Full download test bank at ebook textbookfull.

com

Designing Developing and

Facilitating Smart Cities Urban
Design to IoT Solutions 1st Edition

CLICK LINK TO DOWLOAD

https://textbookfull.com/product/designing-
developing-and-facilitating-smart-cities-
urban-design-to-iot-solutions-1st-edition-
vangelis-angelakis/

textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Sustainable Urban Planning Vibrant Neighbourhoods Smart

Cities Resilience 1st Edition Bott

https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-urban-planning-
vibrant-neighbourhoods-smart-cities-resilience-1st-edition-bott/

Advances in smart cities : smarter people, governance

and solutions 1st Edition Arpan Kumar Kar

https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-smart-cities-
smarter-people-governance-and-solutions-1st-edition-arpan-kumar-
kar/

Developing IoT Projects with ESP32: Discover the IoT

development ecosystem with ESP32 to create production-
grade smart devices 2nd Edition Vedat Ozan Oner

https://textbookfull.com/product/developing-iot-projects-with-
esp32-discover-the-iot-development-ecosystem-with-esp32-to-
create-production-grade-smart-devices-2nd-edition-vedat-ozan-
oner/

Smart Cities: Introducing Digital Innovation to Cities

Oliver Gassmann

https://textbookfull.com/product/smart-cities-introducing-
digital-innovation-to-cities-oliver-gassmann/
A Future of Polycentric Cities: How Urban Life, Land
Supply, Smart Technologies and Sustainable Transport
Are Reshaping Cities Cole Hendrigan

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-future-of-polycentric-cities-
how-urban-life-land-supply-smart-technologies-and-sustainable-
transport-are-reshaping-cities-cole-hendrigan/

Green Technologies and Infrastructure to Enhance Urban

Ecosystem Services: Proceedings of the Smart and
Sustainable Cities Conference 2018 Viacheslav Vasenev

https://textbookfull.com/product/green-technologies-and-
infrastructure-to-enhance-urban-ecosystem-services-proceedings-
of-the-smart-and-sustainable-cities-conference-2018-viacheslav-
vasenev/

Reinventing an Urban Vernacular: Developing Sustainable

Housing Prototypes for Cities Based on Traditional
Strategies 1st Edition Terry Moor

https://textbookfull.com/product/reinventing-an-urban-vernacular-
developing-sustainable-housing-prototypes-for-cities-based-on-
traditional-strategies-1st-edition-terry-moor/

Designing Cognitive Cities Edy Portmann

https://textbookfull.com/product/designing-cognitive-cities-edy-
portmann/

Green and Smart Technologies for Smart Cities 1st

Edition Pradeep Tomar (Editor)

https://textbookfull.com/product/green-and-smart-technologies-
for-smart-cities-1st-edition-pradeep-tomar-editor/
Vangelis Angelakis · Elias Tragos
Henrich C. Pöhls · Adam Kapovits
Alessandro Bassi Editors

Designing,
Developing,
and Facilitating
Smart Cities
Urban Design to IoT Solutions
Designing, Developing, and Facilitating Smart
Cities
Vangelis Angelakis ⋅ Elias Tragos
Henrich C. Pöhls ⋅ Adam Kapovits
Alessandro Bassi
Editors

Designing, Developing,
and Facilitating Smart Cities
Urban Design to IoT Solutions

123
Editors
Vangelis Angelakis Adam Kapovits
Communications and Transport Systems, Eurescom GmbH
Department of Science and Technology Heidelberg
Linköping University, Campus Norrköping Germany
Norrköping
Sweden Alessandro Bassi
Alessandro Bassi Consulting
Elias Tragos Juan les Pins
Institute of Computer Science France
Foundation for Research and Technology—
Hellas
Heraklion
Greece

Henrich C. Pöhls
Institute of IT-Security and Security Law
University of Passau
Passau
Germany

ISBN 978-3-319-44922-7 ISBN 978-3-319-44924-1 (eBook)

DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44924-1
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016948601

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or
for any errors or omissions that may have been made.

Printed on acid-free paper

This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature

The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface

The trend of cities leveraging Information and Communication Technologies

(ICT) to sustain their growth and offer additional services to citizens became
mainstream in the past few years. This has been increased with the emergence of
technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), that allow a digital representation
of physical environments. Many predictions are made regarding the way IoT will
change everyone’s lives. To understand the implications and instead of making
more predictions, this book combines in-depth explanations of the latest results
from IoT research and technology with societal, economical and legal perspectives.
This interdisciplinary approach makes this book unique as it covers a broad
spectrum of smart city aspects. We believe that this broad view is necessary to
maintain citizens’ well-being and privacy in a “Smarter” city.
We have not found many reference books covering the topic of smart cities from
motivation to enabling technologies and use cases in such a broadened approach.
The book provides a comprehensive guide to selected topics of research, both
ongoing and emerging, in the broad area of ICT enablers for smart cities, using a
pedagogical approach. Technologically, the areas of cloud computing and IoT are
considered highly relevant to be understood in their limitations as well as in their
offerings to successfully build an ICT enabled smart city. The contributions to this
book come from worldwide well-known and high-profile researchers in their
respective specialties; selected topics covered in this volume are related to
assumptions (Chaps. 1–4), enabling technologies (Chaps. 5–10), and experiences of
solutions designed for smart cities. (Chaps. 11–14). We have prepared this book
hoping that it proves itself to be a valuable resource, dealing with a broad spectrum
of smart city aspects. And we hope that it will be a helpful source and reference for
instructors, researchers, students, engineers, scientists, city managers, and industry
practitioners in this exciting new field.

