Maco 201609363
Maco 201609363
Maco 201609363
DOI: 10.1002/maco.201609363
| Accepted: 21 August 2017
ARTICLE
KEYWORDS
epoxy resin, glass fiber, microemulsion polymerization, nano zinc oxide, polyaniline
Materials and Corrosion. 2017;1–9. www.matcorr.com © 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim | 1
2
| ROUHOLLAHI AND BARZEGAR KHALEGHI
matrix has proven that conductive polymers can constitute a work inside a composite coating where the intrinsically
viable option when it comes to the enhancement of the conductive polymer (ICP) is distributed inside a non-
characteristics of coatings. Among these polymers, polyani- conducting matrix. Pure ICP coatings will eventually fail
line (PANI) has received more attention owing to its excellent under practical conditions. However, not all of the
physical and chemical stability, relatively inexpensive composite coatings may succeed to achieve sufficient
synthesis, and nontoxicity. PANI and PANI composites can corrosion protection performance under experimental
effectively protect metal substrates under special conditions situations. In some cases, it was reported that PANI can
through different protection mechanisms such as reversible act as an oxidizing agent that is not able to protect the
redox reaction whereby forming a passive oxide layer, release metal but just increases the corrosion currents. In other
of inhibitor dopants and barrier effect.[12–18] Bulk polymeri- cases, despite initial protection, as soon as the conduct-
zation of PANI usually results in a product which is insoluble ing polymer failed to provide active protection, fast
in usual organic solvents; this severely limits the product's and total reduction of the whole ICP film lead to total
potential application due to reduced processability.[19] failure. These reports show how close positive and
According to the existing literature, one way of overcoming negative effects can be when ICPs are utilized as
this problem is to use emulsion/microemulsion polymeriza- coatings.[38–41]
tion in the presence of suitable surface active agents. During In the present study, an anticorrosive composite was
emulsion polymerization, acting as dopants, surfactants prepared using PANI doped with both phosphoric acid
drastically improve PANI solubility in organic solvents.[20] (PA) and dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA), via
Emulsion polymerization is usually performed in an acidic emulsion polymerization in the presence of zinc oxide
medium containing strong inorganic or weak organic acids nanoparticles, so as to enhance the corrosion protection
which serve as dopants and affect PANI properties. As performance of the coating. Milled E-glass fibers were
mentioned in the literature, acids such as H3PO4 enhance the introduced into the reaction vessel to form a fiber-
corrosion protection properties of PANI via forming a reinforced coating with superior physical properties
phosphate-metal complex on metal surface.[21] Recently, (Table 1). Finally, the composite was mixed with epoxy
conductive polymer composites containing metals and metal resin (serving as an adhesive matrix) before being applied
oxides have drawn much attention owing to the wide range on carbon steel specimens.
of their potential applications.[22] Hybrid composites
such as PANI/TiO2,[23] PPY/titanium dioxide,[24] PANI/
2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS
zinc oxide,[25] PANI/copper (II) oxide,[26] PANI/cadmium
(II) oxide,[27] PANI/bismuth (III) oxide,[28] and PANI/
2.1 | Reagents and materials
aluminum oxide[29] can be prepared following the procedures
described in the literature. Aniline (99%), DBSA (97%), phosphoric acid (85%), zinc
The performance of PANI can be improved by adding nitrate hexahydrate (98%), and sodium hydroxide (98%) were
metal oxides as they play a significant role in obtaining purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (USA). Ammonium persul-
PANI nanostructures with good surface morphological fate (APS) (98%) was procured from PanReac Química
properties and high conductivity. Zinc oxide is an n-type (Spain). Chloroform, epoxy resin (EP-400) and epoxy
semiconductor with a wide bond gap (3.37 eV) at room hardener (Ep-100-86) were obtained from local manufac-
temperature and good photocatalytic properties.[30] Nano turers (Amertat Co. and Pars Pamchal Chemical Co., both in
zinc oxide has garnered much interest due to its unique Iran). Double distilled water was used for preparing all
electrical properties, nontoxicity, and high stability. The solutions.
