Visualizing The Out-Of-plane Electronic Dispersions in An Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide
Visualizing The Out-Of-plane Electronic Dispersions in An Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide
Visualizing The Out-Of-plane Electronic Dispersions in An Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide
Letter
Xian P. Yang ,1,* Harrison LaBollita ,2 Zi-Jia Cheng ,1 Hari Bhandari,3 Tyler A. Cochran,1 Jia-Xin Yin,1
Md. Shafayat Hossain,1 Ilya Belopolski,1 Qi Zhang,1 Yuxiao Jiang,1 Nana Shumiya,1 Daniel Multer,1
Maksim Liskevich ,1 Dmitry A. Usanov,4 Yanliu Dang,5,6 Vladimir N. Strocov,4 Albert V. Davydov ,5
Nirmal J. Ghimire,3 Antia S. Botana,2 and M. Zahid Hasan1,7,†
1
Laboratory for Topological Quantum Matter and Advanced Spectroscopy (B7), Department of Physics,
Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
2
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA
3
Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Quantum Science and Engineering Center, George Mason University,
Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA
4
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
5
Materials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
6
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
7
Princeton Institute for Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
and Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
(Received 15 December 2021; revised 24 February 2022; accepted 1 March 2022; published 14 March 2022)
Layered transition metal dichalcogenides have a rich phase diagram and they feature two-dimensionality in
numerous physical properties. Co1/3 NbS2 is one of the newest members of this family where Co atoms are
intercalated into the van der Waals gaps between NbS2 layers. We study the three-dimensional electronic band
structure of Co1/3 NbS2 using both surface and bulk sensitive angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. We
show that the electronic bands do not fit into the rigid band shift picture after the Co intercalation. Instead,
Co1/3 NbS2 displays a different orbital character near the Fermi level compared to the pristine NbS2 compound
and has a clear band dispersion in the kz direction despite its layered structure. Our photoemission study
demonstrates the out-of-plane electronic correlations introduced by the Co intercalation, thus offering a different
perspective on this compound. Finally, we propose how Fermi level tuning could lead to exotic phases such as
spin density wave instability.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L121107
Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are a family nar orderings are also known to give rise to AHE [11–14].
of interesting materials hosting exotic properties including Recently, AHE has been proposed in some collinear antifer-
superconductivity, charge density waves (CDW), Mott insu- romagnets as well, mediated by their special arrangement of
lating phases, and nontrivial topology [1–4]. Moreover, these the magnetic atoms within the crystals [15–17]. Otherwise, a
layered materials feature various stacking patterns [5] such collinear antiferromagnet is not expected to display AHE.
as 2H and 3R. Many of them are also mechanically exfoli- The collinear antiferromagnetic structure of Co1/3 NbS2
able, enabling the realization of twistronics [6]. A well-known [18] does not support either of the above two criteria for
member in this family is 2H-NbS2 , a superconductor with a AHE. However, the electronic band structure calculated in the
critical temperature around 6 K [7]. paramagnetic state shows the presence of topological bands
Given the fact that these TMDs are layered materials, vari- close to the Fermi energy and thus it was proposed that either
ous types of atoms can be intercalated into the van der Waals a more complex magnetic structure inaccessible to the diffrac-
gaps. Therefore, intercalated TMDs form a new, large class of tion experiment in the 1980s or an interplay between the
materials with novel physical properties. For example, super- magnetic ordering and the electronic band structure accounts
conducting 2H-NbS2 can be intercalated by Fe and Co atoms for the large AHE [9]. While the apparent inconsistency with
to show an antiferromagnetic (AFM) order accompanied by respect to the magnetic structure calls for further studies on
a suppression of superconductivity [8]. Recently, a transport the magnetic ground state in this material, photoemission can
study [9] reported a large anomalous Hall effect (AHE) below visualize the band structure, thus serving as a direct way to
Néel temperature (TN ), which cannot be explained by the
understand the exotic AHE in Co1/3 NbS2 via studying its
presence of a small ferromagnetic moment. AHE has been
electronic structure. Moreover, a transport study on exfoliated
well known in ferromagnetic materials with a net magnetic
Co1/3 NbS2 crystals shows 60% AHE quantization per layer
moment and strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) [10]. Complex
antiferromagnetic textures such as noncollinear and noncopla- [19]. A natural next step is to seek for a quantized AHE in an
AFM. Nontrivial bands could help to materialize such a goal.
