Cameroon's COVID-19 Pandemic Education Response and The Shift To Distance-Digital Learning, November 2021
Cameroon's COVID-19 Pandemic Education Response and The Shift To Distance-Digital Learning, November 2021
Cameroon's COVID-19 Pandemic Education Response and The Shift To Distance-Digital Learning, November 2021
“One child, one teacher, one book, one pen can change the world.”
www.sodei.org
Abstract
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in February/March 2020 and the
imminent measures to curb its spread brought education to a complete halt while
stakeholders figured out how to ensure education continuity in Cameroon.
Cameroon’s education response mirrored that of other sub-Saharan African
countries that have been generally considered to be unprepared for distance
learning solutions. While the world was already leaning towards digital learning
and virtual education to supplement traditional forms of learning, the COVID-19
pandemic revealed the need for structured and suitable systems of distance
learning facilitated by digital tools and technology.
The purpose of this study is to examine the preparedness for contingencies of this
nature, and sufficiency of the measures employed to ensure education continuity
by the Cameroon government and other education stakeholders in response to
the Covid-19 pandemic; the challenges to an effective and viable distance learning
alternative and what needs to be done to reinforce distance/digital learning
realistically in Cameroon. The study also aims to demonstrate the need for and
importance of a crucial and substantial digital learning policy, which would put in
place measures and conditions necessary for equitable and sustainable digital
access for pupils and students in Cameroon in line with goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda
for Sustainable Development.
About SODEI
Solidarity and Development Initiative (SODEI) is a UK registered charity working
to inspire, engage and empower children and young persons in Cameroon by
increasing their chances to succeed through education. We do this by promoting
equitable access to quality education through research and advocacy, skills
training and education support. We also create spaces and platforms to foster
participation in youth and community development activities.
Our vision is a society where children and young people have equitable access to
quality education and opportunities, where they can confidently participate as
agents of change and development while making positive contributions to
decision-making in their homes, communities and nation.
Table of Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................2
Background to the study .....................................................................4
Purpose of the research .......................................................................5
Scope of Research ...............................................................................6
State of research on the subject .........................................................6
Methodology ........................................................................................9
Cross Sectional Survey and Interviews .............................................9
Evidence Review ............................................................................. 10
Response Rates ................................................................................ 10
Limitations ......................................................................................... 10
Findings ................................................................................................ 11
1.How appropriate was the response of the government,
educational institutions, and other stake holders to guarantee
continuity in education or learning in response to the Covid-19
pandemic? ...................................................................................... 11
2.How far does the view differ between different stakeholders –
public and private, teachers and students? ................................. 16
3.What challenges were faced and what best practices can be
shared and implemented wider? .................................................. 21
Conclusion .......................................................................................... 28
References .......................................................................................... 30
Background to the study
The first cases of the COVID-19 virus infection in Cameroon were observed in
February/March of 2020 and by April of 2020 it had become imperative for
measures of public health and safety to be put in place to curb the infections and
protect persons. The imminent measures1 for this purpose, would bring education
to a complete halt while stakeholders figured out how to ensure education
continuity in these trying times. The nationwide paralysis of the education sector
caused by the pandemic meant that over 6 million learners in primary and
secondary schools were out of school. (UNSD, 2020)2 The start of the pandemic
in Cameroon met with multiple crises affecting the education sector in many parts
of the country. UNICEF and other humanitarian actors observed that the crisis in
the English-speaking regions had displaced over half a million people and deprived
700,000 children of schooling (SODEI Report, 2021)3.
4
UNESCO (2020), National Learning Platforms and tools. Retrieved from
https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/nationalresponses
5
https://www.businessincameroon.com/ict/2805-10362-cameroon-huawei-deploys-e-
learning-platform-learn-on-to-ensure-continuity-of-its-certification-programs
includes Jean Baptiste Essissima, referenced by Béché (2020), who designed and
launched an application called SchoolMobile a paid online revision platform for
secondary school students in Africa on March 27, 2020.6 The platform which runs
on mobile phones and computers already hosted more than 5000 students by April
20, 2020.
