Greetings Maynor Galvez,

Courtroom Deputy Clerk for Honorable Jesus Gilberto Bernal Foreign Agent B.A.R. member
®Number 1477477.
I am Asim, the petitioner in account CV24 02122 JGB(DTBx), given you administrative and
commercial notice; knowledge pursuant to California Commercial Code 1202.
Please take notice to the undisputable facts herein beginning with October 3, 2024, (I.F.P.) - fee
waiver for court filings was recorded and filed into account, also October 29, 2024 Judicial
Notice: In Forma Pauperis Status Granted by Operation of Law was recorded and filed into
account, in addition, November 7, 2024, Judicial Notice: The United States Marshal Service
Serves the Summons and Complaint pursuant to (“IFP”) Status, was filed into account.
October 7, 2024, Judicial Notice: Notice of Summary Judgement as a Matter of Law pursuant to
General Admiralty Rule 56, was recorded and filed into account.
Pursuant to 13 CFR § 134.212 - Summary judgment - (2) Response. No later than 15 days after
the service of a motion for summary judgment, all non-moving parties must file and serve a
response to the motion or be deemed to have consented to the motion for summary judgment.
November 15, 2024 will be the deadline for all non-moving parties to file in response to
Summary Judgment, this includes a mandated response by administrating judge Jesus Bernal,
whom has failed and or refused to respond to the “motion” for IFP as mandated by operation of
law, whom has failed to respond to Judicial Notices, and the Judge Bernal has also failed and or
refused to inform the U.S. Marshal Services of their obligation of service of process.
Officers of the court are currently in CONTEMPT of due process of law.

OPERATION OF LAW / AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS

1. Judicial Notice: In Forma Pauperis Status granted as an operation of law. Pursuant to APP
-015/FW-015-INFO INFORMATION SHEET ON WAIVER OF APPELLATE COURT
FEES (SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEAL, APPELLATE DIVISION), The court
will waive your court fees and costs if: You are getting public assistance, such as Medi-
Cal, Food Stamps…, Under the law you are considered a low-income person if the gross
monthly income (before deductions for taxes) of your household is less than the amount
listed below: FAMILY SIZE: 1, FAMILY INCOME: $1,226.05.
2. Petition evidenced to all officers of the court October 3, 2024, that Petitioner’s ESTATE
receive public assistance and receive NO INCOME, ZERO, thus, mandating IFP status
by operation of law.
3. IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Courts are authorized to allow plaintiffs to file suit in forma
pauperis by 28 U.S. Code §1915. Bringing a suit in forma pauperis is available for both
district court claims and appeals. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/in_forma_pauperis .
4. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 4. SUMMONS (3) By a Marshal or
Someone Specially Appointed. At the plaintiff's request, the court may order that service
be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed
by the court. The court MUST so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma
pauperis under 28 U.S.C. §1915 or as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. §1916.
5. MUST. This word, like the word "SHALL," is primarily of mandatory effect; State ex
rel. McCabe v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. (Black’s Law 4 th Ed. Pg. 1171)

6. SHALL. In common or ordinary parlance, and in its ordinary signification, the term
"shall" is a word of command, and one which has always or which must be given a
compulsory meaning; as denoting obligation. It has a peremptory meaning, and it is
generally imperative or mandatory. It has the invariable significance of excluding the idea
of discretion, and has the significance of operating to impose a duty which may be
enforced, particularly if public policy is in favor of this meaning, or when addressed to
public officials, or where a public interest is involved, or where the public or persons
have rights which ought to be exercised or enforced, unless a contrary intent appears.
People v. O'Rourke, 124 Cal. App. 752, 13 P.2d 989, 992. (Black’s Law 4th Ed. Pg. 1541).

7. Ministerial Officer Jesus Gilberto Bernal is in CONTEMPT of due process of law,

amongst other constitutional violation not yet mentioned.

8. MINISTERIAL. That which is done under the authority of a superior; opposed to

judicial; that which involves obedience to instructions, but demands no special discretion,
judgement, or skill. Black’s Law 3rd Edition Page 1190.

