PWC Private Company Exit Strategies
PWC Private Company Exit Strategies
PWC Private Company Exit Strategies
a private company
At the same time, with increasing valuations for companies, expectations on sellers are more
rigorous, even punishing on surprises. Proactive preparation has become mandatory; processes
are more accelerated and data-driven, quality of earnings analysis and sell-side due diligence have
become table stakes. Sellers have to respond appropriately and with confidence as experienced
buyers move toward a close.
Selling your company takes robust planning and discipline. Whether you are divesting the business
completely or bringing in a private equity investor to fuel additional growth, the process you develop
and follow will play a critical role in creating value for your shareholders and family.
Everyone has a lot more data than even five years ago to value your business, including benchmarks
and operational data sources. The one piece of information the market doesn’t have is your story:
what you’ve done and what the business can do next, setting up a clear and credible case for terms
you can justify.
The glue that holds it together is that you are clear about buyers’ expectations, understand your
company’s value and can evaluate and explain the prospects for your business. Above all, you need
to have worked through what you want to accomplish for yourself and your stakeholders with a
prospective transaction. To a large extent, this will determine the right exit strategy for you.
Many entrepreneurs today are motivated by more outcomes than retirement or a simple wealth event.
You may want to consider taking a “second bite at the apple.” This typically involves structuring
an exit that divests a controlling stake but creates a continued role to grow the return on the
remaining stake.
Whatever path you may be considering, we hope this guide serves as a useful starting point for the
conversations you will have with your stakeholders, trusted employees and family, as well as your
advisers as you realize the value you’ve worked hard to create.
Contact us:
Home
The five phases of a well-structured exit process
It depends. It depends.
You’ve just been informally You’re aware financing
approached by a potential conditions are favorable and
buyer and an intriguing ballpark that bankers will say that now
price was raised. Is the price fair? is the optimal time to sell. Is it?
While retirement is the most frequently stated reason for the sale of a business, an
ownership transfer can take place at any time. The pattern of your business—and your
life—is different from all others. Your unique history can lead to an optimal exit only
when you have thoroughly defined your objectives and priorities.
Yet too often, private company owners are simply reactive, which generally yields a
suboptimal result. They may delay planning an exit strategy because they are caught
up in day-to-day operational demands or they may find it difficult to acknowledge that
the time has come to start thinking about letting go of the business.
Being proactive empowers you to assert more control when the time is right while
enhancing the eventual value of the business to buyers. The process of identifying
objectives, to a large extent, will help you determine the right exit strategy.
Some of your priorities will be personal. Don’t put off personal (or family) tax and
wealth planning, it’s as important to an overall success story as getting the business
in shape and sold. Whatever type of exit unfolds, one outcome should be clear at
the onset: you will find yourself in a different position financially overnight. There are
portfolio management, retirement income and family trust options to consider, as well
as significant tax impacts in a sale. Topics like these should be addressed before the
business issues are addressed. We cover these issues in depth in the final section of
this report, Preparing for life after the deal.
The reality is most private companies that are not passed on to the next
generation will be sold.
These questions should help you form a clear view of the future direction for you and your
business. As you consider these, you should start to get a sense of an optimal time line
for you to transfer ownership.
There are a lot of value drivers, some more tangible and quantifiable than others.
Attractive industry fundamentals often provide for a more favorable selling environment.
Free cash flow is an important value driver for most buyers, who will model outcomes
for future cash flow to level set value for the business. Other value drivers are perceived.
Think of competitive advantage, customer relationships, attractive growth opportunities
or quality of management. Once you isolate your company’s fundamental value drivers,
you can monitor and take action where needed long before you want (or need) to sell. For
example, the balance sheet and cash flow may need to be improved, perhaps through
cost cutting or a debt restructuring, or the management team may need to be upgraded.
New internal or external managers are sometimes more willing to address certain
personnel issues, resulting in improved efficiency and morale.
Market Dynamics
Typically, retention planning ahead of a transaction takes place on several levels, with
strategies for high performers or potentials who are critical to the success of the business
long term, as they are likely the individuals who will be considered lucrative to deal value
and should have a place in any NewCo. Secondly, planning should consider strategies for
those who are critical to the transaction and will need to be retained for some period of
time post-close to ensure deal success. The more these individuals can be identified in
advance, the more you can understand the impact from a retention planning perspective
(both in terms of retention levers to pull and the cost).
As the strategy takes shape, performance management should focus on how the current
team can deliver the potential future business, for example, by linking incentives to
meeting goals across both front and back office so that employees work with each other
to meet overarching company goals.
Consider an alternative approach: Identify the few individuals who will need to be involved
in the process. This is important for several reasons. First, it avoids unnecessary or
premature concern for other employees. Second, it is easier to manage the consistency
of your story to potential investors when working with a smaller group. Finally, the people
who will be critical to preparing for a potential transaction are likely the same people who
are most responsible for the underlying value to a buyer.
As an actual transaction begins to unfold, communication needs will shift. A larger circle
of employees may need to be involved in due diligence work. Yet, here again, knowledge
should be limited to the smallest possible number of employees.
