Operations Management 14th Ed 14th Edition Stevenson Full Chapter Instant Download
Operations Management 14th Ed 14th Edition Stevenson Full Chapter Instant Download
Operations Management 14th Ed 14th Edition Stevenson Full Chapter Instant Download
Edition Stevenson
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/operations-management-14th-ed-14th-edition-steven
son/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-1259696619-
operations-and-supply-chain-management-14th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/management-14th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/management-14e-14th-edition-
richard-l-daft/
https://ebookmass.com/product/management-14th-edition-john-r-
schermerhorn/
eTextbook 978-1337090582 Contemporary Financial
Management 14th Edition
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-1337090582-
contemporary-financial-management-14th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-0078028663-
comprehensive-stress-management-14th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-financial-
management-14e-14th-edition-jeff-madura/
https://ebookmass.com/product/racial-and-ethnic-groups-14th-
edition-14th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/selling-today-partnering-to-create-
value-14th-edition-14th-edition/
page i
Operations Management
page ii
page iii
Operations Management
FOURTEENTH EDITION
William J. Stevenson
Saunders College of Business
Rochester Institute of Technology
image
image page iv
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121.
Copyright © 2021 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Printed in the
United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or
distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval
system, without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education, including,
but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or
broadcast for distance learning.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LWI 24 23 22 21 20
ISBN 978-1260-57571-2
MHID 1-260-57571-3
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an
extension of the copyright page.
The internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of
publication. The inclusion of a website does not indicate an endorsement by the
authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education does not
guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
page v
Supply Management
Eighth Edition
Johnson
Project Management
Brown and Hyer
Managing Projects: A Team-Based Approach Larson
Project Management: The Managerial Process Eighth
Edition
Service Operations
Management
Bordoloi, Fitzsimmons, and
Fitzsimmons
Service Management: Operations, Strategy,
Information Technology Ninth Edition
Management Science
Hillier and Hillier
Introduction to Management Science: A Modeling and
Case Studies Approach with Spreadsheets Sixth Edition
Business Forecasting
Keating and Wilson
Operations Management
Cachon and Terwiesch
Operations Management
Second Edition
Cachon and Terwiesch
Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to
Operations Management Fourth Edition
Operations Management
Fourteenth Edition
Swink, Melnyk, and Hartley
Managing Operations Across the Supply Chain Fourth
Edition
Business Statistics
Bowerman, Drougas, Duckworth, Froelich, Hummel,
Moninger, and Schur Business Statistics and Analytics
in Practice Ninth Edition
McGuckian
Connect Master: Business Statistics
Business Analytics
Jaggia, Kelly, Lertwachara, and Chen
Business Analytics: Communicating with Numbers
page vi
Preface page vii
Acknowledgments
I want to thank the many contributors to this edition.
Reviewers and adopters of the text have provided a
“continuously improving” wealth of ideas and suggestions. It
is encouraging to me as an author. I hope all reviewers and
readers will know their suggestions were valuable, were
carefully considered, and are sincerely appreciated. The list
includes post-publication reviewers.
page viii
Finally, I would like to thank all the people at
McGraw-Hill for their efforts and support. It is always a
pleasure to work with such a professional and competent
group of people. Special thanks go to Noelle Bathurst,
Portfolio Manager; Michele Janicek, Lead Product Developer;
Fran Simon and Katie Ward, Product Developers; Jamie Koch,
Assessment Content Project Manager; Sandy Ludovissy,
Buyer; Matt Diamond, Designer; Jacob Sullivan, Content
Licensing Specialist; Harper Christopher, Executive
Marketing Manager; and many others who worked behind
the scenes.
I would also like to thank the many reviewers of previous
editions for their contributions: Vikas Agrawal, Fayetteville
State University; Bahram Alidaee, University of Mississippi;
Ardavan Asef-Faziri, California State University at
Northridge; Prabir Bagchi, George Washington State
University; Gordon F. Bagot, California State University at
Los Angeles; Ravi Behara, Florida Atlantic University;
Michael Bendixen, Nova Southeastern; Ednilson Bernardes,
Georgia Southern University; Prashanth N. Bharadwaj,
Indiana University of Pennsylvania; Greg Bier, University of
Missouri at Columbia; Joseph Biggs, Cal Poly State
University; Kimball Bullington, Middle Tennessee State
University; Alan Cannon, University of Texas at Arlington;
Injazz Chen, Cleveland State University; Alan Chow,
University of Southern Alabama at Mobile; Chrwan-Jyh,
Oklahoma State University; Chen Chung, University of
Kentucky; Robert Clark, Stony Brook University; Loretta
Cochran, Arkansas Tech University; Lewis Coopersmith,
Rider University; Richard Crandall, Appalachian State
University; Dinesh Dave, Appalachian State University; Scott
Dellana, East Carolina University; Kathy Dhanda, DePaul
University; Xin Ding, University of Utah; Ellen Dumond,
California State University at Fullerton; Richard Ehrhardt,
University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Kurt Engemann,
Iona College; Diane Ervin, DeVry University; Farzaneh Fazel,
Illinois State University; Wanda Fennell, University of
Mississippi at Hattiesburg; Joy Field, Boston College; Warren
Fisher, Stephen F. Austin State University; Lillian Fok,
University of New Orleans; Charles Foley, Columbus State
Community College; Matthew W. Ford, Northern Kentucky
University; Phillip C. Fry, Boise State University; Charles A.
