1

An Analytical Study of Organized Crimes in the State

of Rajasthan: Emerging Issues, Challenges, and
Solutions

Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1 Introduction:

Organized crime poses a significant challenge to the socio-economic fabric and the
rule of law in India. Over the years, the landscape of organized crime in the
country has evolved, presenting new complexities and threats that demand a
comprehensive understanding and strategic response. This analytical study aims to
delve into the various dimensions of organized crime in India, highlighting
emerging issues, identifying challenges, and proposing viable solutions.

The term "organized crime" encompasses a wide array of illicit activities

orchestrated by structured groups with a clear hierarchy and division of labor.
These groups engage in activities such as drug trafficking, human trafficking,
extortion, arms smuggling, cybercrime, and money laundering, among others.
Their operations are often clandestine, sophisticated, and transnational in nature,
posing a grave threat to national security and public safety.

One of the emerging issues in the realm of organized crime in India is the nexus
between criminal syndicates and elements within the political and bureaucratic
establishment. This symbiotic relationship not only enables criminal enterprises to
 2

thrive with impunity but also undermines the integrity of democratic institutions
and erodes public trust in governance. Furthermore, the advent of technology has
facilitated the expansion of cybercrime networks, presenting new challenges in
combating digital threats and ensuring cybersecurity.

Moreover, the geographical diversity and socio-economic disparities in India

contribute to the proliferation of organized crime, with different regions grappling
with distinct challenges. For instance, states with porous borders are particularly
vulnerable to cross-border smuggling of contraband goods and trafficking of
humans and narcotics. Additionally, urban centers serve as hubs for various
criminal activities, fueled by factors such as rapid urbanization, unemployment,
and income inequality.

Addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by organized crime requires a

holistic approach that integrates law enforcement efforts, legislative reforms,
international cooperation, and community engagement. Strengthening the legal
framework to enhance the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of organized
crime cases is imperative. This entails enacting stringent laws, empowering law
enforcement agencies with adequate resources and technology, and establishing
specialized courts for expeditious trials.

Furthermore, disrupting the financial infrastructure of criminal syndicates through

effective anti-money laundering measures and asset forfeiture laws is essential to
undermine their economic viability. International cooperation and information-
sharing mechanisms play a crucial role in combating transnational organized
crime, necessitating collaborative efforts with foreign counterparts and
international organizations.

* Hemant More, March, Organized crime in India, 2020.

 3

At the grassroots level, community participation and awareness campaigns are

instrumental in preventing youth radicalization, countering extremist ideologies,
and fostering resilience against organized crime. Educational initiatives aimed at
promoting ethical values, critical thinking, and digital literacy can empower
individuals to resist the allure of illicit activities and become active agents of
positive change in their communities.

In conclusion, the study of organized crime in India demands a nuanced

understanding of its evolving dynamics, rooted in socio-economic, political, and
technological factors. By identifying emerging issues, acknowledging challenges,
and advocating for comprehensive solutions, stakeholders can collectively work
towards mitigating the threats posed by organized crime and safeguarding the
integrity of society and the rule of law.

In subsequent sections, this study will delve deeper into the specific manifestations
of organized crime in India, analyze its impact on various sectors, and propose
targeted interventions to address these challenges effectively.

1.2 Objective Of Study

The primary objective of this study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of

organized crime in India, with a focus on understanding its various dimensions,
identifying emerging issues, delineating challenges, and proposing effective
solutions. Specifically, the study aims to achieve the following objectives:

* Madan Lal Sharma. Organized crime in India: Problems and Perspectives, 108 th International seminar visiting
expert’s papers.

** Klaus Von Lampe. Organized crime research in perspective

 4

1. Identify Emerging Trends: To examine the evolving nature of organized crime

in India and identify emerging trends and patterns, including changes in modus
operandi, new criminal enterprises, and emerging hotspots.
2. Assess Socio-Economic Impact: To assess the socio-economic impact of
organized crime on individuals, communities, businesses, and the overall economy
of India, including its implications for public safety, public health, and national
security.
3. Analyze Legal and Institutional Framework: To analyze the existing legal
and institutional framework for combating organized crime in India, including
relevant laws, law enforcement agencies, judicial mechanisms, and international
conventions.
4. Examine Challenges and Vulnerabilities: To examine the challenges and
vulnerabilities inherent in the fight against organized crime in India, including
issues related to governance, corruption, resource constraints, and the nexus
between criminals and state actors.
5. Propose Policy Recommendations: To propose policy recommendations and
strategic interventions aimed at addressing the identified challenges, strengthening
the capacity of law enforcement agencies, enhancing legal frameworks, promoting
international cooperation, and empowering communities to prevent and combat
organized crime effectively.
6. Promote Awareness and Advocacy: To raise awareness about the threat posed
by organized crime in India among policymakers, law enforcement officials, civil
society organizations, and the general public, and to advocate for concerted action
and collaboration at the national and international levels.
* JS Albanese, The Prediction and Control of Organized crimes-New OJP resources.
** P Hauck Organized crime and gang violence in national and international law.
 5

By achieving these objectives, this study seeks to contribute to the body of

knowledge on organized crime in India, inform evidence-based policy-making, and
facilitate multi-stakeholder efforts to combat this pervasive threat to society and
the rule of law.

1.3 Importance Of Study

The study of organized crime in India holds significant importance due to its wide-
ranging implications for society, governance, and national security. Several key
aspects highlight the importance of this study:
1. National Security Concerns: Organized crime poses a serious threat to
national security by fueling violence, undermining law and order, and eroding the
sovereignty of the state. Understanding the dynamics of organized crime is crucial
for safeguarding the integrity of the nation and protecting its citizens from internal
and external threats.
2. Socio-Economic Impact: Organized crime exerts a detrimental impact on the
socio-economic fabric of society, hindering economic development, distorting
markets, and perpetuating inequality. By assessing the socio-economic
ramifications of organized crime, policymakers can devise targeted interventions to
mitigate its adverse effects on individuals, communities, and businesses.
3. Rule of Law and Governance: The proliferation of organized crime
undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in governance institutions.
Examining the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies and the judiciary in
combating organized crime is essential for strengthening institutional capacity,
enhancing accountability, and restoring public confidence in the criminal justice
system.
 6

4. Transnational Dimensions: Organized crime networks operate across national

borders, exploiting differences in legal systems, regulatory regimes, and law
enforcement capacities. Understanding the transnational dimensions of organized
crime is imperative for fostering international cooperation, sharing intelligence,
and coordinating efforts to disrupt criminal networks at the global level.
5. Human Rights and Public Safety: Organized crime perpetrates heinous crimes
such as human trafficking, drug trafficking, and extortion, violating fundamental
human rights and jeopardizing public safety. By shedding light on these human
rights abuses and advocating for the protection of vulnerable populations, this
study can contribute to efforts to combat human trafficking, protect victims, and
promote justice and accountability.
6. Policy Formulation and Advocacy: Evidence-based research on organized
crime in India can inform policy formulation and advocacy efforts aimed at
strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing law enforcement capabilities, and
fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration. By providing policymakers with
actionable recommendations, this study can facilitate the development of effective
strategies to prevent and combat organized crime.
In summary, the study of organized crime in India is essential for addressing the
multifaceted challenges posed by criminal syndicates, safeguarding national
security, promoting socio-economic development, upholding the rule of law,
protecting human rights, and fostering international cooperation. By illuminating
the complexities of organized crime and proposing viable solutions, this study can
contribute to building resilient and secure societies grounded in the principles of
justice, democracy, and human dignity.
 7

1.4 Literature Review

The literature on organized crime in India provides valuable insights into the
various dimensions, dynamics, and challenges associated with this pervasive
phenomenon. Drawing upon a diverse array of scholarly research, empirical
studies, government reports, and journalistic accounts, the literature review
highlights key findings and contributions in the field of organized crime studies in
India.
Historical Context: Many studies contextualize the emergence and evolution of
organized crime in India within historical, socio-economic, and political
frameworks. They trace the roots of organized crime to colonial legacies, post-
independence socio-economic transformations, and the nexus between criminal
elements and political elites.
Types of Organized Crime: The literature documents the diverse manifestations
of organized crime in India, including drug trafficking, human trafficking, arms
smuggling, extortion, money laundering, cybercrime, and illicit wildlife trade. It
analyzes the modus operandi, structures, and networks of criminal syndicates
operating in different regions and sectors.
Regional Variances: Several studies highlight the regional variances in organized
crime dynamics, reflecting variations in geography, demographics, and socio-
economic conditions. They examine the unique challenges posed by organized
crime in states with porous borders, coastal regions, urban centers, and conflict-
affected areas.
* Nafiu Ahmed. Transitional organized crime in India: A new Framework of Analysis, European Journal of Social
Sciences 2(5):33-49.
** Sumita Sarkar, Arvind Tiwari, Combating Organized crimes, A case study of Mumbai City, Institute for conflict
Management, South Asia Terrorism Portal
 8

Political-Criminal Nexus: A significant focus of the literature is on the symbiotic

relationship between criminal syndicates and elements within the political and
bureaucratic establishment. These studies investigate the mechanisms of collusion,
corruption, and patronage that enable organized crime to infiltrate and influence
governance structures.
Law Enforcement Challenges: Scholars explore the challenges faced by law
enforcement agencies in investigating, prosecuting, and dismantling organized
crime networks. They examine issues such as resource constraints, institutional
weaknesses, politicization of law enforcement, and lack of coordination between
state and central agencies.
Legal Framework and Policy Responses: The literature evaluates the adequacy
of existing legal frameworks and policy responses in addressing organized crime in
India. It assesses the effectiveness of legislation such as the Prevention of Money
Laundering Act (PMLA), the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act
(NDPS Act), and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in combating
organized crime.
Community Perspectives and Resilience: Some studies adopt a community-
centric approach to understanding and addressing organized crime, emphasizing
the role of communities in preventing crime, promoting social cohesion, and
building resilience against criminal influences.
International Dimensions: Given the transnational nature of organized crime, the
literature explores the international dimensions of criminal networks operating in
India, including their links to global drug cartels, terrorist organizations, and illicit
financial flows.
*Adamoli Sabrina, Andra D.N (1998). Organised Crime Around the World. Helsinki: Willowtree Press
Overall, the literature on organized crime in India provides a rich tapestry of
knowledge and insights, offering a holistic understanding of this complex and
 9

multifaceted phenomenon. By synthesizing and building upon existing scholarship,

this study aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on organized crime and
inform evidence-based policy-making and interventions aimed at combating this
pervasive threat to society and the rule of law.

1.5 Research Questions

Based on the objectives and the existing literature, here are some research
questions that could guide the study on organized crime in India:
Q.1. What are the emerging trends and patterns of organized crime in India, and
how have they evolved over time?
Q.2. How does organized crime impact the socio-economic fabric of Indian
society, including its implications for public safety, public health, and national
security?
Q.3. What are the key challenges faced by law enforcement agencies and the
judiciary in combating organized crime in India, and how do these challenges vary
across regions and sectors?
Q.4. What is the nature and extent of the nexus between criminal syndicates and
elements within the political and bureaucratic establishment in India, and what are
the implications for governance and the rule of law?
Q.5. How effective are the existing legal frameworks and policy responses in
addressing organized crime in India, and what are the gaps and limitations in their
implementation?
Q.6. What are the socio-economic and political factors that contribute to the
proliferation of organized crime in different regions of India, and how do these
factors intersect with issues such as poverty, unemployment, and social inequality?
 10

Q.7. How can community participation and grassroots initiatives are leveraged to
prevent and combat organized crime in India, and what role do civil society
organizations and local institutions play in this regard?
Q.8. What opportunities exist for enhancing international cooperation and
collaboration in combating transnational organized crime networks operating in
India, and what are the challenges and barriers to such cooperation?
Q.9. How can innovative technologies and data analytics be utilized to strengthen
law enforcement efforts and disrupt the operations of organized crime networks in
India?
Q.10. What policy recommendations can be proposed to address the identified
challenges, strengthen institutional capacity, and foster multi-stakeholder
collaboration in the fight against organized crime in India?

