Research Proposal For Master's Program
Research Proposal For Master's Program
Research Proposal For Master's Program
Research Proposal
The Effect of Project Monitoring Practice on Project Success: A Case of West Guji
Zone Construction Office
BY:
PHAULOS TAMIRU
June, 2024
iii
I. LIST OF TABLE
Table 4.1: Work plan of the study ........................................................................................................... 21
Table 4.2: Estimated Study Budget ......................................................................................................... 21
i
II. LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 2.1: Conceptual framework of the study ...................................................................................... 14
ii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study
Project management has become essential for achieving organizational goals and delivering successful
projects across various sectors. Project management is an organized approach that utilizes appropriate
client involvement to meet sponsor needs and deliver expected business value (Wysocki, 2014). The
project management process consists of five process groups, including project monitoring and
controlling (PMI, 2013). Effective project monitoring practices are critical for ensuring projects are
completed on time, within budget, and to the required quality standards (De Marco, 2018).
In the construction industry, where projects are often complex and involve multiple stakeholders,
rigorous monitoring practices can significantly influence project outcomes (Bekele, 2019). Project
success is measured by completing on time, within the estimated cost, and to the required quality
(Tadewos et al., 2018). However, without a shared understanding of success factors, it is difficult to
effectively monitor and control project success (Yu et al., 2011).
Construction is an integral part of a nation's infrastructure and industrial growth (Beyer et al., 2021). In
Ethiopia, the construction industry has been a major development sector, with the country's vision to
become a middle-income country by 2025 (Okereke et al., 2019; African Development Bank Group,
2011). Effective project management, including monitoring, is required for construction projects to
meet their goals and plans (Menhas et al., 2019).
The West Guji Zone Construction Office, located in a region characterized by rapid development and
infrastructural expansion, provides a case for examining the impact of project monitoring on project
success. Monitoring involves the routine, methodical gathering and evaluation of data to determine
progress towards goals and targets (Budeli, 2020; Taghipour et al., 2020). Effective project monitoring
helps mitigate risks and enhance efficiency, which is crucial given the challenges faced by the
construction sector in Ethiopia, such as resource constraints, logistical issues, and regulatory hurdles
(Irfan et al., 2021).
Previous studies have highlighted the importance of project monitoring in improving project outcomes,
yet there is a lack of comprehensive research focusing on regional construction offices in Ethiopia. By
investigating the specific practices and outcomes within the West Guji Zone Construction Office, this
1
study seeks to fill this gap in the literature, providing insights into the effectiveness of current
monitoring practices and offering recommendations for enhancing project success in similar contexts.
Projects generally be unsuccessful because of poor planning, constant changes in the scope and
consequently deadline and budget, as well as the lack of monitoring practice (Josiah, 2019). Managing
successful construction projects will become a significant factor for project success and investment in
project management becoming integral to that success. However, many organizations still struggle to
achieve success with established plan. Numerous construction projects are not completed on schedule,
budget, and within scope, which is resulting in cost overruns and delays (Irfan et al., 2019). According
to Westerveld, (2003), nine out of ten-infrastructure projects will face cost overrun. Therefore,
monitoring process has in the recent become a necessary requirement for projects success.
Successful construction projects required to have optimum supervision and monitoring practice
(Mashele, 2019). According to Ethiopian Country Program Evaluation (ECPE) (2010), in Ethiopia,
most of the government organizations do not use effective project monitoring system in appropriate
manner for their projects in addition there are no tangible research conducted on the project monitoring
practice on construction projects. Now there is many construction, expansion and renovations projects
handled by West Guji zone construction group infrastructure planning and development office to meet
the organization strategic plan (school Architects & water shed partners’ architects, (2015). However, it
is evaluated that vast of the projects do not meet set plans.
Various problems contribute to variate the outcome of the projects from the planning process in
projects one of the factor being controlling and monitoring. Here after, this proposal will be assist in
2
having a comprehensive effect on the monitoring practice of the project success and the relation of
project progress tracking practice, project progress reporting practice, project change control practice
and project documentation or lesson learned practice with project success.
3
management, specifically within the context of regional construction offices in Ethiopia. The findings
will be valuable for policymakers, project managers, and stakeholders involved in construction
projects, enabling them to make informed decisions and adopt best practices.
Furthermore, the study’s recommendations will offer practical solutions for improving project
monitoring processes, potentially leading to better project outcomes, reduced costs, and timely
completion of construction projects. This can have a positive ripple effect on the overall development
and economic growth of the West Guji Zone. Additionally, the research will serve as a reference for
future studies, paving the way for further exploration into project management practices in similar
regional settings.
