PDF Sustainable Agrochemistry A Compendium of Technologies Silvio Vaz JR Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Sustainable Agrochemistry A Compendium of Technologies Silvio Vaz JR Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Sustainable Agrochemistry A Compendium of Technologies Silvio Vaz JR Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-development-in-
southern-europe-spatial-analysis-of-regional-challenges-eric-vaz/
https://textbookfull.com/product/geotechnics-for-natural-and-
engineered-sustainable-technologies-a-murali-krishna/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-compendium-of-
neuropsychological-tests-fundamentals-of-neuropsychological-
assessment-and-test-reviews-for-clinical-practice-4th-edition-
elisabeth-m-s-sherman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/innovative-technologies-for-the-
treatment-of-industrial-wastewater-a-sustainable-approach-1st-
edition-shirish-h-sonawane/
Juniper MX Series A Comprehensive Guide to Trio
Technologies on the MX 2nd Edition Douglas Richard
Hanks Jr.
https://textbookfull.com/product/juniper-mx-series-a-
comprehensive-guide-to-trio-technologies-on-the-mx-2nd-edition-
douglas-richard-hanks-jr/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lymphedema-a-concise-compendium-
of-theory-and-practice-2nd-edition-byung-boong-lee/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-water-treatment-
innovative-technologies-1st-edition-noor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-energy-
technologies-1st-edition-eduardo-rincon-mejia/
https://textbookfull.com/product/designing-sustainable-
technologies-products-and-policies-enrico-benetto/
Sílvio Vaz Jr. Editor
Sustainable
Agrochemistry
A Compendium of Technologies
Sustainable Agrochemistry
Sílvio Vaz Jr.
Editor
Sustainable Agrochemistry
A Compendium of Technologies
123
Editor
Sílvio Vaz Jr.
National Research Center for Agroenergy
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation
Brasilia, Brazil
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
I would like to dedicate this book to my wife
Ana and to my daughter Elena. They are my
source of inspiration.
Preface
Agrochemistry was seen during many years as a source of environmental and health
concerns due to, mainly, the pesticides used in agriculture around the world.
Conventional pesticides produced negative impacts on the environment as the biota
pollution and destruction near to the crop systems; furthermore, agricultural
workers were contaminated by these agrochemicals, causing serious illness and
death.
Nowadays, the demand from the modern society for sustainable production of
food has promoted the development of a sustainable agrochemistry considering
aspects such as reducing negative impacts on the environment- and health-friendly
materials and molecules, bioactive compounds, etc.
Agriculture remains one of the most strategic sectors for the global economy and
well-being. In this way, innovations and new paradigms are necessary for their
sustainable exploitation, and agrochemistry can certainly continue to contribute to
the generation of agricultural wealth for modern society.
This book intends to present a large variety of technologies for a sustainable
agrochemistry, such as semiochemicals for pest management, nanomaterials, green
chemistry principles for agriculture, among others, with their respective case study.
Chapter 1 defines sustainable agrochemistry, the main classes of agrochemicals
as well as their usages and dynamic in the agriculture and the environment.
Furthermore, some relevant aspects of sustainability in agriculture are presented and
discussed. Chapter 2 presents historical aspects of crop protection and the use of
pesticides to guarantee sustainable food supplies. Chapter 3 presents the principles
of semiochemical use for monitoring and controlling pests and the way in which
these natural molecules work is presented and discussed. Chapter 4 describes the
major concepts related to nanoscience and nanotechnology, role of green nan-
otechnology as an essential part of a sustainable future of agriculture, and its
applicability for the development of innovative solutions to challenging issues.
Chapter 5 deals with the use of magnetic resonance techniques to improve agri-
cultural systems, highlighting the obtaining of structural information about indus-
trial biomass and soil organic matter for scientific and technological usages.