v
vi Preface

Book Overview and Features

The book is organized in 14 chapters, each written by well-recognized experts in

the area covered. Chapters have been integrated in a manner that renders the book
as a supplementary reference volume or a textbook for use in both senior under-
graduate and graduate courses on smart cities. Each chapter has an expository, but
also a scholarly or survey style, on a particular topic within the book scope.
Chapter 1 proposes an analysis of past urban developments in an attempt to
predict how future developments may look like, and how the technology could be
used to overcome current spatial cities’ barriers towards a sustainable vision for
future generations, on both social and economical levels.
Chapter 2 investigates who the assumed user in the contemporary smart city is.
Building a critical framework using examples from contemporary smart cities
projects, it reflects on the characteristics of the assumed user, and which users may
have been unwittingly overlooked during design and development.
Chapter 3 discusses how the onlife manifesto principles can be turned into
guidelines for smart city frameworks and IoT development leveraging experience
from research and innovation projects.
Chapter 4 identifies and analyzes some of the expectations and possible
long-term effects of big data and the Internet of Things. Without reducing the
importance of success stories achieved so far it points out areas that need further
attention in the future, such as security at large and proposes to trigger a wider
discussion about the impact on society and unforeseen side effects.
Chapter 5 recognizes that it is quite common in the last few years for large cities
to form strategic agendas for “smartification” through IoT technologies. It provides
an overview of the challenges, a methodology, and shortly summarizes the latest
attempts for manifesting security and privacy protection already in the IoT archi-
tectures for smart city environments.
Chapter 6 provides an overview of the challenge of personal data protection
within smart cities and shows how to formulate technological requirements that
meet legal requirements. It also shows how to address the challenge to implement
Privacy by Design and gives an example on how to achieve data minimization in a
smart transport scenario.
Chapter 7 gives a primer on general information security, its main goals, and the
basic IoT security challenges in the Smart City. Built upon the basic IT security
goals for confidentiality, integrity, and availability, this chapter additionally
addresses security and privacy problems. Thereby it awards recognition how the
latter may be a key acceptance factor of smart city ICT solutions and introduces the
reader to the technical privacy goal of unobservable communication.
Chapter 8 gives an overview of the main IoT-based communication technologies
which can enable services for smart cities, further commenting on the main
advantages, disadvantages and open challenges involved in applying each tech-
nology to the smart city ecosystem.
Preface vii

Chapter 9 presents the Cloud-IoT architectural vision, as a key service provi-

sioning technology for the smart city. The chapter exposes open challenges and
points to a set of different research initiatives that aim to address them. A promising
architecture for enabling Cloud-IoT services in smart cities is presented together
with a case study that reveals the cloud’s high potential in the context of smart
cities.
Chapter 10 introduces a framework encompassing FIWARE and the IoT-A to
develop innovative IoT platforms and services, and include generic IoT devices that
are independent of connectivity modes and are not coupled to specific IoT
protocols.
Chapter 11 gives an overview of different mobility data sources and their
characteristics and describes a framework for utilizing the various sources effi-
ciently in the context of traffic management.
Chapter 12 focuses on the energy sector advocating how ICT and signal pro-
cessing techniques can be integrated into next generation power grids towards
increased effectiveness in terms of electrical stability, distribution, improved
communication security, energy production, and utilization. The chapter also fea-
tures big data analytics for demand response and serious games as a tool to promote
energy-efficient behaviors from end users.
Chapter 13 is about each building getting “smarter” to serve the inhabitants
needs better. It takes the approach to incorporate user involvement, which has been
successfully applied in many areas, to the engineering process of smart buildings.
Smart buildings will no longer be built just as a shelter for people and a more user
driven building sector suits the smart city.
Chapter 14 is motivated by the need to restructure healthcare services through a
platform to empower patients to actively engage in the management of their
well-being. The chapter discusses challenges of developing smart home technolo-
gies for health and care breaking down the various facets of the home and the
diversity of its residents.
Overall this book has a set of unique features:
• It is designed, in structure and content, with the intention of making it useful at a
broad range of learning backgrounds and levels.
• The book’s authors are prominent academics, researchers, and practitioners,
with solid experience and exposure on the domain.
• The authors of this book are distributed in a large number both of disciplines and
countries and most of them are affiliated with institutions of worldwide repu-
tation. This gives this book a strong international flavor.
• The authors of each chapter have attempted to provide a comprehensive bibli-
ography of their topic, which should provide the reader with at least a good
starting point to further dig into each area covered.
• Throughout the chapters of this book, core research topics from a wide range of
technologies and science and engineering domains have been covered; making
the book particularly useful for city managers and practitioners working directly
viii Preface

with the practical aspects behind enabling the technologies for city
smartification.
• We allowed the authors, who are experts in an interdisciplinary range of fields,
to provide in-depth inside to their views on the topic from their different dis-
ciplines and backgrounds; our goal was to transport this expertise rather than
trying to achieve perfect homogeneity, but we have attempted to make the
different chapters of the book as coherent and synchronized as possible.

Intended Audience

We have attempted to design the overall structure and content of the book in such a
manner that makes it useful for all learning levels. The book is written to primarily
target students, of a broad spectrum of disciplines. This includes students of senior
undergraduate and graduate levels, in the broad range of skills employed towards
turning a city smarter. A secondary audience for this book is the researcher and
practitioners’ community, in academia, the ICT and IoT industry, and city planning.
To this end we have taken into consideration the need for getting insights not only
of the practical significance of the topics, but also need to discover how this scope
of knowledge and the ideas are relevant for applications and technologies enabling
for smart cities.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply thankful to the 70 authors of the 14 chapters of this book, who have
worked hard to bring this unique resource forward for helping the students,
researchers, and smart cities community at large. We note that as the individual
chapters of this book are written by different authors, the responsibility of the
contents of each of the chapters lies with the concerned authors.
We would like to thank Springer and Ms. Mary James, Senior Editor, who
worked with us on the project from its inception, for her professionalism and
support. We also thank Mr. Brian Halm, who tirelessly worked with us and helped
us in the publication process.

Norrköping, Sweden Vangelis Angelakis

Heraklion, Greece Elias Tragos
Passau, Germany Henrich C. Pöhls
Heidelberg, Germany Adam Kapovits
Juan les Pins, France Alessandro Bassi
Contents

Part I Motivation/Scene Setting

1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective . . . . . . . . . . 3
Alessandro Bassi
2 Who Is the Assumed User in the Smart City? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Katherine Harrison
3 Making Onlife Principles into Actionable Guidelines
for Smart City Frameworks and #IoT Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Nenad Gilgoric, Christine Hennebert, Srdjan Krco, Carmen Lopez,
Ignacio Maestro, Colin Ő Reilly, Michele Nati, Antonio Skarmeta,
Rob van Kranenburg, Nathalie Stembert and Alberto Serra
4 Factoring Big Data into the Business Case for IoT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Anastasius Gavras