By addressing these research questions, the study aims to deepen our

understanding of organized crime in India, identify effective strategies for
prevention and intervention, and contribute to the development of evidence-based
policies and initiatives aimed at combating this pervasive threat to society.

1.6 Hypothesis
Formulating hypotheses can help guide the research direction and provide a
framework for testing and analyzing data. Here are some hypothetical statements
based on the research questions and the context of organized crime in India:
Increased socio-economic disparities and inadequate governance structures
contribute to the proliferation of organized crime in India, particularly in regions
with high poverty rates and weak law enforcement.
*Abadinsky Howard (2003). Organized Crime. Belmont ,California: Wordsworth Publishing Company.
**Albert K. Cohen, A. L. (1956). The Sutherland Papers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

*
Monika Sharma. August, Organized Crimes: An overview, Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior, 2019, 5(5).
** Nichos Farrelly. December, Organized Crimes Control in Aisa Experiences from India, China and the Golden
Triangle, SSRN, 2014.
 11

This hypotheses serve as starting points for empirical research and data analysis,
guiding the investigation into the complexities of organized crime in India and
informing evidence-based policy-making and interventions.

1.7 Research Methodology

Doctrinal Research Methodology has been adopted by the researcher.

Here is a proposed research methodology.

Literature Review: Begin by conducting a thorough review of existing literature

on organized crime in India, including scholarly articles, government reports,
policy documents, and journalistic investigations. This will provide a foundational
understanding of the subject and help identify gaps in knowledge and areas for
further inquiry.
Drawing Upon A Combination Of Doctoral Research Methodology: Conduct
qualitative research methods such as interviews, focus groups, and case studies to
gather insights from key stakeholders, including law enforcement officials,
policymakers, community leaders, and members of civil society organizations.
Qualitative research can provide rich, contextualized data on the dynamics,
challenges, and responses to organized crime in India.
Quantitative Analysis: Utilize quantitative methods to analyze data on crime
rates, arrest records, conviction rates, financial transactions, and other relevant
indicators. Statistical analysis can help identify trends, correlations, and patterns in
organized crime activities across different regions and over time.
Case Studies: Explore specific case studies of organized crime operations in India,
examining the modus operandi, organizational structures, and outcomes of law
enforcement interventions. Case studies can provide valuable insights into the
 12

strategies and tactics employed by criminal syndicates and the effectiveness of

countermeasures.
Comparative Analysis: Conduct comparative analysis with other countries or
regions facing similar challenges of organized crime to identify best practices,
lessons learned, and potential policy solutions. Comparing the Indian context with
international experiences can enrich understanding and inform evidence-based
interventions.
Data Visualization: Use data visualization techniques such as charts, graphs, and
maps to present research findings in a visually compelling and accessible manner.
Data visualization can help identify patterns, trends, and relationships that may not
be immediately apparent from raw data.
Ethical Considerations: Ensure that the research adheres to ethical principles and
guidelines, particularly when conducting interviews or collecting sensitive
information. Respect the confidentiality and privacy of research participants and
obtain informed consent where necessary.
Interdisciplinary Approach: Adopt an interdisciplinary approach that draws upon
insights from fields such as criminology, sociology, political science, economics,
and public policy. This holistic perspective can provide a comprehensive
understanding of the multifaceted nature of organized crime and its impact on
society.
Peer Review: Subject the research findings to peer review by experts in the field
to ensure rigor, accuracy, and validity. Peer review can help identify potential
biases, methodological limitations, and areas for improvement in the research
methodology and analysis.
Policy Recommendations: Translate research findings into actionable policy
recommendations aimed at addressing the identified challenges, strengthening
 13

institutional capacity, and fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration in the fight

against organized crime in India.
By employing a robust research methodology that integrates qualitative and
quantitative approaches, this study can contribute to advancing knowledge,
informing evidence-based policy-making, and enhancing efforts to combat
organized crime in India.

1.8 Chapter Plan

 Introduction
 Historical Background Of Organized Crime In India.
 Legal Instruments Or Laws Dealing With Organized Crime In The
State Of Rajasthan, India And At International Level.
 Organized Crime In The State Of Rajasthan.
 Challenges In Combating Organized Crime.
 Judicial Approach Toward Organized Crime.

1.9 Conclusion

In conclusion, the study of organized crime in India is essential for understanding

the complex dynamics, challenges, and implications of this pervasive phenomenon.
Through a comprehensive research methodology that encompasses literature
review, qualitative and quantitative research methods, case studies, comparative
analysis, and interdisciplinary insights, this study aims to shed light on the various
dimensions of organized crime and propose effective strategies for prevention and
intervention.
* M Vishwanath. October, A critical Study of legal control of organized crimes in India. Shodhganga, 2009.
 14

The literature review provided a foundation for the study by synthesizing existing
knowledge and identifying gaps in research. It highlighted the historical context,
regional variances, political-criminal nexus, law enforcement challenges, legal
frameworks, community perspectives, and international dimensions of organized
crime in India.
Building upon this knowledge, the research methodology outlined a multifaceted
approach to data collection, analysis, and interpretation. By combining qualitative
and quantitative methods, conducting case studies, and adopting an
interdisciplinary perspective, the study aims to generate robust findings that can
inform evidence-based policy-making and interventions.
The hypotheses formulated provide testable propositions for empirical research,
guiding the investigation into the root causes, mechanisms, and impacts of
organized crime in India. These hypotheses serve as guiding principles for data
analysis and interpretation, facilitating the development of nuanced insights and
policy recommendations.
Ultimately, the findings of this study have the potential to contribute to the
advancement of knowledge, the enhancement of institutional capacity, and the
promotion of multi-stakeholder collaboration in the fight against organized crime
in India. By addressing the identified challenges, proposing viable solutions, and
advocating for evidence-based policies, this study seeks to strengthen the resilience
of Indian society and safeguard the rule of law against the threats posed by
organized crime.
 15

Chapter 2 –Historical Background Of Organized Crime In India

2.1 Introduction

Organized crime in India has a rich and complex history, shaped by a confluence
of socio-economic, political, and cultural factors. This chapter delves into the
historical development and background of organized crime in India, exploring its
evolution, defining characteristics, and changing dynamics over time.

2.2 Concept of Organized Crime:

Organized crime refers to criminal activities that are carried out by structured
groups typically operating over an extended period. These groups, often referred to
as criminal syndicates or organized crime networks, have a hierarchical structure,
clear division of labor, and employ systematic methods to pursue illicit activities
for profit or power. The concept of organized crime encompasses a wide range of
illegal enterprises, including drug trafficking, human trafficking, extortion,
racketeering, money laundering, cybercrime, and more.

2.3. Key features of organized crime include:

1. Hierarchy and Structure: Organized crime groups operate under a hierarchical

structure, with leaders at the top overseeing various levels of subordinates. This
structure enables efficient coordination and division of tasks within the criminal
organization.
*Bhagat, S. K. (2009). Human Trafficking Biggest Social Crime. New Delhi: MD Publications Pvt Ltd.
 16

2. Division of Labor: Within organized crime groups, individuals have specialized

roles and responsibilities, such as leaders, enforcers, recruiters, and money
launderers. Each member contributes to the overall functioning of the criminal
enterprise.
3. Continuity and Permanence: Unlike spontaneous or ad-hoc criminal activities,
organized crime operates as a long-term enterprise, often spanning generations.
These criminal networks establish enduring relationships and infrastructures to
sustain their illicit operations over time.
4.Violence and Coercion: Organized crime groups often use violence,
intimidation, and coercion to maintain control over territories, protect their
interests, and silence potential informants or rivals. This includes threats against
individuals, businesses, and even law enforcement officials.
5. Profit Motive: While some organized crime activities may have ideological or
political motivations, the primary driving force behind most criminal enterprises is
financial gain. Organized crime groups engage in lucrative illegal activities to
amass wealth and power.
6. Transnational Operations: Many organized crime syndicates operate across
national borders, taking advantage of globalized networks for the trafficking of
drugs, humans, weapons, and other contraband. This transnational nature poses
challenges for law enforcement and requires international cooperation to combat
effectively.
7.Corruption and Complicity: Organized crime often thrives in environments
where corruption is prevalent. Criminal syndicates may infiltrate government
institutions, law enforcement agencies, and businesses through bribery, extortion,
and coercion, facilitating their illicit activities and evading justice.
*Crime in India. (2007) Delhi: National Crime Records Bureau, MHA. (2013) Delhi: National Crime
Records Bureau, MHA.
 17

8. Adaptability and Innovation: Organized crime groups demonstrate a

remarkable ability to adapt to changing circumstances and exploit new
opportunities. They constantly evolve their tactics, techniques, and technologies to
stay ahead of law enforcement efforts and overcome obstacles.
9. Global Networks: Organized crime operates within interconnected networks
that transcend geographical boundaries. These networks facilitate collaboration,
resource-sharing, and the expansion of criminal activities across multiple
jurisdictions. Globalization, advancements in communication technology, and ease
of travel have further facilitated the globalization of organized crime.
10. Complexity and Multifaceted Nature: Organized crime is not monolithic but
rather comprises diverse groups engaged in various criminal enterprises. Some
criminal syndicates focus on traditional activities like drug trafficking or extortion,
while others engage in sophisticated schemes such as cybercrime, intellectual
property theft, or illicit trade in counterfeit goods.
11. Impact on Society: The activities of organized crime have far-reaching
consequences for society, including undermining the rule of law, eroding public
trust in institutions, fostering corruption, exacerbating violence and insecurity,
distorting markets, and hindering economic development. Organized crime also
poses significant public health risks, particularly concerning drug trafficking and
human trafficking.
*Eight United Nations Congress on Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders (report no.
A/45/756). (1990, September 7). Retrieved from
http://www.unodc.org/documents/congress//Previous_Congresses/8th_Congre
ss_1990/028_ACONF.144.28.Rev.1_Report_Eighth_United_Nations_Congres
s_on_the_Prevention_of_Crime_and_the_Treatment_of_Offenders.pdf

**Deb. R. (1995). Principles of Criminology Criminal Law &Investigation . Calcutta: SC Sarkar & Sons Pvt.
Ltd.
 18

12. Role of Technology: The digital age has revolutionized the landscape of
organized crime, providing new avenues for illicit activities and increasing the
scale and sophistication of criminal operations. Organized crime groups leverage
technology for communication, encryption, money laundering, identity theft,
online fraud, and other cybercrimes, posing significant challenges for law
enforcement and cybersecurity efforts.
13. Interplay with Legal and Illegal Economies: Organized crime intersects with
both legal and illegal economies, influencing legitimate businesses, financial
institutions, and government agencies. Criminal organizations may infiltrate lawful
industries, engage in money laundering, or invest illicit proceeds in legitimate
enterprises to legitimize their wealth and conceal their criminal activities.
14. Social and Cultural Context: The prevalence and persistence of organized
crime are often intertwined with broader social, economic, and cultural factors
such as poverty, inequality, social marginalization, political instability, weak
governance, and historical legacies. Understanding these contextual factors is
crucial for developing effective strategies to address organized crime.
15. Ethical Dilemmas: Combatting organized crime raises complex ethical
dilemmas, particularly concerning law enforcement tactics, surveillance methods,
human rights, and privacy considerations. Balancing the imperative to uphold the
rule of law with respect for individual rights and liberties requires careful
deliberation and adherence to legal and ethical standards.
16. Cultural Dimensions: Cultural factors play a significant role in shaping the
dynamics of organized crime. In some contexts, organized crime may be deeply
entrenched in local cultures, norms, and traditions, influencing social perceptions,
behaviors, and attitudes towards criminal activities. Cultural factors can also affect
the recruitment, socialization, and loyalty within criminal networks.
 19