While the world was already leaning towards digital learning and virtual education
as a supplement for traditional forms of learning, the COVID-19 pandemic
revealed the need for structured and suitable systems of distance learning
facilitated by digital tools and technology. Cameroon’s distance learning response
comprising of institutional and individual initiatives, online and offline platforms
has been described as “a patchwork combination of institutional and individual
initiatives, learning management systems and information and communication
tools” (Béché, 2020, p. 762) Although the government’s immediate reaction in
setting up initiatives such as School on TV was initially praised , it received mixed
reactions by the conclusion of the first phase which focused specifically on
examination classes. Reactions from students, teachers, and education
stakeholders pointed to lack of preparedness and readiness by all stakeholders
including the government and private education providers as well as the students
themselves (Béché, 2020). Cameroon government’s education response mirrored
the response of other sub-Saharan African countries that have been generally
considered to be unprepared for distance learning solutions (Haji S., Moluayonge,
G. and Park, I., 2017). The approaches employed witnessed the shortfall of limited
and difficult accessibility characterized by slow internet connectivity, frequent
power failures, lack of sufficient radio and tv coverage, further exacerbated in
rural enclaves. This raises the question of preparedness for unforeseen situations
of such a magnitude as the COVID-19 pandemic and the global trend moving
towards virtual learning methods in addition to traditional learning methods.
This paper also aims to demonstrate the need for and importance of a crucial and
substantial digital learning policy, which would put in place measures and
conditions necessary for equitable and sustainable digital access for pupils and
students in Cameroon in line with goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Scope of Research
Whereas the Cameroon government was obligated to take a new approach to
ensure the right to education facing the COVID-19 pandemic like the rest of the
world, their response seemed to elicit mixed reactions and obviously pointed to
an opportunity for holistic improvement. The importance of digital access and
education was sorely highlighted in the advent of the pandemic, hence the
advocacy for new digital methods of learning to be included into the current
education policy.
The scope of this study is limited to examining the right to education and the right
to information as they relate to digital access specifically within the context of the
response of the Cameroon government to education before, during and after the
pandemic prospectively. In this light the study will examine the response proper,
general preparedness, actions by different stakeholders and the availability of
tools for digital access through the lens of education policy and available literature.
The study will adopt a top to bottom approach whereby reactions will be examined
from the wider perspective of the government down to the narrower scope of
communities and families.
Ultimately, this study is intended to be an important factor in building the case for
digital access as an independent human right, though it might be clearly linked to
the right to education and the right to information and freedom of expression.
Despite the efforts towards integrating ICT into education and enhancing digital
access for learning in Cameroon, there have been challenges which became
evident during the COVID-19 orchestrated school shut-down. The absence of a
clear vision and planned strategy for ICT integration in Education (Nsolly N. and
Charlotte N.), the lack of technological resources, knowledge and skills (Nsolly N.
and Charlotte N. 2016, Farinkia, N. and Tambi, A., 2018, Farinka, N. 2018, Njouny,
M. E., 2021), as well as attitudes and beliefs of teachers and parents (Haji S.,
Moluayonge, G. and Park, I., 2017, Mbakwa P. 2019, Farinkia, N. and Tambi, A.,
2018, Nsolly N. et al, 2016, Njouny, M. E., 2021) have been identified as some of
the major challenges. The focus of government and private sector initiatives has
been seen to be more theoretical than practical as a result of the lack of ICT
infrastructure (Nsolly N. and Charlotte N., 2016). Meanwhile it has also been
argued that in Cameroon, the “Physical Integration Approach” to technology in
education which involves the introduction of technological equipment for use by
students and teachers, outweighs the “Pedagogical Integration Approach” which
is a more habitual and sustained use of ICT in education, oriented towards change
in educational practices and the improvement of teaching and learning
experiences 7. (Kindzeka Nestor n.d.).8
7 IsaBelle, C. (2002) explains that the Pedagogical integration Approach is the appropriate,
habitual and regular use of ICT in education that produces a beneficial change in educational
practices and improves teaching and learning. While the Physical integration Approach is
understood as the introduction of technological equipment in educational institutions for use by
teachers and students.
