Jurnal SHRM 2 - Ronald
Jurnal SHRM 2 - Ronald
Jurnal SHRM 2 - Ronald
https://www.scirp.org/journal/ojbm
ISSN Online: 2329-3292
ISSN Print: 2329-3284
DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2022.105124 Sep. 16, 2022 2461 Open Journal of Business and Management
K. Phiri, J. Phiri
Keywords
Organisational Performance, Organisation, Resourcing, Learning and
Development, Performance and Rewards Management, Employee Welfare
1. Introduction
The supposition on the practice of Human Resource Management (HRM) is that
the organisation’s most important resources are the people working in the orga-
nisation and that organisational performance largely depends on them. For
HRM to make meaningful impact on organisational performance, an appropri-
ate range of human resource policies and processes must be developed and im-
plemented effectively (Armstrong, 2008). Lawler and Mohrman (2003) also as-
sert that HRM practices should be an integral part of the strategy of any large
organization.
HRM practices are concerned with the management of people in an organisa-
tion from the time of recruitment until the time they separate from the organisa-
tion. Strategic human resource management (SHRM), knowledge management,
organisation development, resourcing, performance management, learning and
development, reward management and employee relations are some of the HRM
practices (Armstrong, 2009).
“Strategic HRM is an approach that defines how the organization’s goals will
be achieved through people by means of HR strategies and integrated HR poli-
cies and practices” (Armstrong, 2009: p. 29). Regardless of the definition con-
troversy, it can be clearly stated that the development of the concept of SHRM
has led to a significant revival of academic interest in HRM functions and a streng-
thening of both the theory and practice of human resource management. For ex-
ample, in the realm of theory, SHRM provided intellectual support for the idea that
people in an organization and the HRM system could provide a long-term source
of competitive advantage (Kaufman, 2007).
O’riordan (2017) described SHRM as an interface between HRM and strategic
management. In other words, it explains how the future development of an or-
ganisation and the achievement of its goals are supported by its human resource
policies and practices. Having a skilled, competent and ambitious workforce is
considered the basis of a competitive advantage, and SHRM encourages hiring,
supporting and training highly skilled employees.
This paper is arranged as follows: in Section 1.0 is the introduction, statement
of the problem and the conceptual framework. Section 2.0 consists of literature
review and the research methodology is in Section 3.0. The results and discus-
sion are presented in Section 4.0 which consists of demographic information of
the respondents, test of reliability, bivariate analysis and multiple regression analy-
sis. The conclusion is in Section 5.0, while Section 6.0 gives recommendations
and finally the limitations of the study are presented in Section 7.0.
Therefore, the researcher tried to examine the impact of SHRM practices on or-
ganisational performance (employee commitment, employee performance and
service delivery) by making specific reference to the National Assembly of Zambia.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework for analysing the impact of SHRM practices on organisational performance at the National As-
sembly of Zambia.
2. Literature Review
This section presents the literature review on strategic human resource man-
agement practices and organisational performance. The literature highlights vari-
ous view points and explanations on strategic human resource management and
organisational performance and the potential gaps that exist in successfully im-
plementing strategic human resource management practices.
Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States in the late 19th century. Ja-
pan experienced almost the same development about 10 years later (Kaufman,
2007). Armstrong (2014) also posits that an early reference to human resources
was made in the year 1966. Further, he explained that it was later stated that
“people are an important resource” in the organisation. However, HRM only
appeared in the 1980s through the works of what may be its founding fathers.
These were the American scientist Charles Fombrun and his colleagues in the
“Matching Model”, and Michael Beer and his colleagues in the “Harvard
Framework”.
HRM had a conceptual framework of underlying philosophies through a wide
range of theories. That is, from behavioural science to strategic management,
human capital and labour relations. HRM’s philosophy has been strongly criticized
by scholars for being business-oriented and operational, but it has become clear
that the term HRM has probably been adopted as a synonym for what was once
known as personnel management. Therefore, the criticism has decreased
(Armstrong, 2014).