17. Gender Dynamics: Organized crime is not immune to gender dynamics, with
men traditionally occupying prominent roles in criminal hierarchies. However,
there is increasing recognition of the involvement of women in various aspects of
organized crime, including leadership positions, money laundering, and human
trafficking. Gender-based analysis is essential for understanding the distinct
experiences and vulnerabilities of men and women involved in organized crime.
18. The Role of Informal Economy: Organized crime often thrives within
informal economies characterized by a lack of regulation, oversight, and legal
protections. Informal economies provide fertile ground for illicit activities such as
smuggling, counterfeit goods trade, and unlicensed businesses. Organized crime
groups exploit these vulnerabilities to generate profits and expand their influence.
19. Psychological Factors: Psychological factors, such as greed, power-seeking
behavior, and thrill-seeking tendencies, can drive individuals to participate in
organized crime. The allure of quick wealth, status within criminal circles, and the
adrenaline rush of engaging in illicit activities can be powerful motivators for
individuals to join or collaborate with criminal networks.
20. Resilience and Adaptation: Despite law enforcement efforts to disrupt their
operations, organized crime groups often exhibit resilience and adaptability. They
may diversify their criminal activities, relocate operations to new areas, or
establish alliances with other criminal organizations to mitigate risks and maintain
profitability. Understanding the resilience mechanisms of organized crime is
crucial for developing effective counter-strategies.
21. Community Responses: Communities affected by organized crime often
develop their own responses to mitigate its impact, including neighborhood watch
programs, community policing initiatives, and grassroots advocacy efforts.
Empowering communities to resist criminal influence, foster social cohesion, and
 20

collaborate with law enforcement agencies is essential for building resilient

communities resilient to organized crime.
22. Legal and Regulatory Frameworks: Effective responses to organized crime
require robust legal and regulatory frameworks that provide law enforcement
agencies with the necessary tools and authorities to investigate, prosecute, and
disrupt criminal activities. Strengthening anti-money laundering laws, enhancing
asset forfeiture mechanisms, and implementing international legal instruments are
essential components of a comprehensive legal framework.
23. Prevention and Intervention: In addition to enforcement measures,
prevention and intervention strategies are critical for addressing the root causes of
organized crime and reducing its prevalence. Investing in education, economic
opportunities, social services, and community development can address underlying
factors such as poverty, unemployment, and social exclusion that contribute to the
vulnerability of individuals to involvement in organized crime.
24. Research and Knowledge Sharing: Continued research, data collection, and
knowledge sharing are essential for understanding the evolving nature of organized
crime and developing evidence-based interventions. Collaboration between
academia, government agencies, law enforcement, and civil society organizations
can facilitate the exchange of information, best practices, and lessons learned in the
fight against organized crime.
In conclusion, organized crime is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that
requires a comprehensive, multi-dimensional approach for effective prevention and
control. By addressing the socio-economic, cultural, legal, and psychological
dimensions of organized crime, societies can better understand and respond to this
persistent challenge.
*Mafia after the unification of Italy. (2008, 12 12). Retrieved from Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sicily
 21

2.4. Historical Development of Organized Crimes:

The historical roots of organized crime in India can be traced back to ancient times,
with references to organized criminal activities found in ancient texts and
scriptures. However, the modern manifestation of organized crime in India can be
attributed to various historical developments, including colonial rule, post-
independence socio-economic transformations, and globalization.

During colonial rule, the British East India Company and subsequent British
administrations facilitated various forms of criminal enterprises, including the
opium trade, smuggling, and organized crime syndicates such as the Thuggee cult.
The colonial legacy left deep scars on Indian society, paving the way for the
emergence of organized crime networks in the post-independence era.

The partition of India in 1947 further fueled organized crime, as displaced

populations, porous borders, and political instability created fertile ground for
criminal activities such as smuggling, human trafficking, and communal violence.
The subsequent decades witnessed the rise of powerful criminal syndicates, often
with political patronage, operating across different regions of India.

2.5. Definition and Types of Organized Crime:

Organized crime in India encompasses a wide array of illicit activities, each with
its own modus operandi, actors, and consequences. Some of the most prevalent
types of organized crime in India include:
Organized crime refers to criminal activities that are carried out by structured
groups or syndicates with the primary goal of generating profit or power through
 22

illegal means. These criminal organizations operate with a hierarchical structure,

division of labor, and often employ systematic methods to pursue their illicit
activities. The term "organized crime" encompasses a wide range of illegal
enterprises, and its definition may vary depending on legal and cultural contexts.

Types of organized crime include:

1. Drug Trafficking: Organized crime groups engage in the production,

transportation, distribution, and sale of illicit drugs such as cocaine, heroin,
methamphetamine, and synthetic opioids. Drug trafficking networks often span
multiple countries and regions, exploiting porous borders and trafficking routes to
smuggle drugs into lucrative markets.

2. Human Trafficking: Human trafficking involves the recruitment,

transportation, harboring, or exploitation of individuals through force, fraud, or
coercion for purposes such as forced labor, sexual exploitation, or organ
trafficking. Organized crime groups profit from the trafficking of vulnerable
individuals, often across national borders, and subject them to exploitation and
abuse.
3. Arms Trafficking: Organized crime syndicates facilitate the illegal trade in
firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other weapons. Arms trafficking networks
supply weapons to criminal organizations, terrorist groups, and conflict zones,
exacerbating violence, instability, and armed conflicts.
*Masahiro, T. (1998). Current Situation of organised crime .In report of India UNAFEI Joint Seminar on
organised crime Prevention and Control Strategies (p. 51). Delhi: NICFS (MHA) Government of India.

**.McCaffrey, L. J. (1976). The Irish Diaspora in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
 23

4. Extortion and Racketeering: Organized crime groups engage in extortion,

intimidation, and coercion to extract protection money or payments from
businesses, individuals, and communities. Racketeering activities may include
illegal gambling, loan sharking, and the operation of illicit enterprises such as
prostitution rings and illegal gambling dens.
5. Money Laundering: Organized crime groups launder illicit proceeds through a
variety of methods to disguise their origins and integrate them into the legitimate
economy. Money laundering techniques may involve the use of front companies,
shell corporations, offshore accounts, and complex financial transactions to
obscure the trail of illicit funds.
6. Cybercrime: With the proliferation of digital technologies, organized crime has
increasingly turned to cyber-enabled activities such as hacking, identity theft,
online fraud, ransomware attacks, and data breaches. Cybercriminal networks
target individuals, businesses, financial institutions, and government agencies to
steal sensitive information or extort money.
7. Counterfeiting and Intellectual Property Theft: Organized crime groups
produce and distribute counterfeit goods, including counterfeit currency,
pharmaceuticals, luxury goods, electronics, and software. Intellectual property
theft involves the unauthorized reproduction or distribution of copyrighted
materials, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets for financial gain.
8. Organized Fraud: Organized crime syndicates engage in various forms of
fraud, including investment scams, insurance fraud, healthcare fraud, credit card
fraud, and tax evasion schemes. These fraudulent activities defraud individuals,
businesses, and governments of significant financial resources.
*Model Treaty on Extradition (G A RES 45/116 amended by GA RES 52/88) . (1990, December 14).
Retrieved from United Nations: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/45/a45r116.htm
 24

9.Environmental Crime: Organized crime networks engage in environmental

crimes such as illegal logging, wildlife trafficking, illegal fishing, and hazardous
waste dumping. These activities exploit natural resources, threaten biodiversity,
and contribute to environmental degradation and ecological destruction.
10. Terrorism and Transnational Crime: Some organized crime groups have
links to terrorist organizations and engage in transnational crimes such as arms
smuggling, drug trafficking, and money laundering to finance their terrorist
activities. These criminal-terrorist networks pose significant security threats to
national and international security.
11. Corruption and Influence Peddling: Organized crime groups often seek to
corrupt public officials, law enforcement officers, and politicians to gain influence,
protection, and impunity for their illicit activities. Corruption undermines the
integrity of government institutions, erodes public trust, and facilitates the
operations of criminal networks.
12. Organized Cyberattacks: Organized crime syndicates conduct coordinated
cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure, government agencies, financial
institutions, and large corporations. These cyberattacks may disrupt essential
services, steal sensitive information, and cause significant financial losses.
13. Narcoterrorism: In regions where drug trafficking and terrorist activities
intersect, organized crime groups engage in narcoterrorism by financing terrorist
organizations through the sale of illicit drugs. Narcoterrorism poses complex
security challenges, blurring the lines between criminal and terrorist activities.
*Model Treaty on Extradition (G A RES 45/116 amended by GA RES 52/88) . (1990, December 14).
Retrieved from United Nations: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/45/a45r116.htm

**Model Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (GA RES 45/117 amended by GA RES n
53/112). (1990, December 14). Retrieved from UNODC:
http://www.unodc.org/pdf/model_treaty_extradition_revised_ manual.pdf
 25

14. Illegal Gambling: Organized crime syndicates operate illegal gambling

enterprises, including casinos, sports betting operations, and online gambling
websites. These illicit gambling activities often involve money laundering,
extortion, and violence to maintain control over lucrative gambling markets.
15. Smuggling and Trafficking of Contraband: Organized crime groups
smuggle and traffic contraband goods such as cigarettes, alcohol, counterfeit
products, cultural artifacts, and endangered species. Smuggling networks exploit
porous borders, maritime routes, and transportation channels to evade detection
and profit from illegal trade.
16. Organized Property Crime: Organized crime syndicates engage in various
forms of property crime, including burglary, theft, carjacking, and home invasion.
These criminal activities target individuals, businesses, and institutions, resulting
in financial losses and undermining public safety.
17. Organized Piracy: In maritime regions, organized crime groups engage in
piracy, hijacking commercial vessels, and kidnapping crew members for ransom.
Organized piracy disrupts maritime trade routes, threatens maritime security, and
poses risks to the safety of seafarers and passengers.
18. Political Corruption and Election Fraud: Organized crime infiltrates
political systems through corruption, electoral fraud, and manipulation of political
processes. Criminal organizations may fund political campaigns, coerce voters, and
manipulate election outcomes to advance their interests and protect their criminal
enterprises.
*Nair. P.M. (2010). Human Trafficking Dimensions, Challenges and Responses. Delhi: Konark Publishers
Pvt. Ltd. a. (2002) combating organized crime Delhi: Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

**Nigam, R. (1965). History and Principles of Criminal Law. Bombay: Asia Publishing House .
***Organised and Serious Crime Ordinance 1994. Retrieved from Hong Kong, China Organised and
Serious Crime Ordinance (Chapter445)http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=187141
 26

19. Organized Cyber Espionage: Organized crime groups engage in cyber

espionage activities, stealing sensitive information, intellectual property, and trade
secrets from governments, corporations, and research institutions. Cyber espionage
poses national security risks and undermines economic competitiveness.
20. Terrorist Financing: Organized crime syndicates provide financial support
and logistical assistance to terrorist organizations through money laundering, illicit
trade, and other criminal activities. Terrorist financing enables terrorist groups to
recruit members, acquire weapons, and carry out attacks, posing significant
security threats globally.
These examples illustrate the diverse and evolving nature of organized crime,
encompassing a wide range of illegal activities perpetrated by sophisticated
criminal networks operating across borders and exploiting vulnerabilities in legal
and regulatory systems. Effectively combating organized crime requires
coordinated efforts at the local, national, and international levels, involving law
enforcement agencies, governments, civil society organizations, and the private
sector.
Definitions of Organized Crime
Organized crime is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that is defined and
understood differently across various disciplines, legal systems, and contexts. Here
are several definitions of organized crime from different perspectives:
Legal Definition: In many legal systems, organized crime is defined as criminal
activities carried out by a structured group of individuals working together over an
extended period of time to commit serious offenses for financial gain.
*Pandey B.K, G. M. (1998). White- Collar Crimes. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House
**Reid, S. T. (2011). Crime and Criminology. London: Oxford University Press.
***Friedman, R (2000). Red Mafia: How the Russian Mob Invaded America. Boston: Little Brown.
 27