Understanding the impact of the 2017 tax reform on the sale of your business is
essential to maximizing tax-related benefits. Each of these issues are factors with
tax consequences:
Minimizing ordinary income tax treatment in favor of long-term capital gain taxation is
preferred due to the significant rate differential of a top rate of 37% for ordinary income
as compared to 20% for long-term capital gain. Due to the complexities surrounding the
new tax law and of income tax in general, it is essential that the private business owner
engage with seasoned tax advisers to understand the best possible tax outcome. In
addition, depending on the structure of the transaction, the buyer can often generate
substantial tax benefits (via a tax “step up”), and therefore you, as the seller, should be
able to negotiate to share some of that value creation.
Effective planning enhances value in yet another way by allowing you to have the best Effective planning
available information to make an informed decision whether to accept an offer or to walk enhances value in
away. A sufficient time frame allows the company and its owner to: yet another way by
allowing you to have
• Demonstrate long-term relationships with customers and vendors.
the best available
• Institutionalize the business value. Ensure an effective management team is in place information to
long before a potential transaction, alleviating buyer concerns that the business value
make an informed
might be too dependent on the owner.
decision whether to
• Build a comprehensive strategic plan and a defined path for growth. The ability to accept an offer or to
articulate the story clearly engenders confidence in buyers and investors.
walk away.
• Put the financial house in order. Potential buyers are likely to scrutinize several years
of historical results to get a better understanding of the risks and rewards associated
with an investment and to benchmark for future performance. While a full audit may
not be a necessary requirement from a buyer, having a respected firm put together
a quality of earnings package on the historical financials signals a readiness and
seriousness to move ahead on a sale.
• Create quarterly and/or monthly management reports to help a future buyer understand
the metrics and performance indicators being used to manage the business.
• Develop a robust, aggressive (but defensible) operating and financial forecasting
model, likely with three years of projections. An external financial adviser can help to
pull this together if the business has not historically developed longer-term projections.
• Develop a story that shows how the business is differentiated. Demonstrate the quality
of earnings, cash flows and sustainable performance, and anticipate the questions
and concerns of potential buyers.
• Start considering who might be the ideal buyer and how they might value the
business. By better understanding a potential buyer’s philosophy and attitude about
what drives value, a seller can better understand how to best position those attributes
to maximize value.
• Evaluate the complexities of your balance sheet, legal entity structure and tax
landscape, and understand the options and alternatives for various deal structures.
• Realistically understand the strengths and weaknesses of the business. The better
understanding owners have of the warts (as well as the gems), the more prepared they
will be in discussions with a potential buyer.
• Formulate and implement a comprehensive sell-side due diligence process that will
position the owner to be better prepared for buyer skepticism, rigorous analysis
and negotiations.
We began to cover what’s involved with this shift in Making the decision to sell, because
we believe the earlier you step away from the day-to-day and study the business anew,
the more time you have to make potentially substantive changes that add to the value
of the business. In this section, our goal is to immerse you in the buyer’s world so that
they don’t all look the same to you. The variations in where buyers find value in your
business (and their operating philosophies post-close) may not loom large to you at the
moment, but they could play out in ways that leave you with very different options to exit
the business.
If you know you want to exit entirely, you’ll likely land on a “hard auction” to attract the
most buyers and weigh the best terms with the lowest risk of failure to close. Knowing
what information is more (or less) valuable to buyers will help you avoid pitfalls that can
delay or scupper a sale. On the other hand, you may want to maintain a role for a set
time in the business and seek a sale as a means to diversify or to raise additional capital
to grow, while still retaining the potential for further gains. If so, you’ll want to attract
investors, most likely from private equity, to act like partners in expanding the business.
Which one will allow you to own more? Which one might create retention or option
programs that are a better fit for your management? What is their track record in working
with other companies they’ve acquired?
Most owners of family-led businesses who do not plan to pass the business on to the
next generation will find that their only viable exit is to sell to a third party. There may be
financial and practical reasons why a management-led buyout is challenging in today’s
capital market. And while people may talk about an IPO as an exit from the business, it’s
really better characterized as a capital-raising event. Going public may permit an owner
to free up only a portion of the personal wealth that is tied up in the company, and a full
exit may take years or may never be achieved. Corporate partnerships or joint ventures
are also options to create access to capital to grow the business and may offer alternative
ways to extract some cash through a dividend, for example, but offer little in the way to
fully exit the business or diversify your risk.
The best choice for a private company owner will depend on many factors: personal
goals, the financial needs of the owner and the business, and the state of the industry, to
name just a few. Understanding the buyer universe will help you prepare for variations in
how you present and guide the process toward the right outcome for you.
