PDF International Development and The Environment Social Consensus and Cooperative Measures For Sustainability Shiro Hori Ebook Full Chapter
PDF International Development and The Environment Social Consensus and Cooperative Measures For Sustainability Shiro Hori Ebook Full Chapter
PDF International Development and The Environment Social Consensus and Cooperative Measures For Sustainability Shiro Hori Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/well-being-sustainability-and-
social-development-harry-lintsen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-eco-certified-child-
citizenship-and-education-for-sustainability-and-environment-
malin-ideland/
https://textbookfull.com/product/co-patenting-an-analytic-tool-
for-cooperative-research-and-development-hiroyasu-inoue/
https://textbookfull.com/product/green-civilization-human-
consensus-on-global-collaboration-for-sustainable-development-
xiaoxi-li/
International Law for Energy and the Environment
Patricia Park
https://textbookfull.com/product/international-law-for-energy-
and-the-environment-patricia-park/
https://textbookfull.com/product/social-accounting-for-
sustainability-monetizing-the-social-value-1st-edition-jose-luis-
retolaza/
https://textbookfull.com/product/greater-kenyir-landscapes-
social-development-and-environmental-sustainability-from-ridge-
to-reef-mohd-tajuddin-abdullah/
https://textbookfull.com/product/measures-of-positive-psychology-
development-and-validation-1st-edition-kamlesh-singh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/yearning-for-inclusive-growth-
and-development-good-jobs-and-sustainability-luigi-paganetto/
Sustainable Development Goals Series
Partnership for the Goals
Shiro Hori
Yukari Takamura
Toshiyuki Fujita
Norichika Kanie Editors
International
Development and
the Environment
Social Consensus and Cooperative
Measures for Sustainability
Sustainable Development Goals Series
Series Editors
R. B. Singh, Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics,
University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Suraj Mal, Department of Geography, Shaheed Bhagat Singh College,
University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Michael E. Meadows, EGS, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch,
Western Cape, South Africa
World leaders adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as part of the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Providing in-depth knowledge,
this series fosters comprehensive research on these global targets to end
poverty, fight inequality and injustice, and tackle climate change.
The sustainability of our planet is currently a major concern for the global
community and has been a central theme for a number of major global
initiatives in recent years. Perceiving a dire need for concrete benchmarks
toward sustainable development, the United Nations and world leaders
formulated the targets that make up the seventeen goals. The SDGs call for
action by all countries to promote prosperity while protecting Earth and its
life support systems. This series on the Sustainable Development Goals aims
to provide a comprehensive platform for scientific, teaching and research
communities working on various global issues in the field of geography,
earth sciences, environmental science, social sciences, engineering, policy,
planning, and human geosciences in order to contribute knowledge towards
achieving the current 17 Sustainable Development Goals.
This Series is organized into eighteen subseries: one based around each
of the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals, and an eighteenth
subseries, “Connecting the Goals,” which serves as a home for volumes
addressing multiple goals or studying the SDGs as a whole. Each subseries is
guided by an expert Subseries Advisor.
Contributions are welcome from scientists, policy makers and researchers
working in fields related to any of the SDGs. If you are interested in
contributing to the series, please contact the Publisher: Zachary Romano
[[email protected]].
Editors
International
Development
and the Environment
Social Consensus and Cooperative
Measures for Sustainability
123
Editors
Shiro Hori Yukari Takamura
Central Research Institute Institute for Future Initiatives
Fukuoka University The University of Tokyo
Fukuoka, Japan Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore
189721, Singapore
Preface
In the last few decades, development and environmental goals have been
integrated to create new sustainable development goals. For many years, the
main goals of the international community are related only to development.
To that end, the international community promoted economic development,
but many criticisms were raised as economic development does not always
improve people’s lives, and subsequently, sustainable development is now
emphasized instead.
In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development
(WCED) published a report, Our Common Future, which presented sus-
tainable development for the first time. After this report was published, by
balancing the development and the protection of the natural environment,
sustainable development has become a common approach for sustaining our
planet. The sustainable development is a concept from the past that is
important for the present and was defined as “development that meets the
needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs” in the WCED report.
This suggests that our generation is responsible for the well-being of
future generations. With climate change, current abatement efforts have not
directly yielded any visible improvements, but are expected to have future
benefits, for future generations.
In 2008, the OECD suggested that sustainable development requires a
consideration of the factors that influence the economics, the natural envi-
ronment, and the societies. Amongst them, society is the key driver of sus-
tainable development. The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16.7 calls
for “responsive, inclusive participatory and representative decision-making at
all levels”. A sustainable society is a society in which all stakeholders
understand the meaning of “sustainable development” and have a consensus
on the importance of respecting sustainable development. These approaches
and fully involving stakeholders in society are essential if the global devel-
opment goals are to be achieved.
