1.

In your case, can college students really develop their leadership skills through a college
course? Why or why not?
Introduction: Developing leadership skills is essential for college students' personal and
professional growth. This essay explores whether college courses can truly help students improve
their leadership abilities. By looking at the advantages and limitations of these courses, we can
understand how effective they are.
College courses offer a structured environment for students to improve their leadership abilities.
Firstly, these courses provide theoretical frameworks and models that help students understand the
basics of leadership. Additionally, practical exercises and simulations give students valuable
hands-on experiences to develop their leadership skills. Working on group projects also helps
students learn teamwork and interpersonal skills, which are crucial for effective leadership.
However, relying solely on college courses for leadership development has some limitations.
Leadership is a complex skill set that requires real-world application. While courses can provide
valuable insights, they may not fully replicate the challenges faced in actual leadership roles.
Moreover, leadership isn't only learned through formal education; it also requires personal growth,
self-reflection, and learning from experiences.
In conclusion, college courses can significantly contribute to developing leadership skills for
college students. They offer theoretical knowledge, practical experiences, and collaborative
opportunities that aid in leadership growth. However, students should see these courses as part of a
broader journey. To become effective leaders, they need to supplement their learning with real-
world experiences, mentorship, and self-reflection. By embracing a holistic approach to leadership
development, college students can reach their full potential and become well-rounded leaders in
the future.

2. In your opinion, can a leader maintain a personal friendship with some members of his or
her work group or team without creating the perception of in-groups (those in his or her social
circle) and out-groups (those outside his or her social circle)?
Introduction: Maintaining personal friendships within a work group or team can be a tough
challenge for leaders. This essay explores if leaders can have friends on their team without causing
problems. We'll look at the good and bad sides of having work friendships.
Having work friends has its benefits. It builds trust, open communication, and a positive work
environment. Teamwork and collaboration improve because people feel more comfortable sharing
ideas and concerns. Friendships also create a sense of camaraderie and loyalty, motivating team
members to do their best.

But having work friends can also create issues. Some team members might feel left out because
the leader is close to certain individuals. This can lead to feelings of favoritism, reduced trust in
the leader, and problems within the team. It might even affect how well the team works together.
To handle this, leaders need to be fair and transparent. They must make sure their friendships don't
affect their decisions or how they treat the team. Treating everyone equally and communicating
openly is crucial. Addressing any concerns that arise is important.
Close : Maintaining work friendships without causing problems is a delicate balance for leaders.
While friendships can improve the team, leaders need to be mindful of the potential consequences.
Prioritizing fairness, transparency, and inclusivity helps manage friendships in a way that creates a
positive work environment and avoids issues. Finding the right balance allows leaders to have
friends and keep the team successful and united.

3. Do you agree that time is an important situational factor to consider in selecting a leadership
style for the situation? Explain.
Introduction : Choosing the right leadership style is crucial for effective leadership. This essay
explores the idea that time is an important factor to consider when deciding on the best leadership
style for a situation. By looking at how time and leadership are connected, we can understand how
timing affects leadership effectiveness.
Time plays a big role in leadership because different situations need different approaches. When
there's an urgent situation that requires quick action, an autocratic or directive leadership style may
be necessary to make decisions fast and get things done efficiently. On the other hand, when
there's enough time for discussion and teamwork, a participative or democratic leadership style
can empower team members and encourage creative problem-solving.
The stage of a project or initiative also affects the choice of leadership style. In the early stages,
when clear guidance is needed, a more directive or authoritative leadership style might be best. As
the project progresses and team members become more skilled and independent, a more hands-off
or laissez-faire leadership style can encourage innovation, ownership, and self-motivation.

Moreover, time can impact how adaptable and flexible leadership styles need to be. In fast-
changing environments or industries, leaders must be quick to adjust their style to match the
evolving demands. Being able to switch between different leadership styles based on the situation,
urgency, or external factors can improve leadership effectiveness.
Close : In conclusion, time is a critical factor to consider when choosing a leadership style. The
urgency of a situation, the project's stage, and the need for adaptability all make timing important
in leadership. Leaders must assess the timing of a situation to select the most suitable style that fits
their team's or organization's needs and goals. By understanding the significance of time, leaders
can make better decisions and be more effective in various situations. This leads to better
outcomes in different contexts.
4. What do you say to those who argue that tactics used by followers to get noticed by their
leader (such as impressions management, ingratiation, and self-promotion) are shameful and self-
serving and should be avoided?
Introduction: This essay discusses the strategies followers use to get attention from their leaders,
like impression management, ingratiation, and self-promotion. There are debates about whether
these tactics are ethical and genuine. Some argue they are manipulative and self-serving, while
others see their potential benefits.
Critics say these tactics can be insincere and harm relationships and trust in the organization. They
believe people should focus on competence and genuine contributions, not calculated behaviors
for personal gain.
On the other hand, proponents see positive sides to these tactics. They say impression
management can showcase skills effectively, and ingratiation can build positive relationships and
collaboration when done genuinely. Self-promotion can also highlight strengths and contributions,
increasing visibility within the organization, as long as it's balanced with humility.
The perception of these tactics depends on the context and motivations behind their use. Some use
them for personal gain, while others use them strategically for professional growth and to help the
organization.