Gates Jr., Aurora University; Tom Gattiker, Boise State
University; Damodar Golhar, Western Michigan University;
Robert Graham, Jacksonville State University; Angappa
Gunasekaran, University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth;
Haresh Gurnani, University of Miami; Terry Harrison, Penn
State University; Vishwanath Hegde, California State
University at East Bay; Craig Hill, Georgia State University;
Jim Ho, University of Illinois at Chicago; Seong Hyun Nam,
University of North Dakota; Jonatan Jelen, Mercy College;
Prafulla Joglekar, LaSalle University; Vijay Kannan, Utah
State University; Sunder Kekre, Carnegie-Mellon University;
Jim Keyes, University of Wisconsin at Stout; Seung-Lae Kim,
Drexel University; Beate Klingenberg, Marist College; John
Kros, East Carolina University; Vinod Lall, Minnesota State
University at Moorhead; Kenneth Lawrence, New Jersey
Institute of Technology; Jooh Lee, Rowan University; Anita
Lee-Post, University of Kentucky; Karen Lewis, University of
Mississippi; Bingguang Li, Albany State University; Cheng Li,
California State University at Los Angeles; Maureen P. Lojo,
California State University at Sacramento; F. Victor Lu, St.
John’s University; Janet Lyons, Utah State University; James
Maddox, Friends University; Gita Mathur, San Jose State
University; Mark McComb, Mississippi College; George
Mechling, Western Carolina University; Scott Metlen,
University of Idaho; Douglas Micklich, Illinois State
University; Ajay Mishra, SUNY at Binghamton; Scott S.
Morris, Southern Nazarene University; Philip F. Musa,
University of Alabama at Birmingham; Roy Nersesian,
Monmouth University; Jeffrey Ohlmann, University of Iowa at
Iowa City; John Olson, University of St. Thomas; Ozgur
Ozluk, San Francisco State University; Kenneth Paetsch,
Cleveland State University; Taeho Park, San Jose State
University; Allison Pearson, Mississippi State University;
Patrick Penfield, Syracuse University; Steve Peng, California
State University at Hayward; Richard Peschke, Minnesota
State University at Moorhead; Andru Peters, San Jose State
University; Charles Phillips, Mississippi State University;
Frank Pianki, Anderson University; Sharma Pillutla, Towson
University; Zinovy Radovilsky, California State University at
Hayward; Stephen A. Raper, University of Missouri at Rolla;
Pedro Reyes, Baylor University; Buddhadev Roychoudhury,
Minnesota State University at Mankato; Narendra Rustagi,
Howard University; Herb Schiller, Stony Brook University;
Dean T. Scott, DeVry University; Scott J. Seipel, Middle
Tennessee State University; Raj Selladurai, Indiana
University; Kaushic Sengupta, Hofstra University; Kenneth
Shaw, Oregon State University; Dooyoung Shin, Minnesota
State University at Mankato; Michael Shurden, Lander
University; Raymond E. Simko, Myers University; John
Simon, Governors State University; Jake Simons, Georgia
Southern University; Charles Smith, Virginia Commonwealth
University; Kenneth Solheim, DeVry University; Young Son,
Bernard M. Baruch College; Victor Sower, Sam Houston
State University; Jeremy Stafford, University of North
Alabama; Donna Stewart, University of Wisconsin at Stout;
Dothang Truong, Fayetteville State University; Mike Umble,
Baylor University; Javad Varzandeh, California State
University at San Bernardino; Timothy Vaughan, University
of Wisconsin at Eau Claire; Emre Veral, Baruch page ix
College; Mark Vroblefski, University of Arizona;
Gustavo Vulcano, New York University; Walter Wallace,
Georgia State University; James Walters, Ball State
University; John Wang, Montclair State University; Tekle
Wanorie, Northwest Missouri State University; Jerry Wei,
University of Notre Dame; Michael Whittenberg, University
of Texas; Geoff Willis, University of Central Oklahoma;
Pamela Zelbst, Sam Houston State University; Jiawei Zhang,
NYU; Zhenying Zhao, University of Maryland; Yong-Pin Zhou,
University of Washington.