The international climate regime is a typical case of a social dilemma in
which collective, cooperative actions under social consensus are inevitable
but difficult. This book aims to demonstrate the methods available to
effectively implement the international environmental frameworks using an
interdisciplinary analysis that includes law, economics and politics.
v
vi Preface
vii
viii Contents
ix
x Editors and Contributors
Contributors
Jie He is a postdoctoral fellow at the Graduate School of Law, Seinan
Gakuin University. His research interests include the international protection
of traditional medical knowledge, as well as China’s environmental law and
policy.
Mitsuru Kawamoto is currently Project Assistant Professor, Keio Univer-
sity Graduate School of Media and Governance, Japan. He is specialized in
international environmental law and governance. He is currently working on
UN Sustainable Development Goals with a particular attention to multi-scale
governance including the engagement of business enterprises for enhancing
the effectiveness of sustainable development governance. He has published
academic literatures on the concept of effectiveness of global environmental
treaty regimes, the changing functions of self-reporting under the climate
change treaty regime amongst others.
Qian Li is a doctoral course student at the Department of Economic Engi-
neering, Graduate School of Economics, Kyushu University. Her research
interests include game theoretic analyses of international environmental
agreements and empirical analyses of carbon emissions and economic growth.
Tomoaki Watanabe is Associate Professor of Faculty of Socio-
Environmental Studies, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan. His cur-
rent research interests include global environmental politics, private certifi-
cation schemes, political process of the European Standardization System in
and the Basel convention on transboundary movement of hazardous waste.
He is a member of the International Studies Association, International
Political Science Association, Japan Association for Environmental Law and
Editors and Contributors xi
Shiro Hori
10
1
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
GDP/capita ($)
agreed in 2015, known as the Paris Agreement social assets is emphasized because current
on Climate Change. environmental problems cannot be solved by a
The CO2 that is fueling climate change is few privileged actors, and many stakeholders’
produced by various economic activities: 21% by contributions are needed. The presence of social
industries, electricity and heat generation pro- assets influences the development of cooperation.
duce 25%, agriculture and forestry contribute The World Development Report 2003 stated that
24%, transportation adds 14%, and 16% is due to social assets promote the accumulation, preser-
other sources. Thus, one feature of climate vation, and productivity of environmental and
change is that it is different from historical air human assets. Social assets can improve the
and water pollution, whereas climate change is management and productivity of watersheds to
caused by accumulated pollution. Therefore, generate agricultural production (World Bank
current abatement efforts do not directly yield 2003). Thus, social assets have a key function in
visible improvements. Current abatements are promoting the value of environment assets.
expected to have future benefits because it takes Simon Kuznets demonstrated that historical
about 100–300 years to stabilize GHG concen- pollutants (such as sulfur oxide and smoke)
tration levels, several hundred years to stabilize related to economic development could be illus-
temperatures, and several hundreds to thousands trated as an inverted U-shaped curve, which
of years for sea levels to stabilize (IPCC 2001). became the famous Environmental Kuznets
Those of us alive today will not experience the Curve (EKC). According to the curve, environ-
effects of our abatement efforts, but we are mental problems worsen as an economy grows,
responsible for future generations. That value but, at a certain point in that economic devel-
requires a new social norm. opment, the environmental problems stop wors-
ening and begin to improve in response to the
application of progressively environmentally
1.1.5 Role of Social Assets friendly technologies and enforcement of envi-
ronmental regulations. However, the quantity of
The assets that are important to sustainable waste and the GHG emissions monotonically
development are environmental assets, such as increase throughout the period of economic
water, air, forests, and so on. However, social growth or, if a turning point occurs, that point is
assets, such as trust, commons, and voluntary at a high growth level. That difference is because
participation in communities, also are important waste and GHG environmental problems are
to consider (World Bank 2003). The value of caused by numerous polluters/pollutants, some of
8 S. Hori
which are difficult to regulate. Consequently, support the people (Mexico 1995). This obser-
abatement measures heavily depend on stake- vation suggests that social capital might increase
holders’ voluntary efforts. Obtaining the coop- happiness. Narayan (2000) summarized the
eration of all the relevant stakeholders is function of social capital as follows: “At the
achieved by establishing trust and social norms. community level, cohesion is an asset that pro-
Consensus could create new types of rules or vides security, regulates behavior, and improves
norms based on social assets, and the next sec- the standard of living of the community as a
tion examines the key actors needed to realize whole in matters that include but are not limited
consensus and common rules. to material wealth.” Putnam (1993) pointed out
that social cohesion and civic engagement are
practical preconditions for improved schools,
1.2 Society and Sustainable safe streets, rapid economic growth, effective
Development government, and public health. Social capital
also increases opportunities for economic value.
