Intermediate Financial Management 12th Edition Brigham Solutions Manual Instant Download All Chapter
Intermediate Financial Management 12th Edition Brigham Solutions Manual Instant Download All Chapter
Intermediate Financial Management 12th Edition Brigham Solutions Manual Instant Download All Chapter
https://testbankdeal.com/product/intermediate-financial-
management-12th-edition-brigham-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/intermediate-financial-
management-13th-edition-brigham-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/intermediate-financial-
management-11th-edition-brigham-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/intermediate-financial-
management-11th-edition-brigham-test-bank/
Intermediate Financial Management 13th Edition Brigham
Test Bank
https://testbankdeal.com/product/intermediate-financial-
management-13th-edition-brigham-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/intermediate-financial-
management-10th-edition-brigham-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/fundamentals-of-financial-
management-12th-edition-brigham-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/essentials-of-financial-
management-3rd-edition-brigham-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/fundamentals-of-financial-
management-15th-edition-brigham-solutions-manual/
Chapter 9
Corporate Valuation and Financial Planning
ANSWERS TO BEGINNING-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS
We like to use discussion questions along with relatively simple and easy to follow calculations
for our lectures. Unfortunately, forecasting is by its very nature relatively complex, and it simply
cannot be done in a realistic manner without using a spreadsheet. Accordingly, our primary
“question” for Chapter 9 is really a problem, but one that can be discussed. Therefore, we base
our lecture primarily on the BOC model and we use the class period to discuss forecasting and
Excel modeling. We cover the chapter in about 2 hours, and then our students work a case on
the subject later in the course.
9-1 The major components of the strategic plan include the firm’s purpose, the scope of its
operations, its specific (quantified) objectives, its operating strategies, its operating
plan, and its financial plan.
Engineers, economists, marketing experts, human resources people, and so on all
participate in strategic planning, and development of the plan is a primary function of the
senior executives. Regional and world economic conditions, technological changes,
competitors’ likely moves, supplies of resources, and the like must all be taken into
account, along with the firm’s own R&D activities.
The effects of all these forces, under alternative strategic plans, are analyzed by use of
forecasted financial statements. In essence, the financial statements are used to simulate
the company’s operations under different economic conditions and corporate strategic
plans.
Since the strategic plan is necessarily somewhat nebulous, it is sometimes neglected
in practice on the grounds that it is difficult to quantify. We can only note that if a
company doesn’t think about the direction in which its industry is going, it is likely to
end up in bankruptcy, as most bankruptcies occur because an inaccurate business plan.
9-2 a. The sales forecast is the primary driver of the financial plan. Forecasted sales
determine the amount of capacity needed, inventory and receivables levels, profits,
and capital requirements. If a company forecasts its sales incorrectly, this can be
disastrous, as Cisco and Lucent learned recently. We discuss sales forecasting in the
BOC model.
b. See the BOC model for a detailed explanation. Essentially, we take the prior year’s
financial statements and then change them to reflect (1) changes in sales and (2)
policies that will affect things like the amount of inventories carried to support a
given amount of sales.
d. See the BOC model for a detailed explanation. Given the projected financial
statements, we can calculate various ratios, EPS, and FCF and then compare the
projected values with historical data and industry benchmarks. Various policies can
be considered, and their effects as revealed by the computer model can be analyzed.
A set of feasible policies that will produce the desired results, or perhaps the best
attainable results, will be adopted. Of course, that’s the easy part. The hard part is
operating the business so that the projected results will be realized.
9-3 The performance of the firm could be compared with the industry average. Also, as
shown in the model, we could see how the firm’s ROE, EPS, etc. would look if it could
get its operating ratios to the same level as the industry average.
Industry average data is also useful when preparing a business plan for a new
business. We could forecast sales, then forecast the financial statements based on
industry average date. The capital requirements (the amount of required debt and equity)
could be determined, and then the new firm could seek to raise the required funds. Many
new businesses fail because they don’t raise enough funds at the outset and are forced out
of business when they run out of cash. Forecasting as done in the model could head off
such disasters.
9-4 Managers are obviously concerned about forecast errors. The effects of such errors can
be analyzed by use of scenario and sensitivity analysis. Both types of analysis are
illustrated in the BOC model.
9-6 The AFN equation is useful in a pedagogic sense to get an idea of how sales increases
lead to required asset increases, and hence to a need for new capital. The equation is not
used in practice today because spreadsheet models provide so much more information
and are relatively easy to construct.
