Ebi - Methods
Ebi - Methods
Ebi - Methods
METHODS
2.1.2 Brand corporations and single brands – the European way ..................................14
Step 3: Determination of brand-specific cash flows BCF / capitalization interest rate Z .16
The importance of brands has diverse impacts in everyday life and in business management.
They offer, for example, following benefits:
A frequently quoted hypothesis is that branded products and services generate higher and
rising profits while promoting sales growth and providing more security. In combination with an
optimum control of marketing expenditure and brand investments, this revenue-side
development leads to companies that also create more value. Thus, brand-oriented
enterprises control the long-term trade-off of brand investments and brand revenues and, as a
result, achieve higher and faster rising share prices in comparison with other, less brand-
oriented enterprises.
Memory structures among costumers (e.g. image, trust, preference) have to be built and
monitored by appropriate actions, and measured using indicators. Enterprises should realise
that the potential of brands does not lie in generating short-term profits, but rather is long-term
in nature. Only brand owners who recognise the value of a brand and its strategic importance
will deal with it responsibly in order to benefit from its capital also in the future.
Based on our 20 years of experience in assessment and analysis of intangible assets as well
as our participation in national and international standards that we have influenced significanty
as chairman of the Austrian Committee for brands and patent valuation (ÖNORM A 6800 and
ÖNORM A 6801) and delegates to the ISO committee Brand Evaluation (ISO 10668), currently
as chairman of the Development Committee of ISO 20671 Brand Evaluation and the work as
a sworn and court certified expert we have dedicated ourselves to the highest professionalism
and independence. By our standards, we confirm our quality and build trust for our clients thus
making an important contribution which provides confidence for banks, investors, companies
and stakeholders.
Transparent
This requirement includes disclosure and quantification of valuation inputs, assumptions and
risks as well as, when appropriate, sensitivity analyses of the brand value to the main
parameters used in the valuation models.
Valid
Our valuations are based on valid and relevant inputs and assumptions as of the value date.
Reliable
If a valuation is repeated, it reliable gives a comparable and reconcilable result.
Sufficient
Brand valuations are based on sufficient data and analyses to form a reliable conclusion.
Objective
We conduct the valuation free any form of biased judgement.
The complete brand evaluation framework is illustrated in figure 1. Based on the underlying
Brand Evaluation Framework (Figure 1: Brand Evaluation Framework ISO 20671) and the
mandatory requirements of the international standards ISO 10668 (Brand valuation –
Requirements for monetary valuation) as well as ON A 6800 (Valuation of the intangible asset
“brand”) an assessment of the brand management, a legal analysis, a behavioral analysis, a
market analysis, an economic and political environment analysis as well as a financial analysis
is conducted.
The framework is divided into three parts. Each part calls for identifying the value of a brand in
a particular way. Each part builds on the previous part, moving from evaluating the brand from
the stakeholder’s to the entity’s point-of-view. The framework identifies input elements used to
develop brands and output dimensions that assess Brand Strength, which leads to Brand
Performance and Brand Valuation.
The monetary brand value has to represent the economic benefits of a brand across its
economic useful life. In general, the monetary value has to be calculated on the basis of brand
returns with reference to income, profits and/or cost savings.
The value of the brand rights is assessed on the basis of the current benefit for the future
owner ("Actual Use") according to the level of development and the degree of implementation.
Under the Royalty Relief Method, an analogy is used to approximate the financial profit
contributions (cash flows) of an intangible asset through the royalties saved by the asset’s
owner in comparison with the alternative of licensing in a comparable asset having the same
utility. The royalties are determined as the amount that would have to be paid if the subject
intangible asset was owned by a third party.
The notional license payments are determined on the basis of market royalty rates for
comparable assets (at arm’s length) that, for example, may be applied to sales. In this case,
the planned sales attributable to the subject intangible asset are then multiplied by the royalty
rate. The notional post-tax royalty payments determined are discounted to the value date using
the cost of capital specific to the asset.