Many communities have traditional ways to Trust is a key element of social capital and has
sustainably use their natural resources. For a positive influence on economic development
example, in Japan, satoyama (border zones or because trust in one’s counterparts promotes
areas between mountain foothills and arable flat smooth interactions. Trust and confidence within
land) have been used according to community and between enterprises moves business prac-
rules. Satoyama is owned and managed by the tices forward. Social capital increases the pro-
community, and the community members have duction of physical capital through inter-firm
the right to use the forest products. Similar sys- social contact by means of interpersonal net-
tems are observed in other societies. For exam- works in an industry, which positively influences
ple, in Indonesia, the Sasi system is a popular knowledge acquisition (World Bank 2003).
way to traditionally manage natural resources Many developed countries have judicial and
sustainably. In the Pacific Islands, communities legislative infrastructures that function regardless
manage their fishing resources, and because of of the extent of trust, but many developing
their management system, they greatly benefit countries have no official ways to ensure trust
from maintaining their sustainable resources (Todo 2015). Consequently, the relationship
(UNDP 2005). between trust and economic development is more
These group rules can be established based on obvious in developing than in developed coun-
trust among the people. When they are unwritten tries. Ishise and Sawada (2009) found that the
and informal, they are social norms maintained social earning rate is larger in developing than in
through mutual trust. Interpersonal networks, developed countries.
shared values, and trust characterize the social A formal legal system with a social infras-
capital of these communities and form the tructure is a type of artificial social capital.
foundation of social norms. When social capital Legislated norms (laws) function to govern
is easily realized, voluntary cooperation among people’s activities and behaviors. In addition to
members is easily realized (Putnam 1993). The these laws, social norms have the role of pro-
social capital proposed by Putnam has become a viding rules of behavior for the public. On the
widely popular concept for understanding and one hand, laws are enforced by the legal system.
promoting development. On the other hand, social norms are enforced by
Social capital strengthens the cohesion of the individual and public conscience, which is
communities and promotes personal satisfaction. fostered in community.
Social capital develops in cultures with respected The 2015 Education World Forum declared
rules. Indigenous Mexicans, despite their deep that a “high quality education provides healthy
poverty, seem to be happier than other poor and satisfactory lives and capacity for
people because their traditional communities decision-making based on information” that
1 Development and the Environment: Society, Business … 9
leads to sustainable development. This statement enrollment rates has had an unwelcome unin-
coincides with evidence that personal awareness tended consequence. To increase the number of
promotes environmental improvements. teachers, wages were cut and training was
Historically, public knowledge about the reduced, which decreased interest and motivation
influence of serious air pollution on serious in teaching as a career because of the lower
health problems has encouraged industries and salary and lack of training. The quality of edu-
governments to act to prevent pollution. In cation suffered.
Kitakyushu, Japan, many heavy industrial man- For example, in Bangladesh, about one-half of
ufacturing plants were built in the 1900s, and, 11-year-old children cannot write even the sim-
then, air pollution worsened. In 1951, women plest characters or numbers. In India, about
lived around a particular factory appealed to the one-half of the teachers do not attend class dur-
polluters to take appropriate abatement measures. ing their required teaching periods (Chaudhury
Simultaneously, a women’s group that mostly et al. 2006). To address these problems, com-
comprised mothers conducted a survey about the munity involvement was emphasized because the
pollution’s level and distance from that factory. residents’ cooperation with and support of
About 6000 families provided convincing evi- teachers and schools, and parents’ involvement,
dence that the amount of pollution depended on encourage teachers to actively participate.
proximity to the factory. In response, the In this context, community-based school
municipal government set up a committee com- management has been implemented to improve
prising the government, citizens, and the pollut- the situation. In Niger, the Schools for All pro-
ing company to discuss and develop consensus gram aimed to support educational development
on monitoring, gathering data, and abatement through community participation. This program
measures. Historically, the progress of pollution began in 2004 to improve children’s educational
abatements has depended more on municipal situations by increasing the active participation
governments and citizens than on the central of their parents, teachers, and communities. The
government. The negotiation capacity of the program has spread to about 40,000 schools
people is effective for pollution abatement across Africa (JICA 2018). Many studies have
(Zwickl and Mosr 2014; Pargal and Wheeler found that community-based education lowered
1996). In the communities, people with appro- dropout rates. A study conducted in Burkina
priate knowledge and attitude have had leading Faso found that the dropout rate of 28.8% among
roles in the efforts. The awareness of the air sixth-grade boys was only 12.5% at the
pollution problem is higher in women than in community-based school participating in the
men, in higher HDI countries (UNDP 2011). Schools for All program (Kozuka et al. 2016).
Appropriate educational opportunities ensure that Proactive public participation has widely been
accurate knowledge is disseminated. adopted at all stages of the development process.
The relationship between education and eco- Community-driven development (CDD) is part
nomic development is quite clear, and the of many development programs. One recent
increasing school enrollment rates is the key; survey found that, after introducing CDD and
indeed, pupils who are not enrollments decreased deep community involvement into a develop-
from about 120 million in 2000 to 60 million in ment program, several development outcomes,
2011 (United Nations 2014). However, that is including resource sustainability, infrastructure
not the same as improving the quality of educa- quality, and insurance services, had improved
tion. For many years, the quantity of education (UNDP 2015). This approach relates to the
has been the focus, and building schools and notion of inclusive growth, and the idea of
increasing the number of teachers have been the comprehensive development and growth is
goals. However, focusing on increasing another related topic. Actual sustainable
10 S. Hori
development must focus on human well-being. Gunay (2011) demonstrated that Turkish com-
Further, well-being for today must include the panies performed CSR based on culture and
well-being of future generations (UNEP UNU strategic plans; and Roxas and Coetzer (2012)
2012). This is the same message as the message revealed that Philippines’ companies’ behaviors
at the end of Sect. 1.1.5. were significantly influenced by small
communities.
