AMJ041011
AMJ041011
AMJ041011
1 Introduction flow was studied in stainless steel and fused silica microchannels
This study involves an experimental approach to characterize at a range of diameters from 15 m to 250 m with results
the flow behavior of magnetorheological 共MR兲 suspensions in mi- indicating that there is no deviation from the conventional theory.
crochannels. Miniaturizing devices to the microscale and nano- The fluids that have been studied include water, oil, alcohol, and
scale levels is the current trend in many fields of study. The char- gas. Papautsky et al. 关4兴 suggested that a deviation from conven-
acteristics of fluid flow at the microlevel are not well understood. tional theory in these experiments may be related to measurement
The applications that could benefit from devices involving microf- errors, including the measurements of microchannel diameter 共D兲,
luid flow are not yet fully realized. There has been limited re- microchannel length 共L兲, pressure drop 共⌬P兲, viscosity 共兲, flow
search published on ER and MR fluid characteristics at the micro- rate 共Q兲, and surface effects.
scale level. When fully understood, this research could possibly be Experimental studies of MR fluids at microscale level introduce
extended to applications in microfluidic sensors and valves, rang- a new arduous challenge. Because MRFs are suspensions of mag-
ing from flow sensors and gas valves for gas pressure regulation, netically soft particles in liquids, such as, silicon oil or water, the
to complex microfluid handling systems for chemical analyses, flow behavior of MR fluid through microchannels is similar to a
consisting of pumps, valves, flow sensors, separation capillaries,
particle laden flow. Sharp and Adrian 关6兴 have shown that with
control of structures, and systems using small devices, reactors for
two phase particle laden flows, the ratio of the particle diameter to
modification and separation of biological cells, energy systems
such as mobile power sources, boundary layer control, coolers of the channel diameter must be about 1:3 for clogging to occur.
macrodevices, and propulsion engines. However, through the experiments that have been conducted in
One possible application of this research is in magnetorheologi- our studies with MR suspensions, this rule does not seem to hold
cal fluid 共MRF兲 microvalves. An advantage of a MRF microvalve true. Most theoretical studies of particle laden flow in microchan-
is the fact that there are no moving parts within the valve mecha- nels do not take into account the effects of particle agglomeration,
nism. A similar type of valve has already been experimented with settling, and tubing diameter transitions that can result in clog-
by researchers who have developed an electrorheological fluid ging. This challenge is compounded further if the size of the iron
共ERF兲 microvalve 关1兴. Since MRF has a higher yield stress than particles is less than 100 nm. Kormann et al. 关7兴 have shown that
ERF, a MRF microvalve could be designed that is highly efficient a nanobased MRF with 30 nm particle size exhibits an increase in
as compared with an ERF one. Klein and Guckel 关2兴 fabricated shear yield stress under an applied magnetic field that is an order
microcoils and microelectromagnets that can generate a magnetic of magnitude smaller than that of a typical MR fluid.
field as much as 1 T in small gaps with an input coil power of 5 Liu et al. 关8兴 proposed that a biocompatible and biodegradable
mW. MRF may be an effective form of cancer treatment. A simulated
The behavior of field-controllable fluids in dampers and other blood network was created using silicone tubes with diameters
devices at the macroscale have been well established 关3兴. With the ranging from 1.6 mm to 0.4 mm. MRFs were prepared using iron,
recent technological advances, especially in microscale and nano- iron oxide, and polystyrene embedded in iron oxide. The particle
scale levels, many researchers have focused on understanding the diameters ranged from 1.0 m to 2.3 m. Using human blood as
behavior of fluids’ flow at the microlevel. Papautsky et al. 关4兴 the carrier fluid, the above particles were added so that the particle
summarized some preliminary research, which produced a variety
volume fractions ranged from 0.5% to 2.0%. A permanent magnet
of results that deviate from the theoretical value of 64 for the
was used along a section of the tubing and the pressure drop was
product of the friction factor and the Reynolds number 共f Re兲.
measured at different flow rates and magnetic field strengths. The
The results from the experiments that have been conducted thus
results presented indicate that a pressure drop exceeding the 100
far are not consistent with each other. Experiments by Judy et al.
