Retroactive Inhibition

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

EXPERIMENT NO: 2

Retroactive Inhibition

Problem Statement

To determine the effect of learning on prior learning by function

of two non-sense syllables.

Methodology

Hypothesis

Subjects’ performance in control group on recall list A will be

better than the recall of subjects in experimental group.

Independent Variable

The list of non-syllables, Meaningful word

Dependent Variable

Subject recall

Sample/subject

There are two subjects, one is experimental and other is

control group which has same attribute no past experience and

knowledge with same 8th semester.

Instruments/Tools
List of non-syllables, memory drum paper pencil, and stop watch.

Procedure

The experiment was performed online via phone call. First, we

use the recalling method in which first subject is experiment. As a

psychologist I recall the first the non-sense words the subject listens

carefully according the inform concerned he recall the words which the

subject remembers. The right and wrong pronunciation of words

counted a then the meaning words recalling and same procedure

repeat. The experimental group has two chances to improve the

memorization. Then the turn of the control group and recall the sense

then non-sense words and record it.

Results

Table 1

Experimental Group non-sense syllables: List A

Trail Response Error


1 5 7
2 2 10
3 3 9
4 4 8
5 7 5
6 6 6
7 9 3
The table 1 shows the results for experimental group non-sense

syllables list A. The results indicates that subject accurately responded

for all the non-sense words in 7 trials.

Table 2

Experimental Group non-sense syllables: List B

Trail Response Error


1 9 6
2 4 8
3 5 7
4 7 5
5 9 3
6 10 2
7 11 1

The table 2 shows the results for experimental group non-sense

syllables list B. The results indicates that subject accurately responded

for all the non-sense words 7 trials.

Table 3

Experimental Group Meaningful word: List A

Trail Response Error


1 6 6
2 7 5
3 8 4
4 9 3
5 9 3
6 10 2
7 11 1

The table 3 shows the results for experimental group meaningful

words list A. The results indicates that subject accurately responded for

all the meaningful words in a total of 7 trials and error in recalling the

meaningful words was found.

Table 4

Experimental Group Meaningful word: List B

Trail Response Error


1 11 1
2 9 3
3 11 1
4 12 0
5 10 2
6 11 1
7 12 0

The table 4 shows the results for experimental group meaningful

words list B. The results indicates that subject accurately responded for

all the meaningful words in a total of 7 trials and error in recalling the

meaningful words was found.

Table 5

Recall

List Trial Respons Errors


es
Experimen A 7 5-9 7-3
tal group non-
sense syllables
Experimen B 7 9-11 3-1
tal group non-
sense syllables
Experimen A 7 6-11 6-1
tal group
meaningful
words
Experimen B 7 11-12 1-0
tal group
meaningful
words

Table 5 indicated the final recall for the non-sense and

meaningful words List A, and B for the experimental group. The results

show that for the non-sense syllables List A the subject responded to 5

words accurately and only made error for 7 words from the list,

whereas for List B the subject accurately responded to 11 words and

made error for 1 word in the list. For the meaningful words List, A

responded 6 words accurately and make 6 errors and B the subject

responded accurately 11 words from list and made one error.

Table 6

Control Group non-sense syllables


Trail Response Error
1 6 6
2 7 5
3 9 3
4 11 1
5 9 3
6 12 0
7 12 0

The table 6 shows the results for control group non-sense

syllables. The results indicates that subject accurately responded for

all the non-sense words 7 trials in which errors occurred.

Table 7

Control Group Meaningful words

Trail Response Error


1 5 7
2 4 8
3 3 9
4 5 7
5 5 7
6 9 3
7 8 4

The table 7 shows the results for control group meaningful

words. The results indicates that subject accurately responded the

meaningful words in 7 trails.


Table 8

Recall

Trial Responses Errors


Control 7 5-8 7-4
group non-sense
syllables
Control 7 6-12 6-0
group meaningful
words

Table 8 indicated the recall for the control group non-sense

syllables and meaningful words. The results indicate that subject

responded 6 words accurately and make 6 errors in meaningful words

while in non-sense words 5 right and 7 errors.

Table 9

Total Recall for Experimental Group and Control Group

Meaningful and Non-Sense Syllables

Groups List Trail Respons Errors


es
Experime A 7 5-9 7-3
ntal group non-
sense syllables
Experime B 7 9-11 3-1
ntal group non-
sense syllables
Experime A 7 6-11 6-1
ntal group
Meaningful
words
Experime B 7 11-12 1-0
ntal group
Meaningful
words
Control - 7 6-12 6-0
group non-
sense syllables
Control - 7 5-8 7-4
group
Meaningful
words

Table 9 indicated the total recall for the experimental group and

control group non-sense and meaningful words. The results indicate for

the experimental group, the non-sense syllables List A the subject

responded to 7 words accurately and only made error for 5 word from

the list, whereas for List B the subject accurately responded to 9 words

and made error for 3 words in the list. For the meaningful words List, A

and B, the subject responded accurately to all 7 trials from both of the

list and made some error. For the control group non-sense syllables

and meaningful words. The results indicate that subject responded to 6

words accurately for the non-sense words and made 6 errors, whereas
for the meaningful words the subject responded to 5 words correctly

and made error in 7 words from the list.

You might also like