On the other hand, the development in the
1.3 The Business Sector global supply chain is the standardizing of
and Sustainable Development business behaviors to meet international stan-
dards. Global business behavior is regulated by
An important group of actors and stakeholders in the International Organization for Standardiza-
sustainable development is a society’s business tion (ISO). ISO 14000 was established as an
(particularly industrial) sector. Business sectors environmental audit standard and ISO 26000
are increasingly paying attention to sustainable concerns CSR. Furthermore, the ISO expanded
development. Businesses have been involved in business opportunities because of the market
the natural environment since about the 1960s, expansion resulting from standardization. For
when they began pollution abatements in example, to promote environmentally friendly
response to governmental regulations against city planning, the ISO 3750 series was estab-
pollution. Since the 2000s, many types of busi- lished. Low-pollution electricity infrastructure
nesses have begun to take responsibility for the standards can contribute to environment-friendly
natural environments that they influence, and electricity by popularizing these standards.
voluntary eco-friendly activities have become A market-led strategy is an effective way for
popular. This is known as corporate social companies that want to grow to realize sustain-
responsibility (CSR). CSR identifies corporate as able development.
responsible members of society. One well-known Daikin Industries Ltd. is a well-known Japa-
framework is Responsible Care®, initiated by nese air conditioner manufacturer that intends to
Chemistry Industry Association of Canada in expand its energy-saving air conditioner into the
1985. Responsible Care® is active with chemical Chinese market in collaboration with Gree
companies in 68 countries. Electric Appliances Inc. (the largest air condi-
CSR began in the early twentieth century for tioner manufacturer in China) and has started
four reasons: (1) companies have responsibilities producing energy-saving air conditioners in
because of their societal power and influence; China. This alliance contributed to the expansion
(2) companies seek to free their activities by of energy-saving appliances (the inverter-type air
abolishing excess regulations and reducing costs; conditioners share was 7% in 2009 and increased
(3) social action creates some benefits for com- to 67% in 2017) and improved the efficiency of
panies; and (4) social effects on stakeholders are China’s energy standard. HFC refrigerant (i.e.,
the responsibilities of companies (Post et al. hydro-fluoric-carbons), which is a refrigerant
2002). Currently, corporations are motivated to used for air conditioners, is a GHG. The Kigali
express CSR to improve their marketability, for Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (effective
political reasons, and in response to the pressures from January 2019) aims to reduce the effects of
of social norms (Kitzmaueller and Shimshack HFC. Daikin Industries Ltd. owns R32 technol-
2012). Marketing is an important motivator ogy, which is a refrigerant with a low global
because profits are made in the market. Politics warming potential. By offering and diffusing this
pressure companies to comply with CSR, but the technology in the market, Daikin Industries Ltd.
social norms are embedded in cultures. Many is helping to slow global warming effects. The
studies have examined this topic. For example, company widely promotes air conditioners with
Duarte (2010) found that, in Brazil, CSR was R32 and also strives to prevent refrigerant leak-
influenced by Brazilian culture; Katrinli and age. These efforts are supporting the
1 Development and the Environment: Society, Business … 11
implementation of the Kigali Amendment’s goal Similar activities toward achieving sustainable
of 85% reduction in global warming effects. This societies are widely implemented at the global
trend further suggests that climate-related tech- level. CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)
nologies in the market would promote businesses was initiated by an institutional investor and the
and environmental improvements. private sector to encourage companies to disclose
As mentioned above, many chemical compa- information about themselves and climate
nies are involved with sustainable development. change. 7,018 companies in the world are vol-
Responsible Care® is committed to action behalf untary disclosing in this program. According to
of the natural environment, safety, and public CDP, environment-related activities can be
health in all of its chemical production processes. identified in each company. For example, report
Many chemical companies also are committed to of Toyota Motor Corporation believes that the
sustainable societies. The Japan Chemical natural environment and costs are the key factors
Industry Association (JCIA) published report for for companies to assess their business plans.
the chemical industry’s contribution to sustain- CDP’s international program helps companies to
able development in 2017 (Fig. 1.4). For exam- perceive environmental issues as business
ple, Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd applied to opportunities or risks as well as ways to judge the
provide solutions for sustainable tree toward financial sector.
implementing the 17 SDG goals. All of the According to the results of a survey on com-
employees in the company were encouraged and panies that had participated in the UN Global
motivated to achieve the goals. Sumika Sustain- Compact (GC), the key motivators of participation
able Solutions is contributing to the creation of a were mimetic pressure to imitate other companies
sustainable society by certifying products that and normative pressure, not the coercive behavior
reduce GHG and promote the SDGs. For exam- of governmental interventions (Perez-Batres et al.