关5兴 and Sharp and Adrian 关6兴 have been carried out where liquid mmHg maximum, found in human arterioles, could be achieved.
The pressure drops were sufficient enough to starve a cancer tu-
mor by stopping the flow of blood to it.
1
Corresponding author. The research by Haghgooie et al. 关9兴 has shown that the col-
Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the umns formed by a MRF in microfluidic channels could be effec-
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received June 27, 2009; final manuscript
received December 10, 2009; published online April 14, 2010. Assoc. Editor: Nadine tive for DNA separation. The structure and dynamics of MRF with
Aubry. low particle volume fractions were analyzed to determine the ef-
Journal of Applied Mechanics Copyright © 2010 by ASME JULY 2010, Vol. 77 / 041011-1
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 1 Schematic of the experimental setup
fect of being constrained between two parallel plates. It was ob- centage of carbonyl iron powders were added, the resulting com-
served that the structure and dynamics of the colloids were highly position became too viscous to successfully flow through the mi-
dependent on the width of the channels. crochannels. With the requirements of this study in mind, an
This study focuses on the behavior of magnetorheological fluids experimental grease was synthesized that is able to accept the
flow through a microchannel. A special MRF, namely, MR grease, addition of large amounts of carbonyl iron powders while still
has been developed that will flow through a microchannel without maintaining its base viscosity. A summary of the composition of
clogging. The flow is controlled by injecting the MRF through the this base grease is as follows. Using PAO as carrier medium
microchannel via a stainless steel syringe at a controlled adjust- 共83.3% weight of grease兲, modified smectite clay 共12.6% by
able rate. The pressure drop of the MRF flow is measured across weight兲, and sorbitan monooleate 共4% by weight兲 were added to
the length of a tube with internal diameters ranging from 75 m the PAO and then mixed under a 500 rpm mixer for 1 h.
to 1 mm. A magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the micro- To prepare the MRG, the HQ series carbonyl iron powder 共CIP兲
channel MRG flow with a field strength ranging from 0 T to 0.56 from BASF was mixed in with the base carrier grease. This CIP
T. Results are obtained for pressure drop as a function of applied has an iron content greater than 97.5% and was selected based on
magnetic field and flow rate. its mechanical and geometric properties. The average particle di-
ameter of the HQ powder is 1.1 m, with 90% of the particles
2 Experimental Study being less than 2.2 m in diameter. This is roughly one-third of
One of the major challenges in the proposed study is to develop the size of the particle diameters of the powders used in commer-
a MR fluid 共with high percentage of solid loading兲 that flows cial MRF today. The particles are also relatively hard in compari-
through microchannels and produce a significantly controllable son to typical MRF carbonyl iron powders, which results in re-
pressure drop across the microchannel. Our preliminary results duced particle breakdown and increased durability of the MRG.
demonstrated that one can easily pass fluids with nanosized par- The experimental setup to drive the MRF through microchan-
ticles, such as ferrofluids, through microchannels. However, nano- nels requires some specialized fluid handling equipment that is
particles do not produce significant increase in pressure drop un- typically only found in the biomedical industry. A schematic of
der an external magnetic field. In addition, when traditional MRFs the setup is shown in Fig. 1. A Harvard Apparatus PHD-4400 high
were used, where the particle size is in the 1 – 10 m range with pressure programmable syringe pump controls the flow of the
large weight percentage of solid loadings, the flow through the MRF through the microchannel. Mounted in the pump is a Har-
microchannels would be plugged before any variation in pressure vard Apparatus 8 ml or 2 ml stainless steel syringe, which dis-
drop could be measured. It is clear that the successful MRF for penses the fluid from the syringe at a single or step changing flow
this experiment has to have 共a兲 micrometer size iron particles with rate.
