Draft AOM 2024 001 STo. Nino
Draft AOM 2024 001 STo. Nino
Draft AOM 2024 001 STo. Nino
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
REGIONAL OFFICE NO. VIII
LGAS C – Leyte II and Biliran Province
Provincial Satellite Auditing Office (PSAO)
Baybay City, Leyte
MICHELLE L. EFREN
Municipal Accountant
We have audited some of the Barangay transactions for Calendar Years 2020,
2021 and 2022 and 2023 and observed the following deficiencies:
1. The accuracy, existence and valuation of all properties of the barangay under
Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) amounting to ₱9,764,582.21 as of
December 31, 2023, continued to be unconfirmed due to a) non-conduct of
physical count of its properties for CY 2023 and non-maintenance of
Property Cards by the Designated Property Custodian, contrary to Item
7.2.5, Chapter VII of Manual on the Financial Management of Barangays
and other pertinent COA rules and regulations.
1.2. Likewise, Item 2.1.6 of COA Circular No. 2010-001 requires the Accountants to
submit subsidiary schedules of general ledger accounts, on or before February 14
of each year.
1.3. The Statement of Financial Position for CY 2023 of Barangay Sto. Niño reflected
a total amount of ₱9,764,582.21 properties under Property, Plant and Equipment
(PPE) account. The details are shown in Table 1.
1.4. However, no inventory report has been provided to the Audit Team as of
December 2023. Only the inventory report as of December 2022 was submitted to
the audit Team as the Barangays are required to so submit such in the Bureau of
Treasury during the renewal of their fidelity bonds.
1.6. The RIPE is intended to confirm the existence of the reported assets in the books
of the Barangay and validate whether these assets are within the vicinity of the
same or in its designated location. Without the RIPE, the amount in the books
cannot be substantiated while the existence of the properties cannot be confirmed.
Losses, damages or unserviceable properties will not be detected and the persons
liable for such losses may not be held accountable thereof.
1.7. Due to the above mentioned deficiencies, the accuracy, existence and reliability of
the PPE accounts cannot be confirmed which will affect the fair presentation of
the Barangay’s assets in its Financial Statements.
1.9. We also recommend that the Barangay Treasurer as the Property Officer
Designate to maintain Property Cards for all properties of the Barangay.
1.10. Lastly, we recommend that the Barangay Treasurer as the Property Officer-
Designate and the Municipal Accountant should periodically reconcile their
respective records so as to establish a more reliable PPE balance.
2.0. Prior year’s unexpended DRRMF were not included in the LDRRMF
Investment Plan for CYs 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, contrary to Sections 4.4
and 5.1.2 of COA Circular 2012-002, thus, the funds were not used and left
idle in the bank.
2.1. Section 4.4 of COA Circular 2012-002 states “The unexpended LDRRMF shall
accrue to a special trust fund solely for the purpose of supporting disaster risk
reduction and management activities of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction
Management Council (LDRRMC) within the next five years. The LDRRMCs
shall decide on the use of the unexpended balance of LDRRMF which shall
be incorporated in the Local Disaster Risk Reduction Management Fund
Investment Plan.”
2.4. Upon examination of the LDRRMF Investment Plan attached to the Annual
Budget, it was observed that the LDRRMF Investment Plan only included the
items/activities intended to be undertaken/procured out of the current year’s
budget.
2.5. Consequently, the unexpended balances of prior years’ cannot be used in the
absence of the LDRRMFIP which should have indicated the PPAs for which said
prior years’ balances will be used for.
2.6. While it is true that the BDRRM Council will decide on the use of the
unexpended balance of LDRRMF, the same should be reflected in the
LDRRMFIP. Moreover, the continued non-utilization of the unexpended
LDRRMF from previous years left the funds idle in the bank instead of using it to
improve the LGU’s capability on disaster mitigation, prevention and
preparedness.
2.8. We also recommend that the Punong Barangay, as Chairman of the LDRRM
Council, identify the project/s to be funded from the unexpended BDRRM
Fund of previous years, incorporate the same in the LDRRMF Investment
Plan and implement the project/s to fully equip the Barangay and its
residents in times of disasters.
