Elevated Guideways
Elevated Guideways
Elevated Guideways
Elevated Guideways
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Existing Guidance
3.0 Objectives
4.0 Design Guidance
City of Toronto
Transit Design Guide
Acknowledgements:
Access Planning
Perkins&Will Figure 1: Linear Park beneath elevated guideway, Carnegie (Mamamag.com)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definition
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
Elevated guideways are sections of track infrastructure between • Emergency walkway: A narrow walkway alongside the
stations that are raised above grade or street level. A series guideway for emergency egress or access.
of factors influence the layout and resulting guideway type,
• Guards, Barriers or Railings: For added safety
including:
requirements, guards, barriers, or railing elements / features
• Context and urban fabric in which it is located (right-of-way installed along the edge of the guideway and required to
width, elevation, built-up, parks or open space, natural areas meet established safety standards.
(e.g., valleys, floodplain), urban or suburban).
• Underpass: The open-air space directly beneath the
• Alignment of guideway to its surrounding context, such guideway structure.
as adjacent networks of streets and blocks (parallel,
• Piers and columns: Vertical structure that supports the load
intersecting, etc.).
of the horizontal span of the guideway.
• Adjacency of the guideway to other corridors such as
• Bents: Bents come in a variety of configurations including
highways, rail tracks, or natural features such as ravines or
“T” and “Y” shaped bents. For example, straddle bents are
linear parks.
composed of a large beam that is held up by columns on
• Visibility of the guideway from the surrounding public realm. either side, used instead of a regular central pier when a
roadway runs under the guideway.
Components of an elevated guideway include:
• Foundation: The structure that supports the guideway into
• Guideway: The track and concrete structure on which a the earth.
transit vehicle travels.
Catenary Vehicle
or third Barrier or
rail Railing
Emergency
Walkway
Guideway
Integrated
Servicing
Underpass
Pier
CITY OF TORONTO
ZONE 1
ZONE 3
(including track
elements)
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
3
1.3 Applications of Elevated Guideways
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
Several applications of Elevated Guideway have been identified, based on factors such as the locational alignment or the nature of
the surrounding context. Each of these have different considerations and impacts on adjacent infrastructure, development, and/or
public realm.
Figure 5: CTrain and the downtown Calgary skyline (Photo Credit: Shutterstock) Figure 6: Hawaii Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) light metro system, Honolulu
(Photo Credit: Catherine Cruz, HPR)
4
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
Figure 9: Illustration demonstrating elevated rail going through ravine and natural area,
Ontario Line (Photo Credit: Metrolinx)
5
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
Figure 11: Cross section of rail line on embankment, Ontario Line (Metrolinx)
Figure 10: Mass Transit Railway (MTR) elevated system above other rail infrastructure,
Hong Kong (Reddit)
6
1.4 Typical Project Delivery
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
The selection of an elevated system as the preferred transit In the Toronto context, elevated systems are typically packaged
solution occurs early on during Master Planning and with other elements as part of a Public Private Partnership
Preliminary Design. While precedents around the world (P3) procurement process. Under these circumstances, it is
demonstrate that beautiful and well-integrated elevated systems expected that:
are possible, it brings additional design challenges that must
• Guideways will be designed in conjunction with other
be considered: elements of the system that would otherwise
elements of the transit system, rather than in isolation. The
be below-grade are now in plain sight and need to be carefully
transit agency delivering the project should produce project-
designed and integrated within the public realm. Additionally,
specific guidance documents that address overall cohesivity
public, Indigenous and accessibility related consultation should
of the design and ensure continuity in identity throughout
be considered during the Design Development phase.
the transit line. These documents should be part of the
procurement documents.
For these reasons, it is necessary that the evaluation criteria
developed for any Business Case or Environmental Impact • City of Toronto staff should participate in the preparation of
Assessment takes into consideration all the benefits, the procurement documents and provide input as per the
opportunities and challenges of an elevated system, including guidelines included in this document.
typology, alignment and location. This should include the cost
of delivering high quality elevated elements, the investment • Local transit agencies (e.g. TTC) will have input on special
in the public realm design to integrate the structure, the cost track operations, including switches, crossovers, and pocket
of restoring any impacted built or natural areas as well as tracks. They will accommodate regularly scheduled turnback
the additional operational costs involved in maintaining the service for sections experiencing differential demand, run-
structure and associated spaces. A life cycle assessment of the as-directed service for event surges, critical or strategic
carbon footprint should be part of the Business Case prior to segments for perturbation operations, short turn locations
selecting an elevated system as the preferred option. to maintain vehicle line operations, and others.
7
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
8
2.0 EXISTING GUIDANCE
9
3.0 OBJECTIVES
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
Accountability
Urban Integration
reliable service, and avoid conflicts with other modes of travel.
