5 Essay Questions in IRAC Format (BOTH SIDES) - LOOK AT PROBLEMS IN BOOK
5 Essay Questions in IRAC Format (BOTH SIDES) - LOOK AT PROBLEMS IN BOOK
5 Essay Questions in IRAC Format (BOTH SIDES) - LOOK AT PROBLEMS IN BOOK
Professor: Christine Curran E-Mail: [email protected] Cell: (773) 671-1604 D is arrested. It may be with a warrant, or it may be without a warrant (which is most common). It may be a misdemeanor, and it may be a felony. If you are sentenced to a penitentiary for a misdemeanor, the maximum sentence is 364 days, and the sentence for a felony is a year or more. Misdemeanors in order of Most serious: A, B, C, D. Felonies in order of LEAST serious: 4, 3, 2, 1, x, Super x.
Malum per se crimes or actions are actions that are wrong in and of themselves. There is no way that a crime that is malum in se can possibly be viewed as being a good thing or a positive action. They are always wrong. Crimes in the categories were the original felony offenses. Offenses in this category include murder in all of its forms, robbery, arson, and a couple of other crimes. It is somewhat impossible to think that murdering a person could be a good thing or not wrong and so murder is bad in and of itself and so is malum in se. Malum prohibitum crimes are far more common than malum in se ones. These crimes are wrong because they have been prohibited by a legislature or other law-making authority. These crimes vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and can be defined in a wide variety of areas. This type of prohibited action can be either a felony or a misdemeanor depending on the whims of the legislature or other body. Doctrine of Desuetude: that causes statutes, similar legislation or legal principles to lapse and become unenforceable by a long habit of non-enforcement or lapse of time. It is what happens to laws that are not repealed when they become obsolete. It is the legal doctrine that long and continued non-use of a law renders it invalid, at least in the sense that courts will no longer tolerate punishing its transgressors. Felonies Police make the arrest, and D is informally charged at that point, with whatever class of felony the state's attorneys office feels is appropriate. If it's a drug case, it goes off the weight of the drugs at the station house. The packaging of the drugs makes it much heavier that the drugs really are. The package is part of the weight when it is integral to the packaging of the drugs. o Total estimated weight of drugs has a huge impact on bail amounts. o Factors that affect arrest Nature of the offense Offender behavior Known criminal history Victim- harm to Bias of the cop o ASA- Felony Review called and their factors on whether or not to charge Victim/ damage Evidence Criminal history Willingness and presence SEXY CRIMES- ones that society likes to prosecute. Within a reasonable time after arrest, "without unnecessary delay", you get your Gerstein Hearing/Statement. It's informal and the whole issue is: Is there enough evidence to continue to detain the person. It is not adversarial (although D has a right to an attorney). The state's attorney reads briefly from the arrest report here. Your initial bond will be set here, and you can do a motion to increase/decrease bond, with proper notice. o This is a nonadversarial hearing. Just need evidence to show that a crime was committed and the individual probably did it. o In a felony, fingerprints must clear through computer system before you're put on a bus and taken to Court b/c the rap sheet needs to be known. The preliminary hearing will be set at the Gerstein hearing. o In felony cases, indictment is common to happen before this. Two ways to Formally charge an individual:
Page 1 of 32
Page 2 of 32
Page 3 of 32
BAIL & Bond NO BAIL IN CAPITAL CASES You are usually working for bond money after all the costs are taken out. Clerk takes 10% of the bond, no matter what. Bond is a condition of if he's going to show up in court. D is taken in front of a judge after the arrest, for his preliminary hearing - the Gerstein hearing. o Need probable cause to detain/continue to detain. o It is non-adversarial. o If they are going to detain you, what do the constitutions say about it? Article 1, Section 9. Except in a certain class of cases, the D is entitled to bail. Bail bondsmen are done away with in Illinois. When a D is held in custody before he's convicted, he's in custody of the county jail where he's been charged. Bail is money posted to the clerk to get out of jail temporarily. It's making bond. Never tell a judge a lie about where the D is. Verify it yourself. o B/c a judge may want it verified, and it will hurt your reputation. o If what your client is doing is illegal, don't let him tell you. Most popular bond - "D" bond - Deposit Bond. o Deposit is 10% of the T bond. o If they don't show up in court, and judgment is entered against D. The other 90% is due then! The judgment will be for the entire amount! If D is in jail, how can he put up bond money? o All the county jails have ATMs. o The individual puts in their name and address. Money will be released to them if they pay for it. o What's really dumb, is if you sign as "guarantor." That puts you on the hook for the D if he jumps bail. The 10% clerk keeps - true of Cash and Deposit Bonds o Clerks always keep 10%, before ANY fees are deducted. o So, the most a bond is EVER worth, is 90% of it's face value. You get the rest of the bond money back if you show up to court, no matter what. IL Constitution, Article 1 9. BAIL AND HABEAS CORPUS: everyone gets opportunity for bail, EXCEPT: Bail in habeas corpus Once you're already in jail, you have right to file petition for writ of habeas corpus. Latin for "Bring up the body" You have a right to get out of jail and in front of a judge to determine the correctness of your incarceration. This right is never suspended.