5% DRRMF Utilization
3.1. COA Circular No. 2012-002 dated September 12, 2012 on Accounting and
Reporting Guidelines of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
Fund (LDRRMF) of Local Government Units provides:
3.2. A LDRRMFIP for the DRRM program shall be prepared annually. It shall
present the 30% allocation for QRF in lump-sum and the allocation for disaster
mitigation, prevention and preparedness with details as to projects and activities to
be funded. The LDRRMFIP shall also include under a separate caption, the list
of projects and activities charged to the unexpended LDRRMF of previous years.
xxx.
3.3. Section 21 of Republic Act No. 10211 provides, “The present Local Calamity
Fund shall henceforth be known as the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Fund. Not less than five percent (5%) of the estimated revenue from
regular sources shall be set aside as the LDRRMF to support disaster risk
management activities such as, but not limited to, pre-disaster preparedness
programs including training, purchasing life-saving rescue equipment, supplies
and medicines, for post-disaster activities, and for payment of premiums on
calamity insurance. The LDRRMC shall monitor and evaluate the use and
disbursement of the LDRRMF based on the LDRRMP as incorporated in the local
development plans and annual work and financial plan. …”
3.4. DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2012-73was issued to provide the list of early
warning systems, preparedness equipment and other equipage which may be
AOM No. 2024-001 Brgy. Sto. Niño, Abuyog, Leyte Page 5 of 15
procured by the LGUs from the 70% Mitigation Fund of its LDRRMF, depending
on the kind of disaster. Among these the following items:
Flooding Earthquake
* Rubber boats with live vests, rescue * Fork lift
whistles and megaphones * Grader
* Inflatable Rafts/ Boats * Hack Saw
* Rain Gauges * Backhoe
* Breathing Apparatus * Chisel
* Portable Generator Set * Electric Drill
* Illuminated Jackets (Night Light) * Chain Saw Electric
* Warning Bella * Concrete Cutter
* Bolt Cutters * Jack Hammer
* Life Buoys * Megaphone w/ siren & rescue whistle
* Pulling and Lifting Machine * Flashlight with batteries
* Chain Saw Electric * Work Gloves
* Portable Tower Light * Ax- weighing at least 6 lbs.
* Hand Gloves * Shovel-both flat head& pointed
* Hydraulic Cutter Hydraulic Spreader * Coils of rope and wire
* Power Pack Pump * Compass
* Core Hose Pipe 20 m. long * crowbar/claw tool- 36'' or longer
* Foldable Stretcher Search Lights * Safety Full Body Harness
* Hi-power Torches * Tent- Family Sized
* Emergency Torches * Sleeping Bags
* Emergency Lights Raincoat * Bolt Cutters
* Grapnel with Poly polypropylene rope * 10 ton chain pulley block
* Body Bags * Pulling and Lifting Machine
* Aluminum Ladder 24 ft. * 1" Manila rope 100 meters roll
* Electric Drill * Portable Tower Light
* Snap Link * Hard hat
* Eye Googles * Search, emergency light
* Waterproof Tents * Foldable Stretcher
* First Aid Boxes Fire Extinguisher * First Aid Boxes (50pax/ per box)
* Fire Extinguisher * Chain Saw
3.5. Based on existing regulations, the QRF shall be used only when there is a
declaration of a State of Calamity. If unused, the amount shall be transferred to a
Special Trust Fund on the succeeding year and such amount can be utilized for
other disaster-mitigation purposes. From the appropriations for QRF in Table 2,
finding No. 2 of this AOM, only the appropriation for CY 2023 cannot be used by
the Barangay unless there is a declaration of a State of Calamity on that year.
Thus, the total LDRRMF which the Barangay could have utilized for the 4-year
period amounted to ₱1,217,804.54, computed as follows:
3.6. Based on the submitted report of utilization provided by the Barangay through the
Barangay Bookkeeper, only ₱487,800.00 (see Table 3) was utilized out
of the total ₱1,087,563.79 available appropriation in CYs 2020, 2021, 2022 and
2023 hence, the capability of the Barangay to respond effectively during disasters
were not greatly improved.
