(Download PDF) Braddoms Rehabilitation Care A Clinical Handbook David X Cifu Full Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Braddoms Rehabilitation Care A Clinical Handbook David X Cifu Full Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Braddoms Rehabilitation Care A Clinical Handbook David X Cifu Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/braddoms-physical-medicine-and-
rehabilitation-sixth-edition-david-x-cifu/
https://ebookmass.com/product/clinical-orthopaedic-
rehabilitation-a-team-approach-e-book-4th-edition-ebook-pdf-
version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-handbook-of-rehabilitation-
medicine-3rd-edition-manoj-sivan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-handbook-of-rehabilitation-
medicine-3rd-edition-manoj-sivan-2/
Oxford Handbook of Rehabilitation Medicine 3rd Edition
Edition Ian Baguley
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-handbook-of-rehabilitation-
medicine-3rd-edition-edition-ian-baguley/
https://ebookmass.com/product/current-practice-guidelines-in-
primary-care-2020-jacob-a-david/
https://ebookmass.com/product/handbook-of-mineral-spectroscopy-x-
ray-photoelectron-spectra-volume-1-x-ray-photoelectron-
spectra-1st-edition-j-theo-kloprogge/
https://ebookmass.com/product/sjogrens-syndrome-a-clinical-
handbook-1st-edition-m-d-vivino/
https://ebookmass.com/product/clinical-orthopaedic-
rehabilitation-a-team-approach-4th-edition-edition-charles-e-
giangarra-and-robert-c-manske-auth/
Any screen.
Any time.
Anywhere.
Activate the eBook version
ge.
of this title at no additional charge.
Expert Consult eBooks give you the power to browse and find content,
view enhanced images, share notes and highlights—both online and offline.
Use of the current edition of the electronic version of this book (eBook) is subject to the terms of the nontransferable, limited license
granted on expertconsult.inkling.com. Access to the eBook is limited to the first individual who redeems the PIN, located on the inside
cover of this book, at expertconsult.inkling.com and may not be transferred to another party by resale, lending, or other means.
BRADDOM’S
REHABILITATION
CARE
A Clinical Handbook
This page intentionally left blank
BRADDOM’S
REHABILITATION
CARE
A Clinical Handbook
David X. Cifu, MD
Chairman
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Herman J. Flax, MD Professor
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
Principal Investigator
Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium
Richmond, Virginia
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage
and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to
seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright
Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by
the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional prac-
tices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge
in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described
herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety
and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
With respect to any drug or pharmaceutical products identified, readers are advised
to check the most current information provided (i) on procedures featured or (ii) by the
manufacturer of each product to be administered, to verify the recommended dose or
formula, the method and duration of administration, and contraindications. It is the
responsibility of practitioners, relying on their own experience and knowledge of their
patients, to make diagnoses, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each indi-
vidual patient, and to take all appropriate safety precautions.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors,
or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a
matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any
methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Joseph Burris, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri
Chein-Wei Chang, MD
Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan
v
vi Contributors
Chih-Kuang Chen, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, Taiwan
Chen-Liang Chou, MD
Director and Clinical Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Yang-Ming University
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
David X. Cifu, MD
Chairman
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Herman J. Flax, MD Professor
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
Principal Investigator
Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma
Consortium
Richmond, Virginia
Contributors vii
Blessen C. Eapen, MD
Section Chief, Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center
TBI/Polytrauma Fellowship Program Director
South Texas Veterans Health Care System
Associate Professor
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
UT Health San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas
Gerard E. Francisco, MD
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth)
McGovern Medical School
NeuroRecovery Research Center
TIRR Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas
Elizabeth J. Halmai, DO
Medical Director, Section Chief
Division of Polytrauma
South Texas Veterans Health Care System
Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas
Ziad M. Hawamdeh, MD
Senior Fellowship of the European Board of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation
Jordanian Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Faculty of Medicine
University of Jordan
Amman, Jordan
Ming-Yen Hsiao, MD
Lecturer
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Taiwan University Hospital
College of Medicine
National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan
Lin-Fen Hsieh, MD
Professor
School of Medicine
Fu Jen Catholic University
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Director
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Shin Kong Wo Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Contributors ix
Chen-Yu Hung, MD
Attending Physician
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Taiwan University Hospital, Beihu Branch
Taipei, Taiwan
Wai-Keung Lee, MD
Chief, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Tao Yuan General Hospital
Tao Yuan, Taiwan
Chia-Wei Lin, MD
Attending Physician
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin Chu Branch
Hsin Chu, Taiwan
Ding-Hao Liu, MD
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuanshan Branch
Yilan, Taiwan
Vishwa S. Raj, MD
Director of Oncology Rehabilitation
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Carolinas Rehabilitation
Chief of Cancer Rehabilitation
Department of Supportive Care
Levine Cancer Institute
Carolinas Healthcare System
Charlotte, North Carolina
Desiree L. Roge, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Baylor College of Medicine
Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Texas Children’s Hospital
Houston, Texas
xii Contributors
Shaw-Gang Shyu, MD
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Chueh-Hung Wu, MD
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei City, Taiwan
Yung-Tsan Wu, MD
Attending Physician and Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Tri-Service General Hospital and School of Medicine
National Defense Medical Center
Taipei, Taiwan
Mauro Zampolini, MD
Chief
Department of Rehabilitation
Italian National Health Service, USL UMBRIA 2
Foligno, Perugia, Italy
Preface
Over the past 4 years, we have worked diligently with more than 200 authors from
across the international community to create (1) the fifth edition of the textbook
Braddom’s Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and (2) Braddom’s Rehabilitation Care:
A Clinical Handbook. These complementary resources compile key elements of the
field of disability medicine, ranging from the basic sciences to clinical care. While
the Braddom’s textbook is the premier reference for all academicians and practitio-
ners in physical medicine and rehabilitation, this new clinical handbook represents
the first comprehensive practical guide for trainees and practitioners across all ele-
ments of health care. Any student or clinician who sees, evaluates, manages, or
refers individuals with disability should use this handbook as his or her key source
for information. Whether the patient is a young adult with an acute combat-related
musculoskeletal injury, a teen with a sports medicine injury, an elderly person with
joint or neurologic dysfunction, a child with specialized equipment needs, or a
middle-aged individual after a life-altering trauma, this text can serve as a guide
for each patient’s clinical care. In addition to practical information and clinical
pearls, this handbook also features accompanying online slides and training mate-
rials to enhance understanding, to serve as part of core educational modules, and
to expand on the key points of the text. We are indebted to the authors of Brad-
dom’s Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation for providing the comprehensive materials
from which this clinical handbook was abstracted, the more than 50 authors who
worked meticulously to develop this special edition, and the editorial support staff
at Elsevier. We are hopeful that this handbook will be used throughout the world
to support the training of health care professionals working with individuals with
disabilities and to enhance the clinical care of those individuals with disabilities. It
is a resource that we would see in any health care and training setting and used by
the full range of trainees and practitioners. We also welcome feedback from readers
and users of it to improve the quality and usability of future iterations and editions.
