Limitation 3
Limitation 3
Limitation 3
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA Sd/
===================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may
be allowed to see the judgment ? NO
===================================================
DAHIBEN D/O JAGABHAI RANCHHODBHAI & 2....Appellant(s)
Versus
ARVINDBHAI KALYANJI BHANUSALI (GAJRA) DECD. &
5....Defendant(s)
===================================================
Appearance:
MR NIKHIL S KARIEL, ADVOCATE for Appellant(s) No. 1 3.4
MS KJ BRAHMBHATT, CAVEATOR for Defendant(s) No. 1.1 1.3
MS VARSHA BRAHMBHATT, CAVEATOR for Defendant Nos.1.1 1.3
===================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Date : 19/10/2016
ORAL (COMMON) JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
Page 1 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 2 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 3 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 4 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 5 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 6 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 7 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 8 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 9 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 10 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 11 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 12 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
perfectly plain that the suit now pending before the First
Munsif's Court, Bangalore, is a flagrant misuse of the
mercies of the law in receiving plaints. The learned Munsif
must remember that if on a meaningful not formal reading
of the plaint it is manifestly vexatious, and meritless, in
the sense of not disclosing a clear right to sue, he should
exercise his power under Order VII, Rule 11, C.P.C., taking
care to see that the ground mentioned therein is fulfilled.
And, if clever drafting has created the illusion of a cause
of action, nip it in the bud at the first hearing by
examining the party searchingly under Order X , C.P.C. An
activist Judge is the answer to irresponsible law suits.
Page 13 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
set up by the defendant nor does it depend upon the
character of the relief prayed for by the plaintiff."
Page 14 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 15 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Page 16 of 17
C/FA/2324/2016 JUDGMENT
2016:GUJHC:46232-DB
Sd/
[A.S.SUPEHIA, J]
Bhavesh[PPS]*
Page 17 of 17