Part II Technologies
5 Designing Secure IoT Architectures for Smart
City Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Elias Tragos, Alexandros Fragkiadakis, Vangelis Angelakis
and Henrich C. Pöhls
6 Privacy and Social Values in Smart Cities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Leonardo A. Martucci, Simone Fischer-Hübner, Mark Hartswood
and Marina Jirotka
7 Security and Privacy for the Internet of Things
Communication in the SmartCity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
Ralf C. Staudemeyer, Henrich C. Pöhls and Bruce W. Watson
8 IoT Communication Technologies for Smart Cities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Matteo Cesana and Alessandro E.C. Redondi

ix
x Contents

9 Cloud Internet of Things Framework for Enabling Services

in Smart Cities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Dimitrios Kelaidonis, Panagiotis Vlacheas, Vera Stavroulaki,
Stylianos Georgoulas, Klaus Moessner, Yuichi Hashi,
Kazuo Hashimoto, Yutaka Miyake, Keiji Yamada
and Panagiotis Demestichas
10 Future Internet Systems Design and Implementation: Cloud
and IoT Services Based on IoT-A and FIWARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
Stelios Sotiriadis, Kostantinos Stravoskoufos
and Euripides G.M. Petrakis

Part III Use Cases

11 Traffic Management for Smart Cities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
Andreas Allström, Jaume Barceló, Joakim Ekström, Ellen Grumert,
David Gundlegård and Clas Rydergren
12 Smart Grid for the Smart City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Riccardo Bonetto and Michele Rossi
13 The Significance of User Involvement in Smart Buildings
Within Smart Cities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
Mervi Himanen
14 SPHERE: A Sensor Platform for Healthcare in a Residential
Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
Przemyslaw Woznowski, Alison Burrows, Tom Diethe,
Xenofon Fafoutis, Jake Hall, Sion Hannuna, Massimo Camplani,
Niall Twomey, Michal Kozlowski, Bo Tan, Ni Zhu, Atis Elsts,
Antonis Vafeas, Adeline Paiement, Lili Tao, Majid Mirmehdi,
Tilo Burghardt, Dima Damen, Peter Flach, Robert Piechocki,
Ian Craddock and George Oikonomou
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
Contributors

Andreas Allström Communications and Transport Systems, Department of Sci-

ence and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping,
Sweden
Vangelis Angelakis Communications and Transport Systems, Department of
Science and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping,
Sweden
Jaume Barceló Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Universitat
Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Alessandro Bassi Alessandro Bassi Consulting, Juan les Pins, France
Riccardo Bonetto University of Padova, Padua, Italy
Tilo Burghardt Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Alison Burrows Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Massimo Camplani Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Matteo Cesana Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria,
Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Ian Craddock Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Dima Damen Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Panagiotis Demestichas Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus,
Piraeus, Greece
Tom Diethe Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Joakim Ekström Communications and Transport Systems, Department of Sci-
ence and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping,
Sweden

xi
xii Contributors

Atis Elsts Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Xenofon Fafoutis Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Simone Fischer-Hübner Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
Peter Flach Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Alexandros Fragkiadakis Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for
Research and Technology—Hellas, (FORTH-ICS), Heraklion, Greece
Anastasius Gavras Eurescom GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
Stylianos Georgoulas University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Nenad Gilgoric DunavNet, Novi Sad, Serbia
Ellen Grumert Communications and Transport Systems, Department of Science
and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping, Sweden
David Gundlegård Communications and Transport Systems, Department of
Science and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping,
Sweden
Jake Hall Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Sion Hannuna Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Katherine Harrison University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Lund
University, Lund, Sweden
Mark Hartswood University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Yuichi Hashi Hitachi Solutions East Japan, Ltd., Sendai, Japan
Kazuo Hashimoto Waseda University Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Kokusai Kogyo Co.,
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Christine Hennebert CEA, Grenaoble, France
Mervi Himanen Relate Partnership, Digital Living International Ltd, Espoo,
Finland
Marina Jirotka University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Dimitrios Kelaidonis Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Pir-
aeus, Greece
Michal Kozlowski Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Rob van Kranenburg Resonance Design/Council, Tilburg, Netherlands
Srdjan Krco DunavNet, Novi Sad, Serbia
Carmen Lopez University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Contributors xiii

Ignacio Maestro University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Leonardo A. Martucci Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
Majid Mirmehdi Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Yutaka Miyake KDDI R&D Laboratories Inc., Fujimino, Japan
Klaus Moessner University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Michele Nati Digital Catapult, London, UK
George Oikonomou Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Colin Ő Reilly University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Adeline Paiement Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Euripides G.M. Petrakis Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering,
Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece
Robert Piechocki Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Henrich C. Pöhls Institute of IT-Security and Security Law, University of Passau,
Passau, Germany; Department of Informatics and Mathematics, University of
Passau, Passau, Germany
Alessandro E.C. Redondi Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e
Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Michele Rossi University of Padova, Padua, Italy
Clas Rydergren Communications and Transport Systems, Department of Science
and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping, Sweden
Alberto Serra sociotal.eu, Guildford, UK
Antonio Skarmeta University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Stelios Sotiriadis Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Technical
University of Crete, Chania, Greece
Ralf C. Staudemeyer Institute of IT-Security and Security Law, University of
Passau, Passau, Germany; Information Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellen-
bosch, South Africa
Vera Stavroulaki Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Piraeus,
Greece
Nathalie Stembert sociotal.eu, Guildford, UK
Kostantinos Stravoskoufos Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering,
Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece
Bo Tan Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
xiv Contributors

Lili Tao Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Elias Tragos Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and
Technology—Hellas, (FORTH-ICS), Heraklion, Greece
Niall Twomey Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Antonis Vafeas Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Panagiotis Vlacheas WINGS ICT Solutions, Athens, Greece
Bruce W. Watson Information Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch,
South Africa
Przemyslaw Woznowski Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol,
UK
Keiji Yamada Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Ni Zhu Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
 Part I
Motivation/Scene Setting
Chapter 1
Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical
Perspective

Alessandro Bassi

1.1 Smart or Dumb, What Is a City?

The concept of “smart city” is often used implying that the reader has a clear and
common notion of what it means. However, in the current literature it is very hard
to find a precise definition. What is even more interesting, it is not so easy to find a
precise definition of what a city is.
In France, the French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Research
(INSEE) uses as a criterion the number of inhabitants: a City is an agglomeration
of 2000 or more people. As all arbitrary numbers, this one is not exempt by critics,
as just a growing number of inhabitants allow to pass from rural to urban zone,
while they are clearly two different realities. Furthermore, every country has different
limits: while in Denmark, for instance, an agglomeration of 250 people is enough,
in Egypt we need 11,000 people, while in Japan 30,000. In the United States the
number set is 2500. The United Kingdom has a different way to define a settlement
in a city: only the King (or Queen) has this power, and the appellation is given without
a specific criterion, although usually it matches the diocesan cathedrals.
In some cases a different concept is used. The definition of urban unity is based
on the habitat continuum, not more than 200 m between 2 constructions and at least
2000 inhabitants.
The definition of Urban or Industrial Zones respond to a deeper concept that takes
into consideration the level of daily migration between workplace and home, the
percentage of the population not involved in agricultural work and the number and
size of industrial, commercial, and administrative buildings. The dynamics of these
spaces is linked to the proximity of one or more urban areas.
It is possible to notice, therefore, that the notion of city itself does not have a
unique administrative definition. Furthermore, the concept of city goes beyond its