William J. Stevenson
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
was said to have done the two miles in forty “flat.” We felt willing,
however, to trust Carl for the two miles.
John Blake decided that for once the whole team should go to
Chamberlain. Usually our funds were low, and only the men who
were absolutely necessary were taken; but this year the
subscriptions had been more liberal.
Bobby Hart was almost as much pleased as anyone at John’s
decision. Bobby had worked hard during the two years he had been
in school, and deserved to get into a real race. He was not a great
runner, but there is plenty of room on the track in the “distance” runs.
“I’m going to try for third in the mile,” Bobby confided to me on
Friday night. “I think I can do better than I ever have done.”
“Yes, but I’m afraid you can’t get third. First will go either to Carl or
to Dick Bannet, and Maynard’s sure to have a man close to them. I
shouldn’t wonder if Carl let Bannet have the mile and saved himself
for the two.”
“Well, anyway, I’ll have the fun of trying,” answered Bobby.
We went over to Chamberlain Saturday morning, and nearly the
whole school went with us.
Bobby was in great spirits. He kept us laughing all the way over,
and I could not help thinking what a difference there was between
him and Carl Atherton. There was Bobby, as happy as a clam
because they had entered him for the mile and the two mile with no
chance in the world of his winning better than third, and small hope
of that; and there was Carl, happy, too, perhaps, but not showing it a
bit, just sitting down at the end of the car talking to the trainer or
reading a magazine, yet knowing all the time that he was sure of one
cup, if not two. I could not help thinking that of the two perhaps
Bobby would have made the better captain, if getting close to the
fellows and heartening them up had anything to do with it.
We had luncheon at twelve o’clock, and at half-past one we piled
into a coach and drove out to the field. The old village was much
decorated, and the crimson of Preston was more plentiful than the
Maynard blue. Of course the orange and gray of Chamberlain was
everywhere.
We went into our dressing tent, put on our running clothes, and
then went out and limbered up a bit.
At two o’clock the half mile was started, and we were pretty well
pleased with ourselves when it was over. Maynard got third place,
but the one point for Maynard did not look important against eight
that we won.
Then came the trials for the hundred yards; two of our men
qualified. We did not expect much from the sprints, and we did not
get much. In the finals we took third place; Maynard won first and
Chamberlain second. That started the cheering, for the orange and
gray was pretty well represented on the stands, where Maynard and
Preston had each only a handful of fellows. When they called us for
the trials of the high hurdles, I did not have any trouble in winning
from the two Chamberlain runners and the one Maynard man
opposed to me. Then came the mile run.
Each school was allowed three starters; our entries were Carl
Atherton, Dick Bannet and Bobby Hart. I heard the trainer giving
them their instructions.
“This is Bannet’s race if he can get it,” he said. “But if Bannet can’t
win it, you must, Atherton. Hart, here, will start in and make the pace
for you two, and at the end of the third lap you must draw up to the
front. Save yourself for the two miles if you can, Atherton; but if you
have to win this, do it. We can’t take any chances. And you see if
you can’t take third place, Hart.”
The nine runners did some pretty maneuvering for the pole. When
they went down the back stretch on the first lap, Bobby was making
pace and Carl and Bannet were running fourth and fifth. That was
the order for two laps. Then a Maynard chap named Green sprinted
and took the lead. Bannet pushed up to third place.
Bobby held on for a while, then dropped back. He had just about
used himself up. Beckner, the Maynard “crack,” was running strongly
in sixth place, and Carl was watching him closely at every turn.
When the last lap began only five men were left in the running—
Green, Bannet, Fuller of Chamberlain, Carl and Beckner.
That was a pretty race; but it did not come out right for us. When
the home stretch began, Fuller passed Bannet and Beckner got
away from Carl. Then it was Fuller, Bannet and Beckner all the way
to within twenty feet of the tape, with a couple of thousand
spectators yelling like mad, and crimson and blue and orange flags
waving.
Carl was trying hard to come forward, but he had waited too long
and was out of it; just as much out of it as Bobby, who was jogging
doggedly along half a lap behind. Twenty feet from the finish Fuller
spurted again and left two yards between him and the two others,
who were fighting hard for second place.
“Come on, Dick!” we shrieked. “Come on! Come on!”
