Unit 3
Unit 3
In this module, the developing mind is discovered through the theories of Jean Piaget
and Lev Vygotsky. The module will provide answers on the nature of knowledge among
children and how their knowledge change at different pace and time. It is because
experiences of children can influence their cognitive development. It will also look into the
diverse factors affecting language and cognitive development and as well as the theories of
intelligence.
This unit will be completed in 12 hours.
In this Unit, you are expected to:
1. Differentiate Piaget’s cognitive theory and Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory;
2. Explain the crucial role of language to the development of higher-level thinking,
reasoning, and memory processes;
3. Understand the different factors affecting cognitive and language development;
4. Explore changes in human mind with emphasis on individual differences and
intelligence;
5. Draw implications of these cognitive development theories, theories of intelligence,
and theories of language development to education, child care, and parenting;
6. Critique researches on cognitive development of children and adolescents.
LET’S START
Try This!
Rebus puzzles are designed to test your IQ by showing words in a certain way
and you have to understand what these words try to say.
Watch this video in this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXmXS84DPKc
Answer the following questions:
1. How many correct answers did you get?
2. Was it difficult to answer? Why?
Scheme
Piaget proposes that cognition develops through the enhancement and modification of
mental structures or schemes. A scheme is a pattern of thought or action and represents the
real world. (Shaffer and Kipp, 2007). It is any concept or idea on how the world works.
Schemes are used by children to interpret and organize the world they live in.
Accommodation
Accommodation is the process of modifying existing structures in order to account for
new experiences. It is the change of cognitive structures or the existing scheme in order to
incorporate or adapt to a new experience.
Equilibration
Equilibration refers to the force which drives the learning process. A child
experiences equilibrium when his schemas can deal with most new information through
assimilation. However, a state of disequilibrium occurs when new information cannot be
incorporated into existing schemas Equilibrium is restored through successful
accommodation. (McLeod, S. A., 2018)
Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development proposes that children pass through
different stages suggests that children move through four different stages of intellectual
development which reflect the increasing sophistication of children's thought. (McLeod, S.
A., 2018)
http://sociologycanvas.pbworks.com/w/page/61769093/Sensorimotor%20stage%20of%20development
Table. 1. Summary of the Piaget’s Account of Sensorimotor Development
1. Reflex activity Exercising and accommodation Some reflexive Tracks moving object but
(0–1 month) of inborn reflexes. imitation of motor ignores its disappearance.
responses
2. Primary circular Repeating interesting acts that Repetition of own Looks intently at the spot
reactions are centered on one’s own body. behavior that is where an object
(1–4 months) mimicked by a disappeared
companion
3. Secondary circular Repeating interesting acts that Repetition of own Searches for partly
reactions are directed toward external behavior that is concealed object
(4–8 months) objects. mimicked by a
companion
5. Tertiary circular Experimenting to find new Systematic Searches for and finds
reactions ways to solve problems or imitation of novel object that has been visibly
(12–18 months) reproduce interesting outcomes. responses; deferred displaced
imitation of simple
motor acts after a
long delay
6. Invention of new First evidence of insight as the Deferred imitation Object concept is
means through child solves problems at an of complex complete; searches for and
mental combinations internal, symbolic level. behavioral finds objects that have
(18–24 months) sequences. been
hidden through invisible
displacements.
http://psych123.weebly.com/psych-journal/journal-2-jean-piagets-
constructivist-theory-of-cognitive-development
a. Classification
Classification can be sorting into categories or understanding that there are sub-
classes within a group. The child classifies what is in the environment into living things
and non-living things. But the child can understand that there are sub-classes within a
group, like animals and plants or solid, liquid, and gas.
b. Conservation
Conservation is the concept that something can stay the same in quantity even
though it looks different. That ball of clay is the same amount whether flatten it or rolled
into ball.
c. Decentration
Children need to understand decentration so they can figure out conservation.
Decentration is focused on several factors at the same time. A row of 10 cookies is a row
of 10 cookies, no matter how far apart they are spaced. At this stage, the child realizes
length and number can be manipulated at the same time.
d. Reversibility
Reversibility involves figuring out that actions can be reversed. It is some sort of
mental gymnastics. Here, the child can understand that your pet is Nifu, Nifu is a dog, and
a dog is an animal.
e. Seriation
Seriation is about mentally sorting a group of things into some sort of order. The
child can arrange the toy cars according to color, or from smallest to biggest.