Chapter 6 talks about chemical analyses and their important role in agriculture, as
vii
viii Preface
Acknowledgements The editor would like to thank all the authors for the efforts to prepare a
high-quality text—this is not a simple task. Thanks also to Springer team for enabling the trans-
formation of an idea into a book. Finally, thanks to colleagues from Embrapa Agroenergy for
refining and improving some parts of the manuscript.
ix
x Contents
xi
xii Contributors
Abstract This chapter defines sustainable agrochemistry, the main classes of agro-
chemicals as well as their usages and dynamics in the agriculture and the environment.
Furthermore, some relevant aspects of sustainability in agriculture are presented and
discussed.
1.1 Introduction
Fig. 1.1 Corn cropping in the Midwest region of Brazil, one of the largest producing regions of
cereal in the world. Courtesy of Climatempo, São Paulo
Chemistry is a science closely related to agriculture since its origin. The term agri-
cultural chemistry rises with the publication of Elements of Agricultural Chemistry
by the chemist Humphry Davy (Fig. 1.2) in 1813 in England (Encyclopaedia Bri-
tannica 2018). The book was traduced to French, Italian and German. It was also
published with great prestige in U.S. because it boosted the American agricultural
community, which was based on efficient techniques that had taken into account
scientific principles and observations.
Nowadays, we can define agrochemistry as the application of chemistry in agricul-
ture. Its action, object of study and technical means are not only concerned with the
production of agrochemicals but also with the analysis and prevention of the harmful
effects of chemical substances on both crops and humans (farmers and consumers),
and their impacts on the environment.
The contribution of chemistry goes back to the nineteenth century, with the syn-
thesis of inorganic fertilizers and, by the middle of the last century, of a great number
of compounds synthesized to control insects, diseases and weeds (Pinto-Zaervallos
and Zarbin 2013).
This contribution can be seen clearly and decisively in the cycle of nitrogen,
an essential element to some molecules that integrate the organic matter. Plants,
with some exceptions, do not have the capacity to absorb this element from the
atmosphere (with 78% nitrogen), the opposite of what occurs with another essential
element, carbon, which is absorbed as CO2 by means the photosynthesis. So, the
only natural way to close the nitrogen cycle is through the decomposition of organic
material from dead animal or plant, or the excretion of living things, and this form
of replenishment is naturally limited.
The capture and use of atmospheric nitrogen in the soil was only possible eco-
nomically via the works of the German chemists Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch. They
developed the Haber–Bosch reaction or process at the beginning of the twentieth
century (Ritter 2008), which allows the ammonia synthesis from the small reac-
tive atmospheric nitrogen and other abundant element, hydrogen, in industrial scale.
Curiously, the incentive that led to this essential innovation was not initially the pro-
duction of fertilizers, but the production of nitrates for military purposes (explosives)
to be used in World War I.
Nanotechnology,
biotechnology,
agronomy
Analytical &
environmental Food security
chemistry and Agrochemistry and enviornment
technological
chemistry
Sustainability
Fig. 1.3 Relation among agrochemistry and related areas of study and technological development
6 S. Vaz Jr.
Agrochemicals move a huge global market, and it is expected that these markets
achieve 250.5 billion USD by 2020 (Statista 2018). However, they are one of the
main classes of chemical pollutants, with serious negative impacts on public health
and environment. The search for alternatives to conventional agrochemicals presents
Fig. 1.4 Fertilizer consumption in nutrients per ha of arable land, according to Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (2015)
8
Fig. 1.5 Pesticides per ha of arable land (kg ha−1 ), according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015)
S. Vaz Jr.
1 Introduction to Sustainable Agrochemistry 9
Governments, farmers and consumers show increasing concerns with the negative
impacts on the environment and health caused by the large amount of inputs applied
to produce different crops worldwide. Agrochemicals have a direct correlation with
damages from agriculture, with pesticides being the main representative class with
toxicological implications.
