0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views8 pages

Faa Ad 2023-15-05

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

[Federal Register, Volume 88 Number 153 (Thursday, August 10, 2023)]

[Rules and Regulations]


[Pages 54223-54225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17197]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA–2023–1650; Project Identifier AD–2023–00795–T; Amendment


39–22517; AD 2023–15–05]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:
Final rule; request for comments.

SUMMARY:
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737
airplanes equipped with CFM International, S.A. (CFM) Model LEAP–1B series turbofan engines.
This AD was prompted by a report indicating that use of engine anti-ice (EAI) in dry air for more
than five minutes during certain environmental and operational conditions can cause overheating
of the engine inlet inner barrel beyond the material design limit, resulting in failure of the engine
inlet inner barrel and severe engine inlet cowl damage. This AD requires revising the existing
airplane flight manual (AFM) to limit the use of EAI in certain conditions and revising the
operator's existing minimum equipment list to prohibit dispatch under a certain item. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES:
This AD is effective August 25, 2023.

The FAA must receive comments on this AD by September 25, 2023.

ADDRESSES:
You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA–2023–1650; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:


James Laubaugh, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone: 206–231–3622; email: james.laubaugh@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this final rule. Send your
comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES . Include Docket No. FAA–2023–1650 and
Project Identifier AD–2023–00795–T at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this final rule because of those comments.

Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and
other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without
change, to regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also
post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this final rule.

Confidential Business Information


CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private
by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is
relevant or responsive to this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as “PROPIN.” The
FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to James
Laubaugh, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone:
206–231–3622; email: james.laubaugh@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA receives that is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background
The FAA has received a report in June 2023 indicating that flight testing and analysis revealed that
the use of EAI in dry air for more than five minutes during certain combinations of altitude, total
air temperature, and N1 settings can result in engine inlet cowl temperatures exceeding design
limits when not in visible moisture. Excessive heat buildup can cause overheat of the engine inlet
inner barrel beyond the material design limit, resulting in failure of the engine inlet inner barrel
and severe engine inlet cowl damage. There have been no reports of in-service failures of the engine
inlet inner barrel to date.

This condition as previously described, if not addressed, could result in departure of the inlet and
potential fan cowl failure and departure from the airplane. The departure of the inlet may cause
fuselage and/or window damage, potentially resulting in decompression and hazard to window-
seated passengers aft of the wing and/or impact damage to the wing, flight control surfaces, and/or
empennage, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. Inlet loss also causes significantly
increased aerodynamic drag and asymmetric lift due to wing blanking, which risks fuel exhaustion
on certain flights, resulting in a forced off-airport landing and injury to passengers. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

FAA's Determination
The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency has determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD Requirements
This AD requires revising the existing AFM to limit the use of engine anti-ice in certain conditions.
This AD also requires revising the operator's existing minimum equipment list (MEL) to prohibit
dispatch under Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) Item 30–21–01B (EAI valve locked
open). Further analysis of this item is necessary to determine whether continued use will cause
failure of the engine inlet inner barrel.

Compliance With AFM Revision


Section 91.9 prohibits any person from operating a civil aircraft without complying with the
operating limitations specified in the AFM. FAA regulations also require operators to furnish pilots
with any changes to the AFM (14 CFR 121.137) and pilots in command to be familiar with the AFM
(14 CFR 91.505).

MMEL Revision
This AD refers to Item 30–21–01B (Engine (Cowl) Anti-Ice Valves), Boeing 737 MAX (B–737–
7/-8/-8200/-9) MMEL, Revision 5, dated June 3, 2022; this item is also included in an operator's
FAA-approved minimum equipment list (MEL). This AD prohibits dispatch or release of the
airplane under conditions currently allowed by that item in the MMEL. The FAA plans to revise the
MMEL to remove that item in a future revision; operators would then be required to also remove
that item from their existing FAA-approved MEL.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this AD to be an interim action. The manufacturer is currently developing a
modification that will address the unsafe condition identified in this AD. Once this modification is
developed, approved, and available, the FAA might consider additional rulemaking.

Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective Date


Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes
agencies to dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency, for “good
cause,” finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.” Under this section, an agency, upon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without
providing notice and seeking comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days, upon a finding of good cause.

An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD without providing an
opportunity for public comments prior to adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying
public justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because operating EAI in
dry air for more than five minutes during certain environmental and operational conditions can
cause overheating of the engine inlet inner barrel beyond the material design limit, resulting in
failure of the engine inlet inner barrel and severe engine inlet cowl damage. If not addressed, this
could result in departure of the inlet and potential fan cowl failure and departure from the airplane.
The departure of the inlet may cause fuselage and/or window damage, potentially resulting in
decompression and hazard to window-seated passengers aft of the wing and/or impact damage to
the wing, flight control surfaces, and/or empennage, which could result in loss of control of the
airplane. Further, inlet loss causes significantly increased aerodynamic drag and asymmetric lift
due to wing blanking, which risks fuel exhaustion on certain flights, resulting in a forced off-airport
landing and injury to passengers. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).

In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this
amendment effective in less than 30 days, for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forgo
notice and comment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act


The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good
cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA
has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis
is not required.

Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 402 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this AD:

Estimated Costs

Parts Cost per Cost on U.S.


Action Labor cost
cost product operators
Parts Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost
cost product operators
AFM/MEL 1 work-hour × $85 per $0 $85 $34,170
revision hour = $85

Authority for This Rulemaking


Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety.
Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart
III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is
likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, and

(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39


▪ Air transportation
▪ Aircraft
▪ Aviation safety
▪ Incorporation by reference
▪ Safety

The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR
part 39 as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES


1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive:
2023–15–05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39–22517; Docket No. FAA–2023–
1650; Project Identifier AD–2023–00795–T.

(a) Effective Date


This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 25, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs


None.

(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737 airplanes equipped with CFM International,
S.A. (CFM) Model LEAP–1B series turbofan engines, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30, Ice and Rain Protection; 71, Powerplant.

(e) Unsafe Condition


This AD was prompted by a report indicating that use of engine anti-ice (EAI) in dry air for more
than five minutes during certain environmental and operational conditions can cause overheating
of the engine inlet inner barrel beyond the material design limit, resulting in failure of the engine
inlet inner barrel and severe engine inlet cowl damage. The FAA is issuing this AD to address use of
EAI in certain environmental and operational conditions. The unsafe condition, if not addressed,
could result in departure of the inlet and potential fan cowl failure and departure from the airplane.
The departure of the inlet may cause fuselage and/or window damage, potentially resulting in
decompression and hazard to window-seated passengers aft of the wing and/or impact damage to
the wing, flight control surfaces, and/or empennage, which could result in loss of control of the
airplane. Inlet loss also causes significantly increased aerodynamic drag and asymmetric lift due to
wing blanking, which risks fuel exhaustion on certain flights, resulting in a forced off-airport
landing and injury to passengers.

(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.

(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision


Within 15 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the Limitations Section of the existing
AFM to include the information specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD. This may be done
by inserting a copy of figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD into the existing AFM.
(h) Minimum Equipment List (MEL) Revision
Within 15 days after the effective date of this AD or upon completion of the AFM revision required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, whichever occurs first: Revise the operator's existing FAA-approved
MEL to prohibit dispatch under the MEL item corresponding with Master Minimum Equipment
List (MMEL) Item 30–21–01B (Engine (Cowl) Anti-Ice Valves).

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)


(1) The Manager, AIR–520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair, modification,
or alteration required by this AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, AIR–520, Continued
Operational Safety Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair method,
modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and
the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(j) Related Information


For more information about this AD, contact James Laubaugh, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206–231–3622; email:
james.laubaugh@faa.gov.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference


None.

Issued on July 31, 2023.

Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2023–17197 Filed 8–7–23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

You might also like