Human Motor Control 2nd Edition Rosenbaum Test Bank All Chapters
Human Motor Control 2nd Edition Rosenbaum Test Bank All Chapters
Human Motor Control 2nd Edition Rosenbaum Test Bank All Chapters
https://testbankfan.com/product/motor-learning-and-control-
concepts-and-applications-11th-edition-magill-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/motor-learning-and-control-
concepts-and-applications-10th-edition-magill-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/investment-banking-valuation-
leveraged-buyouts-and-mergers-and-acquisitions-2nd-edition-
rosenbaum-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/understanding-motor-controls-3rd-
edition-herman-test-bank/
Understanding Motor Controls 3rd Edition Herman
Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/understanding-motor-controls-3rd-
edition-herman-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/deviance-and-social-control-a-
sociological-perspective-2nd-edition-inderbitzin-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/human-memory-2nd-edition-
radvansky-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/human-physiology-2nd-edition-
sherwood-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/contemporary-human-geography-2nd-
edition-rubenstein-test-bank/
Chapter 7 Multiple-Choice Quiz
7. A method that has been used to determine how long it takes to use visual
feedback to correct manual positioning movements is
a. Have people move back and forth between targets without any visual
feedback in any condition
b. Have people move back and forth between targets with full visual
feedback in all conditions
c. Have people move back and forth between targets with visual
feedback available from one side of the space but not the other
d. Have people move back and forth between targets at different rates
both with and without visual feedback
a. MT = a + b log2(2A/W)
b. MT = a + b log2(2W/A)
c. MT = a / b log2(2A/W)
d. MT = b / a log2(2W/A)
10. Which of the following would best support the equilibrium point
hypothesis?
11. If you favored the discrete view over the continuous view of manual
positioning, you would argue that
a. Coordinative structures
b. Coupling of oscillators
c. Conceptual difficulties
d. All of the above
15. When one hand aims for a target with some index of difficulty (ID), its
movement time
16. Which two events tend to coincide during reaching and grasping?
18. In tasks involving finger movements, it has been found, even in patients
lacking sensory feedback from their fingers, that
19. Babies appear to take full advantage of visual feedback for reaching by
20. When people turn cranks that cause flags to revolve via gears
a. The people can easily generate complex rotation ratios if the seen
rotation ratios are complex
b. The people can easily generate simple rotation ratios if the seen
rotation ratios are simple
c. The people can easily generate complex rotation ratios if the seen
rotation ratios are simple
d. Both b and c
1. d
2. b
3. a
4. d
5. c
6. d
7. d
8. a
9. d
10. a
11. a
12. c
13. d
14. d
15. c
16. a
17. b
18. c
19. d
20. d
OPEN ANNEALING.
Open annealing, or annealing without boxes or pipes, is practised
wherever there are comparatively few pieces to anneal and where a
regular annealing-plant would not pay, or in a specially arranged
annealing-furnace where drill-wire, clock-spring steel, etc., are to be
annealed.
For ordinary work a blacksmith has near his fire a box of dry lime
or of powdered charcoal. He brings his piece up to the right heat and
buries it in the box, where it may cool slowly. In annealing in this way
it is well not to use blast, because it is liable to force all edges up to
too high a heat and to make a very heavy scale all over the surface.
With a little common-sense and by the use of a little care this way of
annealing is admirable.
It is a common practice where there is a furnace in use in
daytime and allowed to go cold at night to charge the furnace in the
evening, after the fire is drawn, with steel to be annealed, close the
doors and damper, and leave the whole until morning. The furnace
does not look too hot when it is closed up, but no one knows how hot
it will make the steel by radiation: the steel is almost always made
too hot, it is kept hot too long, and so converted into cast iron, and
there is an excessively heavy scale on it.
Many thousands of dollars worth of good steel are ruined
annually in this way, and it is in every way about the worst method of
annealing that was ever devised.
To anneal wire or thin strands in an open furnace the furnace
should be built with vertical walls about two feet high and then
arched to a half circle. The inports for flame should be vertical and
open into the furnace at the top of the vertical wall; the outports for
the gases of combustion should be vertical and at the same level as
the inports and on the opposite side of the furnace from the inports.
These outflues may be carried under the floor of the furnace to keep
it hot.
The bottom of the door should be at the level of the ports to keep
indraught air away from the steel. The annealing-pot is then the
whole size of the furnace—two feet deep—and closed all around.
The draught should be regulated so that the flame will pass
around the roof, or so nearly so as to never touch the steel, not even
in momentary eddies.
In such a furnace clock-spring wire not more than .01 inch in
diameter, or clock-spring strands not more than .006 to .008 inch
thick and several hundred feet long, may be annealed perfectly. The
steel is scaled of course, but the operation is so quick and so
complete that there is no decarbonized surface under the scale.