xv
This page intentionally left blank
Foreword
There are more than 1 billion individuals with some degree of disability, physical or
mental, in the world, and there are a growing number of practicing clinicians and
trainees to assist them in achieving and maintaining their independence. However,
there has not been a single, easy-to-use clinical guide to specifically assist these
practitioners to optimize their care. This handbook brings together all the key ele-
ments of practical clinical care in physical and rehabilitation medicine found in the
fifth edition of Braddom’s Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation into a single, convenient
source. The compact size, clinical focus, and state-of-the-art online resources make
it the must-have guide. It has been designed to be invaluable at the bedside, in the
clinic, in the office, and even in the patient’s home. Written in a straightforward
style, supported by online slides, and packed with clinical pearls, this handbook
is perfect for the full range of professionals, from the beginning student to the
advanced practitioner. Created by two of the leading international educators in the
field of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Drs. David Cifu and Henry Lew, this
book was carefully compiled by more than 50 professionals in physical medicine
and rehabilitation from more than 25 countries across the globe to reflect the latest
in the field, while remaining consistent with the Braddom’s reference textbook. It is
truly the must-have resource for all trainees and clinicians who see individuals with
acute and chronic disabilities.
xvii
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
SECTION I EVALUATION
8 Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 44
Chein-Wei Chang
13 Spinal Orthoses, 85
Wai-Keung Lee
xix
xx Contents
23 Spasticity, 157
Gerard E. Francisco
26 B urns, 178
Amaramalar Selvi Naicker
28 C
hronic Medical Conditions: Pulmonary Disease, Organ
Transplantation, and Diabetes, 190
Chen-Liang Chou
34 Osteoporosis, 238
Francesca Gimigliano
42 Myopathy, 299
Ziad M. Hawamdeh
45 D
egenerative Movement Disorders of the Central
Nervous System, 319
Andrew Malcolm Dermot Cole
xxii Contents
25 Vascular Diseases
Video 25.1. M onophasic Ar terial Doppler Waveform
31 Rheumatologic Rehabilitation
Video 31.1. Feeding Training with Putty
xxiii
This page intentionally left blank
BRADDOM’S
REHABILITATION
CARE
A Clinical Handbook
This page intentionally left blank
SECTION 1
EVALUATION
8 Electrodiagnostic Medicine
Chein-Wei Chang
1
This page intentionally left blank
The Physiatric
History and Physical
1
Examination
Shaw-Gang Shyu
The physiatric history and physical examination are the basis for precise diagnosis
and recognition of the patient’s impairment, and they help in the development of a
comprehensive treatment plan. They also serve as a medicolegal record and a basis
for physician billing. They are documents used for communication between reha-
bilitation and nonrehabilitation health care professionals. The essential elements
of the physiatric history and physical examination are summarized in this chapter
and the accompanying eSlides.
Chief Complaint
The chief complaint is the symptom or concern that caused the patient to seek
medical treatment. Unlike the relatively objective physical examination, the chief
complaint is purely subjective, and the physician should use the patient’s own
words.
3
4 SECTION I EVALUATION
of onset, quality, context, severity, duration, modifying factors, and associated signs
and symptoms.
MOBILITY
Mobility is the ability to move about in one’s environment. Bed mobility includes
turning from side to side, changing from the prone to supine positions, sitting up,
and lying down. Transfer mobility includes getting in and out of bed, standing
from the sitting position, and moving between a wheelchair and another seat.
Wheelchair mobility can be assessed by asking if patients can propel the
wheelchair independently, how far or how long they can go without resting,
whether they need assistance with managing the wheelchair parts, and the extent
to which they can move about at home, in the community, and up and down
ramps. Whether the home is potentially wheelchair accessible is particularly
important in cases of new onset of severe disability.
Ambulation and stair mobility can be assessed by the patient’s walking distance
and endurance, the patient’s requirement for assistive devices and need for breaks,
the number of stairs the patient must routinely climb and descend at home or in the
community, and the presence or absence of handrails in their daily lives. Identify-
ing associated symptoms during ambulation and a history of falling or instability
are also important.
Driving (a type of community mobility) is a crucial activity for many people,
and older adults who stop driving face increased depressive symptoms. The risks of
driving are weighed against the consequences of not being able to drive.