The main negatives from the agriculture impacts on the environment are:
• Water and air pollution due to the use of pesticides;
• Extinction of water bodies, due to high water demand;
• Erosion and soil degradation due to inadequate management during cultivation;
• Change in biota due to factors already listed;
• Changes in the quality of environmental resources, also due to factors already
listed;
• Ecological risks for insects, plants and animals associated with the change of
environment;
• Climate change due to the deforestation and biomass combustion.
Regarding those impacts on health, it can be highlighted:
• Poisoning due to pesticide use and food contaminated consumption;
• Occupational risks to farmers due to the exposition to pesticides;
• Human infections, or emerging infectious diseases, that do not respond to treatment
due to the use of antimicrobials in agriculture (Grace 2018).
From these negative impacts, it is becoming paramount the development of a more
environmentally and healthy friendly agriculture.
10 S. Vaz Jr.
Agricultural chemistry is, undoubtedly, one of the fields of research and business
whose impact is felt throughout the world, since we all need to eat to survive. Added
to this is the fact that, increasingly, technology is intertwining with modern agri-
culture, both with regard to new production strategies and the reduction of negative
environmental impacts (Herman 2015).
Sustainability can be seen and understood by means of its three components:
• Environmental impacts;
• Economic impacts;
• Societal impacts.
Impacts can be positive or negative according their direct or indirect effects upon
the environment, economy and society. Considering that agrochemistry is the appli-
cation of chemistry and its concepts and technologies to promote a better agriculture,
economic and societal impacts are expected to be positive, specially the economic
impacts. On the other hand, and due to a historic of environmental incidents at global
level (e.g., water pollution), environmental impacts are expected to be negative; nev-
ertheless, it could be positive if modern technologies and good agricultural practices
are used. A more detailed evaluation of sustainability in agriculture can be seen in
Quintero-Angel and González-Acevedo (2018).
Sustainable chemistry, a recent branch of chemistry, was defined as “(…) a sci-
entific concept that seeks to improve the efficiency with which natural resources are
used to meet human needs for chemical products and services. Sustainable chemistry
encompasses the design, manufacture and use of efficient, effective, safe and more
environmentally benign chemical products and processes.” (Organization of Eco-
nomic Co-operation and Development 2018). From these statements, a relationship
with agrochemistry can be constructed by means of design, manufacture and use of
efficient, effective, safe and more environmentally benign agrochemicals, that is, by
the establishment of a strong innovation drive in agriculture for the next decades as
we can read in this book.
References
Herman C (2015) Agricultural chemistry: new strategies and environmental perspectives to feed a
growing global population. American Chemical Society, Washington
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (2006) Glossary of terms related to pesticides.
In: Stephenson GR, Ferris IG, Holland PT, Norberg M (eds) Pure and applied chemistry, vol 78,
pp 2075–2154
Liu J, Ma K, Ciais P, Polasky S (2016) Reducing human nitrogen use for food production. Scientific
reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30104
Nobel Prize (2018) Norman Borlaug—biographical. https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/
peace/laureates/1970/borlaug-bio.html. Accessed Aug 2018
Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (2018) Sustainable chemistry. http://
www.oecd.org/env/ehs/risk-management/sustainablechemistry.htm. Accessed Aug 2018
Pingali D (2012) Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
109:12302–12308
Pinto-Zaervallos DM, Zarbin PHG (2013) Química na agricultura: perspectivas para o desenvolvi-
mento de tecnologias sustentáveis [Chemistry in agriculture: perspectives for the development of
sustainable technologies]. Quim Nova 36:1509–1513
Quintero-Angel M, González-Acevedo A (2018) Tendencies and challenges for the assessment of
agricultural sustainability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 254:273–281
Ritter SK (2008) The Harber-Bosh reaction: an early chemical impact on sustainability. Chemical &
Engineering News. https://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/86/8633cover3box2.html. Accessed Aug
2018
Statista (2018) Worldwide agrochemical market value in 2014 and 2020 (in billion
U.S. dollars). https://www.statista.com/statistics/311957/global-agrochemical-market-revenue-
projection/. Accessed in Aug 2018
U.S. Geological Survey (2017) USGS Minerals information: nitrogen. https://minerals.usgs.gov/
minerals/pubs/commodity/nitrogen/. Accessed Aug 2018
Chapter 2
The Battle for a Sustainable Food Supply
Abstract Since the time that Homo sapiens took up farming, a battle has been