high solids loadings, and 共b兲 a base fluid that prevents these par- At the exit of the syringe is a Swagelok fitting that connects a 5
ticles from settling or agglomeration at the entrance to or inside cm length of 1.6 mm 共1/16 in.兲 outside diameter 共OD兲 stainless
the microchannels resulting in blockage. steel tubing to the syringe. At the end of that tubing is a stainless
The first attempts in this effort involved using commercially steel tee connected inline with port fittings. The tee is used to refill
available carbonyl iron micropowders in silicon oil or poly-alpha- the syringe when all the MRG has been dispensed through the test
olefin 共PAO兲, with surfactants added to prevent particle agglom- section of the microchannel. After the tee, a second 5 cm length of
eration. None of these samples were able to flow through a the stainless steel tubing connects to a pressure gauge tee. The two
100 m fused silica test microchannel. The next step was to syn- pressure transducers used in this experiment are Cole Parmer
thesis iron oxide Fe3O4 particles similar to those found in ferrof- models 68074-18 and 68074-20 with 3000 and 5000 psi 共gauge兲
luids, but with larger particle sizes. Several of these samples suc- pressure ranges, respectively. All stainless steel tubing leading up
cessfully flowed through the test microchannel with added to the pressure gauge tee has an internal diameter of 1 mm. The
polymer surface modifiers; however, because the particle size was microchannel test sections are attached at the exit of the pressure
still relatively small and the solids loading percentage in the fluid gauge tee. Midway along the 5 cm length of microchannel, a
could not be increased above 10–20% without agglomeration oc- controllable magnetic field is applied, with an electromagnet, to
curring, the effect of the applied magnetic field on the yield stress study the change in pressure drop when the field is applied. The
was minimal. electromagnet is constructed from silicone core iron with 1100
A reverse micelle synthesis process was used to produce differ- turns in the coil. The MRF exits the microchannel at atmospheric
ent phases of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Heat treatment pressure and is collected in a container for reuse.
was used to control the phases of the iron oxide. Magnetic particle Three different tubing materials, with different surface rough-
agglomerates with sizes averaging 200 nm were able to be pro- ness values, were used for the experiment to quantify the effect
duced by this process, and then, washed and added to hydraulic that the surface roughness had on the pressure drop across the
oil with a surfactant 关10兴. Unfortunately, the results were unsuc- microchannel test sections of the same nominal inside diameter
cessful as microchannel blockage and insignificant MR effects 共ID兲. Tubing used for the microchannel test sections varied be-
from an applied magnetic field were observed. tween nominal IDs of 1 mm 共1000 m兲 and 0.075 mm 共75 m兲.
A breakthrough came when a grease based carrier medium was Type 316 stainless steel and polyether ether ketone 共PEEK兲 tubing
used instead of the traditional oil. Commercially available grease was used for the larger ID microchannels while PEEK and
was found to flow through microchannels, but when a large per- PEEKsil™ was used for the smaller ID microchannels.
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Table 1 SEM/AUTOCAD estimated microchannel internal
diameters
Estimated ID 共m兲
Nominal ID
共m兲 316 stainless steel PEEK PEEKsil™ 共fused silica兲
冏 冏
resulting MRG was loaded into the syringe pump using a second
disposable syringe or a grease gun connected to the inline tee du
before the pressure transducer. The pressure drop measurements rz = y + 共2兲
dr
were recorded using one of two methods.
共1兲 For the larger diameter channels, the pump was pro-
grammed with step changing flow rates at 10–30 s dwell
intervals. As the MRG was dispensed, the pressure drop
was recorded with no magnetic field applied to the test
microchannel for baseline data, and then the test was run
again at each of applied magnetic fields listed in Table 2.
Figure 2 shows an example of the data collected using this
method.
共2兲 For the smaller diameter microchannels, the syringe pump
was set to deliver a constant flow rate. The pressure drop
0.25 0.19
0.5 0.32
1.0 0.45
2.0 0.56 Fig. 3 Raw pressure drop data recorded for PEEK microchan-
nels with a constant MRG flow rate of 0.125 ml/min
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 4 Shear stress versus shear rate for the MRG using a Fig. 6 Shear stress and viscosity versus shear rate for UNR
plate-plate measurement method MRG with no magnetic field applied using a cone-plate mea-
surement method
rz = y + k 冏 冏
du
dr
n
共3兲 applied magnetic field, which is equivalent to a Newtonian fluid
viscosity for MR fluid with no magnetic field applied. L is the
where rz is the shear stress, y is the shear yield stress, du / dr is channel length, and c is a parameter that ranges between 2 and 3,
the shear rate, and is the plastic viscosity for the Bingham depending on the ratio of ⌬PMR / ⌬Pvis 关11兴. Equation 共4兲 is valid
model. k and n are fluid index parameters for the Herschel– if the MRF behaves as a Newtonian fluid in the absence of a
Bulkley model. In both Equations du / dr is 0 when rz ⱕ y. The magnetic field as indicated by the Hagen–Poiseuille ⌬Pvis term on
shear yield stress as a function of the applied magnetic field can the right for the pressure drop of laminar flow through a pipe.
