In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma Spp. Against Fungal Pathogens Causing Black Point Disease of Wheat q1
In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma Spp. Against Fungal Pathogens Causing Black Point Disease of Wheat q1
In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma Spp. Against Fungal Pathogens Causing Black Point Disease of Wheat q1
To cite this article: Mohamed Taha Yassin, Ashraf Abdel-Fattah Mostafa & Abdulaziz
Abdulrahman Al-Askar (2022) In vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. against fungal
pathogens causing black point disease of wheat, Journal of Taibah University for Science, 16:1,
57-65, DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2022.2029327
RESEARCH ARTICLE
CONTACT Mohamed Taha Yassin [email protected] Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 2455,
Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
58 M. T. YASSIN ET AL.
(A. alternata, B. sorokiniana, D. halodes and F. prolifera- that may hinder membrane sterilization. Finally, the
tum) which cause black point disease of wheat. filtrates were sterilized using Millipore filters (22 µm).
PDA medium supplemented with 25% Trichoderma spp.
2. Materials and methods filtrates was poured in sterile Petri dishes and inocu-
lated with 6 mm mycelial discs of the phytopathogenic
2.1. Plant fungal pathogens and antagonistic fungal strains. The control plates were inoculated with
strains 6 mm mycelial discs of different fungal pathogens. The
The four phytopathogenic fungal strains (Fusarium pro- plates were then incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 5 days. The
liferatum ATCC 74149, Alternaria alternata ATCC 66981, radial growth diameters of the phytopathogens were
Bipolaris sorokiniana ATCC 32093, Drechslera halodes then measured using a Vernier calliper. The inhibition
ATCC 32198) and two Trichoderma spp. (Trichoderma of mycelial growth index (IMG %) was calculated using
viride ATCC 18652 and Trichoderma harzianum ATCC the following formula:
48131) were obtained from the Botany and Microbi-
Inhibition % = (A–B)/A × 100,
ology Department, College of Science, King Saud Uni-
versity. The fungal strains were subcultured on potato where A = radial growth diameter of the phytopatho
dextrose agar (PDA) slants, incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 5 gens in the control plates, B = radial growth diameter
days and finally stored in the refrigerator at 4°C until of the phytopathogens in the treated plates [20].
further use.
The percentage of growth inhibition (%) of the phy- where A = growth diameter in the control plates,
topathogenic fungal strains by the Trichoderma filtrates B = growth diameter in the treated plates [19].
was evaluated. The two antagonistic fungal strains were
grown in 50 mL of potato dextrose broth and incu-
2.6. Preparation of Trichoderma spp. crude
bated at 25 ± 2°C for 7 days in an orbital shaker at
extracts
150 rpm. Cell-free filtrates were obtained via filtration
using double layers of muslin followed by centrifuga- The ability of Trichoderma strains to produce active
tion at 9000 rpm for 10 min to remove the fungal spores metabolites which exhibit antifungal activity against
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 59
fungal strains causing black point disease of wheat was achieved by comparison of their mass spectrum with
investigated. The Trichoderma isolates were cultured reference standards in NIST database.
onto PDA medium and incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 7 days.
The fungal growth was then scraped from the agar 2.9. Statistical analysis
surface to obtain a mycelial sample of 5 g. Then, the
mycelial growth was added to 200 mL of 80% ethanol Data were statistically analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5.0
supplemented with 0.2 M HCl and incubated in a rota- (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) using one-
tory shaker at 25 ± 2°C for 24 h. The samples were then way analysis of variance. The experiments were done
centrifuged at 9000 rpm to separate the solid compo- in triplicates and the data were presented as a mean of
nents. The extraction procedure was performed again triplicates ± standard error.
for the solid components, using ethyl acetate as a sol-
vent. Finally, the extracts were combined and partially 3. Results
evaporated using a rotatory evaporator. The yield was
calculated using the following equation: 3.1. Antagonistic antifungal activity of
Trichoderma strains
Extract Yield % = (R/S) × 100, Dual culture results showed that both T. viride and T.
harzianum strains limited the growth of different fun-
where R = extract residue, S = weight of the raw gal phytopathogens with different growth inhibition
mycelial sample [22]. patterns as shown in Figure 1. T. viride strain showed
the highest antagonistic activity against different phy-
2.7. Antifungal efficacy of Trichoderma spp. topathogenic fungal strains compared to T. harzianum
extracts against fungal pathogens strain. Alternaria alternata was the most susceptible
strain to the concerned antagonistic fungal strains (T.