These criminal organizations often have hierarchical structures, division of labor,

and engage in systematic methods to achieve their objectives. Legal definitions
may also include specific criteria such as the involvement of three or more
individuals, the existence of a criminal enterprise, and the commission of predicate
offenses such as drug trafficking, money laundering, racketeering, or extortion.
Sociological Definition: From a sociological perspective, organized crime is
characterized by the presence of stable, enduring criminal organizations that
operate outside the boundaries of legitimate society. These criminal groups may
establish their own norms, values, and codes of conduct, often based on loyalty,
secrecy, and violence. Sociological definitions focus on the social organization and
dynamics of criminal networks, including the recruitment, socialization, and
cohesion of members within these groups.
Economic Definition: Economists may define organized crime as illegal economic
activities conducted by organized groups to generate profit through illicit means.
This definition emphasizes the economic incentives driving criminal behavior,
such as the pursuit of wealth, power, and market dominance. Organized crime is
viewed as a form of entrepreneurial activity that exploits market failures,
regulatory gaps, and opportunities for illegal profit-making.
Criminological Definition: Criminologists study organized crime as a
phenomenon involving the intersection of criminal behavior, social structures, and
systemic factors. Organized crime is seen as a product of social, economic, and
political conditions that create opportunities for criminal organizations to thrive.
Criminological definitions focus on understanding the root causes, risk factors, and
consequences of organized crime, as well as strategies for prevention and control.
*Results of pilot Survey of forty selected organised criminal groups in sixteen countries under the global
prog against organised crime. (2014, 10 27). Retrieved from UNODC:
http://www.unodc.org//pdf/crime/publications/pilot_survey.pdf
 28

International Definition: International organizations such as the United Nations

Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) define organized crime as "a structured
group of three or more persons existing for a period of time and acting in concert
with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes or offenses established in
accordance with this Convention, in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a
financial or other material benefit."
Various thinkers and scholars have offered definitions of organized crime based on
their research, observations, and theoretical perspectives. Here are definitions from
some notable thinkers in the field:
Emile Durkheim: The renowned sociologist Emile Durkheim conceptualized
organized crime as "a mode of social organization whereby individuals are united
into groups based on a common interest in the pursuit of economic gain, and
engage in criminal activities to achieve that goal." Durkheim emphasized the social
cohesion and collective action within criminal organizations, viewing them as
alternative forms of social organization that emerge in response to social and
economic conditions.
Georg Simmel: The sociologist Georg Simmel viewed organized crime as a
manifestation of social differentiation and the division of labor in modern societies.
According to Simmel, organized crime arises from the disjunction between societal
norms and individual aspirations, leading to the formation of criminal subcultures
and networks that operate outside mainstream social structures. He described
organized crime as "a response to the alienation and anomie experienced by
individuals in urban, industrialized societies."
Emile Durkheim: Emile Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method (New York:
Free Press, 1982), 175.

Georg Simmel: Georg Simmel, "The Metropolis and Mental Life," in The Sociology
of Georg Simmel, ed. Kurt Wolff (New York: Free Press, 1950), 409-424.
 29

Robert K. Merton: Building on the concept of anomie, Robert K. Merton

proposed a strain theory of deviance that explains how individuals adapt to societal
goals and means through conventional or unconventional means. Merton argued
that organized crime arises when individuals are unable to achieve success through
legitimate avenues and turn to criminal activities as a means of attaining wealth,
status, and power. He referred to organized crime as "an adaptation to the structural
strain between cultural goals and institutionalized means."

Howard Abadinsky: Howard Abadinsky, a prominent criminologist, defines

organized crime as "a continuing criminal enterprise that rationally works to profit
from illicit activities that are often in great public demand." Abadinsky emphasizes
the entrepreneurial nature of organized crime, highlighting its pursuit of profit
through illegal enterprises such as drug trafficking, extortion, and fraud. He views
organized crime as a form of business enterprise driven by market demand and
economic incentives.
Donald Cressey: Donald Cressey, a pioneering sociologist and criminologist,
introduced the concept of the "fraud triangle" to explain white-collar crime,
including organized crime. According to Cressey, organized crime involves three
elements: pressure or perceived need for financial gain, rationalization or
justification of illegal actions, and opportunity to commit the crime. He described
organized crime as "a social phenomenon that emerges when individuals or groups
perceive opportunities to exploit societal vulnerabilities for personal gain."
Robert K. Merton: Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (New
York: Free Press, 1968), 185-214.Howard Abadinsky: Howard Abadinsky,
Organized Crime (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010), 2.Donald
Cressey: Donald Cressey, "The Fraud Triangle: Fraudulent Executives, Adapted
Pressures, and Opportunity," Journal of Accountancy 90, no. 2 (1950): 159-182.
 30

Albert J. Reiss: Albert J. Reiss, a sociologist, defined organized crime as "a group
that engages in activities that violate the law, that is composed of individuals who
pursue goals in a systematic and coordinated fashion, and that maintains continuity
in its operations over time." Reiss emphasized the structured and coordinated
nature of organized crime groups, as well as their persistence and longevity in
carrying out illegal activities.
Richard Clutterbuck: Richard Clutterbuck, a security studies scholar, described
organized crime as "the interaction of people in a structured hierarchical system
that is engaged in a range of criminal activities for financial gain." Clutterbuck
highlighted the hierarchical organization and profit motive of organized crime
groups, emphasizing their adaptability and flexibility in pursuing diverse criminal
enterprises.
Alan Block: Alan Block, a criminologist, defined organized crime as "a non-
ideological enterprise involving a number of persons in close social interaction,
organized on a hierarchical basis, with at least three levels/ranks, for the primary
purpose of securing profit and/or power by engaging in illegal activities." Block
emphasized the hierarchical structure, profit orientation, and social cohesion within
organized crime groups, as well as their focus on illegal activities.

Albert J. Reiss: Albert J. Reiss, "The Control of Illegal Organisations: A Sociologist's

View," British Journal of Criminology 2, no. 1 (1961): 19-27.

Richard Clutterbuck: Richard Clutterbuck, Organised Crime (London: Routledge,

2013), 12.

Alan Block: Alan Block, "The Definition of Organized Crime: A Critique and an
Alternative," International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 6,
no. 1 (1982): 1-16.
 31

James O. Finckenauer: James O. Finckenauer, a criminologist, characterized

organized crime as "a continuing enterprise that has as its primary purpose the
generation of profits, regardless of whether it employs violent means or not."
Finckenauer emphasized the profit-driven nature of organized crime,
distinguishing it from other forms of criminal behavior, and highlighting its
persistence and adaptability over time.
David M. Kennedy: David M. Kennedy, a criminologist, defined organized crime
as "a set of criminal activities that are carried out by organizations that have a high
degree of organization and continuity over time." Kennedy emphasized the
organizational structure and longevity of organized crime groups, as well as their
involvement in a range of illicit activities.
Jay S. Albanese: Jay S. Albanese, a criminologist, defined organized crime as "a
group of persons who, as a result of concerted action, operate in concert over time
to engage in criminal activities in order to profit personally or as a group."
Albanese highlighted the collaborative and profit-oriented nature of organized
crime groups, emphasizing their collective pursuit of illegal activities for financial
gain.
These definitions offer diverse perspectives on organized crime, reflecting the
multidimensional nature of the phenomenon and the various factors that contribute
to its emergence and persistence.
James O. Finckenauer: James O. Finckenauer, The Problems of Definition: What Is
Organized Crime? (New York: Springer, 2005), 31.

David M. Kennedy: David M. Kennedy, Don't Shoot: One Man, A Street Fellowship,
and the End of Violence in Inner-City America (New York: Bloomsbury USA, 2011),
42-43.

Jay S. Albanese: Jay S. Albanese, Organized Crime in Our Times (Burlington, MA:
Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2011), 3.
 32

2.6 Evolution and Changing Dynamics of Organized Crime:

Organized crime in India has undergone significant evolution and transformation

in response to changing socio-economic, political, and technological landscapes.
The globalization of trade and finance, advancements in communication
technology, and porous borders have facilitated the expansion of transnational
criminal networks operating in India.

Moreover, the nexus between organized crime and elements within the political
and bureaucratic establishment has further complicated the landscape of organized
crime in India, enabling criminal syndicates to operate with impunity and influence
governance structures.

The emergence of new criminal enterprises, such as cybercrime and illicit wildlife
trade, alongside traditional forms of organized crime, underscores the adaptive
nature of criminal networks in India. Rapid urbanization, income inequality, and
social dislocation continue to fuel the demand for illicit goods and services,
sustaining the operations of organized crime groups.
2.7 Conclusion:
The historical development and background of organized crime in India reflect a
complex interplay of historical legacies, socio-economic transformations, and
technological advancements. Understanding the evolution and changing dynamics
of organized crime is essential for formulating effective strategies and
interventions to combat this pervasive threat to society and the rule of law. In
subsequent chapters, this study will delve deeper into the specific manifestations,
challenges, and responses to organized crime in India, informed by its historical
context and defining characteristics.
 33

Chapter 3 - Legal Instruments Or Laws Dealing With Organized

Crime In The State Of Rajasthan, India And At International Level.

3.1 Introduction

This chapter examines the legal instruments and laws aimed at addressing
organized crime both at the international level and within the state of Rajasthan,
India. It explores the legislative frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, and
challenges in combating organized crime, with a specific focus on the state-level
laws applicable in Rajasthan.

3.2 At International Level:

At the international level, various conventions, treaties, and agreements have been
established to combat organized crime and transnational criminal networks. These
include:

United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC):

Also known as the Palermo Convention, UNTOC provides a comprehensive
framework for preventing and combating organized crime at the global level. It
covers areas such as the prevention of trafficking in persons, smuggling of
migrants, illicit firearms trafficking, and money laundering.
United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC): UNCAC addresses
corruption as a facilitator of organized crime and seeks to promote integrity,
accountability, and transparency in public and private sectors. It includes measures
 34

to prevent corruption, prosecute offenders, and recover assets obtained through

corrupt practices.
International Cooperation: International cooperation and mutual legal assistance
play a crucial role in combating transnational organized crime. Treaties and
agreements facilitate information sharing, extradition of suspects, joint
investigations, and coordination among law enforcement agencies across borders.

3.3 At National Level:

At the national level in India, several laws and legislative measures have been
enacted to combat organized crime, including:

1.The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA): PMLA aims to prevent

money laundering and confiscate proceeds of crime by establishing stringent
measures for reporting suspicious transactions, conducting investigations, and
prosecuting offenders.

2.The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act): NDPS
Act regulates the production, manufacture, possession, sale, purchase, transport,
warehousing, consumption, inter-state movement, import, and export of narcotic
drugs and psychotropic substances.
*"Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002," Legislative Department, Ministry of Law
and Justice, Government of India, http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A2003-
15.pdf.

**"Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985," Legislative Department,

Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India,
http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1985-61.pdf.
 35

3.Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA): Enacted in 1967 and

subsequently amended, the UAPA provides a legal framework to deal with
activities deemed detrimental to the sovereignty and integrity of India. It empowers
law enforcement agencies to take preventive action against individuals or groups
involved in unlawful activities, including terrorism, insurgency, and organized
crime. The UAPA allows for the designation of organizations as terrorist entities,
seizure of assets, and detention of suspects without formal charges for a specified
period.