A* is assets that increase at the same rate as sales, L* is liabilities that increase
spontaneously at the same rate as sales, S0 is last year’s sales, S1 is forecasted sales for
the coming year, and ∆S is the forecasted increase in sales, M is the profit margin, and
RR is the percentage of earnings the firm retains.
The formula is simple and easy to use, but it assumes a constant relationship between
sales, assets, and liabilities, and a constant profit margin and retention ratio. As indicated
above, the formula is not used in practice because the financial statement approach is so
much better.
9-7 We could set the AFN equation up and use it to get an idea of the maximum sales growth
rate without external capital. However, we can use the model go get a better
approximation.
b. Spontaneous liabilities are the first source of expansion capital as these accounts
increase automatically through normal business operations. Examples of spontaneous
liabilities include accounts payable, accrued wages, and accrued taxes. No interest is
normally paid on these spontaneous liabilities; however, their amounts are limited due
to credit terms, contracts with workers, and tax laws. Therefore, spontaneous
liabilities are used to the extent possible, but there is little flexibility in their usage.
Note that notes payable, although a current liability account, is not a spontaneous
liability since an increase in notes payable requires a specific action between the firm
and a creditor. A firm’s profit margin is calculated as net income divided by sales.
The higher a firm’s profit margin, the larger the firm’s net income available to
support increases in its assets. Consequently, the firm’s need for external financing
will be lower. A firm’s payout ratio is calculated as dividends per share divided by
earnings per share. The less of its income a company distributes as dividends, the
larger its addition to retained earnings. Therefore, the firm’s need for external
financing will be lower.
Capital intensity is the dollar amount of assets required to produce a dollar of sales.
The capital intensity ratio is the reciprocal of the total assets turnover ratio. It is
calculated as Assets/Sales. The sustainable growth rate is the maximum growth rate
the firm could achieve without having to raise any external capital. A firm’s self-
supporting growth rate can be calculated as follows:
e. A firm has excess capacity when its sales can grow before it must add fixed assets
such as plant and equipment. “Lumpy” assets are those assets that cannot be acquired
smoothly, but require large, discrete additions. For example, an electric utility that is
operating at full capacity cannot add a small amount of generating capacity, at least
not economically. When economies of scale occur, the ratios are likely to change
over time as the size of the firm increases. For example, retailers often need to
maintain base stocks of different inventory items, even if current sales are quite low.
As sales expand, inventories may then grow less rapidly than sales, so the ratio of
inventory to sales declines.
9-2 Accounts payable, accrued wages, and accrued taxes increase spontaneously. Retained
earnings may or may not increase, depending on profitability and dividend payout policy.
9-3 The equation gives good forecasts of financial requirements if the ratios A0*/S and L0*/S,
the profit margin, and payout ratio are stable. This equation assumes that ratios are
constant. This would not occur if there were economies of scale, excess capacity, or
when lumpy assets are required. Otherwise, the forecasted financial statement method
should be used.
9-4 The five key factors that impact a firm’s external financing requirements are: Sales
growth, capital intensity, spontaneous liabilities-to-sales ratio, profit margin, and payout
ratio.
9-5 The self-supporting growth rate is the maximum rate a firm can achieve without having
to raise external capital. The self-supporting growth rate is calculated using the AFN
equation, setting AFN equal to zero, replacing the term ΔS with the term g × S0, and
replacing the term S1 with S0 × (1 + g). Once the AFN equation is rewritten with these
modifications, you can now solve for g. This “g” obtained is the firm’s self-supporting
growth rate.
9-6 a. +.
c. +.
d. +.
e. –.
f. –.
$7,000,000 $900,000
9-2 AFN = $1,200,000 – $1,200,000 – 0.06($9,200,000)(1 – 0.4)
$8,000,000 $8,000,000
= (0.875)($1,200,000) – $135,000 – $331,200
= $1,050,000 – $466,200
= $583,800.
The capital intensity ratio is measured as A0*/S0. This firm’s capital intensity ratio is
higher than that of the firm in Problem 9-1; therefore, this firm is more capital
intensive—it would require a large increase in total assets to support the increase in
sales.
Under this scenario the company would have a higher level of retained earnings
which would reduce the amount of additional funds needed.
AFN = Total assets – Preliminary total liabilities & equity = S2,929,500 – 2,690,937 = $238,563
AFN = Additional required long-term debt =$238,563
*Given in problem that firm will sell new common stock = $195,000.
