Instant Download Foundations For Microstrip Circuit Design Fourth Edition Edwards PDF All Chapter
Instant Download Foundations For Microstrip Circuit Design Fourth Edition Edwards PDF All Chapter
Instant Download Foundations For Microstrip Circuit Design Fourth Edition Edwards PDF All Chapter
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/foundations-for-microstrip-
circuit-design-fourth-edition-edwards/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://textbookfull.com/product/practical-microstrip-and-
printed-antenna-design-anil-pandey/
https://textbookfull.com/product/wideband-circuit-design-first-
edition-carlin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/electronic-design-automation-
for-ic-implementation-circuit-design-and-process-technology-2nd-
edition-luciano-lavagno/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microelectronic-circuit-
design-5th-edition-2015-richard-c-jaeger/
Inverter-Based Circuit Design Techniques for Low Supply
Voltages 1st Edition Rakesh Kumar Palani
https://textbookfull.com/product/inverter-based-circuit-design-
techniques-for-low-supply-voltages-1st-edition-rakesh-kumar-
palani/
https://textbookfull.com/product/power-electronics-circuit-
analysis-and-design-issa-batarseh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-of-foundations-for-
offshore-wind-turbines-subhamoy-bhattacharya/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microwave-integrated-circuit-
components-design-through-matlab-1st-edition-s-raghavan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/circuit-design-with-vhdl-the-
mit-press-3rd-edition-volnei-a-pedroni/
FOUNDATIONS FOR
MICROSTRIP CIRCUIT
DESIGN
FOUNDATIONS FOR
MICROSTRIP CIRCUIT
DESIGN
FOURTH EDITION
Terry C. Edwards
Consultant
Michael B. Steer
North Carolina State University
This edition first published 2016
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Registered office
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for
permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any
form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be
available in electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and
product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing
this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of
this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is
sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the
publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert
assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
ISBN: 9781118936191
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Cover Image: © Michael Steer, Steven Lipa and Alan Victor
Typeset in 10/12pt TimesLTStd by SPi Global, Chennai, India
1 2016
List of Trademarks
Ansys® is a registered trademark of SAS IP, Inc.
AT&T® is a registered trademark of AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P.
Cuflon® , Polyflon® and Norclad® are registered trademarks of Crane Co.
DuPont® and Teflon® are registered trademarks of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
RT/Duroid® is a registered trademark of World Properties, Inc.
SONNET® is a trademark of Sonnet Software Inc.
Ultem® is a trademark of SABIC Global Technologies B.V.
LTE® is a registered trademark of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute.
WiMAX® is a registered trademark of the WiMAX Forum
Preface xxiii
Acknowledgements xxv
15 Slotline 443
15.1 Introduction 443
15.2 Basic Concept and Structure 444
15.3 Operating Principles and Modes 444
15.4 Propagation and Dispersion Characteristics 447
15.5 Evaluation of Guide Wavelength and Characteristic Impedance 451
15.6 Losses 453
15.7 End-effects: Open Circuits and Short Circuits 455
15.7.1 Jansen’s Results 455
15.7.2 Chramiec’s Measurements 459
15.7.3 Some Other Results 463
15.8 Summary 463
References 463
“Appended to the above letter, Mr. Miller wrote, without being able
to see a word:—
“‘God bless you, bless you all, and save you, is my prayer.
Wm. Miller.’
“After this, his general health was some improved, so that he was
able to be about and to busy himself with light work. He was able to
distinguish one object from another, and could often recognize his
friends and acquaintances; but, with the best glasses he could get,
he could not so distinguish letters as to read words. He sometimes
attempted to write without seeing the letters that he traced.
“On the 14th of September, 1848, he wrote to Mr. Himes:—
“About the last of April, 1849, his health began to decline more
rapidly. This being communicated by Mr. Miller’s son to Mr. Himes,
and received by him at New York during the session of the annual
Conference there on the 10th of May, 1849, he stated to the
Conference the intelligence, and moved that they convey to Mr. M.
an expression of sympathy. The following resolution was
immediately drawn up by the president, and unanimously adopted
by a rising vote:—
“Mr. Miller received the above on the 12th of May, by the hand of
his biographer. On entering his room, he was reclining on a lounge.