Oftentimes, this decision stems from a potential buyer’s analysis that it is cheaper and
faster to buy an existing company than it is to build or develop their own from scratch. Our Roadmap for
Yet the analysis won’t stop there; cultural factors can make or break the integration post- an IPO report
transaction. Thus, strategic buyers will also consider retention and loyalty programs. found that most
We recently took a reading of how active corporate dealmakers assess the value they
executives who
achieved from transactions, and retention was seen as a key determinant success. Our
report found that most executives who felt significant value was destroyed in their latest
felt significant
acquisition also said they lost more than 10% of key employees following the transaction. value was
destroyed in their
When the synergies are significant, the strategic buyer is often willing to pay more, latest acquisition
especially when those anticipated benefits are specific to the buyer compared to others. also said they lost
In general, synergies are most potent when they can be realized quickly, carry less risk
more than 10%
as well as create cost savings. Vertical and horizontal integration strategies effectively
executed can open up significant value creation opportunities for buyers. When
of key employees
considering a strategic buyer, you will want to anticipate possible synergies in order to following
capture the potential value associated with them. the transaction.
Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of selling to a strategic buyer:
Advantages
• Likely to provide highest valuation in the near term, if convinced by the potential for
cost savings and synergies
• Likely to enable the entrepreneur to completely walk away (i.e., obtain the greatest liquidity)
• Typically, strategic buyers are very knowledgeable about the business, facilitating due
diligence and closing
• Less likely to be constrained by financing contingencies, which also facilitate due
diligence and closing
Disadvantages
• Management may lose autonomy, lose their job or have their roles diminished
• Possible negative impact on culture and morale
• May affect customer loyalty
• Potential leakage to those in your current ecosystem (suppliers, customers, etc.)
• As the owner will typically depart, future upside value is sacrificed (unless there is
significant stock or earnout consideration)
• Strategic buyers don’t necessarily subscribe to the private equity playbook for
acquisitions. Some move more slowly, raising risk of the acquisition being caught up in
bureaucratic delay or “decision paralysis”
• Concerns with providing access to competitive information, should the deal fall through
The size of the private equity market has grown substantially in recent years, surpassing
$2 trillion globally in “dry powder” capital that’s available to invest. Demand has
significantly exceeded the supply of high-quality investment targets. These factors have
considerably enhanced private equity’s competitiveness in the deals market. PE firms are
also starting to take a longer term investment horizon, and holding periods are increasing.
Part of this is due to the higher valuations they have paid in recent years, but also a
fundamental shift in the business model to more patient investing.
The most marketable businesses to a private equity buyer tend to be those with solid and
recurring cash flows, a defendable market position, strong cash conversion and healthy
organic and/or inorganic growth prospects. Strong credit markets and ability to leverage
are additional factors that enhance financial buyers’ competitiveness.
They may not be focused on synergistic opportunities from the immediate transaction
if the company is intended to be a platform for an industry acquisition strategy. Once a
portfolio company is acquired as a platform, private equity financial buyers become more
like strategic buyers in their approach and will look for other “bolt-on” acquisitions.
Though distressed funds constitute a smaller segment of the market, depending on the
reasons for the company’s troubles, operationally minded private equity buyers may be
interested in pursuing turnaround situations or deals with more complications.
To achieve their targeted investment returns, they will generally finance the acquisition
with significant leverage (additional debt). As a result, they are more sensitive to issues
such as management quality and depth, sustainable EBITDA (earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization) and free cash flow.
Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of selling to a private equity buyer:
Advantages
• More likely to provide owner with ability to stay on for a set period, diversify some of
their risk and potentially capture additional returns. This is known as “taking a second
bite of the apple”
• Provide access to “deep pockets” for acquisitions and other growth initiatives
• Current management/shareholders may retain upside potential via equity in the
new company
• Ample “dry powder” or unspent money across the private equity landscape (mid-
market firms and larger ones) as well as robust financing markets
• Current management/shareholders will likely maintain significant involvement in
direction and operations of the business
Disadvantages
• Likely expects continued involvement of owner in business in the short term. Heavy
debt load can transform requirements on management as margin for error shrinks
• Upside potential is dependent upon strong management direction and growth
• Heavy financial and operational reporting requirements (although this is largely good
discipline, as the demands can grate on a former owner)
• May take longer to fully understand the business during the exit process
Only you can decide which of the criteria are the most important in your definition of
value. While such a decision may not be simple or straightforward, gathering information
on the pros and cons of each option as well as the likely process that will need to be
undertaken is a smart way to help you reach such a determination.
A successful sale builds from a constructive mind-set and extends through a series
of disciplined steps
Telling the story of the future of the business is the foundation to a good exit process. The
right information—interpreted and presented correctly and directed strategically—unlocks
the basis for value and builds confidence in the projected performance.
1. Align the business 2. Select key management 3. Prepare financial 4. Get ready for
objectives with team participants reporting deep dives
sale objectives and retain trusted
deal specialists Monthly reporting, Unpleasant surprises
The sales process audit statements and can quickly derail
is disruptive for a Demonstrate the depth tax filings drive the buyer-seller
variety of people of management and deal details that both the momentum and
who make your capabilities to move to buyer and seller need deflate perceptions
business valuable. a close. to know. of worth.
Are you selling assets or stock? Know the All buyers will want to Act with precision once the
trade-offs to structuring options. know about retention and decision to proceed has
severance terms. been made.
All the key players on the team must pull in the same direction to decrease risk associated
with closing a sale. Conflicting signals compromise credibility and effectiveness by
creating confusion and doubt.