ple, the invention of a separator for lithium bat- 2011). Norms are one of the important factors
teries contributes to energy and climate change driving behavior in the business sector. The Paris
goals. These certifying products are expected to Agreement on Climate Change emphasized the
reduce CO2 by 53 million tonne by 2020. This is role of businesses for climate change because
an example of the way that the business sector is accumulating the members’ commitments to the
combining SDGs with their activities and sus- Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) could
tainable development. not achieve two-degree target. The international
business alliances aiming to influence the progress forums on sustainable development to achieve
of climate change and enhance sustainable devel- SDG success.
opment are expected to be relatively more impor- The United Nations’ efforts toward sustain-
tant, and these businesses are expected to be able development began with the MDGs in 2000,
motivated by social and economic norms to join which comprised seven development goals.
forces. Then, in 2015, the 17 SDGs built upon the
foundation of the MDGs. The 17 goals include
four environment-related goals. SDGs only set
1.4 The International Community goals, so rules and assessment methods must be
and Sustainable Development established. Goals are achieved through appro-
priate evaluative processes based on the SDG
International society is moving forward to meet benchmarks and standards. To achieve the SDGs,
the challenges of sustainable development. In cooperation across organizations is necessary.
1992, the UNCED adopted Agenda 21, United For example, IEA in collaboration with the
Nations Framework Convention on Climate World Bank assumed the role of a global track-
Change (UNFCCC), and the Convention on ing framework to consider the benchmarks for
Biological Diversity (CBD). In 2002, in Johan- energy supply set forth in SDG 7.
nesburg, the World Summit for Sustainable From the above discussion, it is clear that the
Development (WSSD) was held and the Johan- international community agreed on many treaties
nesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development and initiatives. However, many disputed issues
was adopted, which covered environmental and remain for the international community to solve.
poverty issues and appealed for access to clean One dispute began in 1992 when UNCED stipu-
water, sanitation, energy, and food. The Joint lated the common but differentiated responsibility
Plan of Implementation is the WSSD’s core (CBDR) in the UNFCCC, meaning that all coun-
outcome. The Type 2 Partnership promotes tries would share responsibility for maintaining
partnerships among non-state actors (such as sustainable development, but the weights of such
private sectors, business communities, and civil responsibility would vary among countries.
societies). Education on sustainable development Anthropologic CO2 is accumulated industrial
was adopted. releases that occurred since the Industrial Revo-
In 2012, the United Nations Conference on lution, and developed countries were identified as
Sustainable Development (UNCSD) was held to responsible for it. However, projected future
adopt The Future We Want, and it indicated that accumulations direct attention to China, whose
the SDGs would be introduced when the MDGs total emissions are higher than Japan’s. As such,
were met. The idea of green economies was stock-based environmental issues differ depend-
agreed to for improving environmental quality, ing on the past, present, or future perspective.
peaceful and healthy lifestyles, economic devel- Another controversial issue is the status of the
opment, and to encourage investments to support market. In the UNCSD, some countries insisted
the natural environment and social issues. The that the market is accelerated private investment.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Using the market as a tool to compel companies
Development (OECD) proposed green growth in to take sustainable actions is a useful strategy
2011 similar to the green economy idea. Thus, (Baker 2016). However, the South American
the OECD and the United Nations Environment countries have opposed this by arguing that
Programme (UNEP) formed an alliance to initi- market-oriented policies link co-modification of
ate green economies. The Future We Want nature. A third issue is the free-rider problem. In
describes the green economy as an important tool the flexible regime, there are no negative con-
for the international community to promote sus- sequences for noncompliance, and some coun-
tainable development and high-level political tries sabotage their obligations. Even in the case
1 Development and the Environment: Society, Business … 13
of international treaties, many countries do not different interests and attitudes based on culture,
fulfill their obligations to report. To avoid these race, social system, geographical features, and
problems, stable social norms among the mem- level of economic development. The interna-
bers are needed based on a common sense of tional community needs to find common ground
fairness, reciprocity, and trust among members. on which the members can reach consensus. That
Transparency and accountability with accurate common ground becomes the group’s social
reporting and reviewing are considered common norm.
ground for a foundation of trust among the To conserve global public goods, the interna-
members (Hori 2015). To achieve common tional community needs environmental treaties
ground in the international community, fairness, and agreements. These agreements intend to
reciprocity, and trust are key attitudes to develop. ensure implementation through obligations and
punishment for noncompliance. However, imple-
mentation methods have changed over time with
1.5 Social Norms in Sustainable the increase in developing country members. The
Development UNFCCC was established in 1992, and it took
23 years to reach an agreement to which all of the
The terms “social norm” and “consensus” fre- participating members would commit. According
quently appear in this chapter because they are to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change,
key social concepts for achieving sustainable members commit to a contribution intending to
development. A characteristic of the natural prevent climate change. In this type of organiza-
environment is that it represents “public goods.” tion, social norms are expected to have important
For example, regarding climate change, individ- roles. Climate change negotiations are typical of
ual activities producing CO2 might not harm the social problems that arise (Gsothbauer and van
some individuals or stakeholders, but they dam- den Bergh 2012).