The result is validated and checked for plausibility using methods of cost or market
approaches. Cost approaches are based on the net asset value method and use the costs
invested in the brand’s development or the costs required for replacing the existing brand to
measure the brand value. Market approach methods are based on actual transactions for
According to the formula below, the brand value BV is calculated by capitalizing the planned
brand cash flows BCF using the brand specific capitalization interest rate. This results from the
brand-specific cost of capital Z in the first phase and a perpetuity with a nominal perpetual
growth rate of brand cash flows g in the second phase.
For the calculation of the value of the brand value BV the following formula is used:
T
BCFt BCFT 1
BV
t 1 1 Z
t
Z g 1 Z T
BV Brand value
T valuation period (detailed planning of BCF for period T, T=5)
Z brand-specific capitalization interest rate
BCFt brand cash flow in period t after tax
BCFT brand cash flows starting from period T
t period (year)
g nominal perpetual growth rate of brand cash flows
As the accuracy of forecasts decreases when the forecasting horizon is prolonged, a 2-phase
procedure is used for forecasting the brand cash flow BCF as a function of the expected
economic life of the brand:
In addition, any costs required to achieve the price premium shall also be deducted. As a rule,
an unbranded or generic product is used to calculate brand cash flows. In practice, it will not
always be possible to identify such a reference product; in this case, the valuation is based on
the brand or product with the lowest brand strength.
The incremental cash flows may result from the generation of incremental cash inflows by the
subject intangible asset or from cost savings. Any additional costs incurred have to be taken
into account as well. The difference between the cash flows from the two enterprises, period
by period, represent the incremental cash flow attributable to the subject intangible asset. To
determine the value, these incremental cash flows are discounted at the value date using the
cost of capital specific to the asset.
𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 + 𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑢𝑚𝐵𝑅𝐴𝑁𝐷
𝑍=
𝑘
The weighted average cost of capital corresponds to the cost of capital weighted by the capital
structure of the peer group. In addition, brand-specific risk premiums RiskpremiumBRAND can
be used. In accordance to the formula stated below the weighted average cost of capital WACC
is calculated:
𝐸 𝐷𝐶
𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 = ∙ 𝑘𝐸 + ∙ 𝑘𝐷 ∙ (1 − 𝐶𝑇)
𝑇𝐶 𝑇𝐶
© 2019 European Brand Institute 10
WACC weighted average cost of capital
TC total capital
E equity
DC debt capital
kE cost of equity
kD cost of debt after taxes
CT corporate taxes
The cost of equity „ke” equals the required rate of return of the equity investors for the indebted
company. Based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), this figure can be calculated
according to the following formula:
𝑘𝐸 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽 ∙ 𝑀𝑅𝑃
kE cost of equity
β market volatility of an enterprise’s share price equals the volatility of the market
index
β= 1 The volatility of the enterprise’s share price equals the volatility of the
market index.
β>1 The volatility of the share price is higher than the volatility of the market
index. Thus, the share is more risky or more aggressive than the market.
β<1 The share’s market volatility is lower than the volatility oft he market
index. Thus, that share rather is a „conservative” investment.
MRP market risk premium; market interest rate to be paid by an enterprise minus a
risk-free interest rate
The selection and weighting of the factors is carried out by the valuator for specific sectors,
companies and business units.
On the basis of the acquisition price, market multipliers have to be calculated that have to be
applied to the brand to be valuated.
Multiple Revenue – Company Value and Share Brand Value to Company Value
Company-value-to-revenue multiples are used to calculate the brand value and then the share
of the brand value of the company value of a comparable brand with a similar brand strength.
The European Brand Institute offers itself as an interdisciplinary platform for experts of theory
and practice who are interested in the measurability of immaterial assets. An active
research work, regular events, publications of research results and brand evaluation
clarify value, influence, chances and risks of patents and brands for companies, stakeholders,
countries and regions and therefore pay dues to the sustainable development of society.