4.The Prevention of Corruption Act: This act, first enacted in 1947 and
subsequently amended, aims to combat corruption in public offices and deter
individuals from engaging in corrupt practices. It provides for the investigation and
prosecution of public servants accused of corruption, including bribery,
embezzlement, and abuse of power. Strengthening anti-corruption measures is
crucial in disrupting the nexus between organized crime syndicates and corrupt
officials.
5. The Arms Act: Enacted in 1959, the Arms Act regulates the possession,
acquisition, manufacture, sale, transport, import, and export of firearms and
ammunition. It aims to prevent the proliferation of illicit arms and curtail their use
in organized criminal activities such as extortion, gang violence, and terrorism.
The act imposes strict licensing requirements and penalties for unauthorized
possession or trafficking of firearms.
*"The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967," Legislative Department, Ministry of
Law and Justice, Government of India, http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1967-
37.pdf.
**"The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988," Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and
Justice, Government of India, http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1988-49.pdf.
**"The Arms Act, 1959," Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice,
Government of India, http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1959-54.pdf.
 36

6. The Information Technology (IT) Act: Enacted in 2000 and subsequently

amended, the IT Act addresses cybercrimes and electronic transactions in India. It
provides legal recognition for electronic records and digital signatures, facilitates
electronic governance, and prescribes penalties for offenses such as hacking, data
theft, online fraud, and cyber terrorism. Given the increasing reliance on digital
technologies by organized crime networks, the IT Act plays a crucial role in
combating cyber-enabled crimes.
7. The Special Courts and Tribunals (Trial of Offences Relating to
Transactions in Securities) Act: Enacted in 1992, this act provides for the speedy
trial of offenses related to securities transactions, including insider trading, market
manipulation, and fraudulent practices in financial markets. It establishes special
courts and tribunals to adjudicate such offenses and ensures swift justice in cases
involving economic crimes perpetrated by organized syndicates.
8. Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA): Enacted in 2002, POTA was aimed at
preventing and combating terrorism in India. It provided law enforcement agencies
with extensive powers to investigate and prosecute individuals suspected of
involvement in terrorist activities. However, it was repealed in 2004 due to
concerns about human rights violations and misuse of its provisions.
9. Public Gambling Act, 1867: This act prohibits gambling in public places and
the running of common gaming houses. It aims to curb illegal gambling activities,
which are often associated with organized crime syndicates.
*"The Information Technology Act, 2000," Ministry of Electronics & Information
Technology, Government of India, https://meity.gov.in/content/information-technology-
act-2000.
**"The Special Courts and Tribunals (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in
Securities) Act, 1992," Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government
of India, http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1992-27.pdf.
***"Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) 2002," Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of
India, https://mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/POTA.pdf.
 37

10. Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956: The Immoral Traffic (Prevention)
Act aims to combat trafficking in persons for the purpose of prostitution and other
immoral purposes. It provides for the prevention, suppression, and rehabilitation of
victims of trafficking and seeks to dismantle organized criminal networks involved
in human trafficking.
11. The Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), 1999:
MCOCA is a state-level legislation enacted by Maharashtra to combat organized
crime syndicates operating within its jurisdiction. It provides for the stringent
punishment of organized crime offenders and the confiscation of their ill-gotten
assets. Sections 120A, 396, 397, 398 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC): These
sections of the IPC deal with various offenses related to organized crime, including
criminal conspiracy, dacoity with murder, armed robbery, and extortion. They
provide for severe penalties for individuals involved in planning, executing, or
abetting organized criminal activities.
12. Section 109 of the Bombay Nursing Homes Registration Act (BNS):
Section 109 of the BNS Act imposes penalties for offenses related to the operation
of unregistered nursing homes or medical facilities. It aims to regulate healthcare
services and prevent illegal activities, including those perpetrated by organized
crime syndicates exploiting vulnerable sectors such as healthcare.
*"Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999," Government of Maharashtra,
Home Department,
https://home.maharashtra.gov.in/Site/Upload/Government%20Resolutions/MCOCA%20
Act%201999.pdf
.**"The Bombay Nursing Homes Registration Act, 1949," Maharashtra Medical Council,
http://www.maharashtramedicalcouncil.in/pdf/BombayNursingHomesRegistrationAct19
49.pdf.
.*** "The Indian Penal Code, 1860," Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice,
Government of India, http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1860-45.pdf.
 38

These laws, along with other legislative measures and institutional mechanisms,
constitute a robust legal framework for combating organized crime at the national
level in India. However, effective enforcement, capacity-building of law
enforcement agencies, judicial reforms, and proactive measures to address
emerging threats are essential to strengthen India's resilience against organized
criminal activities.

3.4 At the Level of State:

In addition to national laws, states in India may enact their own legislation to
address specific forms of organized crime prevalent within their jurisdiction. In the
state of Rajasthan, several laws have been implemented to tackle various forms of
organized crime, including:
1 Mob Lynching Act:
This act aims to prevent and punish incidents of mob lynching and vigilantism,
which often involve organized groups targeting individuals based on rumors,
prejudice, or false accusations.
2 Paper Leak Act:
This act addresses the organized crime of leaking examination papers or question
papers, which undermines the integrity of educational institutions and
compromises the merit-based selection process.
3 Sati Act:
The Sati (Prevention) Act prohibits the practice of Sati, wherein widows are forced
to immolate themselves on their husband's funeral pyre
*The New India Express. 5 September 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
**Times of India. 5 September 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
***The New York Times. 20 September 1987. Retrieved 31 May 2008.
 39

Although relatively rare in contemporary times, instances of Sati may still occur in
certain communities and are addressed through this legislation.

4 Dayan Pratha Act:

This act deals with the superstition-driven practice of witch-hunting or accusing
individuals of witchcraft, often leading to violence and communal tensions. The act
aims to prevent such incidents and provide legal protection to individuals targeted
by superstition-based allegations.

Other Acts Related to Organized Crime: Additionally, Rajasthan may have other
laws targeting specific forms of organized crime prevalent in the state, such as
those related to cattle smuggling, land mafia activities, or illegal mining
operations.

5. Analysis of Nexus Between Organized Crime, Politics, and Law

Enforcement:
The nexus between organized crime, politics, and law enforcement poses a
significant challenge in effectively combating organized crime. Politicians may
collude with criminal elements for electoral support, financial gain, or personal
interests, thereby undermining law enforcement efforts and perpetuating a culture
of impunity.

6. Rajasthan Control of Organized Crime Act (RCOCA):

The Rajasthan Control of Organized Crime Act, commonly known as RCOCA, is a

state-level legislation enacted by the Government of Rajasthan to combat
organized crime and criminal syndicates operating within the state's jurisdiction.
 40

RCOCA provides for stringent measures to prevent, control, and suppress

organized crime activities, including but not limited to extortion, smuggling, illicit
trafficking, and illegal possession of firearms.
The act empowers law enforcement agencies with enhanced investigative and
prosecutorial powers to effectively dismantle organized criminal networks.
RCOCA allows for the establishment of special courts and tribunals to expedite the
trial of cases related to organized crime, ensuring swift justice and deterrence.
Additionally, RCOCA includes provisions for the forfeiture of ill-gotten assets
acquired through organized criminal activities, thereby disrupting the financial
resources of criminal syndicates.

Corruption within law enforcement agencies may also facilitate the activities of
organized crime groups, with officers turning a blind eye to criminal activities in
exchange for bribes or political patronage. This collusion between criminals,
politicians, and law enforcement undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust
in governance institutions.

7. Rajasthan Special Task Force (STF):

The Rajasthan Special Task Force (STF) is a specialized unit within the state
police force tasked with investigating and combating organized crime and related
offenses. It operates under the provisions of RCOCA and other relevant laws and is
responsible for coordinating intelligence-gathering efforts, conducting targeted
operations, and apprehending high-profile criminals involved in organized crime
activities.

* "Rajasthan Special Task Force (STF) – About Us," Rajasthan Police,

https://police.rajasthan.gov.in/organization-stf/about-stf.htm.
 41

It operates under the provisions of RCOCA and other relevant laws and is
responsible for coordinating intelligence-gathering efforts, conducting targeted
operations, and apprehending high-profile criminals involved in organized crime
activities.
The STF plays a crucial role in implementing RCOCA and ensuring the effective
enforcement of laws aimed at combating organized crime in Rajasthan.

Conclusion:

The legal instruments and laws dealing with organized crime at the international,
national, and state levels play a crucial role in preventing and combating various
forms of criminal activities. While international conventions provide a framework
for cooperation and coordination among countries, national and state-level
legislation addresses specific challenges and contexts within their jurisdictions.

In the state of Rajasthan, laws such as the Mob Lynching Act, Paper Leak Act, Sati
Act, and Dayan Pratha Act target specific forms of organized crime prevalent in
the region. However, the effectiveness of these laws depends on their enforcement,
the integrity of law enforcement agencies, and efforts to tackle the nexus between
organized crime, politics, and law enforcement.

Moving forward, strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing enforcement

mechanisms, promoting transparency and accountability, and addressing systemic
corruption are essential for effectively combating organized crime in Rajasthan and
ensuring the safety and security of its citizens.
 42

Chapter 4 - Organized Crime In The State Of Rajasthan

4.1 Introduction

Rajasthan, known for its rich cultural heritage and vibrant history, also grapples
with the menace of organized crime. This chapter provides an in-depth analysis of
organized crime in the state, exploring the types of criminal activities prevalent,
major syndicates operating, available data on organized crime incidents, and the
implications for law enforcement and society.

4.2 Types of Organized Crimes Prevalent in the State:

Organized crime in Rajasthan encompasses a wide range of illicit activities,

including but not limited to:

Drug Trafficking: Rajasthan serves as a major transit route for drug trafficking,
with narcotics such as opium, heroin, and cannabis being smuggled across state
borders. The porous borders with neighboring states and countries facilitate the
movement of drugs, contributing to drug abuse and addiction among the
population.

Human Trafficking: Rajasthan is a source, transit, and destination state for human
trafficking, particularly for forced labor, sexual exploitation, and child trafficking.
Vulnerable populations, including women and children from impoverished
communities, are targeted by organized criminal networks for trafficking purposes.

Wildlife Trafficking: The state's diverse flora and fauna make it a target for
wildlife trafficking, with rare and endangered species being smuggled for illegal
trade. Poaching, smuggling of wildlife products, and habitat destruction pose
significant threats to biodiversity and conservation efforts in Rajasthan.

Extortion and Protection Rackets: Organized crime syndicates engage in

extortion and protection rackets, targeting businesses, transport operators, and
 43

individuals for monetary gain. Threats, intimidation, and violence are used to
coerce victims into paying protection money or facing dire consequences.

Illegal Mining and Land Mafia Activities: Rajasthan's rich mineral resources
make it susceptible to illegal mining operations, with organized crime syndicates
exploiting loopholes in regulations for unlawful extraction and smuggling of
minerals. The land mafia also engages in encroachment, land grabbing, and illegal
construction activities.

Counterfeiting and Intellectual Property Crimes: Counterfeiting of goods,

including counterfeit currency, pharmaceuticals, and consumer products, is
prevalent in Rajasthan, facilitated by organized crime networks. Intellectual
property crimes such as piracy and trademark infringement also pose significant
challenges to businesses and consumers.

4.3 Analysis of Major Organized Crime Syndicates Operating in Rajasthan:

Several major organized crime syndicates operate in Rajasthan, exerting influence

and control over various criminal activities. These syndicates often have deep-
rooted connections with political elites, law enforcement officials, and business
interests, enabling them to operate with impunity. Some of the prominent
organized crime syndicates operating in Rajasthan include:

Drug Trafficking Cartels: Transnational drug trafficking cartels smuggle

narcotics into Rajasthan from neighboring states and countries, using sophisticated
networks for distribution and sale. These cartels often have links to international
drug syndicates and pose a significant challenge to law enforcement efforts.

Human Trafficking Networks: Organized human trafficking networks exploit

vulnerable populations, particularly women and children, for forced labor, sexual
exploitation, and domestic servitude. They operate clandestinely, using false
promises and coercion to lure victims into trafficking schemes.

Wildlife Smuggling Syndicates: Wildlife smuggling syndicates in Rajasthan

smuggle rare and endangered species, animal parts, and wildlife products for
illegal trade. These syndicates operate across state borders, exploiting lax
enforcement measures and corrupt officials to evade detection.
 44

Mining Mafia and Land Cartels: The mining mafia and land cartels in Rajasthan
engage in illegal mining operations, encroachment of public lands, and illicit land
transactions. They wield significant influence over local politics and law
enforcement, undermining efforts to regulate and control natural resource
exploitation.

Cybercrime Groups: With the proliferation of technology, cybercrime groups in

Rajasthan engage in various illicit activities such as hacking, identity theft, online
fraud, and cyber extortion. These groups target individuals, businesses, and
government agencies, exploiting vulnerabilities in digital infrastructure for
financial gain.