age the global climate. The activities damage The motivation to respect the organization’s
public goods by seizing and consuming the social norms is signaled to others (Posner 2000).
common resources without providing compen- Theoretically, individuals are concerned about
sation for them. Thus, an agenda on public goods their reputations, so they want to send signals
developed. A well-known theory is the tragedy that enhance their reputations. For example, to
of commons: The commons without rules or understand the efforts to reach an agreement on
management invite excess consumption that the Paris Agreement on climate change, the roles
eliminates sustainable uses. One proposed mea- of China and the USA should be emphasized. In
sure in response to this problem is to tax impo- 2014, these two biggest contributors to climate
sition; however, from the perspective of change agreed to proceed toward an agreement.
governance in developing countries, it seems China, since the 1999 Copenhagen Accord, had
unrealistic (Todaro and Smith 2015). changed its attitude because its reputation in the
On the other hand, the commons is not always international community had changed (see
excessively consumed. Forests managed by Chap. 6).
communities are appropriately consumed. The international framework developed not
A commons under the control of its members’ only as a multinational structure, but also as a
consensus can implement sustainable develop- private base. CDP, GC, and other frameworks
ment practices. Communities and business asso- have encouraged companies to take important
ciations easily establish rules because the steps toward sustainable development. Social
members of these groups tend to share common norms are expected to be more important than
interests. On the other hand, the international laws for achieving action in the desired direction.
community is comprised of many countries with Furthermore, social norms are linked to people’s
14 S. Hori
behaviors. Environmental behavior and IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001—IPCC third assess-
energy-saving behavior positively relate to ment report
Ishise H, Sawada Y (2009) Aggregate returns to social
compliance with social norms. capital: estimates based on the augmented Solow
model. J Macroecon 31(3):376–393
JCIA (2017) Challenge and contribution by chemical
1.6 Summary industry toward sustainable development. https://
www.nikkakyo.org/system/files/sdgs_TFreport2017.
pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2018)
The roles of society, businesses, and the inter- JICA (2018) “School for All”: improving children’s
national community in sustainable development learning through collaboration among parents, com-
must be emphasized. To develop sustainable munities and schools. https://www.jica.go.jp/english/
our_work/thematic_issues/education/study.html
societies, their interrelationships are important. Katrinli A, Gunay G (2011) Corporate social responsi-
Communities’ sustainability depends on the bility, strategy and culture: Bati Anadolu group case.
social norm of the communities. Norms are Int J Bus Strategy 11(2):32–36
strengthened by trust among community mem- Kitzmaueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspec-
tives on corporate social responsibility. J Econ Lit 50
bers and the extent of individual members’ (1):51–81
awareness. An effective framework for the Kozuka E, Sawada Y, Todo Y (2016) How can commu-
international community is its pathway toward nity participation improve educational outcomes?:
sustainable development, which includes the Experimental evidence from a school-based manage-
ment project in Burkina Faso. JICA research institute
development of consensus and social norms. working paper 112. JICARI, Tokyo
Mexico (1995) The people’s voice: Mexico—participa-
tory poverty assessment
References Narayan D (2000) Voices of the poor: can anyone hear
us? Oxford University Press, New York
New York Times (2002) 2 June
Baker S (2016) Sustainable development. Routledge, Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Informal regulation of
New York industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence
CDP (2018) Growth in disclosing companies, https:// from Indonesia. J Polit Econ 104(6):1314–1327
www.cdp.net/en/scores (accessed 10 April 2019) Perez-Batres Luis A, Miller VV, Pisani MJ (2011)
Chaudhury N, Hammer J, Kremer M, Muralidharan K, Institutionalizing sustainability: an empirical study of
Roges H (2006) Missing in action: teacher and health corporate registration and commitment to the United
worker absence in developing countries. J Econ Nations global compact guidelines. J Clean Prod 19
Perspect 20(1):91–116. (8):843–851
Duarte F (2010) Working with corporate social respon- Posner EA (2000) Law and social norms. Harvard
sibility in Brazilian companies: the role of managers University Press, USA
values in the maintenance of CSR culture. J Bus Post JE, Lawrence AT, Weber J (2002) Business and
Ethics 96:355–368 society: corporate strategy, public policy, ethics, 10th
FAO (2017) The AQUASTAT database. http://www.fao. edn. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., p 634
org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=ene Putnam RD (1993) Making democracy work: civic
Gsottbauer E, van den Bergh JCJM (2012) Bounded traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press,
rationality and social interaction in negotiating a Princeton
climate agreement. Int Environ Agreements Polit REN21 (Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st
Law Econ 13:1–25 Century) (2011) Renewable 2011 global status report,
Hori S (2015) Member state commitments and interna- Paris
tional environmental regimes: can appeals to social Roxas B, Coetzer A (2012) Institutional environment,
norms strengthen flexible agreements? Environ Sci managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability
Policy 54:263–267 orientation of small firms. J Bus Ethics 111(4):461–
IEA (2009) Energy balances of non-OECD countries 476
IEA (2015) Special report on energy and climate change, Todo Y (2015) Introductory to development economics.
