Buddhism and The Transformation To Sustainable Economies
Buddhism and The Transformation To Sustainable Economies
Buddhism and The Transformation To Sustainable Economies
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41472079?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Akadémiai Kiadó is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Society
and Economy
PETER DANIELS
A major premise of this paper is that Buddhism provides a logic and means to help resolve this t
sion between in-grained economic system imperatives and the changes actually required for ach
ing environmental sustainability. In this simple depiction, we examine the logic inherent wi
Buddhism's Four Noble Truths, and the means proffered in the Eightfold Path, and extend u
these basic ideas with knowledge and experience available from 21st century environmental scien
economics and technology fields. The ultimate goal is to illustrate how this ancient wisdom can h
inform and facilitate the successful transformation to sustainable human economies.
1. INTRODUCTION
After decades of convenient denial, it is now difficult to reject that the bioph
scale of human activities is having substantial impacts upon conditions f
within the ecosphere. A partial list of evidence includes the human-indu
of fisheries, forests and wetlands, the unprecedented rate of species ex
(since Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras), extensive land degradation through d
fication, soil erosion and salinisation, water quality and availability probl
the ever-growing support for the imminent and severe potential of global war
and peak oil (Rees - Wackernagel 1996). These impacts all stem from the
cance of the material or energy scale of human intervention in natural cy
processes such as carbon, water, nitrogen, and phosphorous cycles and ne
synthesis (Ayres 1993; Bartelmus - Seifert 2003; Millennium Ecosystem
ment Board 2005; Wackernagel et al. 2006).
1 588-97 26/$20.00 ^ 2007 Akadév liai Kiadó, Budapest
In this section, some of the basic metaphysics and logical premises of Budd
are examined in order to help identify the primary sources of human pre
upon the natural environment. In turn, this helps identify the adaptive resp
that may reduce this impact to sustainable levels. The First and Second No
Truths of Buddhism provide the basis for understanding the "drivers" or ess
causes that have shot humans into a trajectory that is not just unsustainable,
proving ineffective in improving welfare beyond basic material requisites.
Third and Fourth Noble Truths (especially the Eight-fold path embodied in
latter) establish the "response" in the form of individual psychological, be
ioural and institutional changes that could direct personal and socioecon
change towards sustainability.
In general, sustainability is about ensuring the conditions for "acceptable"
fare levels of all people extended across spatial (intra-generational) and tem
(inter-generational) dimensions. These conditions require maintenance (som
Consumption
Production
Buddhist wisdom also has much to offer for private and public sector "business"
or livelihood activity and decisions from individual and small business, to corpo-
rate and government levels.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The aim of the paper has been to illustrate how Buddhism can help in
provide a logical and ethical basis for the substantive changes required f
ing sustainable economies. This contribution can be identified in produc
sumption and lifestyle, and many supporting aspects of the socioecon
tem. Regarding demand-side aspects of the economy, the two main
stones provided by Buddhism include:
The first condition asks for very substantive societal efforts towards
ing for social and natural externalities of human choices. The second tas
intensive effort towards the systematic study of the nature of "happin
how it is affected by the externalities associated with forms of intent and a
Global society must move away from a model that is not only having
and unsustainable negative externality and resource impacts upon natur
also generally failed to deliver perceptible gains in life satisfaction. W
dhism's universal interdependence context and karmic law depiction of
and action, the changes required are simply a matter of getting our pr
right; so that we demand and pursue activities and goals to a level and f
genuinely yield life satisfaction. Choices that reflect non-violence, mod
demands, minimum intervention and disruption with regard to natural
quintessential features of the BISE (Payutto 1994). Appropriate producti
ity flows from such changes in consumption patterns but also requires
of interconnection" to guide motives and decisions of people in their
roles as the managers and workers in productive enterprise.
For a BISE, collective societal strategic action can help reshape asp
lifestyle choices and habits, and modify the social context and physical
human settlements, to align outcomes with true long-term welfare and
mental sustainability. In practice, these efforts are all interrelated and i
Such hopes are not Utopian. There is already a panoply of nascent pro-sustain-
ability developments in higher-income nations covering diet and food production;
consumption behaviours (with downshifting, voluntary simplicity and LOHAS -
Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability); meditation, yoga and other activities ori-
ented towards nonmaterial-based satisfaction; and ethical investment. Such trends
have a strong intellectual foundation in the arena of scientific knowledge (with
consistent developments across philosophy, sociology, economics to ecology and
physics). The emergent social and intellectual developments share much in com-
mon with the Buddhist view of the nature of reality and path to well-being, and
they sit very comfortably together in their adherence to the necessary conjugation
between (1) reducing society's metabolism (and hence nature intervention levels)
and (2) the intrinsic interconnectedness of human existence and interaction with
the broader social and natural worlds. Arguably, this is the only adaptive response
to the world's, now very clear, future environmental and social challenges. It
would be surprising if the existing interplay between Buddhism and related
ethical bases, and sustainable behaviour and social systems, does not continue to
flourish into the future.
REFERENCES
Dixon, F. (2004): Improving Unsustainable Western Economic Systems. In: Ura, К. - Galay, К.
(eds): Gross National Happiness and Development. Proceedings of the First International Semi-
nar on Operationalization of Gross National Happiness. Thimphu: The Centre for Bhutan Stud-
ies, 105-120.
Ehrlich, P. - Holdren, J. ( 1 972): Impact of population growth. In: Riker, R. G. (ed.): Population, Re-
sources, and the Environment. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 365-377.
Ekins, P. - Simon, S. - Deutsch, L. - Folke, C. - de Groot, R. (2003): A framework for the practical
application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Eco-
nomics, 44: 165-185.
Elkington, J. (1994): Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sus-
tainable development. California Management Review, 36(2): 90-100.
Epstein, M. (2005): Open to Desire: The Truth about What the Buddha Taught. New York: Gotham
Books.
Nanamoli, B. (1995): The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Majjhima
Nikaya (Teachings of the Buddha). Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Nelson, D. (2004): Why is Buddhism the fastest growing religion in Australia? Buddhanet Maga-
zine, http://www.buddhanet.net/whybudoz.htm/.
North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Payutto, V. P. A. (1994): Buddhist economics: A middle way for the market place. Translated by
Dhammavijaya and Bruce Evans. Internet article. http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acad-
emy/9280/econ.htm/. Viewed 20 July 2007.
Pearce, D. - Markandya, A. - Barbier, E. (1989): Blueprint for a Green Economy. London:
Earthscan.