Where shareholders and management are not the same individuals, their interests during
a sale transaction may not always align perfectly. Key employees are usually your most
important asset, and their treatment and retention should be a paramount focus to ensure
a successful process. In our experience, it’s also important to capture their input and
address any concerns early on. Ample preparation time enables you to maintain control
of the process and to better anticipate and actively get ahead of potential deal issues and
keep the sale process on track.
As thinking turns to action, owners can focus their considerations on the right time to sell
with two thoughts in mind: (1) It is always best to avoid letting events dictate when you
must sell and (2) the best way to avoid dictation by events is to maintain readiness and
agility if an excellent opportunity arises.
The actual events triggering a sale can be a combination of market and personal
conditions, such as a highly favorable offer or a generational change in the business.
At the end of the day, owners should always regard the possibility of a sale as one of their
alternatives and be prepared by making sure everything they do generates and creates
shareholder value—whether they are selling or not.
For owners, the art lies in forming the optimal internal team. The right people must be
identified to gather information and interact with buyers. At the same time, the group
must be narrow enough to control the consistency of the seller’s message and minimize
overall distraction from day-to-day operations.
Generally, it’s best to keep the group as small as possible—typically, five to ten individuals.
Each will have a role to play and should be able to interact independently with potential
buyers as the sales process advances. A “need to know” determination will help minimize
errant communications and business disruptions. However, the owner must strike a
balance with the necessity of having the essential business knowledge on the team for
Closer to the time of a sale, a second diagnostic sets the stage for sale. Sometimes
referred to as sell-side due diligence or quality of earnings (QofE) report, this analysis
builds off the company’s financial statements—monthly reporting packages, audit
statements and tax filings, as examples—and captures how a buyer will view “normalized
earnings” and cash flows during diligence. A QofE analysis is standard in most divestiture
processes these days, and it also helps the seller organize the data and accompanying
story and drives the foundational thinking into the details that both the buyer and seller
will need to know to complete an effective transaction. Specifically, a QoE analysis
focuses on determining the underlying level of earnings generated by the business by
eliminating distortions from the actual reported results and establishing a maintainable
earnings trend. The review considers non-financial debt impacting future cash flows, off
balance sheet items, commitments and contingencies, or significant items that may affect
value and crystalize in the near future. Sell-side due diligence is no longer optional.
You want to be aware of any issues to ensure you are properly prepared before the
buyers’ own due diligence begins.
Further, the company will need to develop a robust set of financial projections on both
operating and financial metrics that will go beyond the one-year budget most companies
typically have in place. Instead it will show a minimum of three years and up to five years
of financial forecasts.
Comprehensive sell-side due diligence will take much of the mystery out of valuation
exercises. It should reflect considerations of the key drivers of the business from both the
seller’s and buyer’s perspectives. The process (1) helps identify areas that have deal and
value implications and (2) prepares and coaches management to appropriately address
the issues with potential buyers. Concise, knowledgeable responses are required to
answer fundamental buyer questions; anything less can detract from value and from the
overall transaction’s likelihood of success. Areas of focus typically include understanding
the quality of historical earnings, the components of both historical and projected
business trends, key customer and supplier relationships, working capital and capital
expenditure requirements, strength of the management team, potential synergies, and
technology and intellectual property issues, among others.
Thorough sell-side due diligence can help avoid a range of problems, including sellers
being blindsided by unanticipated issues, potential post-closing disputes and simply
failing to close the deal. Ultimately, the appropriate positioning of the information gathered
during the sell-side due diligence process often helps owners gain a higher sale price.
Today, data rooms are almost always online information hubs (rather than actual
rooms in attorneys’ offices) that present the key information a buyer needs in order to
begin judging value and underlying interest. Generally, online data rooms speed the
process, lower costs and better manage the information flow by, among other things,
differentiating access restrictions by buyer categories to block strategic buyers from
sensitive competitive information while opening the same information to financial buyers
and tracking review patterns and questions from buyers.
At all times in the evolving sales process, the seller must build strong yet credible
messages around quality of earnings underpinning projections for the future and develop
a dynamic due diligence process that best prepares it for buyers’ possible skepticism,
rigorous analyses and intense negotiations.
Strategic buyers often emerge from the same industry and seek a good fit with some
aspect of the seller’s business. For instance, this may include accessing new markets,
increasing market share and acquiring expertise, patents or know-how. When the
synergies are significant, the strategic buyer is often willing to pay more. A seller will want
to anticipate those synergies in order to capture its share of the potential value. Telling the
story from the buyer’s perspective can be very effective; not only is it helping buyers see
the synergies, but it also makes them feel like they are in the pole position.
If the expected buyer is strategic, then the story often deploys an understanding of
the benefits and costs of integration, including the potential opportunities, inherent
sales and distribution channel synergies, purchasing power increases, production and
administrative efficiencies, and working capital improvements.
Other types of buyers (particularly private equity) typically hunt for investment opportunities
in which they can use the benefit of significant financial leverage to improve returns, provide
financial support for the business as it pays down debt and grows, and then exit their
investment for a profit in the short to medium term. They are usually highly sophisticated
and flexible in terms of deal structure and are consummate professionals on execution.
