VEIEDUQNI 03

TDoc. No

Varoc Supplier Process Audit Checklist Rey. No.

Ef. Dole
19 10 2023
01 of 03
VARROC ENGINEERING LTD. Section

Name of Supplier : Date of Audit

14:9-224,
Name of Auditor:
lobdSabbi Auditee

Product Audited: RENL- Ti-Bass

Reason For Audit : (Put Tick-mark for reason for audit In below boxes)

As per planned frequency 5 Change in processing condition and method

Poor vendor rating 6 Change In manufactrulng process from Inhouse to outsource and vice versa
In case of customer complaint,warranty Issue Change ln materlal
Plant Change or plant Expanslon Change In locatlon

Summary:
Guidelines for Rating (System Assesment)
Part A: Process Assesment As per CP Score Summary Ablity to meet requlrement In question Correctlve Acton
Rating

Total Marks enires Correctve Action in

Assigned Total Marks Obtained Percentage% The Supplier quality system is absent
5wZHEWZH8D format

Need major Improvement Comectve

Requirement is met but there are majpr inconsistencies in implementation or ckon racommanded&he same
1 need to be submtted in
documentation
sw2HEw2H/8D format
Need Minor Improvement Correctve
Requirement is met but there t inor inconsistencies in implementaion or
imolermectalioecbon recommended but no need to
2 documentation, or is in the early phases and onv reiminary evdence of Gubmit
effectiveness eists.

Part B: System Assesment Score Summary 3 Requirement is met, effectively implemented, and fuly documentad. No acbon required

Points Total Score TotalScore

Obtained Score NA Requirement is not applicable. No action required
other than N/A
A 48
B
u2
96
93
27
Total Audit Score
D 12 % Weightage Actual Percentage%
Obtained () (Based on Weightage) (x
6 System
F 15 9. S
Assesment
Process
Assesment
40%

60%
333
G Total %Score (v+w)
18

12
3
(2
J 9
Total 252

Percentage% 21.

Suppller Representative Signature Varroc Representative Signature

Rev History:
Sr No. Rev No Change Details Date Prepared By Approved By

Vilas Todkar Anuradha

1 Checksheet revised for addition of EHS,OHSMS points based on NC observed in audit 19,10.2023
Shinde, Chandrakant Houde Rahul K Mishra

1. Checksheet reviewed for adequacy, and corrected.

Three Pas n Sandip Dhanawade, Shivkumar Sharma,

2 21.05.2020 Ashish Bawkar, Satheesh Enugurthy GKRamesh
2) Part A-Verification of Process as per Control Plan
3) Part B - System assessment wrt Process to be audited
4)Past troble data verification point added

3
1. Approved by names added 11.02.2019 Radhika Kulkarni
2. Audit score summary table updated yoti Bagal

1. Point L.3 regarding initl lot identilicaion was deleted

2. Point l.2 was modfied
23.01.2019 Radhika Kulkarni
. Spider web added for markdng eudit score es per customer requirement (Applicble only for Jyoti Bagal

1.4M Change Manegement secion sdded (l section)

2. Folowing new checkpoints were added in existing sections: F2, 8.23, B.25, B.14
3. Folowing checkpoints were modiied: A6, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.11, B.12, 8.13, B.13, B.21, B.22, 12.12.2018 Radhika Kulkarni
Jyoi Bagal
4. Point G3 in prevous checksheet was deleted as it was repeated

Supplier process audit dhecklst preprod 21.03.2018 Jyoti Bagat Rajeshwari Dhore

Page 2 of 1
 VOrrOC
rCELLENCE

A A4 AR A.2 A.1 A.
Sr.No
8.1h B.1g B.1f B.le B.1d B.1c B.1b B.la A.15 A.14 A.13 A.12 A.11 A. A.E A.6 A.S A
B 10

is is Critical Do lControl
Plan? |Are Process
Control
Is Whether
FIFO is Is Whether Is |Is sheets
incoming Are |Are Whether Whether Whether
Whether available Whether
supplierhasControl
i Whether Inward/Store
environment)cavity of|Do Are Is
Plan? incoming |deterloration,damage, T/lot Is Whether standard traceability ?|Athree
variation? thereaction approved the the the storage materlal supplier materlal
the the no the the
moldstfhoer sample operator frequency Control etc. and Inward
approved parameter inspection the andmode Inward the Sampling Inward varroc the
shipping?
materialto location tested MTC records
(Examples:instructions AOI ? testing drawing
size, Plan system related ofinspection inspection approved
is instructions of maintained ? 0s packing Quality related
frequency
same
part, Control avallable applied is Is in
frequency are
inspection plan
is method inspection
defined for being place
defined documents with
multiple are mix maintained? supplier is standard
storage plan ENGINEERING
VARROC
LTD.
incorporated Plan, at up's checked with & report report available? 9001/IATF16949
latestcertificationISO d,
and with and dispatch
changesand & reflect each & decided is is Points
Audit
machines IPO,m equipment being adhered tracebility available ?
sampling supplier controlled
etc of done relevant for for list with revision
the operation incoming
is as
performed in mentioned all all available
dispahyed & as approved revision
latestare
or requirements ? place being materialrarawe BOP
time,
oerkemethod in & per as available
frtures control ? being information PART
same materlal latest in are ?
and i followed
ut as PPAP? by maintained
talke is used described being in Supplier ?
for plan the followed drawing receiving
same into of as to like
B
wear
tool stage? followed, ?
the described avold with -
acoount
charncteristic, heat and maintained System
with Control in ? inspection
check with
the code are
and the from traceability
PDI? packaging Supplier
Plan? in Control
souroes the /coil
olt no
assessment
Process
Page
1of 7
o
1
Ratings
M 2 2 2 w.r.t Audit
2 3 |2 3 Checklist
3NA Process
3 3 3
Doco
Section Date
Eff. Rev.No. Doc.N0.
mateilDoc-Mo
Lot Doc-oTuPto4 Letos:Doco
oIFrtihate-No
TATE Ce beto
Doc-No-A1)- Euidole audited
Cent)oon
donEui o oEuidet
EwideoC
koing SPILatt Observations/
Evidence
enl
SoP
planhe
díslet
VEEBU/QA/F63
y 202310
3
19
alowloe OF
3 05