The disc diffusion method was used to evaluate the viride and T. harzianum) recording inhibition percent-
antifungal activity of Trichoderma spp. extracts against ages of 75.04 and 67.83%, respectively (Table 1). In con-
phytopathogenic fungi which cause black point disease trast, the lowest antagonistic activities of T. viride and
of wheat. Fifteen mL of PDA medium was poured in ster- T. harzianum strains were estimated against D. halodes
ile Petri dishes as a basal medium, followed by 10 mL recording growth inhibition percentages of 51.54 and
of seeded medium previously inoculated with a suspen- 43.92%, respectively. Furthermore, the results revealed
sion of spores from the fungal phytopathogens tested. that T. viride exerted antagonistic action against B.
Then, filter paper discs (8 mm diameter) were loaded sorokiniana and F. proliferatum with growth inhibition
with different concentrations of Trichoderma spp. crude percentages of 62.65 and 64.23%, while T. harzianum
extracts (50, 100, 150, 250, 300 and 400 µg/disc) and showed inhibition percentages of 59.04 and 53.42%,
placed over the seeded plates [19]. Filter paper discs respectively.
with 25 µg of fluconazole, a reference antifungal agent,
were used as positive controls. The plates were then
incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 5 days. The diameters of the 3.2. Antifungal potency of culture filtrates of
inhibition zones were measured using a Vernier cal- concerned antagonistic fungi
liper and the lowest concentration of Trichoderma spp. Cultural filtrates of the antagonistic fungal strains (T.
extract which exhibited an inhibitory effect against the harzianum and T. viride) exhibited antifungal potency
phytopathogens tested was considered the minimum against different pathogenic fungal strains. T. viride fil-
inhibitory concentration (MIC). The minimum fungici- trates demonstrated the maximum growth inhibition
dal concentration (MFC) was obtained by plating an against B. sorokiniana (57.97%) followed by D. halodes
inoculum from the inhibition zones into freshly pre- (42.90%), A. alternata (30.46%) and F. proliferatum
pared PDA medium. The lowest concentration with no (19.02%). On the other hand, the cultural filtrates of T.
fungal growth was considered the MFC. harzianum exhibited the highest anti-phytopathogenic
activity against B. sorokiniana followed by D. halodes,
2.8. GC-MS analysis of the T. viride and T. A. alternata and F. proliferatum recording growth inhi-
harzianum extracts bition percentages of 53.06, 40.81, 28.72 and 6.97%,
respectively, as seen in Table 2.
Chemical analyses of T. harzianum and T. viride extracts
were achieved to detect the active constituents exhibit-
3.3. Slide culture technique to detect
ing antifungal activity. GC-MS was performed using an
mycoparasitism relationship
Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph and an Agilent 5975C
Mass Spectrometer, USA. Conditions of analysis were T. harzianum strain exhibited mycoparasitism against
optimized as stated by Yassin et al. 23 [23]. Identifica- the tested phytopathogenic fungal isolates except D.
tion of active components of Trichoderma extracts was halodes strain, while T. viride showed no mycoparasitic
60 M. T. YASSIN ET AL.
Figure 1. Antagonistic activity of T. viride and T. harzianum strains against different phytopathogenic strains.
Table 1. Antagonistic activity of T. harzianum and T. viride against the concerned fungal phytopathogens. (T.h, T. harzianum; T.v, T.
viride).