For this type of buyer, the most marketable businesses tend to be those with solid cash
flows, strong management teams, growing markets, a defendable market position and
lower capital expenditure requirements. If the likely purchaser is private equity, the story
may focus on opportunities that could be accelerated and captured by a new infusion of
capital, such as add-on or tuck-in acquisitions or new product launches.
If the buyer and seller agree to an asset sale but find that a legal transfer of the assets is too
costly or administratively burdensome, the buyer and seller of an S corporation can achieve
the federal income tax consequences of an asset-based sale and the resulting step up to
the buyer by making a section 338(h) (10) election on a legal sale of S corporation shares.
Finally, while legal issues are not usually a focal point in a sell-side due diligence
report, reviewing the legal landscape of the business is an important part of pre-sale
preparation. The review should encompass customer contracts, vendor arrangements,
employee matters, potential or actual litigation, LE structure and related party
transactions. The data room should have supporting documentation as part of the effort
to help buyers conduct their reviews quickly.
All buyers will want to know about retention and severance terms, obligations to keep
executives for certain periods of time, payments to executives and employees triggered
by the transaction, potentially lost tax deductions on deemed parachute payments
imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 280G, collective bargaining agreements, and
defined pension benefit plans, as well as any other unfunded retirement obligations.
The equation can grow more complex if business units are carved out and sold apart
from the whole, when human resources and benefit costs allocated to these units may
not reflect expected costs on a stand-alone basis.
Beyond the inventorying of human resources programs and costs, owners need to
assess how the total human resources picture and associated compensation and
benefits programs will affect different types of buyers throughout the transaction life
cycle, extending even after closing. A buyer in the same industry may want to retain a
business’s head of sales or operations but not the chief financial officer or CEO and may
want to integrate the seller’s employees into its own benefit programs. Further, a strategic
buyer is more inclined to look for synergies and opportunities for further cost savings.
A financial buyer, which often seeks a plug-and-play deal (that is, a minimal need for
business or management changes post-close), will want to lock in and incentivize
an executive team to ensure continuity. Planning also varies by deal and industry:
Underfunded pension plans that will need large cash contributions in the short term may
take priority in one case, while the costs of settling existing equity compensation and
stock options loom large in another—for, say, a fast-growth IT start-up.
Owners can go a long way toward smoothing their path to sale by understanding their
own human resources environment early on and taking any needed steps to properly
communicate their program’s historical and future costs and, when possible, to realign
elements that would facilitate the deal.
At this stage, it’s critical that a seller actively exerts control over the elements they can
control. This seems like a simple concept, but it is a mandatory, deliberate commitment.
This installment explores ways you can maintain control over the sales process while
retaining the crucial advantage of speed—the two factors essential for an optimal outcome.
• Legal
• Deal structuring from a tax perspective
• Investment banking/capital structure
• Valuation guidance An effective process
• Telling the story, including extensive marketing materials and presentations protects confidential
• Buyer solicitation and management information,
Overseas investors solicitation and management. Many foreign companies and
maintains speed
•
sovereign wealth funds view the US as a growth opportunity and/or a more predictable by avoiding
market from an investment risk perspective unnecessary
Overall process management
and repetitive
•
explanations and
• Negotiation support
meetings, enhances
• Sell-side due diligence buyer interest,
• Accounting expertise allows increased
• Personal or estate taxes insight into the
buyer’s motives
• Specialty advice—for example, regarding environmental issues, risks or industry trends
and key interests,
To effectively use advisers, an owner must involve them early enough in the process to and—ultimately—
enable them to help influence the outcome. As often is the case, the further an owner enhances value
advances into a potential deal, the more limited the options become. and gives the
seller control over
2. Structure the deal from a tax perspective the process.
Sellers can lose significant value when entering the negotiation process without having
already considered the tax structuring options available.
Too often, a sale process has already reached the letter-of-intent stage before tax
advisers are consulted. At that point, many areas have already been preliminarily
negotiated and expectations set, and tax-efficient alternatives may no longer be
options. The owner may lose the chance to present beneficial structuring alternatives
to the buyer as well as the ability to capture the value inherent in any such change or
structure demands of the buyer. Furthermore, changing the tax strategy at this stage may
jeopardize the speed of close and put the underlying transaction itself at risk.
Developing tax strategies is one of the important ways an owner can remain in control of
the selling process. Do the work upfront to understand the different impacts of an asset
deal versus a stock deal and consider them in communications and negotiations up
front with buyers. Keep potential buyers’ motivations top of mind when developing tax
strategies. A regular example of this could be the 338(h)(10) election with a stock deal,
enabling a buyer to treat the transaction in a more favorable way for them and creating
a tax value benefit that can be shared by an educated owner. Particularly in light of the
recent tax reform, different buyers (e.g., US vs. non-US) may have different objectives,
and understanding your likely buyer’s motivations will aid the sales process. You will
have to navigate the complex mix of tax rates and the specific tax attributes of both the
business owner and the business to be sold when developing a tax strategy.
