Surface Modification of Polypropylene Fi
Surface Modification of Polypropylene Fi
Surface Modification of Polypropylene Fi
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Low-wetting low-hydrophilicity polipropylene fiber has been treated by means of non-thermal dielectric
Available online 24 June 2013 barrier discharge plasma. The fiber has been characterized before and after the treatment by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and industrial tests of sub-
Keywords: mersion in water. The cold plasma was generated in a helium–air mixture at a 2 kHz frequency and
Polypropylene fiber 12–18 kV potential. The treatment periods ranged from 1 min up to 3 min. The results present an increase
Plasma treatment
in the oxygen content which rose from 2.5% to 4.8%. SEM analysis reveals a surface change of the fiber
SEM
with the formation of nodules, which is confirmed by AFM. Water submersion experiments show an
X-ray diffraction
enhancement of the hydrophilic capability of the samples.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0300-9440/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.05.029
A. Mercado-Cabrera et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 76 (2013) 1858–1862 1859
[10] providing 12–18 kV voltages at 2 kHz frequency was used to except in the case of high power and long treatment time (Fig. 2,
generate the non-thermal plasma discharge. The relative humidity Table 1). Also, it was possible to observe that treatment time should
(% R.H.) was measured with an HD500 Extech Instruments psy- be lower than 3 min for similar working conditions. Otherwise,
chrometer. The treated samples were analyzed by SEM, AFM, X-ray long exposure times will oxidize and destroy the material with
diffraction and water submersion tests. the generation of CO2 [11]. The oxygen presence in the polypro-
pylene surface is linked to the enhancement of its hydrophylicity
3. Results and discussion capacity [8,9]. 10–12 kV SEM potentials were used for the elemen-
tal analyses and 20 kV were applied for the picture frame when it
3.1. SEM analysis was possible.
SEM micrographs (Fig. 3) show the evolution of the fiber sur-
The elemental content was determined before and after the face topography along the treatment for differents power applied
treatment by EDX analysis. The output showed an increment of the and the untreated one. In the first seconds of treatment, Fig. 3(b), it
atomic oxygen % as the power and time of treatment were increased observes an increase of the roughness (not measured). The helium
Table 1
SEM measured elemental percentage.
addition to the mixture allowed to diminish the breakdown poten- along with the treatment duration. Contrary to results in [13], the
tial of the discharge and so the treatment temperature sufficiently fiber did not require being washed to be AFM analyzed.
low to avoid the streamers formation that could damage the fiber
as happened with air.
3.3. X-ray diffraction analysis
3.2. AFM analysis X-ray diffraction revealed that important damages had not been
made to the polypropylene fiber and that it preserved its structure
The samples of polypropylene fiber, untreated and treated, were in general, as shown in Fig. 5.
analyzed by AFM using non-contact procedure. The results showed The conditions prevailing during the X-ray difractometry were:
changes on the surface of the fiber. Before the treatment the mate- 35 kV, 25 mA acceleration voltage and current respectively, a char-
rial presented a flat surface with some depth on the surface. In acteristic = 1.5406 CuK␣ line wavelength of the copper target, a
general, after plasma treatment, it can be observed an etching 2 range within 10◦ –30◦ , and a 0.030◦ angular step size.
effect over PP surface resulting in a regular pattern. As non-thermal The diffractogrammes of the untreated and treated polypropyl-
plasma treatment time was increased several nodules were formed ene are shown in Fig. 5. A broadening was not observed in the
on the surface of the fiber, as seen in Fig. 4(b)–(d), in agreement with treated samples spectra but a slight 2 shift of the main peaks
previous reports [12,13]. The size of such formations was increased to the right with respect to the untreated sample. The relative
Fig. 3. SEM images of the PP fiber samples: (a) untreated sample and treated samples for 3 min at 71.2% R.H., (b) 10.0 W, (c) 16.70 W, (d) 32.10 W.
A. Mercado-Cabrera et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 76 (2013) 1858–1862 1861
Fig. 4. AFM images of PP fiber samples for: (a) untreated sample and samples treated at 16.70 W and 71.2% R.H. for: (b) 1 min, (c) 2 min, (d) 3 min.
intensities of industrial polypropylene fiber were compared to (9) (0 1 2), 28.278◦ . Only the first plane (1 1 0) in 14.089◦ and the
those of the 00-054-1936 JCPDS data file. It should be observed that sixth plane (n 5 1) in 25.580◦ were straightforwardly identified. The
the intensities reported on this data file refer to a sample of polypro- other intensities and planes of the untreated polypropylene were
pylene crushed to a powder and prepared with calcium carbonate. shifted to the left or right with respect to those reported on the
Nevertheless, the main polypropylene peaks shown in Fig. 5 were 00-054-1936 data file. Specifically, these are: the second at 16.93◦ ,
largely coincident and therefore identifiable. the third at 18.58◦ , the fourth at 21.82◦ and the ninth at 28.39◦ .