waged against pests and diseases which can cause significant losses in crop yield
and threaten a sustainable food supply. Initially, early control techniques included
religious practices or folk magic, hand removal of weeds and insects, and “chemical”
techniques such as smokes, easily available minerals, oils and plant extracts known
to have pesticidal activity. But it was not until the early twentieth century that real
progress was made when a large number of compounds became available for testing
as pesticides due to the upsurge in organic chemistry. The period after the 1940s
saw the introduction of important families of chemicals, such as the phenoxy acid
herbicides, the organochlorine insecticides and the dithiocarbamate fungicides. The
introduction of new pesticides led to significant yield increases, but concern arose
over their possible negative effects on human health and the environment. In time,
resistance started to occur, making these pesticides less effective. This led agrochem-
ical companies putting in place research looking for new modes of action and giving
less toxic and more environmentally friendly products. These research programmes
gave rise to new pesticide families, such as the sulfonylurea herbicides, the strobilurin
fungicides and the neonicotinoid insecticide classes.
This work formed part of a project (Project No. 2012-019-1-600) supported by the International
Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).
J. Unsworth (B)
Consultant, Vellacotts,
Chelmsford CM1 7EA, UK
e-mail: [email protected]
Y. Nakagawa
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
C. Harris
Exponent International Limited, The Lenz, Hornbeam Business Park, Harrogate,
North Yorkshire HG2 8RE, UK
G. Kleter
Wageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research,
Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands
2.1 Introduction
Homo sapiens, or Latin for wise man, was a term first applied in 1758 by Linnaeus for
modern humans. They are thought to have first appeared roughly 200,000 years ago
in what is now Ethiopia (McDougall et al. 2005), although there is some evidence that
they emerged substantially earlier than this (Hublin et al. 2017). Until the practice of
agriculture some 190,000 years later, the only way to obtain a sufficient food supply
was by foraging, i.e., hunting wild animals and gathering edible plants and seeds.
Hunter-gatherer societies were generally nomadic, moving several times each year
to new areas when the returns of forays from their current camp dropped below those
to be expected from another camp (Kelly 1992). The transition from hunter-gatherer
to agriculture can be considered as having occurred in four steps (Olsson 2001):
(i) Wild plant–food procurement—hunter-gatherers in this stage occasionally burn
the vegetation, gather and protect useful plants and fruit.
(ii) Wild plant–food production with some tillage—maintenance of plant popula-
tions in the wild is carried out, and both planting and sowing of wild plants
are undertaken, as well as weeding. Seeds from selected plants with desirable
characteristics are propagated in new habitats. When harvesting is completed,
some of the seed is stored for future use.
(iii) Cultivation with systematic tillage—land is cleared and the food-producing
activities that were introduced in the previous stage (sowing, weeding, propa-
gation of plants, etc.) are intensified.
(iv) Plant domestication—as the selective cultivation of plants proceeds, new geno-
types eventually appear that more efficiently serve human needs.
Several theories have been put forward to explain why the change from hunter-
gatherers to farmers took place (Price and Bar-Yosef 2011; Weisdorf 2005), including
changes in climate (Richerson et al. 2001; Dow et al. 2005; Bettinger et al. 2009),
population density and technological sophistication (Baker 2008), over-hunting of
large animals leading to their extinction (Smith 1975) and social evolution (Bender
1978). It has also been postulated that as societies began to use ever more varied
equipment for foraging with containers, stone mortars, baskets, fishnets and traps,
drying racks, etc., plus starting to store food in pits and embarking on agriculture, the
necessary equipment became increasingly burdensome. Moving regularly from one
area to another became more difficult and mobility was thus reduced, with people
tending to stay in one area. This increasing and practically enforced sedentarism of
hunter-gatherers increased their involvement in agriculture (de Saulieu and Testart
2015). Whatever the reason, or combination of reasons, agriculture, as in the cultiva-
tion of plants for food, was adopted between 5000 and 12,000 years ago. Independent
points of origin included the Near East, north and south China, sub-Saharan Africa,
2 The Battle for a Sustainable Food Supply 15
Central Mexico, South-Central Andes and the eastern USA, with subsequent diffu-
sion to most parts of the globe (Richerson et al. 2001). Once adopted, agriculturally
based communities increased significantly in size (Gignouxa et al. 2011) with the
corresponding requirement to increase the food supply.