COGNITION
Cognition is the mental process of knowing. Because persons with cognitive defi-
cits often cannot recognize their own impairments (agnosia), it is important to also
gather information from other individuals who are familiar with the patient. Cog-
nitive deficits interfere with the patient’s rehabilitation and safety.
COMMUNICATION
Communication skills are used to convey information, including thoughts, needs,
and emotions. Verbal-expression deficits can be subtle. Patients who have deficits
in verbal expression might or might not be able to communicate through other
means, known as augmentative communication strategies. These strategies include
writing and physicality (e.g., sign language, gestures, and body language) and the
use of communication aids (e.g., picture, letter, word board, and electronic devices).
CHAPTER 1 The Physiatric History and Physical Examination 5
Social History
Understanding the patient’s home environment and living situation includes ask-
ing whether the patient lives in a house or an apartment and whether elevators,
stairs, or handrails are present. These factors, in conjunction with the level of sup-
port from the patient’s family and friends, will help determine the discharge plans.
Patients should be asked in a nonjudgmental manner about their history of
smoking, alcohol use or abuse, and drug abuse. Sexuality is particularly important
to patients in their reproductive years. Sexual orientation and safer sex practices
should be addressed when appropriate.
VOCATIONAL ACTIVITIES
Vocation is a source of financial security and provides self-confidence and even
identity. The history should include the patient’s education level, recent work his-
tory, and ability to fulfill job requirements subsequent to injury or illness.
RECREATION
Loss or limitation of the ability to engage in hobbies and recreational activities can
be stressful to most people. Recreation is also a primary outcome in sports medi-
cine. A recreational therapist can be helpful.
LITIGATION
Litigation (active or pending) can be a source of anxiety, depression, or guilt.
Patients should be asked in a nonjudgmental manner whether they are involved in
litigation. The answer should not change the treatment plan.
6 SECTION I EVALUATION
Family History
Patients should be asked about the health, or cause and age of death, of parents and
siblings. The family history will help identify genetic disorders within the family
and potential assistance that may be obtained from family members.
Review of Systems
The review of systems identifies problems or diseases that have not yet been
reviewed during the history taking.
Attention. Attention is the ability to address a specific stimulus for a short period
of time without being distracted by internal or external stimuli. Vigilance is the
ability to hold one’s attention over longer periods. Attention is tested by digit re-
call; repeating seven numbers in the forward direction is considered normal, with
fewer than five indicating significant attention deficits.
Orientation. Orientation is composed of four parts: person, place, time, and situ-
ation. Sense of time is usually the first to be lost, and sense of person is typically
the last. Temporary stress can account for a minor loss of orientation, but major
disorientation usually suggests an organic brain syndrome.
Memory. The components of memory include learning, retention, and recall. The
patient is typically asked to remember three or four objects or words and then
asked to repeat the items immediately to assess immediate acquisition (encoding)
of the information. Retention is assessed by recall after a delayed interval, usually
5 to 10 minutes. Normal individuals younger than 60 years should be able to recall
three of four items. Recent memory can be tested by asking questions about the
past 24 hours. Remote memory is tested by asking where the patient was born or
which school or college the patient attended.
Insight and judgment. Insight has been conceptualized into three components:
awareness of impairment, need for treatment, and attribution of symptoms. Recog-
nizing that one has an impairment is the initial step necessary for recovery. A lack
of insight can severely hamper a patient’s progress in rehabilitation.
Judgment is an estimate of a person’s ability to solve real-life problems, and
it is related to the patient’s capacity for independent functioning. Judgment can
be evaluated by simply observing the patient’s behavior or by noting the patient’s
responses to hypothetical situations.
Mood and affect. The examiner should document reactivity and stability of mood.
Mood can be described in terms such as being happy, sad, euphoric, blue, de-
pressed, angry, or anxious. Affect describes how a patient feels at a given moment,
which can be described by terms such as blunted, flat, inappropriate, labile, opti-
mistic, or pessimistic.
COMMUNICATION
Aphasia. Aphasia involves the loss of production or comprehension of language.
Naming, repetition, comprehension, and fluency are the key components. Testing
8 SECTION I EVALUATION
Cranial nerve II: optic nerve. The optic nerve is assessed by testing visual acuity
and visual fields. Visual acuity refers to central vision. Visual field testing assesses
the integrity of the optic pathway. Testing visual fields is most commonly per-
formed by confrontation. For patients with deficits, further assessment by a neuro-
optometrist or visually trained occupational therapist can be helpful.
Cranial nerves III, IV, and VI: oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves. The
oculomotor nerve innervates the medial rectus muscle (adductor of the eye), supe-
rior rectus and inferior oblique muscles (elevators of the eye), and inferior rectus
muscle (depressor of the eye). The trochlear nerve innervates the superior oblique
muscle, which is responsible for the downward gaze, especially during adduction.
The abducens nerve controls the lateral rectus muscle, which abducts the eye. The
examiner should assess the alignment of the patient’s eyes while the eyes are at rest
and when the eyes are following an object, observing the full range of horizontal
CHAPTER 1 The Physiatric History and Physical Examination 9
and vertical eye movements in the six cardinal directions. The optic (afferent) and
oculomotor (efferent) nerves are involved with the pupillary light reflex, which
normally results in constriction of both pupils when a light stimulus is presented to
either eye separately. A characteristic head tilt when looking downward is some-
times seen in CN IV lesions.
Cranial nerve VII: facial nerve. The facial nerve is first examined by observing the
patient while he or she is talking, smiling, closing the eyes, flattening the nasolabial
fold, and elevating one corner of the mouth. The patient is then asked to wrinkle
the forehead (frontalis muscle function), close the eyes while the examiner attempts
to open them (orbicularis oculi function), puff out both cheeks while the examiner
presses on the cheeks (buccinator function), and show the teeth (orbicularis oris
function). A peripheral injury to the facial nerve, such as Bell palsy, affects both
the upper and lower face, whereas a central lesion typically affects mainly the lower
face.