A. Bassi (✉)
Alessandro Bassi Consulting, 3 Avenue de Cannes, 06160 Juan les Pins, France
e-mail: [email protected]

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 3

V. Angelakis et al. (eds.), Designing, Developing, and Facilitating Smart Cities,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44924-1_1
4 A. Bassi

mere administrative domains, and evokes a way of living which is typical of a cer-
tain amount of population living in close proximity. We would then use the adjective
urban rather than the word city in order to avoid the administrative definitions and
rather concentrate on the lifestyle and way of living typical of a large number of
people living in proximity. In this context, urban refers not only to the mere admin-
istrative facts but, more important, to a specific culture and mentality.

1.1.1 City Growth

The urban population is growing constantly. Looking at simple numbers [1], it’s easy
to get convinced and to understand the amplitude of the phenomenon. In 1960, the
population living in cities was around 1 billion; in 1986, it doubled, and in 2005
was 3.2 billions. The increment of urban population is growing constantly, and con-
stantly quicker. Following this pattern, our planet will see in 2030 5 billion urban
people, leaving rural areas more and more inhabited, as the world population growth
is estimated around 1 % per year, while the urban population is growing at a rate of
1.8 %.
According to UN data, the percentage of population living in urban environments
cross the 50 % in 2007. It is interesting to notice that the strongest part in this evo-
lution will happen in the regions of the world which are currently underdeveloped.
Within these zones, in 1975 there were 815 urban areas, while in 2005 the number
grew to 2252. In the same time period, in the more developed areas, the growth has
been limited (from 701 to 898). In percentage, we have 2.2 yearly for the first ones
and 0.5 for the second one.

1.1.2 European Trends

In Europe, the urbanization trend is very important: more than 75 % of the global
population lives in towns, using 80 % of resources and contributing 85 % to the Euro-
pean GDP. Demographically speaking, when we refer to Europe as the old continent,
we can see that the expression is rather correct: in 2009, the median age of the pop-
ulation was 40.6 years, and forecasts show that it should reach 47.9 in 2060.
From a macro-economic point of view, the EU 28 region is the world first eco-
nomic power. The GDP of EU countries generated more than 16 Trillions USD in
2008, with an average GDP per person above 30,000 USD. However, these indica-
tors hide huge disparities. The GDP can vary by one order of magnitude, between
Estonia and Germany for instance. Differences between EU countries can be found
at any level of economic dimensions, from unemployment rate to public deficit or
inflation rate.
1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective 5

Growth of the European population (in the EU 27 countries) grew by 100 mil-
lion, from 400 to 500 million, between 1960 until 2009. Until the eighties, the demo-
graphic growth was mainly due to the rate of natural increase. However, the ratio is
constantly decreasing since the 1960s, and the lowering birth rate and increasing life
expectancy will directly translate into a sensible increase of the average age of the
population. It is possible to observe, though, that starting from the nineties, inter-
national migrations became the main cause of population growth. This factor can
be a solution against the average aging, with particular regards to issues related to
the workforce, as most migrants are young adults. In 2010, 9.4 % of the population
living in the EU was born outside Europe, and by 2060 it is expected that at least
one third of the EU population will have an ancestor born outside Europe, while an
even bigger percentage will constitute the active part of the society. While the 2015
migrant crisis showed that the EU countries are still struggling to integrate important
migratory trends, demographic shows that the smooth integration into the workforce
is likely to be the only viable solution to keep a certain level of prosperity and social
benefits.

1.2 Different Theories on Smart Cities

The European cities are all different; but they are facing similar challenges and are looking
for shared solutions [2].

A domain where the research is particularly active during this past few years is at the
crossing between technology and society. The current world situation calls for a pro-
gressive but radical change. This evolution has been smoothen by the policies of the
European Union, but today we see a quick acceleration of tis trend because of eco-
nomical and environmental concerns. Therefore, the future of our towns is dependent
to the way we will manage to work out the economical, social, and environmental
developments in synergy.
Within this context, it seems interesting to state the ambitions of the EU for the
coming decade. The strategy called “Europe 2020 [3]” aims to revive the economy
and is the development of a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. These priorities,
which are mutually reinforcing, must allow to the Union and its Member States to
ensure high levels of employment, productivity and social cohesion. This should
happen by relying on greater coordination between national and european policies.
In other words, each Member State will be required to follow the European directives
and support the common objectives through an harmonization of local legislation.
Given the growing euro-skepticism, the adoption of common policies by member
states might not be obvious.
The main actions are the following:
∙ Smart growth, developing an economy based on knowledge and innovation.
Between now and 2020, an estimated 16 million more jobs will need a high level
6 A. Bassi

of qualification, while the low-skilled asset demand is expected to fall by 12 mil-

lion. The improvement of the initial training is paramount—as well as the means
to acquire and develop new skills during a career.
∙ Sustainable growth, which promotes a better efficiency energetics as well as a
greener and more competitive economy.
∙ Inclusive growth, which supports high employment rate and a strong social and
territorial cohesion.
The targets for 2020 are

∙ Three quarters (75 %) of the population between 20 and 64 years should be

employed, (the average of the EU 27 is now 69 %).
∙ Reduce the poverty rate of 25 %, which means 20 million people out of poverty.
∙ Reduce to less than 10 % the population between 18 and 24 years leaving school
without a diploma, and raise to at least 40 % the percentage of the population
between 30 and 34 year with an higher degree.
∙ 3 % of European GDP invested in Research and Development, combining private
and public sectors, which is a point higher than the current rate (compared to 2.6 %
of GDP invested in R&D in the USA and 3.4 % in Japan).
∙ objective “20/20/20” climate change, a 20 % reduction of greenhouse gas emis-
sions, compared to 1990 levels, raising 20 % the energy efficiency and reach 20 %
of energy production through renewable sources.

