Early Discharge Hospital at Home As Alternative To Routine Hospital Care For Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Early Discharge Hospital at Home As Alternative To Routine Hospital Care For Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Early Discharge Hospital at Home As Alternative To Routine Hospital Care For Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Abstract
Background The global population of adults aged 60 and above surpassed 1 billion in 2020, constituting 13.5%
of the global populace. Projections indicate a rise to 2.1 billion by 2050. While Hospital-at-Home (HaH) programs
have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional routine hospital care, showing initial benefits in metrics such
as lower mortality rates, reduced readmission rates, shorter treatment durations, and improved mental and functional
status among older individuals, the robustness and magnitude of these effects relative to conventional hospital set-
tings call for further validation through a comprehensive meta-analysis.
Methods A comprehensive literature search was executed during April–June 2023, across PubMed, MEDLINE,
Embase, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) to include both RCT
and non-RCT HaH studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager (version 5.4), with Forest plots
and I2 statistics employed to detect inter-study heterogeneity. For I2 > 50%, indicative of substantial heterogene-
ity among the included studies, we employed the random-effects model to account for the variability. For I2 ≤ 50%,
we used the fixed effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with different health conditions,
including cancer, acute medical conditions, chronic medical conditions, orthopedic issues, and medically complex
conditions.
Results Fifteen trials were included in this systematic review, including 7 RCTs and 8 non-RCTs. Outcome measures
include mortality, readmission rates, treatment duration, functional status (measured by the Barthel index), and men-
tal status (measured by MMSE). Results suggest that early discharge HaH is linked to decreased mortality, albeit sup-
ported by low-certainty evidence across 13 studies. It also shortens the length of treatment, corroborated by seven
trials. However, its impact on readmission rates and mental status remains inconclusive, supported by nine and two
trials respectively. Functional status, gauged by the Barthel index, indicated potential decline with early discharge
HaH, according to four trials. Subgroup analyses reveal similar trends.
†
Lulu Lin, Mengyuan Cheng, and Yawei Guo contributed equally to this work.
*Correspondence:
Weibin Cheng
[email protected]
Zhongzhi Xu
[email protected]
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom-
mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 2 of 15
Conclusions While early discharge HaH shows promise in specific metrics like mortality and treatment duration, its
utility is ambiguous in the contexts of readmission, mental status, and functional status, necessitating cautious inter-
pretation of findings.
Keywords Early discharge hospital at home, Home care services, Older people, Meta-analysis
if a consensus cannot be reached, a third author would Disagreements were resolved through consensus or
arbitrate. consultation with a third author if necessary.
data to enable a meaningful analysis. To this end, main Manager (Version 5.4), with Forest plots and I2 statis-
analyses were conducted by pooling RCT data and non- tics employed to detect inter-study heterogeneity. For
RCT data separately. For secondary analyses targeting I2 > 50%, indicative of substantial heterogeneity among
specific diseases in this study, we have not conducted the included studies, we employed the random-effects
separate analyses due to an insufficient number of studies model to account for the variability. For I2 ≤ 50%, we
within each category, which could compromise the statis- used the fixed effects model. Substantial heterogene-
tical power of the meta-analysis. ity was further examined, and subgroup analyses were
For datasets exhibiting homogeneity, a pooled meta- conducted for randomized controlled trials and specific
analysis was undertaken. This homogeneity was assessed patient subgroups.
according to the types of outcomes and their respec-
tive measurement time points across studies. Categori- Results
cal outcomes such as mortality were presented as risk Literature search and studies included
ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while con- A total of 9628 records were identified through our
tinuous outcomes were expressed as mean differences database search. Of these, 8750 were excluded because
(MDs) and 95% CIs. If various measurement techniques they are out of the scope of this analysis. This left 923
were employed, standardized MDs and 95% CIs were records for full-text assessment, from which 892 were
used. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review excluded for various reasons, including incorrect setting,
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 5 of 15
inappropriate intervention, and unavailability of full text. and non-RCTs (I2 = 72%) suggests variability in the study
Consequently, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of outcomes, underscoring the need for cautious interpreta-
these, 15 focused solely on “admission avoidance HaH.” tion (Fig. 5).