Paris. https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2015-special- Saiensu
report-energy-and-climate-change Todaro M, Smith SC (2015) Economic development.
IEA (2017) World energy outlook Pearson Education Limited, UK
1 Development and the Environment: Society, Business … 15
United Nations (2014) The millennium development WHO (2018) Ambient air quality and health. www.who.
goals report 2014 int/en/news-room/factsheets
UNDP (2005) Human development report World Bank (2000a) Voices of the poor
UNDP (2006) Human development report World Bank (2000b) World development report
UNDP (2011) Human development report World Bank (2003) World development report
UNDP (2015) Human development report World Bank (2011) World development indicators
UNEP UNU (2012) Inclusive wealth report: measuring Zwickl K, Mosr M (2014) Informal environmental
progress toward sustainability. United Nations envi- regulation of industrial air pollution: does neighbor-
ronment programme; international human dimensions hood inequality matter? Ecol Econ working paper.
programme on global environmental change Vienna University of economic and business, Vienna
WHO (2005) Water for life: making it happen. Joint
monitoring programme for water supply and sanita-
tion, Geneva
Sustainable Development Goals
and International Governance: 2
Indicators as a Key Mechanism
for Success
Norichika Kanie
Just over three years have elapsed since they The purpose of this paper is to encourage
were adopted, and in some countries—Japan consideration of the SDGs from the perspectives
included—there is a sense that interest in the SDGs of measurement and indicators, that is, mea-
is rising quickly. It is particularly in local gov- surement of progress with the SDGs. First, as a
ernments and the corporate world where the starting point, after clarifying what kind of
interest seems to be rising the most. However, the governance is required for the SDGs, the paper
essence of the SDGs is a transformation of gov- will discuss the roles and functions of mea-
ernance, so if the SDGs are truly going to be surements and indicators in connection with the
implemented, traditional approaches need to SDGs and from the perspective of governance in
change significantly. Despite this, there is still a particular. Then, while reviewing targets and
sense that few actors have noticed this point. The indicators related to resource circulation, the
SDGs are articulated as desired future conditions, paper will consider the ideal design of SDG
so by looking at that those conditions we can then indicators.
do “back-casting” to the present in order to con-
sider the required next steps. Because actions
arrived at by back-casting differ significantly from 2.2 SDGs and Governance
the current situation, the UN goals do not specify
implementation steps in detail. Rather, they leave With the adoption of the indicators in July 2017,
future initiatives up to national governments and the three-tiered structure of the SDGs was com-
other stakeholders to determine. Stated differently, pleted, having goals, targets, and indicators. The
by not deciding on legal frameworks and instead SDGs target all countries, and this is a major
leaving things for creative thought and collabora- change from the Millennium Development Goals
tion, these goals leave room for innovation. (MDGs), which mainly targeted developing
In that context, in July 2017, global indicators countries. Other features include the fact that
to measure progress with the SDGs were adop- they must integrate three aspects—environment,
ted. Their role is to quantitatively measure global society, economy; the fact that they are insepa-
progress with the SDGs using 232 indicators. rable; and the fact that each goal is linked to
Actually, more than 244 indicators are listed, but other goal categories.
since some of the indicators are used more than For the detailed implementation of these
once to measure different targets, the actual total goals, the 2030 Agenda calls upon each national
number is 232. Based on the initiatives of each government to establish domestic targets based
country, the 2030 Agenda calls on each country on the SDGs set at the global level and reflecting
to conduct regular and comprehensive reviews the domestic situation and priorities, and envi-
based on data for progress made with the SDGs, sions that progress will be measured by each
and the national review results then become the national government reflecting global targets in
platform for reviews at the regional and global concrete national strategy processes, policies,
levels. This progress with the indicators will be and strategies, and that governments and each
reported each year in a Sustainable Development stakeholder will set their own indicators reflect-
Goals Report by the UN Secretary-General. ing their own situation. Another important point
An important thing to note here is that pro- is that countries will not be using the same
gress with the SDGs cannot be measured without methods for implementation, so it is recognized
indicators. For follow-up on progress with the that each country will have its own respective
SDGs, there is also the Global Sustainable approaches, visions, and usable measures. In
Development Report (GSDG), with the first one addition, the 2030 Agenda emphasizes that the
scheduled to be submitted in 2019. This means SDGs cannot be achieved without partnerships
that, going forward, progress with the SDGs will among government, civil society, private sector,
be measured in terms of both quantitative and and UN organizations, etc., and thus, it aims to
qualitative measurements. mobilize knowledge, expertise, technologies, and
2 Sustainable Development Goals and International Governance … 19
funding. The progress toward big multi- predecessors, but when it comes to scale and size
dimensional goals is something referred to by of topics, the SDGs are unlike anything we have
this author’s research group as “green pluralism” seen before.