**PM = 5%; Payout = 45%; NI2014 = $3,500,000 x 1.35 x 0.05 = $236,250.
Addition to RE = NI x (1 - Payout) = $236,250 x 0.33 = $129,937.
*Capacity sales = Sales/0.5 = $1,000/0.5 = $2,000 with respect to existing fixed assets.
Target FA = 0.25($2,000) = $500 = Required FA. Since the firm currently has $500 of
fixed assets, no new fixed assets will be required.
M (1 − POR )(S0 )
b. Self-supporting g =
A 0 * − L 0 * − M (1 − POR )(S0 )
0.03(1 − 0.40)(350)
=
122.5 − 17.5 − .03(1 − .4)(350)
= 6.38%
Forecast
Basis:
Percent of 2016 Pro
forecasted 2016 Pro Forma after
2015 sales Additions Forma Financing Financing
Cash $ 3.5 0.0100 $ 4.20 $ 4.20
Receivables 26.0 0.0743 31.20 31.20
Inventories 58.0 0.1657 69.60 69.60
Total current assets $ 87.5 $105.00 $105.00
Net fixed assets 35.0 0.100 42.00 42.00
Total assets $122.5 $147.00 $147.00
Deficit = $ 13.44
a.
2016
Forecast 2016
2015 Basis Pro Forma
Sales $36,000 1.15 × Sales15 $41,400
Operating costs 32,440 0.9011 × Sales16 37,306
EBIT $ 3,560 $ 4,094
Interest 460 0.10 × Debt15 560
EBT $ 3,100 $ 3,534
Taxes (40%) 1,240 1,414
Net income $ 1,860 $ 2,120
c. If debt is added throughout the year rather than only at the end of the year, interest
expense will be higher than in the projections of part a. This would cause net income to
be lower, the addition to retained earnings to be higher, and the AFN to be higher. Thus,
you would have to add more than $2,128 in new debt. This is called the financing
feedback effect.
Deficit = $ 128,783
9-10 The detailed solution is available in the file Ch09 P10 Build a Model Solution.xlsx at the
textbook’s Web site.
9-11 The detailed solution for is available in the file Ch09 P11 Build a Model Solution.xlsx at
the textbook’s Web site.
Hatfield Medical Supplies’s stock price had been lagging its industry averages, so its
board of directors brought in a new CEO, Jaiden Lee. Lee had brought in Ashley Novak, a
finance MBA who had been working for a consulting company, to replace the old CFO, and
Lee asked Ashley to develop the financial planning section of the strategic plan. In her
previous job, Novak’s primary task had been to help clients develop financial forecasts, and
that was one reason Lee hired her.
Novak began as she always did, by comparing Hatfield’s financial ratios to the
industry averages. If any ratio was substandard, she discussed it with the responsible manager
to see what could be done to improve the situation. The following data shows Hatfield’s latest
financial statements plus some ratios and other data that Novak plans to use in her analysis.
Mini Case: 9 - 16
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Selected Additional Data for 2015
Hatfield Industry Hatfield Industry
Op. costs/Sales 90.0% 88.0% Total liability/Total assets 48.3% 36.7%
Depr./FA 10.0% 12.0% Times interest earned 3.8 8.9
Cash/Sales 1.0% 1.0% Return on assets (ROA) 5.5% 10.2%
Receivables/Sales 14.0% 11.0% Profit margin (M) 3.30% 4.99%
Inventories/Sales 20.0% 15.0% Sales/Assets 1.67 2.04
Fixed assets/Sales 25.0% 22.0% Assets/Equity 1.94 1.56
Acc. pay. & accr. / Sales 4.0% 4.0% Return on equity (ROE) 10.6% 16.1%
Tax rate 40.0% 40.0% P/E ratio 8.0 16.0
ROIC 8.0% 12.5%
NOPAT/Sales 4.5% 5.6%
Total op. capital/Sales 56.0% 45.0%
Note: Hatfield was operating at full capacity in 2015. Also, you may observe small differences in items like the ROE
when calculated in different ways. Any such differences are due to rounding, and they can be ignored.
Mini Case: 9 - 17
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
a. Using Hatfield’s data and its industry averages, how well run would you say
Hatfield appears to be in comparison with other firms in its industry? What are its
primary strengths and weaknesses? Be specific in your answer, and point to various
ratios that support your position. Also, use the DuPont equation (see Chapter 7) as
one part of your analysis.