The remaining 15 studies that highlighted “early dis-
charge HaH” were included in this review. Figure 1 dem- Length of treatment
onstrates the selection flow. The forest plot for length of treatment shows that in
Fifteen trials with a cumulative sample size of 4,190 RCTs, the HaH group exhibits no significant difference
patients were incorporated into this study. The trials compared to routine care, with a mean difference of 0.02
involved patients with various health conditions, includ- (95% CI: − 0.98 to 1.03) and low heterogeneity (I2 = 8%).
ing cancer [13], acute medical conditions [5, 14–17], In contrast, non-RCTs demonstrate a significant reduc-
chronic medical conditions [4, 18, 19], orthopedic issues tion in treatment duration for HaH with a mean dif-
[18, 20–23], and medically complex conditions [18, 24, ference of − 1.66 (95% CI: − 3.18 to − 0.14) but with
25]. Of the 15 studies, 10 were trials related to early dis- substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 90%) (Fig. 6).
charge HaH [4, 14, 15, 19–25]. Meanwhile, five trials
studied HaH interventions that incorporated both early Functional status — Barthel index at the end up
discharge and admission avoidance [15, 17, 18, 21, 24]. Figure 7 indicates a notable reduction in treatment
Seven studies employed a randomized controlled trial length with HaH when compared to standard hospi-
design, one used a prospective quasi-experiment [5], one tal care, as shown by a mean difference of − 1.82 (95%
was a prospective, non-randomized real-world cohort CI: − 2.55, − 1.09) with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%)
comparison [13], one was a retrospective study [22], and in non-RCTs. A meta-analysis for RCTs on this outcome
one was a quasi-experimental longitudinal study [21]. was not performed due to the presence of only a single
The characteristics of the included studies are shown in study.
Additional file 1: Table S2. Meta-analysis related to early
discharge HaH program in the past 20 years is shown in Mental status — MMSE
Additional file 1: Table S3. For the assessment of mental status using MMSE, our
analysis considered one randomized controlled trial
Quality of included studies (RCT) [14] and one retrospective study [22]. Due to the
The risk of bias for RCT and non-RCT studies is shown presence of only one study in each category, we are not
in Figs. 2 and 3. Results demonstrate that, although cer- able to pool the results. The findings from both the ret-
tain domains within some studies raised “some concerns,” rospective study and the RCT indicated no significant
the collective evaluation of these studies generally indi- difference in MMSE scores between the case group and
cates a low risk of bias. the control group. Specifically, the retrospective study
reported a mean difference of − 1.24 (95% CI: − 3.30 to
Main analysis 0.82, N = 235; P = 0.24), and the RCT showed a mean dif-
Mortality ference of − 2.59 (95% CI: − 5.45 to 0.27, N = 70; P = 0.08).
The forest plot analysis for mortality outcomes compar-
ing early discharge HaH programs to routine hospital Subgroup analyses based on disease classification
care reveals a nuanced picture: RCTs show no significant Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with dif-
difference between HaH and hospital care, with an odds ferent medical conditions. Patients were classified into
ratio of 1.11 (95% CI: 0.75, 1.65) and minimal heteroge- five groups: acute medical conditions [5, 14–17], chronic
neity (I2 = 0%). Non-RCTs, however, indicate a significant medical conditions [4, 18, 19], orthopedic conditions [18,
mortality reduction in the HaH group (OR = 0.43; 95% 20–23], cancer [13], and medically complex conditions
CI: 0.26, 0.70), albeit with slightly more heterogeneity [18, 24, 25].
(I2 = 4%) (Fig. 4).
Mortality
Readmission Figure 8 reported the impact of early discharge HaH pro-
The forest plot comparing early discharge HaH to routine grams on mortality across various medical conditions.
hospital care shows no significant difference in readmis- Cumulatively, the data indicates a significant 25% reduc-
sion rates across both RCTs with an odds ratio of 0.97 tion in mortality risk for HaH participants (RR = 0.75,
(95% CI: 0.51, 1.82) and non-RCTs with an OR of 0.75 P = 1.00). Upon dissection by condition, both acute and
(95% CI: 0.35, 1.56), and this pattern holds in the com- chronic medical cases, as well as orthopedic and complex
bined analysis (OR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.40). However, the medical conditions, showed favorable trends towards
high heterogeneity observed within both RCTs (I2 = 71%) HaH programs, even if individual disease categorizations
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 6 of 15
Fig. 4 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: mortality
Fig. 5 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: readmission
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 9 of 15
Fig. 6 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: length of treatment
Fig. 7 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: functional status — Barthel index at the end up
did not always attain statistical significance. Notably, the while reflecting a slight reduction in readmission risk,
relatively low heterogeneity among acute and chronic also lacked statistical significance. Intriguingly, ortho-
conditions (I2 = 20% and I2 = 0%, respectively) suggests pedic cases displayed a notably higher readmission risk
consistent outcomes across these trials. The forest plot (RR = 3.14), though this observation was based on lim-
further reinforces these findings, with the majority of ited data and requires further substantiation. Medical
individual study outcomes leaning towards the early dis- complex conditions and cancer demonstrated neutral
charge HaH advantage and the aggregate result repre- to increased risk, yet again without achieving statisti-
sented by the diamond, solidly positioned on the “early cal significance. An overarching observation is the pro-
discharge HaH” side, underscoring the potential benefits nounced heterogeneity in some disease categories, such
of HaH in reducing mortality. as chronic medical problems (I2 = 68%), underscoring the
importance of interpreting these results with caution.