The debate shows that gaining recognition from leaders can be complex for followers. While
critics see these tactics as shameful and self-serving, proponents see their potential benefits when
used ethically and genuinely. The key is finding a balance, where individuals can show their skills
without compromising authenticity and trust in the organization. Organizations should value
genuine achievements and encourage open communication to reduce the need for excessive
reliance on these tactics. It's essential for individuals to assess their motivations and the ethical
implications of their actions when considering these strategies for gaining recognition from
leaders.

5. Can someone have a successful career by aspiring to be an effective follower? Explain.

- Introduction : The definition for “success” is different to everyone. Some people believe that
being a leader who inspire for many young people is success. In my opinion ,. aspiring to be an
effective follower can lead to success in one's career.
- Body:
The effective follower is someone who is high on critical thinking and involvement . They have
the courage to take risks for the organization. Effective followers are not risk-averse nor do they
shy from conflict. They have the courage to initiate change and put themselves at risk or in
conflict with others, even their leaders, to serve the best interest of their organization. As such they
are often described as proactive. Effective followers tend to function very well in self-managed
teams. They are a manager’s best asset in that they complement the leader’s efforts and can be
relied upon to relieve the leader of many tasks. Rather than the conforming in passive role in
which followers have been cast, effective followers are described as courageous, responsible and
proactive
Besides, effective followers produce high-quality work, increase workplace productivity and
improve workplace morale. This can make them valuable members of a workplace. Therefore
employees having these qualities are highly welcomed by all organizations. Furthermore, effective
followers often turn into great leaders.
Moreover effective followers have a high self-efficacy. They are people’s beliefs in his or her
capabilities to produce at a certain level of performance.
Discussion:
With trait of effective followers skills they have and value they attribute inconvertibly to leader
and organization, someone who aspires to become an effective follower has a very high chance of
success in the career as these individuals are highly disciplined and also have the courage to take
responsibility for their actions.
Close:
In conclusion aspiring to be an effective follower can indeed pave the way for a successful career.
Being an effective follower not only enables personal growth and fulfillment but also positions
individuals for increased opportunities, career advancement, and professional success in a world
that values leadership, let us not forget the importance and value of effective followership in a
achieving organizational excellence.

6. Teams are often credited with making better decisions than individuals, yet they are also
criticized for groupthink. What are some strategies for creating effective teams that don’t fall
victim to the groupthink phenomenon?

7. What is the key to creating cross-functional teams in which team members put the good of
the team ahead of functional self-interest?
Introduction:
In the modern business world, cross-functional teams are essential for addressing complex
challenges and driving innovation. To ensure the success of these teams, it is crucial to prioritize
the collective good over individual self-interest. Drawing insights from leadership theory, this
essay explores the key factors in creating cross-functional teams that work together harmoniously
towards shared goals.
Body:
Firstly, a shared vision and common goals unite team members. When everyone understands and
supports these objectives, collaboration becomes more effective, leading to shared success.
Additionally, open and honest communication fosters trust among team members. Encouraging
active listening and feedback ensures that everyone's opinions are valued, motivating them to
contribute their best efforts.
Furthermore, a collaborative culture is vital. When team members feel included and appreciated,
they prioritize the team's success over personal gains. This creates a cohesive and motivated team
where diverse skills work together to solve complex problems. Lastly, clearly defining roles and
responsibilities minimizes conflicts and boosts task execution. When team members understand
their contributions to shared goals, they work together efficiently.
Close:
In conclusion, successful cross-functional teams prioritize the team's interests over individual
gains. Emphasizing team success over self-interest creates a motivated and high-performing team,
capable of overcoming challenges and excelling in today's competitive landscape. By fostering
teamwork and synergy, cross-functional teams become a driving force for innovation and overall
success.