3.7. The occurrence of several typhoons, earthquake and flooding for the past years
and the crisis brought by the COVID-19 pandemic should have been enough
reason for the Barangay Officials to actively perform their various responsibilities
and initiate the implementation of disaster-prevention and mitigation activities.
3.9. We recommend that the Punong Barangay implement the projects outlined
in the LDRRMFIP for the year, in order to equip the Barangay Officials and
constituents with essential skills and knowledge necessary to effectively
prepare for and manage disasters.
4.0. The Barangay’s 20% Development Fund for CYs 2020 to 2023 totaling
₱4,259,115.60 was appropriated and utilized solely for developmental
projects, in compliance with Section 3.2 of the Joint Memorandum Circular
No. 1 by the Department of Budget and Management, Department of
Finance, and Department of Interior and Local Government (DBM-DOF-
DILG), wherein five projects identified in its Annual Investment Plan (AIP)
were implemented during the year, yielding an implementation rate of 100%,
thus, attaining the intended purpose and objectives of the current year’s
development fund.
4.1. Section 287 of Republic Act (RA) No. 7160 states that “Each local government
unit shall appropriate in its annual budget no less than twenty percent (20%) of
its annual internal revenue allotment for development projects. xxx.”
4.2. Item 3.2 of DOF-DILG-DBM Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC) No. 1 dated
November 04, 2020, on the “Revised Guidelines on the Appropriation and
Utilization of the Twenty Percent (20%) of the Annual Internal Revenue
Allotment for Development Projects”, provides that:
3.2.4 xxx
4.3. During the conduct of our audit, it was noted that the Barangay had appropriated
projects for 20% Development Fund totaling to ₱679,128.40, ₱727,243.40,
₱999,195.00 and ₱1,853,548.80for CY 2020, 2021, CY 2022 and CY 2023,
respectively. Details in Table 4.
Table 4. Development Projects from 20% Development Fund for CY 2022-2023
CY PPA Amount
*Rehab of Covered Court 200,000.00
2020 *Annual Budget *Drainage Canal w/cover Zone 1-4 279,128.40
*Const. of Pathway 200,000.00
subtotal 2020 679,128.40
2021 *Annual Budget * Rehab of Covered Court 727,243.40
Improvement of Multi-Purpose Building
2022 *Annual Budget Phase 3 (Reverted in CY 2023 999,195.0
Supplemental Budget No. 1) 0
AOM No. 2024-001 Brgy. Sto. Niño, Abuyog, Leyte Page 9 of 15
CY PPA Amount
2023 *Annual Budget Rehab of covered court/MPBldg. 854,353.80
Supplemental Repair/Rehabilitation of Evacuation 999,195.0
Budget Center 0
subtotal 2023 1,853,548.80
Total 4,259,115.60
*unimplemented as of December 31, 2023
4.4. Analysis showed that the above PPAs are eligible to be charged under the 20%
Development Fund. The Development Plan did not include any expenditure items
that are not allowed to be charged against the Fund such as personal services,
administrative expenses, traveling expenses, training expenses, purchase,
maintenance or repair of administrative office’ equipment and motor vehicles for
administrative purposes.
4.6. The implementation of four identified development projects under the 20%
Development Fund in CYs 2020 to 2023 ensured that the desired socio-economic
development as identified in the Annual Investment Plan was maximized, thus,
the Barangay satisfactorily realized the intended purpose and objectives of the
fund. However, a total of ₱1,406,371.80 development projects were not
implemented as of December 31, 2023.
4.8. We recommend that the Punong Barangay and all personnel concerned fast
track the implementation of the remaining one unimplemented development
project and continuously adhere to the provisions of the aforementioned
DBM-DOF-DILG JMC, so that funds are utilized to its optimum to help
achieve the desirable socio-economic development and environmental
outcomes of the Barangay.
5.0. The Barangay Treasurer did not deposit her collections regularly, intact and
on time, contrary to Section 69(1) of PD 1445, COA Circular No. 92-382 and
Section 2.1 of COA Circular No. 97-002 and the Manual on Financial
Management of Barangays, thus exposing barangay funds to the risk of loss,
misuse or misappropriation.