literature shows that zinc-polymer composites provide
highly effective anticorrosive coatings.[31–33] However,
2.2 | Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles
conductive polymer composites suffer from one major
drawback, which is their poor adhesion to various Zinc oxide nanoparticles were prepared adopting the
substrates; this limits their application severely. Because procedure explained in the literature. [42] In doing so,
of their mechanical stability and chemical inertness, epoxy proper amounts of zinc nitrate and sodium hydroxide
resins are widely used as an adhesive matrix for anticorro- were dissolved in deionized water to form a solution of
sive coatings.[34] In a large number of previously reported Zn2+ and OH−. While sodium hydroxide solution was
studies, epoxy-PANI composites were used to overcome the being vigorously stirred, the zinc nitrate solution was
drawbacks of PANI coatings by applying epoxy as a major added to it dropwise. After 2 h of reaction time, a white
part of the coating matrix phase or a top coat.[35–37] precipitate deposited, which was washed with ethanol
Based on prior reports, this must be kept in mind that and distilled water before being centrifuged. Finally, the
corrosion protection by conducting polymers will only paste-like zinc oxide was dried in oven at 80 °C for 12 h.
ROUHOLLAHI AND BARZEGAR KHALEGHI
| 3
TABLE 4 DC polarization curves parameters for coated carbon steel in 3.5% NaCl solution
Sample name ba (mV dec−1) bc (mV dec−1) ICorr (μA) ECorr (mV)
Neat epoxy 177.87 195.31 50.77 −882.99
PANI 64.22 155.41 39.14 −843.72
PANI/zinc oxide (0.5%)/GF (5%) 134.67 97.74 10.20 −753.25
PANI/zinc oxide (1%)/GF (5%) 143.99 81.95 6.19 −735.71
PANI/zinc oxide (2%)/GF (5%) 59.99 113.98 5.07 −723.76
ROUHOLLAHI AND BARZEGAR KHALEGHI
| 7
FIGURE 9 SEM images of bare steel (a), epoxy-coated steel (b), and PANI/ZnO (1%)/GF (5%) coated steel (c)
TABLE 5 The weight loss parameters of carbon steel samples during the immersion test in 3.5% NaCl for 50 days at 30 ± 2 °C
Initial weight Final weight (mg) after 50 days of Weight loss Weight loss
Sample name (mg) immersion in 3.5% NaCl solution (mg) (%)
Bare steel 3285.1 2181.7 1103.4 33.59
Neat epoxy-coated steel 3385.2 2604.4 780.8 23.06
PANI/ZnO (0.5%)/GF (5%) coated 3400.1 3303.2 96.9 2.85
steel
PANI/ZnO (1%)/GF (5%) coated steel 3401.3 3329.9 71.4 2.1
PANI/ZnO (2%)/GF (5%) coated steel 3404.8 3304.0 100.8 2.96
8
| ROUHOLLAHI AND BARZEGAR KHALEGHI
epoxy-coated sample did not provide much protection due to [10] L. T. Pedersen, presented at Marine Coating Conference,
its relative porosity in comparison with PANI/ZnO/GF- Hamburg, Germany, 24−25 September, 2008, pp. 25–48.
coated samples. Both SEM and weight loss study are in [11] U. Yilmazer, Compos. Sci. Technol. 1992, 44, 119.
[12] C. Jeyaprabha, S. Sathiyanarayanan, G. Venkatachiari, J.
correlation with this fact that addition of PANI/ZnO/GF
Electroanal. Chem. 2005, 583, 232.
nanocomposite to epoxy matrices can reduce coating porosity
[13] T. P. McAndrew, Trends Polym. Sci. 1997, 5, 7.
and provide barrier effect for steel substrate (Table 5). [14] P. J. Kinlen, V. Menon, Y. Ding, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146,
3690.
4 | CONCLUSIONS [15] S. Sathiyanarayanan, S. Muthkrishnan, G. Venkatachari, Electro-
chim. Acta 2006, 51, 6313.
[16] I. Šeděnková, M. Trchová, N. V. Blinova, J. Stejskal, Thin Solid
The present study was an investigation into the corrosion Films 2006, 515, 1640.
protection of carbon steel using the PANI/zinc oxide/GF [17] N. V. Blinova, J. Stejskal, M. Trchova, J. Prokes, Polymer 2006,
nanocomposite incorporated into an epoxy matrix. It was found 47, 42.
that adding GF to the coating, one can enhance mechanical [18] J. Prokes, J. Stejskal, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2004, 86, 95.
properties and improve coating elasticity, which leads to more [19] N. Bahrami Panah, M. Payehghadr, I. Danaee, H. Nourkojouri, M.
durable coatings. An inspection of the GF content of coatings Sharbatdaran, Iran Polym. J. 2012, 21, 747.
revealed that the coating containing 5 w/w% of GF produced [20] Y. Hana, T. Kusunose, T. Sekino, Synth. Met. 2009, 159, 123.
[21] J. E. P. da Silva, S. I. C. de Torresi, R. M. Torresi, Corros. Sci.
the best strain-stress results. Regarding corrosion protection
2005, 47, 811.
performance, the coating containing 1 w/w% of zinc oxide [22] A. L. Briseno, T. W. Holcombe, A. I. Boukai, E. C. Garnett, S. W.
nanoparticles performed better, as indicated by the shifting of Shelton, J. J. M. Fréchet, P. Yang, Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 334.
the corrosion potential toward noble potentials on DC [23] A. Dey, S. De, A. De, S. K. De, Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1277.
polarization plots. Briefly, it can be concluded that, PANI/ [24] D. Jiao, J. C. Bystryn, K. Murakoshi, R. Kogure, Y. Wada, S.
zinc oxide/GF nanocomposite in epoxy matrix can enhance the Yanagida, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 55, 113.
mechanical characteristics and corrosion protection perfor- [25] A. Olad, R. Nosrati, Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 68, 319.
mance of conductive PANI better than the addition of plain [26] M. Mizanur, R. Khana, Y. K. Weeb, W. A. Kamil Mahmood,
Synth. Met. 2012, 162, 1065.
PANI. Such a composite can prevent corrosion in cracks and
[27] S. Kondawar, R. Mahore, A. Dahegaonkar, S. Agrawal, Adv. Appl.
defects via forming a passive iron oxide layer and releasing Sci. Res. 2011, 2, 401.
phosphate ion. Furthermore, with porosity being reduced, [28] W. E. Mahmoud, A. A. Al-Ghamdia, Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011,
PANI/zinc oxide/GF nanocomposites can hinder corrosive 22, 877.
environment from diffusing into coating. [29] G. L. Teoh, K. Y. Liew, W. A. K. Mahmood, Mater. Lett. 2007, 61,
4947.
[30] T. Tuken, Prog. Org. Coat. 2006, 55, 60.
ORCID [31] E. Armelin, M. Marti, F. Liesa, J. I. Iribarren, C. Aleman, Prog.
Ahmad Rouhollahi http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-4011 Org. Coat. 2010, 69, 26.
[32] A. Kalendova, Prog. Org. Coat. 2003, 46, 324.
Mohammad Hamed Barzegar Khaleghi http://orcid.org/
[33] A. Moezzi, A. M. McDonagh, M. B. Cortie, Chem. Eng. J. 2012,
0000-0002-8894-3673 185, 1.
[34] E. Armelin, C. Aleman, J. I. Iribarren, Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 65,
88.
[35] A. Tale, O. Forsen, S. Ylasaari, Synth. Met. 1999, 102, 1394.
REFERENCES
[36] Y. Shao, H. Huang, T. Zhang, G. Meng, F. Wang, Corros. Sci.
[1] D. Ratna, Compos.: Part A 2008, 39, 462. 2009, 51, 2906.