The practice of agriculture first began in the Fertile Crescent of Mesopotamia
(part of present-day Iraq, Turkey, Syria and Jordan) where edible seeds were initially
gathered, as in stage (i) above, by a population of hunter-gatherers (Kislev et al.
2004). Interestingly, the change from hunting and gathering to farming as a subsis-
tence method does not seem to be a logical choice since, with a limited population
and plentiful resources, hunting and gathering are less demanding work than farm-
ing. Agriculture requires cooperation, whilst living in settlements has social impacts
such as diseases, social inequality and division of labour (Hirst 2017). The wide-
scale transition of many human cultures from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering
to one of agriculture and settlement, allowing the ability to support an increasingly
large population, has been called the Neolithic Revolution or Neolithic Demographic
Transition (Bellwood and Oxenham 2008). The adoption of agriculture in the Stone
Age is one of the major curiosities in human cultural history since studies carried out
among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder
to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors (Weisdorf 2009). Although the
population explosion that followed the Neolithic Revolution was initially explained
by improved health for agriculturalists, empirical studies of societies shifting subsis-
tence from foraging to primary food production have found evidence for deteriorat-
ing health from an increase in infectious and dental disease and a rise in nutritional
deficiencies (Latham 2013). Hence, early farmers appear to have been smaller and
less healthy than hunter-gatherers (Cohen and Crane-Kramer 2007; Armelagos et al.
1991). This counterintuitive increase in nutritional diseases resulted from factors
such as seasonal hunger, reliance on single crops deficient in essential nutrients, crop
blights and social inequalities. The impact of agriculture, accompanied by increas-
ing population density and a rise in infectious disease, was observed to decrease
stature in populations across the entire globe, regardless of the temporal period dur-
ing which agriculture was adopted, including Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia,
South America and North America (Mummert et al. 2011).
As the population became more settled, and farming became the way of life, it
has been suggested that eight plants, the so-called eight founder crops formed the
basis of the origins of agriculture, with all eight coming from the Fertile Crescent
region. The eight crops include three cereals (einkorn wheat, emmer wheat and
barley), four legumes (lentil, pea, chickpea and bitter vetch) and one oil and fibre
crop—flax or linseed (Hirst 2018; Weiss and Zohary 2011). Somewhat later, rice
and millet were domesticated in China (Deng et al. 2015), whilst about 7500 years
ago rice and sorghum were being farmed in the Sahel region of Africa. Local crops
were domesticated independently in West Africa and possibly in New Guinea and
Ethiopia, whilst several crop plants were domesticated in the Americas including
corn, squashes, potato and sunflowers (Petruzzello 2019). It is clear that farmed
crops could suffer from pests and diseases causing a large loss in yield, with the
16 J. Unsworth et al.
ever-present possibility of famine for the population. There was thus a great incentive
to find ways of overcoming the problems caused by pests and diseases.