Cranial nerve XI: accessory nerve. Atrophy or asymmetry of the patient’s trape-
zius and sternocleidomastoid muscles should be checked. Trapezius atrophy results
in a laterally migrated scapula (“open door” winging). To test the strength of the
sternocleidomastoid muscle, the patient should be asked to rotate the head against
resistance.
Cranial nerve XII: hypoglossal nerve. The hypoglossal nerve is tested by asking
the patient to protrude the tongue and noting evidence of atrophy, fasciculation,
10 SECTION I EVALUATION
MOTOR CONTROL
Strength. Manual muscle testing (eSlides 1.7 and 1.8) provides an important
method of quantifying strength. Pain can result in give-way weakness. It is impor-
tant to recognize the presence of substitution when muscles are weak or movement
is uncoordinated. Patients who cannot actively control muscle tension (e.g., those
with spasticity) are not appropriate for standard manual muscle testing methods.
A muscle grade of 3 is functionally important because antigravity strength implies
that a limb can be used for activity. Females’ strength typically increases up to 20
years, plateaus through the twenties, and then gradually declines after age 30 years.
Males increase strength up to age 20 years and then plateau until older than 30
years before declining.
Tables 1.13 and 1.14 in Braddom’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fifth Edi-
tion (ISBN: 978-0-323-28046-4), summarize joint movements, innervation, and
manual strength testing techniques for all major muscle groups of the extremities.
Examples of tests for shoulder abduction are shown in eSlide 1.9.
The Romberg test can be used to differentiate a cerebellar deficit from a pro-
prioceptive deficit. If loss of balance is present when the eyes are open or closed,
it is indicative of cerebellar ataxia. If loss of balance occurs only when the eyes are
closed, it is a positive Romberg sign, which indicates a proprioceptive (sensory)
deficit.
Apraxia. Apraxia is the loss of the ability to carry out programmed or planned
movements despite adequate understanding of the task and no weakness or sensory
loss. Ideomotor apraxia occurs when a patient cannot carry out motor commands
but can perform the required movements under different circumstances. Ideational
apraxia refers to the inability to carry out sequences of acts, although each compo-
nent can be performed separately. Dressing apraxia and constructional apraxia are
the result of neglect rather than actual deficits in motor planning.
Tone. Tone is the resistance of a muscle to stretch or passively elongate (see Chap-
ter 23). Spasticity is a velocity-dependent increase in the stretch reflex, whereas
rigidity is the resistance of the limb to passive movement in the relaxed state (non–
velocity-dependent).
Tone can be quantified by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). A pendulum
test can also be used to quantify spasticity. The Tardieu Scale has been suggested
as a more appropriate clinical measure of spasticity than the MAS. Measurements
are usually taken at three velocities (V1, V2, and V3). V1 is measured as slow as
possible, V2 is measured at the speed of the limb falling under gravity, and V3 is
measured when the limb is moving as fast as possible. Responses are recorded at
each velocity and at the angles (in degrees) at which the muscle response occurs.
REFLEXES
Superficial reflexes (eSlide 1.10). The normal plantar reflex consists of flexion
of the great toe or no response. With dysfunction of the corticospinal tract, there
is a positive Babinski sign, which consists of dorsiflexion of the great toe with an
associated fanning of the other toes. A positive Chaddock sign refers to dorsiflex-
ion of the great toe after stroking from the lateral ankle to the lateral dorsal foot.
A positive Stransky sign refers to an upgoing great toe after flipping the little toe
outward.
Muscle stretch reflexes (eSlide 1.11). Muscle stretch reflexes, which were called
deep tendon reflexes in the past, are assessed by tapping the skin overlying the
muscle tendon with a reflex hammer. The response is assessed as 0, no response;
1+, diminished but present and might require facilitation; 2+, usual response; 3+,
brisker than usual; and 4+, hyperactive with clonus. Reinforcement maneuvers,
such as the Jendrassik maneuver, assist examination.
12 SECTION I EVALUATION
Primitive reflexes. Primitive reflexes are abnormal reflexes that represent devel-
opmental regression, indicating significant neurologic abnormalities in adults. Ex-
amples of primitive reflexes include the sucking reflex, rooting reflex, grasp reflex,
snout reflex, and palmomental response.
GAIT
Gait is a series of rhythmic, alternating movements of the limbs and trunk that
result in the forward progression of the center of gravity. Gait is dependent on
input from several systems, including the visual, vestibular, cerebellar, motor, and
sensory systems. Gait disorders have stereotypical patterns that reflect injury to
various aspects of the neurologic system (eSlide 1.12).
Musculoskeletal Examination
The musculoskeletal (MSK) examination incorporates inspection, palpation, pas-
sive and active range of movement (ROM), assessment of joint stability, manual
muscle testing, joint-specific provocative maneuvers, and special tests. Readers may
view Table 1.9 in Braddom’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fifth Edition, for
details and reliability of joint-specific provocative maneuvers.
INSPECTION
Inspection includes observing mood, signs of pain or discomfort, functional
impairments, or evidence of malingering (e.g., Waddell signs). The spine should
be inspected for scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis, whereas limbs should be exam-
ined for symmetry, circumference, and contour. Muscle atrophy, masses, edema,
scars, skin breakdown, and fasciculations should also be checked. Joints should be
inspected for deformity, visible swelling, and erythema.
Kinetic chain refers to the summation of individual joint movements linked in
a series, leading to the production of a larger functional goal. A change in move-
ment of a single joint may affect the motion of adjacent, as well as distant, joints
in the chain. This may result in asymmetric patterns causing disease at seemingly
unrelated sites.