f. Sociocentricity
Sociocentricity is the ability of the child to understand that other people have their
own thoughts, feelings, and timetable. (https://www.healthline.com/health/childrens-
health/concrete-operational-stage)
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/candimgs/FVMtfI/CNX_Psych_09_04_Reasoning.jpg
The ability to thinking about abstract ideas and situations is the key hallmark of
the formal operational stage of cognitive development. The ability to systematically plan
for the future and reason about hypothetical situations are also critical abilities that
emerge during this stage. (Kendra Cherry, 2020)
The following are the characteristics of adolescents in formal operational stage:
Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning
The benchmark of formal operations is what Piaget referred to as hypothetico-
deductive reasoning (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958). Deductive reasoning, which entails
reasoning from the general to the specific, much as Sherlock Holmes would do in
examining the clues to a crime to catch the villain, is not, in itself, a formal operational
ability. (: (Shaffer and Kipp, 2007)
Thinking Like a Scientist
In addition to the development of deductive reasoning abilities, formal-operational
children are hypothesized to be able to think inductively, going from specific observations
to broad generalizations. Inductive reasoning is the type of thinking that scientists display,
where hypotheses are generated and then systematically tested in experiments. : (Shaffer
and Kipp, 2007)
Relativistic Thinking
Adolescents are more likely to engage in relativistic thinking—in other words,
they are more likely to question others’ assertions and less likely to accept information as
absolute truth. Through experience outside the family circle, they learn that rules they
were taught as absolute are actually relativistic. They begin to differentiate between rules
crafted from common sense (don’t touch a hot stove) and those that are based on
culturally relative standards (codes of etiquette). This can lead to a period of questioning
authority in all domains. (https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-
lifespandevelopment/chapter/cognitive-development-in-adolescence/)
LET’S PRACTICE
a. Watch the video clip, Piaget's stages of cognitive development | Processing the
Environment | MCAT | Khan Academy which you can access at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt3-PIC2nCs
b. The video-clip provides audio-visual explanation of Piaget’s theory of cognitive
development.
c. Provide substantial answer in not more than 200 words to the following questions:
2. What are the differences in cognitive abilities of preoperational children and concrete
operational children?
3. What stage of Piaget ‘s Cognitive Development do you think you are in and why?
LET’S ASSESS
Check This!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Activity 2. Give some practical ways to teach children in each of Piaget's four stages of
Cognitive Development.
References:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-lifespandevelopment/chapter/cognitive-
development-in-adolescence/ on August 7, 2020
https://www.healthline.com/health/childrens-health/concrete-operational-stage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u06yS0t2wyQ https://
Lesson 2. Lev Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development
Loraine S. Tattao, RGC, RPsy, LPT, PhD.
Social and cultural context are important in individual development. The development
of higher mental processes originates from social processes.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this lesson, you are expected to:
1. Explain socio-cultural influences on cognitive development;
2. Differentiate Piaget and Vygotsky’s theories;
3. Identify educational implications of Vygotsky’s theory.
LET’S START
Do This! Take the Challenge!
Identify the following images. Please write the first thought that comes to your mind.
1. What images have you identified?
LET’S LEARN
” By giving our students practice in talking with others, we give them frames for thinking
on their own” – Lev Vygotsky
Lev Vygotsky believed that social interaction is crucial in cognitive development.
Vygotsky claimed that upon birth, humans are born with elementary mental functions which
are attention, sensation, perception, and memory. These elementary mental functions are
developed into higher mental functions through interaction with the environment. Vygotsky
believed that children construct knowledge actively through social interaction.
Social Influences on Cognitive Development
Like Piaget, Vygotsky believes that young children are curious and actively involved
in their own learning and the discovery and development of new understandings/schema.
However, Vygotsky placed more emphasis on social contributions to the process of
development, whereas Piaget emphasized self-initiated discovery.
According to Vygotsky (1978), much important learning by the child occurs through
social interaction with a skillful tutor. The tutor may model behaviors and/or provide verbal
instructions for the child. Vygotsky refers to this as cooperative or collaborative dialogue.
The child seeks to understand the actions or instructions provided by the tutor (often the
parent or teacher) then internalizes the information, using it to guide or regulate their own
performance.
Shaffer (1996) gives the example of a young girl who is given her first jigsaw. Alone,
she performs poorly in attempting to solve the puzzle. The father then sits with her and
describes or demonstrates some basic strategies, such as finding all the corner/edge pieces
and provides a couple of pieces for the child to put together herself and offers encouragement
when she does so.
As the child becomes more competent, the father allows the child to work more
independently. According to Vygotsky, this type of social interaction involving cooperative
or collaborative dialogue promotes cognitive development.
Concepts of Vygotsky’s Socio cultural theory
In order to gain an understanding of Vygotsky's theories on cognitive development,
one must understand two of the main principles of Vygotsky's work: More Knowledgeable
Other (MKO) and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).