Page 4 of 32
Page 5 of 32
Page 6 of 32
5 essay questions in IRAC format (BOTH SIDES)------------LOOK AT PROBLEMS IN BOOK - 725 ILCS 5/110-2 = I-bond, used when people are likely to appear in court when required and no danger to any
person. Monetary bail should be set only when it is determined that no other conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance in court, that the defendant does not present a danger to any person or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond. If does not show up = warrant - 725 ILCS 5/110-3 = warrant issue. Preponderance of the evidence that his failure to appear is not intentional. o If it's felony charge, judge must issue a warrant if the guy skips out on his court date. o If D comes back, he has to show by a preponderance of evidence, that his missing of his court date was not intentional. Better to just be polite and say nothing much more. - 725 ILCS 5/110-4 = Bailable offenses. All persons shall be bailable unless it is capitol, sentences where there is life without possibility of parole, or when after a hearing the defendant poses a threat. Death penalty is nonbail. o Presumption must be great o A person seeking release on bail who is charged with a capital offense or an offense for which a sentence of life imprisonment may be imposed shall not be bailable until a hearing is held.= required hearing o burden of demonstrating that the proof of his guilt is not evident and the presumption is not great= UNCONSTITUTIONAL - 725 ILCS 5/110-5 = What are factors determining the amount of bail? MITIGATION AND AGRIGATION Was there violence/threat of violence? Organized gang membership suggested? Weapons? Judge will take into account: What will reasonable assure presence of D in court, and Assure safety of people in community, Taking into account nature of crime, Residence of Defendant. B/c of flight, bond slips for pay is not always good. - 725 ILCS 5/110-6 = Bail can be adjusted with increased or decreased. Or can revoke. Need notice. - 725 ILCS 5/110-6.1 = Class X and Super X nonprobational offenses. Need HEARING upon state petition that bail should be denied. State must allege defendant is danger to people. Dont need notice. - 725 ILCS 5/110-8 = Case, stocks bonds and real estate as surety for bail. Need to show that you are the owner of it. Market value for the bond or stocks as their value. If they dont comply with the bail bond then it can be REVOKED. - 725 ILCS 5/110-10 = Condition of bail bonds. Need to be in court when they have court dates. Cannot pick up cases. No firearms, need psych evaluation if told to. Or any other conditions that the court tells them (special conditions of bond) - 725 ILCS 5/110-16 = bond forfeiture when non appearance (JBFW/ BFW) 3 ways to charge 1. 2. 3. Complaint- misdemeanor Information- prelim Indictment- GJ
725 ILCS 5/111-3 Form of charge. (a) A charge shall be in writing and allege the commission of an offense by: (1) Stating the name of the offense; (2) Citing the statutory provision alleged to have been violated; (3) Setting forth the nature and elements of the offense charged; (4) Stating the date and county of the offense as definitely as can be done; and
Page 7 of 32
Page 8 of 32
Page 9 of 32
Page 10 of 32
RANDOM QUESTIONS (MOSTLY ON GRAND JURY) Use Immunity- prevents the prosecution only from using the witness's own testimony or any evidence derived from the testimony against the witness Transactional Immunity- blanket, completely protects the witness from future prosecution for crimes related to his or her testimony - People have the 5th amendment right in GJ - When someone asserts 5th amendment claim, you can offer them immunity or stop questioning them. - Tax payer want to quash a subpoena duces tecum, cannot challenge it. - Subpoena for the Grand Jury, you have to show up - **If person is in custody, the term is 30 days for a preliminary hearing.** - **If person is out of custody, the term is 60 days for a preliminary hearing.** - A person can never assert 5th amendment in GJ against documents because they are not testimonial in nature. - Challenge to reasonableness of GJ subpoena cannot reveal purpose of why they are there. IT IS SECRET - Dont have to produce exculpatory evidence during GJ - GJ DOESNT need to mirandize the person before taking their testimony - The constitution does not mandate that the GJ inform the witness that they are a suspect. - Person who refuses to co-operate with GJ can be held only until the end of the GJ term or her can purge himself. - The documents that the GJ subpoenas are irrelevant. - Name 2 of the 3 rules of evidence that apply to the testimonial privileges 1. Hearsay is admissible 2. Attorney client 3. Doctor patient 4. Confessor penitent - Ways that the clock of Preliminary hearing 1. Waiver 2. BCX- psych exam 3. GJ indictment
Page 11 of 32
o o
o o
o o
Page 12 of 32
725 ILCS 5/114-1 Motion to dismiss charge. (a) Upon the written motion of the defendant made prior to trial before or after a plea has been entered the court may dismiss the indictment, information or complaint upon any of the following grounds: (1) The defendant has not been placed on trial in compliance with Section 103-5 of this Code. (2) The prosecution of the offense is barred by Sections 3-3 through 3-8 of the Criminal Code of 1961, as heretofore and hereafter amended. (3) The defendant has received immunity from prosecution for the offense charged. (4) The indictment was returned by a Grand Jury which was improperly selected and which results in substantial injustice to the defendant. (5) The indictment was returned by a Grand Jury which acted contrary to Article 112 of this Code and which results in substantial injustice to the defendant. (6) The court in which the charge has been filed does not have jurisdiction. (7) The county is an improper place of trial. (8) The charge does not state an offense. (9) The indictment is based solely upon the
Page 13 of 32
Page 14 of 32
5 essay questions in IRAC format (BOTH SIDES)------------LOOK AT PROBLEMS IN BOOK o 5/114-6: person is subject jurisdiction to action where the offense is committed within the state.
You can waive person jurisdiction 720 ILCS 5/1-6 Place of trial. (a) Generally. Criminal actions shall be tried in the county where the offense was committed, except as otherwise provided by law. The State is not required to prove during trial that the alleged offense occurred in any particular county in this State. When a defendant contests the place of trial under this Section, all proceedings regarding this issue shall be conducted under Section 114-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. All objections of improper place of trial are waived by a defendant unless made before trial. (b) Assailant and Victim in Different Counties. If a person committing an offense upon the person of another is located in one county and his victim is located in another county at the time of the commission of the offense, trial may be had in either of said counties. (c) Death and Cause of Death in Different Places or Undetermined. If cause of death is inflicted in one county and death ensues in another county, the offender may be tried in either county. If neither the county in which the cause of death was inflicted nor the county in which death ensued are known before trial, the offender may be tried in the county where the body was found. (d) Offense Commenced Outside the State. If the commission of an offense commenced outside the State is consummated within this State, the offender shall be tried in the county where the offense is consummated. (e) Offenses Committed in Bordering Navigable Waters. If an offense is committed on any of the navigable waters bordering on this State, the offender may be tried in any county adjacent to such navigable water. (f) Offenses Committed while in Transit. If an offense is committed upon any railroad car, vehicle, watercraft or aircraft passing within this State, and it cannot readily be determined in which county the offense was committed, the offender may be tried in any county through which such railroad car, vehicle, watercraft or aircraft has passed. (g) Theft. A person who commits theft of property may be tried in any county in which he exerted control over such property. (h) Bigamy. A person who commits the offense of bigamy may be tried in any county where the bigamous marriage or bigamous cohabitation has occurred. (i) Kidnaping. A person who commits the offense of kidnaping may be tried in any county in which his victim has traveled or has been confined during the course of the offense. 720 ILCS 5/1-5 State criminal jurisdiction. (a) A person is subject to prosecution in this State for an offense which he commits, while either within or outside the State, by his own conduct or that of another for which he is legally accountable, if: (1) the offense is committed either wholly or partly within the State; or (2) the conduct outside the State constitutes an attempt to commit an offense within the State; or (3) the conduct outside the State constitutes a conspiracy to commit an offense within the State, and an act in furtherance of the conspiracy occurs in the State; or (4) the conduct within the State constitutes an attempt, solicitation or conspiracy to commit in another jurisdiction an offense under the laws of both this State and such other jurisdiction. (b) An offense is committed partly within this State, if either the conduct which is an element of the offense, or the result which is such an element, occurs within the State. In a prosecution pursuant to paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of Section 9-1, the attempt or commission of a forcible felony other than second degree murder within this State is conduct which is an element of the offense for which a person is subject to prosecution in this State. In homicide, the "result" is either the physical contact which causes death, or the death itself; and if the body of a homicide victim is found within the State, the death is presumed to have occurred within the State. (c) An offense which is based on an omission to perform a duty imposed by the law of this State is committed within the State, regardless of the location of the offender at the time of the omission.
Page 15 of 32
Curative instruction to a jury: dont think that the person is more likely to be guilty if they are charged with a crime with someone else that is a worse person = HORRIBLE IDEA!!! NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!--always argue this pro and con The possibility of multiple juries in the same courtroom Prosecution will argue Judicial economy- trying same people, repetition of evidence, witness inconvenience and of course money **Just because you have conflicting defenses does not mean you get severance ***** What is not enough for joinder o FRCP Rule 14 does not require severance as a matter of law when codefendants present "mutually exclusive defenses." While the Rule recognizes that joinder, even when proper under Rule 8(b), may prejudice either a defendant or the Government, it does not make mutually exclusive defenses prejudicial per se or require severance whenever prejudice is shown. Rather, severance should be granted only if there is a serious risk that a joint trial would compromise a specific trial right of a properly joined defendant or prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence. The risk of prejudice will vary with the facts in each case, and the Rule leaves determination of the risk, and the tailoring of any necessary remedy, to the
Page 16 of 32
Page 17 of 32
Pros of joinder: o Judicial efficiency o Witness/evidence efficiency Cons of joinder: o Confusion of evidence btw Ds o Prejudicial spill-over of evidence (jdg can give curative jury instructions) o Remedies- can give each D a jury or have one bench & one jury Test for granting severance: o If evidence would be admissible against each D in separate trials, it is admissible in a joint trial, severance denied o If evidence would not be admissible at separate trials, it will not be admissible in a joint trial, severance granted Evidence of prior bad acts is admissible against a crim D to prove: o Motive o Intent o Knowledge o Identity o Preparation/plan o Absence of mistake/accident o Common plan/scheme Hypo: D is charged w/ 3 bank robberies
Page 18 of 32
Bruton Doctrine: (ON FINAL) Hypo: D Talker & D Silent have a joint murder trial D T says " D S & I killed the victim" during post-arrest interrogation D T's statement is admissible as a statement against interest (No other way stmt would get in- no other exception applies) D T will not testify at trial (constitutional right not to) D S has a 6th amd right to confront (cross-x) D T as a witness against him Bruton Rule: D's get separate trial when: 1 or more. Multiple Ds State wants joint trial D1 makes a stmt that inculpates a co-D That stmt is not admissible under any other exception to the hearsay rule Declarant (D1) will not testify at the joint trial (has const right not to) NO OTHER EXCEPTION TO HEARSAY EXCEPT DECLARATION AGAINST INTEREST Remedies o 2 juries o Severance o Curative instructions Hypo: o D talker & D Blabber mouth both confess but DB says DT did it much worse o Both stmts are getting in since both inculpatory Exceptions to Bruton:- ie joinder will be granted Co-conspirator stmts: are admissible against all Ds (common plan/scheme evidence exception) = joint trial (bc would be admissible in separate trials) But there must be independent evidence of conspiracy (not just stmt) for the stmt to be admissible against the non-speaker If DS has opp to cross-ex DT at pretrial hearing but doesnt, severance will be denied (California v Green)- doesnt apply to pretrial evidence suppression hearings
Page 19 of 32
Question on Final: Bruton Case (1968) o SUMMARY: Petitioner was tried with Mr. Evans (co-defendant) for armed postal robbery; both were convicted by a jury. At trial, the court allowed testimony of a witness, who indicated that co-defendant confessed to the crime and to having the help of Petitioner in committing the crime, to be admitted against co-defendant, but instructed the jury not to consider it in determining Petitioners guilt. On appeal, the Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Petitioners conviction, and Petitioner challenges, on certiorari, his conviction here. o Two Defendants, T&S o T made a statement out of court: S & I did it. o It was an inculpatory statement. o It was hearsay. o T won't take the stand. o It's not being used to impeach, it's being used for truth of the matter asserted. o If T was the sole Defendant, it would be admitted as a statement against a party's interest. o But, no other exception applies here. The defendants would need to be severed for it to come in. o What if, both defendants talked? In other words, interlocking inculpatory statements. Parker v. Randolph US Supreme Court says: they're screwing themselves, and each other. So, it gets in. o RULE: When a co-defendants confession implicates a criminal defendant, and the co-defendant does not testify at trial, the admission of the confession violates the criminal defendants rights under the 6th amendment Confrontation Clause, even when jury instructions are given that instruct the jury to disregard the co-defendants confession in deciding the criminal defendants guilt. Exception to Bruton: Co-conspirator's statements -those get in. And, both defendants don't even need to be charged with conspiracy. o Statements made by co-conspirators is admissible against both defendants. Not necessarily confessions either. o However, the statement cannot be the only evidence of the conspiracy. Must be other evidence of a conspiracy before that evidence is even considered. Hypo: A &B charged together for armed robbery. o A says "Hey B, kill that guy." That statement alone is not enough to use it against B. Must be other independent evidence. Must show something that they concerted together. o This is where Joinder is going to happen. This is an exception to Bruton. California v. Green - Exception #2 to Bruton. o Assume there has been the opportunity to confront the speaking co-defendant witness. o But, let's say they put him on as a witness at a preliminary hearing (bad idea because discovery hasn't been done yet). o The other co-defendant then has the ability to cross examine the defendant-talker on that inculpatory statement. o If you have the chance to cross examine the speaker at the preliminary hearing, you have to do it. It will get in. Hypo: Pre-Trial Motion to Suppress o Imagine Defendant-T is going to testify about his right to unreasonable searches was violated. So, it's based on 4th Amendment. He testifies to this.
Page 20 of 32
Pre-Trial Redaction o Imagine statement is "S and I did it." And the judge says "ok, let's white it out, and have it say '__ and I did it'." o However, this really does not have much of an impact and is prejudicial. o However, the US Supreme Court has said you should still get your severance b/c it is prejudicial.
FEDERAL SPEEDY TRIAL The Federal Statute recognizes that everybody has an interest in a speedy trial. How long is speedy trial? o If D is NOT on bond, state has 120 days from date of arrest to try it. o If D is ON bond, 160 days from date of arrest o Write a written demand for a speedy trial. If you think you're going to have a speedy trial issue in this case, you re-file it. General Rule: Speedy Trial in Federal Statutes codifies US Supreme Court Rule: Barker v. Wingo o Criteria under which how fast a D has to be put to trial by the prosecution. Federal Prosecutors must file an indictment/information for an arrest within 30 days. The trial gets 70 days. This makes a total of 100 days. Illinois Speedy Trial: Basis- 6th and Barker v. Wingo: There is a societal interest to providing a speedy trial that is considered separate and apart from the interest of the accused. Not just what D and P want, but what society at large wants. It costs the taxpayer a lot of money. **TRIGGER DATE = Arrest date Crucial factor is: is the D in custody or out of custody. o 120 days if he's in jail o 160 days if he's on bond. o The delays are all the same as in federal cases. o If the delay is occasioned by the D, the clock stops. o If the delay is occasioned by the P, the clock does not stop. Must make written demand for speedy trial- DOESNT MATER WHETHER IN OR OUT OF CUSTODY If it is Stricken for Leave to reinstate and renew the prosecution w/in 30 days; or a Nolle Prosque (choosing not to prosecute), then the clock DOES stop, even though P brings both of those. o These are both granted as a matter of course, and it stops the speedy trial stop. Then, they can be reraised anytime within the statute of limitations. Why important- presumption of innocence (damage to accused's rep), effect on D's ability to present a good defense, effect on State's ability to prepare prosecution (witnesses die, forget) Delays: o When occasioned by D (motions, demands, discovery requests, etc), clock stops Ex- if D is in custody for 4 days after arrest & then mom posts bond, now D is on the 160 day clock & his speedy trial must be w/in 156 days Ex- if D files motion to suppress on day 159 & it is not heard till day 170, the interim days do not count as speedy trial days, now must file a new request for speedy trial o When D is not a usual & public resident of the state - clock stops How long between when an act was committed, and when a prosecutor can bring the charges. Felonies: 3 years.