PALPATION
Palpation is used to identify tender areas and localize trigger points, muscle guard-
ing, or spasticity. Joints and soft tissues should be assessed for effusion, warmth,
masses, tight muscle bands, tone, and crepitus.
Clinical Pearls
A comprehensive rehabilitation physiatric history and physical examination help
develop a treatment plan with proper goals.
The physiatric history and physical examination begin with the standard medical
format but go beyond that to assess impairment, activity limitation (disability), and
participation (handicap).
Identifying and treating the primary impairments to maximize performance is the
primary thrust of physiatric evaluation and treatment.
Physiatrists’ understanding of the MSK principles and MSK examination distin-
guishes them from neurologists and neurosurgeons. Bilateral examination is critical.
Physiatrists’ understanding of neurology and the neurologic examination distin-
guishes them from orthopedists and rheumatologists.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The complete bibliography is available on ExpertConsult.com.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Adams RD, Victor M: Principles of neurology, ed 8, New York, 2005, McGraw-
Hill.
2. Alexander RD, Catalano LW, Barron OA, Glickel SZ: The extensor pollicis
brevis entrapment test in the treatment of de Quervain’s disease, J Hand Surg
[Am] 27:813–816, 2002.
3. American Medical Association: Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment,
ed 4, Chicago, 1993, American Medical Association.
4. Anonymous: Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: domain and pro-
cess, Am J Occup Ther 56:609–639, 2002 (Erratum in: Am J Occup Ther
2003;57:115).
5. Bates BA: Guide to physical examination and history taking, ed 7, Philadelphia,
1998, Lippincott.
6. Beasley WC: Quantitative muscle testing: principles and application to re-
search and clinical services, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 42:398–425, 1961.
7. Beers MH, Berkow R, editors: Merck manual of geriatrics, West Point, 2000,
Merck.
8. Bell BD, Hoshizak TB: Relationships of age and sex with range of motion of
seventeen joint actions in humans, Can J Appl Sport Sci 6:202–206, 1981.
9. Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP: Clinical diagnosis of an anterior
cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–
288, 2006.
10. Berger N, Fishman S, editors: Lower-limb prosthetics, New York, 1997,
Prosthetics-Orthotics Publications.
11. Birchwood M, Smith J, Drury V, et al.: A self-report insight scale for psychosis:
reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change, Acta Psychiatr Scand 89:62–67,
1994.
12. Brannon GE: History and mental status examination, 2002. Available at:
<www.emedicine.com>.
13. Broadhurst N, Bond M: Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac
joint dysfunction, J Spinal Disord 11:341–345, 1998.
14. Caffarra P: Alexia without agraphia or hemianopia, Eur Neurol 27(2):65–71,
1987.
15. Campbell W, editor: Dejong’s: the neurological examination, ed 6, Philadelphia,
2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
16. Cave EF, Roberts SM: A method for measuring and recording joint function,
J Bone Joint Surg Am 18(2):455–466, 1936.
17. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Available at: http://www.cms.gov/
Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNEd/We
bGuide/EMDOC.html.
18. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Document guidelines. Available
at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/down
loads/bp102c01.pdf.
19. Chally PS, Carlson JM: Spirituality, rehabilitation, and aging: a literature re-
view, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(Suppl 3):S60–S65, 2004.
20. Choa RM, Parvizi N, Giele HP: A prospective case-control study to com-
pare the sensitivity and specificity of the grind and traction-shift (subluxation-
relocation) clinical tests in osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint,
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39:282–285, 2014.
13.e1
13.e2 Bibliography
21. Cole TM, Tobis JS: Measurement of musculoskeletal function. In Kottke FJ,
Stillwell GK, Lehmann JF, editors: Handbook of physical medicine and rehabilita-
tion, ed 3, Philadelphia, 1982, Saunders.
22. Corrigan JD: Substance abuse as a mediating factor in outcome from traumatic
brain injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:302–309, 1995.
23. Chronopoulos E, Kim TK, Park HB, et al.: Diagnostic value of physical tests
for isolated chronic acromioclavicular lesions, Am J Sports Med 32:655–661,
2004.
24. Cutter NC, Kevorkian CG: Handbook of manual muscle testing, New York,
1999, McGraw-Hill.
25. DeGowin RL: DeGowin’s diagnostic examination, ed 6, New York, 1994,
McGraw-Hill.
26. de César PC, Avila EM, de Abreu MR: Comparison of magnetic resonance im-
aging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain,
Foot Ankle Int 32:1110–1114, 2011.
27. DeLisa JA, Currie DM, Martin GM: Rehabilitation medicine: past, present and
future, ed 3, Philadelphia, 1998, Lippincott.
28. Eisenman CA: Information systems in the rehabilitation setting: the multidis-
ciplinary approach, Top Health Inf Manage 19:1–9, 1999.
29. Enelow AJ, Forde DL, Brummel-Smith K: Interviewing and patient care, ed 4,
New York, 1996, Oxford University Press.
30. Fishman LM, Dombi GW, Michaelsen C, et al.: Piriformis syndrome: diagno-
sis, treatment and outcome—a 10-year study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:295–
301, 2002.
31. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-Mental State: a practical meth-
od for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician, J Psychiatr Res
12:189–198, 1975.
32. Froehling DA, Bowen JM, Mohr DN, et al.: The canalith repositioning proce-
dure for the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized
controlled trial, Mayo Clin Proc 75:695–700, 2000.
33. Gabriel SE, Jaakkimainen L, Bombardier C: Risk for serious gastrointestinal
complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-
analysis, Ann Intern Med 115:787–796, 1991.
34. Gerhardt JJ, Rondinelli RD: Goniometric techniques for range-of-motion as-
sessment, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 12:507–527, 2001.
35. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff N: Assessment and rehabilitation management
of individuals with disorders of consciousness. In Zasler ND, Katz DI,
Zafonte RD, editors: Brain injury medicine: principles and practice, New York,
2007, Demos.
36. Gillard J, Pérez-Cousin M, Hachulla E, et al.: Diagnosing thoracic outlet syn-
drome: contribution of provocative tests, ultrasonography, electrophysiology,
and helical computed tomography in 48 patients, Joint Bone Spine 68:416–424,
2001.
37. Gilman S: Manter and Gatz’s essentials of clinical neuroanatomy and neurophysiol-
ogy, ed 8, Philadelphia, 2003, FA Davis.
38. Goldberg S: The four-minute neurologic exam, Miami, 1999, Medmaster.
39. Griffin MR, Yared A, Ray WA: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
acute renal failure in elderly persons, Am J Epidemiol 151:488–496, 2000.
40. Groah SL, Lanig IS: Neuromusculoskeletal syndromes in wheelchair athletes,
Semin Neurol 20:201–208, 2000.
Bibliography 13.e3
41. Haugh AB, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR: A systematic review of the Tardieu
Scale for the measurement of spasticity, Disabil Rehabil 28:899–907, 2006.
42. Haymaker W, Woodhall B: Peripheral nerve injuries, Philadelphia, 1953, Saun-
ders.
43. Hegedus EJ, Cook C, Hasselblad V, et al.: Physical examination tests for as-
sessing a torn meniscus in the knee: a systematic review with meta-analysis, J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:541–550, 2007.
44. Helsey-Grove D, Danehy LN, Consolzio M, et al.: A national study of chal-
lenges to electronic health record adoption and meaningful use, Med Care
52:144–148, 2014.
45. Hislop HJ: Daniels and Worthingham’s muscle testing: techniques of manual exami-
nation, ed 6, Philadelphia, 1995, Saunders.
46. Hoppenfeld S: Physical examination of the spine and extremities, Norwalk, 1976,
Appleton & Lange.
47. Jenkins DB: Hollinshead’s functional anatomy of the limbs and back, ed 7, Philadel-
phia, 1998, Saunders.
48. Jennett B, Teasdale G: Assessment of impaired consciousness, Contemp Neuro-
surg 20:78, 1981.
49. Joint Commission: Facts about patient safety. Available at: <http://www.jointc
ommision.org/patientsafety>.
50. Karandikar N, Vargas OO: Kinetic chains: a review of the concept and its clini-
cal applications, PM R 3:739–745, 2011.
51. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG: Muscles: testing and function, Balti-
more, 1993, Williams & Wilkins.
52. Knapp ME: Measuring range of motion, Postgrad Med 42:A123–A127, 1967.
53. Knapp ME, West CC: Measurement of joint motion, Univ Minn Med Bull
15:405–412, 1944.
54. Kottke FJ, Lehman JF, editors: Krusen’s handbook of physical medicine, ed 4, Phil-
adelphia, 1990, Saunders.
55. Laslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB: Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint
pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composite tests, Man Ther
10:207–218, 2005.
56. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW: Neurological assessment, ed 4, New
York, 2004, Oxford University Press.
57. Levangie PK: Four clinical tests of sacroiliac joint dysfunction: the association
of test results with innominate torsion among patients with and without back
pain, Phys Ther 79:1043–1057, 1999.
58. Lindsay KW, Bone I, Callander R: Neurology and neurosurgery illustrated, ed 3,
New York, 1997, Churchill Livingstone.
59. Magee DJ: Orthopedic physical assessment, ed 3, Philadelphia, 1997, Saunders.
60. Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S: The sensitivity and specificity of the
SLUMP and straight leg raised tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation, J
Clin Rheumatol 14:87–91, 2008.
61. Malanga GA, Nadler SF, editors: Musculoskeletal physical examination: an evi-
dence-based approach, Philadelphia, 2006, Mosby.
62. Examination of the nervous system: In Mancall EL, editor: Alpers and Mancall’s
essentials of the neurologic examination, ed 2, Philadelphia, 1981, FA Davis.
63. Marks MC, Alexander J, Sutherland DH, Chambers HG: Clinical utility of the
Duncan-Ely test for rectus femoris dysfunction during the swing phase of gait,
Dev Med Child Neurol 45:763–768, 2003.
13.e4 Bibliography
64. Marottoli RA, Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, et al.: Driving cessation and
increased depressive symptoms: prospective evidence from the New Haven
EPESE. Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, J
Am Geriatr Soc 45:202–206, 1997.
65. Martin RA, Lee EK, Langston EL: The neurologic examination: the family prac-
tice curriculum in neurology, 2001. Available at: <www.aan.com/familypractice>.
66. Maslowski E, Sullivan W, Forster Harwood J, et al.: The diagnostic validity
of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology, PM R
2:174–181, 2010.
67. Members of the Department of Neurology: Mayo Clinic examination in neurol-
ogy, ed 7, Rochester, 1998, Mayo Clinic and Cano Foundation.
68. Molnar GE, Alexander MA, editors: Pediatric rehabilitation, ed 3, Philadelphia,
1999, Hanley and Belfus.
69. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al.: The Montreal Cognitive As-
sessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment, J Am
Geriatr Soc 53:695–699, 2005.
70. Norkin CC, White J: Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry, ed 3,
Philadelphia, 2003, FA Davis.
71. O’Driscoll SW, Lawton RL, Smith AM: The “moving valgus stress test” for
medial collateral ligament tears of the elbow, Am J Sports Med 33:231–239,
2005.