[2] S. Jongsung, P. Cheolwoo, M. Do Young, Compos.: Part B Eng. [37] S. Radhakrishnan, N. Sonawane, C. R. Siju, Prog. Org. Coat. 2009,
2005, 36, 504. 64, 383.
[3] P. Joung-Man, S. Wae-Gyeong, Y. Dong-Jin, Compos. Sci. [38] M. Rohwerder, Int. J. Mater. Res. 2009, 10, 100.
Technol. 1999, 59, 355. [39] G. Williams, H. N. McMurray, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.
[4] S. Dong, R. Gauvin, Polym. Compos. 1993, 14, 414. 2005, 8, B42.
[5] S. Keusch, R. Haessler, Compos.: Part A 1999, 30, 997. [40] J. M. Gustavsson, P. C. Innis, J. He, G. G. Wallace, D. E. Tallman,
[6] W. Brostow, W. Chonkaew, K. P. Menard, T. Scharfd, Mater. Sci. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 1483.
Eng. A 2009, 507, 241. [41] M. Rohwerder, S. Isik-Uppenkamp, C. A. Amarnath, Electrochim.
[7] T. Kanie, K. Fujii, H. Arikawa, K. Inoue, Dent. Mater. 2000, 16, Acta 2011, 56, 1889.
150. [42] C. Wu, X. Qiao, J. Chen, H. Wang, F. Tan, S. Li, Mater. Lett. 2006,
[8] F. Chen, D. Tripathi, F. R. Jones, Compos. Sci. Technol. 1996, 56, 60, 1828.
609. [43] J. Stejska, Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 857.
[9] P. K. Vallittu, J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999, 81, 318. [44] E. M. Genies, C. J. Tsintavis, Electroanal. Chem. 1985, 195, 109.
ROUHOLLAHI AND BARZEGAR KHALEGHI
| 9
[45] S. H. Lee, D. H. Lee, K. Lee, C. W. Lee, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, [57] S. Sathiyanarayanan, S. Muthkrishnan, G. Venkatachari, Electro-
15, 1495. chim. Acta 2006, 6313, 6319.
[46] Y. Hana, T. Kusunose, T. Sekino, Synth. Met. 2009, 159, 123. [58] S. Sathiyanarayanan, S. Muthukrishnan, G. Venkatachari, Prog.
[47] Y. K. Han, S. G. Oh, S. I. Shin, W. D. Joung, S. C. Yi, C. G. Cho, Org. Coat. 2006, 5, 10.
Colloids Surf. B 2002, 24, 33. [59] S. Sathiyanarayanan, S. S. Azim, G. Venkatachari, Synth. Met.
[48] M. Oh, S. Kim, Electrochim. Acta 2012, 5, 196. 2007, 157, 751.
[49] Y. Hao, F. Liu, E. Han, Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 571. [60] M. Kendig, M. Hon, L. Warren, Prog. Org. Coat. 2003, 47,
[50] H. S. Abdulla, A. I. Abbo, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 183.
10666.
[51] M. Khanmohammadi, F. Mizani, M. Barzegar Khaleghi, A.
Bagheri Garmarudia, Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. 2013, 49, 661.
[52] A. Mostafaeia, A. Zolriasatein, Prog. Nat. Sci. 2012, 22, 273.
[53] F. M. Zhao, N. Takeda, Compos. Part A Appl. 2000, 31, 1203. How to cite this article: Rouhollahi A, Barzegar
[54] R. A. RanadeA, J. Ding, S. L. Wunder, G. R. Baran, Compos. Part Khaleghi MH. Epoxy-based PANI/zinc oxide/glass
A Appl. 2006, 37, 2017.
fiber nanocomposite coating for corrosion protection
[55] V. Cech, R. Prikry, R. Balkova, J. Vanek, A. Grycova, J. Adhes.
of carbon steel. Materials and Corrosion. 2017;1–9.
Sci. Technol. 2003, 17, 1299.
[56] X. Shi, T. Anh Nguyen, Z. Suo, Y. Liu, R. Avci, Surf. Coat. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201609363
Technol. 2009, 204, 237.