Motivated by these exciting results, we conduct angle-
*
[email protected] resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measure-
†
[email protected] ments on single crystals of Co1/3 NbS2 to understand its band
L121107-2
VISUALIZING THE OUT-OF-PLANE ELECTRONIC … PHYSICAL REVIEW B 105, L121107 (2022)
L121107-3
XIAN P. YANG et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 105, L121107 (2022)
FIG. 4. Strong out-of-plane dispersion after Co intercalation. (a) Constant energy map in the ky − kz plane at the binding energy of 2.5 eV.
High-symmetry energies are marked by the red and black lines, as periodic patterns along kz can be resolved. (b), (c) Fermi surface maps in the
kx − ky plane with incident photon energy of 413 and 370 eV corresponding to the red and black lines in (a), respectively. Dotted red triangles
are guides for the eyes. (d), (e) ARPES valence band dispersion along -M with bulk and surface sensitivity, respectively.
Since we already determine the positions of the and be seen from the Fermi surface map [Fig. 1(c)], which shows
A points from photon energy dependence, we can plot the two circles around ¯ in the second Brillouin zone. On the
Fermi surface maps corresponding to the two high-symmetry other hand, only one circle is shown at the same momentum
points, as shown in Figs. 4(b) and 4(c). The pockets at the position from soft x-ray data [Figs. 4(b) and 4(c)]. Such a
corners are changed with different kz positions. While pockets difference between VUV and soft x-ray ARPES indicates the
at K̄ are connected at the M̄ point in Fig. 4(b), they are band structure on the surface is slightly different from that in
disconnected in Fig. 4(c), suggesting a strong kz variation the bulk, possibly due to distinct environments at the surface
consistent with Fig. 4(a). The pocket around ¯ is also more or the relaxation of the cleaved surface. We also confirm that
obvious in Fig. 4(b). Therefore, we observe a clear evolution the nonobservation of the splitting in soft x-ray ARPES is not
of band structure in the -A direction despite the layered due to its lower momentum resolution (Fig. SI6 [30]).
crystal structure of Co1/3 NbS2 . We also note that, even with In conclusion, using a combination of ARPES and ab initio
surface sensitive VUV ARPES, Co1/3 NbS2 already demon- calculations, we map the band structure in Co1/3 NbS2 . We
strates a clear three-dimensional dispersion in the out-of-plane demonstrate a clear kz dispersion and show that Co interca-
direction compared to NbS2 at the Fermi level (Fig. SI5 lation does not simply fit into the rigid band shift picture.
[30]). Thus, the three-dimensional dispersion of the electronic Our work clearly points out how Co intercalation increases
bands in NbS2 is weak enough that the kz broadening in interactions in the out-of-plane direction by altering the quasi-
VUV completely quenches the ARPES dispersions, while in two-dimensional electronic bands in the pristine NbS2 to
Co1/3 NbS2 the bulk bands are much more pronounced so that hosting a three-dimensional nature after intercalation. Finally,
the kz broadening cannot smear them. Therefore, the Co atoms a comparison between low and high photon energies suggests
greatly increase the interactions along the kz direction. the surface environment is different from the bulk, thus in-
As we performed both surface and bulk sensitive ARPES ducing a pair of split bands on the surface. Given the layered
on the -M-K plane [Figs. 1(c) and 4(b)], it is natural to structure of this compound, and the large AHE value per
compare the band structure along the same high-symmetry di- layer in the exfoliated samples [19], it is necessary to perform
rection. We repeat the same surface sensitive valence band cut nano-ARPES on the exfoliated crystals in the future to under-
from Fig. 2(c) in Fig. 4(d), yet with photon energy in the soft stand how bands would change in the two-dimensional limit.
x-ray range. Thanks to the enhanced probe depth and sharp kz Moreover, as suggested by a recent work [35], it is possible
definition [34], the soft x-ray incident light increases the bulk to realize a tunable AHE system in Co1/3 NbS2 with various
sensitivity of the ARPES experiment and thus should reveal doping. Based on our ARPES and theoretical calculations, the
the intrinsic electronic structure of bulk Co1/3 NbS2 . The cor- Fermi surface consists of a hole pocket at and an electron
responding valence band dispersion along -M [Fig. 4(d)] is pocket at K in Co1/3 NbS2 . Furthermore, the size of the hole
similar to the surface sensitive result [Fig. 4(e)], with several pocket is slightly larger than that of the pocket at the corner.
linear bands crossing the Fermi level indicated by the red and This resembles the doped Fe-based superconductors, which
black arrows in Fig. 4(d). However, the linear band marked have a near-perfect nesting between hole and electron pockets
with the black arrow is split into two lines in Fig. 4(e). In fact, at the center and the corner with almost the same size [36].
