Psychedelics, Spirits and The Sacred Feminine - Communion As Cultural Critique
Psychedelics, Spirits and The Sacred Feminine - Communion As Cultural Critique
Psychedelics, Spirits and The Sacred Feminine - Communion As Cultural Critique
Any
perusal of trip reports found online (for example on erowid.org), as well as in ethnographic reports of shamanism, shows that communication with entities plays a key part in these experiences. Though the entities may take a variety of forms, the psychedelic itself is commonly personied as female; a manifestation of the Jungian Sacred Feminine. Though ethnographic materials do conrm a crosscultural association of psychedelics as female, these do not support an archetypal interpretation of the feminine. Instead, I assert that these tools draw out not only the individuals shadow but also the cultural shadow of the society and thus acts as an effective cultural critique. In my own research on cosmopolitan psychedelic culture in general and on psychedelic healing in particular, the use of these substances invokes a sense of nurturing, love, and an approach to balance a s s o c i a t e d w i t h f e m i n i n i t y. Fo r e x a m p l e, psychotherapeutic effects include alleviating emotional imbalances, doing personality work, dealing with end of life fear, inner exploration, working with interpersonal relations and spiritual development. These experiences lead to a heightened sense of well being through a sense of unconditional love and acceptance where ones experience can be assessed as it is without judgment. This is commonly associated with a connection with earth and cosmos, a focus on nature and an acknowledgement of the beauty of all things. To my research participants, these are seen to be feminine qualities. This is further reinforced by the use of the personal pronoun she when referring to psychedelic substances, in particular plant based psychedelics such as ayahuasca and Salvia divinorum, with fungi and laboratory chemicals being less feminised. Yet, in ethnographic contexts, where the psychedelic substance is also considered to be feminine the typical motifs include, but are not limited to becoming the ancestors who set up reality and culture as it now is, supernatural warfare (including healing related to witchcraft), divining criminal and/or antisocial acts, entering the spirit world to negotiate with spirits on behalf of the living
and the shamanic journey of death and rebirth (Dobkin de Rios 1993; Eliade 1964). The contrast between these two experiences of a feminine spirit begs us to evaluate what it means to be feminine, and why these divergent motifs are applied to ostensibly the same entity or phenomenon. It is Sherry Ortners (1974) assertion that in all societies women are subjugated. It is further argued that this is due to a universal attribution of male endeavour to culture and of female existence to nature. The argument is that due to the biological facts of reproduction, women are limited in their action, while men, freed of these biological constraints, can apply themselves to the elaboration of the arts, technology and religion; in short cultural activities. Though, on the surface, this argument seems to imply a certain universality to masculine and feminine roles, the truth is in no way so simple. Goody and Buckley (Goody 1969; Goody and Buckley 1973), in reviewing sexual division of labour cross-culturally, nd that, with the exception of the biological fact of reproductive roles, there is no hard and fast universal as to what men or women do. Likewise, Moore (1994) notes that the cultural uidity of womens roles, make it impossible to assert a communality based on shared membership in a universal category woman (9), leading Loftsdttir (2002) to remark that the sign woman [is] characterised by diver sity rather than singularity (306). The same, as an obvious corollary, can be said of man (Gutmann 1997). In fact, in the review of the anthropology of masculinity, Gutmann makes clear the fact that the only universal aspect of femininity and masculinity is that they create each other; they are boxes constituted by biological facts of male and female into which diverse collections of cultural material can be ung. Yet, Gilmore (1990), in an ironic echo of Ortner, argues that men in many cultures believe that women simply are born women while men need to create and re-create themselves in the model of an ideal masculine type. This is seen to be focused on the accumulation of power at each others expense and
Vol. 2. No.3
49
Vol. 2. No.3
Vol. 2. No.3
51
Vol. 2. No.3