Textbook Urban Environment Travel Behavior Health and Resident Satisfaction Anzhelika Antipova Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Urban Environment Travel Behavior Health and Resident Satisfaction Anzhelika Antipova Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Urban Environment Travel Behavior Health and Resident Satisfaction Anzhelika Antipova Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/health-psychology-an-
introduction-to-behavior-and-health-linda-brannon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/media-art-and-the-urban-
environment-engendering-public-engagement-with-urban-ecology-1st-
edition-francis-t-marchese-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/coping-with-caring-a-nurses-
guide-to-better-health-and-job-satisfaction-1st-edition-meredith-
mealer-author/
Information Technology Science 1st Edition Tatiana
Antipova
https://textbookfull.com/product/information-technology-
science-1st-edition-tatiana-antipova/
https://textbookfull.com/product/describing-the-behavior-and-
effects-of-pesticides-in-urban-and-agricultural-settings-1st-
edition-jackson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/geospatial-technologies-for-
urban-health-yongmei-lu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nanobiotechnology-human-health-
and-the-environment-first-edition-dhawan-alok/
https://textbookfull.com/product/integrated-science-in-digital-
age-icis-2019-tatiana-antipova/
Urban Environment,
Travel Behavior, Health,
and Resident Satisfaction
Anzhelika Antipova
Urban Environment, Travel Behavior, Health,
and Resident Satisfaction
Anzhelika Antipova
Urban Environment,
Travel Behavior,
Health, and Resident
Satisfaction
Anzhelika Antipova
The University of Memphis
Memphis, TN, USA
This book could not have been written without the support of numerous
people. At the University of Memphis, Daniel Larsen, Jerry Bartholomew,
and David Dye, who friendly encouraged me to apply for a sabbatical leave
and provided moral and professional support. I am indebted to College of
Arts and Sciences and Department of Earth Sciences at the University of
Memphis for your generosity. I would not be able to focus on writing
otherwise. Thank you for creating a stimulating atmosphere in which to
work productively.
I would like to thank DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch
Dienst e.V.) (German Academic Exchange Service) for granting me a
research scholarship. It gave me an amazing opportunity to design and
implement my research. This is where the idea was born. I want to express
my gratitude to the entire Geography Department at the University of
Duisburg-Essen (Essen, Germany) including a group of students who
assisted with questionnaire administration and all faculty including Prof.
Dr. Rudolf Juchelka, Friedrich Schulte-Derne, Ulrike Ohl, Ulrike
Overbeck, Svenja Böttcher, and others. Thank you for your help with
questionnaire design and translations into German, for hosting me, and
for your sincere support—I truly needed your friendship.
Thank you, my anonymous reviewers who greatly contributed to this
book.
I owe a great deal to my family. My mom’s love has helped me at every
stage of the project. I thank my husband, Yuri, for being there and keep-
ing me focused. Lastly, I thank my daughters Xenia and Julia for being my
friends and being very patient as I worked on the book.
vii
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Urban Growth 1
1.2 Urbanization and Problems 3
1.3 Urban Policy 5
1.3.1 Urban Policy of the Nineteenth Century 7
1.3.2 Urban Agenda 8
1.4 Urban Problems of the Twentieth and Early Twenty-First
Centuries 9
1.5 Negative Impacts of Urban Policy 9
1.6 Gautreaux Program 11
1.7 Federal Urban Policies and City Impact 12
1.8 The US National Housing Policy 13
1.8.1 Major Housing Programs and Impacts 13
1.8.1.1 Shortage of Affordable Housing 17
1.8.1.2 Housing Policy Change. Poverty
Deconcentration 17
1.8.2 Public Awareness of Housing Discrimination 18
1.8.3 Housing Discrimination 2001 Survey 18
1.8.3.1 Investigating Housing Discrimination 19
1.8.3.2 “Do We Know More Now?” Survey 20
1.8.3.3 Housing Discrimination Survey Findings 21
1.8.3.4 Housing Discrimination: Public
Awareness as a Public Policy Tool 21
1.8.4 Air Pollution Program and Brownfields 22
Bibliography 29
ix
x Contents
7 Conclusions 335
7.1 Introduction335
7.2 How Changing Demographics and Travel Behavior Are
Related339
7.3 What Are Housing/Working Perceptions and Motivations
of Transit Access?340
7.4 What Is the Role of Urban Built Environment in Pollution
Exposure?342
7.5 What Are the Trends in Urban Air Pollution and Its
Health Effects?344
7.5.1 What Are the Global Health Impacts of Air
Pollution?345
7.5.2 How Does School Travel Relate to Pollution
Exposure?348
7.5.3 Commuting Has Important Effects on Health,
and Work Experience349
7.6 What Are the Links Between Health and Active
Transportation?351
7.7 There Are Safety Aspects of Active Travel352
7.7.1 What Can Be Done to Prevent Obesity?353
Bibliography 355
Index 359
List of Figures
xvii
xviii List of Figures
Fig. 5.2 Bike storage facilities in Washington, DC. (Author 2010) 209
Fig. 5.3 In Washington DC, local-scale design features including
trees, aesthetically pleasing places, and well-maintained
sidewalks are favorable to pedestrians. (Author 2010) 210
Fig. 5.4 Street-level commercial uses (a bakery is on the right and
barber’s salon is on the left) and residencies above in Essen,
Germany. (Author 2010) 211
Fig. 5.5 One-family house in a conventional US suburb in Memphis.