Readmission The forest plot bolsters these conclusions, with a mix of
Figure 9 illuminated the impact of early discharge HaH study outcomes on both sides of the neutrality line and
programs on readmission rates across diverse medical the collective result, embodied by the diamond, tending
conditions. Overall, the combined data reveals a marginal slightly towards the “routine hospital” side. This suggests
increase in readmission risk for HaH programs, but the that while HaH may offer several advantages, it is crucial
effect is statistically insignificant (RR = 1.04, P = 0.26). to consider patient-specific factors and disease categories
When segregating by disease type, acute medical cases when assessing its implications for readmission.
depict an almost neutral effect, with a pooled risk ratio
near unity (RR = 1.00). Chronic medical problems,
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 10 of 15
Fig. 8 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: subgroup analysis based on disease classification — mortality
Fig. 9 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: subgroup analysis based on disease classification — readmission
acute medical problems and orthopedic conditions. For a reduction in Barthel index scores, the magnitude and
those with acute medical problems, HaH intervention robustness of this impact appear to be condition-specific.
suggests a significant reduction in Barthel index scores Collectively, these findings emphasize the potential ben-
with a standard mean difference of − 0.42 (95% CI: − 0.57 efits of HaH, particularly for patients with acute medical
to − 0.27), showcasing its potential efficacy. This result is problems, but warrant cautious interpretation in the con-
statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.00001. text of orthopedic issues.
However, in orthopedic conditions, the results are less
definitive. Although there is a trend towards a decrease Discussion
in the Barthel index scores within the HaH group Fifteen trials were incorporated into this systematic
(MDs = − 0.11), the confidence interval slightly spans the review examining early discharge HaH for older people.
line of neutrality, indicating potential non-significance. Our investigation encompassed a comprehensive explo-
This subgroup also displays moderate heterogeneity ration of the efficacy of early hospital discharge to home
(I2 = 69%), hinting at diverse outcomes across the incor- care across several key domains: mortality, readmis-
porated studies. In totality, while HaH seems to influence sion rates, duration of treatment, functional status (as
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 12 of 15
Fig. 10 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: subgroup analysis based on disease classification — length of treatment
Fig. 11 Early discharge hospital at home versus routine hospital care: subgroup analysis based on disease classification — Barthel index at the end
up
quantified by the Barthel index), and cognitive health (as forest map, the diamonds tended to be on the “early dis-
assessed by the MMSE). charge HaH” side, emphasizing the role of early discharge
Our analysis suggests that early discharge HaH cor- HaH in mortality, readmission rate, length of treatment
relates with a decrease in mortality rates, a conclusion and Barthel index. Our subgroup analysis based on dis-
drawn from 6 of the non-RCTs. In contrast, the impact ease classifications—encompassing acute medical prob-
of early discharge HaH on readmission rates appears lems, chronic conditions, orthopedic issues, cancer, and
negligible, a conclusion supported by four non-RCTs medically complex conditions—revealed similar trends
and five RCTs. The influence of early discharge HaH when compared with the main analysis.