More Knowledgeable Other
The more knowledgeable other (MKO) is somewhat self-explanatory; it refers to
someone who has a better understanding or a higher ability level than the learner, with
respect to a particular task, process, or concept.
Zone of Proximal Development
The concept of the More Knowledgeable Other is integrally related to the second
important principle of Vygotsky's work, the Zone of Proximal Development.
This is an important concept that relates to the difference between what a child can
achieve independently and what a child can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a
skilled partner.
Vygotsky (1978) sees the Zone of Proximal Development as the area where the most
sensitive instruction or guidance should be given - allowing the child to develop skills they
will then use on their own - developing higher mental functions. (Robert Slavin)
Scaffolding
Vygotsky’s concept of scaffolding is closely related to the concept of the Zone of
Proximal Development. Scaffolding refers to the temporary support given to a child by a
More Knowledgeable Other that enables the child to perform a task until such time that the
child can perform this task independently. According to Vygotsky’s theory, scaffolding
entails changing the quality and quantity of support provided to a child in the course of a
teaching session. The MKO adjusts the level of guidance in order to fit the student’s current
level of performance. (https://www.psychologynoteshq.com/vygotsky-theory/)
Vygotsky's theory differs from that of Piaget in a number of important ways:
1: Vygotsky places more emphasis on culture affecting cognitive
development.
This contradicts Piaget's view of universal stages and content of development (Vygotsky does
not refer to stages in the way that Piaget does). Hence Vygotsky assumes cognitive
development varies across cultures, whereas Piaget states cognitive development is mostly
universal across cultures.
2: Vygotsky places considerably more emphasis on social factors contributing to
cognitive development.
Vygotsky states cognitive development stems from social interactions from guided learning
within the zone of proximal development as children and their partner's co-construct
knowledge. In contrast, Piaget maintains that cognitive development stems largely from
independent explorations in which children construct knowledge of their own. For Vygotsky,
the environment in which children grow up will influence how they think and what they think
about.
3: Vygotsky places more (and different) emphasis on the role of language in cognitive
development.
According to Piaget, language depends on thought for its development (i.e., thought comes
before language). For Vygotsky, thought and language are initially separate systems from the
beginning of life, merging at around three years of age, producing verbal thought (inner
speech).
For Vygotsky, cognitive development results from an internalization of language.
4: According to Vygotsky adults are an important source of cognitive development.
Adults transmit their culture's tools of intellectual adaptation that children internalize. In
contrast, Piaget emphasizes the importance of peers as peer interaction promotes social
perspective taking.
LET’S PRACTICE
Try this! Answer me!
Answer the following questions in not more than 250 words:
1. Discuss the concepts of the zone of proximal development and apprenticeship in
thinking as they relate to cognitive development.
3. You can learn more about the theory of Lev Vygotsky by clicking on the
following links: Write your learning insights after watching the video clips.
a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eSgt6rStzg (Scaffolding)
b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Im_GrCgrVA (Zone of proximal development)
c. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP2K6-tp1uM (Socio-cultural theory
of Vygotsky)
LET’S ASSESS
Read each statement below and determine which concept of Vygotsky is described.
Write the letter of your choice on the space provided.
A. Zone of Proximal Development
B. More Knowledgeable Other
C. Scaffolding
1. Vygotsky’s term for the range of tasks that are too complex to be
mastered alone but can be accomplished with guidance and encouragement from a more
skillful partner.
2. Adult-child interactions in which children’s cognitions and modes of thinking
are shaped as they participate with or observe adults engaged in culturally relevant activities.
3. Process by which an expert, when instructing a novice, responds contingently
to the novice’s behavior in a learning situation, so that the novice gradually increases his or
her understanding of a problem.
4. When teachers assist students to adult-like activities, Vygotsky's
theory explains this as an example of .
5. Vygotsky’s emphasizes the importance of a more experienced other
who serves as a guide to the learner. It is called .
6. The teacher notices that Mariel cannot solve a problem on her own, but can
when she is given either adult or peer guidance.
7. Engaging the students in guided participation
8. Mr. Gonzaga teaches students how to perform an overhand throw by
gently guiding each student through the correct movement a few times.
9. Several parents who are making costumes for an elementary school play ask
the young cast members to assist them with such tasks as cutting fabric, pinning pieces
together, and sewing simple hems.
10. Process by which an expert, when instructing a novice, responds
contingently to the novice’s behavior in a learning situation, so that the novice
gradually increases his or her understanding of a problem
References:
INTRODUCTION
Most people think of intelligence as describing "how smart" someone is. However,
the actual definition is quite a bit more complicated than that. Psychological researchers and
theorists have actively debated and argued over how to best define and measure intelligence
for over one hundred years. Individual theorists and researchers have disagreed on which
mixture of cognitive skills and mental capacities (problem solving, abstract thinking,
creativity, memory, concentration, interpersonal skills, body/movement skills, etc.) should be
included within the definition, and how to measure these important attributes in a fair, culture
free manner. At present, intelligence is best thought of not as a single ability or attribute, but
rather as a global construct encompassing many different and separate cognitive abilities.