There are a large number of pests and diseases that can affect crops, thereby
reducing crop yield with the concomitant possibility of hunger and in extreme cases
famine for the population. It has been estimated that there are over 70,000 different
pest species that can damage agricultural crops, including 9000 species of insects and
mites, 50,000 species of plant pathogens and 8000 species of weeds. Although, in
general, less than 10% of these organisms are considered to be major pests, this still
leaves a considerable number that can have a significant effect on crop productivity
(Pimental 2009). In addition, farmers also have to contend with damage caused by
nematodes, slugs, snails, birds and mammals. Damage to crops can occur in different
ways, and pests and diseases can be classified according to the types of damage that
they cause (Boote et al. 1983). These classifications are:
• Stand reducers—e.g. damping-off fungi;
• Photosynthetic rate reducers—e.g. fungi, bacteria, viruses;
• Leaf senescence—e.g. various pathogens;
• Light stealers—e.g. weeds, some leaf pathogens;
• Assimilate sappers—e.g. nematodes, pathogens, sucking arthropods;
• Tissue consumers—e.g. chewing animals, necrotrophic pathogens;
• Turgor reducers—e.g. nematodes, root-feeding insects, root rot pathogens.
Initially, pest control was probably a manual occupation, e.g. weeding or removal
of caterpillars and insects by hand, followed by attempts to protect crops by means of
religion, folk magic and the use of what may be termed early chemical methods. For
example, pyrethrum is recorded as being used in China 2000 years ago (McLaughlin
Gormley King Company 2010) and is still used today (Market Research.com 2015).
Up until the mid-nineteenth century, various plant, animal or mineral derivatives
(Smith and Secoy 1975, 1976a) were used for pest control; these were later augmented
by compounds from the dyestuff industry, e.g. Paris Green, and by-products from
the burgeoning chemical industry based on coal tar with phenol-based chemicals
(Gray 1916). The growth in synthetic pesticides accelerated in the 1940s with the
discovery of the pesticidal effects of numerous organic chemicals, which led to the
development of, for example, chlorinated hydrocarbons such as DDT as insecticides
and phenoxy acid derivatives like 2,4-D as herbicides. As the use of these “new”
pesticides increased, concerns for their effect on human health and the environment
were raised and attention was given to the development of low-rate, lower-risk organic
compounds as pesticides. It can be argued that there have been five significant phases
in the evolution of pesticides. With some inevitable overlap of the individual phases,
they can be summarised as:
• Before 1000—early pest management;
• 1000–1850—plant, animal or mineral derivatives;
• 1850–1940—inorganic products, industrial by-products;
• 1940–1970—synthetic organic compounds;
• 1970–present—lower-risk synthetic organic compounds.
2 The Battle for a Sustainable Food Supply 17
Given the significant number of pests and diseases that can impact on crop yields,
and the variety of ways by which this can happen, it is not surprising that since the
dawn of agriculture, farmers have been engaged in a constant battle against them.
This battle continues today, and it has been estimated that potential crop losses
worldwide would be between 50 and 82%, depending on the crop, in the absence
of pest control (Oerke 2006), and the economic loss has been estimated at US $250
billion (Agropages 2015).
As an example of the deleterious effects of weeds on crop yield, it has been
estimated that at a density of only two weeds per foot of row corn yield was reduced
10% by giant foxtail, 11% by common lambsquarters, 18% by velvetleaf and 22%
by common cocklebur (Moechnig et al. 2013). Given the fact that approximately 1
in 9 of the global population is suffering from undernourishment (FAO 2018) and
that the global population is estimated to rise from 7.3 billion today to 9 billion in
2050, it is essential that food shortages caused by reductions in crop yields due to
pests and diseases are kept to an absolute minimum. Chemistry will continue to have
a significant role in the control of fungal pathogens, insect pests and weeds which,
together with modified farming practices, new crop varieties, increased irrigation and
optimum fertiliser use, will play a key role in achieving increased and sustainable
productivity.