The term SHRM evolved in the 1990s and is proactive and comprehensive in
human resource management, focusing on issues such as human resource man-
agement practices and alignment with organizational strategic goals, and incor-
poration of human resource management. A targeted, value-based approach has
become more meaningful in strategic approach to strategic organizational man-
agement, engaging senior management teams with HR functions, transferring
HR practices to line managers and adding value to employee compensation, se-
lection, performance evaluation, and organizational performance through HRM
(Gituma & Beyene, 2018). Future research on SHRM should focus on concep-
tually expanding the role of SHRM. Historically, SHRM has been seen as the in-
terface between HRM and strategic management. There are many studies fo-
cused on understanding the function of HRM (especially HRM practice), and
can be strategically adjusted to directly contribute to its competitive advantage
(Allen & Patrick, 2007).
ing on a daily basis. This means they work as part of the management team, en-
suring that HR activities continue to complement and bring value to the organi-
sation’s business strategy (Armstrong, 2014).
3. Research Methodology
The research design that was used in this study was quantitative survey design.
According to Kothari (2004), quantitative research is based on the measurement
of quantity or amount. It is applicable to phenomena that can be expressed in
terms of quantity. Quantitative is primarily used as a synonym for data collec-
tion techniques (such as questionnaires) or data analysis procedures (such as
graphs and statistics) that generate or use numerical data. Conversely, Survey
strategies allow the researcher to collect quantitative data that can be quantita-
tively analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Saunders et al., 2007).
Therefore, a predominantly closed-ended questionnaire was used to obtain the
where:
n = sample size,
N = population of the study,
e = margin of error percentage.
1200
n=
1 + 1200 × 0.07 2
n = 174.419
n = 174
Reliability Statistics
Construct
Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items
Organisation 0.841 6
Resourcing 0.732 6
Learning and Development 0.709 6
Performance and Reward Management 0.723 6
Employee Welfare 0.785 6
Organisational Performance Indicators 0.746 6
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Survey Data (2022).
Table 4 shows that the Pearson correlation coefficient on the correlation be-
tween learning and development and organisational performance was a strong,
positive correlation (r = .605, p = .001). With the p < .05, there was statistically
significant correlation between learning and development and organisational
performance.
Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficient between learning and development and Organi-
sational Performance.
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Survey Data (2022).
Table 5 shows that the Pearson correlation coefficient on the correlation be-
tween performance and reward management and organisational performance
revealed that there was a strong, positive correlation (r = .526, p = .001). With
the p < .05, there is statistically significant correlation between performance and
reward management and organisational performance.
A Pearson correlation coefficient was run as shown in Table 6, to determine
the correlation between employee welfare and organisational performance using
responses from the respondents. The results indicated that there was a strong,
positive correlation between employee welfare and organisational performance
(r = .457, p = .001). Since the p < .05, it means that there is statistically signifi-
cant correlation between employee welfare and organisational performance.
Table 7 illustrates that the Pearson correlation coefficient on the correlation
between all human resource management practices and organisational perfor-
mance indicated that there was a strong, positive correlation (r = .611, p = .001).
With the p < .05, there was statistically significant correlation between all human
resource management practices and organisational performance.
H6: There is a relationship between all Human Resource Management prac-
tices and organisational performance
The null hypothesis was therefore accepted since the results indicated that p
< .05 (see Table 11 for a summary of hypothesis results).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Survey Data (2022)
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Survey Data (2022).
Table 7. Pearson correlation between all human resource management practices and or-
ganisational performance.
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Survey Data (2022).
the dependent variable. The contribution of the independent variable to the de-
pendent variable is measured by the beta value and can be explained based on
the p or t value (Miranda & Fernando, 2020).
1 .663 a
.439 .421 .42428
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 1.274 .322 3.955 <.001**
Organisation −.064 .058 −,068 −1.119 .265
Resourcing .100 .094 .101 1.065 .289
Learning and Development .326 .095 .330 3.449 <.001**
Performance and Reward
.145 .073 .172 1.982 .049**
Management
The majority of the respondents, at 39%, indicated that their knowledge about
the National Assembly strategic plan was moderate. However, 38% and 8% in-
dicated that their knowledge about the National Assembly strategic plan was
good and very good, respectively.
revealed that the t value for resourcing was 1.065 which resulted in the null hy-
pothesis being accepted. In that regard, it was concluded that the aspect of re-
sourcing among strategic human resource management practices at the National
Assembly positively impacted organizational performance.