9. MINISTERIAL ACT. One which a person performs in a prescribed manner, in

obedience to the mandate of legal authority, without regard to or the exercise of his own
judgment upon the propriety of the act being done. Pennington v. Streight, 54 Ind. 376;
Hair v. Struck, 29 Mont. 45, 74 P. 69, 63 L. R. A. 481; State v. Nash, 66 Ohio St. 612, 64
N. E. 558; Grider v. Tally, 7'[ Ala. 424, 54 Am. Rep. 65; In re Press Printers & Publishers
(C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 660, 662; State v. Bartholomew, 103 Conn. 607, 132 A. 30, 34; First
Nat. Hank v. Hayes, 186 Iowa, 892, 171 N. W. 715, 718 ; Boynton v. Brown (Tex. Civ.
App.) 164 S. W. 893,895. Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Edition Page 1191.

10. MINISTERIAL DUTY. A ministerial duty, the performance of which may in proper
cases be required of a public officer by judicial proceedings, is one in respect to which
nothing is left to discretion; it is a simple, definite duty arising under circumstances
admitted or proved to exist and imposed by law. State v. McGrath, 92 Mo. 355, 5 S. W.
29; Missis-sippi v. Johnson, 4 Wall. 498, 18 L. Ed. 437; People v. Jerome, 36 Misc. 256,
73 N. Y. S. 306; Duvall v. Swann, 94 􀄒Id. 608, 51 A. 617; Gled-hill v. Governor, 25 N. J.
 Law, 351; Houston v. Boltz, 169 Ky. 640, 185 S. W. 76, 80; Mott v. Hull, 51 Okl. 602,
152 P. 92, L. R. A. 1916B, 1184; Ham v. Los Angeles County, 46 Cal. A.pp. 148, 189 P.
462, 468. A ministerial duty arises when an individual has such a legal interest in its
performance that neglect of performance becomes a wrong to such in-dividual. Morton v.
Comptroller General, 4 S'. C. 473. Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Edition Page 1191.

11. MINISTERIAL OFFICER. One whose duties are purely ministerial, as distinguished
from executive, legislative, or judicial functions, requiring obedience to the mandates of
superiors and not involving the exercise of judgment or discretion. See U. S. v. Bell (C.
C.) 127 F. 1002; Waldoe v. Wallace, 12 Ind. 572; State v. Loechner, 65 Neb. 814, 91 N.
W. 874, 59 L. R. A. 915; Reid v. Hood, 2 Nott & McC. (S. C.) 169, 10 Am. Dec. 582.
Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Edition Page 1191.

12. Ministerial Act: A ministerial act is an act performed in a prescribed manner and in
obedience to a legal authority, without regard to one’s own judgment or discretion. The
distinction between ministerial acts and acts that are discretionary is often important to
determine whether a public official is shielded by qualified immunity. Generally,
ministerial acts are unshielded by qualified immunity, which protects only actions taken
pursuant to discretionary functions. In other words, noncompliance with a ministerial
duty bars.

13. MALADMINISTRA'TION, noun Bad management of public affairs; vicious or

defective conduct in administration, or the performance of official duties, particularly of
executive and ministerial duties, prescribed by law; as the maladministration of a king, or
of any chief magistrate.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Maladministration .

14. CLERICAL MISPRISION. Mistake or fraud perpetrated by clerk of court which is

susceptible of demonstration by face of record, or a clerical error, which is an error by
clerk in transcribing or otherwise apparent on the face of the record. Ballew v. Fowler,
285 Ky. 149, 147 S.W.2d 65, 66. But see Newman v. Ohio Valley Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,
221 Ky. 616, 299 S.W. 559, 560. (Pg. 319).

BONDING OF CORPORATE ENTITIES

(This is a verified plain statement of fact)
Maxims:
1. The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its
possession of commercial Bonds against Public Hazard.
2. No Bond means no responsibility, means no power of Official signature, means no real
corporate political power and means no privilege to operate statutes as the corporate vehicle.
3. The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a
responsible substitute for a Bond.
4. Municipal corporations, which include cities, counties, states and national governments, have
no commercial reality without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the
execution of its rulings).
5. In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer/Public Office to not receive and report a Claim to
its Bonding Company – and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the
Claim.
6. If a bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal
malpractice within (60) days, then it must pay the full-face value of a defaulted Lien process at
(90) days
7. PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENT: All officials are required by
Federal, State and Municipal Law to provide the name, address and telephone number of their
public hazard and malpractice bonding company, the policy number of the bond and if required,
a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.

CONCLUSION

Due to the constitutional violations of law committed by Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal, THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA has defaulted in this account (ED CV 24 02122 – JGB(DTBx)) with
respect to the violation of public office of trust, honor, and obligations to the living spiritual man.
Agent of THE STATE Judge Jesus G. Bernal, in his official capacity has violated his public
office of trust and honor, he is in breach of trust, he has damaged Petitioner’s right to due process
of law via obstruction of proceeding, and fraud upon the court.

Petitioner attest, no personal civil tort claim will necessarily be needed to file against Judge Jesus
Gilberto Bernal, pursuant to his constitutional violations of oath of public office/trust/honor, and
HONEST SERVICES FRAUD - 1341, 1343, 1346, should the STATE now in default, and
liable to Petitioner, pay claim in full to Petitioner within Thirty (30) days, no later than December
30, 2024.
Deputy Clerk Maynor Galvez, I accept your oath of office as a binding bi-lateral contact, as
fiduciary, I instruct you to forward this “NOTICE” to Clerk of Court Brian D. Karth, I shall
forward this notice to the superior of you corporation, and I shall publish this instrument for
public and private viewing.

Maynor Galvez, to remain in honor with your obligation of Honest Services in Good Faith in
Performance of your Duty under oath to the u.s. constitution, you MUST report claims against
malfeasant Officers for violation of Title LXX – CRIMES – CH.4. CRIMES AGAINST
JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws) SEC. 5407, it is a felony for the
Officer/Public Office to receive and not report a Claim to its Public Hazard and Malpractice
Bonding Company – and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the Claim.
Maynor Galvez, public trustee “Fully Personally Liable Now” on your honor and solemn Oath to
perform your obligations and duties to Protect My un-a-lien-able Rights in your Fiduciary
Capacity, I again accept you oath of office of public trust and honor as a binding bi-lateral
contract.
Return to me the name, address and telephone number of Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal’s public
hazard and malpractice bonding company, the policy number of the bond and if required, a copy
of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.
I, Chief Executor Asim Najee-Asmar Bey, and all my tribal members are witness to the
constitutional violations and conspiracy against my unalienable rights, violations committed by
Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal, now pending tort claims against said officers and all conspiring
officers of the court, notice given pursuant to 42 U.S. Code § 1986 - Action for neglect to
prevent.

In your public office of trust and honor, fiduciary / trustee capacity as Deputy Clerk, please do
not hesitate and file this claim with the Public Hazard and Malpractice Bonding Company
immediately, and get the malfeasant public official Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal prosecuted for
malpractice within (60) days, should the acting officers of the STATE not honor Petitioners
claim, then the Bonding Company will pay the full-face value to Petitioner of the defaulted Lien
process at (90) days, and at this stage Plaintiff will honor the operation of law and initiate civil
Gmail - Administrative & Commercial; Knowledge(COM 1202) To Maynor Galvez https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=e00edc8889&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r1639...

Asim Bey <[email protected]>

Administrative & Commercial; Knowledge(COM 1202) To Maynor Galvez

5 messages

Asim Bey <[email protected]> Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:10 PM

To: [email protected], [email protected], Cherie Robinson <[email protected]>, Asim Bey <[email protected]>, Asim Bey
<[email protected]>, [email protected], Anthony Davis <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], ohchr-
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], UCC_Support <[email protected]>

Greetings Maynor Galvez,

Courtroom Deputy Clerk for Honorable Jesus Gilberto Bernal Foreign Agent B.A.R. member ®Number 1477477.
I am Asim, the petitioner in account CV24 02122 JGB(DTBx), given you administrative and commercial notice; knowledge pursuant to California
Commercial Code 1202.
Please take notice to the undisputable facts herein beginning with October 3, 2024, (I.F.P.) - fee waiver for court filings was recorded and filed into
account, also October 29, 2024 Judicial Notice: In Forma Pauperis Status Granted by Operation of Law was recorded and filed into account, in addition,
November 7, 2024, Judicial Notice: The United States Marshal Service Serves the Summons and Complaint pursuant to (“IFP”) Status, was filed into
account.
October 7, 2024, Judicial Notice: Notice of Summary Judgement as a Matter of Law pursuant to General Admiralty Rule 56, was recorded and filed into
account.
Pursuant to 13 CFR § 134.212 - Summary judgment - (2) Response. No later than 15 days after the service of a motion for summary judgment, all non-
moving parties must file and serve a response to the motion or be deemed to have consented to the motion for summary judgment.
November 15, 2024 will be the deadline for all non-moving parties to file in response to Summary Judgment, this includes a mandated response by
administrating judge Jesus Bernal, whom has failed and or refused to respond to the “motion” for IFP as mandated by operation of law, whom has failed
to respond to Judicial Notices, and the Judge Bernal has also failed and or refused to inform the U.S. Marshal Services of their obligation of service of
process.
Officers of the court are currently in CONTEMPT of due process of law.

OPERATION OF LAW / AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS

1. Judicial Notice: In Forma Pauperis Status granted as an operation of law. Pursuant to APP -015/FW-015-INFO INFORMATION SHEET ON
WAIVER OF APPELLATE COURT FEES (SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEAL, APPELLATE DIVISION), The court will waive your
court fees and costs if: You are getting public assistance, such as Medi-Cal, Food Stamps…, Under the law you are considered a low-income
person if the gross monthly income (before deductions for taxes) of your household is less than the amount listed below: FAMILY SIZE: 1,
FAMILY INCOME: $1,226.05.
2. Petition evidenced to all officers of the court October 3, 2024, that Petitioner’s ESTATE receive public assistance and receive NO INCOME,
ZERO, thus, mandating IFP status by operation of law.
3. IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Courts are authorized to allow plaintiffs to file suit in forma pauperis by 28 U.S. Code §1915. Bringing a suit in forma
pauperis is available for both district court claims and appeals. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/in_forma_pauperis .

4. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 4. SUMMONS (3) By a Marshal or Someone Specially Appointed. At the plaintiff's request,
the court may order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed by the court. The court
MUST so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. §1915 or as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. §1916.
5. MUST. This word, like the word "SHALL," is primarily of mandatory effect; State ex rel. McCabe v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist.
(Black’s Law 4th Ed. Pg. 1171)
6. SHALL. In common or ordinary parlance, and in its ordinary signification, the term "shall" is a word of command, and one which has always or
which must be given a compulsory meaning; as denoting obligation. It has a peremptory meaning, and it is generally imperative or mandatory. It
has the invariable significance of excluding the idea of discretion, and has the significance of operating to impose a duty which may be enforced,
particularly if public policy is in favor of this meaning, or when addressed to public officials, or where a public interest is involved, or where the
public or persons have rights which ought to be exercised or enforced, unless a contrary intent appears. People v. O'Rourke, 124 Cal. App. 752, 13
P.2d 989, 992. (Black’s Law 4th Ed. Pg. 1541).
7. Ministerial Officer Jesus Gilberto Bernal is in CONTEMPT of due process of law, amongst other constitutional violation not yet mentioned.
8. MINISTERIAL. That which is done under the authority of a superior; opposed to judicial; that which involves obedience to instructions, but
demands no special discretion, judgement, or skill. Black’s Law 3rd Edition Page 1190.

9. MINISTERIAL ACT. One which a person performs in a prescribed manner, in obedience to the mandate of legal authority, without regard to
or the exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety of the act being done. Pennington v. Streight, 54 Ind. 376; Hair v. Struck, 29 Mont. 45, 74
P. 69, 63 L. R. A. 481; State v. Nash, 66 Ohio St. 612, 64 N. E. 558; Grider v. Tally, 7'[ Ala. 424, 54 Am. Rep. 65; In re Press Printers &
Publishers (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 660, 662; State v. Bartholomew, 103 Conn. 607, 132 A. 30, 34; First Nat. Hank v. Hayes, 186 Iowa, 892, 171 N.
W. 715, 718 ; Boynton v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 893,895. Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Edition Page 1191.

10. MINISTERIAL DUTY. A ministerial duty, the performance of which may in proper cases be required of a public officer by judicial
proceedings, is one in respect to which nothing is left to discretion; it is a simple, definite duty arising under circumstances admitted or proved to
exist and imposed by law. State v. McGrath, 92 Mo. 355, 5 S. W. 29; Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wall. 498, 18 L. Ed. 437; People v. Jerome, 36
Misc. 256, 73 N. Y. S. 306; Duvall v. Swann, 94 Id. 608, 51 A. 617; Gledhill v. Governor, 25 N. J. Law, 351; Houston v. Boltz, 169 Ky. 640,
185 S. W. 76, 80; Mott v. Hull, 51 Okl. 602, 152 P. 92, L. R. A. 1916B, 1184; Ham v. Los Angeles County, 46 Cal. A.pp. 148, 189 P. 462, 468. A
ministerial duty arises when an individual has such a legal interest in its performance that neglect of performance becomes a wrong to such in‐
dividual. Morton v. Comptroller General, 4 S'. C. 473. Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Edition Page 1191.

11. MINISTERIAL OFFICER. One whose duties are purely ministerial, as distinguished from executive, legislative, or judicial functions,

1 of 5 11/21/2024, 1:26 PM
Gmail - Administrative & Commercial; Knowledge(COM 1202) To Maynor Galvez https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=e00edc8889&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r1639...

requiring obedience to the mandates of superiors and not involving the exercise of judgment or discretion. See U. S. v. Bell (C. C.) 127 F. 1002;
Waldoe v. Wallace, 12 Ind. 572; State v. Loechner, 65 Neb. 814, 91 N. W. 874, 59 L. R. A. 915; Reid v. Hood, 2 Nott & McC. (S. C.) 169, 10 Am.
Dec. 582. Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Edition Page 1191.

12. Ministerial Act: A ministerial act is an act performed in a prescribed manner and in obedience to a legal authority, without regard to one’s
own judgment or discretion. The distinction between ministerial acts and acts that are discretionary is often important to determine whether a
public official is shielded by qualified immunity. Generally, ministerial acts are unshielded by qualified immunity, which protects only actions
taken pursuant to discretionary functions. In other words, noncompliance with a ministerial duty bars.

13. MALADMINISTRA'TION, noun Bad management of public affairs; vicious or defective conduct in administration, or the performance of
official duties, particularly of executive and ministerial duties, prescribed by law; as the maladministration of a king, or of any chief magistrate.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Maladministration .

14. CLERICAL MISPRISION. Mistake or fraud perpetrated by clerk of court which is susceptible of demonstration by face of record, or a
clerical error, which is an error by clerk in transcribing or otherwise apparent on the face of the record. Ballew v. Fowler, 285 Ky. 149, 147
S.W.2d 65, 66. But see Newman v. Ohio Valley Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 221 Ky. 616, 299 S.W. 559, 560. (Pg. 319).

BONDING OF CORPORATE ENTITIES

(This is a verified plain statement of fact)
Maxims:
1. The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its possession of commercial Bonds against Public Hazard.
2. No Bond means no responsibility, means no power of Official signature, means no real corporate political power and means no privilege to operate
statutes as the corporate vehicle.
3. The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a responsible substitute for a Bond.
4. Municipal corporations, which include cities, counties, states and national governments, have no commercial reality without bonding of the entity, its
vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its rulings).
5. In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer/Public Office to not receive and report a Claim to its Bonding Company – and it is a felony for the agent of a
Bonding Company to not pay the Claim.
6. If a bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal malpractice within (60) days, then it must pay the full-face
value of a defaulted Lien process at (90) days
7. PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENT: All officials are required by Federal, State and Municipal Law to provide the name,
address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company, the policy number of the bond and if required, a copy of the
policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.

CONCLUSION

Due to the constitutional violations of law committed by Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA has defaulted in this account (ED
CV 24 02122 – JGB(DTBx)) with respect to the violation of public office of trust, honor, and obligations to the living spiritual man. Agent of THE
STATE Judge Jesus G. Bernal, in his official capacity has violated his public office of trust and honor, he is in breach of trust, he has damaged
Petitioner’s right to due process of law via obstruction of proceeding, and fraud upon the court.

Petitioner attest, no personal civil tort claim will necessarily be needed to file against Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal, pursuant to his constitutional
violations of oath of public office/trust/honor, and HONEST SERVICES FRAUD - 1341, 1343, 1346, should the STATE now in default, and liable to
Petitioner, pay claim in full to Petitioner within Thirty (30) days, no later than December 30, 2024.

Deputy Clerk Maynor Galvez, I accept your oath of office as a binding bi-lateral contact, as fiduciary, I instruct you to forward this “NOTICE” to Clerk
of Court Brian D. Karth, I shall forward this notice to the superior of you corporation, and I shall publish this instrument for public and private viewing.