This can be a simple process for some companies but in cases where the likely buyer is
not obvious and the company’s lacking the necessary transactional expertise, it usually
makes sense to engage an investment banker who will proactively work to identify
potential acquirers across a wide range of regions and similar or tangential sectors. It
should be noted that as opposed to many other advisers who may work at an hourly
rate or for a fixed fee, an investment banker often requires a retainer and a success fee
based on a percentage of the proceeds from the transaction, but the intent is to create a
compensation structure that aligns the adviser’s and the seller’s interests.
Depending on the number of potential acquirers, a seller may opt to contact a handful
of specific buyers individually or to arrange an auction (a process by which the sale of
the business is marketed to multiple parties). Most sellers will try to focus their efforts
on 25 or fewer potential buyers and then narrow their focus to those who are the most
serious and whose proposed transaction terms are likely to be the most attractive.
In today’s market, flush with private equity capital, a well-run business will likely
have a range of interested parties. An investment banker may break the process into
segments to optimize the flow of information throughout the selection and preliminary
negotiation period.
If the potential buyer pool has been narrowed down to one or two parties, the seller
generally gives those potential buyers much of the information they request during a
confirmatory due diligence stage. But in an auction, the seller needs to manage the
information much more carefully until the number of potential buyers has been reduced
and the unqualified ones are eliminated. Value and certainty of close are two key
considerations when narrowing the field.
An increasingly common way for owners to do this is to hire outside experts to conduct
due diligence on the company before buyers come in. The third installment of this series,
Preparing the business for a sale, discusses the wide range of information expected by
serious buyers.
The extent of information and level of detail that is shared should be balanced, providing
enough information to enable buyers to determine a fair value but also limiting the amount of
sensitive or competitive information disclosed to anyone other than the ultimate purchaser.
But how is that balance achieved? And what information should be disclosed to whom?
The confidential information memorandum (CIM) aims to describe the company’s past,
present and future potential. It should present an upbeat but defensible description of the
company together with sufficient financial information to enable potential buyers to come
to a preliminary valuation. Past performance as well as near-term financial projections
(current and next year) is usually the key underpinning to future confidence.
The CIM contains an overview of the business, key growth opportunities, market share data,
background on management and competitive position. It also contains details on historical
and, in most cases, projected financial performance, product and business descriptions,
operations, and sales and marketing. An effective and well-written CIM can be a strong
facilitator in the selection phase of the selling process, while providing the seller with an
opportunity to add appropriate context to potential negative elements of the business.
Depending on the nature of the likely purchaser, a seller may not need to prepare a full CIM
but should nevertheless be prepared to assemble a comprehensive financial information pack
and data room to connect with plan with the relevant performance metrics. An investment
banker will typically take the lead role in drafting the CIM with assistance from management.
The bid instruction letter should generally allow a limited time by which interested parties
must respond with their preliminary indications of value and other conditions. Again,
if the owner is adequately prepared, it’s generally best to move fast. From a process
perspective, you will have the most leverage at this point, assuming multiple parties
are interested in competing for the company. Some buyers may ask for (or demand)
exclusivity to continue in the process. You and your advisers will have to carefully weigh
a request like this.
At the end of the stated period, you should hopefully have received responses from a
subset of those who received the CIM, with a range of indications of value. You may wish
to disregard those bidding below an acceptable minimum or may decide to keep some
of them to enhance competition. In a robust market reflecting strong competitive bidding
among buyers, the seller may be able to guide to a quicker binding offer date.
You may not want to make all information available from the beginning; instead, you
may prefer to withhold more sensitive details until later in the process, when the pool
of interested parties has narrowed again. In some instances, competitive or regulatory
constraints may require the use of a “clean room” to ensure that sensitive information
is not shared. Some sellers decide to wait until buyers themselves ask for certain
information before providing it—although this approach generally leads to a poorer
control dynamic around the process.
Management presentations
As the pool of suitors narrows, owners will invite them to a face-to-face meeting
with management.
The management presentation (which typically lasts two to four hours for each
potential bidder) will expand on information in the CIM and give buyers opportunities
to ask questions. Generally, you should try to limit the amount of management access
provided to buyers as a way of controlling the process as much as possible and to allow
management to continue focusing on running the business. Depending on the nature of
the business, many prospective buyers will also want a “site visit” at or around the time of
management presentations.
• Terms
Terms that are considered the most important differ on every deal and with every
seller. Terms could include non-compete consulting arrangements, management team
continuity, customer and community commitments, continued employment of family
members, and timing of the signing and closing. You must decide which terms are most
important to you. It will help differentiate between bids.
• Certainty to close
Given the effort you’ve undertaken and the resources you’ve expended as a seller, you
should consider the bidder with the greatest certainty to close. Things to bear in mind
include the bidders’ financial wherewithal, their reputations in the marketplace and
whether they have the ability logistically to get a deal done. If you’re not confident that
the buyer whose price and/or terms you most like can also follow through to a close, you
should be very hesitant to sign a letter of intent and provide exclusivity.