be obtained by extrapolating a curve of the data points in Fig. 4 From the results of the MRG under a cone-plate shear rheometer
using either of these two models to the intersection of the Y axis measurement shown in Fig. 6, it is observed that the MRG has a
where the shear rate is zero. non-Newtonian behavior in the off-state; thus, the ⌬Pvis term in
Using the Bingham model in Eq. 共2兲, the values for the shear Eq. 共4兲 would not be appropriate to model the viscous pressure
yield stress were calculated and plotted for comparison against the drop.
values for the Lord MRF-132AD fluid as a baseline. The results in By comparing the change in pressure drop with the change in
Fig. 5 indicate that the MRG has a shear yield stress approxi- flow rate one can determine if one of these models are appropriate
mately 25% less than that of the MRF-132AD for a given applied to characterize the base grease. In Fig. 7, it can be seen that the
magnetic field. This is expected since the iron particles in the data points for each microchannel diameter closely approximate a
MRG are approximately three times smaller than those in the straight line representing the plastic viscosity in Eq. 共2兲. This
MRF-132AD; therefore, a smaller magnetic attraction force be- demonstrates that the flow behavior of the base grease material
tween particles is generated when the magnetic field is applied. through microchannels still conforms to the macroscale Bingham
The total pressure drop for an MRF flowing through a channel pipe flow theory.
is often approximated by When the magnetic field is applied along the microchannel,
there is approximately 6 mm 共0.24 in.兲 of length that will be
128QL cyL influenced by the field, as shown in Fig. 8. This includes the
⌬P = ⌬Pvis + ⌬PMR = + 共4兲
D4 D fringing effects of the magnetic field through the gap in the mag-
net poles, which has an estimated effect out to 1/2 the gap width
where ⌬Pvis is the viscous pressure drop component, and ⌬PMR is
around the perimeter of the poles. To obtain a qualitative compari-
the pressure drop due to the shear yield component induced by the
son of the influence that the applied magnetic field has on the
applied magnetic field. D is the diameter of a circular channel, Q
microchannel pressure drop, the pressure drop due to the viscous
is the volumetric flow rate, and is the plastic viscosity with an portion of the MRG flow that is outside of the 6 mm area of
Fig. 5 Shear yield stress versus applied magnetic field for Fig. 7 Change in pressure drop versus change in flow rate in
comparing MRG to Lord MRF-132AD using the Bingham model PEEKsil microchannels for the base grease
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 8 Approximate length of influence from the magnetic field compared with the total microchan-
nel length. Dimensions are in millimeters „inches….
influence is subtracted from the total pressure drop that was mea-
sured. This was accomplished by multiplying the total viscous
pressure drop measured, when no magnetic field was applied, by
dp
dz
=A
4 y
D
+ 冉
3n + 1 8Q
n D3
冊 n
4k
D
,
Rp
R
ⱕ 0.5 共7兲
the ratio of the 6 mm active field length to the 50 mm total length where
of the microchannel. This value was then subtracted from the total 3n + 1 3 共3n + 1兲共1 − n兲
pressure drop measured at the same constant flow rate for the A= −
different magnetic field strengths applied. The remaining pressure 2n + 1 16 共2n + 1兲2共n + 1兲
drop was then divided by 6 mm to obtain an average pressure Equation 共7兲 is used to model the dp / dz data obtained by the
gradient 共dp / dz兲 versus flow rate for the length of microchannel experiments. The values for y, n, and k can be obtained by from
through the applied field. the experimental data. The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm is
A theoretical expression has been developed using the commonly used for this type of problem to minimize the sum of
Herschel–Bulkley Eq. 共3兲, in combination with the momentum the squares between the measured data and the model as follows:
equation for laminar flow 关12兴
兺 冉 dz 冊
m
2
dp dp
dp 共rrz兲 F= measured − 共8兲
r =− 共5兲 dz
theory
dz r i=1
and the equation for volumetric flow rate in circular channels The genfit function in MATHCAD uses this algorithm and was
冕
utilized for the process of obtaining results by manually adjusting
R
n to find the set of values for y and k to fit each microchannel
Q = 2 urdr + R2pu p 共6兲 tested. The results are shown in Figs. 10–23. In some cases, the
Rp
best fit curve resulted in a negative value for y. Since this is not
where R is the radius of the channel, u is the flow velocity in the physically possible, the value for n was adjusted to provide posi-
channel, and R p and u p are the radius and velocity of the fluid plug tive values for y that are reasonable, when compared with the
that develops for non-Newtonian fluid flow in circular cross sec- results from the plate-plate shear rheometer in Fig. 4. The values
tions, respectively. A representation of this geometry and nomen- for the parameters in Eq. 共7兲 are presented in Table 3.