At the mention of his name, he immediately arose, and recognized
the messenger. He was much affected with the expression of
sympathy sent by the Conference, and returned the following reply,
which was received by the Conference at Boston, to which place it
had adjourned, where it was entered on its minutes, May 29, 1849.
“In November, 1849, Elder L. Kimball, who had had the charge of
the church in Low Hampton, took his leave of that people. He writes:
—
“‘Such was the state of the roads that I did not arrive there
till sunset. His house stood in sight of the stage-road to
Rutland, so that it was a subject for observation to all the
passengers in the stage. It was pointed out to me by one of
them, who lived in an adjoining village. It was to me a fruitful
subject, as I beheld, for the first time, both beauty and
sublimity in the cultivated vale and snow-capped, venerable
mountains in the vicinity. I thought how appropriate—how like
the hills and vales of Judea, where Amos and other shepherds
and former servants of the Most High lived, were called, and
sent to warn mankind!
“‘As I approached across the farm, I passed the grove
where he had meditated, wept, and prayed, and entered the
house of the aged, wornout, sick and dying servant of God,
who had been so scorned by the world. I felt favored of God.
I was welcomed in the simple, hearty, easy style of a Vermont
Christian farmer’s family. That pleasant, beaming
countenance of his wife, and the hearty shake of the hand,
told me I was at home; and the kettle of hominy, just taken
from the fire, was at once prophetic of my supper. And all the
members of the family, intelligent, modest, and cordial, made
me feel how really glad they were of the call, and to hear
from those abroad.
“‘I was quickly invited into the “east room,” where “Father
Miller” greeted me, though he could not see so as to know
me; but, when told, recollected distinctly. He was much
changed, and yet so changed as to leave all the good outlines
of former acquaintance behind. His sufferings through the
summer and fall had been very great. He was much swollen
by dropsy. His strength and sight were much diminished. His
venerable white locks were few and thin, and his flesh was
like that of a child. But his voice was full, his memory good,
his intellect strikingly strong and clear, and his patience and
resignation were remarkable. He asked of my welfare, and of
the friends; and said he was never so strong in his mind that
we were right as now. He was sure it could not be long
before the coming of the Lord. He wished him to come soon;
but, if not, to be taken himself to the Lord.’
“He was drawn to the table in his chair, and ate supper with the
family, probably for the last time. Elder R. left the next morning
between four and five o’clock; but Mr. Miller was awake, and arose
to take an affectionate leave of him.
“For several months he had been confined mostly to his room.
During a part of the time he had been confined to his bed, lounge,
or easy chair; and he suffered excruciating pain, which he endured
with Christian patience. During his greatest sufferings, he solaced
himself by quotations of numerous passages of Scripture, and
favorite hymns of Watts and others, expressive of the hope and joy
of the redeemed.
“He had watched all the occurrences in Europe with great interest;
but, giving up the idea of seeing the Saviour before his death, he
had arranged all his business, and waited for the summons when he
might ‘depart and be with Christ.’[89]
“On the 13th of December he had one of the most severe attacks
of pain which he was called to endure. It was then thought he would
not survive till the next morning, and Elder Himes was immediately
telegraphed for, at the request of Mr. M. Mr. Himes wrote:—
Mr. Shaw, pastor of the church, read the 90th psalm, and
addressed the throne of grace; after which the hymn—
“The death of Mr. Miller was very generally noticed by the religious
and secular press, many of whom spoke in just terms of his honesty
and ability. Other papers connected with his memory extravagances
with which he had no sympathy and never participated in.”
FOOTNOTES
[1] For a full exposition of the subject of the sanctuary and the
nature of its cleansing, see Thoughts on Daniel, by U. Smith, and
The Sanctuary and Twenty-three Hundred Days, by J. N.
Andrews.
[2] See John 14:3; Acts. 1:11; 1 Thess. 4:16; Rev. 1:7; Matt.
16:27; 24:30; Mark. 8:38; 13:26; Dan. 7:13.
[3] Dan. 7:14, 18, 22, 27; Matt. 25:34; Luke 12:32; 19:12, 15;
22:29; 1 Cor. 9:25; 2 Tim. 4:1, 8; James 1:12; 1 Pet. 5:4.
[4] 2 Pet. 3:7-10; Isa. 65:17-19; Rev. 21:22.
[5] 1 Cor. 15:20, 23, 49, 51-53; Phil. 3:20, 21; 1 Thess. 4:14-
17; 1 John 3:2.
[6] Isa. 34:8; 40:2, 5; 41:10-12; Rom. 8:21-23; 1 Cor. 1:7, 8;
4:14; 15:54, 56; Eph. 5:27; Col. 1:22; 1 Thess. 3:13; Heb. 2:13-
15; Jude 24; Rev. 20:1-6.
[7] It will be seen that Wm. Miller held the doctrine of
consciousness in death, which most of the Adventists have
renounced.
j. w.
[8] Ps. 50:3; 97:3; Isa. 60:15, 16; 24:21, 22; Dan. 7:10; Mal.
4:1; Matt. 3:12; John 25:29; Acts 24:15; 1 Cor. 3:13; 1 Thess.
5:2, 3; 2 Thess. 1:7-9; 1 Peter 1:7; 2 Peter 3:7, 10; Jude 6, 7, 14,
15; Rev. 20:3, 13-15.
[9] Ps. 37:9-11, 22, 28, 29, 34; Prov. 2:21, 22; 10:30; Isa.
40:21; Matt. 5:5; 6:10.
[10] Rev. 20:2-7.
[11] Matt. 13:37-43; 24:14; Dan. 7:21, 22; 2 Thess. 2:8.
[12] 2 Pet. 3; Isa. 65:17; Rev. 21:22.
[13] Rom. 2:14, 15; 4:13; 9:6; 10:12; 11:17; Gal. 3:29; Eph.
2:14, 15.
[14] The supposition that two of the periods of Daniel extended
to the second advent constituted Mr. Miller’s mistake, hence the
consequent disappointment.
j. w.
[15] At this place they raised, and placed in his hands, quite a
sum of money for his services. He took $1.50 to pay his stage
fare to the next place, and directed them to give the balance to
some benevolent object.
[16] A son of Mr. M., who was at that time postmaster in Low
Hampton.
[17] Mr. M. was in the habit of replying to those who denied
that God has revealed the time by asking them: “What ‘wonders’
are referred to in Daniel 12:6?” “Who gave the answer to the
inquiry there asked?” and “If those ‘wonders’ include the
resurrection,—and the Lord has sworn with an oath that it shall
be for a time, times, and a half,—is not the time revealed?”
adding. “Whether we understand it correctly or not, is another
question.”
[18] See Introduction, vol. 1, p. 333; vol. 4, pp. 189, 191.
[19] See Harmony of Scripture.
[20] Theol. Dic., p. 228.
[21] A Hebrew scholar, of high reputation, makes the following
remarks upon the word: “The verb chathak (in the Niphal form,
passive, nechtak), is found only in Daniel 9:24. Not another
instance of its use can be traced in the entire Hebrew Testament.
As Chaldaic and Rabbinical usage must give us the true sense of
the word: if we are guided by these, it has the single signification
of cutting or cutting off. In the Chaldeo-Rabbinic dictionary of
Stockius, the word ‘chathak’ is thus defined:—
“‘Scidit, abscidit, conscidit, inscidit, excidit.’—To cut, to cut
away, to cut in pieces, to cut or engrave, to cut off.
“Mercerus, in his ‘Thesaurus,’ furnishes a specimen of
Rabbinical usage in the phrase chathikah shelbasar—‘a piece of
flesh,’ or ‘a cut of flesh.’ He translates the word as it occurs in
Daniel 9:24, by ‘præcisa est’—was cut off.
“In the literal version of Arias Montanus it is translated ‘decisa
est’—was cut off; in the marginal reading, which is grammatically
correct, it is rendered by the plural ‘decisæ sunt’—were cut off.
“In the Latin version of Junius and Tremellius, nechtak is
rendered ‘decisæ sunt.’—were cut off.
“Again: in Theodotion’s Greek version of Daniel (which is the
version used in the Vatican copy of the Septuagint as being the
most faithful), it is rendered by συνετμἡθησαν—were cut off; and
in the Venetian copy by τετμήνται—have been cut. The idea of
cutting off is pursued in the Vulgate, where the phrase is
‘abbreviatæ sunt,’ have been shortened.
“Thus Chaldaic and Rabbinical authority, and that of the earliest
versions,—the Septuagint and Vulgate,—give the single
signification of cutting off to this verb.”
[25] While it may now appear very evident that the stand taken
by Mr. Miller, relative to the character, and the final results, of the
fanaticism of which he speaks, was a proper and right one, it is
not so clear that he disposed of the question of the gifts and
manifestations of the Spirit of God, in harmony with the general
scope of Scripture testimony upon the subject. The reader will
observe that he does not produce the proof, in his accustomed
style of proving his points, that the great commission, with its
duties, and its blessings, was given to the ministry for only a
limited portion of the Christian age. Mr. Miller, Mr. Himes, and
other leading Adventists, failed to show the time when, and by
whom, the gifts were removed from the church of God. This gave
the fanatics great advantage; and as they maintained the
scriptural position upon the perpetuity of spiritual gifts they
gained very large numbers to their ranks. The false positions of
those who opposed them added fuel to the flame of fanaticism
already kindled, and resulted in the breaking up of the once
united and happy body of believers.
Seventh-day Adventists have held the scriptural position upon
the perpetuity of the gifts from their first existence. They have
taken heed to the admonition of Paul to “Despise not
prophesyings;” but to “Prove all things;” and “Hold fast that
which is good.” 2 Thess. 5:20, 21. They have with their Bibles in
their hands applied the rule of John by which to test the spirits.
“Believe not every spirit; but try the spirits, whether they are of
God.” 1 John 4:1. With this position those who have held it have
been prepared to meet every form of fanaticism that has sought a
place among us, and now our people are reaping the good fruits
of their patient, firm, and energetic efforts upon this point, in the
unparalleled union and order throughout the ranks. We would not
encourage a disposition to blame those who acted according to
the best light they had under the pressure of the trials of the
past; but we here express our solemn conviction that very much
of the past fanaticism and confusion among the Adventists who
could not adopt an unscriptural position, is chargeable to those
leaders who took a false position relative to the perpetuity of
spiritual gifts.
j. w.
[29] The leading object in giving matter of this kind from the
pen of Mr. Miller is to let the Christian character and tender spirit
of the man appear, whom God had raised up to do a great work.
He had been a brave soldier in the service of his country, and had
fearlessly stood in defense of unpopular truth, and had dared to
meet opposition, scoffs, and even scandal, from the popular
churches. But now, under the most trying circumstances, we see
the aged Christian warrior, clothed with humility as with a
garment, and his spirit all softened and sweetened by divine
grace, tenderly entreating his brethren to be patient, gentle, true,
and kind.
j. w.
[86] With Mr. Miller, there were very many who deplored the
spirit in which the Babylon question was handled by rash spirits,
and a very few, including Mr. Miller, never accepted the view that
the term applied to all corrupted Christianity, Protestant as well as
Papal. But we do not regard the error of these a tithe as injurious
to the cause of truth and religion as the conduct of selfish and
rash ones who held the truth in unrighteousness.
j. w.
[87] The reader may now understand the real position of the
man whom God had led in the great movement which occurred in
fulfillment of the first message of Rev. 14. We believe that the
third message, now being proclaimed, and the preparatory work
for the coming of the Son of man now in progress with those who
embrace it, is by the direct providence of God, in fulfillment of
certain portions of his word. And this position makes the
conclusions that the first and second messages of the same series
were given under the same providence, and that God raised up
William Miller to bring out the great truths of the first message,
appear very reasonable. Hence we are the more willing to let him
speak for himself, that the candid reader may correctly view this
representative and providential servant of Jesus Christ, whose
name is associated in the public mind with Adventism
everywhere.
But few public men “grow old gracefully.” Mr. Miller entered
upon his public labors as a lecturer upon the prophecies in the
strength of manhood, after acquiring habits of self-reliance,
firmness, and undaunted courage, as an army and civil officer.