8
Kindzeka Nestor. (n.d.) PLAN OF ACTION FOR DIGITAL EDUCATION IN CAMEROON
(PADEC). Information impact globe, available at https://www.ii-globe.com/plan-of-
action-for-digital-education-in-cameroon-padec/
Emmanuel Béché is of the opinion that the approaches adopted by the
Cameroonian government regarding education revealed that the Cameroonian
education system is plagued by disorganisation, educational inequalities and
exclusion – problems which affect learners’ daily lives on a personal level.
According to him, the challenge for Cameroon in times of confinement, was how
to ensure pedagogical continuity through new educational technologies without
exacerbating existing educational inequalities (Béché, 2020).
A survey carried out by Akaba A. James and Nteta Philip on the advancement of
e-learning in Cameroon during the pandemic9 revealed a series of highs and lows.
While most of the surveyed sample population decried shortcomings such as the
exorbitant cost of internet data, the inability of TV and radio distance learning
methods to properly engage students, poor accessibility, and the fact that the
pandemic took many institutions unaware among other things, some remained
hopeful that better methods could be employed to ease into digital learning as an
alternative.
The National Observatory of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights reported that
there was a violation of the right to education, in particular of children from the
most disadvantaged households in urban areas, villages and other refugee camps
due to the fact that the measures taken in response to COVID-19 to ensure the
continuity of the supervision of school children did not include facilities to facilitate
their inclusion and access.10 The report also asserted that solutions for distance
education via ICT and mass media did not include children from poor households
who are disconnected and do not have access to electrical energy.11
Though the response by Cameroon was not identical to that of similar countries
especially within sub-Saharan Africa, a lot of similarities could be observed which
pushed researchers to explore alternative approaches.
The Global Partnership agrees with the World Bank that the effect of COVID-19 on
education could be felt for decades to come. The impact transcends learning loss,
which is a short-term issue, to a more long-term issue of diminishing economic
9
Akaba. J. and Nteta. P. (2020). Covid-19 School Closure in Cameroon -How is the
Education Sector Advancing With E-Learning?
10
National Observatory of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2020). State of the
implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Cameroon during the COVID-
19 crisis
11
Ibid
opportunities.12 In this light, some necessary reforms will have to be made to
change education policies and make education relevant for the student.
Bernard et al. (2020) advance that education is one of the largest and most
consequential government activities in Africa, and policymakers and aid agencies
ignore it at the continent’s peril. Indeed, by continuing to support education during
the pandemic, governments can strengthen their countries’ immediate COVID-19
response and long-term recovery.13
Methodology
The evaluation employed a mixed methods approach to data collection: a cross-
sectional survey, stakeholder interviews, and evidence review. The target
population for the survey and interviews are students, parents and guardians of
students, and school staff in the Southwest region of Cameroon, specifically in
Buea and Limbe. Specifically, this study focuses on students in Forms 1-5, Lower
Sixth, and Upper Sixth.
12
https://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/covid-19-and-education-sub-saharan-africa-
5-actions-way-forward
13
Bernard et al., (June 4, 2020) Education is crucial to Africa’s Covid-19 Response OP-
ED Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/education-is-crucial-
to-africas-covid-19-response/
disseminated online and in person as a paper survey. Online invitations for these
surveys were shared through social media platforms (Facebook, LinkedIn, and
Instagram), with a specific focus on student groups on Facebook (GCE
preparations, for example). Paper surveys were disseminated and conducted in
person, with SODEI volunteers scheduling appointments with schools through
their admin staff, handing the surveys to students who provided their input and
returned it to the volunteer on site.
In addition to the survey and interviews, a small focus group discussion (FGD)
was conducted to obtain more in-depth information from students in Limbe. Nine
students from forms 1 to 3, 4 to 5 and Lower Sixth participated. The major
questions posed reflected the use of online learning and devices to bridge
technological gaps, access to the internet for learning, and a comparison of digital
education and computer learning in schools and after-school programs.
Evidence Review
Response Rates
In total, 814 students from Buea and Limbe, in Forms 2-5, Lower Sixth, and Upper
Sixth participated in this study. Of these students, 481 (59.09%) are female, 307
(37.71%) are male, and 26 (3.19%) preferred not to indicate their gender. 172
(21.13%) are in a government school, 256 (31.45%) in a mission school, and 386
(47.42%) in private school. Response rates from adult participants was
significantly lower with only 20 parents and guardians, and 39 school staff (24
teachers, 7 admin, 4 leadership, 3 IT, and 1 other) offering their feedback
Limitations
Limited response from parents, guardians and school staff will make any
comparison between their responses and that of the students limited in scope.