Nowadays, project management processes apply globally and across all business groups. Good practice
does not mean that the knowledge, skills, and processes described should always be applied uniformly
on all projects instead Good practice means there is general agreement that the application of project
management processes can enhance the chances of project success. For any project, the project
manager, in collaboration with the project team, is always responsible for determining which processes
are appropriate, and the appropriate degree of rigor for each process (Zakrzewska et al., 2022).
Project management process groups are the building blocks of every project management life cycle
(Zid et al., 2020). They are simply groupings of processes by project phases so all of the project
management life cycles (PMLC) are constructed from the five Process Groups known as Project
Management Process Groups defined by the Project Management Institute (PMI) as follows:
Initiating Process Group: This group holds the process of defining a new project or a new
phase of an existing project by obtaining authorization from the concerning party to start the
project or phase.
5
Planning Process Group: This group holds the process of establishing the scope of the project,
refine the objectives, and define the course of action required to attain the objectives of the
project.
Executing Process Group: This group holds the process of executing and completing the work
defined in the project management plan to satisfy the project specifications and meet its goal.
Monitoring Process Group: This group is a collection of process that track, review and record
the project progress and performance; identify areas which needs change and initiate the
corresponding changes.
Closing Process Group: Processes in this group are performed to finalize all activities across all
Process Groups to formally close the project or phase.
Even if the project management processes are presented as discrete elements with well-defined
interfaces they overlap and interact in practice. The use of the project management processes is
iterative, and many processes are repeated during the project. These five process groups have clear
dependencies, typically performed in each project, and highly interact with one another. The nature of
these interactions varies from project to project and may or may not be performed in a particular order.
The project management processes are linked by specific inputs and outputs where the result or
outcome of one process becomes the input to another process (Zid et al., 2020). The monitoring process
groups have the longest duration in terms of process interaction in a project. The main reason of this is
monitoring processes check all other process groups whether the project is healthy and will meet its
objectives (Shamim, 2022).
Beside this, the monitoring process group control changes and recommend corrective or preventive
action in anticipation of possible problems, Monitor the ongoing project activities against the project
management plan and the project performance measurement baseline, and Influence the factors that
could circumvent integrated change control or configuration management so only approved changes are
6
implemented. Continuous project monitoring help the project team to have insight on the health of the
project and identifies any areas requiring additional attention.
The Monitoring Process Group monitors the entire project effort rather than monitoring and controlling
only the work being done within a process group. Project monitoring activities take place in parallel
with project execution process group activities so that, while the project work is being executed, the
project is being monitored by implementing the appropriate level of oversight and corrective action.
The project is observed and measured regularly against the project plan to ensure that the project is
within acceptable variances of cost, schedule and scope, and that risk and issues are continually
monitored and corrected as needed. No amount of time and effort expended on planning, scheduling
and resource assessment will compensate for a lack of effective monitoring and a sound control system.
The purpose of this system is to ensure that the teams always have the information to make an accurate
assessment of what has happened and compare this with what should have happened according to the
plan.
Monitoring is a checking activity, talking to the team members and finding out directly how things are
going. While the project teams are physically constructing each deliverable, the project manager
undertakes a series of management processes to monitor and control the activities being undertaken.
Due to the inherently risky nature of software projects, constant monitoring is required to rectify any
event that may jeopardize the project. To monitor effectively, the project manager needs measurement
data.
The measurement data come from measuring processes and product. So, first project processes should
be planned such that their measurement can be taken, and secondly, it should be ensured that proper
measurements are taken. Only then effective project monitoring is possible. As stated on (Shamim,
2022), the monitoring process group are monitor project work, perform integrated work control, control
scope, control schedule, control schedule, control cost, control communication, control quality, control
stakeholder engagement, control risk, control procurement. From those processes, the main processes
of monitoring process group are: project performance tracking, project status reporting, change control
and documentation.
According to Zid et al., (2020), there are different types of status report. Those are:
Current period reports cover only the most recently completed period. They report Advance on
activities that were open or planned for work amid the period.
8
Cumulative reports contain the history of the project from the starting to the conclusion of the
current report period. They are more instructive than the current period since they appear
patterns in project progress.
Exception reports indicate variances from the plan. These reports are ordinarily outlined for
senior administration to perused and translate quickly.
Stoplight reports are a variation that can be utilized on any of the past report sorts.