clature is shown in Fig. 9. The results from Figs. 10–23 indicate that the flow can be mod-
By expanding Eqs. 共5兲 and 共6兲 through nondimensional analysis eled using the Herschel–Bulkley model in Eq. 共7兲 with good re-
and Taylor series expansions, a closed-form expression of the sults. This also indicates that the MRG flow still follows the con-
Herschel–Bulkley constitutive model for the pressure gradient in
circular cross sections is found as follows 关12兴:
Fig. 9 Flow of MR suspension through a circular cross sec- Fig. 10 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 1008 m
tion †3,13‡ stainless steel microchannel
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 11 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 985 m Fig. 14 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 511 m
PEEK microchannel stainless steel microchannel
Fig. 12 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 787 m Fig. 15 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 523 m
stainless steel microchannel PEEK microchannel
Fig. 13 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 780 m Fig. 16 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 250 m
PEEK microchannel stainless steel microchannel
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 17 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 270 m
PEEK microchannel Fig. 20 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 142 m
PEEKsil™ microchannel
ing shear rate in post yield. In Table 3, it is shown that the general
tendency is that n increases as the microchannel diameter de- in Figs. 10–23, as the area between the pressure gradient results
creases. Most likely this is due to the fact that the MRG flow rate when the magnetic field is applied and at the off-state curve with
range, in the smaller diameter microchannels, does not cover a no magnetic field. The dynamic pressure drop can also be mea-
large of a span as with the larger channels. This is due to the sured by a ratio of the pressure drop due to the MR effect ⌬PMR
limitations of the experimental setup with regards to maximum to the pressure drop due to the viscous component ⌬Pvis men-
working pressure and force ratings on the components. tioned in Eq. 共4兲. From the experimental data, there are two points
The dynamic force range or dynamic pressure drop range is that can be concluded. The first is that the ratio of ⌬PMR / ⌬Pvis
often used to characterize the performance of the MR effect in a decreases with increasing flow rate. This is illustrated by compar-
device. The dynamic pressure drop range is presented graphically ing measurements on the right side of the figures to those on the
Fig. 18 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 158 m Fig. 21 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 134 m
stainless steel microchannel PEEK microchannel
Fig. 19 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 149 m Fig. 22 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 114 m
PEEK microchannel stainless steel microchannel
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 23 Pressure gradient versus flow rate across 123 m Fig. 24 Yield stress versus magnetic field strength for large
PEEK microchannel stainless steel and PEEK channels
left for the same set of measurement data. In the latter case, duced to represent the irregular shape of the microchannels, and a
⌬PMR / ⌬Pvis is approximately two times greater. Second, Herschel–Bulkley macroscale pipe flow theory is also employed
⌬PMR / ⌬Pvis decreases with decreasing microchannel diameter. to utilize the experimental data to obtain the model parameters.