However, recommendations were made by the respondents on the need for
the National Assembly to implement inter-departmental support services, selec-
tive hiring and external recruitments. According to Millmore et al. (2007), re-
cruitment and selection is only part of the human resourcing practice but it is at
the centre of human resourcing in an organisation. The importance attached to
recruitment and selection is evident in the assertion that appointment decisions
are some of the most crucial ones ever taken by employers. Therefore, there is
need for Management at the National Assembly to improve on the aspect of re-
cruitment and selection in response to the finding of this study which showed
that despite resourcing having a positive impact on organisational performance,
the result showed a weak, positive impact.
5. Conclusion
The correlation results for this study established that there was a weak relation-
ship between organisation and organisational performance at the National As-
sembly. However, the correlation results showed a strong relationship between
resourcing and organisational performance. There was also a strong relationship
between learning and development and organisational performance. Further,
performance and reward management as well as employee welfare also showed a
strong relationship with organisational performance. In general, the correlation
results revealed that there was a strong relationship between all human resource
management practices and organisational performance at the National Assem-
bly.
Nevertheless, the multiple regression analysis results revealed that only 44% of
the observed legitimacy in organisational performance at the National Assembly
could be accounted for by strategic human resource management practices which
were depicted in the model for this study. This meant that 56% of the disparity
of organisational performance was related to other factors which were not in-
6. Recommendations
Based on the data that was collected during the study, the researcher was able to
formulate recommendations that may be useful to Management at the National
Assembly in the implementation of SHRM practices. The followings are the rec-
ommendation:
1) There is need for Management at the National Assembly to review the or-
ganisational structure in order to address the negative effect that it has on orga-
nisational performance as revealed by this study.
2) The National Assembly should break down organisational silos that exist at
the Institution. One way to do this could be by implementing inter-departmental
support services whereby departments are able to supplement each other when
there is a shortfall of manpower in one department. This can also give employees
an opportunity to experience working in other departments and it can also im-
prove employee skills and capabilities.
3) The National Assembly should have a deliberate policy on continuous pro-
fessional development as well as a succession plan policy. It is also important for
the National Assembly to orient all the employees on the operations of the In-
stitution. This is important because employees need to understand how their
work contributes to the success of the organisation.
4) There is also need for the National Assembly to devise a target setting sys-
tem which should inform the employee’s performance appraisal. The appraisal
system should also be responsive to the job descriptions and key performance
indicators and the strategic plan.
5) The National Assembly should have a deliberate policy on Institutional
transparency, employee engagement and access to information in order to dis-
courage hearsay and rumour mongering. Employees should also be allowed to
give feedback to supervisors and Management. This can be done through the use
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the participants in this study for their
valuable contribution and the National Assembly of Zambia for allowing the
author to conduct the study at the Institution.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this pa-
per.
References
Allen, M. R., & Patrick, W. (2007). Strategic Management and HRM. In P. Boxall, J. Pur-
cell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management.
New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Armstrong, M. (2008). Strategic Human Resource Management: A Guide to Action (4th
ed.). Kogan Page Limited.
Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong’s Handbook on Human Resource Management Prac-
tice (11th ed.). Kogan Page.
Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Prac-
tice (13th ed.). Kogan Page Limited.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Re-
search (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Darwish, T. K. (2012). Strategic Human Resource Management and Organisational Per-
formance: An Investigation in the Country of Jordan. Brunel University.
Darwish, T. K. (2013). Strategic HRM and Performance: Theory and Practice. Cambrigde
Scholars Publishing.
Gallo, A. (2015, November 4). A Refresher on Regression Analysis. Harvard Business Re-
view. https://hbr.org/2015/11/a-refresher-on-regression-analysis
Gituma, M., & Beyene, T. (2018). Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and
Organizational Performance: A Case of National Insurance Corporation of Eritrea
(Nice). Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Administration and
Management, 18, 1-14.
https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume18/1-Strategic-Human-Resource.pdf