Elevated guideways should integrate seamlessly with the
Elevated guideway design should consider the entire lifecycle,
existing and planned urban context and take advantage of the
use of materials and construction methods that account for
physical infrastructure to create a sense of place within the
whole life cost, and foresee the need to accommodate new
public realm; their placement should enhance connectivity
transit lines, improved service, changes in capacity and new
rather than create barriers and optimize integration with
technology. Importantly, the siting, massing and design of
adjacent new development rather than sterilize development
elevated guideways should allow for optimization of future
sites.
overbuild and/or active Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
frontages.
User Experience
Elevated guideways should allow for a safe, legible, and
accessible user experience, benefiting both users of the transit
line while not compromising the quality of space for the local
10
4.0 DESIGN GUIDANCE
Urban Integration
a. Respond to the scale of the street, especially in areas a. To be as slender as possible, to reduce both visual and
where the guideway is located adjacent to built-up physical obstruction at grade;
areas.
b. With enhanced treatments (e.g. greening, public
b. Ensure clear views at grade up to 2 storeys (minimum art, signage, etc.) to improve the experience at the
7.5 metres from the existing ground level), while pedestrian level;
maintaining visibility across the street and adjacent
c. To be located with consideration of street elements
public realm so that the street is perceived as one
such as the curb, sidewalk, median, or intersections, to
whole space.
maximize sightlines and pedestrian permeability; and
c. Maximize use of the underpass area and ensure access
d. To be coordinated with the location of existing and
to sunlight on the public realm below, especially when
planned street trees and other vertical elements such as
it includes uses such as natural areas, landscaped or
lighting poles.
recreational spaces.
Figure 14: Richmond-Brighouse Station, Canada Line (Photo Credit: Perkins&Will) Figure 15: Sukhumvit Road, Bangkok, Thailand (Photo Credit: Urban Capture)
11
Urban Integration
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
7. Minimize the width of the guideway to limit shadowing 14. Design setbacks as an integrated component of the public
under the guideway. Alternately, consider splitting the realm through use of buffers that include street trees and
guideway into two, to reduce the extent of areas in full multi-use trails and/or recreational areas.
shadow.
15. Provide adequate vertical and horizontal setbacks from
8. Design guideway guards and railings to consider visual elevated guideways as appropriate, to:
impact (views and shadows) from street level and impact
a. Respond to both the existing and planned context;
on noise attenuation. Guideway structures and associated
guards and railings should be designed in an integrated b. Ensure daylighting of the public realm;
fashion.
c. Provide comfortable areas of circulation for pedestrians
and cyclists, both surrounding and under the elevated
structure; and
12
Urban Integration
Encourage TOD
Elevated Guideways:
Parallel to the Street Back of
house uses
street
multi use
path
Encourage TOD
Elevated Guideways:
Off-Street Back of
house uses
street
service lane
Discourage TOD
Elevated Guideways:
Parallel to the Street Back of
house uses
street
Figure 18: Examples of how TOD can be integrated with different elevated guideway typologies. Teal represents TOD,
whereas the grey represents back of house uses
13
Urban Integration
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
31. Minimize the loss of mature trees with the design of new
infrastructure.
Figure 21: Unique materiality along infrastructure to support adjacent cyclist and pedestrian
trail, Melton Highway, Melbourne (Photo Credit: M James Holdings)
Figure 19: Underpass skate trail and flexible public space beneath the Gardiner Expressway,
Toronto (Photo Credit: The Bentway)
CITY OF TORONTO
2022
Figure 22: Unique materiality and landscaping to support adjacent cyclist and pedestrian
trail, Melton Highway, Melbourne (Photo Credit: M James Holdings)
14
Case Study
Melbourne Skyrail's level crossings removal
project – Victoria, Australia
Figure 26: Guideway structure does not obstruct views surrounding the public space, with
minimal shade (Photo Credit: ASPECT Studios)
Figure 23: Bike infrastructure such as racks and bollards provide intermodal
connections (Photo Credit: Carnegie Place)
Figure 27: Consistency in guideway components such as clear and integrated wayfinding (Photo
Credit: ASPECT Studios)
Figure 24: Clearly delineated pedestrian furniture zones at Carnegie Station Linear
Park (Photo Credit: SVC) Figure 28: Structure maintains access to sunlight, with bright colours for wayfinding (Photo
Credit: ASPECT Studios)
15
User Experience
1. Provide a high-quality and accessible public realm that 8. Encourage intuitive wayfinding through the architectural
fosters intuitive wayfinding and congregation to encourage treatment of the guideway and surrounding area.
community interaction.
9. Specify materials and/or construction methods that provide
2. Create visual and built connections to adjacent amenities to mitigation of noise and vibration impacts; cost should be
maximize accessibility to the larger surrounding context considered during the business case.
3. Design and align elevated structures to be visually 10. Avoid dark corners or spaces that may be susceptible to
permeable, complement adjacent structures, and respond loitering or undesirable activities.
to context.