According to the 00-054-1936 JCPDS data file, the difraction The presence of the rest of the peaks was not observed in the
planes and the difraction 2 angles are: (1) (1 1 0), 14.089◦ , (2) untreated sample, indicating that it presents a crystalinity differ-
(n 4 0), 17.087◦ , (3) (1 3 0), 18.485◦ , (4) (1 4 0), 21.783◦ , (5) (1 5 0), ent to that of the polypropylene reported on the JCPDS data file.
25.080◦ , (6) (n 5 1), 25.580◦ , (7) (n 6 0), 26.079◦ , (8) (2 0 0), 27.278◦ , The results of X-ray difraction also indicated that, (1) the intensity
of the peaks was increased on all the samples whereby it can be
considered that the treated sample acquired a better crystalinity
due of the structural arrangement of the atoms in the polypro-
pylene, (2) some peaks were practically not observed before the
treatment and they became more visible afterwards, i.e., the plane
(0 1 2) near to 28.278◦ , (3) a slight 2 shift of the peaks is observed
to the right of those of the untreated sample, (4) the polypropyl-
ene was not substantially modified and the material conserves its
structural properties, as X-ray spectrum taken after the treatment
showed.
Moreover, the wide-angle X-ray scattering spectra from X-ray
diffraction was used to determine the cristallinity of the sample
[14]. The cristallinity was calculated by dividing the total area
of cristalline peaks by the total area under the diffraction curve
(crystalline plus amorphoud peaks). Therefore, the crystallinity
percentage was estimated around ∼46.45% for the untreated PP
sample and ∼50.01% for the treated PP sample with 1 min of treat-
ment (red line, Fig. 5).
The method of contact angle does not an appropriate technique
to measure the hydrophylicity of a fiber due to its irregular and
cylindrical nature [4], and because the porous structure can absorb
the liquid. In their place we used a direct industrial technique
Fig. 5. X-ray diffraction for untreated and treated samples. to evaluate the hydrophylicity in a bulk of the treated fibers. It
1862 A. Mercado-Cabrera et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 76 (2013) 1858–1862
Table 2
Water submersion experimental results.
10
15
4. Conclusions References
The results of the present study have showed an increment in [1] S. Yu Akishev, M.E. Grushin, A.E. Monich, A.P. Napartovich, N.I. Trushkin, High
Energy Chem. 37 (2003) 286–290.
the hydrophylicity capacity of the polypropylene fiber after the [2] R. Dorai, M.J. Kushner, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36 (2003) 666–685.
treatment with non-termal plasma. The AFM and SEM studies [3] A.N. Bhoj, M.J. Kushner, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40 (2007) 6953–6968.
revealed morphological changes on the polyprolylene surface. No [4] R. Morent, N. De Geyter, J. Verschuren, K. De Clerck, P. Kiekens, C. Leys, Surf.
Coat. Technol. 202 (2008) 3427–3449.
important damages on the surface of PP fiber were caused by the [5] R. Nisticò, M.G. Faga, G. Gautier, G. Magnacca, D. D’Angelo, E. Ciancio, G. Pia-
treatment, although, we constated a light increase of crystalinity cenza, R. Lamberti, S. Martorana, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 (2012) 7889–7896.
after the non-thermal plasma treatment. An increase in the crystal- [6] G. Borcia, C.A. Anderson, N.M.D. Brown, Appl. Surf. Sci. 221 (2004), 303-214.
[7] G. Borcia, C.A. Anderson, N.M.D. Brown, Appl. Surf. Sci. 225 (2004) 186–197.
inity benefits the hydrophilicity because it keeps the rigidity of the [8] Ch. Liu, N. Cui, N.M.D. Brown, B.J. Meenan, Surf. Coat. Technol. 185 (2004)
polymeric chain and avoids the lost of the new functional groups. 311–320.
In contrast to other authors’ observations [13], washed fibers main- [9] Ch. Wang, X. He, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 (2006) 3377–3384.
[10] O. Godoy-Cabrera, J.S. Benítez-Read, R. López-Callejas, J. Pacheco-Sotelo, Int. J.
tained their capacity to be integrated again to water. Contrary to the
Electron. 87 (2000) 361–376.
methods regularly applied to polypropylene film, the hydrophylic [11] E.V. Kuvaldina, V.V. Rybkin, V.A. Titov, T.G. Shikova, D.A. Shutov, High Energy
capacity of the fiber was evaluated in bulk by submerging it in a Chem. 38 (2004) 411–414.
volume of water in order to analyze its temporary evolution. The [12] Q.F. Wei, Mater. Char. 52 (2004) 231–235.
[13] T.M.C. Nishime, K.G. Kostov, 14th LAWPP, Argentina, 2011, pp. P247.
results of this method are promising since they enable to integrate [14] Y.I. Yun, K.S. Kim, S.-J. Uhm, B.B. Khatua, K. Cho, J.K. Kim, Ch.E. Park, J. Adhesion
the commercial polypropylene fiber more homogeneously in an Sci. Technol. 18 (2004) 1279–1291.
aqueous solution during the manufacture of polypropylene sheets.