Mean diameter of mycelial growth of Percentage of mycelial growth
phytopathogens (mm) inhibition (%)
Table 2. Inhibitory effect of the culture filtrates of antagonistic strains (T. harzianum and
T. viride) against wheat fungal phytopathogens.
Mean diameter of mycelial
growth of phytopathogens IMG %
action. The antagonistic T. harzianum isolate exhibited exhibited carbendazim resistance. Furthermore, car-
parasitic action against A. alternata, B. sorokiniana and bendazim was moderately effective against B. sorokini-
F. proliferatum strains through different mechanisms of ana strain with inhibition percentage of 69.08% at
action as seen in Figure 2. The mycoparasitic behaviour 1.00 ppm concentration. In addition, the MIC of car-
included coiling of Trichoderma hyphae around the phy- bendazim against B. sorokiniana was 0.50 ppm and the
topathogenic hyphae, formation of penetration peg mycelial growth was completely suppressed at MFC of
and disintegration of pathogenic hyphae. 2.00 ppm (Table 3).
3.4. Fungicidal activity of carbendazim (reference 3.5. Antifungal efficacy of Trichoderma spp.
fungicide) extracts against fungal pathogens using disc
diffusion method
Carbendazim as a reference fungicide showed highly
fungicidal activity against F. proliferatum strain at all T. viride extract exerted the highest antifungal activity
tested concentrations, while D. halodes and A. alternata against different phytopathogenic strains compared to
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 61
Table 3. Effect of different concentrations of fungicide (carbendazim) on mycelial growth of wheat phytopathogenic fungi. (A. a,
Alternaria alternata; B.s, Bipolaris sorokiniana; D. h, Drechslera halodes; F. p, Fusarium proliferatum).
Percentage of mycelial growth
Mean diameter of mycelial growth (mm) inhibition (%)
T. harzianum extract. B. sorokiniana was the most sensi- 1-hexadecanol (6.45%), isopentyl acetate (4.65%),
tive strain to T. harzianum and T. viride extracts record- dioctyl ester, hexanedioic acid (4.24%) and 9-eicosane
ing suppressive zone diameters of 11.36 and 12.29 mm, (2.23%) as demonstrated in Table 5. In contrast, the
respectively at a concentration of 200 µg/disc as seen major active component of T. viride was cyclooc-
in Table 4. In contrast, A. alternata exhibited the low- tanol (32.74%) followed by propyl-benzene (21.65%),
est susceptibility to T. harzianum and T. viride strains cadinene (11.23%), epizonaren (9.34%), d- limonene
with MIC values of 300 µg/disc, respectively. The MFC (8.49%), α-bisabolol (7.32%), β-farnesene (6.78%) and
of T. viride extract against different phytopathogenic propanoic acid (2.45%) as seen in Table 6.
strains was 300 µg/disc. Moreover, T. harzianum extract
showed fungicidal activity against B. sorokiniana and
D. halodes with MFC value of 300 µg/disc, while it was 4. Discussion
400 µg/disc against A. alternata and D. halodes strains.
Trichoderma spp. showed a potential biocontrol effi-
ciency against fungal phytopathogens either through
direct mechanisms of mycoparasitism and antibiosis or
3.6. GC-MS analysis of the T. viride and T.
by indirect mechanisms as competition for nutrients,
harzianum extracts
enhancing plant defence responses and exhilarating
GS-MS of T. viride and T. harzianum was performed plant growth [24]. In this regard, Trichoderma bioagents
to detect different active ingredients exhibiting anti- suppress the growth of fungal phytopathogens by a
phytopathogenic activity. 6-pentyl-α-pyrone (26.43%) mixed action through their metabolites inhibitory effect
was the predominant active component of T. harzianum and lytic enzymes which disintegrate the fungal cell wall
extract followed by hexadecanoic acid (15.98%), acetic [25]. Trichoderma spp. have been ascertained as bio-
acid (12.84%), 2-phenylethyl alcohol (11.36%), 2-butox logical control agents against several phytopathogenic
yethyl acetate (8.53%), 1-methoy-2-propanone (7.29%), fungal strains [26]. The current study confirmed the
62 M. T. YASSIN ET AL.
Table 4. Antifungal activity of T. viride and T. harzianum extracts against different phytopathogenic fungal strains.