only the inner branch is captured by our bulk band calculations SDW instability is proposed to arise from this nesting. Here
[Fig. 2(c)]. Therefore, DFT results agree with bulk sensitive in Co1/3 NbS2 , if the Fermi level is increased by doping, the
photoemission results, whereas VUV data demonstrate a band size of the two pockets will eventually become the same, thus
splitting, especially in the second Brillouin zone. This can also making it possible to realize SDW instability in this system,
L121107-4
VISUALIZING THE OUT-OF-PLANE ELECTRONIC … PHYSICAL REVIEW B 105, L121107 (2022)
which would largely enrich the phase diagram of intercalated i05. We acknowledge the Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen,
TMDs. Furthermore, there are several linear crossings [red Switzerland for provision of synchrotron radiation beam time
circles in Fig. 2(a)] near the Fermi level that are gapped by at the ADRESS beam line of the Swiss Light Source [40,41].
SOC. A large Berry curvature could form due to these SOC We thank C. Cacho and T. Kim for support at beamline
induced gaps like some kagome compounds [37,38]. As a i05 of Diamond Light Source. The authors also thank B.
result, they might be the source of the AHE in this compound. Thiagarajan, C. Polley, H. Fedderwitz, and J. Adell for beam
After submission of this work, we found a similar photoe- time support at Bloch. T.A.C. acknowledges the support of the
mission work [39] that focuses on how Co intercalation does National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
not fit into the rigid band shift picture from the pristine com- Program (Grant No. DGE-1656466). I.B. acknowledges the
pound. However, here we extend this point by demonstrating generous support of the Special Postdoctoral Researchers
a quasi-two-dimensional to three-dimensional band evolution Program, RIKEN during the late stages of this work. M.Z.H.
induced by Co intercalation. acknowledges support from Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory and the Miller Institute of Basic Research in
Work at Princeton University and Princeton-led Science at the University of California, Berkeley in the form
synchrotron-based ARPES measurements are supported of a Visiting Miller Professorship.
by the United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) X.P.Y., H.L., Z.-J.C.,H.B., and T.A.C. contributed equally
under the Basic Energy Sciences program (Grant No. to this work.
DOE/BES DE-FG-02-05ER46200). Crystal growth and Disclaimer: Certain commercial equipment, instruments,
properties characterization work at George Mason University or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify
is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification
Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science and is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement
Engineering Division. Theoretical calculations are supported by the National Institute of Standards and Technology
by NSF Grant No. DMR 1904716. The authors thank the nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equip-
MAX IV Laboratory for access to the Bloch Beamline. We ment identified are necessarily the best available for the
acknowledge Diamond Light Source for time on beamline purpose.
[1] B. Sipos, A. F. Kusmartseva, A. Akrap, H. Berger, L. Forró, and [15] S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88,
E. Tutiš, Nat. Mater. 7, 960 (2008). 123702 (2019).
[2] K. Rossnagel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 213001 (2011). [16] L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger,
[3] T. Ritschel, J. Trinckauf, K. Koepernik, B. Büchner, M. V. Phy. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).
Zimmermann, H. Berger, Y. I. Joe, P. Abbamonte, and J. Geck, [17] L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J.
Nat. Phys. 11, 328 (2015). Sinova, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
[4] Y. Li, Y. Xia, S. A. Ekahana, N. Kumar, J. Jiang, L. Yang, C. [18] S. S. P. Parkin, E. A. Marseglia, and P. J. Brown, J. Phys. C:
Chen, C. Liu, B. Yan, C. Felser, G. Li, Z. Liu, and Y. Chen, Solid State Phys. 16, 2765 (1983).
Phys. Rev. Materials 1, 074202 (2017). [19] G. Tenasini, E. Martino, N. Ubrig, N. J. Ghimire, H. Berger, O.
[5] J. A. Wilson and A. Yoffe, Adv. Phys. 18, 193 (1969). Zaharko, F. Wu, J. F. Mitchell, I. Martin, L. Forró, and A. F.
[6] K. L. Seyler, P. Rivera, H. Yu, N. P. Wilson, E. L. Ray, D. G. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023051 (2020).
Mandrus, J. Yan, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nature (London) 567, 66 [20] W. B. Clark, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 9, L693 (1976).
(2019). [21] S. S. P. Parkin and R. H. Friend, Philos. Mag. B 41, 65 (1980).