(Kanie et al. 2013), and it is no exaggeration to The societal foundations to enable acceptance
say that the SDGs are tools to foster and realize of this kind of governance are in the process of
green pluralism. being established. The spread of the Internet and
In our research group, which studies Earth social media is creating frameworks that are
system governance, we refer to the new approach independent, decentralized, and collaborative,
to global governance arising from the SDGs as and creating new collaboration and person-to-
“goal-based governance,” clearly distinguished person connections. As seen in the Arab Spring,
from the traditional and mainstream approach of one feature of modern society is that we are at a
“rule-based governance” (Kanie and Biermann level where this kind of trend can transform
2017). The creation of an international regime political movements. If these new kinds of
that offers a diverse set of tools has been central dynamics can be applied skillfully, perhaps all of
to the international legal framework that has society can be nudged in a sustainable direction.
played a core role in promoting the existing Goal-based governance as embodied in the SDGs
mechanisms that promote international coopera- can become a driving force for this. Indeed, as
tion. Up to this point, the various mechanisms for the world starts on SDGs-related initiatives, now
international cooperation that have been created is precisely the time for measurement in this
include international trade rules such as GATT unique new framework; though measurement did
and WTO-related, the UN Framework Conven- not receive so much focus previously, it will
tion on Climate Change, and the Kyoto Protocol become increasingly important going forward as
based on it, as well as the Convention on Bio- progress is made with the SDGs. Indeed, because
logical Diversity and the related Nagoya Proto- the SDGs cover not only on the economic
col, etc. In recent years, however, the dimension but are also comprehensive in that
international regime to address global environ- they include goals on the environmental and
mental problems is now reaching its limits: social dimensions, there is ever greater impor-
reaching consensus take much time to establish tance on the individual interlinkages, mutual
rules such as texts on procedures, and it is not connections, synergies, and tradeoffs. That point
possible to bring together the bold actions now is something that should be reflected in the ideal
required to respond to the constraints of the Earth designs for the measurement of progress.
system.
In this context, the aim of the SDGs is to
realize sustainable development using a different 2.3 SDG Indicators as Mechanisms
approach. As stated above, the SDGs are struc- for Measurement
tured as goals, targets, and indicators, and then and Comparison
monitoring and evaluation. In short, it is a simple
mechanism. For implementation, there are 17 Monitoring, measurement, and assessment play
goals but detailed implementation measures are important roles in SDGs governance. This is
not listed, so they are left up to each country and because measurement and comparison are the
stakeholder. only implementation mechanisms for governance
If the international regime could be described through goals. Even more important, measure-
as a bottom-up approach based on “fore-casting,” ment will play a critical role because measure-
with a build-up of legal frameworks, the SDGs ment is ultimately the source of a variety of
are the complete opposite. They start with the information to serve as a base for
desired outcome and then use “back-casting.” decision-making, to understand past problems, to
This kind of approach had not been seen deal with current problems, to understand the
before in global governance. The MDGs are actual state of the Earth, and to prepare for the
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
CHAPTER XVIII.
ACANTHOPTERYGII—
Percidæ (part. incl. Pristipomatidæ) 625 „
Mullidæ 35 „
Sparidæ 130 „
Squamipinnes 130 „
Cirrhitidæ 40 „
Heterolepidina 12 „
Scorpænidæ 120 „
Cottiæ (part.) 100 „
Cataphracti (part.) 20 „
Trachinidæ 100 „
Sciænidæ 100 „
Sphyrænidæ 15 „
Trichiuridæ 17 „
Elacate 1 „
Nomeidæ (part.) 5 „
Cyttidæ 8 „
Stromateus 9 „
Mene 1 „
Carangidæ (part.) 130 „
Kurtidæ 7 „
Gobiodon 7 „
Callionymina 30 „
Discoboli 11 „
Batrachidæ 14 „
Pediculati (part.) 11 „
Blenniidæ 90 „
Acanthoclinidæ 1 „
Teuthididæ 30 „
Acronuridæ 60 „
Hoplognathidæ 3 „
Malacanthidæ 3 „
Plesiopina 4 „
Trichonotidæ 2 „
Cepolidæ 7 „
Gobiesocidæ 21 „
Psychrolutidæ 2 „
Centriscidæ 7 „
Fistulariidæ 4 „
Acanthopterygii Pharyngognathi—
Pomacentridæ 150 „
Labridæ 400 „
Embiotocidæ 17 „
Anacanthini—
Gadopsidæ 1 „
Lycodidæ 15 „
Gadidæ (part.) 50 „
Ophidiidæ (part.) 40 „
Pleuronectidæ 160 „
Physostomi—
Saurina (part.) 16 „
Salmonidæ (part.) 7 „
Clupeidæ (part.) 130 „
Chirocentridæ 1 „
Chilobranchus 1 „
Murænidæ (part.) 200 „
Pegasidæ 4 „
120 „
Lophobranchii
Plectognathi—
Sclerodermi 95 „
Gymnodontes 83 „
CYCLOSTOMATA—
Myxinidæ 5 „
2 „
LEPTOCARDII
3587 species.
These types of Shore fishes are divided among the following
oceanic areæ:—
I. The Arctic Ocean.