8. Identify and describe any team you have been a member of, or know about otherwise, that
has a strong norm of teamwork that all members support.
Introduction:
Being part of a team that embraces a strong norm of teamwork is a fundamental experience that
fosters growth, productivity, and success. In this essay, we will discuss a team that I had the
opportunity to be a member of, which exemplified the essence of cohesive collaboration and
mutual support.
Body:
The team I was a part of was a marketing project group during my college years. Our team
consisted of five members, each bringing unique skills and perspectives to the table. From the
outset, our team leader emphasized the significance of teamwork and encouraged active
participation from all members.
A crucial aspect that promoted teamwork within our group was effective communication. We held
regular meetings where everyone was encouraged to express their ideas and opinions freely. This
open communication fostered a sense of trust and respect among team members, ensuring that no
one felt left out or unheard.
Furthermore, our team leader set clear goals and roles for each member, based on their strengths
and expertise. This not only enhanced individual performance but also ensured that we worked
cohesively as a unit. Each of us knew our responsibilities and was committed to fulfilling them
diligently.

Discussion:
The strong norm of teamwork in our group greatly impacted our performance and results. By
fostering a collaborative environment, we were able to leverage each other's strengths and
compensate for weaknesses. This not only increased our efficiency but also boosted team morale.
Additionally, the spirit of mutual support was evident when someone faced challenges or setbacks.
Instead of criticizing, we rallied behind our struggling teammate, offering assistance and
encouragement. This created a sense of camaraderie and reinforced our commitment to each
other's success
Close:
In conclusion, the team I was a member of during my college years serves as an excellent example
of a group with a strong norm of teamwork. By emphasizing open communication, defined roles,
and mutual support, we were able to work cohesively and achieve outstanding results. The insights
from the book on effective team leadership played a significant role in shaping our team
dynamics. Being part of such an experience has taught me the value of collaboration and has
equipped me with essential skills for success in future team endeavors.

9. What role did the team leader play in making this possible? What are some of the key
indicators of team dysfunction?
Introduction:
Effective teamwork is crucial for any organization's success. However, dysfunctional teams can
hinder progress and reduce productivity. This essay explores the role of a team leader in
overcoming dysfunction within a team and examine key indicators of team dysfunction
Body:
Team leaders play a pivotal role in fostering a healthy team environment. Firstly, they need to
establish clear goals and roles for each team member. According to Lussier and Achua, setting specific
and measurable objectives creates a shared purpose, reducing the chances of conflicts
arising from unclear expectations. Effective delegation of tasks ensures that everyone's strengths
are maximized, minimizing feelings of being undervalued.
Secondly, communication is crucial for successful teamwork. A team leader should encourage
open and honest communication, creating an atmosphere where team members feel comfortable
expressing their ideas and concerns. By fostering a culture of trust, the team leader can address
potential conflicts promptly and constructively.
Discussion:
Key indicators of team dysfunction can be identified through various behaviors. One of these
indicators is a lack of cohesion among team members. If team members are unwilling to
collaborate, trust one another, or share information, it can lead to misunderstandings and reduced
efficiency. Additionally, frequent conflicts or a failure to resolve disagreements indicate
dysfunction within the team.
Another key indicator is a lack of commitment and accountability. If team members do not take
responsibility for their actions or do not actively contribute to achieving team goals, it can hinder
the overall progress. A disengaged team can lead to missed deadlines and incomplete projects.
Close:
In conclusion, a proactive team leader, through clear goals, effective communication, and fostering
collaboration, drives the team towards success while addressing dysfunction promptly. This
ensures a cohesive and thriving team dynamic, leading to increased productivity and overall
organizational success.

10. Give examples of good and poor communications in organizations. State your plan for
improving your listening skills.

Introduction: Communication is a fundamental aspect of organizational dynamics, significantly

impacting its success. Effective communication fosters understanding, collaboration, and a
positive work environment, while poor communication can lead to conflicts and reduced
productivity. This essay explores examples of good and poor communication in organizations and
outlines a plan to enhance listening skills for better communication.
Body:
Good communication in organizations is about clear, straightforward messages and active
listening. For example, when a manager clearly explains the project goals and each team member's
role, it boosts teamwork and motivation. Open communication encourages creativity, like when
employees freely share ideas during brainstorming sessions. Active listening fosters trust and
cooperation; for instance, when a team member listens attentively to a colleague's concerns and
offers support.

