Jana 2007
Jana 2007
Jana 2007
A complex moiety containing copper (II) has been anchored covalently into the organic-modified Si-MCM-41
to prepare a new catalyst. The amine group containing organic moiety 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane has been first
anchored on the surface of Si-MCM-41 via silicon alkoxide route. The amine group upon condensation with salicyldehyde
affords a bidentate ligand in the mesoporous matrix for anchoring copper(II) ions. The prepared catalyst has been
characterized by UV-vis, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and infrared (IR) spectroscopic analysis, small-
angle X-ray diffraction, and N2 sorption study. A remarkable difference in the pore structure has been observed after
the immobilization of copper(II) complex in Si-MCM-41. The catalyst showed excellent catalytic efficiency in
epoxidation reactions with various olefinic compounds including styrene and allyl alcohol, using tert-BuOOH as
oxidant. Notably, styrene shows unprecedented high conversion (97%) as well as epoxide selectivity (89%) with
tert-BuOOH over the Cu-MCM-41 catalyst.
a
Benzaldehyde. b 2-Cyclohexen-1-ol was formed. c exo-Epoxynorbornane. d R-(+)-glycidol. e Turn over frequency ) moles converted/mol of
active site/time. The products of the epoxidation reactions were collected at different time intervals and were identified and quantified by Varian
CP-3800 gas chromatograph equipped with an FID detector and a CP-Sil 8 CB capillary column. f Reaction conditions: alkenes (1 g); catalyst (50
mg); tert-BuOOH (2 mL); acetonitrile (8 mL).
Table 3. Epoxidation of Styrene with Various Oxidants Over Catalytic Reactions. The catalytic reactions were carried out in
the Cu-MCM-41 a glass batch reactor according to following procedure. Substrate,
oxidant styrene conversion (wt %) % yield of epoxide solvent, and catalysts were first mixed. The mixture was then
equilibrated to 80 °C in an oil bath. After addition of oxidant, the
none 0 reaction was stirred continuously. The products of the epoxidation
H2O2 34 6 reactions were collected at different time intervals and were identified
tert-BuOOH 97 86
and quantified by gas chromatography.
PhIO 15 10
and for C:Cu ≈ 18.5, which indicates that the copper(II) ions have Results and Discussion
N2O2 ligand environment as shown in Scheme 1. Spectroscopic Measurements. Comparison of IR spectra of
Catalyst Characterization. Infrared and electronic spectra were
measured on Shimadzu S-8400 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
Si-MCM-41 and MCM-41-(SiCH2CH2CH2NH2)x shows the
spectrometer and Shimadzu CP-3101 UV-vis spectrophotometer, presence of various N-H and C-H vibration bands in the 3100-
respectively. The copper content of the sample was estimated on 2800 cm-1 and 1550-1250 cm-1 region in the IR spectra of
a Varian Techtron AA-ABQ atomic absorption spectrometer. MCM-41-(SiCH2CH2CH2NH2)x that are absent in the case of
Elemental analysis, for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen (CHN), was Si-MCM-41 (Figure 1). This clearly indicates that 3-APTES
undertaken on a Perkin-Elmer 240C elemental analyzer. Electron has been anchored into the Si-MCM-41 matrix. The characteristic
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were measured on a Varian band for azomethine group of copper(II) complex moiety appears
E-112 spectrometer at room temperature. The powder X-ray at ca. 1626 cm-1 in the IR spectra of Cu-MCM-41. The IR band
diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded with a of free azomethine group appears at 1643 cm-1 while in Cu-
Scintag XDS-2000 diffractometer using Cu KR radiation. N2 sorption MCM-41 this band is shifted to a lower frequency indicating
studies were undertaken using Quantachrome Autosorb Automated
Gas Sorption system. Prior to sorption experiments, samples were
coordination of azomethine nitrogen with copper.15
outgassed at desired temperature (250 °C for Si-MCM-41 and 90 The solid-state electronic spectra of the species Cu-MCM-
°C for Cu-MCM-41) for ca. 8-9 h under vacuum (10-3 Torr). 41 showed two absorption maxima at ca. 650 and 400 nm. A
Other instruments used in this study were the same as reported
earlier.6b,6c (15) Bhadbhade, M. M.; Srinivas, D. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 5458 and 6122.