ist
 audited
assessment w.r.t Process to be
PART B:- System
Ratings

Sr.No
Audit Points o 1 |2 3 NA
observations Ehdenes
in place and being
followed?
pertinent process control documents
Are other
instructions, standard operating 2
B.3 (Examples: process sheets, inspection & test
instructions)
procedures, preventive maintenance

stored appropriately with proper

sign-off
Irsecin
B4
Is inspection data retained and
from quality in-charge? Sioe ih
to protect the parts (both
in-process
Paccir Stardol tallo
Are instructions included for packaging
B.5 & are they followed?
&final) from damage & contamination,
 Sr.No
B.8 B.7 B.6
VC3 B.13 B.12 B.11 B.10 B.9
B.18 B.17 B.16 B.15 B.14
C.5 C.4 8.25 B.24 B.23 B.22 B.21 B.20 B.19
C.2 C.1

Is Is Is personnel Are
Is process
initiated Are explained
whatever Does issues
Whetheraddressed?complaints
were Are
Are Is the Does machine
proper
Have of |Is Is Are Are Aremaintained ?|Are Are & s customer operator operator operator operators
Is operation, changed?
he/she Does Inspection,Measuring records their Control
their calibration there deviation Machine
the PM the
all quality the the the poka-yoke poka-yoke the ? characteristics
the the supplier breakdown plan system For properly
master them
using an partsmaster/limit master with dailyinspector/operator are setting maintaining aware having
operator breakdown he/she
by eg. Plan/IPO/FMEAcomplaint
gages and
understanding breakdown is properly
note records available /monthly th e
plan has preventive are verified identified proper maintained?being If
list are /limit concerned has red piece about knowledge trained
from and being
ofcalibrated available
understand
properly? the layout
of
inspection and sample action filled followed bin awareness (especially trained
customer the are & sample defect /rejected the JH
needed & actions history packed on system
inspection
same? are adhered & record activity? for
of Testing the daily added adequately? etc.
and & which
plan? person filling about performing to Points Audit
adhered they respective validated displayed matrix for
the tools/gages been is as basis is been for perform
Instruments records equipments available in to first parts to of
proper effective? per in filling the in the quality
tools/gages plan place ? updated JH special
taken approved & control or piece place/setting kept
? on at records rejected For in operator activity
retained? for corrective along th e process work their PART
use if frequency each requirementsprocesses)?
at parameters approved by plan/WI/IPO eg. approval seperately
of the the records? adequately ? operations?
involving
are with packing stage of Can &
the work parts inspection piece
needed supplier actions the rejections inspectors? B-
tools/ges proper based ? and
station? products same recorded to
are standard? ? parts of key
last avoid after System
for NG to effective?
analysis ? records the product Are
being also piece are
each prevent customer products?
or & & mix appropriate
and have maintain actions be identifled?
of explain approval up and
is cause
been assessment

210
Page
Ratings
3 w.r.t
of 2
7
NA
3
3 Process
3 3 |3
Polco to
Lesu DoNo be
redspay
Sarple eja
iele audited
Irst.No-OAoZA
display lce oleror
Sample Irspechsn Searafly
piaple Setir
|uien
ARlicableNa Observations/
lan
eurda
ienlan
us be Evidence

Actud
abeneloda in
Euidad
 C.9 C.8
Sr.No
C.7 C.6

gauges,wearidentification
codes? Are
Is Is Is
calibration their their
all
the master master
inspection
pattern
frequency
list list
of of
being instruments, jigs machine
being &
checked fixtures?
followed gauges Points
Audit
machine
? ?
&
reviewed
gauges,jigs PART
based
& B
on fixtures :-
type System
of have

assessment

0
1
Ratings
2 w.r.t
2
3
Process
NA

to
Noedobo Meel be
audited

to
Observations/
Evidence
e
roiriei)
whof
Clbr
 D D.1
Sr.No
E2 E.1 D.4 D.3 D
F.2 F.1 E 2
GE G2 G.1 FS F4 F.3
H4 H.3 H.2 H.1 H
H.