Additionally, responses by forms were closely linked to the type of school:
government school responses were predominantly from students in Form 3,
Mission for Forms 4 and 5, and Private for Forms 4-5 and Lower Sixth. The analysis
will focus on student responses based on the type of school but not on the
student’s age or form. Limited literature to consult for this research was another
general limitation.
Findings
This section aims to determine the preparedness and sufficiency of measures
employed by various stakeholders to ensure educational continuity during the
pandemic. The data collected is explained by means of three research questions
which scrutinize various aspects of these contingency measures.
Students were similarly split regarding their satisfaction with the quality of their
education during the pandemic. 31.63% of students indicated some level of
satisfaction with their education during this time frame and 44.90% had some
level of dissatisfaction (see Figure 1.A, below). The findings for parents and
guardians closely mirrored those of the students: 40.00% indicated some level of
satisfaction and 50.00% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. In the open-ended
response section of the survey, several students expressed that the ability to learn
should be encouraged, that it provided flexibility with their school curriculum, with
one stating that she “loves the flexibility it comes with, one can learn anywhere
and anything” and another stating that digital learning “is a gateway to future
technological advancement and should be a very useful tool nowadays.”
Figure 1.A: Student Perception of the Quality of Education during the Pandemic
Interviewed staff members and the student focus group also expressed concern
about the quality of education. All staff interviewed pointed to lack of access to
tools including hardware and internet as a major challenge to the advancement of
digital education in general and greatly affected the COVID- 19 education
response. While most staff stated that the schools (public and private) they have
worked for had computer labs, they pointed to major issues involved in the
operation of these labs including, insufficient computers, limited time allotted to
students, lack of well-trained ICT staff, etc. One teacher stated:
In most of the public schools I work for, students who study ICT have
access to the computer laboratories. Whereas students who don't
have anything to do with ICT wouldn't have access to the
computers... In addition, these computer laboratories, which are
strictly for ICT students, can only be accessible during computer
practical lessons which maybe once a week, for 90 minutes. They do
not have open access.
Most of the participants in the FGD didn’t have access to devices and the internet
in school. Some attested to having learnt more about computers and have more
access to devices and the internet through after-school computer programs. One
participant, a secondary school student stated that their school computer lab is
always closed for students.
School staff responded positively concerning how well their school supported
students during the pandemic but were divided about how supported they felt and
how they felt the government supported students. Nearly 54% of school staff
indicated that their school’s support of student education was very good or good,
with only 18% indicating that it was poor or very poor. School staff were less
positive about their own support during the pandemic, with only 29% saying they
felt supported, 37% somewhat, and 34% not supported. Due to the small sample
size of school staff, the percentages here are misleading. Looking strictly at the
number of respondents, teachers overwhelmingly indicated feeling somewhat or
not at all supported (only 4 out of 24 responding teachers stated yes to feeling
supported during the pandemic) while school leaders and admin tended to respond
more positively (see Figure 1.C below). Lastly, perceptions of government support
for students were nearly equally split: 41% indicated that government support of
education was good or very good, and 38% indicated that it was poor or very
poor.
Figure 1.C: School Staff Perception of Education Support During the Covid-19
Pandemic, by Role
While one of the ICT staff members interviewed stated that training opportunities
are available for teachers, he observed it wasn’t enough and that teachers need
to take personal initiatives to learn.
2.How far does the view differ between different stakeholders – public and
private, teachers and students?
Overall, respondents shared similar views regarding the usefulness of digital tools
in education and the notion that digital access is a human right. Regardless of the
type of school (mission, government, or private), students were just as likely to
have heard about e-learning prior to the pandemic (with 67% - 68% indicating
yes) and to believe that e-learning has a place in contemporary education (94% -
97% across the three school types). Significant differences between male and
female students were observed, which will be covered in the challenges section
below. All participating parents and guardians surveyed indicated that digital
learning is important for their children and only one was not aware of digital
education prior to the pandemic. All responding school staff indicated that that
digital learning has a place in education, but 2 of the 24 teachers were not aware
of e-learning prior to the health crisis.