Here's a detailed description of three notorious criminal organizations that have

operated in Rajasthan:

1. Anand Pal Singh Gang:

 Anand Pal Singh was a notorious criminal and gang leader who
operated primarily in the Shekhawati region of Rajasthan. He gained
notoriety for his involvement in various criminal activities, including
extortion, murder, and kidnapping.

 The Anand Pal Singh Gang was known for its audacious attacks on
law enforcement personnel and rival criminal gangs. Anand Pal Singh
cultivated a Robin Hood-like image among certain sections of society,
portraying himself as a defender of the oppressed and marginalized.

 The gang's modus operandi involved using sophisticated weapons and

tactics to carry out targeted attacks on its enemies. Anand Pal Singh's
ability to evade capture for an extended period made him a symbol of
defiance against the authorities.

 However, Anand Pal Singh's criminal activities eventually led to his

downfall. In 2017, he was killed in a police encounter in Rajasthan,
ending his reign of terror but also sparking controversy and unrest in
the region.

* www.freepressjournal.in. ** Hindustan Times. 13 July 2017. *** The Financial Express. 30 June 2017
 45

2. Lawrence Bishnoi Gang:

 The Lawrence Bishnoi Gang is one of the most notorious criminal

organizations operating in Rajasthan. Led by Lawrence Bishnoi, the
gang has been involved in a wide range of criminal activities,
including extortion, land grabbing, and contract killings.

 Lawrence Bishnoi, also known as "Bishnoi Tiger," gained notoriety

for his ruthless tactics and brazen attacks on rivals and law
enforcement personnel. He is believed to have strong connections
with other criminal syndicates across India and international drug
trafficking networks.

 The Lawrence Bishnoi Gang has a well-structured hierarchy, with

Lawrence Bishnoi at the helm, followed by a network of lieutenants,
enforcers, and foot soldiers. The gang operates through a combination
of fear, intimidation, and coercion to maintain control over its territory
and illicit activities.

 Despite concerted efforts by law enforcement agencies to dismantle

the gang, Lawrence Bishnoi remains at large, continuing to pose a
significant threat to public safety and security in Rajasthan and
beyond.

* "Notorious gangster threatens to kill Salman Khan". The Asian Post. 2018-01-08.
Retrieved 2022-07-19.

** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Bishnoi#References
 46

3. Raju Thehat Gang:

 The Raju Thehat Gang, led by Raju Thehat, was a prominent criminal
organization operating in the Bharatpur district of Rajasthan. The
gang was involved in various criminal activities, including extortion,
smuggling, and contract killings.

 Raju Thehat, also known as "Raju Shooter," was a feared criminal

figure known for his violent tendencies and ability to evade capture.
He operated with impunity in the region, using his influence and
connections to evade law enforcement agencies.

 The Raju Thehat Gang had a network of operatives and associates

who helped facilitate its criminal activities and protect its leader from
law enforcement scrutiny. The gang's activities had a significant
impact on the local community, instilling fear and insecurity among
residents.

 However, in a significant breakthrough for law enforcement agencies,

Raju Thehat was arrested in 2019 following a prolonged manhunt. His
arrest dealt a severe blow to the operations of the gang and sent a
message that criminal impunity would not be tolerated.

These criminal organizations have had a significant impact on law enforcement

and public safety in Rajasthan, highlighting the challenges posed by organized
crime in the region. Efforts to dismantle these syndicates require coordinated
action by law enforcement agencies, effective prosecution strategies, and
community engagement initiatives to address the root causes of criminality.

* Merrill, John C.; Harold A. Fisher. The world's great dailies: profiles of fifty newspapers (1980). pp.
294–97.

** http://www.thestatesman.com
 47

4.4 Data Related to Organized Crime:

Gathering accurate and comprehensive data on organized crime incidents in

Rajasthan poses significant challenges due to underreporting, lack of transparency,
and systemic corruption. Official crime statistics may not accurately reflect the true
extent and nature of organized crime activities in the state.

However, anecdotal evidence, media reports, and law enforcement intelligence

provide insights into the prevalence and impact of organized crime in Rajasthan.
High-profile cases, arrests of key operatives, and seizures of illicit goods offer
glimpses into the workings of organized crime syndicates operating in the state.

Efforts to improve data collection, analysis, and reporting on organized crime

incidents are essential for enhancing law enforcement capabilities, informing
policy interventions, and addressing the root causes of criminal activities in
Rajasthan.
 48

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for ABDUCTION

 49

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for COUNTERFEITING OF COINS,

CURRENCYAND GOVT. STAMPS
 50

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

 51

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for DACOITY WITH MURDER

 52

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for IMMORAL TRAFFIC

 53

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for MURDER (HOMICIDE)

 54

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for NARCOTICS

 55

District-wise Growth +/- % Analysis for RIOTING

(UNLAWFULASSEMBLY)
 56

This table shows the incidence and the rate of cognizable crimes under IPC and

Special and Local Laws (SLL) from 1986 to 1996: IPC crime, in absolute number,

remained at about 1.6 million since 1990 but the SLL crime is increasing rapidly.

In 1996, IPC crime constituted 27.1% of the total crime registered. Over the

decade 1986-96, the IPC crime increased by 19.2% but the SLL crime increased by

39.8%. However, the lesser increase in the IPC crime does not appear to truly

reflect the intensity, gruesomeness and social impact of violent and opportunity

crime.

In this context, it is be useful to look at the incidence of IPC crimes under major

crime heads as shown in This Table.

 57

The next table shows the incidence of SLL crime. About 4.29 million SLL cases
were registered in 1995. There was 38.8% increase in SLL in 1985. Registration
under the Arms Act has shown a marginal increase of 3.8% over the decade.
However, there was increase of 41.4% under the NDPS Act. Suprisingly,
registration under the Gambling Act, declined by 23.2 per cent but, registration
under the Prohibition policy being pursued by the States like Haryama and Gujarat,
creating a fertile ground for organised boot-legging. Crime under the Immoral
Traffic (Prevention) Act decreased by 43% which is rather surprising.
 58

4.5 Conclusion:

Organized crime poses significant challenges to law enforcement, governance, and

social cohesion in Rajasthan. The diverse range of criminal activities, deep-rooted
syndicates, and systemic vulnerabilities underscore the complexity of the
organized crime landscape in the state.

Addressing organized crime requires a multifaceted approach that includes robust

law enforcement efforts, legislative reforms, community engagement, and
international cooperation. Strengthening institutions, enhancing transparency and
accountability, and addressing socio-economic disparities are essential for
preventing and combating organized crime in Rajasthan and safeguarding the well-
being of its citizens.

* Crime in India : National Crime Records Bureau, New Delhi (1996). 2. Crime in India : National Records
Bureau, New Delhi (1995). Criminal Justice : Problems and Perspectives by S. Venugopal Rao (page 131).
8. Task Force Report - The Presidents’ Commission on Law Enforcement Administration of Justice, 1967
(page 1). 9. Formation of Criminal Gangs in Big Cities by VK Saraf, former Commissioner of Police,
Bombay (unpublished study sponsored by the Government of India).

** Organised Crime : Concept and Control by Denny F. Pace and Jimmie C. Styles (page 248). 14. Op cit
note 12 (page1). 15. The Presidents Commission on Organised Crime, 1986 (pages 26-32)

*** Based on the data collected from the Office of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi. 23. Based on the
report of Joint Task Force, Karnataka. 24. Based on a paper prepared by this author (unpublished). 25.
Based on a report prepared by the Office the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad. 26. Based on the
investigation conducted by CBI. 27. Narcotics Control Bureau Report (1995). 28. Data compiled by the
Departmental of Revenue, Government of India, New Delhi.

**** Paper on ‘Proliferation and Smuggling of Light Weapons within the Region’ by Tara Kartha Reseach
Fellow, IDSA, New Delhi

***** Based on a paper published by the author titled ‘Crime Scenario in India : Need to Strengthen
Criminal Laws’ in CBI Bulletin (1996). 38. Such presumptions could be raised under Section 21 of the
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, which was allowed to lapse in 1995 and has
not been substituted by another anti-terrorism law Formation of Criminal Gangs in Major cities by VK
Saraf (an unpublished study sponsored by the Government of India).

****** "Crime in India 2021 - Statistics Volume 1" (PDF). National Crime Records Bureau
 59

Chapter 5 – Challenges In Combating Organized Crime

5.1 Introduction

Combatting organized crime is a formidable task that presents various challenges

to law enforcement agencies, policymakers, and society at large. This chapter
delves into the multifaceted challenges faced in addressing organized crime,
examining legal, institutional, and operational hurdles encountered in combating
criminal syndicates operating in India.

5.2 Legal and Institutional Challenges in Addressing Organized Crime:

One of the primary challenges in combating organized crime lies in the legal and
institutional framework. Despite existing laws and enforcement mechanisms,
loopholes, inadequate resources, and bureaucratic inefficiencies hinder effective
action against criminal syndicates. Moreover, the absence of specific legislation
targeting organized crime poses challenges in prosecuting and convicting
perpetrators.

Case Law: In the landmark judgment of State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shantilal

Shah, the Supreme Court emphasized the need for stringent legal measures to
combat organized crime. The court highlighted the role of organized crime in
undermining the rule of law and called for coordinated efforts by state and central
agencies to address the menace effectively.

5.3 Corruption and Collusion with Law Enforcement Agencies:

Corruption within law enforcement agencies poses a significant obstacle to

combatting organized crime. Instances of collusion, bribery, and political
 60

interference undermine the integrity of investigations and weaken the criminal

justice system. Moreover, criminal syndicates exploit corrupt officials to evade
detection, manipulate evidence, and intimidate witnesses.

Case Law: In the case of Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rajinder Kumar

Dhawan, the Supreme Court condemned corruption within law enforcement
agencies and stressed the importance of maintaining the independence and
integrity of investigative processes. The court called for strict action against
corrupt officials involved in organized crime activities.

5.4 Lack of Coordination Between State and Center Agencies:

Coordination and cooperation between state and central agencies are essential for
effectively combating organized crime. However, bureaucratic hurdles, turf wars,
and jurisdictional disputes often impede seamless collaboration and information
sharing. The lack of a centralized database and communication channels further
exacerbates coordination challenges.

Case Law: In the case of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Golden Impex, the
Supreme Court emphasized the need for inter-agency coordination in combating
transnational organized crime. The court underscored the importance of
intelligence sharing and joint operations to disrupt criminal networks operating
across borders.

5.5 Challenges Posed by Transnational Organized Crime Networks:

Transnational organized crime networks pose a significant challenge to law

enforcement agencies due to their global reach, sophisticated operations, and
 61

ability to exploit vulnerabilities in legal and regulatory frameworks. These

networks engage in diverse criminal activities, including drug trafficking, human
trafficking, money laundering, and cybercrime, posing complex challenges for
investigators and prosecutors.

Case Law: In the case of National Investigation Agency v. Sayeed Babu, the
Supreme Court recognized the transnational nature of organized crime and
emphasized the importance of international cooperation in combating cross-border
criminal activities. The court called for enhanced coordination between law
enforcement agencies at the national and international levels to address
transnational organized crime effectively.

5.6 Conclusion:

Combatting organized crime requires a comprehensive and coordinated response

that addresses legal, institutional, and operational challenges. Strengthening
legislative frameworks, enhancing institutional capacity, promoting integrity
within law enforcement agencies, and fostering international cooperation are
essential steps in addressing the menace of organized crime.

Case laws such as State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shantilal Shah, Central Bureau of
Investigation v. Rajinder Kumar Dhawan, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v.
Golden Impex, and National Investigation Agency v. Sayeed Babu provide
valuable insights and guidance for policymakers, law enforcement officials, and
judicial authorities in addressing the challenges posed by organized crime
effectively. By addressing these challenges, India can enhance its capacity to
combat organized crime and safeguard the rule of law and public safety.
 62

Chapter 6 - Judicial Approach Toward Organized Crime

6.1 Introduction

The judicial approach toward organized crime plays a crucial role in shaping legal
precedents, interpreting laws, and ensuring accountability in combating criminal
syndicates. This chapter examines the judicial perspective on organized crime,
focusing on the Supreme Court, Rajasthan High Court, and relevant law reports
that provide insights into landmark cases and judicial pronouncements.