Ancient farmers would have tried every method available to them at the time to
maintain or increase crop yields. For example, in the Mediterranean region repeated
fertilisation of the soil, careful tillage, intelligent selection of crops suited to climate
and soil, importation of foreign seed and plants, painstaking seed selection, with
crop protection techniques as part of the mix were all used (Semple 1928). However,
despite this, the yield per hectare remained relatively low. In Mesopotamia, irrigated
cereal crops have been reported as giving a yield of almost 2 tonnes per hectare,
although this declined to only about one-third as much by 1700 BC, probably due to
increasing salinity of the irrigated areas (Evans 1980). A maximum return known in
Roman Italy about 50 BC gave a yield of eight to tenfold of planted seed. This was
the yield of winter wheat from rich volcanic soils in eastern Sicily, and it amounted to
20 or 24 bushels to the acre, or approximately 1.4–1.7 tonnes per hectare. A yield of
15-fold or 36 bushels of wheat to the acre (approximately 2.5 tonnes per hectare) was
quite extraordinary and restricted to a few favoured spots (Semple 1928), although
wheat yields of up to 3.6 tonnes per hectare were probably obtained in Galilee around
the beginning of the first century AD (Evans 1980). These figures can be compared
with about 5 tonnes/hectare achieved in Greece and Italy and 7 tonnes per hectare
in Egypt today (World Bank 2018). Nevertheless, whilst reasonable yields could be
obtained under some favourable conditions, the possibility of disease significantly
reducing crop yield was always present. Cereal stem rust was particularly feared and
could lead to 100% crop loss. In the Bible, there are several references to epidemics
18 J. Unsworth et al.
of rusts and smuts inflicted on the Israelites as a punishment for their sins (Leonard
and Szabo 2005).
In many agricultural societies, there was a widespread belief that pests were evil and
were sent as a punishment from the gods; as a result, many early pest management
strategies were based on religious practices. Thus, the Sumerian goddess Ninkilim
was invoked to protect growing barley from damage by rodents, and a Babylonian
tablet contains an incantation asking the sun and moon gods to prevent ergot from
developing on ears of grain (Secoy and Smith 1977). In Egypt, reliefs in tombs dating
as early as the Old Kingdom, about 2649–2150 BC, show that illiterate shepherds
and farmers could recite spells to protect herds and crops (Zucconi 2007). In ancient
Rome, the deity Robigus and the goddess Flora were believed to be responsible
for rust and mildew, but when they were appeased, these diseases would not harm
the grain and trees. In honour of Robigus, the solemn feast of the Robigalia was
thus established, during which a rust coloured dog was sacrificed, while for Flora,
there were games called Floralia (Smith and Secoy 1975). The Greek god Apollo
was believed to give protection to crops against summer heat, blight, mildew and
other pests such as field mice and grasshoppers (Secoy and Smith 1977). In India the
Atharvaveda, a sacred Hindu text, described the chanting of mantras to protect crops
from insects such as grasshoppers; one such mantra from around 400 BC evokes the
Hindu deity Rama to protect grain. The mantra had to be written with the red lac-dye
on a leaf and tied in the field (Goyal 2003). Similarly, in Sri Lanka, mantras have been
used in agriculture to obtain higher yields and also to protect crops from damage by
pests and wild animals (Upawansa and Wagachchi 2018). In Japan, farmers would
entreat deities through ceremonies such as mushi-oi or mushi-okuri, meaning driving
away noxious insects. For this, the local population walked around rice paddies in
procession shouting, with bells and torches to drive away rice pests and pray for
that year’s farming. In addition, farmers would place beef or phallic-shaped ritual
equipment in the water inlets to fields to ward off insect pests (Ohta 2013). Besides
the invocation of deities to keep pests from crops, there were a host of folk remedies
that could also be practiced. Thus, in Roman times, it was thought that trees could
be protected against caterpillars by touching the tops with the gall of a green lizard
and that a crayfish hung up in the middle of a garden would afford protection against
caterpillars. Mildew would be controlled by placing branches of laurel in the ground,
near to growing wheat, thus causing the mildew to pass from the fields to the foliage
of the laurels. Diseases of millet could be prevented by carrying a toad around the
field at night before burying the creature in the middle of the field in a pot (Smith and
Secoy 1975). According to Columella (4–70 AD), the Etruscans set the flayed head
of an ass at the edge of a field to protect grain from rust (Secoy and Smith 1977). It
was also hoped that amulets, sometimes in the form of a protective deity, and others
shaped like the pest itself, would ward off a danger, e.g. locust amulets which have
2 The Battle for a Sustainable Food Supply 19
been discovered in ancient Egyptian tombs (Kenawy and Abdel-Hamid 2015). Many
other religious and folk remedies have been described, and more information can be
found in the above references.