Answer: The DuPont equation shows the relationship among asset management, profitability
ratios, and leverage. By examining this equation we can determine where Hatfield falls
short of the industry.
Mini Case: 9 - 18
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
b. Use the AFN equation to estimate Hatfield’s required new external capital for 2016
if the sales growth rate is 10%. Assume that the firm’s 2015 ratios will remain the
same in 2016. (Hint: Hatfield was operating at full capacity in 2015.)
Answer:
c. Define the term capital intensity. Explain how a decline in capital intensity would
affect the AFN, other things held constant. Would economies of scale combined
with rapid growth affect capital intensity, other things held constant? Also, explain
how changes in each of the following would affect AFN, holding other things
constant: the growth rate, the amount of accounts payable, the profit margin, and
the payout ratio.
Answer: The capital intensity ratio is the amount of assets required per dollar of sales, A0*/S0, and
it has a major effect on capital requirements. A decline in the capital intensity ratio
would lower the need for external capital as this would mean a smaller amount of assets
would be required per dollar of sales. Economies of scale combined with rapid growth
would mean that it is likely that the capital intensity ratio would change over time as the
size of the firm increased.
Mini Case: 9 - 19
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Rapidly growing companies require large increases in assets and a corresponding
large amount of external financing, other things held constant. Accounts payable are
spontaneous liabilities that come about due to normal day-to-day business operations.
Firms don’t have a lot of control over the level of spontaneous liabilities as they’re a
function of industry norm and tax laws. The higher the firm’s level of accounts payable
(spontaneous liabilities) the smaller the amount of external financing, other things held
constant. The higher the profit margin, the larger the net income available to support
increases in assets, hence the less the need for external financing, other things held
constant. The less of its income a company distributes as dividends, the larger its
addition to retained earnings, hence the smaller the need for external capital—other
things held constant.
Answer: The self-supporting growth rate is the maximum growth rate the firm could achieve if it
had no access to external capital. From the data given, Hatfield’s self-supporting growth
rate is calculated as:
M= 3.30%
POR = 30.3%
1-POR = 69.7%
S0 = $2,000
A* = $1,200
L* = $80
Mini Case: 9 - 20
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
The higher the firm’s capital intensity ratio, the lower the firm’s self-supporting growth
rate because the firm would require more assets per dollar of sales. The higher the
firm’s profit margin and the lower its payout ratio, the higher the firm’s self-supporting
growth rate.
The calculated capital intensity ratio will change over time if the firm company is
expanding and if economies of scale and lumpy assets exist. When economies occur, the
capital intensity ratio will change over time as the size of the firm increases. In many
industries, technological considerations dictate that if a firm is to be competitive, it must
add fixed assets in large, discrete units. These assets are referred to as lumpy assets.
When this occurs the firm’s capital intensity ratio will change. So, at the point where the
assets must increase in a large amount, the capital intensity ratio will be high, so required
external financing will be high. As sales increase but assets don’t need to increase, the
capital intensity ratio will fall—until sales reach the point where large increases in assets
are required again.
e. Use the following assumptions to answer the questions below: (1) Operating ratios
remain unchanged. (2) Sales will grow by 10%, 8%, 5%, and 5% for the next four
years. (3) The target weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is 9%. This is the
No Change scenario because operations remain unchanged.
Actual Forecast
Inputs 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Sales growth rate: 10% 8% 5% 5%
Op. costs/Sales: 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Depr./FA 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Cash/Sales: 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Acct. rec. /Sales 14% 14% 14% 14% 14%
Inv./Sales: 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
FA/Sales: 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
AP & accr. / Sales: 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Tax rate: 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
Rate on all debt 8.0% 8% 8% 8%
Div. growth rate: 5% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Target WACC 9%
Mini Case: 9 - 21
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
e. 1. For each of the next four years, forecast the following items: sales, cash, accounts
receivable, inventories, net fixed assets, accounts payable & accruals, operating
costs (excluding depreciation), depreciation, and earnings before interest and taxes
(EBIT).
e. 2. Using the previously forecasted items, calculate for each of the next four years the
net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT), net operating working capital, total
operating capital, free cash flow, (FCF), annual growth rate in FCF, and return on
invested capital. What does the forecasted free cash flow in the first year imply
about the need for external financing? Compare the forecasted ROIC compare
with the WACC. What does this imply about how well the company is performing?