Inhibition zone diameter of fungal strains (mm)
Treatment Concn (μg/disc) Fungal pathogens 100 μg/disc 200 μg/disc 300 μg/disc 400 μg/disc FCZ (25 μg/disc)
(T. h) extract A. a 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 10.57 ± 0.34 11.56 ± 0.51 15.27 ± 0.18
B. s 0.00 ± 0.00 11.36 ± 0.67 13.06 ± 0.23 15.43 ± 0.29 20.56 ± 0.19
D. h 0.00 ± 0.00 10.21 ± 0.00 12.56 ± 0.56 14.21 ± 0.32 18.48 ± 0.51
F. p 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 11.23 ± 0.37 12.23 ± 0.12 16.23 ± 0.38
(T. v) extract A. a 0.00 ± 0.00 9.78 ± 0.54 11.26 ± 0.65 13.43 ± 0.11 15.54 ± 0. 23
B. s 0.00 ± 0.00 12.29 ± 0.09 14.69 ± 0.24 16.62 ± 0.64 19.78 ± 0.35
D. h 0.00 ± 0.00 11.89 ± 0.26 13.42 ± 0.49 15.76 ± 0.59 18.65 ± 0.17
F. p 0.00 ± 0.00 10.34 ± 0.73 12.46 ± 0.33 13.29 ± 0.41 16.81 ± 0.06
potent activity of T. viride and T. harzianum against fun- resulting in suppression of the competitive microorgan-
gal pathogenic strains causing black point disease of isms [28].
wheat. Dual cultural assay indicated that T. viride strain In contrast, resistance of A. alternata and D. halodes
exerted the highest antagonistic potency against A. to carbendazim fungicide was detected in the current
alternata (75.04%) followed by F. proliferatum (64.23%), study at different concentrations. The previous result
B. sorokiniana (62.65%) and D. halodes (51.54%), while was coincident with that of Yang et al., 31 who reported
T. harzianum exhibited a moderate efficacy against A. the resistance of A. alternata to a number of agricultural
alternata followed by B. sorokiniana, F. proliferatum and fungicides [31]. The development of fungicides resis-
D. halodes with corresponding inhibition percentages tance may be due to alteration of fungicides target sites
of 67.83%, 59.04%, 53.42% and 43.92%, respectively. in fungal cell or to the fungal enzymatic breakdown of
The proved antagonistic efficacies of T. viride and T. these fungicides [32].
harzianum against fungal strains causing black point In our current study, T. harzianum exhibited myco-
disease were coincident with that reported by Ghor- parasitism against A. alternata, F. proliferatum and
banpour et al., 17 and Adnan et al., 27 [27,28]. More- B. sorokiniana, while no mycoparasitic action was
over, the metabolites produced by Trichoderma spp. detected against D. halodes. In this regard, the myco-
may play a major role in suppressing the growth of phy- parasitic activity of T. harzianum against B. sorokiniana
topathogenic fungi as the hyphae of pathogens obvi- was demonstrated by coiling of the Trichoderma hyphae
ously collapsed between the interaction zones as clearly around the hyphae of pathogenic fungus. Furthermore,
presented by dual culture assay. Several researchers hyphal penetration of T. harzianum into A. alternata,
attributed the formation of clear interaction zone of B. sorokiniana and F. proliferatum hyphae was proven
hypha disappearance of pathogenic fungi to the action as another mycoparasitic mode of action [33,34]. On
of secondary metabolites as gliotoxin produced by Tri- the other hand, the mycoparasitic action may be pow-
choderma spp which was believed to play an important ered by number of extracellular enzymes that disinte-
role in the antibiosis process [29,30]. On the other hand, grate fungal hyphae of phytopathogenic fungi as chiti-
the potent biological activities of Trichoderma strains nases and cellulases facilitating hyphal penetration of
may be also assigned to their high colonization rates Trichoderma bioagents [35,36]. The same explanations
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 63
[12] Köhl J, Kolnaar R, Ravensberg WJ. Mode of action [29] Tomah AA, Abd Alamer IS, Li B, et al. A new species
of microbial biological control agents against plant of Trichoderma and gliotoxin role: a new observa-
diseases: relevance beyond efficacy. Front Plant Sci. tion in enhancing biocontrol potential of T. virens
2019;10:845. against phytophthora capsici on chili pepper. Biol Control.
[13] Sharma PK, Gothalwal R. Trichoderma: a potent fungus 2020;145:104261.
as biological control agent agro-environmental sustain- [30] Khan RAA, Najeeb S, Hussain S, et al. Bioactive sec-
ability. Vol. 1. New York (NY): Springer International ondary metabolites from Trichoderma spp. against phy-
Publishing; 2017. p. 113–125. topathogenic fungi. Microorganisms. 2020;8(6):817.
[14] Meena M, Swapnil P, Zehra A, et al. Antagonistic [31] Yang L-N, He M-H, Ouyang H-B, et al. Cross-resistance
assessment of Trichoderma spp. by producing volatile of the pathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata to fungi-
and non-volatile compounds against different fungal cides with different modes of action. BMC Microbiol.
pathogens. Arch Phytopathology Plant Protect. 2017;50: 2019;19:205.
629–648. [32] Baibakova EV, Nefedjeva EE, Suska-Malawska M, et al.
[15] Sood M, Kapoor D, Kumar V, et al. Trichoderma: The Modern fungicides: mechanisms of action, fungal resis-
“secrets” of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants. tance and phytotoxic effects. Annu Res Rev Biol. 2019;
2020;9:762. 32(3):1–16.
[16] Piechulla B, Lemfack MC, Kai M. Effects of discrete bioac- [33] Parulekar-Berde CV, Joshi SA, Berde VB. Fungal com-
tive microbial volatiles on plants and fungi. Plant Cell munities as biological control agents for different phy-
Environ. 2017;40:2042–2067. topathogenic organisms Recent Trends in mycological
[17] Ghorbanpour M, Omidvari M, Abbaszadeh-Dahaji P, Research. New York (NY): Springer; 2020. p. 189–201.
et al. Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of [34] Asad SA, Tabassum A, Hameed A, et al. Determination of
beneficial fungi against plant diseases. Biol Control. lytic enzyme activities of indigenous Trichoderma isolates
2018;117:147–157. from Pakistan. Braz J Microbiol. 2015;46:1053–1064.
[18] Ramírez-Cariño HF, Guadarrama-Mendoza PC, Sánchez- [35] Bhat K. A New agar plate assisted slide culture technique
López V, et al. Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata and to study mycoparasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoc-
Fusarium oxysporum by Trichoderma asperelloides and tonia solani and Fusarium oxysporium. Int J Curr Microbiol
bacillus paralicheniformis in tomato plants. Antonie van Appl Sci. 2017;6:3176–3180.
Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113:1247–1261. [36] Rajani P, Rajasekaran C, Vasanthakumari M, et al. Inhi-
[19] Awad NE, Kassem HA, Hamed MA, et al. Isolation bition of plant pathogenic fungi by endophytic Tricho-
and characterization of the bioactive metabolites from derma spp. through mycoparasitism and volatile organic
the soil derived fungus Trichoderma viride. Mycology. compounds. Microbiol Res. 2021;242:126595.
2018;9:70–80. [37] Keswani C, Singh HB, Hermosa R, et al. Antimicrobial sec-
[20] Bunbury-Blanchette AL, Walker AK. Trichoderma species ondary metabolites from agriculturally important fungi
show biocontrol potential in dual culture and green- as next biocontrol agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol.
house bioassays against Fusarium basal rot of onion. Biol 2019;103:9287–9303.
Control. 2019;130:127–135. [38] Sornakili A, Thankappan S, Sridharan A, et al. Antagonistic
[21] Naglot A, Goswami S, Rahman I, et al. Antagonistic fungal endophytes and their metabolite-mediated inter-
potential of native T. viride strain against potent tea actions against phytopathogens in rice. Physiol Mol Plant
fungal pathogens in North east India. Plant Pathol J. Path. 2020;112:101525.
2015;31:278. [39] Ismaiel AA, Ali DM. Antimicrobial properties of 6-pentyl-
[22] Synytsya A, Monkai J, Bleha R, et al. Antimicrobial activity α-pyrone produced by endophytic strains of Tricho-
of crude extracts prepared from fungal mycelia. Asian Pac derma koningii and its effect on aflatoxin B1 production.
J Trop Biomed. 2017;7:257–261. Biologia. 2017;72(12):1403–1415.
[23] Yassin MT, Mostafa AA, Al-Askar AA. In vitro antican- [40] Pandey M, Ahmad S, John SA, et al. Antifungal potential
didal potency of syzygium aromaticum (clove) extracts of native Trichoderma isolates against pythium aphani-
against vaginal candidiasis. BMC Complement Altern dermatum causing chilli damping-off. Ann Plant Prot Sci.
Med. 2020;20:25. 2019;27:102–106.
[24] Bhardwaj N, Kumar J. Characterization of volatile sec- [41] Alfiky A, Weisskopf L. Deciphering trichoderma–plant–
ondary metabolites from Trichoderma asperellum. J Appl pathogen interactions for better development of biocon-
Nat Sci. 2017;9:954–959. trol applications. Journal of Fungi. 2021;7(1):61.
[25] Dukare AS, Singh RK, Jangra RK, et al. Non-fungicides- [42] Degani O, Khatib S, Becher P, et al. Trichoderma asperel-
based promising technologies for managing post-pro lum secreted 6-pentyl-α-pyrone to control magnapor-
duction penicillium induced spoilage in horticultural thiopsis maydis, the Maize late wilt disease agent. Biology
commodities: a comprehensive review. Food Rev Int. (Basel). 2021;10(9):897.
2020: 1–41. [43] Sharma VS, Sharma PR. The comparative mechanistic
[26] Mazrou YS, Makhlouf AH, Elseehy MM, et al. Antagonis- aspects of Trichoderma and probiotics: scope for future
tic activity and molecular characterization of biological research. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2017;100:84–96.
control agent Trichoderma harzianum from Saudi arabia. [44] Ahsan T, Chen J, Zhao X, et al. Extraction and identi-
Egypt J Biol Pest Co. 2020;30:4. fication of bioactive compounds (eicosane and dibutyl
[27] Adnan M, Islam W, Shabbir A, et al. Plant defense against phthalate) produced by streptomyces strain KX852460 for
fungal pathogens by antagonistic fungi with Tricho- the biological control of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 strain
derma in focus. Microb Pathog. 2019;129:7–18. KX852461 to control target spot disease in tobacco leaf.
[28] Bizos G, Papatheodorou EM, Chatzistathis T, et al. The AMB Express. 2017;7:54.
role of microbial inoculants on plant protection, growth [45] Mookherjee A, Bera P, Mitra A, et al. Characterization
stimulation, and crop productivity of the olive tree (Olea and synergistic effect of antifungal volatile organic com-
europea L). Plants. 2020;9(6):743. pounds emitted by the geotrichum candidum PF005,
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 65
an endophytic fungus from the eggplant. Microb Ecol. [50] He X, Zhang L, Chen J, et al. Correlation between Chem-
2018;75:647–661. ical composition and antifungal activity of clausena
[46] Liu Q, Yin G, Zhang J. The suitable condition for lactobacil- lansium essential Oil against candida spp. Molecules.
lus parafarraginis ZH1 producing hexadecanoic acid and 2019;24:1394.
inhibiting pathogenic and spoilage yeasts. Biol Control. [51] Cai R, Hu M, Zhang Y, et al. Antifungal activity and mech-
2020;149:104318. anism of citral, limonene and eugenol against zygosaccha-
[47] Debonne E, Vermeulen A, Bouboutiefski N, et al. Mod- romyces rouxii. Lwt. 2019;106:50–56.
elling and validation of the antifungal activity of DL- [52] de Medeiros CA, ÂdV P, de Oliveira JC, et al. Evaluating the
3-phenyllactic acid and acetic acid on bread spoilage antifungal activity of α-bisabolol in association with NaCl
moulds. Food Microbiol. 2020;88:103407. on Fusarium oxysporum in Maize grains. Curr Microbiol.
[48] Zhang H, Du H, Xu Y. Volatile organic compound- 2021;78(2):604–610.
mediated antifungal activity of pichia spp. and Its effect [53] Khruengsai S, Pripdeevech P, D’Souza PE, et al. Biofumi-
on the metabolic profiles of fermentation communities. gation activities of volatile compounds from two Tricho-
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(9):e02992–e02920. derma afroharzianum strains against Fusarium infections
[49] Wang H, Yang Z, Ying G, et al. Antifungal evaluation of in fresh chilies. J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101:5861–5871.
plant essential oils and their major components against
toxigenic fungi. Ind Crops Prod. 2018;120:180–186.