Learning Objectives:
ACTIVITY
INTELLIGENCE is…..
• a set of skills that makes it possible for a person to solve problems in life;
• the potential for finding or creating solutions for problems, which involves
gathering new knowledge.
- HOWARD GARDNER
Binet and colleague Theodore Simon developed a series of tests designed to assess
mental abilities. Rather than focus on learned information such as math and reading, Binet
instead concentrated on other mental abilities such as attention and memory. The scale they
developed became known as the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale.
The test was later revised by psychologist Lewis Terman and became known as the
Stanford-Binet. While Binet's original intent was to use the test to identify children who
needed additional academic assistance, the test soon became a means to identify those
deemed "feeble-minded" by the eugenics movement. Eugenics was the belief that the human
population could be genetically improved by controlling who was allowed to have children.
By doing this, the eugenicists believed they could produce more desirable inherited
characteristics.
This shift in how the test was used is notable since Binet himself believed that the
intelligence test he had designed had limitations. He believed that intelligence was complex
and could not be fully captured by a single quantitative measure. He also believed that
intelligence was not fixed. Perhaps most importantly, Binet also felt that such measures of
intelligence were not always generalizable and could only apply to children with similar
backgrounds and experiences.
Today, Alfred Binet is often cited as one of the most influential psychologists in
history. While his intelligence scale serves as the basis for modern intelligence tests, Binet
himself did not believe that his test measured a permanent or inborn degree of intelligence.
According to Binet, an individual's score can vary. He also suggested that factors such
as motivation and other variables can play a role in test scores.
Spearman and the Theory of General Intelligence
Spearman noted that while a child or an adolescent certainly could and often did excel
in certain areas, the ones who did well in one area tended also to do well in other areas. For
example, a child or an adolescent who does well on a verbal test would probably also do well
on other tests.
Those who hold this view believe that intelligence can be measured and expressed by
a single number, such as an IQ score. The idea is that this underlying general intelligence
influences performance on all cognitive tasks.
General intelligence can be compared to athleticism. One might be a very skilled
runner, but this does not necessarily mean that they will also be excellent figure skaters.
However, because this person is athletic and fit, they will probably perform much better on
other physical tasks than an individual who is less coordinated and more sedentary.
Charles Spearman was one of the researchers who helped develop a statistical technique known as
factor analysis. Factor analysis allows researchers to use a number of different test items to measure
common abilities. For example, researchers might find that people who score well on questions that
measure vocabulary also perform better on questions related to reading comprehension.
Many modern intelligence tests, including the Stanford-Binet, measure some of the
cognitive factors that are thought to make up general intelligence.
This theory was proposed by Howard Gardner in 1983 as a model of intelligence that
differentiates intelligence into various specific (primarily sensory) modalities rather than
seeing it as dominated by a single general ability.
▪ INTRAPERSONAL - children who are especially in touch with their own feelings,
values and ideas. They may tend to be more reserved, but they are actually quite
intuitive about what they learn and how it relates to themselves.
▪ INTERPERSONAL - children who are noticeably people oriented and outgoing, and
do their learning cooperatively in groups or with a partner. These children may have
typically been identified as "talkative" or " too concerned about being social" in a
traditional setting.
▪ NATURALIST - children who love the outdoors, animals, field trips. More than this,
though, these students love to pick up on subtle differences in meanings. The
traditional classroom has not been accommodating to these children.
Research on the components of human intelligence has shown that although children
generally become faster in information processing with age, not all components are executed
more rapidly with age. The encoding component first shows a decrease in processing time
with age, and then an increase. Apparently, older children realize that their best strategy is to
spend more time in encoding the terms of a problem so that they later will be able to spend
less time in making sense of these encodings. Similarly, better reasoners tend to spend
relatively more time than do poorer reasoners in global, up-front metacomponential planning
when they solve difficult reasoning problems. Poorer reasoners, on the other hand, tend to
spend relatively more time in detailed planning as they proceed through a problem.
Presumably, the better reasoners recognize that it is better to invest more time up front so as
to be able to process a problem more efficiently later on.
Sternberg noted that students who have high academic abilities might still not have
what is required to be a successful graduate student or a competent professional. To do well
as a graduate student, the person needs to be creative. The second type of intelligence
emphasizes this quality.
In work with creative intelligence problems, Robert Sternberg and Todd Lubart asked
sixty-three people to create various kinds of products in the realms of writing, art,
advertising, and science. For example, in writing, they would be asked to write very short
stories, for which the investigators would give them a choice of titles, such as "Beyond the
Edge" or "The Octopus's Sneakers." In art, the participants were asked to produce art
compositions with titles such as "The Beginning of Time" or "Earth from an Insect's Point of
View." Participants created two products in each domain.
Sternberg and Lubart found that creativity is relatively, although not wholly, domain-
specific. In other words, people are frequently creative in some domains, but not in others.
They also found that correlations with conventional ability tests were modest to moderate,
demonstrating that tests of creative intelligence measure skills that are largely different from
those measured by conventional intelligence tests.
A potential graduate student might be strong academically and have creative ideas, but
still be lacking in the social skills required to work effectively with others or to practice good
judgment in a variety of situations. This common sense is the third type of intelligence.
This type of intelligence helps a person know when problems need to be solved. Practical
intelligence can help a person know how to act and what to wear for job interviews, when to
get out of problematic relationships, how to get along with others at work, and when to make
changes to reduce stress.
Principle Example
APPLICATION
1. Writing Prompts
Spearman is well-known for proposing the g factor, which refers to general mental
ability. He observed that children's school performance was essentially consistent across all
school subjects, rather than being high in some subjects and low in others. This led him to
believe that there was a predominant general ability factor of intelligence.
What is your personal opinion of intelligence? For example, you may agree with
Spearman's g factor, because you have observed consistency in abilities across domains in your
friends and family. Conversely, you may feel more aligned with Gardner's theory of multiple
intelligences because you feel that you have high intellectual ability in some areas and low
intellectual ability in others. Write two to three paragraphs describing your ideas about
intelligence, citing supporting observations.
2. Create a Concept map or a Graphic Organizer to illustrate the Theories of Intelligence
discussed in this unit
3. What responses can be made by either parents or teachers for varied types of cognitive
achievement patterns?
If they’re done early, they’re allowed to choose from a few “quiet choices” (reading, writing,
drawing, puzzles, etc.).
We also do literacy and math games, songs, etc. during circle time. It’s a great time to connect
and talk about how the day’s gone.
a. To what extent do you think that preschoolers are being prepared for their
future student role? What are the pros and cons of such preparation? Give bullet
point answers.
References
A. Books
Acero, Victorina D. et.al (2008). Child and Adolescent Development (1st Edition). Ex Book
Store, Inc.
Corpuz, Brenda B. et.al (2018). The Child and Adolescent Learners and Learning Principles.
Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
B. Internet
https://fun-a-day.com/preschool-schedule/
https://www.intelltheory.com/binet.shtml
https://www.verywellmind.com/theories-of-intelligence-2795035
https://www.intelltheory.com/spearman.shtml
https://www.intelltheory.com/lthurstone.shtml
https://www.intelltheory.com/sternberg.shtml
C. Factors Affective Cognitive Development
Loraine S. Tattao, RGC, RPsy, LPT, PhD
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this lesson, you are expected to:
1. Explain the different factors affecting cognitive development.
2. Reflect on the variations in cognitive development.
3. Summarize research on factors affecting cognitive development.
LET’S START
Try This!
Read the following result from a study titled, “Determinants of Cognitive Development in the
Early Life of Children in Bhaktapur, Nepal”.
Determinants of the Cognitive Composite Score
The cognitive composite score was positively associated with the length-for-age
z-score. Children who were born with low birth weight (<2500 gm) had 5 points lower
cognitive composite scores compared to children with birth weight in the normal range.
Those who had been hospitalized during the first month of life had an average 4.7 points
lower scores compared to those with no such history. A history of alcohol consumption in
the father and reports of physical punishment during the past week were also predictors
for the cognitive score.
Think Pair Share: Explain the differences in the composite scores of the respondents in the study.
LET’S LEARN
Nature and Nurture
The most basic question about child development is how nature and nurture together
shape development. Nature refers to our biological endowment; the genes we receive from our
parents. Nurture refers to the environments, social as well as physical, that influence our
development, everything from the womb in which we develop before birth to the homes in which
we grow up, the schools we attend, and the many people with whom we interact.
(https://nobaproject.com/modules/cognitive-development-in-childhood)
Why do people differ so dramatically in the scores that they make on IQ tests? In
addressing this issue, we will briefly review the evidence for hereditary and environmental
influences and then take a closer look at several important social and cultural correlates of
intellectual performance.
The Evidence for Heredity
Twin Studies
The intellectual resemblance between pairs of individuals living in the same home
increases as a function of their kinship (that is, genetic similarity). For example, the IQ
correlation for identical twins, who inherit identical genes, is substantially higher than the IQ
correlations for fraternal twins and non-twin siblings, who have only half of their genes in
common (Bower, 2003).