This plan is better than the Jones method or any closed method,
because the big boxes necessary to hold the strands or coils cannot
be heated up without in some parts overheating the steel; all of
which is avoided in the open furnace, because by means of peep-
holes the operator can see what he is about, and after a little
practice he can anneal large quantities of steel uniformly and
efficiently.
VIII.
HARDENING AND TEMPERING.
AS TO HARDNESS.
Prof. J. W. Langley showed by sp. gr. determinations that steel
quenched from 212° F. in water at 60° F. showed the hardening
effect of such quenching, the difference of temperature being only
152° F.
Prof. S. P. Langley, of the Smithsonian, proved the same to be
true by delicate electrical tests, and these again were confirmed by
Prof. J. W. Langley in the laboratory of the Case School of Sciences.
A piece of refined steel will rarely be hard enough to scratch
glass. A piece of steel quenched from creamy heat will almost
always scratch glass. The maximum hardness is produced by the
highest heat, or when temperature minus cold is a maximum; the
least hardness is found by quenching at the lowest heat above the
cooling medium, or when temperature minus cold is a minimum—the
time required to quench being a minimum in both cases.
What occurs between these limits? Is the curve of hardness a
straight line, or an irregular line?
Let a piece of steel be heated as uniformly as possible from a
creamy heat at one end to black at the other, and then be quenched.
Now take a newly broken hard file and draw its sharp corner
gently and firmly over the piece, beginning at the black-heated end.
The file will take hold, and as it is drawn along it will be felt that the
piece becomes slightly harder as the file advances, until suddenly it
will slip, and no amount of pressure will make it take hold above that
point. The piece has become suddenly file hard.
Next try the same thing with a diamond; the diamond will cut
easily until the point is reached where the file slipped, then there will
be found a great increase of hardness.
From this point to the end of the piece it is observed readily by
the action of the diamond that there is a gradual increase of
hardness from the hump to the end of the piece to the creamy-
heated end. Attempts were made to measure this curve of hardness
by putting a load on the diamond and dragging it over the piece; but
no diamond obtainable would bear a load heavy enough to produce
a groove that could be measured accurately by micrometer. An
examination of such a groove, through a strong magnifying-glass
revealed the conditions plainly; the groove of hardness may be
illustrated on an exaggerated scale; thus:
The next question was, Where does this hump occur, and what is
the cause of it?
Careful observation showed that it occurred at the point of
recalescence, at the refining-point. This word point must not be
taken as space without dimension in this connection; it is used in the
common sense of at or adjacent to a given place. There is of course
a small allowable range of temperature above any given exact point
of recalescence, such as 655° C. or 1211° F.
By superimposing Langley’s curves of cooling and of hardening
(see Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., Vol. XXVII, p. 403), the relation
between recalescence and the hardening-hump is obvious.
It is safe to say that experience proves that the refined condition
is the best for all cutting-tools of every shape and form.
It seems to be obvious; the steel is then in its strongest condition,
and when the grain is finest, the crystals the smallest, a fine edge
should be the most enduring, because there is a more intimate
contact between the particles. That a steel will refine well, and be
strong in that condition is the steel-maker’s final test of quality.
No steel-maker who has a proper regard for the character of his
product will accept raw material upon mere analysis; analysis is of
the utmost importance, for material for steel-making must be of a
quality that will produce a certain quality of steel, or the result will be
an inferior product. This applies to acid Bessemer and open-hearth,
and to crucible-steel especially; the basic processes admit of a
reduction of phosphorus not obtainable in the others.
In making fine-tool steel a bad charge in the pot inevitably means
a bad piece of steel. It may happen also that an iron of apparently
good analysis will not produce a really fine steel; then there must be
a search for unusual elements, such as copper, arsenic, antimony,
etc., or for dirt, left in the iron by careless working. The refining-test
then is as necessary as analysis, for if steel will not refine thoroughly
it will not make good tools. Battering-tools, such as sledges,
hammers, flatters, etc., should be refined carefully, for although their
work is mainly compressive they are liable to receive, and do get,
blows on the corners and edges that would ruin them if they were not
in the strongest condition possible.
The reasons for refining hot-working tools have been stated
already. Engraved dies for use in drop-presses where they are
subjected to heavy blows are undoubtedly in the most durable
condition when they are refined, but they are subjected not only to
impact, but to enormous compression, and therefore they must be
hardened deeply. When a die-block is heated so as to refine, and
then is quenched, it hardens perfectly on the surface and not very
deeply, and it is quite common in such a case to see a die crushed
by a few blows: the hardened part is driven bodily into the soft steel
below it, and the die is ruined; thus: