Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    DPC - 9 Civil Appeal

    Uploaded by

    Hari Hari
    this is civil appeal

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    DPC - 9 Civil Appeal

    Uploaded by

    Hari Hari
    14 views6 pages
    this is civil appeal

    Original Title

    DPC- 9 CIVIL APPEAL

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    this is civil appeal

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    14 views6 pages

    DPC - 9 Civil Appeal

    Uploaded by

    Hari Hari
    this is civil appeal

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL

    (UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC)

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ANDHRA PRADESH

    CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION

    FIRST APPEAL NO. OF 2020

    Mahes G,

    S/o krishna G

    Aged 47 years,

    R/o House No. 39, Gandhi Nagar,

    Kadapa. ………..Appellant

    -Vs-

    Subba Rao,

    S/o , Sundar Rao

    Aged 45 years.

    R/o House No. 77, OMR Road,

    Kadapa. ……..Respondent

    (Appeal against the judgement and decree passed by the Civil Judge, senior
    division, Andhra Pradesh on 1-09-2020) in Suit No. 15 of 2013.
    The Hon’ble Chief Justice,

    And companion or and other respected Judges of High Court.

    The Appellant, most respectfully, humbly, request that:

    1. That the respondent has filed the Suit No. 15 of 2013 in the court of civil
    judge, senior division, Chennai against the appellant for the recovery of
    Rs. 1 lakh which sum the appellant allegedly owed to the respondent
    against a sale of immovable property by a sale-deed executed by the
    appellant in favour of the respondent.
    2. The learned judge heard the said suit and passed a decree of Rs. 1.5 lakh
    against the appellant on 01-08-2020.
    3. The appellant being aggrieved by the said decree and judgment prefers
    this appeal on the following amongst other grounds:
    (i) That the learned judge erred in holding that the sale-deed was
    legally valid.
    (ii) That the sale-deed was invalid and hence not enforceable
    against the appellant.
    (iii) That no property was passed from the respondent to the
    appellant under the sale-deed.
    (iv) That the handwriting expert was not called in spite of the
    repeated requests from the appellant.
    (v) That the decision of the trail court is against justice, equity and
    goof conscience and hence not sustainable.
    4. The appellant has not filed any other appeal prior to this in the Hon’ble
    Court.

    It is, therefore. Humbly plaid that this honourable court may be pleased to
    allow the appeal and set aside the decree and the judgement of the court of
    the Civil Judge, Senior Division, kadapa, 1st of August, 2020 in the suit No.
    15 of 2013.

    Any other order which may be deemed fit in the interest of justice, may be in

    past in favour of appellant.

    PLACE: Kadapa

    DATE: 22-09-2024 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

    GROUNDS:

    The learned judge erred in holding that the sale-deed was legally valid.

    That the sale-deed was invalid and hence not enforceable against the appellant.

    No property was passed from the respondent to the appellant under sale-deed.

    The handwriting expert was not called in spite of the repeated requests from the
    appellant.

    The decisions of the trail court is against justice, equity, and good conscience
    and hence not sustainable.

    PRAYER:

    It is therefore, humbly prayed that this honourable court may be pleased to


    allow the appeal and set aside the decree and the judgment of the court of the
    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kadapa, 1st of August, 2020 in Suit No. 15 of
    2013.

    Any other order which may be deemed fit in the interest of justice, may be
    passed in favour of the appellant.
    VERIFICATION:

    I, Mahesh G, do hereby verify and declare that the contents of the above
    memorandum of appeal are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

    PLACE: KADAPA

    DATE: 22-09-2024 MAHESH G


    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ANDHRA PRADESH

    CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION

    FIRST APPEAL NO. OF 2020

    Mahes G,

    S/o krishna G

    Aged 47 years,

    R/o House No. 39, Gandhi Nagar,

    Kadapa. ………..Appellant

    -Vs-

    Subba Rao,

    S/o , Sundar Rao

    Aged 45 years.

    R/o House No. 77, OMR Road,

    Kadapa. ……..Respondent

    AFFIDAVIT

    I, MAHESH G, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND


    DECLARE THAT,

    I AM THE APPELLANT IN THE ABOVE:

    MENTIONED APPEAL.

    THE CONTENTS OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPPEAL FILED


    BY ME ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNWOLEDGE AND BELIEF.
    I HAVE NOT FILEF ANY OTHER APPEAL PRIOR TO THIS IN THE
    HOB’BLE COURT.

    I DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE TO THE BEST


    OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.

    PLACE: KADAPA

    DATE: 22-09-2024 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

    You might also like