With the more nuanced questions, there are some differences among students
from different types of schools. For government and mission schools, 76% and
78% (respectively) feel included in decisions about digital education, but this
percentage drops to 71% for private schools. Interestingly, despite feeling less
included in the decision making, private school students were slightly more likely
to feel like their views are reflected in the decisions made (64%, compared to
60% - 61% for government and mission schools). Key to note here is that, while
students tend to feel included in the decision-making process, they are less likely
to feel that the final decisions made regarding digital education reflect an
understanding and incorporation of their views.
Interestingly, government students were most likely to have utilized at least one
of the available e-learning tools listed on the survey (classwork assigned alone,
classwork completed online, online lessons, radio lessons, submitting classwork
online, and tv lessons). 16.47% of private school students and 14.29% of mission
school students indicated that they were unable to access any of the five e-
learning tools listed on the survey, as opposed to 10.84% of government students.
The alternative styles of learning applied at the start of the pandemic depended
not only on the ability to use digital tools but also on the availability of these tools
outside of the school settings, especially at home. DataReportal (2020) reports
7.87 million internet users in Cameroon in January 2020, in a population of over
20 million. If this is indicative of the available devices or tools for learning,
education continuity during the pandemic would have faced considerable
drawbacks unarguably. Moreover, students were used to studying in structured
environments where they were instructed on what to do by their teachers. Self-
studying only extended to assignments given by the teachers after their days at
school. Studying by themselves even with access to digital tools would prove
difficult as students needed to develop a structure for themselves. One teacher
expressing the downside of the digital learning strategy during the pandemic
indicated that “... some of our students are not disciplined enough to study on
their own, they do not focus on their study. The internet is full of distractions,
students turn to divert their study periods to doing other harmful activities on the
internet. So, it is not very effective, especially if they are not followed up." For the
lack of structure or the advent of one so ambivalent, a positive impact would
hardly be felt.
Figure 2.A: Student Perception of Impact to Education during the Pandemic, by
Type of School
Relating to the question of student satisfaction with the quality of education during
the pandemic, students at mission schools reported to have been more satisfied
than students of public and private schools. More than half (55.95%) of
government school students indicated some level of dissatisfaction with the quality
of their education during the pandemic, as compared to 39.00% for mission school
students and 43.73% for private school students (See Figure 2.B below).
Understandably, more students have access to and attend government schools as
compared to private and mission schools. The resources for digital learning,
although existent, would be unable to cater to the learning interests of every
student which explains the prioritization of some (ICT students). An ICT teacher
interviewed from a government school remarked that “In my school, we have just
about 50 to 60 functional computers ... we have a school of about 2000, so if we
just leave it be sometimes, some might not even go to class and occupy a machine
the whole day depriving others of access.” This indicates not only limited but
regulated access to digital tools during regular school times. Another teacher from
a government school commented that “Usually the norms for enrollment in schools
are not followed. In our school for example, you can find 3 students per computer
during the ICT lessons, which makes studies very difficult."
The private school students expressed the least amount of dissatisfaction, which
may seem unusual. Even though a lack of access to equipment and the internet
seems to be a recurring theme, government schools are most likely to have better
access. It might be interesting here to explore the reasons for satisfaction or
dissatisfaction on the part of students by evaluating the quality of education. On
one hand, one might explore the adequacy of measures and available tools and
on the other hand one might explore the capacity and willingness of teaching staff
to use digital teaching methods. The apparent gap in the training of teachers to
use digital methods of teaching and communication is also reflected in the
resources which were used to ensure the continuation of education. This is echoed
by the teachers and school staff interviewed and by current research. Farinkia and
Tambi (2018) explain that teachers’ use of ICT has been less than optimal because
of lack of training, resistance to change, no access to technological resources, lack
of focus on ICT, low confidence and low competences, formal opposition by
teachers to use pedagogical tools that they were not initially trained to utilize in a
professional way, etc., thereby creating a learning environment characterized by
insufficiency and incompetence. Ultimately, the fate of education at the start of
the pandemic and the use of digital learning tools and platforms for learning was
decided by the inherent absence of these practices as a component of education
in Cameroon.