Adoption Studies
Adopted children’s IQs are more highly correlated with the IQs of their biological parents
than with those of their adoptive parents. This finding can be interpreted as evidence for a
genetic influence on IQ, for adoptees share genes with their biological parents but not with their
adoptive caregiver. A person’s genotype may influence the type of environment that he or she is
likely to experience. Indeed, Scarr and McCartney (1983) have proposed that people seek out
environments that are compatible with their genetic predispositions, so that identical twins (who
share identical genes) select and experience more similar environments than fraternal twins or
non-twin siblings do. This is a major reason that identical twins resemble each other
intellectually throughout life, whereas the intellectual resemblances between fraternal twins or
non-twin siblings become progressively smaller over time (McCartney, Harris, & Bernieri,
1990).
The Evidence for Environment
The evidence for environmental effects on intelligence comes from a variety of sources.
For example, there is a small to moderate intellectual resemblance between pairs of genetically
unrelated children who live in the same household— a resemblance that can only be attributable
to their common rearing environment because they share no genes. Children who remain in
impoverished rearing environments show a progressive decline (or cumulative-deficit) in IQ,
thus implying that economic disadvantage inhibits intellectual growth.
The Flynn Effect
People have been getting smarter throughout the 20th century. Average IQs in all
countries studied have increased about 3 points per decade since 1940, a phenomenon called the
Flynn effect after its discoverer, James Flynn (1987, 1996; Howard, 2005; Teasdale & Owen,
2005). An increase this large that occurs this quickly cannot be due to evolution and must
therefore have environmental causes. So what might be responsible for improving IQ scores?
Worldwide improvements in education could increase IQs in three ways: helping people
to become more test-wise, more knowledgeable in general, and more likely to rely on
sophisticated problem-solving strategies (Flieller, 1999; Flynn, 1996). Yet, improved education
is probably not the sole contributor because the Flynn effect is much clearer on measures of fluid
intelligence, even though one might expect crystallized intelligence to benefit most from
educational enrichment. Twentieth-century improvements in nutrition and health care are two
other potent environmental factors that many believe to have contributed to improved intellectual
performance by helping to optimize the development of growing brains and nervous systems.
(Shaffer and Kipp, Katherine, 2007).
LET’S PRACTICE
Try This!
Read the following findings in a research conducted and come up with your own synthesis and
analysis.
Ten Environmental Risk Factors Associated with Low IQ and Mean IQs at Age 4 of Children
Who Did or Did Not Experience Each Risk Factor
Mean IQ at age 4
Risk factor Child Child did not
Experienced experience risk
Risk Factor factor
Child is member of minority group 90 110
Head of household is unemployed or low-skilled 90 108
worker
Mother did not complete high school 92 109
Family has four or more children 94 105
Father is absent from family 95 106
Family experienced many stressful life events 97 105
Parents have rigid child-rearing values 92 107
Mother is highly anxious/distressed 97 107
Mother has poor mental health/diagnosed disorder 99 107
Mother shows little positive affect toward child 88 107
Source: Data and descriptions compiled from “Stability of intelligence from Preschool to Adolescence:
The Influence of Social and Family Risk Factors,” by A.J. Sameroff, R. Seifer, A. Bladwin, and C.
Baldwin, 1993, Child Development, 64, 80–97
LET’S ASSESS
Check This
Answer in not more than 250 words the following questions:
1. Explain what is meant by the Flynn effect and discuss some potential reasons for this effect.
3. Tutors and tutorial centers proliferate for children nowadays to assist them in their
studies. When children have tutors or are enrolled in tutorial centers, which contributes to
their high performance, nature or nurture? Justify your answer.
References:
Shaffer, David and Kipp, Katherine (2007). Developmental Psychology: Childhood and
Adolescence, Seventh Edition. https://www.Ebook777.com
Sameroff, A.J., et.al. (1993). “Stability of intelligence from Preschool to Adolescence: The
Influence of Social and Family Risk Factors,” Child Development, 64, 80–97
https://nobaproject.com/modules/cognitive-development-in-childhood
LET’S START
Try This!
Walking Through
Interview your parents or any significant others in your life about how you learned to
talk. What were the word/word you uttered first? How did you communicate your needs? At
what age did you started uttering single words/phrases/sentences? Summarize your interview by
creating a story, spoken poetry, or painting about the information you gathered.