[7] I. Guillamón, H. Suderow, S. Vieira, L. Cario, P. Diener, and P. [22] P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen,
Rodière, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 166407 (2008). and L. D. Marks, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074101 (2020).
[8] R. H. Friend, A. R. Beal, and A. D. Yoffe, Philos. Mag. 35, 1269 [23] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77,
(1977). 3865 (1996).
[9] N. J. Ghimire, A. S. Botana, J. S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y.-S. Chen, [24] P. Liu, J. Han, and Q. Liu, arXiv:2107.09984.
and J. F. Mitchell, Nat. Commun. 9, 3280 (2018). [25] H. Park, O. Heinonen, and I. Martin, Phys. Rev. Materials 6,
[10] N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. 024201 (2022).
Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010). [26] S. S. Tsirkin, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 96,
[11] S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Nature (London) 527, 045102 (2017).
212 (2015). [27] G. Chang, B. J. Wieder, F. Schindler, D. S. Sanchez, I.
[12] A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Belopolski, S. Huang, B. Singh, D. Wu, T. Chang, T. Neupert,
Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. Kuebler, C. S. Xu, Hs. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Nat. Mater. 17, 978 (2018).
Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501870 (2016). [28] Z. El Youbi, S. W. Jung, C. Richter, K. Hricovini, C. Cacho, and
[13] T. Suzuki, R. Chisnell, A. Devarakonda, Y.-T. Liu, W. Feng, D. M. D. Watson, Phys. Rev. B 103, 155105 (2021).
Xiao, J. W. Lynn, and J. G. Checkelsky, Nat. Phys. 12, 1119 [29] N. Sirica, S.-K. Mo, F. Bondino, I. Pis, S. Nappini, P.
(2016). Vilmercati, J. Yi, Z. Gai, P. C. Snijders, P. K. Das, I. Vobornik,
[14] H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, N. Ghimire, M. R. Koehler, L. Li, D. Sapkota, D. S. Parker, D.
017205 (2014). G. Mandrus, and N. Mannella, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075141 (2016).
L121107-5
XIAN P. YANG et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 105, L121107 (2022)
[30] See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/ [37] L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. V. Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki,
10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L121107 for a comparison of the elec- C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, L. Fu,
tronic band structure in and, projection of d orbitals on the bulk R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Nature (London) 555, 638
bands in, and MDC analysis of the band crossing/splitting in (2018).
Co1/3 NbS2 . [38] J. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H. Tien,
[31] S. Hüfner, Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Springer, Berlin, 1995). N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian, Z. Song, G. Chang,
[32] A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. I. Belopolski, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z. Cheng, X. P. Yang,
75, 473 (2003). B. Swidler, H. Zhou, H. Lin et al., Nature (London) 583, 533
[33] P. Popčević, I. Batistić, A. Smontara, K. Velebit, J. Jaći-mović, (2020).
E. Martino, I. Živković, N. Tsyrulin, J. Piatek, H. Berger, A. A. [39] P. Popčević, Y. Utsumi, I. Biało, W. Tabis, M. A. Gala, M.
Sidorenko, H. M. Rønnow, N. Bar-išić, L. Forró, and E. Tutiš, Rosmus, J. J. Kolodziej, N. Tomaszewska, M. Grab, H. Berger,
arXiv:2003.08127. I. Batistić, N. Barišić, L. Forró, and E. Tutiš, arXiv:2111.12529.
[34] V. N. Strocov, M. Shi, M. Kobayashi, C. Monney, X. Wang, [40] V. N. Strocov, T. Schmitt, U. Flechsig, T. Schmidt, A. Imhof,
J. Krempasky, T. Schmitt, L. Patthey, H. Berger, and P. Blaha, Q. Chen, J. Raabe, R. Betemps, D. Zimoch, J. Krempasky,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 086401 (2012). X. Wang, M. Grioni, A. Piazzalunga, and L. Patthey, J.
[35] S. Mangelsen, P. Zimmer, C. Näther, S. Mankovsky, S. Polesya, Synchrotron Radiat. 17, 631 (2010).
H. Ebert, and W. Bensch, Phys. Rev. B 103, 184408 (2021). [41] V. N. Strocov, X. Wang, M. Shi, M. Kobayashi, J. Krempasky,
[36] A. V. Chubukov, D. V. Efremov, and I. Eremin, Phys. Rev. B C. Hess, T. Schmitt, and L. Patthey, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21,
78, 134512 (2008). 32 (2014).
L121107-6