need for vigilance.
test the vessel operator sent to 16 of its captains a
spoof message appearing to come from a Port Authority GTMaritime believes that technological and human
requesting basic identifying information about the vessel components are equally important in developing cyber-
and its owner. resilience. While customers can rely on GTMartime to
handle the technical defences, the exercise described above
plainly demonstrates the usefulness of penetration testing in
bringing to light and addressing the human-element.