72. O’Sullivan SB: Assessment of motor function. In O’Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ,
editors: Physical rehabilitation: assessment and treatment, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2001,
FA Davis.
73. Palmer JB, Drennan JC, Baba M: Evaluation and treatment of swallowing im-
pairments, Am Fam Physician 61:2453–2462, 2000.
74. Palmer ML, Epler ME: Fundamentals of musculoskeletal assessment techniques, ed
2, New York, 1998, Lippincott.
75. Park HB, Yokota A, Gill HS, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for
different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome, J Bone Joint Surg Am
87:1446–1455, 2005.
76. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, et al.: Classification of walking handicap in the
stroke population, Stroke 26:982–989, 1995.
77. Scalan J, Borson S: The Mini-Cog: receiver operating characteristics with ex-
pert and naive raters, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 16:216–222, 2001.
78. Silva L, Andréu JL, Muñoz P, et al.: Accuracy of physical examination in sub-
acromial impingement syndrome, Rheumatology 47:679–683, 2008.
79. Snodgrass SR: Myoclonus: analysis of monoamine, GABA, and other systems,
FASEB J 4:2775–2788, 1990.
80. Stewart MA: Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes:
a review, CMAJ 152:1423–1433, 1995.
81. Stolov WC: Evaluation of the patient. In Kottke FJ, Stillwell GK, Lehmann
JF, editors: Handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation, ed 3, Philadelphia,
1982, Saunders.
82. Stolov WC, Hayes RM, Kraft GH, editors: Treatment strategies in chronic dis-
ease and disability: a contemporary approach to medical practice, New York, 1994,
Demos.
83. Strub RL, Black FW: The mental status examination in neurology, ed 4, Philadel-
phia, 2000, FA Davis.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
commencement regarded them with great contempt, and appears to
have been making the experiment whether hardship would kill them
or not, grew reconciled to his charge, perceiving that they would not
die, and introduced them as they proceeded to various powerful and
wealthy Mongols, who seem to have treated them kindly, offering
them, in return for their prayers, gold, and silver, and costly
garments. The Hindoos, who imagine the East India Company to be
an old woman, are a type of those sagacious Tartars, who, as
Rubruquis assures us, supposed that the pope was an old man
whose beard had been blanched by five hundred winters.
On the 31st of October, they turned their horses’ heads towards
the south, and proceeded for eight days through a desert, where
they beheld large droves of wild asses, which, like those seen by the
Ten Thousand in Mesopotamia, were far too swift for the fleetest
steeds. During the seventh day, they perceived on their right the
glittering peaks of the Caucasus towering above the clouds, and
arrived on the morrow at Kenkat, a Mohammedan town, where they
tasted of wine, and that delicious liquor which the orientals extract
from rice. At a city which Rubruquis calls Egaius, near Lake Baikal,
he found traces of the Persian language; and shortly afterward
entered the country of the Orrighers, an idolatrous, or at least a
pagan race, who worshipped with their faces towards the north,
while the east was at that period the Kableh, or praying-point of the
Christians.
Our traveller, though far from being intolerant for his age, had not
attained that pitch of humanity which teaches us to do to others as
we would they should do unto us; for upon entering a temple, which,
from his description, we discover to have been dedicated to Buddha,
and finding the priests engaged in their devotions, he irreverently
disturbed them by asking questions, and endeavouring to enter into
conversation with them. The Buddhists, consistently with the
mildness of their religion, rebuked this intrusion by the most
obstinate silence, or by continual repetitions of the words “Om, Om!
hactavi!” which, as he was afterward informed, signified, “Lord, Lord!
thou knowest it!” These priests, like the bonzes of China, Ava, and
Siam, shaved their heads, and wore flowing yellow garments,
probably to show their contempt for the Brahminical race, among
whom yellow is the badge of the most degraded castes. They
believed in one God, and, like their Hindoo forefathers, burned their
dead, and erected pyramids over their ashes.
Continuing their journey with their usual rapidity, they arrived on
the last day of the year at the court of Mangou, who was encamped
in a plain of immeasurable extent, and as level as the sea. Here,
notwithstanding the rigour of the cold, Rubruquis, conformably to the
rules of his order, went to court barefoot,—a piece of affectation for
which he afterward suffered severely. Three or four days’ experience
of the cold of Northern Tartary cured him of this folly, however; so
that by the 4th of January, 1254, when he was admitted to an
audience of Mangou, he was content to wear shoes like another
person.
On entering the imperial tent, heedless of time and place,
Rubruquis and his companion began to chant the hymn “A Solis
Ortu,” which, in all probability made the khan, who understood not
one word of what they said, and knew the meaning of none of their
ceremonies, regard them as madmen. However, on this point
nothing was said; only, before they advanced into the presence they
were carefully searched, lest they should have concealed knives or
daggers under their robes with which they might assassinate the
khan. Even their interpreter was compelled to leave his belt and
kharjar with the porter. Mare’s milk was placed on a low table near
the entrance, close to which they were desired to seat themselves,
upon a kind of long seat, or form, opposite the queen and her ladies.
The floor was covered with cloth of gold, and in the centre of the
apartment was a kind of open stove, in which a fire of thorns, and
other dry sticks, mingled with cow-dung, was burning. The khan,
clothed in a robe of shining fur, something resembling seal-skin, was
seated on a small couch. He was a man of about forty-five, of
middling stature, with a thick flat nose. His queen, a young and
beautiful woman, was seated near him, together with one of his
daughters by a former wife, a princess of marriageable age, and a
great number of young children.