Figure 2.B: Student Satisfaction with the Quality of Education during the
Pandemic, by type of School
Despite the general apprehension with the outcome of the emergency measures
put in place to ensure continuity in learning, students were generally positive
about how their school supported their education during the pandemic: 46.15%
of government, 47.28% of mission, and 51.21% of private students rated their
school’s support as good or very good. Conversely, 34.90% of government,
30.23% of mission, and 30.99% of private school students rated the government’s
support of education equally positively (as good or very good). This is not to say
that students rated the government’s support as poor; students were more likely
to choose “prefer not to say” when asked about the government as opposed to
their school: 13.22% of students opted out of sharing their opinion on their
school’s support, as opposed to 23.64% who opted out to respond on how the
government supported their education during the pandemic (see Figure 2.C,
below). Out of prevailing prudence to not question authority, it can be expected
that students would be wary of giving opinions on the competence of their school
authority or the government because of the current socio-political climate of the
two English-speaking regions of Cameroon, especially if they are being critical. Of
the three types of schools, mission school students were most likely to opt-out of
responding about how their school supported their education during the pandemic
(18.83% chose “prefer not to say”, as opposed to 8.28% and 11.86% for
government and private school students, respectively). This raises the question of
the importance of youth participation in general and especially in education policy.
In a context where the student feels valued and protected, they will be more likely
to express their opinions without apprehension, facilitating the task of the
policymakers in designing structures and measures more suited to their learning
needs. The report on Perceptions of Digital Access in the Southwest region of
Cameroon also done by SODEI, discusses in detail, the importance of youth
participation. (See Report on Digital Education in Cameroon: An Analysis into
Available Tools and Perceptions Regarding Benefits, Barriers, and Access to e-
Learning Tools in Southwest Cameroon).
Figure 2.C: Student Perception on Support to Their Education, by their School or
from the Government
3.What challenges were faced and what best practices can be shared and
implemented wider?
Students, parents and guardians, and school staff identified three major
challenges associated with implementing digital learning during the pandemic:
lack of access, ineffective e-learning tools, and a significant gender gap in
perception between male and female students. Lack of access is covered in more
detail in SODEI’s report (Digital Education in Cameroon: An Analysis into Available
Tools and Perceptions Regarding Benefits, Barriers, and Access to e-Learning Tools
in Southwest Cameroon), but this barrier is defined by financial, infrastructural,
and training challenges. This is also reflected in other pre-Covid-19 research as a
major factor that hinders digital learning take-off in Cameroon and most sub-
Saharan African countries (Nsolly N. and Charlotte N. 2016, Farinkia, N. and
Tambi, A., 2018, Farinka, N. 2018, Njouny, M. E., 2021). Many of the students
surveyed in this research (49.88%) perceived limited financial resources as the
most significant barrier to e-learning, followed closely by limited electricity
(43.98%), limited internet access (42.38%), and limitations on IT skill or
knowledge (34.03%). Further, while only 3.09% of students indicated an inability
to access the internet at home through any devices, the majority (51.34%) access
e-learning tools through their mobile phone; less than 20% have access to a
laptop or a desktop computer at home.
In their open-ended comments, several students, parents and guardians, and staff
suggested that computers should be made more widely available, with schools
having computer labs and/or the government providing free laptops to make
digital learning more accessible. One parent’s comment captured most of the
sentiments shared regarding limited access:
The staff interviewed and students who took part in the FGD also stressed lack of
access to digital learning tools, limited electricity supply and the lack of internet
data as the major challenges to digital learning. The school staff emphasized that
access to devices and the internet in school is a major challenge as a result of
underequipped computer labs vis a vis the high student population. They also
complained of lack of ICT knowledge and trained staff. Students in the FGD pointed
to similar issues and indicated that they learnt more and had better access to
digital devices and the internet through after-school computer training programs.
They resorted to using their underperforming phones for learning purposes during
the COVID-19 lockdown which to them was a major challenge.