This can be probably explained by an increasing effect of the Figures 24 and 25 present the shear yield stress from Table 3 as
viscous forces, and a decreasing MR effect at the smaller micro- a function of the applied magnet field for some of the large and
channels due to the reduction in the active fluid volume. The ratio smaller microchannels. Values for both stainless steel 共rough兲 and
of ⌬PMR / ⌬Pvis ranges from about 5, in the smaller microchannels PEEK 共smooth兲 material types are shown for comparison. In Fig.
at the highest flow rates, to 30, in the larger channels with the 24, the results indicate that the PEEK channels with their rela-
lowest flow rates tested. It is worthy to note that all these phe- tively smooth surface roughness have a smaller shear stress than
nomena of the MRG flow through microchannels in the tested that of the corresponding stainless steel channels. This is consis-
ranges can be explained well by Eqs. 共4兲 and 共7兲, which are de- tent with the previous findings 关13兴. In Fig. 25, the effect of the
rived from continuum mechanics models. surface roughness on the smaller diameter microchannels is not
It has been shown that the surface roughness has significant easy to discern. The stainless steel and PEEK materials have a
effect on the flow of MRF 关13兴. In general, by increasing the shear yield stress that is within the margin of error for the mea-
surface roughness in a channel, the measured pressure drop of surements. The PEEKsil™ microchannel exhibits a yield stress
MRF flow will increase for a given applied magnetic field. By that is roughly half the value of the yield stress of the other two
using a modified Mason number 共a ratio of the viscous forces to materials at the maximum applied magnetic field. These figures
magnetic forces兲 in combination with the friction factor, an ex- suggest that surface effects may diminish as the microchannels get
pression has been developed that can be used to express the pres- smaller. This may be related to a decreasing MR effect for the
sure drop for various surface roughness values 关13兴. smaller active fluid volume, or the increasing viscous forces act-
Ideally, this would be studied by the pressure drop for micro- ing on the fluid. Additionally, these results could be dependent on
channels with the same diameter. Because the measurements of the fluid properties of the MRG.
the microchannel diameters tested show a significant difference The fitted experimental data for the MRG flowing in micro-
between them for different materials, it is difficult to study the channels using Herschel–Bulkley model include three parameters
surface roughness effect. In this study, through careful processing 共n, k, and y兲. Among the three parameters, the yield stress y is
of the experimental data, the problems related to the measurement crucial in modeling the MR material flow when subjected to an
variations in the microchannels and pressure drops were over- applied magnetic field. Therefore, the fitted value of the yield
come. As stated previously, the hydraulic diameter has been intro- stresses are compared with that of the yield stress obtained using
1008 SS 0.31 3.7 8.8 14.0 17.8 191 552 955 1236 1263
985 PEEK 0.31 2.0 3.9 6.3 7.6 159 720 1313 1694 1986
787 SS 0.46 4.4 9.6 15.5 19.8 59.3 103 186 242 286
780 PEEK 0.44 3.0 6.3 11.3 13.7 65.3 176 356 425 521
511 SS 0.51 3.4 8.9 15.8 21.0 42.7 79.0 106 129 137
523 PEEK 0.52 4.8 8.3 12.6 15.9 35.9 50.4 105 150 173
250 SS 0.65 4.9 11.5 18.3 23.6 10.8 15.2 21.1 26.7 25.0
270 PEEK 0.64 4.5 9.7 14.9 18.1 14.2 12.2 28.0 36.9 49.6
158 SS 0.64 4.1 9.6 14.4 18.7 6.6 9.6 12.9 15.6 16.8
149 PEEK 0.74 4.2 8.9 15.3 18.9 4.1 5.0 7.0 7.3 9.3
142 PEEKsil™ 0.64 2.8 4.9 6.6 8.4 12.2 20.2 36.3 51.1 65.2
134 PEEK 0.67 2.5 6.4 10.2 13.1 6.6 14.7 19.2 25.7 29.4
114 SS 0.64 3.2 7.5 11.7 16.0 7.9 13.8 21.0 32.8 31.0
123 PEEK 0.69 3.5 6.4 10.0 12.5 5.8 8.9 14.5 18.7 21.7
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
With the MRG, flow could be initiated and then random clog-
ging would occur, during either the off or the on 共magnetic field
applied兲 states. It is believed that the clogging could be due to one
of several phenomena, including:
• contamination from dust, lint, and other foreign matter in
the MRG
• structured particle formation within the microchannel form-
ing a wall or dam to block the flow
• particle-particle interaction at the entrance or along the mi-
crochannel
• inadequate mixing of the base grease and/or the base grease
with the carbonyl iron micropowders
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
The pressure drop of the flow for this MRG was measured 关3兴 Wang, X., and Gordaninejad, F., 2007, “Magnetorheological Materials and
Their Applications: A Review,” Intelligent Materials, M. Shahinpoor and H.-J.