All these measures should allow the creation of 1 million jobs in Europe. These
objectives are linked and, at least theoretically, they are reinforcing each other.
Progress in education matters will improve the capabilities of the labor pool, reduc-
ing the risk of impoverishment. On top of it, the increase in the average skill level
will fuel the growth of a knowledge economy based on innovation, research and
development. The European economy will have the chance of improving its com-
petitiveness, creating wealth and jobs, closing a virtuous circle—at least, on paper.
Furthermore, all these improvements will bring the opportunity to develop a fully
“green economy,” making our societies more environmental-friendly, and therefore
more profitable, as the side effects of a development not following environmentally
sustainable practices are likely to result in very expensive containment measures.
One of the themes which is common to all these dimensions is technology. Much
of the progress made in the recent past in the field of Information Technology and
Communication (ICT) allow an holistic design for the city of the future, which is
often linked to the concept of Smart City. Within the huge number of essays on this
topic a few elements are recurring. They will serve as a basis for identifying key
concepts of urban form of the future.
In general way, the conceptualization of Smart Cities follows from what we
explained earlier on. The economic and technological changes that relate to global-
ization constitute the fabric of this domain. Cities find themselves facing the need to
combine economic competitiveness and urban development, in a sustainable manner
and style, preserving—or by creating—an outstanding quality of life. The concept
of Smart City brings together all major current concerns.
1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective 7

Fig. 1.1 The 6 characteristics of a smart city (Source european smartcities)

However, there is a specific issue while studying this theme. The literature on this
new city concept comes for the most part from engineers or urbanists. In general, for
humanities and social sciences this theme does not seem to resonate, and it is not
yet a common object of research. As a matter of example, the diagram in Fig. 1.1,
quite popular, is from the website “European Smart Cities.” The research team was
constituted by members of the Regional Centre of Science of the Vienna Univer-
sity of Technology, the Institute for Research on housing and urban mobility of the
Technical University of Delft and the Department of Geography of the University of
Ljubljana.
The basic model, found in many publications, promote a taxonomy with 6
domains, 31 sub-groups, and 74 indicators.
The result is a rather technocratic vision of the city, which is -at best- hard to apply.
While it can represent an idealtypen, it is hard if not impossible to apply in the real
world. It is a holistic approach that pretends to understand everything and explain
and master everything through a mathematical formula. However, understand and
manage are two very different things: although knowledge and reason are the foun-
dation of the modern world since the eighteenth century, this taxonomy goes too far
in the direction of the Reason.
Science and its applications are supposed to give The Answer to everything. This
assumption might not be fundamentally wrong if science was replaced by knowl-
edge and wisdom; however, it is impossible not to notice the return of a positivist
conception with regards to analysis of the world aspects. The point is not to con-
test the importance that scientific observation and factual analysis can bring; but one
thing is to base the reasoning on the facts, one is to develop a research as a disci-
ple of A Comte (1798–1857). It seems like the “hard science,” where everything
can be quantified, and that define social laws as immutable, is taken as the corner-
stone of every discussion and possible development. In this vision, the smart city
concept goes between Supreme Theory and Abstracted Empiricism, two derivatives
that CW Mills attributed to the sociology of the 1950s. The Supreme theory claims
that purely formal studies can provide an analytical framework to the study of soci-
ety. The abstract empiricism suggests that knowledge production is not based on a
8 A. Bassi

solid methodological basis, but on statistical results or surveys. This conceptual atro-
phy leads to forget or underestimate fundamental reflections that are sometimes the
very essence of the studied object.
A similar density is missing from the concept of smart city itself. The basic model
lies on a theoretical vision of the society and its relationships. The characteristics
that constitute the smart city essence, according to the model above, are the reflec-
tion of what is considered the best in all different domains. However, this vision is
clearly biased. In a constructivist paradigm, all social activity—including, obviously,
sciences—are elaborated in a particular historical and cultural context. The scientific
domain is not a collection of data on real world, which can be applied at any time
and anywhere. Rather, it is a discussion built on a certain number of actors (the
“scientific community”) in a precise historical, technical, political, social, economi-
cal moment.
As a consequence, while the scientific origin of a concept is a socially valid
assumption, it needs to be put into perspective. We cannot agree more that an
absolute relativism, that postulates that all knowledge, scientific or not, has the same
level of importance and truth, is truly negative, but we sustain an approach that can
keep a different perspective on the same objective data. While the notion itself of
smart city is the result of ICT research, based on certain economic assumptions,
nothing is stopping from considering human and social sciences to bring a strong
contribution to this subject and feed it with a different set of considerations. Under-
standing the cities of the future with a socio-historical approach will definitely help
in fixing some epistemological shortening. This allows, from one side, to define the
borders of the current urban shape, on which the future cities will be built. On the
other one, to draw attention on the social and logic relationships that are character-
istic of the urban way of living. Without the full understanding of these perspective,
any theoretical and practical construction in this domain is bound to fail, as it would
be a mere exercise of style.

1.3 A Step Back: Urban Sociology

any town is a socio-economic product

Le Corbusier, probably the most influential urbanist and architect in our era, had a
very precise mantra. It stated that “the city must allow people to live, to work, to
move, and to have fun.” While it may sound logical, this urban utopia helped a tech-
nocratic vision of the city: very often, the urban space is conceived as a functional
organization in which different sectors have specific and complementary function-
alities (areas focused on residential, touristic, commerce, industrial …). However,
this “clearly defined zone” politics, such as separation between living and working
activities, is not always—if not, seldom—a success.
In other words, the peripheral and residential areas of towns are de facto on the
outskirts of the economical and social dynamics of cities. What media usually call
1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective 9

“urban violence” has roots in these areas. A good number of social problems are, first
of all, spatial problems. Ideally, it would be better to avoid building such areas, that
tend to be segregated from the rest. Social integration of a town has to go through a
mix of activities and spaces, and therefore be the opposite of Corbusier’s functional
town. The zoning and independence of areas should be replaced by a more organic
vision of quarters where different spaces would be inter-dependent and multifaceted.
As Jacques Donzelot [4] says, “that social problems are concentrated in certain parts
of the urban fabric prove that there is a problem in the town but not of the town.”
In any case, the vision of the “urban issue” as explained above is not new, as the
heart of that analysis is based on the wrongdoings of the functional urbanism. Urban
issues are linked with the loss of quality life following the submission of the urban
fabric to the logic of production.