LET’S LEARN
The Concept of Language Development
According to Bell (1981), language refers to sounds, letters, their combinations into
larger units such as words, sentences and so forth. Such a set of forms would also be expected to
have meaning and the elements and sequences, by virtue of having meaning, would naturally be
expected to be used for communication between individuals who shared the same rules. (p. 19)
Therefore, language has meaning to individuals who share the same understanding and language
helps people to communicate. (http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/725/Module09.pdf?
sequence=12&isAllowed=y)
Five Components of Language
Perhaps the most basic question that psycholinguists have tried to answer is the “what”
question: What must children learn in order to master their native language? After many years
and literally thousands of studies, researchers have concluded that five kinds of knowledge
underlie the growth of linguistic proficiency: phonology, morphology, semantics, syntax, and
pragmatics.
Phonology
Phonology refers to the basic units of sound, or phonemes, that are used in a language
and the rules for combining these sounds. Each language uses only a subset of the sounds that
humans are capable of generating, and no two languages have precisely the same phonologies—a
fact that explains why foreign languages may sound rather strange to us. Clearly, children must
learn how to discriminate, produce, and combine the speech like sounds of their native language
in order to make sense of the speech they hear and to be understood when they try to speak
(Kelley, Jones, & Fein, 2004).
Morphology
Rules of morphology specify how words are formed from sounds (Kelley, Jones, & Fein,
2004). In English, these rules include the rule for forming past tenses of verbs by adding –ed and
the rule for forming plurals by adding -s, as well as rules for using other prefixes and suffixes,
and rules that specify proper combinations of sounds to form meaningful words. We learn, for
example, that flow (not vlow) is how to describe what the river is doing.
Semantics
Semantics refers to the meanings expressed in words and sentences (Kelley, Jones, &
Fein, 2004). The smallest meaningful units of language are morphemes, and there are two types.
Free morphemes can stand alone as words (for example, dog), whereas bound morphemes cannot
stand alone but change meaning when attached to a free morpheme (for example, adding the
bound morpheme -s to the word dog means that the speaker is talking about more than one
pooch). Children must recognize that words and bound grammatical morphemes convey meaning
—that they symbolize particular objects, actions, and relations and can be combined to form
larger and more complex meanings (sentences)—before they can comprehend others’ speech and
be understood when they speak.
Syntax
Language also involves syntax, or the rules that specify how words are to be combined to
form meaningful phrases and sentences (Kelley, Jones, & Fein, 2004). Consider these three
sentences:
1. Garfield Odie bit.
2. Garfield bit Odie.
3. Odie bit Garfield.
Even very young speakers of English recognize that the first sentence violates the rules of
English sentence structure, although this word order would be perfectly acceptable in languages
with a different syntax, such as French. The second and third sentences are grammatical English
sentences that contain the same words but convey very different meanings. They also illustrate
how word meanings (semantics) interact with sentence structure (word order) to give the entire
sentence a meaning. Children must master rules of syntax before they can become proficient at
speaking or understanding a language.
Pragmatics
Children must also master the pragmatics of language—knowledge of how language
might be used to communicate effectively (Diesendruck & Markson, 2001; Kelley, Jones, &
Fein, 2004). Imagine a 6-year-old who is trying to explain a new game to her 2-year-old brother.
She cannot speak to the toddler as if he were an adult or an age-mate; she will have to adjust her
speech to his linguistic capabilities if she hopes to be understood.
Jerome Bruner argues that parents provide their children a language acquisition support
system or LASS. The LASS is a collection of strategies that parents employ to facilitate their
children’s acquisition of language.
Language Development
Communication in Infancy
Do newborns communicate? Certainly, they do. They do not, however, communicate with the
use of language. Instead, they communicate their thoughts and needs with body posture (being
relaxed or still), gestures, cries, and facial expressions. A person who spends adequate time with
an infant can learn which cries indicate pain and which ones indicate hunger, discomfort, or
frustration.
Intentional Vocalizations
Cooing and taking turns: Infants begin to vocalize and repeat vocalizations within the first
couple of months of life. That gurgling, musical vocalization called cooing can serve as a source
of entertainment to an infant who has been laid down for a nap or seated in a carrier on a car ride.
Cooing serves as practice for vocalization as well as the infant hears the sound of his or her own
voice and tries to repeat sounds that are entertaining. Infants also begin to learn the pace and
pause of conversation as they alternate their vocalization with that of someone else and then take
their turn again when the other person’s vocalization has stopped. Cooing initially involves
making vowel sounds like “oooo.” Later, consonants are added to vocalizations such as
“nananananana.”