Are Statistical
Control
Quality Are sheets? validatedArthe customerandare Are Are Special
corrective are Does Non Does for Is Does ensure In Dies/Tooling Does For
Is Does Change4M improvement?
definedManagement
Is procedure? shown Does in-process |Does conformity ?|Are 5W2H,
6W2H )? Is Does
Corrective Doeseffectiveness?
for Does case the the
Is appropriate supplier critical control the
awareness 4M lesson supplier red customer supplier
corrective supplier Supplier Supplier Conformance
Supplier supplier supplier records special special Process
change the supplier corective that of
bins automatic
supplier learnt/ action inform operations charts
issue investigates & the
action Preventive
& monitors has Control process processes(Powder
about record track has have analyze rework have have owned defined of
relatedactions actions an for the parameter sign-off
have Past a thereof the
to dedicated priorities system Control tool machines, adequate
4M in supplier property
customer : iscritical process validatedthe at
trouble improve decided the bins the tool
(forPpk/Cpk identifiedCoating,
changes place a actions is the Actions duplication records
change monitored nonconformity & tool
root whether available of & condition change parameters added Points
Audit
with quality Feduction identification Review ? being
data the register about are systemProcesses)
iven and to cause
dominant value for Annealing,Heat
in
mnanagement eliminate interlocks In
detalls base samerating customer at plan frequency monitored? control the control
for correction the of to time
to of for plan all being same
operators summary ? effectiveness on bushes/insert monitor available PARTB-
of received
Has customer customer to stages? mould/ of
the correct for identify of the plan/Wi/PO/in-process plan
nonconforming available calculated? available? new
system the issue nonconformity? is basis is
changes? implermented die being tool ? Treatment,Plating, ?
and avilable? supplier from complaint complaint Are product
related reason the of
in ? life pins followed? in life?
other (applicable root tool they
place customer on the System
quality actions) of life?
etc? development
cause monthly machine being
personnelr with non (use ? products
&
rating & , monitored used
a for of &
well take CAPA basis to Welding,
both and i assessment
:
Soldering
3NA
12 0
Page
,Printing)Ratings
5 w.r.t
of 2
7 2 2 |2 2.
3 Process

No-FDO Do to
Nees araoc Hke A Nee be
raratem
Charte eed audited
Ap?lrcablNot d
to FI
eutontoolt
be Observations/Evidence
ooes
arel be
lollQ
Co
vert
egulasl
rort
 14
Sr.No

relevantHasall
made? Work
Instructions,

documentation
(Control
FMEA,

PPAP

etc.) Points
Audit
been
Plan,
updated
In
System
PARTB-
process
after
inspections
the
change

sheets,
was
assessment
w.r.t

0
1
Ratings
2
3
Process
NA

to
be
audited

Observations/
Evldence
 we
oHazardo
emedicd
Haeardy
Evidence
Observations/
losel
Lur
oC
audited
be
to
Process
NA
w.r.t 3
Ratings
2
assessment
1
o
PART
System
B:- process. June calender
plant.
act. th the
to
Haz at
factory sent 30 at
monitored by of
to Sept provided
is latest drills.
per exposed waste
30th status.
norms. mock
as return arrangement/extinguishers
and the by
processes
emplyees actual
Audit
PointsOHSMS measured andcontrol latest
Waste
evacuation
Managment
waste and NA)
V B)
hazardous
for pollution
Haz form (Except(Part
Mockdrill
level
performed hazardous Emergency
annual in
return Percentage
Obtained
lux the NOC?
the the of Total
& per
level
perfoms
Safety,environment
and generates annual frequency
perfoem
Firefighting
medicals submitted
as year. Marks in
noise waste have
filed
calender Rating
vendor fire confirm
yearly
periodical supplier suppliersupplier Total
haz suppliersupplier adequate
workplace. authorised
thehalf current
the the the i))Please
()Do
()ls(ii)ls Has Has
DDo year. C.Doi)Are
Do
ii) in ii) i)
Sr.No
J.1 J.2 J.3
 Process
NOTE:- PART
20-CNC mbe
A÷Verification
Parts
Turnirgt1 Process
Narne
to
be
checked
&
ecording
as
per
process of
process
Characteristic
Productjudgement
and
product
&
recording
parameters

to
be as
done per
for
control
QutyDìarele
Outer Characteristcs
Process minimum
uth plan
(Process
1no.
Diaceed Part
Assesment)

ENGINEERING
VARROC
LTD.
Specification

263to as
Supplier
per
Control
Process
Plan

Audit
(10
(1
marklorMarks Checklist
marks Assigned
Process)
for
Critical

Observation
Actual

23

Concluslon
(OKNGINI)

Obtained
Marks

cause,
RootNG

n
Pan
caseAction Section DateE. Rev.No. Doc.No

of
NGINI

Responsibility

VEEBUIOAFS3
19.10.2023
2
OF3