Maynor Galvez, to remain in honor with your obligation of Honest Services in Good Faith in Performance of your Duty under oath to the u.s.
constitution, you MUST report claims against malfeasant Officers for violation of Title LXX – CRIMES – CH.4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE
(Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws) SEC. 5407, it is a felony for the Officer/Public Office to receive and not report a Claim to its Public
Hazard and Malpractice Bonding Company – and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the Claim.
Maynor Galvez, public trustee “Fully Personally Liable Now” on your honor and solemn Oath to perform your obligations and duties to Protect My un-a-
lien-able Rights in your Fiduciary Capacity, I again accept you oath of office of public trust and honor as a binding bi-lateral contract.
Return to me the name, address and telephone number of Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal’s public hazard and malpractice bonding company, the policy
number of the bond and if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.
I, Chief Executor Asim Najee-Asmar Bey, and all my tribal members are witness to the constitutional violations and conspiracy against my unalienable
rights, violations committed by Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal, now pending tort claims against said officers and all conspiring officers of the court, notice
given pursuant to 42 U.S. Code § 1986 - Action for neglect to prevent.

In your public office of trust and honor, fiduciary / trustee capacity as Deputy Clerk, please do not hesitate and file this claim with the Public Hazard and
Malpractice Bonding Company immediately, and get the malfeasant public official Judge Jesus Gilberto Bernal prosecuted for malpractice within (60)
days, should the acting officers of the STATE not honor Petitioners claim, then the Bonding Company will pay the full-face value to Petitioner of the
defaulted Lien process at (90) days, and at this stage Plaintiff will honor the operation of law and initiate civil tort claim against Judge Jesus Gilberto
Bernal and all conspiring agents for violating the unalienable rights of the Petitioner. I shall file this NOTICE into the account, placing on the record my

2 of 5 11/21/2024, 1:26 PM
Gmail - Administrative & Commercial; Knowledge(COM 1202) To Maynor Galvez https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=e00edc8889&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r1639...

DEMAND to public office of trust/honor, Deputy Clerk Maynor Galvez, Public Hazard bonding of foreign corporate agent Jesus Gilberto Bernal

I, :Nadie-Taa:El©™ a.k.a. Asim-Najee Asmar: Bey, attest and affirm that the aforementioned is true and correct, attested to and presented by The Chief
Administrator / Grantor / Settlor / Creditor, Asim-Najee Asmar: Bey a living, breathing, self-aware Ab Original Man (not deceased) who is also the Executor /
Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder / Chief Executive Officer of any associated Trust, Estate, Legal Name, State (Foreign or otherwise), and/or corporation
of the Legal Person known by, referred to, or rendered as ASIM NAJEE ASMAR BEY.

I further acknowledge that this is an act of my free will and Deed to execute my acknowledgement of my acceptance of the Trust / real property / Estate as well as
lawful control of the real property / Estate / Corporation / Trust. Be it said. Be it documented done in/on/and for the record, in this lawful Nisi Prius court of record
on this 21st day of November, 2024.

Honorably presents,
:Asim- Najee Asmar: Bey
ASIM NAJEE ASMAR BEY, ESTATE
Office of the Executor,
Asim Najee-Asmar :Bey
Employer ID No.: 565533821
Care Of 3890 Orange Street, Suite 1173,
Without U.S. 28 U.S.C. 1746(1)Riverside [Non-domestic], California, near [92502]

[ :Confidential-Conveyance is by :Nadie-Taa :El©™. Flesh & Blood, :Ab Original [Indigenous]-Autochthonous-Nubun-Ite-Man of Moor-Pawmunkey Descent, :General
Executor, :Holder-In-Due-Course, :Creditor-In-Fact, :Secured-Party, :Private-Banker, Authorized Representative and Beneficiary of :Legal-Fiction, ASIM NAJEE-ASMAR
BEY©™

Corporate Disclosure: ® R-202310140 Fictitious Business Name ASIM NAJEE-ASMAR BEY Recorded with Riverside Assessors-County of Riverside File
Date: July, 5, 2023.
UCC 1 Financing Statement: File No.: 2024-0250529, File Date: August 21, 2024; DEBTOR: ASIM NAJEE-ASMAR BEY, Secured Party: Asim Najee-
Asmar Bey & Nadie Taa El.
Secured Party Confidentiality Notice: This private email message, including any attachment(s) is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International
Organization(s), Corporation(s), agent(s), investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or 3rd Party(ies), working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email(s), and
any other means of spying and collecting these communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or
Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of all my Ab Original [Indigenous], Autochthonous, & Commercial Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any
omission does not constitute a waiver of any and all/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights. AS 45.01.308, U.N.D.R.I.P, A.D.R.I.P. NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
IS NOTICE TO AGENT, NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL. ]

Notice to Maynor Galvez.pdf

372K

3 of 5 11/21/2024, 1:26 PM