NOPAT = EBIT(1-T)
NOWC = (Cash + accounts receivable + inventories) − (Accounts payable & accruals)
Total operating capital = NOWC + Net fixed assets
FCF = NOPAT − Change in total operating capital
ROIC = NOPAT/Total operating capital
Mini Case: 9 - 22
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Scenario: Actual Forecast
No Change 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
NOPAT $90 $99 $107 $112 $118
NOWC $620 $682 $737 $773 $812
Total op. capital $1,120 $1,232 $1,331 $1,397 $1,467
FCF −$13 $8 $46 $48
Growth in FCF -164% 447.1% 5.0%
ROIC 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0%
e. 3. Assume that FCF will continue to grow at the growth rate for the last year in the
forecast horizon (Hint: 5%). What is the horizon value at 2019? What is the present
value of the horizon value? What is the present value of the forecasted FCF? (Hint:
use the free cash flows for 2016 through 2019). What is the current value of
operations? Using information from the 2015 financial statements, what is the
current estimated intrinsic stock price?
Scenario:
No Change
Horizon Value: Value of operations $958
+ ST investments $0
9(1+gL )
HV2019 = = $1,261 Estimated total intrinsic value $958
(WACC − gL )
− All debt $500
Value of Operations: − Preferred stock $0
Present value of HV $893 Estimated intrinsic value of equity $458
+ Present value of FCF $64 ÷ Number of shares 10
Value of operations = $958 Estimated intrinsic stock price = $45.75
Mini Case: 9 - 23
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
The estimated intrinsic stock value of $45.75 is less than the actual market price of
$52.80. The market price indicates that the market expected the operating performance
to improve; if operating performance doesn’t improve, the market price is likely to drop.
But keep in mind that stocks prices are very volatile, so a difference of −13% =
$45.75/$52.80 – 1 is not very big.
f. Continue with the same assumptions for the No Change scenario from the previous
question, but now forecast the balance sheet and income statements for 2016 (but
not for the following three years) using the following preliminary financial policy.
(1) Regular dividends will grow by 10%. (2) No additional long-term debt or
common stock will be issued. (3) The interest rate on all debt is 8%. (4) Interest
expense for long-term debt is based on the average balance during the year. (5) If
the operating results and the preliminary financing plan cause a financing deficit,
eliminate the deficit by drawing on a line of credit. The line of credit would be
tapped on the last day of the year, so it would create no additional interest expenses
for that year. (6) If there is a financing surplus, eliminate it by paying a special
dividend. After forecasting the 2016 financial statements, answer the following
questions.
Answer: Forecast sales and then items on the balance sheet. The forecast of sales is $2,200.
Forecast the operating items as a percent of sales. The preliminary financial policy
specifies no change in the long-term debt or common stock. Retained earnings increase
by the addition to retained earnings from the forecasted income statement. Leave the line
of credit blank for now.
Mini Case: 9 - 24
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Assets 2015 Input Basis for 2016 Forecast 2016
Cash $20 1% × 2016 Sales $22
Accts. rec. $280 14% × 2016 Sales $308
Inventories $400 20% × 2016 Sales $440
Total CA $700 $770
Net fixed assets $500 25% × 2016 Sales $550
Total assets $1,200 $1,320
Liabilities and equity
Accts. pay. & accruals $80 4% × 2016 Sales $88
Line of credit $0 Add LOC if fin. deficit
Total CL $80 $88
Long-term debt $500 No Change $500
Total liabilities $580 $588
Common stock $420 No Change $420
Retained earnings $200 Old RE + Add. to RE $253
Total common equity $620 $673
Total liabs. & equity $1,200 $1,261
Check: TA − TL & Equ. $59
Forecast the items on the income statement. Costs are a percent of sales, depreciation is a
percent of Net PP&E. Forecast interest expense on the long-term debt as the product of
the interest rate and the average balance on the long-term debt (i.e., the average of the
beginning value and the ending value). Pay a regular dividend. Leave the special
dividend blank for now.
Mini Case: 9 - 25
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
The next step is to identify the financing surplus or deficit. Start with the additions to
operating assets, subtract the increase in spontaneous liabilities (accounts payable and
accruals), subtract any new external financing from long-term debt or common stock,
and subtract the amount of reinvested net income (the amount that is not paid out in
common dividends). The result is the financing deficit (if it is negative) or the financing
surplus (if it is positive). If there is a deficit, draw on the LOC. If there is a surplus, pay a
special dividend.