Letter of intent
Once you’ve settled on your final bidder, you’ll typically draft a letter of intent (LoI) that
sets out the key terms at a high level. Although an LoI is non-binding, it can be helpful
in laying out a baseline understanding of key terms to help move the parties closer to
signing. If many of the key areas have already been addressed in the letter, the final
bidder may simply confirm certain terms and ask for a period of exclusivity to finalize any
remaining due diligence with respect to a wide range of areas—such as financial, legal,
environmental, risk management, human resources and tax issues—while simultaneously
negotiating the purchase and sale agreement. The exclusivity period can typically range
from 30 to 90 days, with 45 to 60 days the norm. As a rule, buyers want longer exclusivity
and sellers want shorter, but keeping the buyer on an accelerated path helps mitigate risk
and reduce potential business disruption.
• Are the suggested terms too onerous and indicate your objectives at the outset can no
longer be achieved?
• Has the trust between the parties eroded through repeated retreading of previously
agreed terms?
• Do you foresee a poor relationship with the buyers post-close, so much so that the
required partnering will be difficult to achieve?
If the answer to any of the above is yes, you may find you’re not able to ultimately
consummate the deal. However, deals are by nature products of compromise. If you’ve
been managing the process effectively and have kept your optionality, you should feel
good about the decision to move forward to signing and closing.
What should you do now? Celebrate to be sure. But in short order, recognize that
managing wealth well is not too dissimilar to running a business successfully for many
years. You have alternatives to preserve wealth for a long time and/or ensure it flows
where you want it to in the most tax-efficient manner as possible. This is when business
gets personal.
The final section of this report is about the alternatives related to planning your financial
future and managing wealth. As we’ve discussed throughout, early planning and
preparation goes a long way with a very financially significant event like the sale of a
business. This includes tax planning. While value is hopefully at a maximum at the time
of the sale, transfer costs are also higher. Decisions made about the structure of the
transaction will factor now, as you plan your financial future outside of the company.
Minimizing ordinary income tax treatment in favor of long-term capital gain taxation is
preferred due to the significant rate differential of a top rate of 37% for ordinary income
as compared to 20% for long-term capital gain. Due to the complexities surrounding the
new tax law and of income tax in general, it is essential that the private business owner
engage with seasoned tax advisers to ensure the best possible tax outcome.
You will also want to weigh wealth transfer planning alternatives. There are different
types of trusts designed to ensure tax-efficient transfers of wealth; in addition, family
foundations, insurance options and retirement investment strategies are among the
decisions ahead.
A family office offers a unique way for a family to manage its wealth, maintain family
continuity and advance the family agenda. In the context of a family office, professional
advisers can help individuals identify and evaluate their current and future wealth
management objectives, increase tax efficiencies, reduce administrative costs and further
advance the family agenda.
• Determining the timing and structure of charitable gifts to increase the value of the
income tax deduction
• Evaluating investment transactions to determine a tax strategy for capital gain/
loss recognition
• Revising debt structure to increase the portion of interest expense eligible for current
income tax deductions
Research has proven that over 90% of a portfolio’s return performance is credited to
its asset allocation, thereby dramatically overshadowing other components, such as
security selection, adviser selection and market conditions. As a result, it is extremely
important that careful consideration be given to diversification of an investment portfolio
appropriately at the onset of the development of an investment strategy. Likewise, review
and follow up are important to ensuring that investments stay on track.
The goal of asset allocation is to make varied investments that move independently in
the market and create a diversified investment base. This diversification can be tailored
according to one’s time horizon, risk tolerance, need for liquidity, marketability and capital
appreciation. Asset allocation and diversification can help protect against the volatility of
the marketplace because various sectors of the market will outperform or underperform
at different times. However, it is important to note that diversification will not eliminate
risk. Market risk, otherwise known as systemic risk, will always be present when you are
investing in the market.
As a result, family goals and needs should play major roles in most, if not all, of your
wealth management and transfer decisions and actions. Your planning may need to
manage, and balance, the dynamics of marriages, children, grandchildren, stepchildren,
in-laws and others.
One of the most important things a will does is avoid intestacy, which is the situation
when an individual dies without a valid will. There is an old but true adage: “If you don’t
make a will, the state where you live will make one for you.” Each state has intestacy
laws that determine who gets our property and how much of it. In many states, these
laws are based on social benefits that were held perhaps a hundred or more years ago.
For example, your property generally would be split between your spouse and children,
and just how much your spouse might receive could depend on the number of children
you have.
A will cannot distribute non-probate assets (e.g., IRAs and life insurance), avoid probate
or change the statutory rights of a surviving spouse.
A revocable living trust (RLT) can serve as a valuable supplement to a simple will
A revocable living trust (RLT) can serve as a valuable supplement to a simple will. In an
RLT, a grantor contributes assets to the trust while retaining the right to revoke the trust
or reclaim ownership of trust property outright during life. Trust assets are not subject to
probate. An RLT accomplishes the following:
• Establishes an individual’s estate plan and directs assets at death, similar to a will
• Ensures the privacy of the decedent’s estate and of the surviving family members
• Avoids the administrative fees associated with probate
• Avoids probate in each state in which property is owned (advisable if the grantor owns
property out of their home state)
• Is a way to manage property for minors or incapacitated adults
• Facilitates funding of other trusts
Because the annuity is typically set such that the retained interest is essentially equal
to the fair market value of the assets transferred, the gift is de minimis. At the end of the
GRAT term, the remainder interest that passes to heirs is completely out of the grantor’s
estate. Because the present value of the remainder interest is calculated based on the
interest rate at the time the trust is established, GRATs can be especially effective during
periods of low interest rates. As of this writing, we are in one of the historically lowest
interest rate environments for this type of trust planning.