Anchoring of Copper Complex in MCM-41 Matrix Langmuir, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2007 2495
of styrene with tert-BuOOH over a variety of catalysts under styrene in heterogeneous condition has been studied. The results
heterogeneous condition has been studied in the recent past (Table of this study are given in Table 3. tert-BuOOH is the best oxidant
2). Seelan et al. studied epoxidation of styrene over copper- among the three catalysts that were used in catalytic epoxidation
phthalocyanine immobilized NaY catalyst which shows over reaction in the present study. Oxidants like H2O2 and PhIO are
95% conversion with epoxide selectivity ∼24%.23 Selectivity of clearly less efficient than tert-BuOOH as is evident from the
the epoxide improves (∼53%) when copper-perchloro-phtha- percentage of conversion of styrene. To test if the copper is
locyanine has been anchored onto MCM-41, however, conversion leaching out from the catalyst during reaction, the reaction mixture
remains within 47%.24 Gold particles dispersed on metal oxides was filtered out hot after the reaction is over and was subjected
have also been used as catalysts in styrene epoxidation reaction to atomic absorption spectroscopic analysis. The analyses show
that gives a yield of ca. 60%, with a 94% epoxide selectivity.25 copper was absent in the filtrate. Besides, filtered mixture also
Recently, Tang et al. have studied this reaction over Co-NaX/ did not show any catalytic activity toward epoxidation reactions.
Co-MCM-41 using tert-BuOOH as well as molecular oxygen Therefore, it is clear that copper is not leaching out from the
as oxidant.26 Molecular oxygen is the better oxidant than tert- catalyst during epoxidation.
BuOOH in this case, and yet conversion remained below 45%. The Cu-MCM-41 catalyst has been recovered from reaction
In fact, in the epoxidation of styrene with tert-BuOOH over mixture and has been reused successively three times under the
copper/copper complex immobilized zeolite or molecular-sieves same reaction conditions. The solid catalyst has been recovered
catalysts, epoxide selectivity rarely goes above 40%.27 by filtration after each reaction and has been washed thoroughly
The heterogeneous oxidation of cyclohexene (Table 1) first with acetonitrile and then with dichloromethane. The
proceeded smoothly, showing an excellent conversion ∼94% to recovered catalyst is found to exhibit almost the same catalytic
form cyclohexene oxide as the major product with 83% selectivity; activity for styrene epoxidation reaction by tert-BuOOH in every
along with this, 2-cyclohexen-1-ol was also generated owing to run: first run, styrene conversion ) 97%, turnover ) 2963;
allylic C-H oxidation. A 50-60% conversion of cyclohexene second run, styrene conversion ) 96%, turnover ) 2969; third
with 77% epoxide selectivity has been obtained using Co/Mn run, styrene conversion ) 97%, turnover ) 2957. No induction
containing aluminophosphate (AlPO-36) catalysts.28 Molecular period was observed in all the reactions (Figure 5).
oxygen with sacrificial benzaldehyde has been used as oxidant.