(Author 2017) 214
Fig. 5.6 Traffic calming in residential areas: 30 km posted speed in
Essen, Germany. (Author 2010) 216
Fig. 5.7 Higher than in Germany posted speeds of 35 miles/hour
(>56 km/hour) in residential areas in USA. (Author 2017) 217
Fig. 5.8 A residential suburb by Essen, Germany. (Author 2010) 218
Fig. 5.9 Open air farmers market in pedestrian car-free zones in
Essen center, Germany. (Author 2010) 219
Fig. 5.10 German senior citizens at a light rail stop near a residential
neighborhood in Essen, Germany. (Author 2010) 221
Fig. 5.11 Off-street separated red-colored bike path in Rotterdam,
Netherlands. (Author 2010) 223
Fig. 5.12 Walking in Boston past a popular restaurant. (Author 2013) 225
Fig. 5.13 Many people are walking along the Esplanade in NYC.
(Author 2013) 228
Fig. 5.14 New York is among the US cities where cycling rates have
increased. (Author 2013) 230
Fig. 5.15 Light rail (“Ubahn”) on a street by residential buildings
in Essen, Germany. (Author 2010) 237
Fig. 5.16 Waiting for a commuter train to New York City.
(Author 2013) 238
Fig. 5.17 Public transportation in Boston. (Author 2013) 239
Fig. 5.18 Walking to a public transportation stop in Boston.
(Author 2013) 240
Fig. 5.19 Real-time light-rail schedule and train information in Essen,
Germany. (Author 2010) 242
Fig. 5.20 Active travel percentage of all trips (%) for USA (2001, 2009)
and Germany (2002, 2008) 243
Fig. 5.21 Compact development consisting of multistory residential
buildings stores with commercial uses occupying the first
floor and limited car parking in Essen, Germany.
(Author 2010) 244
Fig. 5.22 A residential area is closely located to light rail and bus stops
in Essen, Germany. (Author 2010) 248
xx List of Figures
xxi
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
As cities grew, their physical form changed. All American cities, large
and small, had a well-defined central core district. By the beginning of the
twentieth century, the core business districts of the cities concentrated
most commercial, financial, and retail uses including offices, banks, hotels,
theaters, restaurants, department and specialty stores, and the like. Other
functions of the downtown area included governmental and wholesale. All
these downtown functions drew employees, clients, and visitors, with the
city population relying upon the central core district for jobs, consumer
goods, and services. The central core district kept its centrality advantage
until the 1920s. Light industry and manufacturing was abundant near the
central district and was also located along the freight railroads or major
waterways or both. Industries included lumberyards, grain elevators, and
bulk storage facilities (Peterson 2003).
Residencies also developed, and became diversified by class. Immigrants
and common workers walked to the shops and factories and needed hous-
ing nearby. Crowded working-class neighborhoods consisting of cheap
rental barracks, tenements, and wood-frame houses are seen in the
photographs of the time blackened with coal smoke coming from adjacent
industrial sites. Better apartments of the emerging lower middle class lined
streetcar routes on both sides so that dwellers of these newer neighbor-
hoods could ride the streetcar to work. Best lands near the central core
and the edge of the city were occupied by single-family housing of upper-
income class. The expensive inland enclaves and suburbs were often
located along the streetcar lines or commuter railroads offering fast
transportation.
epidemics such as cholera and high mortality and morbidity. High rates of
infant mortality and low life expectancy impacted population in a devastat-
ing way. Levy (2013) blames congestion for the natural decrease experi-
enced for much of the nineteenth century by most large American cities:
there were more deaths than births, but in fact, many cities increased due
to in-migration. Cities of the nineteenth century had no water treatment
facilities or sewage disposal.