Page 21 of 32
725 ILCS 5/103-5 Speedy trial. (a) Every person in custody in this State for an alleged offense shall be tried by the court having jurisdiction within 120 days from the date he was taken into custody unless delay is occasioned by the defendant, by an examination for fitness ordered pursuant to Section 104-13 of this Act, by a fitness hearing, by an adjudication of unfitness to stand trial, by a continuance allowed pursuant to Section 114-4 of this Act after a court's determination of the defendant's physical incapacity for trial, or by an interlocutory appeal. Delay shall be considered to be agreed to by the defendant unless he or she objects to the delay by making a written demand for trial or an oral demand for trial on the record. The provisions of this subsection (a) do not apply to a person on bail or recognizance for an offense but who is in custody for a violation of his or her parole or mandatory supervised release for another offense. The 120-day term must be one continuous period of incarceration. In computing the 120-day term, separate periods of incarceration may not be combined. If a defendant is taken into custody a second (or subsequent) time for the same offense, the term will begin again at day zero. (b) Every person on bail or recognizance shall be tried by the court having jurisdiction within 160 days from the date defendant demands trial unless delay is occasioned by the defendant, by an examination for fitness ordered pursuant to Section 104-13 of this Act, by a fitness hearing, by an adjudication of unfitness to stand trial, by a continuance allowed pursuant to Section 114-4 of this Act after a court's determination of the defendant's physical incapacity for trial, or by an interlocutory appeal. The defendant's failure to appear for any court date set by the court operates to waive the defendant's demand for trial made under this subsection. For purposes of computing the 160 day period under this subsection (b), every person who was in custody for an alleged offense and demanded trial and is subsequently released on bail or recognizance and demands trial, shall be given credit for time spent in custody following the making of the demand while in custody. Any demand for trial made under this subsection (b) shall be in writing; and in the case of a defendant not in custody, the demand for trial shall include the date of any prior demand made under this provision while the defendant was in custody. (c) If the court determines that the State has exercised without success due diligence to obtain evidence material to the case and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence may be obtained at a later day the court may continue the cause on application of the State for not more than an additional 60 days. If the court determines that the State has exercised without success due diligence to obtain results of DNA testing that is material to the case and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that such results may be obtained at a later day, the court may continue the cause on application of the State for not more than an additional 120 days. (d) Every person not tried in accordance with subsections (a), (b) and (c) of this Section shall be discharged from custody or released from the obligations of his bail or recognizance. (e) If a person is simultaneously in custody upon more than one charge pending against him in the same county, or simultaneously demands trial upon more than one charge pending against him in the same county, he shall be tried, or adjudged guilty after waiver of trial, upon at least one such charge before expiration relative to any of such pending charges of the period prescribed by subsections (a) and (b) of this Section. Such person shall be tried upon all of the remaining charges thus pending within 160 days from the date on which judgment relative to the first charge thus prosecuted is rendered pursuant to the Unified Code of Corrections or, if such trial upon such first charge is terminated without judgment and there is no subsequent trial of, or adjudication of guilt after waiver of trial of, such first charge within a reasonable time, the person shall be tried upon all of the remaining charges thus pending within 160 days from the date on which such trial is terminated; if either such period of 160 days expires without the commencement of trial of, or adjudication of guilt after waiver of trial of, any of such remaining charges thus pending, such charge or charges shall be dismissed and barred for want of prosecution unless delay is occasioned by the defendant, by an examination for fitness ordered pursuant to Section 104-13 of this Act, by a fitness hearing, by an adjudication of unfitness for trial, by a continuance allowed pursuant to Section 114-4 of this Act after a court's determination of the defendant's physical incapacity for trial, or by an interlocutory appeal; provided, however, that if the court determines that the State has exercised without success due diligence to obtain evidence material to the case and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence may be obtained at a later day the court may continue the cause on application of the State for not more than an additional 60 days. (f) Delay occasioned by the defendant shall temporarily suspend for the time of the delay the period within which a person shall be tried as prescribed by subsections (a), (b), or (e) of this Section and on the day of expiration of the delay the said period shall continue at the point at which it was suspended. Where such delay occurs within 21 days of the end of the period within which a person shall be tried as prescribed by subsections (a), (b), or (e) of this Section, the court may continue the cause on application of the State for not more than an additional 21 days beyond the period prescribed by
Page 22 of 32
Defendant is entitled to jury trial. He can waive it though, but IT MUST BE IN WRITING.
A defendant, in a capital case, gets 20 peremptory challenges to get rid of a juror. Unlimited for-cause. In a non-capital case, a D gets 10 peremptory challenges, unlimited for-cause. Multi-Defendant cases: If it's a capital case, each D gets 12. If non-capital, each D gets 6.