across microchannels that were 5 cm in length with nominal in- Schneider, eds., Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp. 339–385.
ternal diameters ranging from 1 mm to 75 m. A magnetic field 关4兴 Papautsky, I., Ameel, T., and Frazier, A. B., 2001, “A Review of Laminar
was applied midway along the microchannels by an electromag- Single-Phase Flow in Microchannels,” Proceedings of the ASME International
net. The applied magnetic field strength was varied between four Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New York, NY, Nov. 11–
16, pp. 1–9.
different values from 0.19 T to 0.56 T to study the increase in 关5兴 Judy, J., Maynes, D., and Webb, B. W., 2002, “Characterization of Frictional
pressure drop due to the MR effect on the flow. The results indi- Pressure Drop for Liquid Flows Through Microchannels,” Int. J. Heat Mass
cate that there is good agreement between the experimental data Transfer, 45, pp. 3477–3489.
and the macroscale theory, using the Herschel–Bulkley model for 关6兴 Sharp, K., and Adrian, R., 2001, “Shear-Induced Arching of Particle-Laden
Flows in Microtubes,” ASME IMECE2001/MEMS-23879, Vol. 2, ASME, New
flow through a circular cross section. The microchannel materials York.
included stainless steel, PEEK, and fused silica with different val- 关7兴 Kormann, C., Laun, H. M., and Richter, H. J., 1996, “MR Fluids With Nano-
ues for surface roughness. It was observed that the effect of the Sized Magnetic Particles,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 10, pp. 3167–3172.
surface roughness on the pressure drop diminishes as the micro- 关8兴 Liu, J., Flores, G. A., and Sheng, R., 2001, “In-Vitro Investigation of Blood
Embolization in Cancer Treatment Using Magnetorheological Fluids,” J.
channel diameter decreases. Magn. Magn. Mater., 225, pp. 209–217.
关9兴 Haghgooie, R., Li, C., and Doyle, P. S., 2006, “Experimental Study of Struc-
Acknowledgment ture and Dynamics in a Monolayer of Paramagnetic Colloids Confined by
Parallel Hard Walls,” Langmuir, 22, pp. 3601–3605.
The authors are thankful for the funding provided by the Na- 关10兴 Sinha, K., 2005, “Large Scale Synthesis of Crystalline Magnetic Nanopar-
tional Science Foundation. The assistance from the Polymer Sci- ticles,” MS thesis, Material Science and Engineering Department, University
ence and the Material Science and Engineering students at the of Nevada, Reno.
关11兴 Carlson, J. D., Catanzarite, D. N., and St Clair, K., 1996, “Commercial
University of Nevada, Reno for sample preparation is warmly Magneto-Rheological Fluid Devices,” Proceedings of the 5th International
appreciated. Conference on Electro-Rheological Fluids, Magneto-Rheological Suspensions,
and Associated Technology, W. Bullough, ed., World Scientific, Singapore, pp.
20–28.
References 关12兴 Wang, X., and Gordaninejad, F., 1999, “Flow Analysis of Field-Controllable,
关1兴 Yoshida, K., Kikuchi, M., Park, J.-H., and Yokota, S., 2002, “Fabrication of Electro- and Magneto-Rheological Fluids Using Herschel-Bulkley Model,” J.
Micro Electro-Rheological Valves 共ER Valves兲 by Micromachining and Ex- Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 10共8兲, pp. 601–608.
periments,” Sens. Actuators, A, 95, pp. 227–233. 关13兴 Gordaninejad, F., Kavlicoglu, B., and Wang, X., 2005, “Friction Factor of
关2兴 Klein, J., and Guckel, H., 1998, “High Winding Density Micro Coils for Mag- Magneto-Rheological Fluid Flow in Grooved Channels,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B,
netic Actuators,” Microsyst. Technol., 4, pp. 172–175. 19共7–9兲, pp. 1297–1303.
Downloaded 04 May 2010 to 171.66.16.45. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm