0510 English As A Second Language: MARK SCHEME For The October/November 2014 Series
0510 English As A Second Language: MARK SCHEME For The October/November 2014 Series
0510 English As A Second Language: MARK SCHEME For The October/November 2014 Series
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner
Report for Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2014 series for
most Cambridge IGCSE®, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some
Cambridge O Level components.
AO1: Reading
R1 understand and respond to information presented in a variety of forms
R2 select and organise material relevant to specific purposes
R3 recognise, understand and distinguish between facts, ideas and opinions
AO2: Writing
W1 communicate clearly, accurately and appropriately
W2 convey information and express opinions effectively
W3 employ and control a variety of grammatical structures
W4 demonstrate knowledge and understanding of a range of appropriate vocabulary
W5 observe conventions of paragraphing, punctuation and spelling
W6 employ appropriate register/style
70
(b) walk into igloo / feel (the coldness of) ice [1]
accept synonyms for ‘walk’ e.g. ‘enter/go’
(c) suggest how it looks / suggest what they want inside / design(ed) by them [1]
(f) pretend they work at weather centre / predict storms / predict rain [1]
(g) might fall into a deep hole / in case of accident(s) and injury(ies) [1]
(j) they stared for many minutes / they stood for many minutes / they stood and stared [1]
Section D
In the space below, write one sentence about why you want to buy this membership gift, and one
sentence about where you heard of our organisation.
Sample sentence 1
Sample sentence 2
2 marks: proper sentence construction; correct spelling, punctuation and grammar; gives the
information asked for
1 mark: proper sentence construction; 1–3 errors of punctuation / spelling / grammar (without
obscuring meaning); gives the information asked for
0 marks: more than 3 errors of punctuation / spelling / grammar; and/or does not give the
information asked for; and/or not a proper sentence; and/or meaning obscure
Statistical data about the jump (max 3 marks for this heading)
Problems before and during the trip (max 2 marks for this heading)
Exercise 5: summary
2 marks: heavy reliance on language from the text with no attempt to organise and sequence
points cohesively / limited language expression making meaning at times unclear
3 marks: some reliance on language from the text, but with an attempt to organise and
sequence points cohesively / language satisfactory, but with some inaccuracies
4 marks: good attempt to use own words and to organise and sequence points cohesively /
generally good control of language
5 marks: good, concise summary style / very good attempt to use own words and to organise
and sequence points cohesively
The following general instructions, and table of marking criteria, apply to both exercises.
• Award the answer a mark for content (C) [out of 7] and a mark for language (L) [out of 6] in
accordance with the General Criteria table that follows.
• Content covers relevance (i.e. whether the piece fulfils the task and the awareness of
purpose/audience/register) and the development of ideas (i.e. the detail/explanation
provided and how enjoyable it is to read).
• Language covers style (i.e. complexity of vocabulary and sentence structure) and accuracy
(of grammar, spelling, punctuation and use of paragraphs).
• When deciding on a mark for content or language, first of all decide which mark band is most
appropriate. There will not necessarily be an exact fit. Then decide between 2 marks within
that mark band. Use the lower mark if it only just makes it into the band and the upper mark if
it fulfils all the requirements of the band but doesn’t quite make it into the band above.
• When deciding on a mark for content, look at both relevance and development of ideas.
First ask yourself whether the writing fulfils the task, in terms of points to be covered and the
length. If it does, it will be in the 4–5 mark band.
• When deciding on a mark for language, look at both the style and the accuracy of the
language. A useful starting point would be first to determine whether errors intrude. If they do
not, it will be in the 4–5 mark band.
• The use of paragraphs should not be the primary basis of deciding which mark band the
work is in. Look first at the language used and once you have decided on the appropriate
mark band, you can use the paragraphing as a factor in helping you to decide whether the
work warrants the upper or lower mark in the mark band.
• If the essay is considerably shorter than the stated word length, fewer than 70 words, it
should be put in mark band 2–3 for content or lower for not fulfilling the task. The language
mark is likely to be affected and is unlikely to be more than one band higher than the content
mark.
• If the essay is totally irrelevant and has nothing to do with the question asked, it should be
given 0 marks for Content and Language, even if it is enjoyable to read and fluent.
• If the essay is partly relevant and therefore in mark band 2–3, the full range of marks for
language is available.
Relevance: Style:
Fulfils the task, with appropriate register Sentences show some style and
and a good sense of purpose and ambitious language. However, there
audience. may be some awkwardness making
Award 7 marks. reading less enjoyable.
Award 6 marks.
Fulfils the task, with appropriate register
and some sense of purpose and Accuracy:
audience. Generally accurate with frustrating
Award 6 marks. errors. Appropriate use of paragraphing.
Award 6 marks.
Development of ideas:
Ideas are developed at appropriate
length. Engages reader’s interest.
Relevance: Style:
Fulfils the task. A satisfactory attempt Mainly simple structures and vocabulary
has been made to address the topic, but but sometimes attempting a wider range
there may be digressions. of language.
Award 5 marks. Award 5 marks.
Does not quite fulfil the task although Mainly simple structures and vocabulary.
there are some positive qualities. There Award 4 marks.
may be digressions.
Award 4 marks. Accuracy:
Meaning is clear and of a safe standard.
Development of ideas: Grammatical errors occur when
Material is satisfactorily developed at attempting more ambitious language.
appropriate length. Paragraphs are used, showing some
coherence.
Award 5 marks.
Relevance: Style:
Partly relevant and some engagement Simple structures and vocabulary.
with the task. Inappropriate register,
showing insufficient awareness of Accuracy:
purpose and / or audience. Meaning is sometimes in doubt.
Award 3 marks. Frequent errors do not seriously impair
communication.
Partly relevant and limited engagement Award 3 marks.
with the task. Inappropriate register,
showing insufficient awareness of Meaning is often in doubt. Frequent,
purpose and / or audience. distracting errors which slow down
Award 2 marks. reading.
Award 2 marks.
Development of ideas:
Supplies some detail but the effect is
incomplete and repetitive.
Very limited engagement with task, but Multiple types of error in grammar /
this is mostly hidden by density of error. spelling / word usage / punctuation
Award 1 mark. throughout, which mostly make it difficult
to understand. Occasionally, sense can
No engagement with the task or any be deciphered.
engagement with task is completely Award 1 mark.
hidden by density of error.
Award 0 marks. Density of error completely obscures
meaning. Whole sections impossible to
If essay is completely irrelevant, no mark recognise as pieces of English writing.
can be given for language. Award 0 marks.