Variance Reports as their name suggests, they report differences between what was planned and
what actually happened in a tabular form.
9
detached from plan (Kerzner, 2017). The project manager is responsible to produce and distribute all
the project documentation necessary to reflect any changes to the project plans and/or schedule.
It tracks the project progress towards achieving the stated objectives within project constraints;
identifies deviations; evaluates alternative courses of action and takes remedial actions (Rashed et al.,
2021). Project monitoring have gradually become key functions of project management as projects
grow bigger and more complex. It tracks, analyzes and reports progress with respect to objectives. With
this task stakeholders can understand the current state of the project, activities undertaken, and the
budget, schedule and scope forecasts.
According to Trzeciak et al., (2021), monitoring cycle comprises: plan making; plan implementing;
actual output monitoring and recording; actual output reporting, and finally; take corrective action on
the variations. This phase of the project enables to understand the project’s progress so that appropriate
corrective action can be taken when the project’s performance deviates significantly from the plan.
While project monitoring identifies deviation and put things back on track in traditional project
management, it identifies changes in the business environment and adjusts the plans accordingly in the
adaptive project management approach.
Project monitoring activities are carried out throughout the life of the project by taking measurements
that help the project team understand progress. This stage has an impact on the business objectives and
acceptance of the eventual project outcome in terms of quality. Since Monitoring process is
continuously performed through the life of the project; it oversees all the task and metrics necessary to
ensure that the approved and authorized project is within scope, on time and on budget, the project
proceeds with minimum risk to fail (Iriarte et al., 2020).
10
A continues monitor of key factor of a project helps the project team to have insight in to a project’s
potential success or failure as well It helps project manager to make important decision with verified
data and with evidence which can make the corrective action efficient to prevent the project from
failure, which means the project, become successful.
Project monitoring play a vital part in project management as well as the project manager’s decision-
making process, furthermore it helps the project managers and their team to foreseen potential risks and
obstacles that could spoil the project if it left unaddressed. Monitoring keep the management aware of
the problems, which crop up during the implementation of the project, by providing continuous and
regular reports about the project progress. Besides it supports and motivates the management to
complete the project within the budget, time and quality. The effective of monitoring enable the project
manager and project teams to identify the potential problems encountered during the course of the
project so that they can make Suitable corrective action to ensure the project is back on track and
eventually lead to project success.
There is no unique definition of project success so every project manager must develop their own
critical success factor (Calleam, 2020). Defining and agreeing upon project success criteria to make
project success measurable is a way to overcome the subjective interpretation of project success
(Müller et al., 2007) also Project success can be determined with achieving the success criteria defined
by the project team, end users, customers and stakeholders.
According to (Rodolfo, 2018), project success is gained when the project meets its objectives under the
pre-planned budget and schedule. Even if this evaluation criterion is common in many industries to
11
measure project success, it is different for the development projects because, in the development
projects success is more than achieving schedule and budget goals, it includes meeting stakeholder
expectation and benefit. Measuring these criteria of project success is more difficult and some can only
be evaluated years after project completion. So, for many organizations, these types of evaluations are
unachievable due to lack of funding.
A difference must be made between project success and project management success before assessing
success. Project success is defined as achieving effectiveness (project deliverables achieved its
objective and meet stakeholder satisfaction), while project management success is defined as achieving
efficiency (how the project manages its resource to achieve its goal). According to (Bilir, 2022), Over
90% of studies, including studies like chaos report and scientific publication, project success and
failure considered the triple constraints (iron triangle) base. according to this criterion to be successful,
project must be on time, within budget and in specification. In addition, according to (Wang et al.,
2022), project is successful if it its completion is within the constraints of time, cost, and performance.
In project management, all projects builds upon a foundation called critical success factor (CSF) which
is a criterion a project needs to satisfy. They used as the definition of project success defined as cost,
schedule, scope, quality, and satisfaction. As stated by (Scott, 2013) the main pointer of success of the
project is encompassed of on time finishing of work, finish the work under predicted budget, and most
significantly meet the exact desire of customers. They are considered highly relevant and frequently
used in practice for assessing project success.
As (Shamim, 2022) defined the success factors of a project, there are three factors that determine the
success of a project: Quality, costs and time, also called the iron triangle. Since they can be easily
measured statistically, they are specific standards for measuring project success. This means Project
has to be completed within the predefined time schedule and budget, respectively measured by quality,
delivery time and costs. If one or more of these criteria are not met, project success is expected to be
lower (Willumsen et al., 2019).