The first question put to them by the khan was, what they would
drink; there being upon the table four species of beverage,—wine,
cerasine, or rice-wine, milk, and a sort of metheglin. They replied
that they were no great drinkers, but would readily taste of whatever
his majesty might please to command; upon which the khan directed
his cupbearer to place cerasine before them. The Turcoman
interpreter, who was a man of very different mettle, and perhaps
thought it a sin to permit the khan’s wine to lie idle, had meanwhile
conceived a violent affection for the cupbearer, and had so
frequently put his services in requisition, that whether he was in the
imperial tent or in a Frank tavern was to him a matter of some doubt.
Mangou himself had pledged his Christian guests somewhat too
freely; and in order to allow his brain leisure to adjust itself, and at
the same time to excite the wonder of the strangers by his skill in
falconry, commanded various kinds of birds of prey to be brought,
each of which he placed successively upon his hand, and
considered with that steady sagacity which men a little touched with
wine are fond of exhibiting.
Having assiduously regarded the birds long enough to evince his
imperial contempt of politeness, Mangou desired the ambassadors
to speak. Rubruquis obeyed, and delivered an harangue of some
length, which, considering the muddy state of the interpreter’s brain
and the extremely analogous condition of the khan’s, may very
safely be supposed to have been dispersed, like the rejected prayers
of the Homeric heroes, in empty air. In reply, as he wittily observes,
Mangou made a speech, from which, as it was translated to him, the
ambassador could infer nothing except that the interpreter was
extremely drunk, and the emperor very little better. In spite of this
cloudy medium, however, he imagined he could perceive that
Mangou intended to express some displeasure at their having in the
first instance repaired to the court of Sartak rather than to his; but
observing that the interpreter’s brain was totally hostile to the
passage of rational ideas, Rubruquis wisely concluded that silence
would be his best friend on the occasion, and he accordingly
addressed himself to that moody and mysterious power, and shortly
afterward received permission to retire.
The ostensible object of Rubruquis was to obtain permission to
remain in Mongolia for the purpose of preaching the Gospel; but
whether this was merely a feint, or that the appearance of the
country and people had cooled his zeal, it is certain that he did not
urge the point very vehemently. However, the khan was easily
prevailed upon to allow him to prolong his stay till the melting of the
snows and the warm breezes of spring should render travelling more
agreeable. In the mean while our ambassador employed himself in
acquiring some knowledge of the people and the country; but the
language, without which such knowledge must ever be superficial,
he totally neglected.
About Easter the khan, with his family and smaller tents or
pavilions, quitted the camp, and proceeded towards Karakorum,
which might be termed his capital, for the purpose of examining a
marvellous piece of jewelry in form of a tree, the production of a
French goldsmith. This curious piece of mechanism was set up in
the banqueting-hall of his palace, and from its branches, as from
some miraculous fountain, four kinds of wines and other delicious
cordials, gushed forth for the use of the guests. Rubruquis and his
companions followed in the emperor’s train, traversing a
mountainous and steril district, where tempests, bearing snow and
intolerable cold upon their wings, swept and roared around them as
they passed, piercing through their sheep-skins and other coverings
to their very bones.
At Karakorum, a small city, which Rubruquis compares to the town
of St. Denis, near Paris, our ambassador-missionary maintained a
public disputation with certain pagan priests, in the presence of three
of the khan’s secretaries, of whom the first was a Christian, the
second a Mohammedan, and the third a Buddhist. The conduct of
the khan was distinguished by the most perfect toleration, as he
commanded under pain of death that none of the disputants should
slander, traduce, or abuse his adversaries, or endeavour by rumours
or insinuations to excite popular indignation against them; an act of
mildness from which Rubruquis, with the illiberality of a monk,
inferred that Mangou was totally indifferent to all religion. His object,
however, seems to have been to discover the truth; but from the
disputes of men who argued with each other through interpreters
wholly ignorant of the subject, and none of whom could clearly
comprehend the doctrines he impugned, no great instruction was to
be derived. Accordingly, the dispute ended, as all such disputes
must, in smoke; and each disputant retired from the field more fully
persuaded than ever of the invulnerable force of his own system.
At length, perceiving that nothing was to be effected, and having,
indeed, no very definite object to effect, excepting the conversion of
the khan, which to a man who could not even converse with him
upon the most ordinary topic, seemed difficult, Rubruquis took his
leave of the Mongol court, and leaving his companion at Karakorum,
turned his face towards the west. Returning by an easier or more
direct route, he reached the camp of Batou in two months. From
thence he proceeded to the city of Sarai on the Volga, and
descending along the course of that river, entered Danghistan,
crossed the Caucasus, and pursued his journey through Georgia,
Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Syria.
Here he discovered that, taught by misfortune or yielding to the
force of circumstances, the French king had relinquished, at least for
the present, his mad project of recovering Palestine. He was
therefore desirous of proceeding to Europe, for the purpose of
rendering this prince an account of his mission; but this being
contrary to the wishes of his superiors, who had assigned him the
convent of Acra for his retreat, he contented himself with drawing up
an account of his travels, which was forwarded, by the first
opportunity that occurred, to St. Louis in France. Rubruquis then
retired to his convent, in the gloom of whose cloisters he
thenceforward concealed himself from the eyes of mankind. It has
been ascertained, however, that he was still living in 1293, though
the exact date of his death is unknown.
The work of Rubruquis was originally written in Latin, from which
language a portion of it was translated into English and published by
Hackluyt. Shortly afterward Purchas published a new version of the
whole work in his collection. From this version Bergeron made his
translation into French, with the aid of a Latin manuscript, which
Vander Aa and the “Biographie Universelle” have multiplied into two.
In all or any of these forms, the work may still be read with great
pleasure and advantage by the diligent student of the opinions and
manners of mankind.
MARCO POLO.
Born 1250.—Died 1324.