But Bannet could not do any more, and Beckner drew slowly away
from him in the last half dozen strides. Bannet was used up when we
caught him. And Fuller, too, was pretty tired. Only Beckner seemed
fresh, and we knew then that he could have had first place if he had
wanted it, and that he was saving himself for the two miles.
Things did not look so bright for us after that race. And after the
next one, the finals in the one-hundred-and-twenty-yard hurdles,
they looked worse; for all I could do was to get second by a hair’s
breadth; Maynard took first by several yards and Chamberlain third.
I was pretty well cut up over that, but there was still the two-
hundred-and-twenty, and I vowed that I would do better in that.
There was need of improvement, for we had thirteen points to
Maynard’s fourteen, with Chamberlain not far behind with nine.
Things were not happening at all as we had figured them.
We had counted on eight points in the quarter-mile race, but all we
got was three, for almost at the start Carstein of Chamberlain left
everyone behind and won by fully thirty yards! That was the trouble
with Chamberlain; you never could tell what mischief it would cause.
They called us out for the two-hundred-and-twenty-yard hurdle
race. The Maynard man and I were nip and tuck at the second
hurdle. I was a little quicker on the cinders than he, but he hurdled a
good three inches lower than I, and that made things even. But at
the fourth hurdle he got down too low and went over the bar. That
put him out of pace a little, and I ran for all I was worth. I tipped the
next hurdle myself, but not enough to throw me out.
At the seventh, I think it was, I was running even with the chap at
the far side of the track and the Maynard fellow was behind. After
that I put every ounce into beating the unknown—for there was no
time to see who he was—and we had a battle royal. We came over
the last hurdle right together, and only my speed on the ground beat
him, and then by very little. Maynard finished a close third. And when
I turned round and looked at the chap I’d beaten, I found it was one
of our own men. Bert Poole, who had never won a place before in
his life!
We felt better after that, for those eight points put us ahead; but
when presently Maynard won six points in the furlong dash and
Chamberlain got the remaining three, we began to worry again. The
results from the field events then began to come in, and added to our
anxiety. Chamberlain had taken first in the high jump, as we
expected, but Maynard had left us only third place. In the broad jump
Maynard had won first place and third, and given us second. In the
pole vault that troublesome Chamberlain had again taken first;
Maynard had taken second and Preston third. In the shot put we had
first and second, and Maynard had taken third. In the hammer throw
Maynard had beaten us for first, we had taken second and
Chamberlain third. When we had finished figuring we could hardly
believe our eyes. The score stood:
Preston 40
Maynard 40
Chamberlain 28
The two-mile run, the last event, would decide the meet. And there
was Beckner.
Of course we had not lost faith in Carl, but big, strong Beckner
was clearly the freshest man on the field, and he would take a lot of
beating. We had to have first place to win the meet. Second and
third would not be enough, unless Fuller of Chamberlain got first. In
that case the championship would go to the school that took second.
We did not know whether Fuller was going to run or not, and we
were pretty anxious to find out. Only Bobby seemed cheerful.
“We can beat them,” he said. “Why, Carl can make circles round
Beckner, and as for Fuller, that mile run used him all up.”
“Maybe you will do something yourself, Bobby,” said I.
“I shouldn’t mind trying, but I guess they’re not going to let me
enter. I didn’t show up very well in the mile; you can’t go in and set
the pace and have anything left for the end. I came in fifth, though.”
Bobby really looked pleased with himself.
“All out for the two-mile run!” called the clerk of the course, and we
went down to the start. John Blake was looking blue.
“It’s a long way out to Ohio,” he said ruefully. “And the roads are
dusty, too.”
“Fuller’s going to run, isn’t he?” I asked.
“Yes, and I don’t know whether that makes it better for us or
worse.”
“Answer to your names!” called the clerk.
There were seven entries there: Carl and Bannet of our school,
Beckner, Green and another Maynard runner, and Fuller and one
other Chamberlain fellow.
“On your marks!” called the starter.
“Hold on, please,” said our coach. “We have another man coming.
Where’s Hart?”
“Here,” said Bobby, stepping out from the group beside the track.
“Get in there,” said the trainer.
So Bobby, much pleased, took his place in the second line.
“Get ready!” said the starter.
“Set!” Then the pistol popped and they were off.
For the first mile and a half a two-mile race is generally rather
uninteresting; but when the meet depends on it, that is different. We
turned and watched the runners jog round the turn and come along
the back stretch.
When they had covered a quarter of the distance, Fuller was no
longer dangerous. He was running in short strides and had dropped
back to seventh place. At the end of the first mile the runners were
strung out all round the track. Green was making the pace. Behind
Green was Beckner, running with a fine long stride, and almost
treading on Beckner’s heels was Carl. Carl was not quite so pretty a
runner to watch as the man in front of him.