Using the same oxidant with sacrificial isobutyraldehyde copper- Conclusions
perchlorophthalocyanine-MCM-41 yields 80% of cyclohexene- In summary, we have successfully anchored the copper(II)
epoxide with 95% selectivity.24 Bulkier cycloalkenes such as Schiff base complex into Si-MCM-41 matrix via covalent bond.
norbornene and cyclooctene (Table 1) have also been effectively A remarkable difference in the pore structure has been observed
converted to selectively exo-epoxynorbornane (conversion 97%, after the immobilization of copper(II) complex in Si-MCM-41.
selectivity 100%) and cyclooctene oxide (conversion 90%, The Cu-MCM-41 is porous but the mesoporous character of
selectivity 100%), respectively, while these two cycloalkenes Si-MCM-41 was not retained after modification. The catalyst
are poor substrates for the ruthenium-dichlorophenylporphyrin- Cu-MCM-41 has shown excellent catalytic activities in ep-
MCM-4113 or TS-1 catalyzed epoxidation.29 Allyl alcohol gives oxidation reaction toward various olefins including allylic alcohol.
selectively R-(+)-glycidol (conversion 73%) as epoxide under An unprecedented high conversion (97%) as well as selectivity
the present heterogeneous catalytic conditions. of epoxide (89%) has been observed in styrene epoxidation.
Even though copper(II) Schiff base complexes have been well- Notably, epoxidation of allylic alcohol showed considerably high
known for a long time, they have scarcely been used as turnover frequency (166 h-1) in this study. The coordination
homogeneous catalyst in olefin epoxidation reactions. Das et al. environment around copper(II) in Cu-MCM-41 is less crowded
have obtained a moderate yield of olefinic epoxide using copper- and is easily approachable in comparison to the bulkier metal-
(II) Schiff base complex as catalyst in the presence of 2-me- porphyrins or metal-phthalocyanins, which were anchored into
thylpropanal and molecular oxygen in homogeneous conditions.30a MCM-41 matrix in the earlier studies. Probably because of this,
A maximum yield of ca. 15% of styrene-epoxide has been alkyl-hydroperoxide gets enough space to bind copper in the
achieved with iodosylbenzene using a variety of tetradentate intermediate stages of catalytic cycle and thereby facilitates the
Schiff base copper complexes.30b neucleophilic attack by the oxidant to enhance the catalytic activity
The efficacy of the different oxidants like tert-BuOOH, H2O2, of the metal complex anchored into mesoporous matrix in the
and PhIO in Cu-MCM-41 catalyzed epoxidation reaction of epoxidation reactions. Hence, a better catalytic efficiency has
been observed in Cu-MCM-41.
(23) Seelan, S.; Sinha, A. K.; Srinivas, D.; Sivasanker, S. J. Mol. Catal. A
2000, 157, 163.
(24) Karandikar, P.; Agashe, M.; Vijayamohanan, K.; Chandwadkar, A.
Acknowledgment. Financial support from the Department
J. Appl. Catal. A 2004, 257, 133. of Science and Technology, Government of India, by a grant
(25) Patila, N. S.; Jha, R.; Uphade, B. S.; Bhargava, S. K.; Choudhary, V. R. (SR/S1/IC-12/2003) (to S.K.) is gratefully acknowledged. R.B.
Appl. Catal. A 2004, 275, 87. thanks CSIR and B.D. thanks UGC for research fellowship. We
(26) Tang, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, H.; Wang, Y. J. Catal. 2005, 230, 384.
(27) De Vos, D. E.; Dams, M.; Sels, B. F.; Jacobs, P. A. Chem. ReV. 2002, are grateful to SAIF, IIT Madras for EPR spectral measurement.
102, 3615. Authors wish to thank Dr. A. Bhaumik for N2 sorption analysis,
(28) Raja, R.; Sankar, G.; Thomas, J. M. Chem. Commun. 1999, 829. funded by the NanoScience and Technology Initiative of DST,
(29) Murugavel, R.; Roesky, H. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
477. New Delhi (on a chargeable basis). We are indebted to the referees
(30) (a) Das, G.; Shukla, R.; Mandal, S.; Singh, R.; Bharadwaj, P. K.; Hall, for their valuable comments.
J. van; Whitmire, K. H. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 323. (b) Zolezzi, S.; Spodine,
E.; Decinti, A. Polyhedron 2003, 22, 1653. LA062409T