In contrast, poor communication leads to confusion and misunderstandings. For example, when a
supervisor gives unclear instructions team members might not know what to prioritize, resulting in
delays and errors.Or Lacking of transparency creates mistrust; for example, when management
keeps employees uninformed about changes, it creates distrust, and rumors and anxiety may
spread. Additionally, Failure to listen attentively can make team members feel undervalued and
unheard like when team members' ideas are not properly considered, they feel unimportant and
may stop sharing their thoughts, affecting overall engagement.
Discussion:
To enhance communication skills, I plan to focus on improving my listening skills. This involves
being fully present during conversations, actively paying attention to the speaker's message, and
avoiding distractions. I will also practice empathy, trying to understand others' perspectives and
emotions to foster better connections. Additionally, I will encourage open feedback and create a
safe space for team members to express their thoughts without fear of judgment. By doing so, I
can strengthen communication within the organization and contribute to its success.
Close:
In conclusion, effective communication is essential for organizational success. By recognizing
examples of good and poor communication, we can learn valuable lessons on how to improve our
communication practices. By honing our listening skills and promoting open dialogue, we can
create a more cohesive and productive work environment, leading to overall growth and success
for the organization.
11. How would you assess communications in organizations? (giáo trình)
Introduction:
In my point of view, evaluating communications in organizations is crucial to understand how well
they share information internally. By assessing communication processes, we can find strengths,
weaknesses, and areas to improve, leading to better productivity. This essay explores the concept
of assessing communications in organizations and its significance for achieving success.
Body:
From my perspective, clarity and consistency of messaging are vital for communication
assessment. When organizations communicate clearly and consistently, it helps team members
understand and align better. As an individual within the organization, I've seen how clear
communication keeps us on the same page, making collaboration more efficient.
Considering communication channels is also essential. Different methods suit specific information
and audiences. For instance, informal chats work well for quick team updates, while official
emails are better for company-wide announcements
Moreover, feedback and open dialogue matter for communication assessment. As an active team
participant, I believe regular feedback sessions and open dialogue gauge employee engagement.
When individuals feel valued and heard, it positively impacts their commitment.
Discussion:
In my opinion, using communication assessment tools like surveys and feedback sessions helps
collect valuable data for informed decisions. Seeking input from employees helps identify areas
needing improvement. Encouraging open communication lets employees share thoughts without
fear of consequences, fostering transparency and productivity.
Close:
To conclude, from my perspective, assessing communications in organizations is fundamental for
effective internal communication. Considering clarity, consistency, channels, and feedback can
create a more cohesive and productive work environment. As an individual invested in the
organization's success, I believe emphasizing communication assessment will lead to better
outcomes.
12. Give examples of good and poor communications in organizations. State your plan for
improving your listening skills
13. Should leadership be the manager’s job, or should leadership be a shared process?
14. Are you interested in sharing leadership, or do you prefer to be a follower?
15. As a leader, how will you motivate the alienated follower?
Introduction :
As a leader, my primary goal is to motivate and inspire every member of the team,including those
who feel alienated or disconnected. Addressing the needs of alienated followers is essential to
ensure a cohesive and productive work environment. In this essay, I will outline my approach to
motivating alienated followers using basic principles that can foster inclusivity and positive team
dynamics
Body:
To begin with, I firmly believe in the power of empathy and understanding. By actively listening
to the concerns and perspectives of alienated followers, I can gain insight into their feelings. This
allows me to build trust and a sense of belonging within the team.
Moving forward, effective communication is a basic pillar of my leadership style. I will ensure
that team members are well-informed about the organization's vision, goals, and strategies.
Keeping communication channels open will help create an inclusive environment where everyone
feels valued and heard.
Furthermore, recognizing that each individual is unique, I will provide personalized support to
alienated followers. Understanding their strengths and interests will enable me to assign tasks that
align with their abilities. This approach boosts their confidence and enthusiasm, making them
more inclined to contribute actively.
Furthermore, recognizing that each individual is unique, I will provide personalized support to
alienated followers. Understanding their strengths and interests will enable me to assign tasks that
align with their abilities. This approach boosts their confidence and enthusiasm, making them
more inclined to contribute actively.
Discussion:
My approach as a leader emphasizes basic principles such as adaptability and emotional
intelligence to motivate alienated followers effectively. By understanding their feelings and
concerns, providing personalized support and recognition, I aim to create a more engaged and
committed team
Close:
In conclusion, my commitment as a leader is to empower and inspire all followers, ensuring the
team's success and growth together. Utilizing empathy, open communication, personalized
support, and recognition, I hope to motivate and uplift even the most alienated of followers,
creating a thriving and harmonious team.
Vàng là k vào, xanh lá chắc chắn vào, phải paraphrase

Cấu trúc
Question 1: (3 pt)
Introduction :
Body:
Discuss : 1pt
Conclusion :
Question 2: 5pt
Question 3: 2 pt