1.3.1 The Heritage of the Urban Issue

In general, social issues in town are perduring even in our post-industrial economy,
not based any longer on production of goods. We have therefore to upgrade the classi-
cal urban social issues, linked to the industrial town context. It is though very impor-
tant to refresh this classical conception before moving beyond it.
Both process of industrialisation and urbanization are to be considered. Western
towns are developed around an administrative and commercial center. Max Weber
conceptualised in a very clear way the genesis of the urban shape in the western
world. According to this german sociologist, the emergence of the urban phenom-
enon goes hand in hand with the advent of legal rational power, based on a bureau-
cratic apparel. His taxonomy of towns is based on five factors of urban cohesion.
The first and foremost of these factors is the economy: the heart of towns is the
marketplace. A town does not exist if there is not any regular exchange of goods,
and those are an essential part of the habitants existence. Weber distinguishes the
towns where the production or the usage of goods is paramount; respectively, they
base their income on industry on one side, and on services and commercial activities
on the other. This distinction today seem anachronistic, as the European economy is
mostly post-industrial, and the highest part of the value creation is on activities linked
to the tertiary sector and not any longer to the production of goods.
The second factor is the security. Any town, as a marketplace, would be insignifi-
cant if it could not assure protection. The ideal kind of transformation of the western
town is the “fortress town.” This unified continuum of a safe, secure and commercial
place guarantees both the commercial and the military peace, which are necessary
conditions for the long-lasting of this organizational form.
A third factor is freedom. Weber also believes that the city air makes people free.
This freedom is first of all applicable to properties.
The forth point is the brotherhood. Any city inherits from the city state ideal.
This has five characteristics: fortifications, market place, a tribunal, specific laws
10 A. Bassi

and associations, allowing an independent administration. Therefore, any citizen is

a member of a brotherhood: of place, of right, and of goods.
As a counterpart, the citizen must be able to defend himself from the city, which
induced a interdependency between the social layers constituting an urban contin-
uum. This relationship drives a fifth and last factor: the legitimacy conflicts. As the
interdependency relation is a necessity for the functioning of the different parts of a
city, it can also be a theater for social fights and conflicts, having as a main focus the
legitimacy of the power and of the possession of the resources. The management of
a city is usually the business of a very small number of elected people. Furthermore,
corporations try to claim the legitimacy of their work according to some rationale,
more often than not economic.
This is often linked to the fact that the industrialisation process is often the cause
of urbanization. The development of large industrial areas brings as a necessity the
expansion of the urban population, draining a huge number of the population from
rural areas. This massive population increase brought a development of the urban
shape, both regarding the density and the space.
The social consequences of this development are a piling up of heterogeneous
populations.
The appearance of social issue is natural within this context. The once admin-
istrative and market centers became industrial and popular. At the same time, con-
flicts linked to work conditions and survival are brought into the cities. Social issues
became urban issues. Working classes became dangerous classes, and the original
urban population, once upon a time composed only by the noble and middle-class, is
afraid of this heterogeneity and all the problems they bring. The undesirable effects of
this concentration of people started to be perceived; hygiene worries became closely
linked to cities. Therefore, the trend at that time was to isolate the working sections
of town from the administrative ones and put the workers under the direct control of
the patronage.
The transformation of Paris made by Haussmann is a clear example of the above-
described trends. The new laying out of the center of Paris bring a specific social,
political, hygienic and aesthetic perspective. The objective is to unlock the town
and to make it a safer place, through the creation of large boulevards and pushing
certain classes outside the center; this is also functional of making the city more
monumental, showing a clear representation of the running power.
This logic of moving the working class away from the center of cities had been
followed for a long time. After World War 2, the necessity to re-construct cities
in Europe fast, in large quantities and in a modern way, in order to have an econ-
omy of scale, was paramount. The developments of that era were not only the result
of a necessity—the need of housing—with a strong constraint—a fragile economy:
they were presented as modern jewels, and meant to unify different social classes.
Besides, these new housing were extremely comfortable (in terms of bathrooms,
central heating, lifts, . . . ) in comparison to old buildings.
1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective 11

Yet, very soon it became evident that these kind of habitat had several problems.
In 1973, for instance, France stopped all construction of large housing sets, as they
were considered far from the expectations of the inhabitants and promoting an active
segregation, as this housing complex were build in the outskirts of large towns.
Several researches showed that a relatively heterogeneous population changed
within a few years, reducing to a mainly low-income one. This is mainly due to the
distance from the urban center and the difficulty of getting there: whoever could, left
the suburbia for relocating in a more convenient place, and the low cost of housing
drove the ones that could not afford to be in a more central location. When the first
issues with unemployment rose, these areas were the worst hit, as the population was
composed almost exclusively by low-qualified workers.
Therefore, the majority of urban issues in the western world are linked to this
historical trend to separate the different classes, and a fortiori of the segregation that
follows.
The concept of “civil society,” bearing its own power separated from the state,
rises from social movements which are the effect of the tensions due to the separa-
tion. The process of industrialization and urbanization led to the creation of “urban
society” which, according to H. Lefebvre, draws its essence from key elements of
the historic city: the centrality, the public space, the street. Praxis—or practice of
the city—that is an effect of it, cannot be assimilated to other perspectives. On the
contrary, it takes all these different viewpoints and transforms them all. Through this
and the “right to the city,” Lefebvre argues that urban society can survive and reverse
the industrial era that created it. According to his work, urban planning hides the cap-
italist strategy in which the user of a city disappears in favor of its market value; the
user is therefore marginalized vis-a-vis of a consumer. The mercantile vision, though,
would necessarily lead to the extinction of sociability in favor of market exchanges.
This eminently political perspective is clear from this text: “[...] We had to denounce
urban planning both as a mask and as instrument: mask for the State and political
action, instrument of interests hidden in a precise strategy. Urbanism does not seek
to shape the space as a work of art, neither for technical reasons. Urbanism shapes a
political space” [5].
From a larger perspective, the urban problems covers not only what happens in
a city but “a set of actions and situations typical from everyday’s life strictly the
progress and characteristics of which are depending by the general social organiza-
tion” [6].
In other words, certain life or social conditions are intrinsically urban. As well,
social practices such as the culture or the consumer habits are at least in part explain-
able by the social position of a person.
Now, how these problems have an impact on the development of new technolo-
gies, or, conversely, how the technological development can help in mitigating the
outstanding issues that the urbanization is developing since centuries?
12 A. Bassi