on cognitive health, based on MMSE scores, is simi- In our analysis, the effectiveness for the same meas-
larly inconsequential, as demonstrated by one RCT and ures—such as mortality, length of treatment, and the Bar-
one non-RCT. Moreover, early discharge HaH might thel index—between RCTs and non-RCTs is not always
be linked to a decline in functional status, as gauged by identical. This variance likely stems from the inherent
the Barthel index, based on evidence from one RCT and differences in the design and execution of these two
three non-RCTs. After analyzing the data of the fifteen types of studies. RCTs, with their higher design rigor and
trials included, regardless of whether there was a statis- controlled environments, minimize selection biases and
tically significant difference between the early discharge provide stronger evidence of causality, while non-RCTs,
HaH group and the routine hospital care group from the reflecting broader and more diverse populations, may
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 13 of 15
offer findings that are more generalizable but subject to to increase with population aging, urbanization, and
inherent biases and variability. The observed discrepancy globalization of risk factors [32, 33]. Implementing HaH
of effectiveness for the same measures between RCTs in these settings may alleviate some of these challenges
HaH and non-RCTs HaH highlights the importance of by providing essential healthcare services directly to
considering the real-world scenario in understanding the homes of older adults. This is particularly beneficial
reported intervention effectiveness. in geographical locations where distance and limited
The HaH model is distinguished by their more holistic transportation options make it arduous for individuals
approach compared to traditional hospital care, particu- to access healthcare facilities. HaH leverages telehealth
larly for older adults. Its capacity to prevent the devel- technologies and portable medical equipment, making
opment of geriatric syndromes is achieved through the it a scalable solution that can extend the reach of quality
comprehensive method of care that addresses not only healthcare to remote and underserved communities [34,
the medical but also the physical, emotional, and social 35]. While the effectiveness of HaH on specific clinical
needs of patients, thereby enhancing their overall well- outcomes may remain under debate, these broader socio-
being and reducing mortality risks. medical benefits highlight the importance of its contin-
Furthermore, the decline in functional status observed ued development and implementation. A comprehensive
in some patients underscores the indispensability of assessment of HaH programs should thus go beyond
incorporating a multidisciplinary team into the HaH traditional clinical metrics to include factors like patient
model. Specifically, the integration of physiotherapists safety, accessibility, and equity, especially in the changing
and occupational therapists is crucial. These profession- landscape of global healthcare [33].
als can tailor rehabilitation and daily activity programs Meanwhile, in this study, our analysis of functional
to the individual needs of each patient, fostering not status is limited to the Barthel index after the end of the
only the maintenance but potentially the improvement trials, while ignoring the trend of changes in the Barthel
of functional status. Such an approach ensures that care index before and after the intervention treatment in both
is not merely reactive but preventive and rehabilitative, groups. Due to the different evaluation indicators used
addressing both the immediate and long-term health in different trials for the various states of patients before
needs of the older adults. and after hospitalization, the emphasis on measurement
While our meta-analysis indicated that the efficacy of indicators also varies. Some trials focus on measuring
Hospital-at-Home (HaH) programs is equivocal with the index changes before and after admission, while oth-
regard to readmission rates and certain cognitive and ers focus on measuring the Barthel index after discharge.
functional outcomes, the approach nevertheless offers These may reduce the accuracy of our assessment of the
several distinct advantages that warrant further explora- improvement in functional status between the early dis-
tion and development. One of the most salient advan- charge group and the routine hospital care group. More-
tages of HaH programs in the aftermath of the COVID-19 over, the overlap of evaluation indicators for cognitive
pandemic is the minimization of exposure to nosocomial health in different experiments is also relatively low. If
infections for vulnerable older adults [26–28]. Traditional different indicators can be standardized, the evaluation in
hospital settings, by their nature, expose patients to a the mental state dimension will be more comprehensive.
variety of pathogens, posing an increased risk of acquir-
ing secondary infections. This is especially critical for
older adults who are often immunocompromised and Conclusions
thus more susceptible to infections. Implementing HaH In summation, while early discharge HaH presents a
programs can thus provide a safer, more controlled envi- viable approach for diminishing mortality and treat-
ronment, reducing the likelihood of cross-infections. The ment duration, its efficacy remains ambiguous in relation
healthcare industry’s experience in the pandemic under- to readmission, as well as cognitive and functional out-
scores the urgency for such decentralized healthcare comes. Thus, a prudent interpretation of these findings is
models that can offer quality care while mitigating risks essential.
associated with hospital-based treatment [29–31]. Abbreviations
HaH programs could also play a pivotal role in bridg- CI Confidence intervals
COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ing healthcare disparities observed in rural areas and ED HaH Early discharge hospital at home
developing countries, which frequently face infrastruc- EQ-5D The 5-level EQ-5D version
tural constraints and shortages of healthcare profession- HaH Hospital at Home
MD Mean differences
als. The burden of chronic diseases such as heart disease, MeSH Medical Subject Headings
cancer, diabetes, and mental disorders is high in low- MMSE The Mini-Mental State Examination
income and middle-income countries and is expected Non-RCTs Non-randomized controlled trials
Lin et al. BMC Medicine (2024) 22:250 Page 14 of 15
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub-
lished maps and institutional affiliations.