And this stamp of character, sanctified by the grace of God,
constituted one of the important qualifications necessary to meet
the different forms of determined opposition and persecution
which he met. And then, after nerving himself to the battle for
thirteen years, forming the strongest combative habits at that
period of his life when he was about sixty years of age, when
strong men’s habits generally become very strongly established,
to see him calmly and gently laying off the armor, and under his
bitter disappointment, to witness his resignation to the will of
God, and his affectionate appeals and warnings to his younger
brethren to be holy men of God, ready for the coming of the Son
of man, carries the strongest conviction to candid minds that God
had raised him up to do the very work which he did do. As he
thus laid his armor off, he said to his brethren that his work was
done. In this we can see the hand of God. He had spent the
strength of his ripe manhood in giving the first message. His
burden fell off, which he interpreted, for a short time, to mean
that the work of warning sinners was done. But the great work of
the third message was then in the future, and had God designed
to use him in giving it, he would have given him a new lease of
life, and opened the subject to his mind. But he did not see this
work nor feel its importance; and why should he? He had done
his work faithfully and well, and was soon to sleep in Jesus.
It is proper here to state that Mr. Miller did not view the second
message as we do. Neither did he change his views upon the
immortality and Sabbath questions. Having finished his mission in
giving the first message, and having reached the point in respect
to age and debility, from his extremely arduous labors as a
lecturer for thirteen years, with no periods of cessation, only
when compelled by sickness, the candid reader can see the love
and wisdom of God in not impressing his mind with those
subjects which he could not investigate and vindicate before the
people.
Having done, and well done, the great work given him to do,
the probation of public labor with him successfully past according
to the will of God, he could say in the language of Paul, “I have
fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the
faith; henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness,
which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day;
and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his
appearing.” 2 Tim. 4:7, 8.
It is just what might be expected, that those who
understandingly embrace the principles of the third message,
would first inquire relative to the second and first messages, and
would feel the deepest interest in the man whom God raised up
to lead off in the opening work of giving the great threefold
warning to the world.
Those who have been continually publishing a new time upon
the heels of a failure, have been, not only disgusting the public,
but, at each effort, have been virtually condemning the position
of Mr. Miller on the time question, and losing regard for his
valuable labors. These can have but little, if any, interest in his life
and views.
And on the other hand, those who stood with him on the time
question in 1844, and have confessed to the world that they were
in error, and have given up their past second-advent experience,
virtually condemn his position and work, and can take,
comparatively, but little interest in the history of his life, views,
and labors. Both of these classes have departed from the position
of Mr. Miller, and have denied, or, at least, hold very lightly their
past second-advent experience, and have left the field to
Seventh-day Adventists, who stand upon the “original advent
faith.” And while occupying the position we do relative to the past
movement, the public have reason to expect that, while we hold
that Mr. Miller moved in the providence of God in his work, we
should publish the facts as they existed in his life, views, and
labors, in explanation and defense, so far as such facts constitute
a defense, of our position.
We still love the advent name, and hold it very dear. And while
we hold the name, consistency would lead us to cherish and also
hold dear the very means that made us Adventists. To still hold
the advent name, and turn round and curse, or deny, or even
hold lightly, the means God employed to make us what we are,
seems the very climax of inconsistency. When Seventh-day
Adventists can no longer honor the great second-advent
movement, but feel called upon to confess to the world that the
pioneers of the cause were mistaken on the very calculation that
shook the world, and which resulted in making Adventists a
separate people, then they will drop “Adventists” from their
denominational name, and pass for simply Sabbatarian Christians.
j. w.
[89] Mr. Bliss, Mr. Miller’s biographer, served a party who held
the popular views of consciousness in death. This is also true of
Eld. Himes, who professed faith in the same views of man in
death at that time. This accounts for the decided efforts of both
these friends of Mr. Miller to use his last experience on the side of
natural immortality. It is proper, however, here to state that Eld.
Himes, when differently related to the Advent people, was
suddenly and unexpectedly found on the other side of the
immortality question, and has since given his pen and voice in
support of unconsciousness in death and immortality alone
through Christ. The effort to use the honest convictions of this
aged and wornout pilgrim before and at his last sickness on the
side of popular error shows a want of plain Bible testimony to
sustain a sinking cause.
The state between the cessation of the mortal life and the
resurrection to immortal life being unconsciousness, hence no
apparent lapse of time do those who sleep in Jesus, it seems
most reasonable that the Holy Spirit should impress the dying
Christian with the scenes of glory which he is next to witness at
the resurrection of the just, whether the time of that resurrection
to consciousness be near or distant. And how very natural for
those who die in the faith of consciousness in death to suppose
that they immediately enter upon the glories of the heavenly
world.
j. w.
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.