1.3.2 Spatial Distances Reflecting Social Differences

The phenomenon described beforehand is not new and even less unheard of. If we go
back to feudal times, social and spatial separations are flagrant. The political, eco-
nomic, administrative, and military kernel is concentrated in the fortress. Around it,
there are the market towns which, in exchange for a relative military and merchant
peace, can grow and prosper. While this example may seem too distant to be use-
ful, things did not really change in our era. During the industrial revolution, housing
estates were carefully built on the margins of bourgeois cities, as mentioned ear-
lier. Today, popular residential areas follow the same spatial logic. Whether we look
at ghettos in the US, banlieues in France, favelas in Brazil or periferie in Italy, all
countries are facing these social and spatial relegation.
But if the phenomenon is historically and geographically recurrent since cen-
turies, why there is a problem today? The answer is not in the forms of housing in
itself, but in the global society in which these forms are realized. Indeed, the polar-
ization of urban housing highlights a first problem of poverty and social exclusion.
To avoid getting lost in the maze of a comparative approach that would not bring
much to the analysis, we will develop briefly the French case. As already mentioned
above, in France urban problems are often related to the theme of the banlieues.
These habitat areas usually cover suburban complex and multifaceted realities. We
will not focus on the “typical” and recurrent trends, as the goal here is not to make a
case study. But in order to draw a general picture, without distorting reality, we need
to identify the elements that make these neighborhoods particular spaces. First of all,
these are areas of spatial concentration of social inequalities. This goes back to what
we have already mentioned on the polarization. Yet, other variables must be added.
Apart of the lower income, compared to other neighborhoods, banlieues concentrate
a younger than average population. In addition, there are more employees and work-
ers than elsewhere. Finally, the unemployment rate is often higher than the national
average. As an added statistical fact, there is a higher presence of immigrants, or
people that are culturally and/or by birth foreigners to the perceived French “ortho-
dox values.” This series of factors combined are leading to a delicate situation that
the French state is struggling to manage. Indeed, it is an aggregation of structural,
social, immigration, and urban planning problems, to the point that it became hard
to say if it is more a people’s problem or a spatial one. Anyway, it is a fact, sadly: the
situation is deteriorating. The concentration of social unrest in these places make the
ones who can, to leave these neighborhoods, weakening the diversity and its inher-
ent dynamics. According to Pierre Bourdieu, there is a close link between places and
social position. “The structure of social space is shown in the most diverse contexts,
in the form of spatial oppositions, the living space (or appropriate) working as a kind
of spontaneous symbolization of social space” [7].
In any case, this covering by the social to the spatial domain is more or less blurred
by an effect of naturalization. In other words, historical and social phenomena can
be understood as implicit in the very nature of things. Yet, this physical show of
social logics contributes to objectify these struggles among different social groups.
1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective 13

As well, conflicts are often linked to specific places, as different kind of profits are
associated with them. These can be about the location (close to scarce goods such as
cultural infrastructure, health, education …); position or rank (prestigious address
…); occupancy (size of the owned space). The social dimension permeates the rela-
tionship with the space. Indeed, possession of capital—economic, cultural, social,
or symbolic—determines the ability to dominate and own space, either physically or
symbolically.
Moreover, the stakes in terms of location is part of a twofold logic of being close
and moving far away. On one side, the search for proximity to rare and desirable
goods and services; and secondly with the distancing—or exclusion—of people and
unwanted things. Constitution of homogeneous groups based on spatial difference
became the norm, helped by the state and its politics.
This segregation is strengthened by a particular phenomenon, that J. Donzelot call
“affinity urbanism.” First of all, it is possible to observe an increasingly widespread
suburbanization. This implies that the city grows outside its historical functional lim-
itations. Second, as individual mobility increases, the link between a territory and a
population gets more loose. The weight of the neighborhood decreases and the resi-
dence becomes selective. The places where people choose to live are not functionally
related and prescribed as in the old industrial city. This process is gearing towards
a phenomenon, where the distance is chosen and selective, based on considerations
relating to lifestyle, entertainment or security. Clear examples of this trend are the
gated communities, where individuals benefiting from certain economic and social
resources choose to live in a “among-pairs-group” away from the global society,
often in a spatially separated area. For instance, in some countries, such as Brasil or
South Africa, it is common to see estates protected by concrete walls and security at
the entrance.
Without getting to this extreme point, the current problem of cities is to be split
between these antagonist ghettos logic. The result is a double polarization: towards
the “low-end,” where new forms of marginalization and inequalities take place, and
towards the “high-end,” where the cultural, economical and political powers tend to
unify and separate from the larger population.

1.4 Towards New Trends

The usage of digital technologies to enhance the quality and attractiveness of the
city, to provide services to the inhabitants and tourists and to improve operational
costs became a mainstream trend in this decade. In the recent past, there has not
been a single city that did not use the word “smart” for labeling some of their ini-
tiatives. However, how can the use of digitalisation impact the life of citizens, given
the sociological and historical perspective illustrated above?
14 A. Bassi

In any given city there we can distinguish three distinct factors:

1. Aspects that do not change, or evolve with a speed which is by far slower than
human life. It is the case of history, for instance, or geography, or climate. The
Coliseum is in Rome; the Statue of Liberty in New York. The average rainfall
in Tokyo in November is 100 mm; Marseille is on the sea, Stockholm is on an
archipelago, and Paris is on the Seine river. Now, while in course of centuries
this can change (Pisa, when founded, was on the sea, while today it is around 10
Km from the coast because of sediments brought by rivers), the pace is extremely
slow and we can consider these parameters are “stable.”
2. Aspects that change slowly, and require a lot of effort and commitment. Cultural
aspects, for instance, or major urban modifications. Jordaan district in Amster-
dam, for instance, was a few decades ago a working-class neighborhood; nowa-
days is arguably the most expensive area in Netherlands. Detroit population
dropped by 60 % since 1950, and 25 % since 2000. Always in Amsterdam, the
construction of the north-south underground line started in 2002, and it is sup-
posed to be finished not before 2018. Therefore, while these characteristics are
often slow to move, specific trends can have a strong impact on those, in particu-
lar social and economic trends tend to draw a different picture depending on the
historical period.
3. Aspects that can be changed easily. These aspects, which are often “cosmetic,”
may nevertheless have an impact on the quality of life in a specific town. Use of
NFC payments for public transport, for instance, or specific traffic restrictions,
or else laws allowing (or disallowing) specific behaviors like smoking in pub-
lic places. However, these hardly modify the structure of society and the spatial
issues as described above.