Guilty Pleas - During a guilty plea, DEFENDANT MUST SPEAK FOR HIMSELF, on the record.
Supreme Court Rule 402 State does not have to agree to a 402, neither does a judge. Defendant gets the chance to withdraw plea within 30 days after making it.
Santabello v. New York - issue was "What are the consequences when defendant has pled, pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, and prosecution does not keep up its end of the deal?" It permits the withdrawal of the guilty plea, and defendant goes back into the "not guilty" stance. Discovery
Brady v. Maryland- ON FINAL o If exculpatory evidence (negates guilt, negative impact on sentencing) is in states control or that state could reasonably get w/in parameters of job it has to turn it over
Page 23 of 32
412: Disclose to the Accused o Cant get work product, info on CI's unless they were transactional to the offense o Nat'l security exception 413: Disclose to Prosecution o C) Medical & scientific report - must be given over if done o D) defense has to inform state of any defenses (including affirmative) intended to use at trial/hearing and witnesses/evidence; if alibi intended to be prove need specific info w/witnesses 725 ILCS 5/114-13 o Any officer participating in investigation of criminal case has statutory duty to provide state with anything state asks for o Gents Act: give stmt prior to testimony, make motion for early proffer Fed sec 3500: discovery of written stmts After direct, court on (D) motion, shall order pros to hand over anything in possession relating to subject matter of testimony Always do motion for early Gents disclosure 414: Evidence Depositions o Permissible to be used as substantive evidence where threat of witness not being at trial o D has right to confront & cross- ex any deposition witnesses 415: Catch All o Discovery cannot be impeded o Ct can provide protective orders on discovery o Sanctions for not complying w/ SCR: continuance granted Evidence excluded Other approp measure
PROOF OF PRIOR BAD ACTS FRE 609 and Montgomery Evidence Inadmissible because action and conformity therewith Exceptions: o Motive o Intent o Absence of mistake o Identity- knowledge o common scheme of plan Double Jeopardy & Res Judicata Operates to collaterally estop pros of something thats already been decided When already proven, cannot use in any further proceeding Ashe v. Swenson- when issue of ultimate fact has been litigated to final jdgmt, it cannot be later re-litigated Jury Trial/ Peremptory Challenges 725 ILCS 5/115-3 Ds challenges 12 member jury o 1D Capitol offense 20 perempt Unlim for cause o 1 D Non-capital 10 perempt Unlim for cause o Mtpl D Capitol offense
Page 24 of 32
Guilty Pleas
Batson- cannot use peremptory challenge to excuse jurors on basis of race Sequestration - Not until all evidence is received D can waive right to trial by jury BUT MUST BE WRITTEN - ON FINAL (725 ILCS 5/115-4) FRCP 11, 20 725 ILCS 5/115-2 Keep system moving SCR 402: conference w/judge, everyone bound by plea o State doesnt have to agree to 402 conference & neither does judge o Off record, after discovery, State gives plea offer o If state doesnt stick to offer, D can withdraw guilty plea o When D's atty requests 402 conference, judge must 'admonish' D in open court that: ( to determine if plea is knowing): Nature of charge Minimum & maximum penalty Giving up right to testify, have trial, present witnesses, present evidence, etc (to determine if plea is voluntary): Ask if were nay forces, promises, threats to induce D into accepting plea (other than the plea offer itself) (to find factual basis of plea (pros gives brief stmt of what happened & D must stipulate to it)): D must answer all above admonishments himself & must be on record By accepting plea, D is agreeing that he did what he was charged w/doing Non- 402 plea offer: o Judge does not have to accept it & Judge can offer plea o Governed by general principles of contract law o Cannot motion for substitution of judge bc u dont like offer judge makes o Judge cannot make state reduce the charges, can give minimal sentence Blind Plea: o No conference o No offer by state o D stands b4 judge: Asks to stipulate to facts Asks to enter guilty plea Asks judge to do ____ in return for guilty plea
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Grid that dictates sentencing per offense How to depart from them: o Get down levels 2 levels if D's guilty plea clearly shows acceptance of responsibility of bad conduct 3 levels if D makes prompt guilty plea On state's motion D has provided substantial assistance in the prosecution or investigation of another person- no rule of how many levels reduced, depends on circs Santobello v. NY o Consequences when D has plead pursuant to negotiated plea and pros does not keep up its end of the deal (pros says give D the max) o A significant promise not kept = D can withdraw guilty plea, reinstate plea on not guilty, case goes to trial
Page 25 of 32
Homicide Cases 725 ILCS 112 has all the information on grand juries we need to know. Plus, federal rules on grand juries. Only need 9 out of 16 people in a grand jury to indict a defendant. If there's 12? 9. Usually, they are unanimous. Don't let your client testify before a grand jury. Have him invoke his 5th amendment right against self-incrimination. Or, get him a grant of immunity beforehand. There must be a transcript of the grand jury proceeding, which you get for free as a defendant (unlike a preliminary hearing's transcript). The only thing not admissible at these things are privileged testimonies. www.law.cornell.edu Federal Rules - Much more indictments in federal cases. FR 5.1 - D has a right to a preliminary hearing in a federal case, unless he's indicted. Just like Illinois' system. Being charged by indictment trumps preliminary hearings. Sometimes, prosecutor doesn't want a grand jury proceeding. But, they are cheaper. And, there are no continuances and cops show up there b/c they are scheduled. Hurtado v. California - in federal court, you can be prosecuted by preliminary hearing or by indictment. State due process does not require a D to be indicted by grand jury only. Can be done by preliminary hearing. Batzen - applies to grand jury compositions as well. D has a right to ensure that the grand jury reflects a fair outlook of the community. D not a member of the excluded group can still argue it's not fair. Even if you're a white female, and it's a grand jury of all females, you can still complain. Costello v. US - it was an organized crime indictment. D was charged w/income tax evasion. The quantum of evidence was enormous, 141 witnesses on prosecutor's side. D said improper evidence was given to grand jury during indictment stage, b/c u can't have 3 government witnesses testifying to what 141 witnesses said. US Supreme Court said "Yes you can." As long as it's not discriminatory, it's okay really. Reviewing courts are typically very unwilling to mess with grand jury proceedings, particularly when there's not an equal protection issue. How about illegal arrests/illegally seized evidence? Warrants that are faulty? US v. Calandra - all that stuff is still admissible. It may be denied at trial, but may be needed to find a true bill by a grand jury. Confessions illegally obtained (b/c not voluntary), is that admissible before grand jury? YES. Defendant's like preliminary hearings over grand juries b/c they can cross-examine and get some discovery done. You get hired for not what will happen, but for your knowledge of what may happen. Can't make promises of what will happen, and can't charge on that. You get paid for what you know. Tell your client to be where he has to be 30 mins before he should, call him night before, tell him to dress appropriate, present himself well, lose the earrings, etc. What kind of prosecutorial conduct will lead to a reversal of the grand indictment from a grand jury?
Page 26 of 32
Page 27 of 32
Page 28 of 32
Page 29 of 32
Bordenkircher v. US - guilty plea offer given to D. D chose instead to go to trial and refused to plea bargain. Then, P amends the information to seek sentencing as a habitual criminal offender. Then, P was convicted and sentenced. On appeal, he said that violated his due process rights. U.S. Supreme Court said "No, he had his chance, and they had the right to up the ante when he turned down the guilty plea." State can up the charges on trial when the defendant refuses to plead guilty. QUESTIONS 1. 2 Ds charged jointly for murder, D A confesses & implicates DB o Separate trials under Bruton 2. Pursuant to pre trial discovery, List of rebuttal witnesses? -No 3. Goal of pretrial discovery o Narrow scope o Prevent trial by ambush o Both *** 4. Brady v Maryland- Exculpatory 5. Ill speedy trial, D on bond- 160 days out 6. Prelim hearing- Probable cause to detain 7. Felony- Info & indictment 8. D charged w felony gets formal charges- Arraignment 9. Issues in prelim hearing is probable cause in charging 10. State charges D w/ poss of controlled sub in prelim, D sues - State can seek indictment 11. Time state has for prelim- 30 days 12. Time state has for prelim when D is out on bond- 60 days 13. Witness who testified at prelim, cannot remember at trial what his testimony wasis his prior testimony admissible due to his being "unavailable" due to loss of memory o Yes, if D had opp to confront/cross-ex witness at prelim 14. Does D charged w felony have right to counsel at prelim- Yes, doesnt have to demand it 15. What kind of evid is admissible at prelim- Everything except when protected by privilege (atty/client, dr/patient, confessor/pennant) 16. Is hearsay admissible at either grand jury or prelim- Yes
Page 30 of 32
Page 31 of 32
Page 32 of 32