Every year, the European Brand Institute publishes rankings of brand corporations. For the
“GLOBAL TOP 100 BRAND CORPORATIONS RANKING“, the institute examines more than
3.000 brand corporations and their brands in 16 industries according to the latest ISO
valuation standards.
The study methodology is based on the long-standing evaluation practice and was developed
especially for this study:
On the one hand, the environment, market and segments in which the brand is “embedded”
are analyzed based on publicly available information and information from our database. On
the other hand, an analysis of (macro-) economic key figures and forecasts based on publicly
available information from the World Bank, IMF, EU, etc. is carried out.
Result: Economic forecasts for the segments as well as segment- and sector-specific risk
rates or discount rates
Financial and risk analysis based on historical development as well as on the forecast of future
developments
Result: Revenue forecasts for the brand company 5 years in detail, perpetual growth rate and
company-specific risk rates or discount rates
Step 3: Determination of the brand-specific cash flows BCF and capitalization interest
rate Z
a) Brand-specific cash flows – BCF
The calculation basis of the brand-specific cash flows is comprised of the following four factors.
The Brand Strength from Step 1, the brand-specific revenue forecasts from Step 2b, a brand-
specific demand analysis (i.e. analysis of the impact of the brand on the purchase decision
– this is, for example, greater in the segment Consumer Goods than in the segment Industry)
and the analysis of license analogies (Royalty Relief Method) for the target brand or brand
portfolio. Based on these factors, the brand-specific cash flow, i.e. the after tax cash flow solely
attributable to the brand or brand portfolio (BCF), is determined.
The brand-specific capitalization interest rate after tax is determined from the analysis of the
Brand Strength from Step 1 and the segment-specific or, in the further, company-specific
discount rate from Step 2b.
The brand-specific cash flows BCF in the forecast period T are discounted as per the formula
below to the Net Present Value and thus to the brand value BV, taking into account the
perpetual growth g with the brand-specific discount rate Z:
T
BCFt BCFT 1
BV
t 1 1 Z
t
Z g 1 Z T
BV brand value
T valuation period (detailed planning of BCF for period T, T=5)
Z brand-specific capitalization interest rate
BCFt brand cash flow in period t after tax
BCFT brand cash flows starting from period T
t period (year)
g nominal perpetual growth rate of brand cash flows
In order to ensure validity and reliability, the results are validated and made plausible by means
of market comparison methods using multiples.
A comparable brand is selected from the benchmark database and brand-specific multiples
are calculated using the known relation between brand value and revenue (Brand Revenue
Multiple) or the relation between company value and revenue as well as the share of the brand
value in the company value of a comparison company. These brand-specific multiples are used
for the target company and thus the values from Step 4 are made plausible.
On the basis of the brand valuations, changes of recent years and results per sector, sector-
specific analyses and valuations are prepared.
Country-specific and macroeconomic analyses and valuations are furthermore prepared based
on evaluations of the brand portfolios or brands, changes of recent years, results per country
and macroeconomic analyses and comparisons
Partner of
Based on our 20 years of experience in assessment and analysis of intangible assets as well
as our participation in national and international standards that we have influenced strongly as
chairman of the Austrian Committee for brands and patent valuation (ÖNORM A 6800 and
ÖNORM A 6801) and delegates to the ISO committee Brand Evaluation (ISO 10668), currently
as chairman of the Development Committee of ISO 20671 Brand Evaluation and the work as
a sworn and court certified expert we have dedicated ourselves to the highest professionalism
and independence.
By our standards, we confirm our quality and build trust for our clients thus making an important
contribution which provides confidence for banks, investors, companies and stakeholders.
IMPRINT
Kontakt
Kommerzialrat
DI Dr. Gerhard Hrebicek, MBA
CEO
43 1 532 1000 52
[email protected]