Whilst religious and folk remedies were of dubious value other management prac-
tices involving, for example, removal of weeds by hand, hoeing or ploughing and
the picking of insects from crops would have been successful, if time-consuming.
Chasing or throwing stones at birds and small mammals would have been effective,
and, although probably less effective, scarecrows were also used to deter these pests.
The first scarecrows are reported in Ancient Egypt, dating back over 3000 years,
where they were used to protect wheat fields along the river Nile from quail. The
Greeks, Romans, Japanese and many other cultures also used scarecrows to protect
their crops.
The practice of burning cereal stubble after harvest would also have contributed
to the destruction of weed seeds. In addition, physical methods such as the use of
tar on tree trunks to trap crawling insects and the adding of fine sand to stored grain
would prevent much of the damage caused by insects. In stored grain, the addition of
fine sand inhibits movement of the insects and reduces the oxygen content, thereby
making it hard for the insects to get enough oxygen to survive; in addition, the sand
is abrasive and would scratch the hard covering that surrounds the bodies of beetles,
leading to desiccation and death (De Groot 2004). This method is still used today,
particularly in Africa, and was used in ancient Egypt. It can be assumed that it was
sufficiently effective to exterminate a pest such as the lesser grain borer, recently
arrived in the region (Pharaonic Egypt 2000). Similarly in 750 BC, Homer noted the
use of wood ash spread on land as a form of pest control where it acts as a physical
poison, usually causing abrasion of epicuticular waxes and thus exposing pests to
death through desiccation. It also interferes with the chemical signals emanating from
the host plants, thus obstructing the initial host location from pests. When foliage is
treated with wood ash, it also becomes unpalatable for foliage feeders like cutworms,
caterpillars and grasshoppers (Verma 1998).
Biological methods were also used; for example, mention is made in a docu-
ment reputed to have been written in 304 AD of the use in ancient China of citrus
ants against insects found on citrus trees (Huang and Yang 1987). Similarly, around
1000 AD in Arabia, ants were moved from nearby mountains to oases to control
phytophagous ants which attack date palms.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Fig. 124—Cis melliei. Martinique. A, Perfect Insect; B, pupa; C, larva;
D, terminal portion of body of larva. (After Coquerel.)
Several larvae are well known; indeed the "wire-worms" that are
sometimes so abundant in cultivated places are larvae of Elateridae.
In this instar the form is usually elongate and nearly cylindrical; the
thoracic segments differ but little from the others except that they
bear rather short legs; the skin is rather hard, and usually bears
punctuation or sculpture; the body frequently terminates in a very
hard process, of irregular shape and bearing peculiar sculpture on its
upper surface, while beneath it the prominent anal orifice is placed:
this is sometimes furnished with hooks, the function of which has not
yet been observed. The majority of these larvae live in decaying
wood, but some are found in the earth; as a rule the growth is
extremely slow, and the life of the larva may extend over two or more
years. Some obscurity has prevailed as to their food; it is now
considered to be chiefly flesh, though some species probably attack
decaying roots; and it is understood that wire-worms destroy the
living roots, or underground stems, of the crops they damage.
Various kinds of Myriapods (see Vol. V. p. 29) are often called "wire-
worm," but they may be recognised by possessing more than six
legs. The larvae of the genus Cardiophorus are very different, being
remarkably elongate without the peculiar terminal structure, but
apparently composed of twenty-three segments.
Tarsi of the front and middle legs with five, those of the hind legs with
four, joints.