These three project constraints were defined as follow by (Shamim, 2022; Iriarte et al., 2020):-
Quality: Projects are formed to meet some predefined technical specification. Thus, measuring
success consider determining to what extent the project fulfills the predefined specification.
Time: Projects are obliged to a time outline amid which they are to be completed. No projects
are planning to proceed until the end of time. Hence, one of the fundamental necessities that
12
control project management and determine its success is whether it is completed on the pre-
planned schedule or not.
Cost: Projects are obliged to a restricted budget; no company has boundless assets to spend on
projects. Projects moreover compete for assets between each other. In arrange to utilize
resources effectively projects must follow to confirmed budget. Hence, the second requirement
that control project management and determine its success is whether it is completed within pre-
planned budget or not.
The West Guji Zone, characterized by rapid development and infrastructural expansion, presents
distinct challenges such as resource constraints, logistical issues, and regulatory hurdles. However,
there is a scarcity of research examining how these specific challenges impact the implementation and
success of project monitoring practices. Understanding these localized issues is crucial for developing
tailored strategies that can enhance project success in such regions.
Previous research often lacks a detailed evaluation of the specific tools and techniques used in project
monitoring within the construction sector. There is a need for studies that analyze the practical
application and effectiveness of various monitoring tools, such as progress tracking, reporting, change
control, and documentation. By focusing on the West Guji Zone Construction Office, this study can fill
the gap by providing insights into which monitoring practices are most effective in the regional context
and identifying areas where improvements are needed. This targeted research will not only contribute
to the academic field but also offer practical recommendations for enhancing project monitoring and
success in similar settings.
13
2.6. Conceptual Framework of the Study
The conceptual framework for the study illustrates the relationship between key project monitoring
practices and project success. This study identifies four independent variables: project progress
tracking, project progress reporting, project change control, and project documentation, each with
specific definitions, components, and hypotheses regarding their impact on project success. Project
progress tracking involves systematic recording and analysis against planned milestones, enhancing
success through timely corrective actions. Project progress reporting ensures stakeholder awareness and
informed decision-making via detailed reports and performance dashboards. Project change control
manages changes in scope, schedule, and budget to mitigate risks like scope creep and budget overruns.
Project documentation systematically records project information and lessons learned, facilitating
knowledge transfer and future planning. The dependent variable, project success, is defined by
achieving objectives within time, cost, and quality constraints, measured through metrics like
completion time, cost variance, and stakeholder satisfaction. Figure 2.1 reveals the conceptual
framework of this study, which correlate effective monitoring practices lead to successful project
outcomes by ensuring early issue detection, transparency, controlled changes, and comprehensive
documentation, specifically within the West Guji Zone Construction Office, offering insights to
improve project management practices.
Variable
Independent Independent
Project Success
Dependent
14
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Introduction
This chapter outlines the research methodology employed to investigate the study, detailing the
strategies, procedures, and techniques used to identify, select, handle, and analyze information on the
topic of interest. Specifically, this section addresses the following key questions: what approach is used
to conduct the study, where the study is conducted (design), who constitutes the target population,
which sampling technique is employed, how data is collected or generated, and how data is analyzed.
Answering these questions enables the reader to critically evaluate the study's overall validity and
reliability.
The use of mixed methods in this study allows for a comprehensive exploration of project monitoring
practices (Kothari, 2004). Quantitative designs will be utilized to quantify aspects of project success
and monitor process efficiency, while qualitative methods provide deeper insights into the subjective
aspects of project monitoring practices in software development projects. This integrated approach will
aims to describe the current state of project monitoring in a nuanced manner, capturing both numerical
data and qualitative observations. By employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches, this
study will seeks to provide a holistic understanding of project monitoring practices and their impact on
project success within the context of software development projects.
15
3.3. Research Design
A research design is a systematic approach that researchers use to conduct scientific studies. To ensure
reliable and accurate findings, the research design must align with the chosen type of research
methodology. Generally, research can be categorized into three main types of designs. According to
Shiu (2009) and Saunders (2003), these are exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory. Exploratory
research design is employed to investigate a topic or issue in order to gain a better understanding of it.
Descriptive research, on the other hand, provides a detailed portrayal of specific aspects of a situation,
social context, or relationship. Its primary objective is to outline the characteristics of a population or
phenomenon. Explanatory research extends beyond exploratory and descriptive phases to uncover the
reasons behind observed phenomena, aiming to identify causes and factors (Kothari, 2004).
In this study, the researcher aims to examine the current project monitoring practices within the agency
and their impact on project success. Therefore, the study employs a combination of descriptive and
explanatory research designs. The descriptive aspect focuses on detailing the existing practices of
project monitoring, providing a comprehensive overview of how projects are currently monitored
within the agency. Meanwhile, the explanatory component seeks to delve deeper into understanding
why certain monitoring practices contribute to or hinder project success. By utilizing both descriptive
and explanatory research designs, this study aims to provide a thorough analysis of project monitoring
processes and their implications for project outcomes within the specified context.
Focusing on the staff of the West Guji Construction Office allows the research to delve into the
intricacies of project monitoring within the specific socio-economic and infrastructural landscape of the
West Guji Zone. By examining their experiences and perspectives, the study will aims to gain a
comprehensive understanding of how project monitoring practices influence project outcomes in
regional construction settings. Insights gathered from this targeted investigation will inform broader
16
conclusions and recommendations applicable not only to the West Guji Zone but also to similar
regional construction offices across Ethiopia, enhancing project management practices and outcomes in
the sector.
17
3.6. Types and Source of Data
The proposed study will employ a dual approach by utilizing both primary and secondary data sources.
Secondary data will play a crucial role in establishing a comprehensive background in the field of
project monitoring practices. Through a review of academic literature and industry reports, researchers
will contextualize their study within existing knowledge, identifying gaps and areas necessitating
further investigation. This secondary data will provide a broad understanding of historical
developments and current practices in project monitoring.
Concurrently, primary data collection from employees at the West Guji Construction Office will be
central to achieving the study's specific objectives. This firsthand data will offer detailed insights into
the implementation of project monitoring practices within the regional context. Integrating secondary
and primary data through a mixed-methods approach will enhance the study's validity and applicability.
It will enable researchers to develop nuanced insights into project monitoring within the West Guji
Construction Office, thereby facilitating meaningful recommendations for improving project outcomes
in similar regional settings.
18
trends and patterns in project monitoring and success over time within the West Guji Construction
Office.
To explore the relationship between project monitoring practices and project success more deeply,
correlation coefficients will be calculated. Additionally, multiple regression analysis will be employed
to model how various aspects of project monitoring influence overall project success, identifying the
relative importance of each monitoring practice in explaining variations in project outcomes.
Ultimately, by integrating descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis, this study aims to
provide practical insights and recommendations for enhancing project management practices within the
West Guji Construction Office and similar regional settings.
19
3.10. Consideration of Ethics
As noted by Kimmel (1998), researchers bear the responsibility of upholding ethical standards
throughout their studies. To ensure the protection of participants' rights and welfare in this study,
several measures will be implemented during both its preparation and execution. The researcher will
maintain transparency and honesty with all respondents, ensuring no deception occurs.
20
CHAPTER FOUR
WORK PLAN AND BUDGET BREAKDOWN
4.1. Work Plan of the Study
Table 4.1: Work plan of the study
Time Distribution in month of 2024 year
No Details/Task Components
Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov
1. Reviewing the related literature
2. Clarifying title and problem of the
study
3. Preparing the research proposal
4. Data collection and Analysis
5. Discussions and summarizing the
findings
6. Final paper submission and
defense
21
REFERENCE
Alwaly, K. A., & Alawi, N. A. (2020). Factors affecting the application of project management
knowledge guide (PMBOK® GUIDE) in construction projects in Yemen. International Journal
of Construction Engineering and Management, 9(3), 81-91
Armenia, S., Dangelico, R. M., Nonino, F., & Pompei, A. (2019). Sustainable project management: A
conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future
studies. Sustainability, 11(9), 2664
Beyer, E., Elsner, L. A., & Hagemann, A. (2021). Infrastructures for Global Production in Ethiopia and
Argentina: Commodity chains and urban spatial transformation. In Spatial Transformations (pp.
120-135). Routledge.
Bilir, C. (2022). Project success criteria, critical success factors (CSF), and agile
projects. Contemporary challenges for Agile project management, 52-72.)
Budeli, L. (2020). Improving project monitoring and control performance using Blockchain
technology. PM World Journal, IX.
Castañé, G., Dolgui, A., Kousi, N., Meyers, B., Thevenin, S., Vyhmeister, E., & Östberg, P. O. (2022).
The ASSISTANT project: AI for high level decisions in manufacturing. International Journal
of Production Research, 1-19.).