After setting up an IDIT, you would sell an asset to the trust in exchange for a promissory
note. The IDIT should be seeded (the gift component) before the sale with an equity
amount (generally 10% of the sale amount) that would substantiate the trust’s ability to
make payments on the loan. The terms of the promissory note would require the trust to
pay you an amount equal to the fair market value of the property at the time you sold the
asset to the trust, plus a fixed rate of interest as set forth monthly by the IRS. Similar to
GRATs, IDITs work best in a low interest rate environment. If the trust assets produce a
rate of return that exceeds the specified interest rate, the IDITs beneficiaries will receive
the excess either in trust or outright, at little to no gift tax cost.
Although the IDIT will be the legal owner of the asset, the grantor will remain liable for the
tax on the income earned in the trust, hence the trust is “defective” meaning yours for
income tax purposes but not for estate tax purposes. The reason an IDIT is nonetheless
an appealing option is that the income tax payment provides an income and estate
tax benefit for the trust beneficiaries. The tax benefit stems from the fact that what the
beneficiaries ultimately receive from the trust will not be diminished by the income taxes
generated by the trust, yet payment of the income tax by the grantor is not considered an
additional gift to the trust or to the beneficiaries.
The GST tax is in addition to potential estate or gift taxes on the same transfer. It is
designed to make sure that a tax is, in fact, collected on the transfer of wealth from
one generation to the next. A dynasty trust helps you take full advantage of your GST
tax exemption and is typically set up to last for as long as the state law governing the
trust allows.
A dynasty trust may be established either during your lifetime or through your will. It
allows you to set aside assets for your grandchildren and future descendants (while still
allowing for distributions to your children, if necessary) without paying gift, estate or GST
tax in each generation. These techniques are not always mutually exclusive so an IDIT
could also be structured as a dynasty trust.
In a charitable remainder trust (CRT), you would transfer assets to the trust and either
keep or give to others the right to receive an annual annuity or unitrust payment for a
specified number of years or for life. At the end of the term of the CRT, the remaining
assets pass to charity. The grantor receives a current charitable income tax deduction
at the funding of the trust equal to the present value of the remainder interest
actuarially calculated.
A charitable lead trust (CLT) essentially works in reverse. The charity is entitled to receive
an annuity or unitrust amount for a specified number of years. At the end of the term,
the remaining assets are returned to you or given to the non-charitable beneficiaries of
your choosing.
Upon creation of the CLT, the donor is allowed a charitable deduction for income tax
purposes provided that the donor agrees to be taxed on the trust’s annual income as it
is earned (Grantor CLT). If the donor chooses not to be taxed on the trust’s income, no
charitable deduction will be allowed nor will the donor be taxed on the trust’s income
(Nongrantor CLT). Instead, each year the CLT will file a tax return and be entitled to a
charitable deduction generally equal to the value of the annuity paid to charity to use
against the CLT’s own income.
Important gift tax and estate planning objectives can be achieved through the use of
a Nongrantor CLT. Typically, the transfer of property to a family member will result in
a current gift for gift tax purposes or will trigger estate tax upon the grantor’s death.
However, the gift or estate tax is lower with a CLT because the value is reduced by the
value of the income interest received by charity.
One popular reason for forming a FLP is to facilitate the transfer of wealth. That’s
because making gifts of partnership units to children or grandchildren, or setting up
trusts for their benefit, allows the passage of family wealth without losing any of the
sophisticated investment attributes available to large investment pools. Generally,
property is contributed into a FLP in exchange for both general and limited partnership
units. As a rule, the retained value of a general partnership interest will be small because
the objective is to transfer the bulk of the value (through the limited partnership units)
to younger generations. If the partnership is properly structured and administered,
gifts of partnership interests will not be included in the donor’s estate once those gifts
are complete.
Extra care should be taken when establishing family partnerships, as the IRS challenges
family partnerships that are not respectful of partnership tax laws. Additionally, the gifting
of limited partnership interests to family members often results in discounts for gift tax
purposes for both minority interest and lack of marketability concepts. The IRS frequently
challenges such discounts so proper attention to valuation concepts through the hiring of
a reputable appraisal firm is likewise important.
• Community foundations
A community foundation is a fund designed to attract assets for the benefit of a particular
geographic area. Community foundations are treated as public charities (not as private
foundations), so the donor has a large degree of flexibility both in structuring the gift and
in advising the foundation on how to benefit the surrounding community.
• Donor-advised funds
Donor-advised funds provide another way of retaining a degree of control over
contributions. Like community foundations, donor-advised funds are public charities.
Most financial institutions offer donor-advised funds which allow the donor to make
suggestions to the fund for future charitable grants. The donor receives an income tax
charitable deduction upon funding of the donor-advised fund.
Contact us:
© 2019 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to
the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for
general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. 614582-2020 DvL