Babbling and Gesturing
At about four to six months of age, infants begin making even more elaborate
vocalizations that include the sounds required for any language. Guttural sounds, clicks,
consonants, and vowel sounds stand ready to equip the child with the ability to repeat whatever
sounds are characteristic of the language heard. Eventually, these sounds will no longer be used
as the infant grow more accustomed to a particular language. Deaf babies also use gestures to
communicate wants, reactions, and feelings. Because gesturing seems to be easier than
vocalization for some toddlers, sign language is sometimes taught to enhance one’s ability to
communicate by making use of the ease of gesturing. The rhythm and pattern of language is used
when deaf babies sign just as it is when hearing babies babble.
Understanding
At around ten months of age, the infant can understand more than he or she can say. You
may have experienced this phenomenon as well if you have ever tried to learn a second
language. You may have been able to follow a conversation more easily than to contribute to it.
Holophrasic Speech
Children begin using their first words at about 12 or 13 months of age and may use
partial words to convey thoughts at even younger ages. These one-word expressions are referred
to as holophrasic speech. For example, the child may say “ju” for the word “juice” and use this
sound when referring to a bottle. The listener must interpret the meaning of the holophrase and
when this is someone who has spent time with the child, interpretation is not too difficult. They
know that “ju” means “juice” which means the baby wants some milk! But, someone who has
not been around the child will have trouble knowing what is meant. Imagine the parent who to a
friend exclaims, “Ezra’s talking all the time now!” The friend hears only “ju da ga” which, the
parent explains, means “I want some milk when I go with Daddy.”
Under-extension
A child who learns that a word stands for an object may initially think that the word can
be used for only that particular object. Only the family’s Irish Setter is a “doggie”. This is
referred to as under-extension. More often, however, a child may think that a label applies to all
objects that are similar to the original object. In over-extension all animals become “doggies”,
for example.
First Words and Cultural Influences
First words if the child is using English tend to be nouns. The child labels objects such as
cup or ball. In a verb-friendly language such as Chinese, however, children may learn more
verbs. This may also be due to the different emphasis given to objects based on culture. Chinese
children may be taught to notice action and relationship between objects while children from the
United States may be taught to name an object and its qualities (color, texture, size, etc.). These
differences can be seen when comparing interpretations of art by older students from China and
the United States.
B. PSYCHOSOCİAL FACTORS
1. Early Stimulation
2. Family Structure or Literate Environment
3. Child’s Attitude (i.e. not very interested in language, prefers other modalities like
physical activities.)
4. Economic Status
5. Changes in child’s environment (e.g. moving.)
6. Short attention span.
7. Exposure to too many languages for the child.
8. Inadequate awareness of communication, lacks “communication intent”.
LET’S PRACTICE
Try This!
Answer in not more than 200 words the following questions:
1. If a child uses a word incorrectly, how can you help him or her to use it correctly?
2. How would you help learners in your class who have difficulty in constructing
correct sentences?
3. List points from your study of the concepts and theories of language development that you
consider having been of greatest help. How will these make you a better teacher?
4. Discuss how you should apply the theories in language development to obtain the best results
from your teaching and students.
5. Draw a figure to represent the interactionist view of language acquisition. Explain how this
model incorporates nature and nurture influences and explain the bidirectional aspect of the
model.
LET’S ASSESS
Check This
Matching: Demonstrate your understanding of the five basic components of language by
matching the names of these components with their definitions below.
A. morphology
B. phonology
C. pragmatics
D. semantics
E. syntax
1. The sound system of a language and the rules for combining these sounds to
produce meaningful units of speech.
2. Rules governing the formation of meaningful words from sounds.
3. The expressed meaning of words and sentences.
4. The structure of a language; the rules specifying how words and grammatical markers
are to be combined to produce meaningful sentences.
5. Principles that underlie the effective and appropriate use of language in social contexts.
Read the following cases and apply the different theories in this unit justifying your answer.
Two excellent case studies reflect nicely on this idea. One is the case of Genie, a child
who was locked away in a back room as an infant and was not discovered by the authorities until
she was nearly 14 years old. While confined, Genie heard very little language; no one was
permitted to talk to her, and she was beaten by an abusive father if she made any noise (Curtiss,
1977). Then there is Chelsea, a deaf woman who—because of her deafness and her family’s
isolation—was 32 years old before she was ever exposed to a formal language system. Extensive
efforts were undertaken to teach these women language, and each made remarkable progress,
learning the meaning of many words and even producing lengthy sentences that were rich in
their semantic content. Yet neither woman has mastered the rules of syntax that virtually all
children acquire without formal instruction (Curtiss, 1977, 1988), thus suggesting that learning a
first language is easier early in life.
References:
Shaffer, David and Kipp, Katherine (2007). Developmental Psychology: Childhood and
Adolescence, Seventh Edition. https://www.Ebook777.com
Module 9: Child Development. The Commonwealth of Learning retrieved from
http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/725/Module09.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y