There is a deficit of $59, so update the balance sheets by adding $59 to the line of credit.
Because the LOC is added at the end of the year, there is no additional interest, so there
is no need to update the income statement. If the LOC were instead added earlier in the
year, there would be additional interest, which would cause lower net income, which
would cause a lower addition to retained earnings, which would cause a bigger financial
deficit. This is called financing feedback. See Ch09 Tool Kit.xls and look at the
worksheet CFO Model for a simple way to resolve financing feedback and for an
extension of the 1-year forecasted financial statements to multiple years.
Mini Case: 9 - 26
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Assets 2015 Input Basis for 2016 Forecast 2016
Cash $20 1% × 2016 Sales $22
Accts. rec. $280 14% × 2016 Sales $308
Inventories $400 20% × 2016 Sales $440
Total CA $700 $770
Net fixed assets $500 25% × 2016 Sales $550
Total assets $1,200 $1,320
Liabilities and equity
Accts. pay. & accruals $80 4% × 2016 Sales $88
Line of credit $0 Add LOC if fin. deficit $59
Total CL $80 $147
Long-term debt $500 No Change $500
Total liabilities $580 $647
Common stock $420 No Change $420
Retained earnings $200 Old RE + Add. to RE $253
Total common equity $620 $673
Total liabs. & equity $1,200 $1,320
Check: TA − TL & Equ. $0
f. 2. What are some alternative ways than those in the preliminary financial policy that
Hatfield might choose to eliminate the financing deficit?
Cut dividends.
Add long-term debt.
Issue common stock.
Cut back on growth in operating plan.
Improve operating plan.
Mini Case: 9 - 27
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
g. Repeat the analysis performed the previous question but now assume that Hatfield
is able to improve the following inputs: (1) reduce operating costs (excluding
depreciation)/sales to 89.5% at a cost of $40 million; and (2) reduce
inventories/sales to 16% at a cost of $10 million. This is the Improve scenario.
Scenario:
Improve
Horizon Value: Value of operations $1,314
+ ST investments $0
9(1+gL )
HV2019 = (WACC − gL )
= $1,598 Estimated total intrinsic value $1,314
− All debt $500
Value of Operations: − Preferred stock $0
Present value of HV $1,132 Estimated intrinsic value of equity $814
+ Present value of FCF $182 ÷ Number of shares 10
Value of operations = $1,314 Estimated intrinsic stock price = $81.37
Mini Case: 9 - 28
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
The impact on the financial statements is shown below.
Scenario:
Improve
Assets 2015 Input Basis for 2016 Forecast 2016
Cash $20 1% × 2016 Sales $22
Accts. rec. $280 14% × 2016 Sales $308
Inventories $400 16% × 2016 Sales $352
Total CA $700 $682
Net fixed assets $500 25% × 2016 Sales $550
Total assets $1,200 $1,232
Liabilities and equity
Accts. pay. & accruals $80 4% × 2016 Sales $88
Line of credit $0 Add LOC if fin. deficit $0
Total CL $80 $88
Long-term debt $500 No Change $500
Total liabilities $580 $588
Common stock $420 No Change $420
Retained earnings $200 Old RE + Add. to RE $224
Total common equity $620 $644
Total liabs. & equity $1,200 $1,232
Check: TA − TL & Equ. $0
Mini Case: 9 - 29
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Improve 2015 Input Basis for 2016 Forecast 2016
Sales $2,000 110% × 2015 Sales $2,200
Op. costs (excl. depr.) $1,800 89.5% × 2016 Sales $1,969
Depreciation $50 10% × 2016 Net fixed assets $55
EBIT $150 $176
Less: Interest on LTD $40 8% × Avg bonds $40
Interest on LOC $0 8% × Beginning LOC $0
Pretax earnings $110 $136
Taxes (40%) $44 40% × Pretax earnings $54
Net income $66 $82
Regular common dividends $20 110% × 2015 Dividend $22
Special dividends $0 Pay if financing surplus $36
Addition to RE $46 Net income – Dividends $24
g. 1. Should Hatfield implement the plans? How much value would they add to the
company?
g. 2. How much can Hatfield pay as a special dividend in the Improve Scenario? What
else might Hatfield do with the financing surplus?
Answer: Hatfield can pay a special dividend of $35. Instead, Hatfield could repurchase stock,
repay debt, or purchase marketable securities.
Mini Case: 9 - 30
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.