Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Individual Assignment Business Economics Coverpage

    Uploaded by

    maddiedanielle033

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Individual Assignment Business Economics Coverpage

    Uploaded by

    maddiedanielle033
    7 views4 pages

    Original Title

    Individual Assignment Business Economics Coverpage_c304d4c83bb1ccd057868b5535072f1d

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views4 pages

    Individual Assignment Business Economics Coverpage

    Uploaded by

    maddiedanielle033

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    #Economic T3

    Modular Programme Assignment


    Cover Sheet
    (Individual Applied Wri ng Assessment)

    Please complete the form (in capital letters) and attach it securely to the front of your assignment before
    submitting your assignment.

    Student ID:

    Programme:

    Name of module: BUSINESS ECONOMICS Name of tutor:

    Section:

    Module code: E C N 6 1 7 0 4

    Assignment title:

    Submission Date: 4th July 2024 (11:59 pm) (week 11)


    Submission mode : Online via Turni n (Link on myTimes)
    Weigh ng: 35%

    I have read and understood the Taylor’s University Dual Award Regula ons on chea ng, plagiarism and
    collusion and state that this piece of work is our own and does not contain any unacknowledged work from
    any other sources.
    I authorise the University to test any work submi ed by me, using text comparison so ware, for instances of
    plagiarism. I understand this will involve the University or its contractor copying my work and storing it on a
    database to be used in future to test work submi ed by others.

    1
    Note: The a achment of this statement on any electronically submi ed assignments will be deemed to have
    the same authority as a signed statement.

    Signed: Date:

    2
    MARKING RUBRIC
    Taylor's Graduate Capabili es Marking Rubric (Effec ve from March 2023 semester onwards)
    MLOs Weightage Heading assessed Outstanding Mastering Developing (50- Beginning
    assessed A ributes Sub a ributes (35%) (80-100%) (65-79%) 64%) (0-49%) Score
    4-5 3.25 - 3.95 2.5 - 3.20 0 - 2.45
    TGC 2a : Problem solving

    Limited
    Detailed evidence of Adequate key relevant key
    Introduc on correct key points from Correct key points points provided point and
    ar cle and ra onale/ from the ar cle and and jus fied the limited
    skills

    jus fica on of topics clear ra onale of relevant topics to jus fica on of


    5% /models chosen chosen topics some extent topics.
    Defini on of the 4-5 3.25 - 3.95 2.5 - 3.20 0 - 2.45
    chosen relevant Adequate Too li le
    Iden fy the theories Explained the relevant Defined the theories defini on of explana on
    TGC 2a.1 problem 5% theories in depth. clearly. relevant theories. on the theory.
    MLO 3

    8 - 10 6.5 - 7.9 5 - 6.4 0 - 4.9


    TGC 2b : Cri cal and crea ve

    Applica on of the Applied the chosen Limited


    relevant theore cal topics effec vely to applica on in
    models to the key analyze ar cle content Able to link the connec ng
    thinking skills

    issues discussed in in depth and pro chosen topics to the Adequate theory and
    the ar cle. detailed conclusions ar cle content applica on ar cle
    10% based on the analysis. correctly provided content
    4-5 3.25 - 3.95 2.5 - 3.20 0 - 2.45
    Conclusion and Detailed summary of Failed to
    Analyse and Sugges on analysis and applicable Adequate summary Limited summary provide
    synthesize real world solu ons provided with some and solu ons summary and
    TGC 2b.4 the evidence 5% provided solu ons. provided solu ons
    4-5 3.25 - 3.95 2.5 - 3.20 0 - 2.45
    TGC 3 : Communica on skills

    Very clear and detailed Good and clear Limited


    Diagram diagram explana on explana on of diagram
    explana on which flows well. diagram and explana on
    Linked the changes in evidence of link Adequate which does
    the diagram to content between diagram explana on of not flow and
    MLO 4

    5% in the ar cle. and ar cle content. diagrams. is not clear.


    4-5 3.25 - 3.95 2.5 - 3.20 0 - 2.45
    Limited use of
    Referencing “Harvard”
    Use Adequate referencing or
    suppor ng Followed “Harvard” Followed “Harvard” referencing and no
    TGC 3.4 evidence 5% referencing with minor errors cita ons referencing
    Total out of 35

    3
    Any addi onal comments:

    1. Areas of strength:

    2. Areas of weakness:

    3. How to improve:

    Assessed by: Date:

    Sample Moderated by (if any): Date:

    You might also like