Gizaw, S. (2022). Assessment Of Project Management Practices And Challenges: Evidence From
Selected Projects At The Ministry Of Agriculture (Doctoral Dissertation, St. Mary’s University).
Iriarte, C., & Bayona, S. (2020). IT projects success factors: a literature review. International Journal
of Information Systems and Project Management, 8(2), 49-78.).
Irfan, M., Hassan, M., & Hassan, N. (2019). The effect of project management capabilities on project
success in Pakistan: An empirical investigation. IEEE Access, 7, 39417-39431.
Irfan, M., Khan, S. Z., Hassan, N., Hassan, M., Habib, M., Khan, S., & Khan, H. H. (2021). Role of
project planning and project manager competencies on public sector project
success. Sustainability, 13(3), 1421
Josiah, C. (2019). Factors Affecting Triple Constraints in Project Management Success: A Case of Unit
Trust of Tanzania Projects and Infrastructure Development
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.
John Wiley & Sons
22
Mashele, L. M. (2019). The Mega-Project Paradox: Is the “New-Build Programme” the last mega-
project South Africa will see this century?. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).).
Menhas, R., Mahmood, S., Tanchangya, P., Safdar, M. N., & Hussain, S. (2019). Sustainable
development under belt and road initiative: A case study of China-Pakistan economic corridor’s
socio-economic impact on Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(21), 6143.
Ngala, G. K. (2019). Effect Of Scope Changes On Project Completion Among Road Construction
Projects In Nairobi County: A Case Of Lang'ata Sub County (Doctoral Dissertation, Africa
Nazarene University).
Okereke, C., Coke, A., Geebreyesus, M., Ginbo, T., Wakeford, J. J., & Mulugetta, Y. (2019).
Governing green industrialisation in Africa: Assessing key parameters for a sustainable socio-
technical transition in the context of Ethiopia. World Development, 115, 279-290
Pellerin, R., & Perrier, N. (2019). A review of methods, techniques and tools for project planning and
control. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2160-2178
Rashed, M. S., & Alnassar, W. I. (2021). Evaluating the performance of project management using
network diagrams methods: A case study in the Ramadi Municipality. Review of International
Geographical Education Online, 11(5).
Taghipour, M., Shabrang, M., Habibi, M. H., & Shamami, N. (2020). Assessment and Analysis of Risk
Associated with the Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Project Using
FMEA Technique (Including Case-Study). Management, 3(1), 29-46.)
Tereso, A., Ribeiro, P., Fernandes, G., Loureiro, I., & Ferreira, M. (2019). Project management
practices in private organizations. Project Management Journal, 50(1), 6-22)
Trzeciak, M., & Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2021). Monitoring and control in program management as
effectiveness drivers in polish energy sector. Diagnosis and directions of
improvement. Energies, 14(15), 4661.
Shamim, M. M. I. (2022). The Effects of COVID-19 on Project Management Processes and
Practices. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 3(7), 221-227.).
Soboleva, E. V., & Karavaev, N. L. (2020). Characteristics of the Project-Based Teamwork in the Case
of Developing a Smart Application in a Digital Educational Environment. European Journal of
Contemporary Education, 9(2), 417-433
23
Wang, T., Xu, J., He, Q., Chan, A. P., & Owusu, E. K. (2022). Studies on the success criteria and
critical success factors for mega infrastructure construction projects: A literature
review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.)
Williams, T. M. Project success. In The Front-end of Large Public Projects (pp. 10-42). Routledge.).
Willumsen, P., Oehmen, J., Stingl, V., & Geraldi, J. (2019). Value creation through project risk
management. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 731-749.)
Wu, G., Hu, Z., & Zheng, J. (2019). Role stress, job burnout, and job performance in construction
project managers: the moderating role of career calling. International journal of environmental
research and public health, 16(13), 2394
Wysocki, Robert K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, and Extreme. 7th
edition. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Young, R., Chen, W., Quazi, A., Parry, W., Wong, A., & Poon, S. K. (2020). The relationship between
project governance mechanisms and project success: An international data set. International
Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), 1496-1521.).
Yu and Kwon. (2011). Project managers‟ and change manager's‟ contribution to success.
Zakrzewska, M., Piwowar‐Sulej, K., Jarosz, S., Sagan, A., & Sołtysik, M. (2022). The linkage between
Agile project management and sustainable development: A theoretical and empirical
view. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 855-869.
Zid, C., Kasim, N., & Soomro, A. R. (2020). Effective project management approach to attain project
success, based on cost-time-quality. International Journal of Project Organisation and
Management, 12(2), 149-163
24