When asked about the measures of distance learning they used during the COVID-
19 pandemic and their effectiveness, most students indicated utilizing classwork
assigned online or online lessons (see Figure 3.A, below). More than half (52.04%)
of students who used classwork assigned online rated it as effective or very
effective. 52.70% of students who used online lessons indicated this measure as
very effective or effective (there was a slightly stronger tendency to indicate online
lessons as very effective). 22.39% of the 134 students who provided open-ended
feedback regarding what worked well that should be embedded into future
methods of learning indicated WhatsApp as being an effective tool. Similarly,
20.15% of students who provided open-ended feedback also called out TV lessons
as working well, despite indicating slightly lower levels of effectiveness with these
than classwork assigned online or online lessons (with 44.04% of students rating
them as effective or very effective). Despite the effectiveness of online lessons,
and assigning and completing work online, only 35.94% of students indicated that
submitting classwork online was effective or very effective, and 28.41% stated
that they did not use this distance learning measure. The only measure used less
often than submitting classwork online was radio lessons, with 34.24% stating
that they did not use it.
Another teacher working for both government and private schools stated that:
“In the schools where I teach, the most common measure is that different
classrooms or different classes, especially the examination classes created
WhatsApp groups where teachers were involved with students, and they had to
exchange lessons”. The FGD students also overwhelmingly pointed to the use of
WhatsApp learning groups, but also attested having been introduced to other
platforms like Zoom and Google Meet through an after-school computer learning
program. One female student noted:
“The only time I learnt online was during the COVID-19 lockdown through a
WhatsApp group where notes and assignments were shared by teachers. I learnt
more about tools for online learning through SODEI’s computer program and it is
from there I discovered platforms such as Zoom and Google Meet”
WhatsApp learning was also highly criticized for its shortcomings. Staff members
indicated several challenges associated with WhatsApp learning which some
wouldn’t recommend for future use. A government schoolteacher observed that:
“WhatsApp is limited because for example students will be unable to download
large files. So, you cannot really give a lengthy lecture on a topic like global
warming using WhatsApp. It is financially challenging for the students. Secondly
it is difficult to evaluate students, there is no mechanism for follow up and some
might fraud”. A Computer Science teacher at a government school added that:
“WhatsApp has limitations, it cannot for example carry a group of more than 10
for a video discussion. In most cases the group will be more than 100, and very
difficult for live interaction. But however, we had no other choice, this was the
only way we could go about it”.
Another teacher pointed out that while students were able to utilize WhatsApp as
a learning tool, many of the answers were copy/paste from the internet and didn't
sufficiently show that the student had learned. So, effective becomes relative. The
tools are effective in that children were able to participate in the educational
process, but ineffective in that children weren't actually learning from that
method.
WhatsApp learning fell short of fully satisfying the needs of pedagogical continuity
due to lack of interaction. It was the preferred platform based on its accessibility
and ease of use for social communications than for its pedagogical merits. One of
the possible reasons for not adopting other more interactive alternatives could be
as Béché (2020) observed, the low level of technological development that
characterizes Cameroon’s educational system. Béché (2020) indicated that the
use of mobile phones and messaging apps for education continuity during the
Covid-19 pandemic was faced with issues of distraction, a mix of private
conversations and academic exchanges where in some cases the latter was
drowned by the former.
14
For more information visit: https://briteacademy.net/
students in Cameroon are examples of measures that could be fine-tuned to meet
the specific needs of students in Cameroon.
Added to the issues of quality is the problem of inequality in the education milieu
which existed prior to the pandemic. Béché (2020), Mbome and Atong (2020),
decry the existing educational inequalities which were further exacerbated by the
forced and unexpected switch to digital learning methods in Cameroon at the start
of the pandemic in the country. If obstacles are apparent in urban settings, it is
to be expected that rural settings would suffer an almost complete disruption of
their education because schools in urban areas tend to be more equipped than
those in rural areas and are more likely to be government-owned (Farinkia, N.
and Tambi, A., 2018).
Accompanying the other challenges is the digital divide which also exists between
students. A Government High School teacher felt that the impact of the digital
learning measures was “positive for a very few, the majority did not even know
how to use digital devices, so I cannot put it very much on the positive side."
Further, female students were nearly twice as likely to indicate not using any of
the e-learning tools listed in the survey than male students (see Figure 3.C below).
regardless of the digital learning method, female students were significantly more
likely to indicate not using it during the pandemic. For classwork assigned online,
completed online, online lessons, and submitting classwork online, female
students were nearly twice as likely to have not used the tool as their male
counterparts.
