Performance Management Plan
Performance Management Plan
Performance Management Plan
Sponsor 3/28/06
Not Started
Deliverables
Lead
12/1/04
11/15/04 2/1/05 3/22/05
4/30/05
3/31/05 4/15/05
1) Kick off meeting of technical group
1.4
1.5
After Phase 3
3/1/05
3) Very Basic Strategy Map 4) Gap Analysis Results and recommendations to fill out SPlan 5) Revised Strategic Plan 6) Revised Strategy Map
2.2
2.3
2.4 2.5
2.6
May require meetings and other events per the Communication Plan
2.7
Output from this step does not get 10) Feedback Collection acted upon until next annual planning System and Reports cycle.
3.2
DRAFT
Page 1 of 3
Project Plan
Date of Report Name Start Date Jun 30, 2005
Sponsor 3/28/06
Not Started
Deliverables
Lead
3.8
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5 Prototype test and revise database design of Balanced Scorecard System - (ESMS 5.6 5.7 Roll out test modules at pilot sites - flush out lessons learned and update IT Plans Cascade and development plan for Enterprise Strategic Management System (ESMS)
3/28/06
Status
Major Issues
Item No. 1 Description Comments
DRAFT
Page 2 of 3
Project Plan
Date of Report Name Start Date Jun 30, 2005
Sponsor 3/28/06
Not Started
Deliverables
Lead
DRAFT
Page 3 of 3
Definition
What is the PM number for What metric(s) should we use to referencing. Could be LMR # or measure whether we have met our a unique number for local requirements? metrics?
Is this measure a Customer, Process, Learn & Grow or Resources measure based on the BSC framework?
Insert major goals or objectives in this box as a reference in completing this template
Insert a list of the major organizational unit names in this box for reference in completing this template
Insert a Link here to reference back a list of Functions / Departments and other organizational units in completing this template
Insert the Operating Area such as Product or Service Line - To be used for Product Performance Analysis
What are the data elements Where does the data for caclulating the measure? reside?
What is the actual What is the actual result of this measure result of this measure for the Year 2003? for the Year 2004?
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 of 2
Definition
What is the PM number for What metric(s) should we use to Who is the primary owner referencing. Could be LMR # or measure whether we have met our for the measure and their a unique number for local requirements? email address? metrics?
Y/N
1 2 3 4 5 6
2 of 2
Leading or Lagging
Graded Attributes
Review and score all measurements used in your scorecard model F1.1 F1.2 F1.3 F1.4 F2.1 F2.2 F2.3 F2.4 F3.1 F3.2 F3.3 F3.4 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 P1.1 P1.2 P1.3 P1.4 P2.1 P2.2 P2.3 P2.4 P3.1 P3.2 P3.3 P3.4 P4.1 P4.2 P4.3 P4.4 L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L2.1 L2.2 L2.3 L2.4 L3.1 L3.2 L3.3 L3.4 % Revenue Growth
Total Points 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lagging
Single
Instructions: Rate each Measurement for these attributes on a scale of 1 to 5: 1. Update Frequency: Measurement can get updated on a regular basis; M for Monthly, Q for Quarterly, A for Annual, etc. 2. Degree of Reliability: Can you easily measure the performance objective or is it too subjective when it comes to measurability. 3. Encourages the right behavior: Measurements should not confuse, distort, or create the wrong performance behavior within the Organization. Controllable? 4. Degree of Fit: Measurement fits with the culture and processes of Organization and flows well from Lower Level to Upper Level. (MACRO FIT - ORGANIZATIONAL) 5. Degree of Support: Client has existing procedures and processes that can support the measurement (such as available data is in place) Maximum Score 25
NonGraded Attributes
M H
M M
Alignment Matrix
Vision
Mission
Values
Strategic Organization
Critical
Critical
Measures
Tools
Project Roster
Name Area Location Desk Phone Cell Phone Email
www.intranets.com