Ten or twelve yards behind Carl ran Bannet; Bobby was following
close. A third Maynard runner and Fuller were disputing sixth place.
A long way behind them the last man, a Chamberlain chap, was
lagging along. And that was still the order when the sixth lap began.
Beckner alone seemed untired. Carl’s cheeks were white, and had
two spots of crimson in them. Bannet was looking pretty well used
up, but Bobby seemed not yet fagged and hung on to Bannet
closely. He had never tried himself to any extent in the two miles, but
I thought that he was doing better than he had done in the mile.
Getting tired of making pace Green swung aside and let Beckner
take the lead. Green fell in behind Carl, who was still treading in
Beckner’s tracks. Then the distance between the first group and the
second began to open; Bannet was tiring. For a while Bobby
regulated his speed by Bannet’s, but soon he went round outside
Bannet and passed him. That seemed to do Bannet good, for he
spurted and kept close behind Bobby all round the track. The third
Maynard man and Fuller were out of it for good by this time, and the
eighth man had left the track.
There were only two laps left now, and the shouting was pretty
continuous. Up at the head Beckner seemed to want Carl to take the
lead, but Carl refused. That cheered us considerably, for it seemed
to show that Beckner was weakening. Finally Green went to
Beckner’s rescue; but he almost pumped himself out in doing it, and
only set the pace for a few hundred feet, making it so slow that
Bobby and Bannet closed up half the distance between them and
Carl. Then Green fell out again and Beckner was once more ahead,
but Carl was holding on grimly.
So it was when they turned into the home stretch. The shouting
was tremendous now, for the spectators had left the stands and lined
up along the track.
“Last lap! Last lap!” shouted the judges.
We shouted to Carl to keep it up! And the Chamberlain people,
who liked us better than they liked Maynard, shouted the same thing.
Even Bobby and Bannet were applauded, and I shouted to Bobby to
go on and win.
On the turn Bannet stumbled and half fell, and lost several yards;
that seemed to take the heart out of him. When the runners turned
into the back stretch, Bobby was all alone a dozen yards behind
Beckner, Carl and Green.
About the middle of the stretch Beckner started to draw away from
Carl; but he only opened up about three yards before Carl was after
him. That put Green out of it. We saw him wabble once and then
throw up his arms and go over on the turf.
“Bobby’s going to get third place!” cried John. And, sure enough,
there was Bobby still running, and running strong.
But our eyes were on Carl and Beckner. They were having it out,
and as the turn began Carl crept up to the blue runner and tried to
edge past; but he couldn’t quite do it, and Beckner held the lead by a
few feet until they were in the straightaway and headed for the finish.
Then Carl actually got in front. A lot of us had gone halfway down the
track to meet them and were yelling ourselves hoarse.
“Come on, Carl! Come on! You can do it!”
The Maynard fellows were shouting to Beckner at the top of their
lungs. Carl was just about holding his lead, when suddenly he
staggered, got one foot on the raised board that runs along the
inside of the track, and fell on the cinders. He was up in a second
and running again, but he had lost three or four yards, was limping
and was plainly exhausted. And Beckner, none too fresh himself,
came on down the home stretch all alone, wabbling a bit, but
apparently an easy winner.
“Look at Bobby!” cried John. “Oh, look at Bobby!”
How he ever got there I don’t know, but there was that blessed
Bobby coming along only a few yards behind Beckner and gaining
on him at every stride. Now he had passed Carl; now he was almost
up to the Maynard man; and we were racing alongside, leaping and
shouting, while twenty yards ahead at the finish the judges were
leaning forward with excited faces and their fingers on the “stops.”
Stride by stride Bobby overhauled Beckner. Now he could have
touched him with his hand. Now he was running even. Now—
“Preston!” we cried. “Preston! Preston!”
And then there was the finish—Bobby flying down the turn and
Beckner falling into the arms of his fellows.
“Who won?” I shouted, dancing about in the crowd.
“Hart, by two feet!” said some one.
And John and I grabbed each other and danced.
“Hurray!” shouted John. “I don’t have to walk home!”
“Did you hear the time?” cried Poole, hitting me on the back. “Ten
minutes, thirty-six and four-fifths seconds! It breaks the record!”
We did an unusual thing that Spring. We elected a track-team
captain who was not a senior. His name was Robert Hart.
THE END
Transcriber’s Notes:
Printer’s, punctuation and spelling inaccuracies were silently
corrected.
Archaic and variable spelling has been preserved.
Variations in hyphenation and compound words have been
preserved.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PLAY
THAT WON ***
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.