11. Minimize height and opacity of parapet and/or guards,
4. Provide multi-use pathways between the guideway to limit the perception of height of the guideway and
and development(s), creating an active space for the shadowing, thus creating a safe, comfortable, and
development to front onto, where there is a landscaped pedestrian-scaled experience, without sacrificing the
setback condition. required safety standards for the guideway design.
Figure 30: Light and elegant guideway structure, RandstadRail, The Hague, Netherlands
(Photo Credit: ZJA)
16
Case Study
Miami Underline – Miami, Florida
User Experience
The Miami Underline is a 120-acre project beneath the
Figure 31: Public art and multi use pathway beneath the elevated structure (Photo 18. Explore opportunities for greening spaces beyond the street
Credits: The Underline, Robin Hill)
level, including green track and green walls, by:
17
User Experience
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
24. Avoid light fixtures that may impact or reduce the vertical
clearance along pedestrian and cycling paths of travel.
Figure 34: Integrated retail frontages, Nakameguo, Tokyo (Photo Credit: Web Japan)
CITY OF TORONTO
2022
18
Sustainability &
Resilience
4.3 Sustainability and Resilience
2. Consider options for reducing carbon footprint, including 8. Implement best practices in performance-based
but not limited to, the reduction of cementitious materials specifications to maintain and improve air quality.
or the use of carbon-absorptive concrete, low carbon
concrete, or self-cleaning concrete.
Figure 35: Vertical gardens installed on piers, Mexico City (Photo Credit: Via Verde)
Figure 36: Vertical gardens were constructed on approximately 1,000 piers all along the guideway and other transit infrastructure, Mexico City (Photo Credit: Via Verde)
19
Intermodal Accountability
Operations
4.4 Intermodal Operations
Elevated Guideways | TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDE
1. Redesign streets accessing and running adjacent to the 3. Implement planned changes to the design, layout and/or
elevated guideway to ensure they are transit-supportive configuration of streets running adjacent to the elevated
complete streets that facilitate good pedestrian, cyclist and guideway together with the guideway project to coordinate
surface transit access, and facilitate mode shifts to transit their design and minimize community disruption.
and active transportation.
4. Future-proof for connections to planned active
2. Consider increase in risk from a non-fully-enclosed/ transportation routes.
protected operating environment as these may require
5. Clarify ownership and maintenance obligations for space
additional maintenance.
under guideways through project delivery process.
3. Design elevated guideways to support operations
6. The design and alignment of the guideway should protect
requirements as set out by the transit agency, such as train
for future stations by considering:
capacities, headway, speed, end-to-end travel times, and
traction power systems. a. Adjacent and surrounding development parcels and
designated growth areas / nodes, coordinated with
4. Identify space and location requirements for operations and
potential future land uses and multi-modal networks;
maintenance. An Operation and Maintenance agreement
should be executed prior to implementation of the final b. Location and orientation of the track to accommodate
plan. new platforms and stations, including the provision of
flat track, tangent track, separation between tracks and
5. Provide adequate setbacks or lateral clearances around
location of crossovers;
structures to guarantee adequate maintenance access.
c. Reasonable rough-in of structural infrastructure to
6. Consider impacts of seasonality on transit maintenance
accommodate future additions;
and operations, such as: tree leaves on tracks; and winter
impacts (snow and ice) to design a safe and comfortable d. Coordination with other infrastructure such as hydro
experience. towers or maintenance facilities to optimize potential
for future uses; and
7. Clearly define maintenance boundaries of transit facilities
at-grade to all responsible parties involved. e. The preservation of space within the easement for
future transit uses, including the underpass area for
ancillary uses or an enhanced public realm.
4.5 Accountability
20
4.6 Applications Specific Guidance
1. Provide sufficient setbacks around the off-street guideway 8. Limit the extent of intervention, to protect mature trees,
to mitigate impacts on existing or sensitive land uses natural areas and their ecological functions through an
and infrastructure to provide access to the guideway for interactive responsive design process.
maintenance. 9. Limit the degree of temporary and permanent impacts,
2. Explore opportunities to integrate active transportation including the visual and physical scales of the structures,
networks alongside the transit corridor in off-street noise or light pollution.
guideways, especially where multi-use pathways exist 10. Propose ecologically based restorative design solutions for
3. For taller guideways, or “in the sky” applications: landscape treatment below guideway.
a. Limit impacts on sky-view, skyline, and significant or 11. Consider the local ecology, with reference to Toronto and
heritage views from the public realm. Region Conservation Authority standards.
b. Consider access to the elevated structure for 12. Ensure continued functionality and access to park spaces
maintenance and emergency evacuation. below the guideway and limit disruptions to existing park
networks.
Middle of the Street
13. Avoid disruptions to existing parks operations (permitted
4. Design the underpass landscape area to be visually and non-permitted facilities) and park network
appealing and require little maintenance due to its high connections.
visibility in the middle of the street and constraints to
14. Maintain, restore and enhance areas impacted by
access.
surrounding transit infrastructure according to City
standards.
Parallel to the Street
21