Although the early twentieth century saw abatement of the worst over-
crowding in urban slum neighborhoods compared with the nineteenth
century, a substantial amount of substandard dwellings were still found in
many large American cities. For example, St. Louis, where many structures
erected in the previous century had inadequate facilities (e.g., no indoor
toilets were installed but merely outhouses, plus only cold water or no
running water was provided) (Hoffman 2012). In the early twentieth cen-
tury, the coming of the automobile made roads dangerous to pedestrians
and exposed people to noise and gasoline fumes.
Implementation of urban housing programs (described later in the
chapter), especially the creation of the public housing program in 1937
and the enactment of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968,
resulted in renovation and repair of existing structures so that the share of
residential buildings in need of substantial physical repair greatly declined,
while living conditions greatly improved. To compare, in 1940, 45% of
American homes had inadequate facilities (that is, no running water, a
flush toilet, or a private bath); the percentage of homes lacking these
indoor facilities was just under 3% in 1980.
The level of crowding has declined steeply over the years 1940 to 2000.
According to the US Historical Census of Housing (2011), the overall
share of crowded households (occupied housing units are considered
crowded if there is more than one person per room) declined over time:
the percentage of crowding decreased from 20% in 1940 to 4.5% in 1980;
however, it rose to 5.7% in 2000. The level of severely crowded homes
(homes are considered severely crowded if there is more than 1.5 persons
per room) changed in a similar way: in 1940, 9% of all homes were severely
crowded, while only 1.4% of occupied housing units in 1980 were consid-
ered as such. This percentage rose again in 2000 to 2.7% (2.9 million were
considered severely crowded).
Geographically, in 1940, states with high crowding rates were largely con-
centrated in the South. New Mexico had a crowding rate more than twice
the national rate: 48% versus 20% national rate, followed by Alabama
INTRODUCTION 5
for the current travelers and those who may switch from car to public tran-
sit (direct effect), but also what changes in land-use patterns it may trigger,
such as changes in the level and location of employment and increased
apartment rents and land prices, both of which are indirect effects caused
by improved (real and perceived) accessibility of a place. Therefore, model-
ing is useful in the research context (analysis of complex relationships) and
in many urban policy-making contexts (analysis of urban policies) at the
different levels, from local to federal. For example, local governments issue
policies on zoning that permit specific economic activities in some urban
parts but not in the others, while transportation planning policies contrib-
ute to a provision of a transportation system that is safe and convenient
while impacting travel behavior of the existing commuters and addressing
the needs of lower income families, those without cars, and so on.
1.3.2 Urban Agenda
Since the early twentieth century, municipal governments became respon-
sible for managing growth and regulating the character of urban develop-
ment. The patterns of land uses in American cities have been changing. In
addition to shifts in residential neighborhoods, there were changes in the
pattern of commercial and industrial uses. With time, as the city’s popula-
tion increases, non-residential land uses in the central business district
(CBD) tend to start expanding. Financial and business uses press outward
and invade residential areas near the CBD and there occurs a subsequent
replacement of residential area as the expanding retail commercial uses
force people to move farther out. New technology (e.g., a steel-frame
skyscraper, elevator) enables the vertical growth and leads to the
intensification of land use within the CBD area with the height of the
buildings changing the skyline of the downtown area.
As the middle- and upper-income class residencies relocate toward the
periphery (simultaneously decreasing purchasing power of people who
reside near the CBD), the stores and shopping centers also move away from
the CBD in the direction of the high-class residential area. Retail commer-
cial uses relocate to where two or more main highways converge and form
outlying business centers, or along the principal highway. The outlying busi-
ness centers are comparable in terms of services and facilities (e.g., chain
stores) with those of the main business center and become increasingly
more important regarding the total volume of retail sales. For example, in
pre–Civil War Philadelphia, the downtown area was within easy reach for all
the city’s residents and most retail and banking was concentrated within the
central business core. In the 1930s, as the city grew in area and population,
outlying shopping centers developed outside the central district. Similarly,
in Chicago during 1900–1915 businesses were concentrated in the Loop
INTRODUCTION 9