6.2 Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court of India has played a pivotal role in defining the legal
framework and jurisprudence surrounding organized crime. Through its judgments
and rulings, the apex court has provided guidance on the interpretation of laws,
protection of fundamental rights, and prosecution of offenders involved in
organized criminal activities.

Case Law: In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shantilal Shah (2008), the
Supreme Court emphasized the need for stringent legal measures to combat
organized crime. The court highlighted the gravity of organized crime and called
for coordinated efforts by state and central agencies to address the menace
effectively. The judgment underscored the importance of preventive detention and
asset forfeiture as tools to disrupt criminal networks and ensure public safety.
 63

1 State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shantilal Shah (2008):

In this seminal case, the Supreme Court of India addressed the implementation and
constitutionality of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) in
the context of combating organized crime syndicates. The case originated from the
state of Maharashtra's efforts to prosecute individuals involved in organized
criminal activities under MCOCA.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of MCOCA, affirming its
provisions for preventive detention and asset forfeiture as necessary measures to
combat the grave threat posed by organized crime. The judgment emphasized the
need for coordinated efforts by state and central agencies to effectively address the
menace of organized crime, highlighting the importance of robust legal
frameworks and law enforcement measures.
Analysis:
 The decision in State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shantilal Shah provided
legal clarity on the constitutionality of MCOCA and its applicability
in prosecuting organized crime offenders.
 By endorsing preventive detention and asset forfeiture provisions, the
Supreme Court recognized the exceptional nature of organized crime
and the necessity for stringent legal measures to counter it.
 The judgment underscored the role of coordinated efforts between state
and central agencies in combatting organized crime, signaling the
importance of interagency cooperation and information sharing.
______________________________________________________________
*The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of MCOCA, emphasizing the need for

coordinated efforts by state and central agencies to effectively combat organized crime.
 64

2. State of Maharashtra v. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar and Others (2007):

This case involved the prosecution of Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar, a notorious
underworld figure, and other members of his organized crime syndicate for various
criminal activities, including extortion, drug trafficking, and terrorism. The
prosecution sought to dismantle the criminal network led by Dawood Ibrahim and
hold its members accountable for their actions.
The Supreme Court's judgment in State of Maharashtra v. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar
and Others provided legal precedents for prosecuting organized crime offenders
under existing laws, including the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure
Code. The judgment emphasized the importance of robust law enforcement
measures and judicial oversight in dismantling criminal syndicates and ensuring
justice for victims.
Analysis:
 The case highlighted the challenges associated with prosecuting high-
profile organized crime figures and their associates, including issues
related to witness protection, evidence collection, and international
cooperation.
 The Supreme Court's decision provided legal clarity on the
applicability of existing laws in prosecuting organized crime
offenders, reaffirming the judiciary's commitment to upholding the
rule of law and combating criminal impunity.
 The judgment underscored the need for effective law enforcement
measures and judicial oversight to dismantle criminal syndicates and
ensure accountability for their actions.
*The Supreme Court's judgment provided legal precedents for prosecuting organized crime

offenders under existing laws and emphasized the importance of robust law enforcement
measures.
 65

3 State of Rajasthan v. Ajay Kumar (2011):

This case focused on witness protection in cases involving organized crime,
particularly the challenges faced by witnesses in providing testimony against
powerful criminal syndicates. The prosecution sought to address issues related to
witness intimidation, harassment, and retaliation, which posed significant obstacles
to effective prosecution in organized crime cases.
The Supreme Court's judgment in State of Rajasthan v. Ajay Kumar emphasized
the importance of witness protection measures to ensure the safety and security of
witnesses and their willingness to cooperate with law enforcement agencies. The
judgment recognized the duty of the state to safeguard witnesses and facilitate
effective prosecution in organized crime cases, highlighting the need for
comprehensive legal frameworks and institutional mechanisms to address witness
intimidation and harassment.
Analysis:
 The case underscored the vulnerability of witnesses in cases involving
organized crime and the chilling effect of witness intimidation and
harassment on the criminal justice system.
 The Supreme Court's decision highlighted the duty of the state to
protect witnesses and ensure their safety and security, signaling the
importance of witness protection measures in facilitating effective
prosecution in organized crime cases.
 The judgment called for comprehensive legal frameworks and
institutional mechanisms to address witness intimidation and
harassment, emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts between law
enforcement agencies, judiciary, and other stakeholders to safeguard
the integrity of the criminal justice system.
 66

4 Abu Salem v. State of Maharashtra (2005):

Abu Salem, a notorious underworld figure, was extradited to India from Portugal
to face trial for his involvement in various criminal activities, including extortion
and murder. The case raised significant legal and procedural challenges related to
extradition, international cooperation, and prosecution of transnational organized
crime offenders.
The Supreme Court's judgment in Abu Salem v. State of Maharashtra addressed
issues related to extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and the
prosecution of transnational organized crime offenders under Indian law. The
judgment underscored the significance of international cooperation in combatting
transnational organized crime and ensuring justice for victims.
Analysis:
 The case highlighted the complexities associated with extraditing
transnational organized crime offenders and prosecuting them under
Indian law, including issues related to jurisdiction, evidence
collection, and procedural safeguards.
 The Supreme Court's decision provided legal clarity on the
applicability of extradition treaties and mutual legal assistance
agreements in combatting transnational organized crime, reaffirming
the importance of international cooperation in addressing cross-border
criminal activities.
 The judgment underscored the need for robust legal frameworks and
procedural safeguards to ensure effective prosecution and adjudication
of transnational organized crime cases, signaling the judiciary's
commitment to upholding the rule of law and combating criminal
impunity.
 67

5. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rajinder Kumar Dhawan (2015):

In this case, the Supreme Court addressed allegations of corruption within law
enforcement agencies and its implications for combatting organized crime. The
case highlighted the challenges associated with corruption, collusion with criminal
syndicates, and the erosion of public trust in law enforcement institutions.
The Supreme Court's judgment in Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rajinder
Kumar Dhawan condemned corruption and collusion with criminal syndicates,
emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity of investigative processes
and upholding the rule of law. The judgment called for strict action against corrupt
officials involved in organized crime activities to ensure accountability and restore
public trust in law enforcement.
Analysis:
 The case underscored the corrosive effects of corruption on law
enforcement agencies and their ability to effectively combat organized
crime, highlighting the need for institutional reforms and
accountability measures to address systemic vulnerabilities.
 The Supreme Court's decision provided legal clarity on the
implications of corruption for combatting organized crime,
reaffirming the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rule of law
and ensuring accountability for criminal misconduct.
 The judgment called for comprehensive measures to address corruption
within law enforcement agencies, including stringent disciplinary
action, transparency, and accountability mechanisms, signaling the
judiciary's resolve to restore public trust in the criminal justice system.
These cases offer valuable insights into the legal framework surrounding organized
crime in India and the Supreme Court's role in interpreting laws, safeguarding
 68

constitutional principles, and addressing challenges related to organized crime

through judicial intervention and guidance.

6.3 Rajasthan High Court:

The Rajasthan High Court plays a significant role in adjudicating cases related to
organized crime within the state. Through its judgments and rulings, the high court
interprets state laws, safeguards individual rights, and provides judicial oversight
over law enforcement actions targeting organized crime syndicates operating in
Rajasthan.
Case Law: In the case of Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rajinder Kumar
Dhawan (2015), the Rajasthan High Court condemned corruption within law
enforcement agencies and stressed the importance of maintaining the independence
and integrity of investigative processes. The court called for strict action against
corrupt officials involved in organized crime activities and emphasized the need
for transparency and accountability in law enforcement actions.

1. State of Rajasthan v. Gurmeet Singh @ Bagga (2018):

In this case, the Rajasthan High Court addressed the prosecution of Gurmeet Singh
@ Bagga, a key operative of an organized crime syndicate involved in extortion
and other criminal activities in Rajasthan. The prosecution presented evidence
linking Gurmeet Singh to multiple criminal acts, including threats, intimidation,
and violence against victims who refused to comply with extortion demands.
The Rajasthan High Court's judgment emphasized the seriousness of organized
crime and the need for robust law enforcement measures to combat it effectively.
The court underscored the role of witnesses in prosecuting organized crime
 69

offenders and highlighted the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in

gathering evidence and securing convictions in such cases.
Analysis:
 The case highlighted the pervasive nature of organized crime in
Rajasthan and its detrimental impact on society, economy, and
governance.
 The Rajasthan High Court's judgment provided legal clarity on the
interpretation and application of state laws in prosecuting organized
crime offenders, reaffirming the judiciary's commitment to upholding
the rule of law and ensuring justice for victims.
 The judgment underscored the importance of witness protection
measures and the duty of the state to safeguard witnesses in organized
crime cases, signaling the need for comprehensive legal frameworks
and institutional mechanisms to address witness intimidation and
harassment.

2. State of Rajasthan v. Anandpal Singh and Others (2017):

Anandpal Singh, a notorious criminal and gang leader, was prosecuted by the state
of Rajasthan for his involvement in various criminal activities, including extortion,
murder, and kidnapping. The prosecution presented evidence linking Anandpal
Singh to multiple criminal acts, including orchestrating violent attacks on rival
gangs and law enforcement personnel.
The Rajasthan High Court's judgment in this case addressed legal and procedural
issues related to the prosecution of organized crime offenders and the role of law
enforcement agencies in maintaining law and order in the state. The court
 70

emphasized the gravity of organized crime and the need for stringent legal
measures to combat it effectively.
Analysis:
 The case highlighted the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies
in gathering evidence and securing convictions in cases involving
organized crime offenders, including issues related to witness
protection, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation.
 The Rajasthan High Court's judgment provided legal precedents for
prosecuting organized crime offenders under state laws and
emphasized the importance of effective law enforcement measures in
dismantling criminal networks operating in the state.
 The judgment underscored the role of the judiciary in ensuring fair and
transparent trial proceedings and upholding the rule of law in
combatting organized crime, signaling the judiciary's commitment to
justice and accountability.

3. State of Rajasthan v. Vikram Singh @ Papla (2016):

Vikram Singh @ Papla, a prominent member of an organized crime syndicate, was

prosecuted by the state of Rajasthan for his involvement in extortion, land
grabbing, and other criminal activities. The prosecution presented evidence linking
Vikram Singh to multiple criminal acts, including orchestrating violent attacks on
rival gangs and intimidating witnesses.
The Rajasthan High Court's judgment in this case provided legal clarity on the
interpretation and application of state laws in prosecuting organized crime
offenders. The court emphasized the gravity of organized crime and the need for
 71

stringent legal measures to combat it effectively, including preventive detention

and asset forfeiture provisions.
Analysis:
 The case underscored the challenges faced by law enforcement
agencies in gathering evidence and securing convictions in cases
involving organized crime offenders, including issues related to
witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and judicial delay.
 The Rajasthan High Court's judgment highlighted the importance of
effective law enforcement measures in dismantling criminal networks
operating in the state and ensuring justice for victims.
 The judgment called for comprehensive legal frameworks and
institutional mechanisms to address witness intimidation and
harassment, signaling the need for coordinated efforts between law
enforcement agencies, judiciary, and other stakeholders to safeguard
the integrity of the criminal justice system.

4. State of Rajasthan v. Sohan Lal and Others (2015):

This case involved the prosecution of Sohan Lal and other members of an
organized crime syndicate for their involvement in drug trafficking and other
criminal activities in Rajasthan. The prosecution presented evidence linking Sohan
Lal to multiple criminal acts, including drug smuggling, money laundering, and
extortion.
The Rajasthan High Court's judgment addressed issues related to evidence
collection, witness testimony, and judicial procedure in organized crime cases. The
court emphasized the importance of ensuring fair and transparent trial proceedings
and upholding the rule of law in combatting organized crime.
 72

Analysis:
 The case highlighted the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies
in gathering evidence and securing convictions in cases involving
organized crime offenders, including issues related to witness
credibility, evidence admissibility, and judicial delay.
 The Rajasthan High Court's judgment provided legal precedents for
prosecuting organized crime offenders under state laws and
underscored the role of the judiciary in ensuring justice and
accountability in combatting organized crime.
 The judgment called for comprehensive measures to address witness
intimidation and harassment, including witness protection measures
and procedural safeguards to ensure fair and transparent trial
proceedings.

5. State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Lal (2014):

Bhanwar Lal, a notorious criminal and gang leader, was prosecuted by the state of
Rajasthan for his involvement in organized crime activities, including extortion,
land grabbing, and illegal possession of firearms. The prosecution presented
evidence linking Bhanwar Lal to multiple criminal acts, including orchestrating
violent attacks on rival gangs and law enforcement personnel.
The Rajasthan High Court's judgment in this case provided legal clarity on the
interpretation and application of state laws in prosecuting organized crime
offenders. The court emphasized the gravity of organized crime and the need for
stringent legal measures to combat it effectively, including preventive detention
and asset forfeiture provisions.
Analysis:
 73

 The case highlighted the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies

in gathering evidence and securing convictions in cases involving
organized crime offenders, including issues related to witness
protection, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation.
 The Rajasthan High Court's judgment provided legal precedents for
prosecuting organized crime offenders under state laws and
underscored the role of the judiciary in ensuring justice and
accountability in combatting organized crime.
 The judgment called for comprehensive measures to address witness
intimidation and harassment, including witness protection measures
and procedural safeguards to ensure fair and transparent trial
proceedings.
These cases offer valuable insights into the legal framework surrounding organized
crime in Rajasthan and the role of the Rajasthan High Court in adjudicating cases
related to organized crime offenses. They highlight the challenges faced by law
enforcement agencies in combatting organized crime and the judiciary's role in
ensuring fair and effective prosecution of offenders.

6.4 Law Reports:

Law reports provide a repository of judicial decisions, rulings, and opinions on

organized crime cases, offering valuable insights into legal precedents and judicial
reasoning. These reports document landmark judgments, legal arguments, and
judicial interpretations, serving as a reference for legal practitioners, scholars, and
policymakers.
 74

Case Law: Law reports such as the All India Reporter (AIR), Supreme Court Cases
(SCC), and Rajasthan Law Times (RLT) contain numerous cases related to
organized crime, including State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shantilal Shah and
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rajinder Kumar Dhawan. These cases offer
critical analysis and commentary on legal issues surrounding organized crime and
provide guidance for future legal proceedings.

6.5 Conclusion:

The judicial approach toward organized crime reflects the judiciary's commitment
to upholding the rule of law, protecting individual rights, and ensuring
accountability in combating criminal syndicates. Through landmark judgments,
legal reasoning, and judicial pronouncements, the Supreme Court, Rajasthan High
Court, and relevant law reports contribute to the development of a robust legal
framework for addressing organized crime in India.

By interpreting laws, safeguarding constitutional principles, and adjudicating cases

with fairness and impartiality, the judiciary plays a vital role in deterring organized
crime, promoting justice, and upholding the rule of law. Moving forward,
continued judicial vigilance, legal reforms, and enhanced collaboration between
the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, and policymakers are essential for
effectively combating organized crime and safeguarding the interests of society.
 75

Chapter 7 Conclusion And Suggestion

7.1 Introduction

Organized crime poses a significant threat to society, undermining the rule of law,
eroding public trust, and jeopardizing the safety and security of communities.
Throughout this study, we have explored the multifaceted nature of organized
crime in India, with a specific focus on the state of Rajasthan. We have examined
its historical development, legal frameworks, challenges in combatting it, and the
judicial approach towards addressing it. In this concluding chapter, we summarize
the findings, verify the hypotheses proposed earlier, and offer suggestions for
future action.

Conclusion
Organized crime in India, including in the state of Rajasthan, presents complex
challenges that require a comprehensive and coordinated response. The historical
context, legal frameworks, institutional capacity, and socio-economic factors
intersect to shape the landscape of organized crime, influencing its prevalence,
impact, and response.
Despite the challenges posed by political corruption, inadequate governance
structures, and transnational criminal networks, there are opportunities for
meaningful action. Strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing law enforcement
capabilities, promoting integrity within institutions, and fostering community
engagement are essential steps in combatting organized crime.
 76

Suggestions:

Based on the findings of this study, the following suggestions are offered for
addressing organized crime in India and Rajasthan:

 Strengthen Law Enforcement: Invest in capacity-building initiatives,

training programs, and technological upgrades to enhance the effectiveness
of law enforcement agencies in investigating and prosecuting organized
crime.

 Improve Governance: Address governance deficiencies, promote

transparency, accountability, and integrity in public institutions, and
strengthen regulatory frameworks to prevent corruption and collusion with
criminal syndicates.

 Enhance Legal Frameworks: Enact comprehensive legislation targeting

organized crime, including provisions for preventive detention, asset
forfeiture, witness protection, and international cooperation, to strengthen
the legal framework for combatting organized crime.

 Foster International Cooperation: Enhance cooperation and coordination

with international partners, including neighboring countries and international
organizations, to disrupt transnational organized crime networks and
exchange information and best practices.

 Empower Communities: Promote community participation, awareness, and

engagement in crime prevention initiatives, including grassroots efforts,
 77

education programs, and social interventions aimed at addressing the root

causes of organized crime.

In conclusion, combatting organized crime requires a concerted effort involving

stakeholders from government, law enforcement, civil society, and the
international community. By addressing the underlying causes, strengthening legal
frameworks, and fostering collaboration, India can mitigate the threat posed by
organized crime and uphold the rule of law for the betterment of society.

7.2. Verification of Hypotheses

Throughout our study, we have explored several hypotheses that underpin the
understanding of organized crime in India. Let us now verify these hypotheses
based on the evidence presented:
Increased socio-economic disparities and inadequate governance structures
contribute to the proliferation of organized crime in India.
Verified: The historical context and contemporary challenges demonstrate a
correlation between socio-economic disparities, governance deficiencies, and the
prevalence of organized crime.

Conclusion

Organized crime in India, including in the state of Rajasthan, presents complex

challenges that require a comprehensive and coordinated response. The historical
context, legal frameworks, institutional capacity, and socio-economic factors
intersect to shape the landscape of organized crime, influencing its prevalence,
impact, and response.
 78

Despite the challenges posed by political corruption, inadequate governance

structures, and transnational criminal networks, there are opportunities for
meaningful action. Strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing law enforcement
capabilities, promoting integrity within institutions, and fostering community
engagement are essential steps in combatting organized crime.
 79

LIST OF CASE LAWS

 Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh v/s State of Maharashtra & Others ((2007) 6

Bom. C.R. 294)

 Anil Murlidhar Deshmukh v/s State of Maharastra (2006 (1) Bom C.R.

(Cri) 371)

 In Ashok Dyanchand B. Nayak & Others v/s. State of

Maharashtra {(2004 (1)Bom C.R (Crim)700)}

 Bhurya Yakubbhan Pathan v/s. State of Maharashtra { 2005(1) Bom. C.R.

(Cri) 942}

 Charles Gurmukd Shobraj v/s Union of India {1986 (29) DLT 410}

 6. Govind Sakharan Ubhe v/s State of Maharashtra and others {2009 (3)

Bom CR (Cri) 144}

 Iqbal Hasan Shaikh Ibrahim Kaskar v/s State of Maharashtra {2003 (2)

ALD Cri(3) 2003 Bom. C.R. (Cri) }

 Jag Mohan @ Mohar Singh v/s Commissioner of Police Delhi {2007 (1)

JCC 292}
 80

 Jaisingh Asharfilal Yadav & others v. State of Maharashtra & another

{2003 Bom. C.R. (Cri) 1606}

 Jamiruddin Ansar v/s CBI (AIR 2009 SC 2781)

 Kamalesh Babulal v/s Union of India, (CDJ 2008 DHG 1090 Act para 23)

 Kamal Jeet Singh vs State (Indian Kanoonhttp://

indiankanoon.org/doc/2428071)

 Kumar v/s State of Delhi (Bail Application No 1440/2011 Indian

Kanoom_http/ Indian Canyon. Org/Cloe/1614279)

 Manohar Vichare v/s State of Maharashtra (2006(5) AIR BOM R405)

 Mohan Karnakar Chandra v/s The Inspector of Police (CBI ID, CDJ 2008

MHC 4214)

 Ram K Madhubani Vs. Union of India (CDJ 2008 DHC 1838)

 Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v/s. State of Maharashtra and Another

{2005(2) Bom. C.R. (Cri.) 567}

 Sher bahadur Akram Khan & Othres v/s State of Maharashtra {2007(1)Bom.

C.R.(Cri) 26}
 81

 Sidharth Ramesh Janmeiay V/s State of Maharashtra [2005 (1) Bom, C R

(Cri) 375]

 State of Maharashtra and Othres v/s Lalit Somdatta Nagpal and Others (2007

Cri.L.J. 1678)

 State of Maharashtra v/s Bharat Shantilal Lal Shah & Others (Criminal

appeal Nos 2008 httpp/www.india.banson. org 1 doc 698472)

 State of Maharashtra v/s Jagan Gagan Singh Nepali @ Jagya {2011 (3)

Bom.C.R. (Cri) 788}

 State of Maharashtra v Bharti Chandmal Verma @ Ayesha Khan {2002

Bom C.R. (Crim) 1; 2002 All. M.R. (Crim) 1215}

 Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh vs State of Maharashtra & ors

2010(3) Bom. C.R.(Cri 219}

 82

Bibliography

 Achen, Ch. 1982. Interpreting and using regression. Beverly Hills - London:

Sage Publications.

 Agresti, A. & Franklin, C. (2014). Statistics. The Art & Science of Learning

from Data. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

 Berry, W.D. (1993). Understanding Regression Assumptions. Newbury

Park, CA: Sage.

 Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and

evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle

River: Pearson.

 Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics with IBM SPSS Newbury Park, CA:

Sage.

 Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. et al (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis.

New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

 Levy, M., & Weitz, B., A. (2008). Retailing Management. New Delhi:

McGraw-Hill.

 Majhi P.R. & Khatua P.K.(2013)Research Methodology. Mumbai,

Maharastra: Himalaya Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.

 Pradan, S. (2003). Retailing Management, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.

 Shields, R. (1992). Lifestyle shopping: the subject of consumption. London:

 83

Routledge

 Singh, H. & Srinivasan, S. R. (2012). Mall management. New Delhi: Tata

McGrawHill

 Underhill, P. (2004), Call of the Mall, Simon & Schuster, New York.

 Zikmund et.al (2013) Business Research Methods. New Delhi: Cengage

Learning India Pvt. Ltd.

 Wakefield, K. L. & Baker, J. (1998). Excitement at the Mall: Determinants

and Effects on Shopping Response. Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 515-539.

168

 Warnaby, G. and Medway, D. (2004), "The role of place marketing as a

competitive response by town centres to out-of-town retail developments",

International Review of Retail Distribution & Consumer Research, Vol. 14

No. 4, pp. 457-77.

 Khattak, A. & Polak, J. (1993) Effect of parking information on travellers’

knowledge and behavior. Transportation. Volume 20 Issue 4. Kluwer

Academic Publishers

 Krejcie & Morgan (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities

Educational and Psychological Measurement, pp. 607-610.

 Likert, R. (1931). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of

Psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.

 84

 Ferenc Moksony (1990). Small is beautiful. The use and interpretation of R2

in socialresearch. Szociológiai Szemle, Special issue.pp. 130-138.

 Introduction to SAS. UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. from

https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/sas/modules/sas-learning-moduleintroduction-to-

thefeatures-of-sas/ (accessed Sept 14, 2017)

 Mohsen Tavakol and Reg Dennick. Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha.

International Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 2:53-55 Editorial

 http://www.statisticssolutions.com/the-linear-regression-analysis-in-spss/

 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Frlp.2010.1

---------xxx--------xxx----------