5.1. Section 69(1) of PD 1445 provides: “Public officers authorized to receive and
collect moneys arising from taxes, revenues, or receipts of any kind shall remit or
deposit intact the full amounts so received and collected by them to the treasury of
the agency concerned and credited to the particular accounts to which the said
moneys belong. The amount of the collections ultimately payable to other
agencies of the government shall thereafter be remitted to the respective
treasuries of these agencies.”
5.2. Section 8 of COA Circular No. 92-382 dated July 3, 1992 issued to implement the
provisions of Republic Act No. 7160 states that all collections shall be deposited
intact with authorized depositories. The practice of retaining part of the collections
as a cash reserve for cash disbursements shall be discontinued.
5.3. Section 2.1 of COA Circular No. 97-002 dated February 10, 1997 also requires
that daily receipts of collections must be deposited intact with the proper bank.
5.4. Section 4.1.13 of the Manual on Financial Management of Barangays states that:
5.5. During the conduct of cash examination, it was noted that for the period
September 12, 2020 to December 31, 2023, the Barangay Treasurer (BT) did not
deposit her collections regularly. Moreover, comparison of the actual collections
and deposits disclosed that the collections were not deposited intact, as can be seen
in Table 6.
5.7. We recommend that the Barangay Treasurer deposit the full amount of
collections at the Barangay’s authorized government depository bank daily,
weekly or once the collections reach ₱5,000.00, whichever is applicable.
PS limitation
6.1. Section 331 (b) of Republic Act (RA) No. 7160 otherwise known as the Local
Government Code of 1991, states that “The total annual appropriations for
personal services of a barangay for one (1) fiscal year shall not exceed fifty-five
percent (55%) of the total annual income actually realized from local sources
during the next preceding fiscal year.”
6.2. DBM Local Budget Circular No. 98 issued on October 14, 2011, prescribed the
guidelines in determining compliance to the personal services (PS) limitation on
local government budgets. Section 4.2 thereof defines Personal Services (PS)
Limitation as the prohibition under Section 331 (b) of the Local Government
Code against appropriating funds for PS in excess of the limits set therein. It
6.3. Section 4.6 of the same Circular defines next preceding fiscal year as the fiscal
year that is two (2) years before a budget year. For example, if FY 2011 is the
budget year, the next preceding fiscal year is FY 2009.
6.4. Section 4.3 of the same Circular on the other hand provides items which are
waived in the determination of compliance to the PS limitation in LGU PS
budgets which includes payment of minimum Year-end Bonus of ₱1,000.00 for
the Punong Barangay and P600.00 for other mandatory barangay officials, and
their Cash Gifts.
6.5. Review of the annual budget of the barangay disclosed that appropriations for
Personal Services in CY 2021 to CY 2023 exceeded fifty-five percent (55%) of
the total annual income actually realized from local sources during the next
preceding fiscal year. The excess amount is computed in Table 7.
6.6. In addition, actual expenditures for CY 2020, CY 2021 and CY 2022 on personal
services also exceeded the ceiling for the reason that the budget itself for
provided a greater PS appropriation than what was required. Details on Table 8.
Table 8. Excess of Actual PS Expenditure over PS Limitation
2023 2022 2021 2020
PS Limitation 55% 2,041,340.40 1,899,827.21 1,714,787.28 1,536,716.34
Less: Actual PS Expenditures 2,056,136.00 2,200,421.00 2,015,254.69 1,756,156.00
Difference (14,795.60) (300,593.79) (300,467.41) (219,439.67)
Total PS cost for waived items 62,000.00 62,000.00 62,000.00 62,000.00
Excess (Difference less
waived items) 47,204.40 (238,593.79) (238,467.41) (157,439.67)
6.10. We further recommend that the barangay council should strive to find ways
to improve collection of revenues from local sources so that the Personal
Services ceiling will correspondingly increase.
May we have your comments on the foregoing audit observations within five (5)
calendar days from receipt hereof.
ARNE S. CABIGAS
State Auditor II
OIC- Audit Team Leader
SANTIAGO P. SEÑASE
State Auditor V
Supervising Auditor