Semester Two Progress Report Grade 12 Gasali Samantha Faith 33202211043
Semester Two Progress Report Grade 12 Gasali Samantha Faith 33202211043
Semester Two Progress Report Grade 12 Gasali Samantha Faith 33202211043
Village
Semester Two Progress
Report
Prepared: March 8, 2024
Grade: Grade 12
Yearly Attendance
Absent Present Late Health Other
0 128 0 1 0
AO3: Communicate 4
Self-Management Skills G
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills C
AO1: Communicate clearly and effectively in a range of contexts and for a variety of purposes. 6
AO2: Understand and use language appropriate to a range of inter-personal and/or intercultural contexts and audiences. 6
AO3: Understand and use language to express and responds to a range of ideas with fluency and accuracy. 6
AO5: Understand, analyse and reflect upon a range of written, audio, visual and audio-visual texts. 6
Self-Management Skills G
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
AO4. Select, use and apply a variety of appropriate skills and techniques 5
Self-Management Skills S
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
AO1: Demonstrate and apply: knowledge and understanding of: facts, concepts and terminology; methodologies and
3
techniques; communicating scientific information.
AO2: Formulate, analyse and evaluate: hypotheses, research questions and predictions; methodologies and techniques,
6
primary and secondary data, scientific explanations.
AO3: Demonstrate the appropriate research, experimental, and personal skills necessary to carry out insightful and
4
ethical investigations.
Self-Management Skills G
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Communication Skills G
AO1: Demonstrate concrete knowledge and understanding of mathematical facts, concepts, techniques and skills. 7
AO2: Apply mathematical skills and techniques to interpret and solve various problems. 6
AO3: Communicate mathematical knowledge and understanding via the correct use of notations, terminologies,
6
diagrams and graphs, and logical arguments as well as the utilisation of technology.
Self-Management Skills C
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills C
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
AO4: Select, use and apply a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. 6
Self-Management Skills G
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
AO1: Demonstrate an understanding of knowledge questions that are linked to specific areas of knowledge and ways of
6
knowing
AO2: Analyse knowledge questions discerning the inherent claims, counterclaims and implications connected to these
5
knowledge questions
Self-Management Skills G
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
Self-Management Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
AO1: Identify, associate, and reflect Godly characters and values as Indonesian citizen who believe in one and only God. 5
Social Skills G
Thinking Skills G
AO3: Process, reason, and present the result of learning in various ways 6
Self-Management Skills G
Communication Skills G
Research Skills G
Assessment Explanation
SPH Vision, Mission and Theme
Vision
Mission
Proclaiming the preeminence of Christ and engaging in the redemptive restoration of all things in Him through
holistic education
Theme
"Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the Lord has risen upon you. For behold, darkness shall
cover the earth, and thick darkness the peoples; but the Lord will arise upon you, and his glory will be seen upon
you. And nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising."
C Consistently
G Generally
S Sometimes
N Needs Improvement
Grade Descriptors
Grade Descriptor
The student demonstrates excellent content knowledge and understanding, conceptual and contextual awareness and
critical, reflective thinking. Highly effective research, investigation and technical skills are evident, as is the ability to
analyse, evaluate and synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence, knowledge and concepts to reach valid
conclusions or solve problems. In collaborative exercises, the student works very well with others, ethically and
7
responsibly, and with perseverance. Responses are highly insightful, accurate, clear, concise, convincing, logically
structured, with sufficient detail, precise use of appropriate terminology and with appropriate attention to purpose and
audience. Responses are creative, make very effective use of well-selected examples, demonstrate awareness of
alternative points of view and provide clear evidence of intercultural understanding.
The student demonstrates very good content knowledge and understanding, conceptual and contextual awareness and
6 critical, reflective thinking. Competent research, investigation and technical skills are evident, as is the ability to analyse,
evaluate and synthesize evidence, knowledge and concepts. In collaborative exercises, the student works well with
others, ethically and responsibly, and with perseverance. Responses are mainly accurate, clear, concise, convincing,
logically structured, with sufficient detail, using consistent terminology and with appropriate attention to purpose and
audience. Responses show creativity, make effective use of examples, demonstrate awareness of alternative points of
view and provide evidence of intercultural understanding.
The student demonstrates sound content knowledge and understanding, good conceptual and contextual awareness
and evidence of critical, reflective thinking. Research, investigation and technical skills are evident and sometimes well
developed. Analytical ability is evident, although responses may at times be more descriptive than evaluative. In
5 collaborative investigations, the student generally works well with others, ethically and responsibly, and with
perseverance. Responses are generally accurate, clear, logically structured and coherent, with mainly relevant material,
using suitable terminology, and are sometimes well developed. Responses show reasonable creativity, use of examples,
awareness of audience and evidence of intercultural understanding.
The student demonstrates, with some gaps, secure content knowledge and understanding, some conceptual and
contextual awareness and some evidence of critical thinking. Research, investigation and technical skills are evident,
but not thoroughly developed. Analysis is generally valid, but more descriptive than evaluative. The student solves basic
or routine problems, but with limited ability to deal with new or difficult situations. In collaborative exercises, the student
4
works within a team and generally approaches investigations ethically and responsibly, but requires supervision.
Responses are mostly accurate and clear with little irrelevant material. There is some ability to logically structure
responses with adequate coherence and use of appropriate terminology. Responses sometimes show creativity, and
include some awareness of audience and evidence of intercultural understanding.
The student demonstrates basic knowledge and understanding of the content, with limited evidence of conceptual and
contextual awareness. Research and/or investigation is evident, but remains undeveloped. There is some ability to
comprehend and solve problems. Collaborative investigations are approached ethically and responsibly, but require
3 close supervision. Responses are only sometimes valid and appropriately detailed. There is some expression of ideas
and organization of work and basic use of appropriate terminology, but arguments are rarely convincing. Responses
lack clarity and some material is repeated or irrelevant. There is limited creativity, awareness of context or audience and
limited evidence of intercultural understanding.
The student demonstrates little knowledge or understanding of the content, with weak comprehension of concepts and
context and little evidence of application. Evidence of research and/or investigation is only superficial. There is little
2 ability to comprehend and solve problems. Responses are rarely accurate or valid. There is some attempt to express
ideas, use terminology appropriate to the subject and organize work, but the response is rarely convincing. There is very
little creativity, awareness of context or audience and little evidence of intercultural understanding.
The student demonstrates very rudimentary knowledge or understanding of the content, with very weak comprehension
of concepts and context. Ability to comprehend and solve problems or to express ideas is not evident. Responses are
1 rarely accurate or valid. Organization is lacking to the point that responses are confusing. Responses demonstrate very
little to no appreciation of context or audience, inappropriate or inadequate use of terminology, and little to no
intercultural understanding.