Figure 3.C: Student Indication of “Did Not Use” for each e-Learning Method, by
Gender
Female students were slightly less likely to indicate a positive impact to education
during the pandemic (48.80% for male students, as compared to 43.94% for
female students), yet they were more likely to rate their school’s support of
education during the pandemic as good or very good (46.32% for male, and
51.51% for female students). Male students were more likely to positively rate
the government’s support of their education during the pandemic (34.34% for
male, and 30.82% for female students) and to rate their school’s support as poor
or very poor (23.16% for male, and 18.32% for female students). Female students
were slightly more likely to opt out of rating the government’s support of their
education during the pandemic (21.51% for male, and 24.71% for female
students). Finally, female students also expressed lower levels of satisfaction with
the quality of their education during the pandemic, with 30.28% indicating
satisfied or very satisfied compared to 34.24% of male students.
The results of our survey indicate that both government and private school
students, and teachers had mixed feelings regarding the success of distance and
digital learning during the pandemic. Students were more dissatisfied with the
quality of education, citing lack of access and ineffective learning tools. Unreliable
electricity supply posed a major challenge to School on TV. More than 45% of
Cameroonians especially in the rural areas do not have access to electricity, hence
were de facto excluded from School on TV. Similarly, access to tools including
hardware and the internet, the lack of suitable digital learning platforms were
major challenges for an effective digital learning alternative. Barriers to distance
learning in Cameroon are multifaceted, making it very difficult for most students
to navigate through all the challenges. This is further exacerbated by the already
prevailing inequalities in education. Students from poor family backgrounds and
rural areas would stand no chance to cope with distance learning when their
counterparts in urban areas and from well-to-do backgrounds would maybe find
it easier but face challenges nonetheless.
One important lesson from the Covid-19 education response in Cameroon is that
the development of a more robust distance and digital education system is a
necessity; both government and the private sector have a stake in it. This also
includes training opportunities for the development of ‘techno-pedagogical’ skills
for teachers and students and the provision of ICT infrastructure. There is certainly
space for private sector involvement in the development of digital education
technologies as their contribution in advancing digital access in Cameroon is well
known. The development of new digital technologies has predominantly been
driven by private initiatives and is a perfect case for government and private sector
collaboration to advance technology for the benefit of all. In Cameroon, both the
government and private sector have been involved in the development and
advancement of digital education in the last two decades. However, these
measures haven’t been robust enough, received little institutional attention and
uncoordinated (Beche, 2020). The CIAC project initiated by the NGO ADCOME
referenced earlier, which focused on bridging the digital divide mainly in schools
working in partnership with the PTA is a good example of how government and
private sector partnership can advance digital education. Meanwhile, a unique
government sponsored and coordinated nationwide distance/digital education
platform will be most crucial to ensure a well-structured and coordinated
pedagogical continuity in the event of similar circumstances as the COVID-19
forced school shut-downs. Such a unique platform could be on the basis of state
and private sector collaboration to work on developing solutions to improve those
such as WhatsApp learning used during the pandemic
References
Akaba. J. and Nteta. P. (2020). Covid-19 School Closure in Cameroon -How is the
Education Sector Advancing With E-Learning?
Bernard J.M., Coulibaly B.S., & Winthrop R., (June 4, 2020) Education is crucial
to Africa’s Covid-19 Response OP-ED Brookings. Retrieved from
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/education-is-crucial-to-africas-covid-19-
response/
Farinkia, N., & Tambi, A. (2018). Evaluation of instructional facilities used in the
implementation of information and communication technology (ict) curriculum in
public secondary schools in the Southwest region of Cameroon. European journal
of education studies, 0. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1991
Haji S., Moluayonge, G. and Park, I. (2017), Teachers’ Use of Information and
Communications Technology in Education: Cameroon Secondary Schools
Perspectives. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,
volume 16 issue 3
Nganji, J., Kwemain, R., & Taku, C. (2010). Closing the digital gap in
Cameroonian secondary schools through the CIAC project. International journal
of education and development using information and communication technology,
6, 106-114.