As discussed earlier, any city is a economical and social product. Urban spaces are
often conceived as a functional organization in which different areas have specific
functions (residential areas, commercial ones, industries, . . . ). This politic, however,
does not necessarily lead to good results. The city peripheries (hinterlands) are often
de facto on the margins of the city social and economical dynamics.
It is important to notice is that Smart City projects as they are often advertised are
addressing only the third category. A common example is a service which seems to
be widely used to indicate the smartness of a city: parking sensors with a dedicated
app showing the available space at real time. While the usefulness of such devel-
opments can be debated, and even positively argued, it does not tackle any of the
city issues at its roots, but rather promote a further digital divide exacerbating the
existing separation between different realities within the same city.
On the same line, some advertisement of these smart city projects are even clearly
showing their beliefs and their intentions. When we read headlines like this
Our Cities are rapidly becoming both more populated and more complex. Because of this,
people’s security needs are constantly changing. That’s why Hitachi is developing solutions
to keep people safe in their communities [8].
1 Looking at Smart Cities with an Historical Perspective 15

It is flagrant that—at least—some of these planned solution for smart cities do

not address the trend to ghettification, trying to solve historical problems, but rather
promote an even stronger segregation of inhabitants, keeping them safe in their com-
munities, not beyond …
In our opinion, digital technologies are extremely powerful as they virtualise the
notion of space. This can clearly overcome the spatial separation developed for cen-
turies, and allow a “brand new start” as the digital space add another dimension,
which is still mostly unchartered.
Furthermore, not all is lost. New trends in urban planning are focused on
environmental-friendly cities which are eco-sustainable, and several experiments are
sprouting, such as the vertical gardens or agricultural spaces within the city limits.
These urban utopias, fully belonging to the Smart Cities phenomenon, conceptualize
certain strong elements that could be the building blocks of the cities of tomorrow.
For instance, a breakage of spatial barriers: mixing agricultural spaces within the
urban territory will allow a different symbiosis between nature and urban society.
Relevant work in this area has been already made (by C.J. Lim, for instance).
Therefore, with a little imagination and hope, it is possible to consider this current
trends in a positive way. We briefly discussed about the fragmentation of society,
that transforms a city creating “self-segregation” zones based on attraction/repulsion
process. However, some current development allow people with a different logic, to
coexist and to share the same space. We are talking here about the eco-neighborhoods
that reconcile economy and ecology, and often also social links. This type of habitat
was very marginal and rural rather than urban until a short time ago. The passage
from the countryside to the city is due to an evolution of mentalities and legislations
favoring a more environmentally friendly living, This trend can therefore be seen as
extremely positive as it tackles not only the cosmetic aspects of cities, but leverages
technological advances developing a sustainable vision for future generations, on
both social and economical level.

References

1. UN: World Urbanisation Prospects (2005). http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/

WUP2005/2005wup.htm
2. EC: Towards a new culture for urban mobility (2007). http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/
urban/urban_mobility/green_paper/doc/2007_09_25_gp_urban_mobility_memo_en.pdf
3. EC: Europe 2020 strategy (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index.htm
4. Donzelot J (2009) La ville à trois vitesses. 2915456488. Editions de la Villette, Paris
5. Lefebvre H (1970) La revolution urbaine. 2070352161. Gallimard, Paris
6. Castells M (1975) Luttes urbaines et pouvoir politique. B018WKFA9K. La découverte, Paris
7. Bourdieu P (2015) La misere du monde. 2757851527. Points, Paris
8. Hitachi: Hitachi social innovation business (2016). http://www.hitachi.com/businesses/
innovation/solutions/index.html
Chapter 2
Who Is the Assumed User in the Smart
City?

Katherine Harrison

every city wants to be a smart city nowadays.

March and Ribera-Fumaz [14], p. 1.

Much hyped and funded to the tune of billions of dollars annually, smart city
projects claim to solve a range of contemporary urban problems including “air
pollution, traffic congestion and assisted living for the elderly” [20], thus providing
cleaner, safer, more energy-efficient cities of the future. Local and national gov-
ernments, technical companies and researchers are keen to emphasise how the
integration of various kinds of technologies (for example, big data analysis, Internet
of Things, wireless sensors and cloud computing) are key to tackling the challenges
posed by an ever-increasing urban population. The mission statement from the
recently created Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Smart
Cities Initiative, for example, reads:
we see an opportunity for IEEE to assist municipalities in managing this transition to
urbanization. This would include raising awareness of the benefits and downsides of
technology and help guide the appropriate uses of technology [23].

However, at the same time, smart cities have also been criticised for not taking
into account the needs/customs of local inhabitants or for increasing social divides.
This latter critique has been directed particularly at brand-new smart cities. Laveesh
Bhandari, for example, talking about the push to create more smart cities in India
such as the currently-under-construction Gujarat International Financial Tec-City
(GIFT), argues that such cities will potentially create “special enclaves” where only
the economically secure will be “enjoying the privileges of such great infrastruc-
ture” (quoted in [18]. Much of the current debate about smart cities in both popular
media and the social sciences thus centres round the role of the inhabitant. To what

K. Harrison (✉)
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
e-mail: [email protected]
K. Harrison
Lund University, Lund, Sweden

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 17

V. Angelakis et al. (eds.), Designing, Developing, and Facilitating Smart Cities,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44924-1_2
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
 *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE
TROUVELOT ASTRONOMICAL DRAWINGS MANUAL ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in
these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it
in the United States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of
this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept
and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and
may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the
terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of
the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research.
Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given
away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with
eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject
to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
 PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free

distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree
to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be
bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from
the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in
paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be

used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a
few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.
See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with
Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do
not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing,
performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the
work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of
course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™
mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely
sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of
this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its
attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without
charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™
work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or
with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is
accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
 This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived

from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the
United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must
comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted

with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a
part of this work or any other work associated with Project
Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this

electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you
provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work
in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in
the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing

access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
 copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™

electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may
be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except

for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph
1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner
of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF
WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE
TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL,
PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE
NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you

discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must
return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity
that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in
lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may
demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted
by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or
indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur:
(a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b)
alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project
Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.
It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and
donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help,
see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,

Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can
be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the
widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating

charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and
keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in
locations where we have not received written confirmation of
compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of
compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where

we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make

any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed

editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.